Search

Summary Background Pompe disease is a rare disorder characterised by progressive loss of muscle and respiratory function due to acid α-glucosidase deficiency. Enzyme replacement therapy with recombinant human acid α-glucosidase, alglucosidase alfa, is the first approved treatment for the disease, but some patients do not respond, and many do not show a sustained benefit. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an investigational two-component therapy (cipaglucosidase alfa, a novel recombinant human acid α-glucosidase, plus miglustat, an enzyme stabiliser) for late-onset Pompe disease. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial at 62 neuromuscular and metabolic medical centres in 24 countries in the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with late-onset Pompe disease, and had either been receiving alglucosidase alfa for at least 2 years or were enzyme replacement therapy-naive. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) using interactive response technology software, stratified by 6-min walk distance and previous enzyme replacement therapy status, to intravenous cipaglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg) plus oral miglustat or to intravenous alglucosidase alfa (20 mg/kg) plus oral placebo once every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Patients, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 52 in 6-min walk distance, assessed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures analysis for comparison of superiority in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug). This study is now complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03729362 . Findings Between Dec 3, 2018, and Nov 26, 2019, 130 patients were screened for eligibility and 125 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (n=85) or alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (n=40). Two patients in the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group did not receive any dose due to absence of genotype confirmation of late-onset Pompe disease and were excluded from analysis. Six patients discontinued (one in the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group, five in the cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat group), and 117 completed the study. At week 52, mean change from baseline in 6-min walk distance was 20·8 m (SE 4·6) in the cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat group versus 7·2 m (6·6) in the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group using last observation carried forward (between-group difference 13·6 m [95% CI −2·8 to 29·9]). 118 (96%) of 123 patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event during the study; the incidence was similar between the cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat group (n=81 [95%]) and the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group (n=37 [97%]). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were fall (25 [29%] patients in the cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat group vs 15 [39%] in the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group), headache (20 [24%] vs 9 [24%]), nasopharyngitis (19 [22%] vs 3 [8%]), myalgia (14 [16%] vs 5 [13%]), and arthralgia (13 [15%]) vs 5 [13%]). 12 serious adverse events occurred in eight patients in the cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat group; only one event (anaphylaxis) was deemed related to study drug. One serious adverse event (stroke) occurred in the alglucosidase alfa plus placebo group, which was deemed unrelated to study drug. There were no deaths. Interpretation Cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat did not achieve statistical superiority to alglucosidase alfa plus placebo for improving 6-min walk distance in our overall population of patients with late-onset Pompe disease. Further studies should investigate the longer-term safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat and whether this investigational two-component therapy might provide benefits, particularly in respiratory function and in patients who have been receiving enzyme replacement therapy for more than 2 years, as suggested by our secondary and subgroup analyses. Funding Amicus Therapeutics.

Objective As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use grows, training in graduate medical education (GME) is increasingly needed. We piloted a multispecialty GME POCUS curriculum and assessed feasibility, knowledge, and comfort with performing POCUS exams. Methods Residents were selected from the following residency programs: internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, and a combined internal medicine/pediatrics program. Didactics occurred through an online curriculum that consisted of five modules: physics and machine operation, cardiac, lung, soft tissue, and extended focused sonography in trauma applications. Residents completed a pre- and post-curriculum questionnaire, as well as knowledge assessments before and after each module. One-hour hands-on training sessions were held for each module. Differences between pre- and post-participation questionnaire responses were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum. Results Of the 24 residents selected, 21 (86%) were post-graduate year two or three, and 16 (65%) were from the internal medicine program. Eighteen (67%) residents reported limited prior POCUS experience. All pre- to post-knowledge assessment scores increased (p0.05). Statistically significant increases pre- to post-curriculum were found for frequency of POCUS use (p = 0.003), comfort in using POCUS for assessing for abdominal aortic aneurysm, soft tissue abscess detection, undifferentiated hypotension and dyspnea, cardiac arrest and heart failure (p0.025); and competency in machine use, acquiring and interpreting images and incorporating POCUS into clinical practice (p0.001). All participants felt the skills learned during this curriculum were essential to their future practice. Conclusions In this pilot, we found using a combination of online and hands-on training to be feasible, with improvement in residents' knowledge, comfort, and use of POCUS.

Interest in an oncology career has decreased among internal medicine residents completing an inpatient hematology-oncology rotation. Over years, our institutional data at Indiana University School of Medicine reflected lower satisfaction with the oncology inpatient ward rotation as compared to other rotations. We hypothesized that a switch from an inpatient ward rotation to a hybrid model of inpatient consultations and outpatient clinics would improve resident satisfaction with their educational experience in oncology. Over the 6-month periods preceding and following the change in rotation format, residents were asked to complete anonymous rotation evaluations and rate their experiences on a 5-point Likert scale (poor 1 to excellent 5). Areas assessed included patient load, educational value of patient mix, quality of didactics and teaching, quality of patient care delivery, adequacy of time for reading, and overall rotation quality. The hybrid oncology rotation was rated as significantly superior to the traditional ward format in six out of eight areas including patient load, educational value of patient mix, time for study, teaching quality, relevance of material, and overall rating. Improvements in the perceived quality of patient care delivery (p = 0.139) and quality of didactics (p = 0.058) were also observed without reaching statistical significance. The balance of inpatient and outpatient experiences with the hybrid rotation was highly rated (4.5 ± 0.5). The implementation of a hybrid oncology rotation was associated with perceived improvement in educational value, patient mix, and time for reflection and study without apparent compromise in the quality of patient care delivery.

