Search

Objectives To evaluate the long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate response (IR) to MTX, csDMARDs or bDMARDs. Methods Data from three completed phase III studies—RA-BEAM (MTX-IR), RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR) and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR)—and one completed long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND) were analysed up to 6.5 years [340 weeks (RA-BEAM) and 336 weeks (RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON)]. Low disease activity (LDA) [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11], clinical remission (SDAI ≤3.3) and physical function [Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤0.5] were the main outcomes assessed. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population. Results At week 340 or 336, LDA was achieved in 37%/83% of MTX-IR, 35%/83% of csDMARD-IR and 23%/73% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Remission was achieved in 20%/40% of MTX-IR, 13%/32% of csDMARD-IR and 9%/30% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. HAQ-DI ≤0.5 was reached in 31%/51% of MTX-IR, 25%/46% of csDMARD-IR and 24%/38% of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, assessed by NRI/completer analyses, respectively. Conclusion Treatment with baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg demonstrated efficacy up to 6.5 years with maintained LDA/remission results across SDAI, CDAI and DAS28-hsCRP consistent with previously reported data, and was well tolerated. Trial registration United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov ; RA-BEYOND; NCT01885078. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Upadacitinib has been found to improve symptoms as early as day 1 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. As a result, early and timely initiation of upadacitinib is paramount to prevent hospital admission for an acute flare. The purpose of this study was to identify the time to initiation of upadacitinib, comparing external specialty pharmacies (ESPs) to a health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP). Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study at the University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and included patients initiated on upadacitinib between March 1, 2022, and April 1, 2023. Data collected included demographics, prior authorization information, appeal information, insurance type, date the prescription was sent, and date the patient initiated therapy (patients were called to confirm the date). The primary outcome evaluated was the days from prescribing to patient initiation. Secondary outcomes included the total time to initiation and the time to notification from insurance regarding determination of a prior authorization or appeal. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, initiated therapy through alternative means, or had previously initiated upadacitinib. Results A total of 107 patients were initiated on upadacitinib during the study period (n = 18 through the UCM HSSP, n = 89 through an ESP). The median number of days to patient initiation was 3 days (interquartile range, 3-6 days) for the UCM specialty pharmacy vs 9 days (interquartile range, 4-13 days) for ESPs (P = 0.003). A total of 88.9% of patients filling through the UCM specialty pharmacy initiated upadacitinib within 7 days, compared to 47.2% of patients filling through an ESP (P = 0.001). Seven patients needed earlier initiation of therapy to prevent hospital admission. Conclusion This study validates the ability of HSSPs to initiate therapies earlier than ESPs with a particular focus on upadacitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The 48‐week, phase 2 SLEek study (NCT03978520) evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (JAK inhibitor) and elsubrutinib (BTK inhibitor) alone or in combination (ABBV‐599) in adults with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to elsubrutinib 60 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (ABBV‐599 high dose), elsubrutinib 60 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (ABBV‐599 low dose), elsubrutinib 60 mg once daily (QD), upadacitinib 30 mg QD, or placebo QD. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving both Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI‐4) and glucocorticoid dose ≤10 mg QD at week 24. Additional assessments through week 48 included British Isles Lupus Assessment Group‐Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) responses, number of flares, time to first flare, and adverse events. Results: The study enrolled 341 patients. The ABBV‐599 low dose and elsubrutinib arms were discontinued after a planned interim analysis showed lack of efficacy (no safety concerns). More patients achieved the primary endpoint with upadacitinib (54.8%; P = 0.028) and ABBV‐599 high dose (48.5%; P = 0.081) versus placebo (37.3%). SRI‐4, BICLA, and LLDAS response rates were higher for both upadacitinib and ABBV‐599 high dose versus placebo at weeks 24 and 48. Flares were reduced, and time to first flare through week 48 was substantially delayed with both upadacitinib and ABBV‐599 high dose versus placebo. No new safety signals were observed beyond those previously reported for upadacitinib or elsubrutinib. Conclusion: Upadacitinib 30 mg alone or in combination with elsubrutinib (ABBV‐599 high dose) demonstrated significant improvements in SLE disease activity and reduced flares and were well tolerated through 48 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The combination of JAK/HDAC inhibitors shows beneficial effects in hematological malignancies and a promising therapeutic potential in CTCL. Recent in vitro and in vivo data have shown that the combination of Resminostat (HDACi) with Ruxolitinib (Jaki) acts synergistically and inhibits tumorigenesis and metastasis in CTCL experimental models. Angiogenesis is the most critical process for tumor growth and metastasis and plays an essential role in cutaneous lymphoma development and progression. The vascular microenvironment of lymphomas accelerates angiogenesis via the paracrine activity of tumor-derived mediators. However, few studies have investigated the role of either ruxolitinib or resminostat in the angiogenesis of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Although precise mechanisms of angiogenesis in CTCL remain unclear, the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) has been used, among other in vivo models, to implant several tumor types as well as malignant cell lines to study their growth rate, angiogenic potential, and metastatic capability. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of combinational therapies of JAKi/HDACi in CTCL angiogenesis by using a CTCL-specific chick embryo model. Angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in the growth and metastasis of tumors, including the development and progression of cutaneous lymphomas. The chick embryo CAM model has been utilized in various studies to assess the growth rate, angiogenic potential, and metastatic capability of different tumor types and malignant cell lines. However, the precise mechanisms of angiogenesis in CTCL and the influence of Ruxolitinib or Resminostat on angiogenesis in hematological malignancies and solid tumors are not well understood. Recent in vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated the synergistic inhibition of tumorigenesis and metastasis in experimental models of CTCL when using the combination of Resminostat (HDACi) with Ruxolitinib (JAKi). The present work aims to elucidate the effects of this combination on the tumor microenvironment's vascular components. We investigated the effects of Ruxolitinib (JAKi) in combination with Resminostat (HDACi) treatment in transendothelial migration of CTCL cells (106 MyLa and SeAx) by using a transwell-based transendothelial migration assay and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. We used the CTCL chick embryo CAM model with xenografted tumors derived from implanted MyLa and SeAx cells and administered topically 15 μM ruxolitinib and 5 μM Resminostat every two days during a 5-day period. JAKi and HDACi inhibited CTCL cell transendothelial migration by 75% and 82% (p < 0.05) in both CTCL engrafted cells (MyLa and SeAx, respectively) compared to the untreated group. Moreover, the combination of ruxolitinib with resminostat blocked angiogenesis by significantly reducing the number of blood vessel formation by 49% and 34% in both MyLa and SeAx, respectively (p < 0.05), indicating that the proposed combination exerted significant anti-angiogenic effects in the CAM CTCL model. Overall, these data provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic strategies targeting angiogenesis in CTCL, paving the way for more effective treatment approaches in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To better understand the pathogenesis of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), we examined the effect of the cytokines type I interferons (IFN I) and JAK inhibitor drugs (JAKi) on gene expression in bioengineered pediatric skeletal muscle. Methods Myoblasts from three healthy pediatric donors were used to create three-dimensional skeletal muscle units termed myobundles. Myobundles were treated with IFN I, either IFNα or IFNβ. A subset of IFNβ-exposed myobundles was treated with JAKi tofacitinib or baricitinib. RNA sequencing analysis was performed on all myobundles. Results Seventy-six myobundles were analysed. Principal component analysis showed donor-specific clusters of gene expression across IFNα and IFNβ-exposed myobundles in a dose-dependent manner. Both cytokines upregulated interferon response and proinflammatory genes; however, IFNβ led to more significant upregulation. Key downregulated pathways involved oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism and myogenesis genes. Addition of tofacitinib or baricitinib moderated the gene expression induced by IFNβ, with