Search

Background: Despite increasing availability of rapid molecular tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in high-burden settings, many people with tuberculosis are undiagnosed. Reliance on sputum as the primary specimen for tuberculosis diagnostics contributes to this diagnostic gap. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and additive yield of a novel stool quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in three countries in Africa with high tuberculosis burdens., Methods: We undertook a prospective diagnostic accuracy study in Eswatini, Mozambique, and Tanzania from Sept 21, 2020, to Feb 2, 2023, to compare the diagnostic accuracy for tuberculosis of a novel stool qPCR test with the current diagnostic standard for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection from sputum and stool, Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra). Sputum, stool, and urine samples were provided by a cohort of participants, aged 10 years or older, diagnosed with tuberculosis. Participants with tuberculosis (cases) were enrolled within 72 h of treatment initiation for tuberculosis diagnosed clinically or following laboratory confirmation. Participants without tuberculosis (controls) consisted of household contacts of the cases who did not develop tuberculosis during a 6-month follow-up. The performance was compared with a robust composite microbiological reference standard (CMRS)., Findings: The cohort of adolescents and adults (n=408) included 268 participants with confirmed or clinical tuberculosis (cases), 147 (55%) of whom were living with HIV, and 140 participants (controls) without tuberculosis. The sensitivity of the novel stool qPCR was 93·7% (95% CI 87·4-97·4) compared with participants with detectable growth on M tuberculosis culture, and 88·1% (81·3-93·0) compared with sputum Xpert Ultra. The stool qPCR had an equivalent sensitivity as sputum Xpert Ultra (94·8%, 89·1-98·1) compared with culture. Compared with the CMRS, the sensitivity of the stool qPCR was higher than the current standard for tuberculosis diagnostics on stool, Xpert Ultra (80·4%, 73·4-86·2 vs 73·5%, 66·0-80·1; p=0·025 on paired comparison). The qPCR also identified 17-21% additional tuberculosis cases compared to sputum Xpert Ultra or sputum culture. In controls without tuberculosis, the specificity of the stool qPCR was 96·9% (92·2-99·1)., Interpretation: In this study, a novel qPCR for the diagnosis of tuberculosis from stool specimens had a higher accuracy in adolescents and adults than the current diagnostic PCR gold standard on stool, Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra, and equivalent sensitivity to Xpert-MTB/RIF Ultra on sputum., Funding: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and NIH Fogarty International Center., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CL has received funding for this work from the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF); consulting fees from Insmed; and speakers' honoraria from Insmed, Gilead, GSK, and Janssen outside of the scope of this work. AMM has received honoraria from Janssen for participation in a data and safety monitoring board outside of the scope of this work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Multidrug-resistant(MDR) tuberculosis in Southern Africa is of great concern, exacerbated by the spread of a clone harboring a mutation missed by Xpert Ultra. In Southern Mozambique, the presence of such mutation and rising cases of non-MDR isoniazid resistance highlights the need to ensure accurate detection of antimicrobial-resistance in the country., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. I. C. received consultancy fees from Foundation for innovative new diagnostics for the development of the WHO mutation catalogue v1. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of mortality worldwide. Children and people living with HIV (PLHIV) have an increased risk of mortality, particularly in the absence of rapid diagnosis. The main challenges of diagnosing TB in these populations are due to the unspecific and paucibacillary disease presentation and the difficulty of obtaining respiratory samples. Thus, novel diagnostic strategies, based on non-respiratory specimens could improve clinical decision making and TB outcomes in high burden TB settings. We propose a multi-country, prospective diagnostic evaluation study with a nested longitudinal cohort evaluation to assess the performance of a new stool-based qPCR, developed by researchers at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, Texas, USA) for TB bacteriological confirmation with promising results in pilot studies., Methods: The study will take place in high TB/HIV burden countries (Mozambique, Eswatini and Uganda) where we will enroll, over a period of 30 months, 650 PLHIV (> 15) and 1295 children under 8 years of age (irrespective of HIV status) presenting