This chapter talks about Histoplasma capsulatum, which is a thermally dimorphic fungus found most frequently in soil in the midwestern United States (US), Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and Australia. It mentions bird and bat excreta that are rich in organic nitrogen that support the growth of Histoplasma capsulatum. It looks at recent outbreaks of histoplasmosis that have occurred after cleaning a campsite contaminated by bat excreta, rototilling soil in a schoolyard below a bird roost, whitewater rafting, and digging for buried treasure. The chapter explains how individuals infected with H. capsulatum develop adequate cell-mediated immunity (CMI). It analyzes histoplasmosis-associated hospitalizations of patients with transplants, diabetes, and autoimmune conditions requiring biologic therapies that have increased in the US for the last decades.

Background Benralizumab is a unique eosinophil-depleting monoclonal antibody that significantly reduces asthma exacerbations, improves lung function and asthma symptoms, and permits the reduction of maintenance oral corticosteroid dosage for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. Objective To assess benralizumab's onset of action and efficacy by examining change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) after initiation of treatment in the phase 3 clinical trials SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA. Methods Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis was used to calculate PEF using daily least squares mean changes from baseline in morning PEF as well as differences between the benralizumab every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks) and placebo groups. A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects approach with an exponential relationship was used to model trial data to determine time to clinically meaningful improvement in morning PEF (defined as ≥25 L/min). Results Least squares mean morning PEF improvement from baseline was numerically greater by Day 2 after initiation of benralizumab therapy in all 3 trials. The Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model indicated that PEF improvement reached the clinically meaningful threshold within 3 weeks in SIROCCO and CALIMA and 2 weeks in ZONDA. Conclusion In 3 phase 3 randomized clinical trials, benralizumab provided notable improvement in morning PEF 2 days after initiation and clinically meaningful improvements within 3 weeks for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. The rapid improvement in PEF demonstrated in these trials suggests that benralizumab's unique mechanism of action rapidly improves lung function for patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01928771 (SIROCCO), NCT01914757 (CALIMA), and NCT02075255 (ZONDA).

We evaluated the relationship between benralizumab (30 mg every 4 and 8 weeks (Q4W, Q8W)) pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and end points of asthma exacerbation rates (AERs) and change from baseline in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1) for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma in the SIROCCO/CALIMA phase III trials. In empirical assessment, AER ratios in SIROCCO were similar across PK quartiles. However, the lowest PK quartile in CALIMA had reduced efficacy; low CALIMA placebo AER possibly confounded this result. In population modeling, estimated benralizumab 90% effective concentration for AER reduction was 927 ng/mL, below the Q8W dosage steady‐state average PK concentration (1,066 ng/mL). Benralizumab treatment resulted in more rapid FEV 1 improvement vs. placebo (estimated half‐maximum time: 7.6 vs. 18 days); this response was greater for patients with greater baseline eosinophil counts. These results confirmed 30 mg Q8W is the optimal benralizumab dosage for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Interest in an oncology career has decreased among internal medicine residents completing an inpatient hematology-oncology rotation. Over years, our institutional data at Indiana University School of Medicine reflected lower satisfaction with the oncology inpatient ward rotation as compared to other rotations. We hypothesized that a switch from an inpatient ward rotation to a hybrid model of inpatient consultations and outpatient clinics would improve resident satisfaction with their educational experience in oncology. Over the 6-month periods preceding and following the change in rotation format, residents were asked to complete anonymous rotation evaluations and rate their experiences on a 5-point Likert scale (poor 1 to excellent 5). Areas assessed included patient load, educational value of patient mix, quality of didactics and teaching, quality of patient care delivery, adequacy of time for reading, and overall rotation quality. The hybrid oncology rotation was rated as significantly superior to the traditional ward format in six out of eight areas including patient load, educational value of patient mix, time for study, teaching quality, relevance of material, and overall rating. Improvements in the perceived quality of patient care delivery (p = 0.139) and quality of didactics (p = 0.058) were also observed without reaching statistical significance. The balance of inpatient and outpatient experiences with the hybrid rotation was highly rated (4.5 ± 0.5). The implementation of a hybrid oncology rotation was associated with perceived improvement in educational value, patient mix, and time for reflection and study without apparent compromise in the quality of patient care delivery.

BackgroundGreater precision in asthma exacerbation risk prediction may improve outcomes. We sought to identify clinical characteristics and biomarkers associated with elevated exacerbation risk in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.MethodsData were pooled from seven similarly designed phase II and III randomised controlled clinical trials of biologic therapies for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma that enrolled comparable patient populations. Annualised asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) for patients randomised to placebo were assessed by baseline clinical characteristics, and by biomarker concentrations at baseline and over the study duration.ResultsThe AAER for the 2016 patients in the combined placebo group was 0.91 (95% CI 0.84‒0.98). Baseline characteristics associated with greater AAER were frequent or severe exacerbations within the prior 12 months, nasal polyposis, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, Asian race and Asian or Western European region. AAER increased with baseline blood eosinophil counts and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FENO) concentration, with the greatest AAER occurring for patients with eosinophils ≥300 cells·μL−1 and FENO ≥50 ppb. No relationship was observed between baseline serum IgE concentration and AAER. Combining type 2 inflammation criteria for eosinophils and FENO had greater prognostic value than either biomarker alone. Persistent eosinophil and FENO elevations throughout the study period were associated with greater AAER.ConclusionsExacerbation history, maintenance corticosteroid use, nasal polyposis, Asian race, geographic region, and elevations in blood eosinophil counts and FENO concentrations (particularly when combined and/or persistently achieving type 2 inflammation criteria) were associated with increased exacerbation risk in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

