Back to Search Start Over

Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis diagnosis in the context of passive and active case finding.

Authors :
Saavedra B
Mambuque E
Nguenha D
Gomes N
Munguambe S
García JI
Izco S
Acacio S
Murias-Closas A
Cossa M
Losada I
Pernas-Pardavila H
Oliveras L
Theron G
García-Basteiro AL
Source :
The European respiratory journal [Eur Respir J] 2021 Dec 23; Vol. 58 (6). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 23 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: We present a field evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF ("Xpert") and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ("Ultra") using two cohorts in a high tuberculosis/HIV burden setting in Southern Mozambique.<br />Methods: Single respiratory specimens from symptomatic adults accessing healthcare services (passive case finding (PCF) cohort) and from household and community close contacts (active case finding (ACF) cohort) were tested by smear microscopy, culture, Xpert and Ultra. Liquid and solid culture served as a composite reference standard. We explored the impact of trace results on specificity via their recategorisation to negative (in all and just among those previously treated individuals).<br />Results: 1419 and 252 participants were enrolled in the PCF and ACF cohorts, respectively. For the PCF cohort, Ultra showed higher sensitivity than Xpert overall (0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) versus 0.88 (96% CI 0.82-0.93); p<0.001) and among smear-negative patients (0.84 (96% CI 0.71-0.93) versus 0.63 (96% CI 0.48-0.76)). Ultra's specificity was lower than Xpert's (0.96 (96% CI 0.95-0.97) versus 0.98 (96% CI 0.97-0.99); p=0.008). For ACF, sensitivities were the same (0.67 (95% CI 0.22-0.96) for both tests), although Ultra detected a higher number of microbiologically confirmed samples than Xpert (4.7% (12 out of 252) versus 2.7% (seven out of 252)). Conditional recategorisation of trace results among previously treated participants maintained differences in specificity in the PCF cohort.<br />Conclusion: These results add evidence on the improved sensitivity of Ultra and support its use in different case finding scenarios.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B. Saavedra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Mambuque has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Nguenha has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Gomes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Munguambe has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.I. Garcia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Izco has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Acacio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Murias-Closas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Cossa has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Losada has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Pernas-Pardavila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Oliveras has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Theron has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.L. García-Basteiro has nothing to disclose.<br /> (Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1399-3003
Volume :
58
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The European respiratory journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34140293
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00257-2021