Search

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of patients with calcific lesions in the common femoral artery undergoing endovascular procedures with atherectomy device and scoring balloon angioplasty combined with treatment of steno-occlusive disease of the remaining arterial districts of the lower limb. Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2018, 11 diabetic patients at high risk for "major amputation", with calcific lesions of the common femoral artery and ischemic ulcers requiring endovascular treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Technical success was defined as revascularization of the common femoral artery with a residual stenosis lower than 30%. Primary endpoints were an immediate increase of perilesional transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TCPO2) > 40 mmHg, ulcerative lesions improvement up to healing or skin flaps re-epithelialization after minor amputation, limb rescue with rejected major amputation, and resolution of rest pain if present. Results: The success rate of the revascularization procedures was 100%. No patient underwent surgical conversion. One case of peri-operative bleeding at the brachial access site was observed. There were no cases of arterial dissection or undesired distal embolization. The average baseline value of perilesional TCPO2 was 21.8 ± 9.2 mmHg. The mean TCPO2 value was 57.4 ± 7.2 mmHg three days after the procedure (P < 0.05), and 51.2 ± 9.8 mmHg 15 days after (P < 0.05). Minor amputations were performed in five patients with advanced ulcerative lesions. No major amputations were performed in the follow-up period. At 14 months follow-up, one patient developed new occlusion of the CFA for extension from the external iliac artery and underwent a new endovascular procedure. We observed an overall primary patency rate of 91% and a primary assisted patency rate of 100% in our 18-month follow-up. Conclusions: Endovascular approach for severely calcified atherosclerotic lesions of the common femoral artery seems to represent a valid therapeutic option associated with promising results in terms of clinical outcome and low complication rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intracranial carotid artery occlusion represents an underinvestigated cause of acute ischemic stroke as well as an indication for mechanical thrombectomy. We investigated baseline and procedural characteristics, outcomes and predictors of outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to intracranial carotid artery occlusion. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke was performed. Patients with intracranial carotid artery occlusion (infraclinoid and supraclinoid) with or without cervical artery occlusion but with patent intracranial arteries were included. The 3‑month functional independence, mortality, successful reperfusion and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were evaluated. Results: Intracranial carotid artery occlusion with patent intracranial arteries was diagnosed in 387 out of 4940 (7.8%) patients. The median age was 74 years and median baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 18. Functional independence was achieved in 130 (34%) patients, successful reperfusion in 289 (75%) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 33 (9%), whereas mortality occurred in 111 (29%) patients. In univariate analysis functional independence was associated with lower age, lower NIHSS at presentation, higher rate of successful reperfusion and lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Multivariable regression analysis found age (odds ratio, OR:1.03; P = 0.006), NIHSS at presentation (OR: 1.07; P < 0.001), diabetes (OR: 2.60; P = 0.002), successful reperfusion (OR:0.20; P < 0.001) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 4.17; P < 0.001) as the best independent predictors of outcome. Conclusion: Our study showed a not negligible rate of intracranial carotid artery occlusion with patent intracranial arteries, presenting mostly as severe stroke, with an acceptable rate of 3‑month functional independence. Age, NIHSS at presentation and successful reperfusion were the best independent predictors of outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using b-values of 1000 s/mm2 and 2000 s/mm2 at 3 Tesla (T) for the evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer. Matherials and Methods. Seventy-eight prostate cancer patients underwent a 3T MRI scan followed by radical prostatectomy. DWI was performed using b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm2 and qualitatively analysed by two radiologists. ADC mapswere obtained at b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 and quantitatively analyzed in consensus. Results. For diagnosis of 78 prostate cancers the accuracy of DWI for the young reader was significantly greater at b = 2000 s/mm2 for the peripheral zone (PZ) but not for the transitional zone (TZ). For the experienced reader, DWI did not show significant differences in accuracy between b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2.The quantitative analysis in the PZ and TZwas substantially superimposable between the two b-values, albeit with a higher accuracy with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2. Conclusions. With a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 at 3T both readers differentiated clinical significant cancer from benign tissue; higher b-values can be helpful for the less experienced readers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is the end stage of peripheral arterial disease. The revascularization of patients suffering from diabetes mellitus who present chronic total occlusions of below-the-knee vessels can be technically very difficult and sometimes impossible to achieve by performing only an antegrade approach. As regards retrograde recanalization, several studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of this technique in the femoropopliteal axis or in the infrageniculate arterial vessels in patients with advanced atherosclerotic disease. Currently in the literature there are still few studies analyzing the effectiveness of the retrograde approach in the treatment of occlusions of below-the-knee vessels in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus., Objectives: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate safety, technical success, and clinical outcome of retrograde transpedal/transtibial recanalization in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus., Research Design: This is a retrospective observational monocentric study., Subjects: We retrospectively analyzed data over a three-year period (August 2019-September 2022) of patients that underwent revascularization of one or more below-the-knee vessels for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and had a retrograde transpedal/transtibial approach after a failed antegrade transfemoral revascularization. We identified and included in the study 28 out of 352 patients., Measures: We evaluated clinical comorbidities, Rutherford-Becker classification, Texas classification, and the occluded vessels (only below-the-knee or multi-level occlusions); we then analyzed technical, procedural and clinical success, survival rate, and procedural complications. All patients included in the study underwent a 6 months follow-up., Results: Patients belonged to Rutherford-Becker stage V (18) or VI (10), Texas wound classification IIC: 7 IID: 8 IIIC: 4 IIID: 9, all suffering from diabetes, and five were on dialysis. Treatment of a femoropopliteal lesion was performed during the same procedure in 6 of 28 patients (28.6%). Technical success was obtained in 25 out of 28 patients (89.3%), and procedural success was achieved in 23 of 28 patients (82.1%). No complications occurred at the pedal/tibial access. One minor complication at the femoral access was observed. The cure rate 6 months after the procedure was 57.1% (16/28 patients), and the 6-month survival rate was 96.4%. Three major amputations (10.7%) and four minor amputations (14.2%) were performed after revascularization procedures. Two patients were readmitted for vascular causes (7.1%)., Conclusions: Retrograde approach for revascularization of below-the-knee vessels in diabetic patients is safe and effective with high procedural and clinical success rates in the absence of significant complications. It should be considered when revascularization cannot be achieved with an antegrade transfemoral approach., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.