Pamela L Zeitlin,1 Mila Leong,2 Jeremy Cole,3 Raburn M Mallory,4 Vivian H Shih,5 Richard F Olsson,6 Mitchell Goldman5 On behalf of the ALIZE study investigators 1Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA; 2Pediatric Pulmonary and Asthma Associates, Northfield, NJ, USA; 3OK Clinical Research, LLC, Edmond, OK, USA; 4MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 5AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 6AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden Background and objectives: Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated monoclonal antibody against the IL-5Rα. Initial monthly followed by every-other-month injections result in rapid and nearly complete eosinophil depletion. We evaluated whether three doses of benralizumab modifies antibody response to seasonal influenza vaccination for adolescent/young adult patients with moderate to severe asthma.Methods: ALIZE (NCT02814643) was a Phase IIIb randomized controlled trial of patients aged 12–21 years receiving medium- to high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists. Patients received benralizumab 30 mg or placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 8, plus tetravalent influenza vaccination at Week 8. At Week 12, strain-specific antibody responses following vaccination were assessed for four influenza antigens by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and microneutralization (MN) assays.Results: A total of 103 patients were randomized and received benralizumab (n=51) or placebo (n=52). There were no consistent differences in HAI or MN antibody responses at Week 12 between patients receiving benralizumab or placebo. HAI geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) for all influenza strains tested were 3.3–4.2 for benralizumab vs 3.4–3.9 for placebo; MN GMFRs were 2.8–5.1 for benralizumab vs 3.2–4.4 for placebo. A ≥4-fold rise in HAI from Weeks 8 to 12 occurred in 44.0%–56.0% and 30.6%–49.0% of patients receiving benralizumab and placebo, respectively. At Week 12, 78.0%–100% vs 79.6%–100% of patients receiving benralizumab and placebo, respectively, achieved a ≥40 HAI antibody titer. There were no significant safety findings.Conclusion: Benralizumab did not impair the antibody response to seasonal virus vaccination in adolescents and young adult patients with moderate to severe asthma. Keywords: benralizumab, interleukin-5, interleukin-5 receptor, influenza vaccination, eosinophils, antibody response, asthma

Background Adults and adolescents with severe asthma who completed the 48-week SIROCCO and 56-week CALIMA phase III benralizumab trials entered the safety extension study BORA (NCT02258542). The continued safety and efficacy of benralizumab in the first year of BORA (year 2 of treatment) have been reported. Objective We sought to report outcomes for adolescents during years 2 and 3 of treatment in BORA. Methods Patients on benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W) in SIROCCO/CALIMA continued their regimens in BORA (Q4W/Q4W and Q8W/Q8W, respectively), whereas placebo patients were rerandomized 1:1 to benralizumab (placebo/Q4W and placebo/Q8W, respectively) for 108 weeks. The primary outcome was safety; secondary outcomes included reduction in annual asthma exacerbation rate and change from baseline in prebronchodilator FEV1. Results Adolescents (N = 86) were treated with benralizumab Q8W (n = 61) or Q4W (n = 25); 69 completed treatment (Q8W: n = 51; Q4W: n = 18). For Q4W and Q8W regimens, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 68% (17 of 25) and 74% (45 of 61), respectively, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 68% (17/25) and 74% (45/61), TEAEs leading to discontinuation were 4% (1/25) and 0%, serious AEs were 8% (2/25) and 7% (4/61), and no deaths occurred. In efficacy analyses, 69% (42 of 61) Q8W patients were exacerbation-free (placebo/Q8W: 62% [18 of 29], Q8W/Q8W: 75% [24 of 32]). Mean ± SD change in FEV1 at week 108 versus BORA baseline was 0.327 ± 0.452 L (placebo/Q8W) and 0.323 ± 0.558 L (Q8W/Q8W). Conclusions Safety and efficacy profiles in this 2-year extension study (up to 3 years of benralizumab treatment in adolescents) were consistent with previous findings.

Key Clinical Message Disseminated histoplasmosis among immunocompetent patients is rare, but may be associated with clinically significant refractory thrombocytopenia. Platelet counts often return to normal levels following antifungal therapy. Therefore, the most important management of this refractory thrombocytopenia is the recognition and treatment of histoplasmosis infection.

Many patients with severe asthma rely on oral glucocorticoids to manage their disease. We investigated whether benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha subunit of the interleukin-5 receptor that significantly reduces the incidence of asthma exacerbations, was also effective as an oral glucocorticoid-sparing therapy in patients relying on oral glucocorticoids to manage severe asthma associated with eosinophilia.In a 28-week randomized, controlled trial, we assessed the effects of benralizumab (at a dose of 30 mg administered subcutaneously either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks [with the first three doses administered every 4 weeks]) versus placebo on the reduction in the oral glucocorticoid dose while asthma control was maintained in adult patients with severe asthma. The primary end point was the percentage change in the oral glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 28. Annual asthma exacerbation rates, lung function, symptoms, and safety were assessed.Of 369 patients enrolled, 220 underwent randomization and started receiving benralizumab or placebo. The two benralizumab dosing regimens significantly reduced the median final oral glucocorticoid doses from baseline by 75%, as compared with a reduction of 25% in the oral glucocorticoid doses in the placebo group (P0.001 for both comparisons). The odds of a reduction in the oral glucocorticoid dose were more than 4 times as high with benralizumab as with placebo. Among the secondary outcomes, benralizumab administered every 4 weeks resulted in an annual exacerbation rate that was 55% lower than the rate with placebo (marginal rate, 0.83 vs. 1.83, P=0.003), and benralizumab administered every 8 weeks resulted in an annual exacerbation rate that was 70% lower than the rate with placebo (marginal rate, 0.54 vs. 1.83, P0.001). At 28 weeks, there was no significant effect of either benralizumab regimen on the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEVBenralizumab showed significant, clinically relevant benefits, as compared with placebo, on oral glucocorticoid use and exacerbation rates. These effects occurred without a sustained effect on the FEV