partial reversal of upregulated inflammatory and downregulated myogenesis pathways. Baricitinib altered genetic profiles more than tofacitinib. Conclusion IFNβ leads to more pro-inflammatory gene upregulation than IFNα, correlating to greater decrease in contractile protein gene expression and reduced contractile force. JAK inhibitors, baricitinib more so than tofacitinib, partially reverse IFN I-induced genetic changes. Increased IFN I exposure in healthy bioengineered skeletal muscle leads to IFN-inducible gene expression, inflammatory pathway enrichment, and myogenesis gene downregulation, consistent with what is observed in JDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The bidirectional communication network between the gut and the brain, known as the gut–brain axis, plays a crucial role in health and disease. This review explores the mechanisms underlying gut–brain interaction disorders and highlights translational therapies bridging neurology and gastroenterology. Mechanisms encompass anatomical, endocrine, humoral, metabolic, and immune pathways, with the gut microbiota exerting profound influence. Clinical evidence links gut microbiota fluctuations to mood disorders, GI disruptions, and neurodevelopmental conditions, emphasizing the microbiome's pivotal role in shaping brain–gut interactions. Pharmacological therapies such as amitriptyline and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors modulate neurotransmitter activity, offering relief in functional gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Non-pharmacological interventions like cognitive–behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy address maladaptive thoughts and induce relaxation, alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms exacerbated by stress. Emerging therapies include gut microbiota modulation, dietary interventions, vagus nerve stimulation, and intestinal barrier modulation, offering novel approaches to manage neurological disorders via the gastrointestinal tract. Understanding and harnessing the gut–brain axis holds promise for personalized therapeutic strategies in neurogastroenterology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to examine whether creatine kinase (CK) elevation occurs with interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors, as in Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, which are reported to increase CK levels in rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and methods: A multicenter database of JAK inhibitor and IL-6 inhibitor treatment was retrospectively searched between January 2016 to December 2022; 142 cases (117 females, 25 males, mean age: 63.8±13.0 years; range, 20 to 85 years), with 71 cases in each group, were extracted by propensity score matching using age, sex, body mass index, and CK at 0 weeks. The outlier rate was compared. Patients’ background characteristics related to elevated CK levels at 24 weeks were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Creatine kinase levels at 4 and 12 weeks were significantly higher with JAK inhibitors than with IL-6 inhibitors (four weeks, 72 vs. 87.5 IU/mL, p=0.016; 12 weeks, 71 vs. 95.5 IU/mL, p=0.028). The outlier rate (Grade 1) with JAK inhibitors increased significantly over time (0 weeks, 4.2%; four weeks, 18.1%; 12 weeks, 21.7%; 24 weeks, 18.3%; p=0.015), whereas that with IL-6 inhibitors increased slightly (0 weeks, 5.6%; four weeks, 9.2%; 12 weeks, 8.6%; 24 weeks, 8.5%; p=0.745), with a significant difference between the groups (p=0.035). No patients discontinued treatment due to myalgia or renal dysfunction. The factors significantly positively related to elevated CK levels at 24 weeks were male sex and creatinine. Those significantly negatively related were Steinbrocker stage and class, modified health assessment questionnaire scores, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and glucocorticoid dose. Conclusion: Mild CK elevations with JAK inhibitors are not a particular clinical problem. CK elevation might be specific to JAK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ritlecitinib (Litfulo™) is a valuable new option for the treatment of severe alopecia areata in individuals aged ≥ 12 years. Of note, ritlecitinib, a dual selective Janus kinase (JAK)-3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, is the first targeted treatment for severe alopecia areata to be approved for use in adolescents. In the pivotal, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 ALLEGRO trial in adults and adolescents with alopecia areata with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss, once-daily oral ritlecitinib 50 mg significantly increased the percentage of patients achieving ≤ 20% scalp hair loss at 24 weeks. Ritlecitinib therapy was also associated with eyebrow and eyelash regrowth. Response rates for key efficacy outcomes in the pivotal trial continued to increase with treatment up to 48 weeks. Longer-term data indicate that responses are sustained with continued treatment. Ritlecitinib is generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being of mild severity and not requiring dose interruption or treatment discontinuation. Plain Language Summary: Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease characterised by hair loss, including from the scalp, face and/or body. It has a lifetime incidence of approximately 2% globally, affecting both children and adults, and can be associated with a significant psychological burden. For severe disease (generally defined as ≥ 50% scalp hair loss), there are few effective treatments available. Ritlecitinib (Litfulo™) is a valuable new treatment option, approved in the EU, the USA and several other countries for the treatment of severe alopecia areata in individuals aged ≥ 12 years, making it the first targeted treatment to be approved for use in adolescents. As demonstrated in the pivotal ALLEGRO-2b/3 clinical trial, ritlecitinib, taken orally (as a capsule) once daily, provides clinically meaningful hair regrowth (including eyebrow and eyelash regrowth) in patients with alopecia areata with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. Furthermore, hair regrowth is sustained longer term with continued treatment. Ritlecitinib is generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being of mild severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To investigate the predictive factors for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) and assess the efficacy of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the ANSWER cohort comprising 3623 RA patients treated with bDMARDs or JAKi in Japan. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse the hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment retention. Results Of the 3623 RA patients, 450 (12.4%) met the first two criteria of the EULAR D2T RA definition (defined as D2T RA in this study). Factors contributing to D2T RA included age over 75 (compared with those under 65, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.69), higher rheumatoid factor (RF) titres (HR = 1.005; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01), higher clinical disease activity index (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), lower methotrexate dosage (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and comorbidities like hypertension (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.95) and diabetes (HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.73). Anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies (aIL-6R, HR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.75) and JAKi (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.90) were associated with fewer discontinuations due to ineffectiveness compared with TNF inhibitors. Oral glucocorticoid usage (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.47) was linked to increased discontinuation due to toxic adverse events. Conclusion Younger onset, higher RF titres, and comorbidities predicted D2T RA development. For managing D2T RA, aIL-6R and JAKi exhibited superior drug retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real‐world population of patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: We conducted a nationwide population‐based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow‐up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, and proton‐pump inhibitors were time‐varying variables. Results: The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow‐up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8–1.5) per 1,000 person‐years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7–1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease. Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lichen planus (LP), an idiopathic, multifaceted chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, affects approximately 0.5–1% of the population. The various clinical manifestations of LP fall into three broad categories, namely cutaneous, appendageal, and mucosal, with further subclassification depending on the morphology and distribution patterns of individual lesions. There is mounting evidence that LP has systemic associations, including autoimmune conditions, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disorders. Cutaneous hypertrophic and mucosal forms of LP are at a heightened risk for malignant transformation. Familiarity with these potential associations in conjunction with long-term follow-up and regular screening could lead to a timely diagnosis and management of concomitant conditions. In addition, the frequent quality of life (QoL) impairment in LP underscores the need for a comprehensive approach including psychological evaluation and support. Several treatment strategies have been attempted, though most of them have not been adopted in clinical practice because of suboptimal benefit-to-risk ratios or lack of evidence. More recent studies toward pathogenesis-driven treatments have identified Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as apremilast, and biologics targeting the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 pathway as novel therapeutic options, resulting in a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP. This contemporary review focuses on the diagnosis and management of LP, and places emphasis on more recently described targeted treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (JIIM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by skeletal muscle weakness with or without a skin rash. Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common subtype of JIIM, accounting for 80% of JIIM. Recent studies identified several myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs). Each MSA or MAA is associated with distinct clinical features and outcomes, although there are several differences in the prevalence of MSA/MAA and autoantibody–phenotype relationships between age and ethnic groups. Histopathological studies have revealed critical roles of type I interferons and vasculopathy in the development of JDM. Serological classification mostly corresponds to clinicopathological classification. Novel therapeutic agents, such as biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), have been developed; however, to date, there is a lack of high-level evidence. As advances in treatment have reduced the mortality rate of JIIM, recent studies have focused on medium- and long-term outcomes. However, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) remains a major cause of death in anti-melanoma differentiation gene 5 autoantibody-positive JDM. Early diagnosis and intervention using a multi-drug regimen is critical for the treatment of RP-ILD. Rituximab and JAKi may reduce mortality in patients with JDM-associated RP-ILD refractory to conventional therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of Crohn's disease (CD) in the Middle East, like in other parts of the world, is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel advanced medical and biological therapies. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), several biological therapies are used to achieve remission in severe and resistant cases of CD. We carried out a literature search to analyze the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments currently licensed in the UAE. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases from inception to January 2020 to identify relevant studies. Search terms were generated using established treatment guidelines for CD. We also manually searched the bibliographies of relevant literature to obtain additional papers. Results: Biologic and small molecule agents for CD include four core drug classes: anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (TNF-α), integrin receptor antagonists, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and IL-12/IL-23 antagonists. All drug classes showed good efficacy and safety in managing patients with CD. Some drug classes had distinguishable side effect profiles. This included an increased lymphoma and tuberculous risk for TNF-α and integrin receptor antagonists. Many trials supported the effectiveness of these licensed drugs. Biologic agent intolerance was common; one-third of patients receiving TNF-α treatment will develop intolerance to that specific drug. Conclusions: Advanced medical therapies licensed in the UAE have proven to be safe and efficacious. Additional research is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of newer biologics and biosimilars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Studies have shown that chemokines can stimulate the migration and activation of microglia to cause chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). However, the involvement of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) as a new chemotactic factor in regulating CPSP and its underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study is to investigate the role of CXCR2 in the development of CPSP and reveal the underlying mechanism. Material and Methods: A rat model of skin/muscle incision and retraction was established, and treated with or without SB225002 (a selective inhibitor of CXCR2). In addition, the primary microglia cells induced by lipopolysaccharide were applied as an in vitro model for CPSP and treated individually with si-negative control (NC), si-CXCR2, si-CXCR2+Interleukin (IL)-6 (an agonist of the janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)3 signaling pathway), si-CXCR2+IL-6+si-NC, or si-CXCR2+IL-6+si-exchange protein 1 directly activated by cAMP (EPAC1). Results: Results from the database analysis showed that CXCR2 and JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway-related genes, including JAK1, STAT3, and EPAC1, were mainly involved in the development of CPSP. Inhibition of CXCR2 expression not only inhibited the reduction of foot pain threshold in CPSP models but also led to a decreased expression of CXCR2 and the phosphorylation levels of JAK and STAT3 in both animal and cell models. Furthermore, inhibition of EPAC1 expression can hinder the regulatory function of CXCR2. Conclusion: This study indicated that the high expression of CXCR2 activates the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway, enhances EPAC1 activation in microglial cells, and exacerbates CPSP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease which can induce progressive disability if not properly treated early. Over the last 20 years, the improvement of knowledge on the pathogenesis of the disease has made available several drugs targeting key elements of the pathogenetic process, which now represent the preferred treatment option after the failure of first-line therapy with conventional drugs such as methotrexate (MTX). To this category of targeted drugs belong anti-cytokine or cell-targeted biological agents and more recently also Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis). In the absence to date of specific biomarkers to guide the therapeutic choice in the context of true precision medicine, the choice of the first targeted drug after MTX failure is guided by treatment cost (especially after the marketing of biosimilar products) and by the clinical characteristics of the patient (age, sex, comorbidities and compliance) and the disease (presence or absence of autoantibodies and systemic or extra-articular manifestations), which may influence the efficacy and safety profile of the available products. This viewpoint focuses on the decision-making process underlying the personalized approach to RA therapy and will analyse the evidence in the literature supporting the choice of individual products and in particular the differential choice between biological drugs and JAKis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and fluctuating disease. Optimal management of AD and related comorbidities requires seamless coordination across multiple layers of the healthcare system. The objective of this survey was to explore patients' experiences with current management of AD. Out of 251 responders to this anonymous survey, 76% reported to have moderate or severe AD. Sixty-nine percent with moderate and 45% with severe AD were followed up at primary care level only. Use of advanced systemic treatment options was rare, and the majority experienced itch (97%), dry skin, rash, negative impact on self-esteem and comorbidities despite ongoing treatment. Only 36% received a treatment plan, more often in secondary (78.3%) than primary care (25.0%). Forty-three percent did not know who was responsible for their follow-up and 54% felt no one was responsible. Treatment options were commonly not known or understood. The survey results demonstrate undertreatment, lack of a holistic approach for management of AD. A national pathway including clear referral criteria and timelines can streamline management of AD across multiple levels of the healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The ORAL Surveillance trial found a dose‐dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We aimed to assess VTE incidence over time and explore risk factors of VTE, including disease activity, in ORAL Surveillance. Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or TNFi. Post hoc, cumulative probabilities and incidence rates (patients with first events/100 patient‐years) by 6‐month intervals were estimated for adjudicated VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and PE. Cox regression models identified risk factors. Clinical Disease Activity Index leading up to the event was explored in patients with VTE. Results: Cumulative probabilities for VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib 10 mg BID, but not 5 mg BID, versus TNFi. Incidence rates were consistent across 6‐month intervals within treatments. Across treatments, risk factors for VTE included prior VTE, body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2, older age, and history of chronic lung disease. At the time of the event, most patients with VTE had active disease as defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index. Conclusion: Incidences of VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib (10 > 5 mg BID) versus TNFi and were generally consistent over time. Across treatments, VTE risk factors were aligned with previous studies in the general RA population. These data highlight the importance of assessing VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, and VTE history, when considering initiation of tofacitinib or TNFi in patients with active RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Caution has been advocated recently when using Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile. We aimed to compare the incidences in cardiovascular events between JAKi and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in a large population of RA patients. Methods RA patients starting a new bDMARD or JAKi between 1 August 2018 and 31 January 2022 have been selected from IQVIA's Dutch Real-World Data Longitudinal Prescription database, covering about 63% of outpatient prescriptions in the Netherlands. Study outcome was a cardiovascular event, defined as the start of platelet aggregation inhibitors during the study period. The incidence densities of cardiovascular events were compared between JAKi and bDMARDs using multilevel Poisson regression, adjusted for exposure time and confounders. Results The number of unique patients included was 15 191, with 28 481 patient-years on treatment with either JAKi (2373) or bDMARDs (26 108). Most patients were female (72%) and median age was 62 years. We found 36 cardiovascular events (1.52 events/100 patient-years) during therapy with JAKi and 383 events (1.47 events/100 patient-years) during therapy with bDMARDs, resulting in an adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.99 for JAKi compared with bDMARDs (95% CI: 0.70, 1.41). Sub-analyses in patients >65 years, by sex, or separately for tofacitinib and baricitinib, yielded similar results. Conclusion In a large Dutch general RA population, the risk of cardiovascular events seems not to be different between JAKi users and those using bDMARDs, although a small increase in higher risk patients cannot be excluded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Upadacitinib improved the signs and symptoms of non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA) versus placebo over 14 weeks in the primary analysis of the SELECT‐AXIS 2 nr‐axSpA study. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 1 year in patients with nr‐axSpA in SELECT‐AXIS 2. Methods: Patients aged at least 18 years diagnosed with nr‐axSpA who fulfilled the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria and were receiving stable background therapy were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo for the 52‐week double‐blind period. Efficacy was assessed using non‐responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI‐MI) and as‐observed analyses for binary endpoints, and mixed‐effects model repeated measures for continuous endpoints. Results: Of 314 randomized patients, 259 (upadacitinib, n = 129; placebo, n = 130) completed 52 weeks of treatment. More patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo achieved ≥40% improvement in ASAS at week 52 (63% vs 43%, NRI‐MI; nominal P < 0.001). Similar treatment effects were observed for the achievement of axSpA Disease Activity Score inactive disease (33% v 11%, NRI‐MI; nominal P < 0.001). Overall, patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo showed greater improvement in disease activity, inflammation, pain, function, enthesitis, and quality of life through 52 weeks. Adverse events were generally comparable between the treatment groups. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, inflammatory bowel disease, or deaths were reported in those receiving upadacitinib. Conclusion: Treatment with upadacitinib showed sustained efficacy versus placebo with no new safety findings identified through 1 year. These results support the continued favorable benefit–risk profile of upadacitinib treatment for nr‐axSpA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current endpoints for therapeutic trials of hospitalized COVID-19 patients capture only part of the clinical course of a patient and have limited statistical power and robustness. Methods: We specify proportional odds models for repeated measures of clinical status, with a common odds ratio of lower severity over time. We also specify the proportional hazards model for time to each level of improvement or deterioration of clinical status, with a common hazard ratio for overall treatment benefit. We apply these methods to Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trials. Results: For remdesivir versus placebo, the common odds ratio was 1.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23–1.79; p < 0.001), and the common hazard ratio was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.09–1.47; p = 0.002). For baricitinib plus remdesivir versus remdesivir alone, the common odds ratio was 1.32 (95% CI = 1.10–1.57; p = 0.002), and the common hazard ratio was 1.30 (95% CI = 1.13–1.49; p < 0.001). For interferon beta-1a plus remdesivir versus remdesivir alone, the common odds ratio was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.79–1.14; p = 0.56), and the common hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.85–1.12; p = 0.74). Conclusions: The proposed methods comprehensively characterize the treatment effects on the entire clinical course of a hospitalized COVID-19 patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To understand the relative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, vs other biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) for PsA using network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods A systematic literature review (most recent update conducted on 1 January 2023) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of b/tsDMARDs in PsA. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for efficacy outcomes at Weeks 12–24 for b/tsDMARD-naïve and TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced patients. Safety at Weeks 12–24 was analysed in a mixed population. Odds ratios (ORs) and differences of mean change with the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated for the best-fitting models, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to determine relative rank. Results The NMA included 41 RCTs for 22 b/tsDMARDs. For minimal disease activity (MDA), bimekizumab ranked 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients. In b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, bimekizumab ranked 6th, 5th and 3rd for ACR response ACR20/50/70, respectively. In TNFi-experienced patients, bimekizumab ranked 1st, 2nd and 1st for ACR20/50/70, respectively. For Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, bimekizumab ranked 2nd and 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, respectively, and 1st and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients, respectively. Bimekizumab was comparable to b/tsDMARDs for serious adverse events. Conclusion Bimekizumab ranked favourably among b/tsDMARDs for efficacy on joint, skin and MDA outcomes, and showed comparable safety, suggesting it may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Patients with RA treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). The objective of this study was to investigate the serological immunogenicity and safety of the HZ subunit (HZ/su) vaccine in RA patients treated with JAKi, for which little is known. Methods RA patients treated with JAKi (n  = 82) at the Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden, and healthy controls (n  = 51) received two doses of the HZ/su vaccine (Shingrix). Vaccine-specific antibody responses were analysed using indirect ELISA. Post-vaccination antibody levels were compared between patients and controls using analysis of covariance. Potential predictors for vaccine response were investigated using a multivariable linear regression analysis. Self-reported adverse events (AEs) and changes in RA disease activity were analysed. Results Following vaccination, vaccine-specific antibody levels increased significantly in both patients and controls (P  < 0.0001). A total of 80.5% of patients and 98.0% of controls achieved a ≥4-fold increase in antibody levels. Post-vaccination antibody levels were lower in patients than controls [ratio 0.44 (95% CI 0.31, 0.63)] and lower in patients receiving JAKi + methotrexate than JAKi monotherapy [ratio 0.43 (95% CI 0.24, 0.79)]. AEs, mostly mild/moderate, were common. One patient developed HZ and six patients (6.5%) had increased RA disease activity following vaccination. Conclusion The HZ/su vaccine was serologically immunogenic in most RA patients treated with JAKi. Moreover, the vaccine had an acceptable safety profile. These results support recommendations for use of the HZ/su vaccine in this vulnerable population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT03886038. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1-selective inhibitor, is efficacious in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with a manageable long-term safety profile. Objective: We aimed to provide updated integrated long-term safety results for abrocitinib from available data accrued up to a maximum of almost 4 years in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the JADE clinical development program. Methods: Analysis included 3802 patients (exposure: 5213.9 patient-years) from the phase II monotherapy study (NCT02780167) and the phase III studies JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871), JADE TEEN (NCT03796676), JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470), JADE DARE (NCT04345367; 200 mg only), JADE REGIMEN (NCT03627767), and JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822; data cutoff 25 September, 2021). Data from patients receiving one or more doses of abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg were pooled in a consistent-dose cohort (patients were allocated to receive the same abrocitinib dose throughout exposure in the qualifying parent study and/or long-term study) or a variable-dose cohort (patients received open-label abrocitinib 200 mg; responders were randomized to abrocitinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo, and could then receive abrocitinib 200 mg plus topical corticosteroids as rescue therapy). Incidence rates of adverse events of special interest were assessed. Cox regression analysis of risk factors for herpes zoster and serious infections was performed. Results: Overall, this safety analysis of long-term data up to a maximum of ~ 4 years of abrocitinib exposure does not indicate any changes from the previously reported risk profile. The most frequent serious infections (per Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term) with consistent-dose abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg were herpes zoster (0.5% and 0.2%), pneumonia (0.2% with either dose), and herpes simplex (0.1% with either dose). Risk factors for herpes zoster were a history of herpes zoster, abrocitinib 200-mg dose, age ≥ 65 years, absolute lymphocyte count < 1 × 103/mm3 before the event, and residing in Asia. For serious infections, > 100 kg body weight was a risk factor. Incidence rate/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval) with the consistent abrocitinib 200-mg and 100-mg dose combined was higher in older (aged ≥ 65 years) patients versus younger (aged 18 to < 65 years) patients for serious adverse events (17.6 [11.7‒25.4] vs 6.7 [5.8‒7.8]), malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (2.4 [0.6‒6.0] vs 0.1 [0.0‒0.4]), non-melanoma skin cancer (2.4 [0.6‒6.1] vs 0.2 [0.1‒0.4]), lymphopenia (3.5 [1.3‒7.6] vs 0.1 [0.0‒0.3]), and venous thromboembolism (1.7 [0.4‒5.1] vs 0.1 [0.0‒0.3]). Incident rate/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval) of non-melanoma skin cancer with the consistent abrocitinib 200-mg and 100-mg dose combined was higher in current/former smokers (0.9 [0.4‒1.6]) vs never-smokers (0.0 [0.0‒0.1]). Conclusions: This safety update showed a consistent profile for abrocitinib with no new safety signals and continues to support that abrocitinib has a manageable long-term safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Risk of specific adverse events was higher in certain patient populations, especially those aged ≥ 65 years. [Video abstract available.] Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02780167; study start date: April, 2016; primary completion date: March, 2017; study completion date: April, 2017. NCT03349060; study start date: 7 December, 2017; study completion date: 26 March, 2019. NCT03575871; study start date: 29 June, 2018; study completion date: 13 August, 2019. NCT03720470; study start date: 29 October, 2018; primary completion date: 27 December, 2019; study completion date: 6 March, 2020. NCT03796676; study start date: 18 February, 2019; study completion date: 8 April, 2020. NCT03627767; study start date: 11 June, 2018; primary completion date: 2 September, 2020; study completion date: 7 October, 2020. NCT04345367; study start date: 11 June, 2020; primary completion date: 16 December, 2020; study completion date: 13 July, 2021. NCT03422822; study start date: 8 March, 2018; study completion date: ongoing (estimated completion date: 31 January, 2026). Plain Language Summary: Abrocitinib is an approved treatment for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis, also known as AD or atopic eczema. Abrocitinib is a tablet that is taken by mouth once a day. This safety analysis looked at the side effects of treatment in a large group of adults and adolescents with moderate or severe AD who took abrocitinib up to a maximum of almost 4 years. This analysis also looked at which people were more likely to have certain side effects after taking abrocitinib. The results from this analysis were similar to those of previous safety analyses with abrocitinib, with no new side effects. Infections such as shingles, pneumonia, or herpes simplex can occur during treatment with abrocitinib. Shingles was more likely to occur in people who previously had shingles before taking abrocitinib, or who took the higher dose of abrocitinib (200 mg), or were 65 years of age or older, or had certain blood test results, or lived in Asia. People who are 65 years of age or older and took abrocitinib were more likely to develop some types of cancer, have certain abnormal blood test results, or develop blood clots in the veins than people with AD who were younger and took abrocitinib. Current or former smokers with AD who took abrocitinib were more likely to develop skin cancer (but not melanoma) than people with AD who took abrocitinib but have never smoked. This analysis further shows that abrocitinib had manageable safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Dex5AhfAxs29XQspjFnxYi Video abstract: Integrated safety update of abrocitinib in 3802 patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: data from more than 5200 patient-years with up to 4 years of exposure (MP4 63720 KB) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2). Objective: To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12–17 years from pooled phase 3 study data. Methods: Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigator's Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3–20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12–17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [− 0.9 (1.9) versus −0.2 (1.4); P = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events. Conclusions: Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the subset of adolescent patients with AD, comparable with those observed in the overall study population; long-term, as-needed use maintained disease control and was well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03745638 (registered 19 November 2018) and NCT03745651 (registered 19 November 2018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tocilizumab and baricitinib have emerged as potential treatments for patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) following the findings of the Recovery Group and the results of the COV-BARRIER study. Unfortunately, there is a lack of guidance regarding the use of these agents in high-risk patients, such as those with obesity. Objective: To compare the outcomes of tocilizumab and baricitinib as potential treatments for obese patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: This was a multi-center retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of obese patients who received the standard of care plus tocilizumab or baricitinib for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Included patients had a BMI >30 kg/m2, needed ICU level care, and required non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support. Results: This study included 64 patients who received tocilizumab and 69 patients who received baricitinib. When examining the primary outcome, patients who received tocilizumab had a shorter duration of ventilatory support (10.0 vs 15.0 days, P =.016) than patients who received baricitinib. Our secondary outcome of in-hospital mortality was lower in the tocilizumab group as well (23.4% vs 53.6%, P <.001). Tocilizumab was also associated with a non-significant reduction in new positive blood cultures (13.0% vs 3.1%, P =.056) and new invasive fungal infection (7.3% vs 1.6%, P =.210). Conclusions: This retrospective review showed a reduced duration of ventilatory support in obese patients who received tocilizumab vs baricitinib. In the future, additional studies should be conducted to further examine and confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Anti-cancer treatments often entail a spectrum of adverse effects, and among these, skin cancers have been under significant scrutiny. From traditional immunosuppressants such as methotrexate to chemotherapeutic agents such as fludarabine and hydroxyurea, as well as from new targeted therapies such as ibrutinib and JAK inhibitors to MAP kinase pathway inhibitors and sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors, each treatment modality poses unique mechanisms of action and associated risks of skin cancer. In addition, the role of radiotherapy in inducing secondary skin cancers underscores the long-term consequences of therapeutic interventions. It is crucial to ascertain whether a specific therapy increases the risk of skin cancer so that appropriate screening measures can be implemented before and during treatment. Our comprehensive review not only investigates various medications and treatment modalities linked with heightened skin cancer risks, elucidating their mechanisms of action and relevant properties, but also proposes effective strategies for managing patients undergoing such therapies. Skin cancers involve a significant concern in cancer therapy due to their association with various treatment modalities. This comprehensive review explores the increased risk of skin cancers linked to different anti-cancer treatments, including classic immunosuppressants such as methotrexate (MTX), chemotherapeutic agents such as fludarabine and hydroxyurea (HU), targeted therapies like ibrutinib and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi), mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (MAPKP) inhibitors, sonic hedgehog pathway (SHHP) inhibitors, and radiotherapy. MTX, a widely used immunosuppressant in different fields, is associated with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and cutaneous melanoma (CM), particularly at higher dosages. Fludarabine, HU, and other chemotherapeutic agents increase the risk of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), including cSCC and BCC. Targeted therapies like ibrutinib and JAKi have been linked to an elevated incidence of NMSCs and CM. MAPKP inhibitors, particularly BRAF inhibitors like vemurafenib, are associated with the development of cSCCs and second primary melanomas (SPMs). SHHP inhibitors like vismodegib have been linked to the emergence of cSCCs following treatment for BCC. Additionally, radiotherapy carries carcinogenic risks, especially for BCCs, with increased risks, especially with younger age at the moment of exposure. Understanding these risks and implementing appropriate screening is crucial for effectively managing patients undergoing anti-cancer therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory, pruritic skin disorder, is seen primarily in the pediatric population but can be found among all age groups. The symptoms of AD can cause embarrassment in patients and can interrupt daily activities and productivity, potentially resulting in avoidance of social situations. In addition to nonpharmacologic management, mainstay pharmacologic treatments for AD are topical medications including corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, and topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Promising new drugs—oral JAK inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies—have emerged as new treatment options for moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing inflammatory skin disease with a multifactorial etiology that affects up to 20% of children and up to 7% of adults in the USA. Annual costs are estimated to be greater than $5 billion as of 2015 and have likely increased since. Mild cases can be managed with emollients and topical steroids or non-steroidal medications; however, moderate-to-severe AD is much more difficult to control and typically requires systemic therapy. While historically treatment has involved topical and oral corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive medications, advances in our understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AD has allowed us to develop more precisely targeted therapies for the condition. Specifically, because of the high prevalence and burden on quality of life, many new immunologic therapies are emerging or in development to treat this condition. This article summarizes the existing, upcoming, and failed immunologic-based medications for atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic Dermatitis is the most common eczematous inflammatory skin condition, presenting with lesions that typically appear as poorly demarcated erythematous and scaly papules and plaques. The lesions most commonly occur on flexural surfaces of the knees, elbows, and wrists and are associated with moderate to severe itching. This article focuses on the clinical presentation of atopic dermatitis and treatment options. Other related topics include epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, triggers, and differential diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different tofacitinib citrate tablets formulations among healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions and to observe the safety of test preparation and reference preparation in healthy subjects. Method. This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 64 healthy Chinese subjects (fasting: n = 32, fed: n = 32). The subjects were assigned to receive a single 5-mg dose of the test or a reference tofacitinib citrate tablets. Blood samples were collected at predose and up to 24 hours after dosing. Area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), the area from time zero to infinite (AUC0-∞), and maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) were used for bioequivalence assessment. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, from the time the subject receiving the test drug to the end of the last visit. Results. Under fed condition, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for tofacitinib citrate tablets were 98.40–104.16% for AUC0-t, 89.96–116.70% for C max , and 98.50–104.15% for AUC0-∞. Under fasting condition, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for tofacitinib citrate tablets were 93.65–101.60% for AUC0-t, 90.06–109.15% for C max , and 93.88–101.51% for AUC0-∞. There were no serious events. Conclusion. The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (test/reference) of C max , AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80.00%–125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. They are similar in terms of safety. This trial is registered with CTR20190366. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in treatment-refractory inflammatory myositis in a real-world clinical setting. Methods All patients with refractory inflammatory myositis treated with tofacitinib from a single urban centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, were included from June 2016 to December 2022. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 41 patients were included, 23 with classic DM, 12 with amyopathic DM (ADM) and six with PM phenotype. The patients failed an average of four to five non-steroidal immunosuppressants before initiation of tofacitinib. In the classic DM and ADM group, tofacitinib offered clinically and statistically significant cutaneous improvement. In all myositis patients including the PM phenotype, no meaningful muscle strength response to tofacitinib was observed. 53.7% of the patients discontinued tofacitinib due to lack of benefit or death. Of the 19 patients who remained on tofacitinib at the conclusion of this study, tofacitinib demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in cutaneous disease activity. Conclusion Tofacitinib appears to be highly effective in targeting cutaneous manifestations in classic DM and ADM; however, minimal benefit in muscle strength in the DM or PM phenotype were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream (Opzelura®), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is the first treatment to be approved in several countries for use in patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo. In the identical phase III TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2 trials, significantly more ruxolitinib cream recipients were able to achieve statistically significant and clinically meaningful facial and total body repigmentation, as well as reductions in vitiligo noticeability, compared with vehicle recipients. Efficacy was sustained in longer-term analyses to week 104 of treatment. Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream was generally tolerable in these trials; the most common treatment-related adverse events were acne, pruritus and exfoliation, all at the application site. As with orally administered JAK inhibitors, topical ruxolitinib carries boxed warnings in the USA for serious infections, mortality, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and thrombosis, although the incidences were low with topical application. Thus, topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream is an effective and generally tolerable treatment option for patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo. Plain Language Summary: Non-segmental vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease where the skin throughout the body loses its pigmentation, and is usually managed with topical therapies, light therapy or surgery. Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream (Opzelura®) is the first treatment approved in several countries for patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo. It inhibits Janus kinase (JAK) proteins, reducing the destruction of skin pigment-producing cells. In two clinical trials, significantly more ruxolitinib cream recipients achieved significant and meaningful skin repigmentation compared with patients who received a non-medicated cream; these results were sustained to week 104 of treatment. Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream was generally tolerable; the most common treatment-related adverse events were acne, itchiness and exfoliation, all at the application site. Topical ruxolitinib has special warnings in the USA for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), blood clots, serious infections, death and cancer (associated with the use of oral JAK inhibitors), although incidence rates for these adverse events were low in the clinical trials. Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream is an effective and generally tolerable treatment option for patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by increased itch, skin pain, poor sleep quality, and other symptoms that negatively affect patient quality of life. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, or tyrosine kinase 2, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Methods: Data from two phase III monotherapy trials of upadacitinib (Measure Up 1, NCT03569293; Measure Up 2, NCT03607422) were integrated. Changes in pruritus, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, mental health, and patient impression were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome assessments included the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment. Minimal clinically important differences, achievement of scores representing minimal disease burden, and the change from baseline were evaluated in patients who received upadacitinib through week 52 and in patients who received placebo through week 16. Results: This analysis included 1609 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, N = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, N = 567; placebo, N = 485). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across all arms. The proportion of patients treated with upadacitinib reporting improvements in itch increased rapidly by week 1, increased steadily through week 8, and was sustained through week 52. Patients receiving upadacitinib also experienced improvements in pain and other skin symptoms by week 1, which continued through week 16; improvements were maintained through week 52. Patient reports of improved sleep increased rapidly from baseline to week 1, increased steadily through week 32, and were sustained through week 52. Patients experienced quality-of-life improvements through week 8, which were maintained through week 52. By week 1, patients in both upadacitinib groups experienced rapid improvements in emotional state, and by week 12, patients also achieved meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression. Improvements in mental health continued steadily through week 32 and were maintained through week 52. Patients treated with upadacitinib 30 mg generally experienced improvements in patient-reported outcomes earlier than those treated with upadacitinib 15 mg. Through week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib experienced greater improvements versus those receiving placebo in all assessed patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with once-daily upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg experienced early improvements in itch, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, and mental health that were sustained through week 52. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03569293 (13 August 2018) and NCT03607422 (27 July 2018). Plain Language Summary: Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is a condition that causes painful itchy dry skin, which is burdensome for patients and has a negative impact on quality of life. These symptoms frequently lead to disruption of daily activities such as school and work, decreased self-confidence, social isolation, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance. Symptoms of atopic dermatitis, such as itch and sleep disturbance, can only be assessed by patients. Therefore, it is important to consider patients' perceptions of their symptoms and the related impact on their quality of life, especially when evaluating treatment benefits. Upadacitinib is an orally administered drug approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In two clinical trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2), we investigated how treatment with upadacitinib (15-mg or 30-mg dose) given once daily to adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis would impact their symptoms and quality of life over a 1-year period. We measured changes over time in patients' assessments of itch, pain, other skin-related symptoms, sleep, daily activities, emotional state, mental health, and overall quality of life. Patients treated with upadacitinib experienced improvements in symptoms of atopic dermatitis and quality of life within the first 1–2 weeks of treatment. These improvements continued to steadily increase in the following weeks and lasted through 1 year of treatment. In conclusion, once-daily treatment with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg led to early and lasting improvements in the well-being of patients with atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to identify the crucial genes involved in dental pulp stem cell (DPSC) senescence and evaluate the impact of melatonin on DPSC senescence. Methods: Western blotting, SA‐β‐Gal staining and ALP staining were used to evaluate the senescence and differentiation potential of DPSCs. The optimal concentration of melatonin was determined using the CCK‐8 assay. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in DPSC senescence were obtained via bioinformatics analysis, followed by RT–qPCR. Gain‐ and loss‐of‐function studies were conducted to explore the role of MMP3 in DPSC in vitro expansion and in response to melatonin. GSEA was employed to analyse MMP3‐related pathways in cellular senescence. Results: Treatment with 0.1 μM melatonin attenuated cellular senescence and differentiation potential suppression in DPSCs due to long‐term in vitro expansion. MMP3 was a crucial gene in senescence, as confirmed by bioinformatics analysis, RT–qPCR and Western blotting. Furthermore, gain‐ and loss‐of‐function studies revealed that MMP3 played a regulatory role in cellular senescence. Rescue assays showed that overexpression of MMP3 reversed the effect of melatonin on senescence. GSEA revealed that the MMP3‐dependent anti‐senescence effect of melatonin was associated with the IL6‐JAK‐STAT3, TNF‐α‐Signalling‐VIA‐NF‐κB, COMPLEMENT, NOTCH Signalling and PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR pathways. Conclusion: Melatonin attenuated DPSC senescence caused by long‐term expansion by inhibiting MMP3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis is a common chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease associated with various comorbidities. Managing psoriasis is often challenging as the therapy is decided based on the area of the disease, associated comorbidities and impairment in quality of life, besides the patient's preference. Making progress in the development of new molecules that can be used topically or orally, effectively controlling the disease with minimal side effects and providing long-lasting remissions are the needs of the hour. Recent developments in understanding the complexities of the pathogenesis of psoriasis have resulted in the reinforcement of treatment modalities, leading to the evolution of various biologics and small-molecule inhibitors. In comparison with biologics, both patients and treating physicians prefer small molecules for various reasons such as avoiding injections and side effects that are associated with biologics biologics. Moreover small molecules are economical than biologics. Newer small molecules, both topical and oral, are promising additions to the therapeutic arsenal in the management of psoriasis in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The autoimmune, chronic hair loss known as alopecia areata (AA) is traditionally treated with anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant agents, particularly intralesional, topical or systemic corticosteroids. Their long-term adverse drug events (ADEs) and only moderate efficacy have left many AA-affected patients with few therapy options. The recent approval of the janus kinase inhibitors (JAKIs) baricitinib and ritlecitinib, and a promising pipeline of other JAKIs, monoclonal antibodies and more targeted immune modulators, may alter standard treatment protocols. Clearer understanding of their ADEs, which are the subject of some ongoing trials, is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illnesses and frequently co-occur with other mental and somatic symptoms or disorders. Primary care nurse practitioners (NPs) are key in reducing the treatment gap through early identification, treatment, and/or referral to behavioral health providers. Confronting primary care NPs are problems with time constraints, multiple comorbidities, and limited mental health training, particularly in relation to the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of first-line anxiety disorder medications across age groups. The current article provides a brief summary of evidencebased treatment focusing on pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders in the primary care setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe and identify associated factors for patient–clinician discordance of disease assessment at biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) initiation and over 12 months following initiation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from a US RA registry. Methods: Analyses included CorEvitas RA Registry patients who initiated their first biologic or JAKi on or after February 1, 2015, and had 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up visits. Positive discordance was defined as patient global assessment (visual analog scale [VAS‐100]) minus physician's global assessment (VAS‐100) equal to 30 points or more. Persistent discordance was defined as positive discordance at all three visits. Mixed‐effects logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for positive discordance at initiation and for persistent discordance. Results: Among 2227 first‐time biologic/JAKi‐initiating patients, 613 had both follow‐up visits available and were included in initiation visit analyses, and of these, 163 had positive discordance at initiation and were included in persistent discordance analyses. About 30% of all patients had positive discordance at any visit, and one third of these (10% total) were persistent at all three visits. Multivariable analyses revealed that worse scores on the Clinical Disease Activity Index, greater patient‐reported pain and fatigue, and greater functional impairment were associated with positive discordance at the time of therapy initiation. Being disabled versus working full‐time and being female were associated with higher odds and having Medicare versus no insurance was associated with lower odds of having persistent positive discordance. Conclusion: Results suggest positive discordance is common among real‐world patients with RA initiating their first biologic or JAKi. The identified risk factors associated with patient–clinician discordance will help clinicians foster a more patient‐centric discussion in treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the case of a patient with systemic sclerosis treated with the Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) filgotinib who developed central retinal vein and cilioretinary artery occlusion in the eye. Topics discussed include visual loss suffered by the patient, the thrombotic and cardiovascular adverse effects of JAKi, and the European Medicines Agency's guidance with the use of JAKi in older patients and patients with risk of cardiovascular events and malignancies.