pressumptive TB. At baseline, all participants will provide clinical history, complete a physical assessment, and undergo thoracic chest X-ray imaging. To obtain bacteriological confirmation, participants will provide respiratory samples (1 for adults, 2 in children) and 1 stool sample for Xpert Ultra MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) liquid culture will only be performed in respiratory samples and lateral flow lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) in urine following WHO recommendations. Participants will complete 2 months follow-up if they are not diagnosed with TB, and 6 months if they are. For analytical purposes, the participants in the pediatric cohort will be classified into "confirmed tuberculosis", "unconfirmed tuberculosis" and "unlikely tuberculosis". Participants of the adult cohort will be classified as "bacteriologically confirmed TB", "clinically diagnosed TB" or "not TB". We will assess accuracy of the novel qPCR test compared to bacteriological confirmation and Tb diagnosis irrespective of laboratory results. Longitudinal qPCR results will be analyzed to assess its use as treatment response monitoring., Discussion: The proposed stool-based qPCR is an innovation because both the strategy of using a non-sputum based sample and a technique specially designed to detect M.tb DNA in stool., Protocol Registration Details: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05047315., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Prompt diagnosis is critical for tuberculosis (TB) control, as it enables early treatment which in turn, reduces transmission and improves treatment outcomes. We investigated the impact on TB diagnosis of introducing Xpert Ultra as the frontline diagnostic test, combined with an innovative active-case finding (ACF) strategy (based on Xpert Ultra semi-quantitative results and spatial parameters), in a semi-rural district of Southern Mozambique. From January-December 2018 we recruited incident TB-cases (index cases, ICs) and their household contacts (HCs). Recruitment of close community contacts (CCs) depended on IC´s Xpert Ultra results, and the population density of their area. TB-contacts, either symptomatic or people living with HIV, were asked to provide a spot sputum for lab-testing. Trends on TB case notification were compared to the previous years and to those of two districts in the south of the Maputo province (control area), using an interrupted time series analysis with and without control (CITS/ITS). A total of 1010 TB ICs (37.1% laboratory-confirmed) were recruited; 3165 HCs and 4730 CCs were screened for TB. Eighty-nine additional TB cases were identified through the ACF intervention (52.8% laboratory-confirmed). The intervention increased by 8.2% all forms of TB cases detected in 2018. Xpert Ultra trace positive results accounted for a high proportion of laboratory confirmations in the ACF cohort (51.1% vs 13.7% of those passively diagnosed). The Number Needed to Screen to find a TB case differed widely among HCs (55) and CCs (153). During the intervention period, a reversal of the previous negative trend in lab-confirmed case notifications was observed in the district. However, the CITS model did not show any statistically significant difference compared to the control area. Paediatric population benefited the most from the ACF strategy and HCs screening seemed an effective intervention to find microbiological confirmed cases in early stages of the disease., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Saavedra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

In several low-income countries, the transport of sputa could take up to one week to reach the laboratories, resulting in increased contamination rates and a loss of growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the OMNIgene-SPUTUM in preserving Mycobacterium tuberculosis on sputum samples simulating three hypothetical scenarios for conservation and/or decontamination: (1) sputum was mixed with OMN and conserved at room temperature for five days and then processed for culture (OMN); (2) sputum cultures followed the routine standing operating procedure at day 0 (STD); and (3) sputum samples were kept at room temperature for five days and mixed with the standard decontamination reagent (SDT5) and then processed for culture. The positivity rate based on smear microscopy was 36.4%, 29.1%, and 27.3% for STD, STD5, and OMN, respectively. The proportion of positive results by liquid culture (MGIT) was 39.1% (43/110) for STD, 26.4% (29/110) for STD5, and 20.0% for OMN (22/110). The overall concordance of liquid culture results was 51.8% (57/110): 37.3% (41/110) for negative results, 11.8% (13/110) for MTBC growth, and 2.7% (3/110) for contaminated results. The OMN arm showed better performance in solid culture than in liquid culture, with a notable reduction in contaminated results.