Background: Severe asthma is heterogeneous, with different phenotypes and endotypes. Aims and Objectives: We identified subsets of benralizumab-treated patients (pts) with severe asthma by assignment to Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) clinical clusters. Methods: Pts (N=2,281) from SIROCCO (Lancet 2016:2115; n=1,082) and CALIMA (Lancet 2016:2128; n=1,199) were assigned to clusters via a discriminant function based on 11 predictors. Drug responses were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test (nominal p-values). Results: Pts met criteria for 4 of 5 SARP clusters. Cluster 2 pts (n=393) were 81% atopic with early onset moderate asthma (mean age 15 yrs). Cluster 4 pts (n=386) were 82% atopic with early onset severe asthma (mean age 11 yrs). Cluster 3 pts (n=641) were 50% atopic with late-onset severe asthma (mean age 47 yrs). Cluster 5 pts (n=861) were 55% atopic with late-onset asthma (mean age 33 yrs) and persistent airflow obstruction. All clusters had annual exacerbation rate reductions for combined benralizumab arms vs. placebo, which were greater in late-onset asthma clusters (Cluster 3, −48%; 5, −50%; p Conclusions: Benralizumab improved lung function and reduced exacerbations in all clusters, with greater effects in late-onset asthma Clusters 3 and 5 vs. early onset Clusters 2 and 4. This supports the importance of understanding asthma heterogeneity and responsiveness to targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a group of diseases defined by marked eosinophilia in blood or tissue and eosinophil-related clinical manifestations. Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor α, which is expressed on human eosinophils. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, we administered a series of three monthly subcutaneous injections of either benralizumab (at a dose of 30 mg) or placebo in 20 symptomatic patients who had PDGFRA-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome and an absolute eosinophil count of at least 1000 cells per cubic millimeter; all the patients were receiving stable therapy (drugs or dietary changes) for this disease. This regimen was followed by an open-label phase, during which the patient’s background therapy could be tapered as tolerated, and an extension phase. The primary end point of the randomized phase was a reduction of at least 50% in the absolute eosinophil count at week 12. RESULTS: During the randomized phase, the primary end point occurred in more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group (9 of 10 patients [90%] vs. 3 of 10 patients [30%], P = 0.02). During the open-label phase, clinical and hematologic responses were observed in 17 of 19 patients (89%) and were sustained for 48 weeks in 14 of 19 patients (74%); in the latter group, in 9 of 14 patients (64%), background therapies could be tapered. Bone marrow and tissue eosinophilia were also suppressed with benralizumab therapy. The most common drug-related adverse events, headache and an elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, occurred in 32% of the patients after the first dose of benralizumab and resolved within 48 hours in all patients. Other adverse events occurred with similar frequency in the two groups. Of the many potential predictors of response that were examined, only clinical disease subtype appeared to be associated with the initial response or relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In this small phase 2 trial, patients with PDGFRA-negative hypereosinophilic syndrome who received benralizumab for 12 weeks had lower absolute eosinophil counts than those who received placebo. During the open-label phase, clinical and hematologic responses were sustained for 48 weeks in 74% of the patients. Adverse events did not limit treatment. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00001406 and NCT02130882.)

AIDS Clinical Trial Group study A5202 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00118898","term_id":"NCT00118898"}}NCT00118898) was a phase 3b, randomized, partially blinded equivalence study of open-label atazanavir/ritonavir or efavirenz, plus either placebo-controlled tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine, in treatment-naive adults living with HIV-1, evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability. We report an analysis of the contribution of participant characteristics to the disposition of tenofovir plasma concentrations. Tenofovir concentration data from a total of 817 individuals (88% of the total number of eligible patients randomly assigned to receive treatment in the TDF-containing arms of A5202) were available for analysis. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. One- and two-compartment models with first-order absorption and first-order elimination were evaluated. An exponential error model was used for examination of interindividual variability (IIV), and a proportional and mixed-error model was assessed for residual variability. The final structural model contained two compartments with first-order absorption and elimination. IIV was estimated for apparent clearance (CL/F) and the first-order absorption rate constant (ka), and a proportional residual variability model was selected. The final mean parameter estimates were as follows: ka = 2.87 h−1, CL/F = 37.2 liters/h, apparent volumes of the central and peripheral compartments = 127 and 646 liters, respectively, and apparent intercompartmental clearance = 107 liters/h. In addition to race/ethnicity, creatinine clearance and assignment to atazanavir/ritonavir or efavirenz were significantly associated with CL/F (P < 0.001). In conclusion, race/ethnicity is associated with tenofovir oral CL in HIV-1 positive, treatment-naive adults. This covariate relationship raises questions about the possibility of differences in efficacy and risk of adverse events in different patient populations and suggests that examining preexposure prophylaxis regimens and tenofovir exposure in different race/ethnicity groups be considered.

Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 receptor α-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody that has been shown to safely reduce exacerbations and improve lung function for patients with asthma. We assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.We conducted a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 extension study at 447 sites in 24 countries. Eligible patients had to have completed the SIROCCO or CALIMA trials and remained on subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W). Patients who had received placebo in those trials were re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio, using an interactive web-based system, to benralizumab 30 mg either Q4W or Q8W (first three doses 4 weeks apart). Treatment lasted for 56 weeks for adult patients (age ≥18 years) and 108 weeks for adolescent patients (age 12-17 years). The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the two dosing regimens of benralizumab up to 68 weeks for adult patients (including the follow-up visit post-treatment) and up to 56 weeks for adolescent patients. This endpoint was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA predecessor studies who received at least one dose of study treatment in BORA and did not continue into another trial. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02258542).Between Nov 19, 2014, and July 6, 2016, we enrolled 1926 patients, of whom 633 had received benralizumab Q4W and 639 had received benralizumab Q8W in SIROCCO or CALIMA. The remaining 654 patients had received placebo in those trials and were randomly re-assigned in this trial to receive benralizumab Q4W (n=320) or Q8W (n=334). 1576 patients, including 783 who received benralizumab Q4W (265 newly assigned) and 793 who received benralizumab Q8W (281 newly assigned), were included in the full analysis set. The most common adverse events in all groups were viral upper respiratory tract infection (14-16%) and worsening asthma (7-10%). The most common serious adverse events were worsening asthma (3-4%), pneumonia (1% to 1%), and pneumonia caused by bacterial infection (0-1%). The percentages of patients who had any on-treatment adverse event, any serious adverse event, or any adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation during BORA were similar between patients originally assigned benralizumab and those originally assigned placebo and between benralizumab treatment regimens. The percentage of patients who had any adverse event was similar between SIROCCO or CALIMA (71-75%; benralizumab group only) and BORA (65-71%), as was the percentage of patients who had an adverse event that led to treatment discontinuation (2% in SIROCCO and CALIMA vs 2-3% in BORA).The 2 years of safety results validate that observations observed in the first year of benralizumab continued through a second year of treatment. No new consequences of long-term eosinophil depletion occurred, and the incidence of other adverse events, including opportunistic infections, were similar during the second year.AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin.

Summary Background Benralizumab is a humanised, afucosylated, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that induces direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (CALIMA) undertaken at 303 sites in 11 countries, we enrolled patients aged 12–75 years with severe asthma uncontrolled by medium-dosage to high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β₂-agonists (ICS plus LABA) and a history of two or more exacerbations in the previous year. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 56 weeks of benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W; first three doses 4 weeks apart), or placebo (all subcutaneous injection). Patients were stratified (2:1) by baseline blood eosinophil counts 300 cells per μL or greater and less than 300 cells per μL, respectively. Patients and study centre staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate ratio versus placebo for patients receiving high-dosage ICS plus LABA with baseline blood eosinophils 300 cells per μL or greater (intention-to-treat analysis). Key secondary endpoints were pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) and total asthma symptom score. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01914757. Findings Between Aug 21, 2013, and March 16, 2015, 2505 patients were enrolled, of whom 1306 patients were randomised; 425 patients were randomly assigned to and received benralizumab 30 mg Q4W, 441 to benralizumab 30 mg Q8W, and 440 to placebo. 728 patients were included in the primary analysis population. Benralizumab resulted in significantly lower annual exacerbation rates with the Q4W regimen (rate 0·60 [95% CI 0·48–0·74], rate ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·49–0·85], p=0·0018, n=241) and Q8W regimen (rate 0·66 [95% CI 0·54–0·82], rate ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·54–0·95], p=0·0188, n=239) compared with placebo (rate 0·93 [95% CI 0·77–1·12], n=248). Benralizumab also significantly improved pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 (Q4W and Q8W) and total asthma symptom score (Q8W only) in these patients. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (90 [21%] in the Q4W group, 79 [18%] in the Q8W group, and 92 [21%] in the placebo group) and worsening asthma (61 [14%] in the Q4W group, 47 [11%] in the Q8W group, and 68 [15%] in the group). Interpretation Benralizumab significantly reduced annual exacerbation rates and was generally well tolerated for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with blood eosinophils 300 cells per μL or greater. Our data further refine the patient population likely to receive the greatest benefit from benralizumab treatment. Funding AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin.

Background Atopic, eosinophilic, and T H 2-high asthma phenotypes may overlap, but the extent is unknown. Understanding the overlap across these phenotypes may be useful in guiding asthma patient care. Objective To examine the frequency and overlap of atopic, eosinophilic, and T H 2-high asthma phenotypes. Methods We analyzed 2005 to 2006 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Patients with asthma were identified based on the participant self-report. Eosinophilic asthma was defined as a blood eosinophil cutoff point of ≥150, 300, or 400/μL. Atopic asthma was defined as having an allergen-specific IgE level of ≥0.35 IU/mL for any of the 9 perennial allergens tested. T H 2-high asthma was defined as a total serum IgE of ≥100 IU/mL and a blood eosinophil count of ≥140/μL. Results The study included 269 children and 310 adults. Depending on the eosinophil cutoff used, 31% to 78% of children and 21% to 69% of adults with asthma were classified as having eosinophilic asthma. In addition, 63% of children and 61% of adults were classified as having atopic disease and 48% of children and 37% of adults as having T H 2-high asthma. At a higher eosinophil cutoff point, a greater proportion of eosinophilic asthma can be classified as atopic or T H 2 high, but a lower proportion of atopic or T H 2-high asthma can be classified as eosinophilic. Approximately 70% or more of children and adults with asthma were 1 of these 3 phenotypes. Conclusion A considerable overlap among eosinophilic, atopic, and T H 2-high asthma phenotypes exists in a general asthma population.