Background. Janus-activated kinase 2 (JAK2) plays a pivotal role in numerous essential biological processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis in human cells. Prior studies have indicated that inhibiting JAK2 could be a promising strategy to mitigate cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in tumor cells. Objectives. This study aimed to estimate the binding affinity of 79 herbal compounds, comprising 46 flavonoids, 21 anthraquinones, and 12 cinnamic acids, to the ATP-binding cleft of JAK2 to identify potential herbal inhibitors of JAK2. Methods. The binding affinities between ligands and JAK2 were calculated utilizing AutoDock 4.0 software in conjunction with the Cygwin environment. Cross-validation was conducted using the Schrödinger tool. Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to evaluate the stability of docked poses for the most significant JAK2 inhibitors. Furthermore, the Discovery Studio Visualizer tool was utilized to elucidate interactions between the top-ranked JAK2 inhibitors and residues within the JAK2 ATP-binding site. Results. Twelve flavonoids, two anthraquinones, and three cinnamic acids demonstrated substantial binding affinities to the protein kinase domain of the receptor, with a criterion of Δ G binding < −10 kcal/mol. Among the studied flavonoids, anthraquinones, and cinnamic acid derivatives, orientin, chlorogenic acid, and pulmatin emerged as the most potent JAK2 inhibitors, exhibiting Δ G binding scores of −14.49, −11.87, and −10.76 kcal/mol, respectively. Furthermore, the docked poses of orientin, pulmatin, and chlorogenic acid remained stable throughout 60 ns computer simulations. The average root mean square deviation values calculated for JAK2 when complexed with orientin, chlorogenic acid, and pulmatin were 2.04 Å, 2.06 Å, and 1.95 Å, respectively. Conclusion. This study underscores the robust inhibitory potential of orientin, pulmatin, and chlorogenic acid against JAK2. The findings hold promise for the development of novel and effective drugs for cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity is a major global health epidemic that has adverse effects on both the people affected as well as the cost to society. Several anti-obesity drugs that target GLP-1 receptors have recently come to the market. Here, we describe the effects of tesofensine, a novel anti-obesity drug that acts as a triple monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitor. Using various techniques, we investigated its effects on weight loss and underlying neuronal mechanisms in mice and rats. These include behavioral tasks, DeepLabCut videotaped analysis, electrophysiological ensemble recordings, optogenetic activation, and chemogenetic silencing of GABAergic neurons in the Lateral Hypothalamus (LH). We found that tesofensine induces a greater weight loss in obese rats than lean rats, while differentially modulating the neuronal ensembles and population activity in LH. In Vgat-ChR2 and Vgat-IRES-cre transgenic mice, we found for the first time that tesofensine inhibited a subset of LH GABAergic neurons, reducing their ability to promote feeding behavior, and chemogenetically silencing them enhanced tesofensine's food-suppressing effects. Unlike phentermine, a dopaminergic appetite suppressant, tesofensine causes few, if any, head-weaving stereotypy at therapeutic doses. Most importantly, we found that tesofensine prolonged the weight loss induced by 5-HTP, a serotonin precursor, and blocked the body weight rebound that often occurs after weight loss. Behavioral studies on rats with the tastant sucrose indicated that tesofensine's appetite suppressant effects are independent of taste aversion and do not directly affect the perception of sweetness or palatability of sucrose. In summary, our data provide new insights into the effects of tesofensine on weight loss and the underlying neuronal mechanisms, suggesting that tesofensine may be an effective treatment for obesity and that it may be a valuable adjunct to other appetite suppressants to prevent body weight rebound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As an autoimmune disease, the persistent systemic inflammatory response associated with connective tissue disease (CTD) is involved in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, clinical data showed that the risk of VTE in patients differed between subtypes of CTD, suggesting that different subtypes may have independent mechanisms to promote the development of VTE, but the specific mechanism lacks sufficient research at present. The development of pulmonary fibrosis also contributes to the development of VTE, and therefore, patients with CTD-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) may be at higher risk of VTE than patients with CTD alone or patients with ILD alone. In addition, the activation of the coagulation cascade response will drive further progression of the patient's pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis, which will continue to increase the patient's risk of VTE and adversely affect prognosis. Currently, the treatment for CTD-ILD is mainly immunosuppressive and antirheumatic therapy, such as the use of glucocorticoids and janus kinase-inhibitors (JAKis), but, paradoxically, these drugs are also involved in the formation of patients' coagulation tendency, making the clinical treatment of CTD-ILD patients with a higher risk of developing VTE challenging. In this article, we review the potential risk factors and related mechanisms for the development of VTE in CTD-ILD patients to provide a reference for clinical treatment and prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitis represent a group of severe rare skin diseases. While glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents serve as standard treatments for these diseases, their efficacy is limited due to adverse side effects, indicating the need for alternative approaches. Biologics have been used in the management of some rare skin diseases. However, the use of biologics is associated with concerns, such as infection risk and high costs, prompting the quest for efficacious and cost-effective alternatives. This study discusses the safety issues associated with tofacitinib and its potential in treating rare skin diseases. Methods: This narrative review focuses on the pharmacodynamic properties of tofacitinib and its impact on the JAK/STAT pathway. In addition, we present a comprehensive discussion of the effects and mechanism of action of tofacitinib for each severe rare skin disease. Results: This role of tofacitinib in treating severe rare skin diseases has been discussed, shedding light on its promising prospects as a treatment modality. Few reports of serious adverse events are available in patients treated with tofacitinib. Conclusion: We explored the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety considerations of tofacitinib and found that it can be used as a treatment option for rare skin diseases. However, multicenter clinical studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on numerous treatment guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology and EULAR encourage shared decision. Topics include low health and numeric literacy are prevalent barriers to effectively informing patients and may disproportionately affect vulnerable populations; and heuristics illustrating the impact risk communication using data from the Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance trial.

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy / Journal Canadien de la Pharmacie Hospitalière is the property of Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: Treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend targeting low disease activity or remission and switching therapies for patients not reaching those targets. We evaluated real‐world use of disease activity measures, treatment discontinuation, and switching patterns among patients with RA initiating a first‐line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Methods: Data from adult patients with RA initiating a first‐line TNFi were collected from the American Rheumatology Network (January 2014–August 2021). The proportion of patients with recorded disease activity scores (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) at TNFi initiation was assessed. Among patients with moderate or severe RA at TNFi initiation, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent advanced therapy were evaluated. Results: Among TNFi initiators (n = 15,182), 44.8% recorded a CDAI/RAPID3 score at treatment initiation; of those who did not, 47.0% had recorded a tender and/or swollen joint count or pain score. Among patients with moderate or severe RA (n = 1,651), 52% discontinued their initial TNFi during follow‐up, of which 15%, 46%, 28%, and 12% initiated the same TNFi, another TNFi, a non‐TNFi biologic, or a Janus kinase inhibitor, respectively. The proportion of patients restarting the same TNFi or initiating another TNFi varied according to TNFi discontinuation reason. Conclusion: In clinical practice, over half of patients with RA initiating a first‐line TNFi did not have baseline disease activity assessments. Many patients cycled through TNFi despite citing lack of efficacy as the most common reason for discontinuation. Consistent, objective monitoring of treatment response and timely switch to effective therapy is needed in patients with RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of tinengotinib (TT-00420), a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFRs 1-3), Janus kinase 1/2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and Aurora A/B, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients received tinengotinib orally daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation was guided by Bayesian modeling using escalation with overdose control. The primary objective was to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Results Forty-eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation, n  = 40; dose expansion, n  = 8). MTD was not reached; DRDE was 12 mg daily. DLTs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8 mg, n  = 1) and hypertension (15 mg, n  = 2). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (50.0%). In 43 response-evaluable patients, 13 (30.2%) achieved partial response (PR; n  = 7) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks (n  = 6), including 4/11 (36.4%) with FGFR2 mutations/fusions and cholangiocarcinoma (PR n  = 3; SD ≥ 24 weeks n  = 1), 3/3 (100.0%) with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (PR n  = 2; SD ≥ 24 weeks n  = 1), 2/5 (40.0%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; PR n  = 1; SD ≥ 24 weeks n  = 1), and 1/1 (100.0%) with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC; PR). Four of 12 patients (33.3%; HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, TNBC, prostate cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma) treated at DRDE had PRs. Tinengotinib's half-life was 28-34 hours. Conclusions Tinengotinib was well tolerated with favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics. Preliminary findings indicated potential clinical benefit in FGFR inhibitor-refractory cholangiocarcinoma, HER2-negative breast cancer (including TNBC), and CRPC. Continued evaluation of tinengotinib is warranted in phase II trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]