The WHO recommends preventive treatment for all pediatric contacts of a confirmed TB case, but coverage remains low in many high TB burden countries. We aimed to assess the coverage and adherence of the isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) program among children under 5 years of age with household exposure to an adult pulmonary TB case in a rural district of Southern Mozambique. The estimated IPT coverage was 11.7%. A longer distance to the health center and lower age of the children hindered IPT initiation. Among patients who started IPT, 12/18 (69.9%) were adherent to the 6-month treatment., (© The Author(s) [2023]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: We present a field evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF ("Xpert") and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ("Ultra") using two cohorts in a high tuberculosis/HIV burden setting in Southern Mozambique., Methods: Single respiratory specimens from symptomatic adults accessing healthcare services (passive case finding (PCF) cohort) and from household and community close contacts (active case finding (ACF) cohort) were tested by smear microscopy, culture, Xpert and Ultra. Liquid and solid culture served as a composite reference standard. We explored the impact of trace results on specificity via their recategorisation to negative (in all and just among those previously treated individuals)., Results: 1419 and 252 participants were enrolled in the PCF and ACF cohorts, respectively. For the PCF cohort, Ultra showed higher sensitivity than Xpert overall (0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) versus 0.88 (96% CI 0.82-0.93); p<0.001) and among smear-negative patients (0.84 (96% CI 0.71-0.93) versus 0.63 (96% CI 0.48-0.76)). Ultra's specificity was lower than Xpert's (0.96 (96% CI 0.95-0.97) versus 0.98 (96% CI 0.97-0.99); p=0.008). For ACF, sensitivities were the same (0.67 (95% CI 0.22-0.96) for both tests), although Ultra detected a higher number of microbiologically confirmed samples than Xpert (4.7% (12 out of 252) versus 2.7% (seven out of 252)). Conditional recategorisation of trace results among previously treated participants maintained differences in specificity in the PCF cohort., Conclusion: These results add evidence on the improved sensitivity of Ultra and support its use in different case finding scenarios., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B. Saavedra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Mambuque has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Nguenha has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Gomes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Munguambe has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.I. Garcia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Izco has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Acacio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Murias-Closas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Cossa has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Losada has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Pernas-Pardavila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Oliveras has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Theron has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.L. García-Basteiro has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Strengthening tuberculosis diagnosis is an international priority and the advocacy for multi-disease testing devices raises the possibility of improving laboratory efficiency. However, the advantages of centralized platforms might not translate into real improvements under operational conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the field use of the Abbott RealTime MTB (RT-MTB) and Xpert MTB/RIF assays, in a large cohort of HIV-positive and TB presumptive cases in Southern Mozambique. Over a 6-month period, 255 HIV-positive TB presumptive cases were consecutively recruited in the high TB/HIV burden district of Manhiça. The diagnostic performance of both assays was evaluated against two different reference standards: a microbiological gold standard (MGS) and a composite reference standard (CRS). Results from the primary analysis (MGS) showed improved sensitivity (Se) and reduced specificity (Sp) for the Abbott RT-MTB assay compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF (RT-MTB Se: 0.92 (95% CI: 0.75;0.99) vs Xpert Se: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.52;0.88) p value = 0.06; RT-MTB Sp: 0.80 (0.72;0.86) vs Xpert Sp: 0.96 (0.92;0.99) p value < 0.001). The lower specificity may be due to cross-reactivity with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTMs), the detection of non-viable MTBC, or the identification of true TB cases missed by the gold standard., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Four decades after the Alma-Ata Declaration, strengthening primary health care (PHC) remains a priority for health systems, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Given the prominence of chronic diseases as a global health issue, PHC must include a wide range of components in order to provide adequate care., Objective: To assess PHC preparedness to provide chronic care in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru, we used, as 'tracer conditions', diabetes, hypertension and a country-specific neglected tropical disease with chronic sequelae in each country., Methods: By implementing a health system assessment, we collected quantitative and qualitative data from primary and secondary sources, including interviews of key informants at three health-system levels (macro, meso and micro). The World Health Organization's health-system building blocks provided the basis for content analysis., Results: In total, we conducted 227 interviews. Our findings show that the ambitious policies targeting specific diseases lack the support of technical, administrative and financial resources. Data collection systems do not allow the monitoring of individual patients or provide the health system with the information it requires. Patients receive limited disease-specific information. Clinical guidelines and training are either non-existent or not adapted to local contexts. Availability of medicines and diagnostic tests at the PHC level is an issue. Although medicines available through the public health care system are affordable, some essential medicines suffer shortages or are not available to PHC providers. This need, along with a lack of clear referral procedures and available transportation, generates financial issues for individuals and affects access to health care., Conclusion: PHC in these LMICs is not well prepared to provide adequate care for chronic diseases. Improving PHC to attain universal health coverage requires strengthening the identified weaknesses across health-system building blocks.