11006 Background: Interest in pursuing a career in oncology has decreased among internal medicine residents completing an inpatient oncology rotation. Over several years, our institutional data at Indiana University School of Medicine reflected lower resident satisfaction with the oncology inpatient ward rotation compared to other rotations. Methods: A hybrid model of inpatient consultations and outpatient clinics replaced the traditional inpatient oncology rotation at our institution. Over a six-month period preceding and following the change in format, residents completed anonymous rotation assessments and rated their experiences on a 5-point Likert scale (low 1 to high 5). Areas assessed included: patient load, educational value of patient mix, quality of didactics and teaching, quality of patient care delivery, adequacy of time for reading, and overall educational quality of the rotation. Results: The hybrid oncology rotation (8 respondents out of 10 residents approached) was rated as significantly superior to the traditional ward format (15 respondents out of 16 residents approached) in six out of eight areas. Improvements in the perceived quality of patient care delivery (p=0.139) and quality of didactics (p=0.058) were also observed without reaching statistical significance. The balance of inpatient and outpatient experiences with the hybrid rotation was highly rated (4.5 ± 0.5). Conclusions: The implementation of a hybrid oncology rotation was associated with perceived improvement in educational value, patient mix, and time for reflection and study without apparent compromise in the quality of patient care delivery. [Table: see text]

Gary T Ferguson,1 Adel H Mansur,2 Joshua S Jacobs,3 Jacques Hebert,4 Corbin Clawson,5 Wenli Tao,6 Yanping Wu,6 Mitchell Goldman6 On behalf of the GREGALE study investigators 1Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA; 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; 3Allergy & Asthma Clinical Research, Walnut Creek, CA, USA; 4Clinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capitale, Allergie et Immunologie, CHU de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada; 5MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 6AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA Background: Patients prefer at-home subcutaneous administration of biologics across different diseases, yet no biologic is approved for at-home use for severe, uncontrolled asthma. Objective: We assessed at-home functionality, reliability, and performance of an accessorized pre-filled syringe (APFS) for subcutaneous benralizumab administration, an anti-eosinophil monoclonal antibody indicated for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Materials and methods: Patients (N=116) with severe, uncontrolled asthma despite receiving medium- or high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists received up to 5 APFS-administered subcutaneous doses (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16) of benralizumab 30 mg. The first 3 doses were administered at the study sites. The patient/caregiver administered the last 2 doses at home. Endpoints included the percentage of dispensed APFS that were used successfully blood eosinophil counts, Asthma Control Questionnaire 6, and safety. Results: Nearly all dispensed APFS were successfully used in the clinic and at home (Week 0: 116/116, 100%; Week 4: 116/117, 99%; Week 8: 115/115, 100%; Week 12: 112/114, 98%; Week 16: 108/109, 99%). Only 1 APFS malfunctioned out of 573 dispensed. Two at-home administrations were unsuccessful because of patient-use error. One unreturned APFS was recorded as nonfunctional. Mean Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 scores decreased from baseline through all post-baseline time points, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils was observed at the end of treatment. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and sinusitis. Five patients (4%) experienced transient mild or moderate injection-site reactions. Conclusion: The APFS was functional, reliable, and performed equally well in the clinic and at home. Keywords: biologic, subcutaneous, eosinophil, asthma, treatment, patient preference

Background Our current system for evaluation relies on faculty and peer evaluation of intern performance relating to general ACGME milestones. However, a program may have insufficient data to accurately identify a struggling intern until several months into the academic year. Objective To develop a brief, objective, resident-based evaluation tool to facilitate earlier identification of struggling interns in pediatric and internal medicine programs. Methods The intern check-in tool (ICT) consists of 18 items with a variety of observable key skills expected for interns (refer to attached form). It is scored on a 22-point scale of objective behaviors. Chief residents meet half way through each rotation and review the tool with senior residents supervising each intern. Results We implemented the use of the ICT at the beginning of the academic year in July 2018. Mid-year data are still being analyzed. In January 2019, after completion of the clinical competency committee (CCC) meetings, we will perform statistical analysis to measure correlations between the ICT scores and the overall intern performance as assessed by the CCC. We will also calculate the sensitivity and specificity for a range of ICT scores and measure correlations between the ICT scores and the demographic data, including medical school quartile and USMLE scores, for each intern. The ICT allowed us to identify a struggling intern early on who had multiple high scores. Following focused feedback and mentoring from senior residents, the intern's performance improved significantly prior to the CCC. The use of the tool has also identified interns struggling with wellness, who we have been able to integrate into a counseling program. Conclusions The pilot of the ICT may supplement more general milestone evaluations. Our data are preliminary but promising. This tool might be of benefit to other programs aiming to assess intern performance. It provides a forum for residents to learn the art of giving feedback and seek strategies to help their interns improve in real time.

Introduction and Objectives Benralizumab, a humanised anti-eosinophil monoclonal antibody, is in development as an add-on treatment for severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma. During Phase III trials, benralizumab significantly reduced annual asthma exacerbation rates and was well-tolerated.1,2 The GREGALE study (NCT02417961) assessed patient and caregiver-reported functionality, performance, and reliability of an accessorised pre-filled syringe (APFS) used to administer benralizumab subcutaneously in an at-home setting. Methods Patients (n=116) with severe, uncontrolled asthma despite receiving medium- or high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists, received up to five APFS-administered subcutaneous doses (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16) of 30 mg benralizumab. The first three doses were administered at the study sites. The patient/caregiver administered the last two doses at home. Endpoints included the percentage of patients/caregivers who successfully administered benralizumab at home, percentage of APFS returned to study sites and evaluated as functional, percentage of APFS returned as malfunctioning to Product Complaints, efficacy (Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 [ACQ-6]), safety, and pharmacodynamics (blood eosinophil count). Results Nearly all patients and caregivers successfully administered benralizumab with an APFS at home (Week 12: 112/114, 98%; Week 16: 108/109, 99%; figure 1). Two at-home administrations were unsuccessful because of patient-use error. One APFS was recorded as nonfunctional because it was not returned for evaluation. Product Complaints identified only 1 APFS malfunction of 573 dispensed. Mean ACQ-6 scores decreased from baseline through all postbaseline time points through end of treatment (baseline: mean 2.14 [standard deviation {SD} 0.81]; Week 20: mean 1.40 [SD 0.90]). Near-complete depletion of eosinophils was observed at end of treatment vs. baseline (baseline: median 250 cells/µL [interquartile range {IQR} 175–430 cells/µL]; and Week 20: median 0 cells/µL [IQR 0–10 cells/µL]). Incidence of adverse events leading to benralizumab discontinuation was 2.6%. Most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and sinusitis. Five patients (4.3%) experienced transient mild or moderate injection-site reactions. Conclusions Most patients and caregivers successfully administered benralizumab in an at-home setting. The APFS was functional, reliable, and performed well. Please refer to page A258 for declarations of interest in relation to abstract P69. References Bleecker ERet al. Lancet2016;388:2115–27. FitzGerald JMet al. Lancet2016;388:2128–41.

