Search

Due to advances in cardiac surgery, perioperative care and transcatheter interventions, the majority of infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) now survive and reach adulthood. Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) is considered the primary imaging modality in evaluation of patients with CHD. However, in adults it can be limited due to several reasons. Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is extremely useful in evaluating cardiac morphology and function, it is not widely available, takes a long time to obtain images, and cannot be done in severely ill patients or patients that have claustrophobia. Due to high spatial and temporal resolution, isotropic imaging fast imaging and wide availability, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as an excellent alternative modality in the evaluation of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). It can be performed on patients with hardware and those with claustrophobia, due to shorter image acquisition time. In this article, the commonly encountered congenital heart disorders in adults are reviewed, whether incidentally discovered on a computed tomography (CT), on a CT done to evaluate sequela of unknown CHD, or known treated CHD. To appropriately perform and evaluate CT imaging for postoperative correction or palliation congenital heart disease in adults, the imager should know the detailed cardiac anatomy, details of the operative technique used, and be familiar with the common short and long term post-operative complications.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) image quality can be degraded by artifact in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). We aimed to establish a clinical risk score, so patient selection for diagnostic CMR could be optimised.In this retrospective cohort study, CMRs performed for clinical use in subjects with CIED from January 2016 to May 2019 were reviewed. Subject anthropometry, CIED generator/lead specifications and pre-scan chest X-ray (CXR) measurements were collected. Generator-related artifact size was measured on axial steady state free precession images. Interpretability of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was performed based on a three-grade visual score attributed to each of 17 myocardial segments.Fifty-seven (57) patients (59±16 years, 74% male) fitted the inclusion criteria. Artifact precluded left ventricle (LV) evaluation (≥5 segments) in 17 (30%). Artifact was more common with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, related to generator volume, mass, height, width, thickness, and area, along with right ventricular (RV) lead length and diameter (all p0.05). Artifact was associated with distance from generator to LV apex, generator to RV lead tip and shortest distance from generator to heart on CXR (all p0.05). On multivariable regression modelling, RV lead diameter (OR 5.861, 95% CI 1.866-18.407, p=0.002) and distance from generator to LV apex (OR 0.693, 95% CI 0.511-0.940, p=0.019) were independent predictors of artifact. Multivariable predictors were used to develop Device Related CMR Artifact Prediction Score (DR-CAPS), where all patients with DR-CAPS=0 had fully interpretable LGE imaging.Simple, readily available measures, such as lead characteristics and pre-scan CXR measures, can stratify patients via an artifact prediction score to optimise selection for diagnostic CMR.

The Warden procedure is one of the most common techniques for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR), involving transection and reanastomosis of the superior vena cava (SVC) to the right atrial appendage and baffling of the anomalous pulmonary veins through the atrial septal defect. While the procedure is typically well-tolerated in pediatric patients, adult patients requiring surgical correction of PAPVR are uncommon. The authors report a case of a 33-year-old woman who developed SVC syndrome as a delayed complication of the Warden procedure. Keywords: Cardiac, Congenital, Complications © RSNA, 2022

BACKGROUND: Imaging plays a key role in the workup of patients with clinically suspected fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), and research has highlighted the potential of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in screening for thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic arterial abnormalities in these patients. We sought to evaluate imaging findings from patients with suspected or diagnosed FMD who underwent screening CTA at our institution with a novel single-acquisition protocol that offers increased anatomic coverage, with images obtained from the skull vertex to the pelvis. METHODS: Images from 80 consecutive patients scanned with the novel single-session CTA protocol covering the skull vertex to the pelvis were compared with images from 20 additional consecutive patients who underwent CTA for the head and neck separate from CTA of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. RESULTS: Compared with CTA performed in separate sessions, the single-session CTA protocol decreased the radiation dose by 38% (P

There is a plethora of cardiovascular devices used for therapy and monitoring, and newer devices are being introduced constantly. As a result of advancement of medical technology and rapid development of such technology to address unmet needs across cardiovascular care, multiple conditions which were previously treated surgically or with medications now benefit from trans-catheter device-based evaluation and management. Moreover, innovation to existing technology has transformed the structural design of many traditional cardiovascular devices, making them safer and enabling easier deployment within the chest (catheter-based versus surgical). A post-procedure chest radiography (CXR) is often the first routine imaging test ordered in these patients. A CXR is a relatively inexpensive and noninvasive imaging tool, which can be obtained at the patient’s bedside if needed. Commonly implanted cardiovascular devices can be quite easily checked for appropriate positioning on routine CXRs. Potential complications associated with mal-positioning of such devices may be life-threatening. Such complications often manifest early on CXRs and may not be readily apparent on clinical examination. Prompt recognition of such abnormal radiographic appearances is critical for timely diagnosis and effective management. Clinicians need to be familiar with new devices in order to assess proper placement and identify complications related to mal-positioning. This pictorial essay aims to describe the radiologic appearances of contemporary cardiovascular devices, review indications for their usage and potential complications, and discuss magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility.

Objectives This study sought to retrospectively investigate outcomes of lead extraction by using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to identify risk of complicated lead extraction to aid in pre-procedural planning. Background Transvenous lead extractions remain high-risk procedures requiring specialized operators, equipment, and surgical backup. Data are lacking for how to identify difficult lead extractions. CT scans, which can illustrate the proximity of the lead to adherent venous structures can potentially aid in identifying difficult lead extractions. Methods All cases of patients who were undergoing transvenous lead extractions at the authors’ institution between 2015 and 2018, who had a pre-operative CT scan prior to lead extraction, were reviewed. The images were retrospectively reviewed to examine adherence of leads to the surrounding vein and obtained procedural outcomes. Results A total of 203 cases were reviewed of patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction who had a pre-operative CT scan, and scans were separated based on lead location in the superior vena cava, as assessed by CT imaging. Scans were divided into 3 groups: those in a central location or 1 cm (n = 137); or those that had at least 1 lead outside the vein contour (n = 38). Although there was only 1 serious complication requiring vascular surgery intervention, patients with at least 1 lead outside the vein contour required significantly longer procedural time (190.8 ± 86.6 min vs. 158.1 ± 73.7 min vs. 142.8 ± 52.2 min; p = 0.019) and fluoroscopy time (33.1 ± 24.2 min vs. 19.6 ± 18.4 min vs. 18.3 ± 16.4 min; p = 0.0006) than those with leads adhering >1 cm and centrally located leads, respectively. Conclusions Pre-operative CT scanning can identify difficult lead extractions prior to performing the procedure. This information may aid electrophysiologists in the planning of extraction procedures. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.