Search

Introduction: Since boar spermatozoa show a marked deterioration in sperm quality when cooled, insemination doses are usually stored at 16-18 °C. However, maintaining this temperature during transport of semen doses is challenging, particularly during the summer months. An alternative could be to store the doses at 4 °C if cold-shock to the sperm could be prevented. The objective of this study was to evaluate boar sperm quality and fertility in in vitro fertilization after storage in AndroStar Premium at 4 °C for 1 week. Methods: Insemination doses (n =9) in AndroStar Premium from a commercial boar semen collection station were transported to the laboratory at approximately 20 °C. At the laboratory, sperm quality evaluation and was preformed and each dose was split; half of each ejaculate was stored in a climate-controlled box at 16-18 °C, the other was slowly cooled to 4 °C. Both samples were stored for 1 week before further sperm quality evaluation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) were performed. Mean values were tested using generalized linear regression, with treatment and boar as fixed factors; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Sperm membrane integrity (mean±sem: 91±0.05 and 83±0.09% for 16 and 4 °C, respectively) and superoxide production (6.79±2.37 and 13.54±6.23% for 16 and 4 °C, respectively), were different between treatments. The DNA fragmentation index was lower in cold-stored samples than in conventionally stored samples (3.74±2.25 and 7.40±3.36% for 4 and 16 °C, respectively). The numbers of oocytes developing to blastocyst on Day 6 (mean±sd: 9.0±8.0 and 6.0±5.0%, for storage at 16 and 4 °C, respectively) were not different between treatments. Discussion: Therefore, storage of boar semen doses in AndroStar Premium at 4 °C for up to 7days would be a viable alternative to current praxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High testosterone levels might be associated with coarser fiber in alpacas, a [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Semen possesses unique microbiota that are distinct from other microbial populations, such as those in the piglet gut and sow vagina. Environmental variations can result in alterations in the bacterial composition, which might not be detrimental but instead could be essential for sustaining optimal sperm functionality. The present study investigated the seminal microbiota in boars in relation to sperm quality. We found a negative linear relationship between the dominant bacterial orders, specifically potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillales) and harmful bacteria (Enterobacterales). Moreover, the abundance of potential probiotic functional bacteria was more frequently observed in high-quality ejaculates. Differences in the abundance of specific small subsets of microbes and their interactions revealed more precise effects on sperm quality than the overall seminal bacterial content (CFU/mL). The findings suggest that alterations in the seminal microbiome are significantly associated with the quality of boar semen, and strategies to increase the richness of functional candidates such as Lactobacillus spp. through herd management practices (e.g., seasonal changes, feeding, microbial exposure, antibiotics, and probiotics use) could create favorable reproductive potentials. The present study was carried out to determine the seminal microbiota of boars and their correlation with sperm quality. A total of 17 ejaculates were collected from 17 Duroc boars and were classified according to sperm quality into two groups: low-quality (n = 8) and high-quality (n = 9). Each ejaculate was subjected to (i) semen evaluation, (ii) bacterial culture and MALDI-TOF identification, and (iii) 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatic analyses. No difference in the total bacterial count, alpha diversity, and beta diversity between the high-quality group and the low-quality group was detected (p > 0.05). While Globicatella sanguinis was negatively correlated with sperm quality (p < 0.05), Delftia acidovorans was positively correlated with sperm quality (p < 0.05). Lactobacillales (25.2%; LB) and Enterobacterales (10.3%; EB) were the most dominant bacteria and negatively correlated: EB = 507.3 − 0.5 × LB, R2 = 0.24, p < 0.001. Moreover, the abundance of Escherichia-shigella was negatively correlated with LB (r = −0.754, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with Proteus (r = 0.533, p < 0.05). Alysiella was positively correlated with Lactobacillus (r = 0.485, p < 0.05), Prevotella (r = 0.622, p < 0.01), and Staphylococcus (r = 0.489, p < 0.05). In conclusion, seminal microbiota is significantly associated with boar semen qualities. The distributions of the most dominant bacterial genera, the differences in the abundance of small subset microbes, and their correlation appear to have far more impact than the overall seminal bacterial content (e.g., total bacterial count, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) on sperm quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]