Introduction: In Phase III studies, benralizumab, a humanized anti–interleukin-5 receptor α, anti-eosinophil (EOS) monoclonal antibody, significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and improved asthma control for patients (pts) with severe, uncontrolled asthma. Aims and Objectives: We evaluated the effect of baseline blood EOS counts and exacerbation history on benralizumab response. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from SIROCCO (Lancet. 2016;388:2115–27; 48 weeks [N=1,204]) and CALIMA (Lancet. 2016;388:2128–41; 56 weeks [N=1,091]) of pts with severe, uncontrolled asthma receiving benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), every 8 weeks (Q8W, Q4W for the first 3 doses), or placebo. Pts had ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER) by baseline blood EOS count and exacerbation history. Results: AER decreased with benralizumab vs. placebo at every EOS threshold, with a response/EOS threshold relationship for Q8W dosing (table). More exacerbations in the past year were associated with a greater response to benralizumab. Similar trends emerged for lung function and asthma symptom improvements. Conclusions: For pts with severe, uncontrolled asthma, greater baseline blood EOS counts and more frequent exacerbations were associated with greater treatment effects. These results should help refine patient selection for benralizumab treatment.

Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that has been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We further explored the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds and exacerbation histories.This study is a pooled analysis of the results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase 3 studies. In these studies, patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg, either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (with first three doses given every 4 weeks), or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER) ratio versus placebo, analysed by baseline eosinophil counts (≥0, ≥150, ≥300, or ≥450 cells per μL) and by number of exacerbations (two vs three or more) during the year before enrolment. The analyses were done in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle.Of 2295 patients, 756 received benralizumab every 4 weeks, 762 received benralizumab every 8 weeks, and 777 patients received placebo. AER among patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 0 cells per μL was 1·16 (95% CI 1·05-1·28) in patients who received placebo versus 0·75 (0·66-0·84) in patients who received benralizumab every 8 weeks (rate ratio 0·64, 0·55-0·75; p0·0001). In patients who received benralizumab every 4 weeks who had eosinophil counts of 0 or more cells per μL, AER was 0·73 (0·65-0·82); rate ratio versus placebo was 0·63 (0·54-0·74; p0·0001). The extent to which exacerbation rates were reduced increased with increasing blood eosinophil thresholds and with greater exacerbation history in patients in the 4-weekly and 8-weekly benralizumab groups. Greater improvements in AER were seen with benralizumab compared with placebo for patients with a combination of high blood eosinophil thresholds and a history of more frequent exacerbations.These results will help to guide clinicians when they are deciding whether to use benralizumab to treat patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma.AstraZeneca.

Objective: Benralizumab, an anti-eosinophilic monoclonal antibody, in combination with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABA), significantly reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function, and reduced symptoms for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL in the Phase III SIROCCO and CALIMA studies. To understand the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with eosinophil-driven disease with blood eosinophil counts lower than 300 cells/μL, we evaluated the effect of applying an eosinophil cutoff of ≥150 cells/μL.Methods: Adult patients with uncontrolled asthma despite high-dosage ICS/LABA ± additional asthma controller(s) received subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W; first three doses every 4 weeks) or placebo for 48 (SIROCCO) or 56 (CALIMA) weeks. Efficacy measures including annual exacerbation rate, prebronchodilator FEV1, and total asthma symptom score were analyzed by baseline blood eos...

With Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies [(1)][1], there was a shift from time- to competency-based training. Milestones for internal medicine (IM) residents and cardiovascular medicine (CVM) fellows have created an opportunity to rethink progression through

Dolutegravir (DTG), a next-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI), was recently approved for use in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. In treatment-naive trial participants, DTG given at 50 mg once daily without pharmacologic boosting combined with a standard nucleoside backbone was shown to be noninferior or superior to first-line regimens containing efavirenz, darunavir/ritonavir, or raltegravir regardless of pretreatment viral load. This drug also exhibited efficacy in antiretroviral therapy-experienced participants and has proven to retain activity when dosed twice daily in some participants harboring resistance to the other INSTIs, raltegravir and elvitegravir. DTG has few drug interactions and is taken without regard to meals. It causes benign elevations in serum creatinine based on its inhibition of tubular creatinine secretion without affecting the glomerular filtration rate. Overall, DTG is well tolerated, with headache and insomnia being the most frequently reported adverse events.

