1. Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease
- Author
-
Slart, RHJA, Bax, JJ, de Jong, RM, de Boer, J, Lamb, HJ, Mook, PH, Willemsen, ATM, Vaalburg, W, van Veldhuisen, DJ, Jager, PL, Cardiovascular Centre (CVC), Vascular Ageing Programme (VAP), and Translational Immunology Groningen (TRIGR)
- Subjects
QUANTITATION ,left ventricular ejection fraction ,WALL-MOTION ,left ventricular volumes ,EJECTION FRACTION ,POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY ,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SPECT ,gated F-18-FDG PET ,MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ,COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ,REVASCULARIZATION ,FDG-PET ,regional wall motion ,MRI ,VOLUMES - Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare left ventricular (LV) volumes and regional wall motion determined by PET with those determined by the reference technique, cardiovascular MRI. Methods: LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured and regional wall motion was scored in 38 patients with chronic coronary artery disease by both gated F-18-FDG PET and MRI. A 9-segment model was used for PET and MRI to assess regional wall motion. Results: Good correlations were observed between MRI and gated PET for all parameters (r values ranging from 0.91 to 0.96). With PET, there was a significant but small underestimation of LVEDV and LVEF. Mean+/-SD LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF for MRI were 131+/-57 mL, 91+/-12 mL, and 33%+/-12%, respectively, and those for gated PET were 117+/-56 mL, 85+/-51 mL, and 30%+/-11%, respectively. For regional wall motion, an agreement of 85% was found, with a kappa-statistic of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.89; SE, 0.049). Conclusion: LV volumes, LVEF, and regional wall motion can be assessed with gated F-18-FDG PET and correlate well with these parameters assessed by MRI.
- Published
- 2004