Background Although respiratory symptoms are characteristic features of COPD, there is no standardised method for quantifying their severity in stable disease. Objective To evaluate the EXACT-Respiratory Symptom (E-RS) measure, a daily diary comprising 11 of the 14 items in the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT). Methods Qualitative: patient focus group and interviews to address content validity. Quantitative: secondary data analyses to test reliability and validity. Results Qualitative: n=84; mean (SD) age 65 (10) years, FEV1 1.2(0.4) L; 44% male. Subject descriptions of their respiratory symptoms were consistent with E-RS content and structure. Quantitative: n=188; mean (SD) age 66 (10) years, FEV1 1.2(0.5) L; 50% male. Factor analysis (FA) showed 3 subscales: RS-Breathlessness, RS-Cough & Sputum, and RS-Chest Symptoms; second-order FA supported a general factor and total score. Reliability (total and subscales): 0.88, 0.86, 0.73, 0.81; 2-day test-retest ICC: 0.90, 0.86, 0.87, 0.82, respectively. Validity: Total scores correlated significantly (p < 0.0001) with SGRQ Total (r=0.75), Symptoms (r=0.66), Activity (r=0.57), Impact (r=0.70) scores; subscale correlations were also significant (r=0.26, p

Summary Background Benralizumab is a humanised, anti-interleukin 5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that directly and rapidly depletes eosinophils, reduces asthma exacerbations, and improves lung function for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of benralizumab for patients with mild to moderate, persistent asthma. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18–75 years, weighing at least 40 kg, and with a postbronchodilator reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) of at least 12% at screening, from 52 clinical research centres in six countries. Patients must have been receiving either low- to medium-dosage inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or low-dosage ICS plus long-acting β 2 agonist fixed-combination therapy at screening, had a morning prebronchodilator FEV 1 of more than 50% to 90% predicted at screening, and had one or more of the following symptoms within the 7 days before randomisation: a daytime or night-time asthma symptom score of at least 1 for at least 2 days, rescue short-acting β 2 agonist use for at least 2 days, or night-time awakenings due to asthma for at least one night. We converted patients' ICS treatments to 180 μg or 200 μg budesonide dry powder inhaler twice daily for the entire duration of the study using the approved dosages in the patients' respective countries and randomly allocated them (1:1; stratified by blood eosinophil count [ vs ≥300 cells per μL] and region [USA vs the rest of the world]) with an interactive web-based voice response system to receive subcutaneous placebo or benralizumab 30 mg injections every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. All patients and investigators involved in patient treatment or clinical assessment and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was change from baseline prebronchodilator FEV 1 at week 12. Efficacy analyses used an intention to treat approach. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02322775. Findings Between Feb 2, 2015, and April 24, 2015, we enrolled 351 patients, with 211 (60%) randomly assigned (105 [50%] to placebo and 106 [50%] to benralizumab). Benralizumab resulted in an 80 mL (95% CI 0–150; p=0·04) greater improvement (least-squares mean difference) in prebronchodilator FEV 1 after 12 weeks than did placebo (placebo group: 2246 mL [SD 768] at baseline vs 2261 mL [796] at week 12, change from baseline of 0 mL; benralizumab group: 2248 mL [606] vs 2310 mL [670], 70 mL). 44 (42%) patients in the benralizumab group had adverse events compared with 49 (47%) in the placebo group. The most common adverse events for both groups were nasopharyngitis (eight [8%] patients in each group) and upper respiratory tract infections (five [5%] patients in each group). Serious adverse events occurred in two (2%) patients each in the benralizumab (pancytopenia and a suicide attempt, both considered unrelated to treatment) and placebo (cervix carcinoma and colon adenoma) groups. Interpretation This study suggests that active and modifiable disease processes might be ongoing in patients with mild to moderate, persistent asthma receiving ICS. Although the lung function improvement observed does not warrant use of benralizumab in this population because it did not reach the minimum clinically important difference of 10%, further studies to assess this finding should be considered. Funding AstraZeneca.

Introduction: Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-5 receptor alpha subunit and induces direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of systemic and bronchial eosinophils via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Aims and Objectives: The efficacy and safety of benralizumab for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma with (blood) eosinophilia were evaluated in the SIROCCO study (NCT01928771). Methods: In this randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial, 1,204 patients (pts) (ages 12–75 years) with severe asthma uncontrolled on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β 2 agonists were treated for 48 weeks with 30 mg SC benralizumab either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks), or PBO every 4 weeks. Pts were stratified 2:1 based on blood eosinophil counts of ≥300 and Results: For the primary analysis, pts receiving benralizumab achieved significantly greater decreases in the annual exacerbation rate vs. PBO (table), and lung function and asthma symptom improvement at Week 48. Adverse events were similar between the benralizumab-treated groups and PBO. Conclusions: Benralizumab significantly reduced annual exacerbation rates, improved lung function, and reduced asthma symptoms, in patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma.

Introduction : Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin-5 receptor alpha subunit and induces direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Aims and Objectives: CALIMA (NCT01914757) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients (pts) with severe, uncontrolled asthma. Methods : In this randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial, 1,306 pts (ages 12–75 years) with severe asthma receiving high- or medium-dosage inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β 2 agonists were treated for 56 weeks with 30 mg SC benralizumab either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (first 3 doses every 4 weeks), or PBO every 4 weeks. The primary analysis was for pts on high-dosage ICS with ≥300/μL baseline blood eosinophil counts. Results: Annual asthma exacerbation rates (primary endpoint) were reduced significantly, with improvements in lung function and asthma symptoms in pts receiving either regimen of benralizumab compared with PBO at Week 56 (table). Adverse events were similar between the benralizumab-treated groups and PBO. Conclusions: Benralizumab significantly reduced annual exacerbation rates, improved lung function, and reduced asthma symptoms, in patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma.

Introduction: Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-5 receptor alpha subunit that results in direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. It is being evaluated for treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma with eosinophilic inflammation. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the BISE study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients (pts) with mild to moderate, persistent asthma (NCT02322775). Methods: In this double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter study, 211 pts aged 18-75 years with pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) FEV1 >50%–≤90%, post-BD FEV1 reversibility ≥12%, and evidence of asthma symptoms within 7 days before randomization received benralizumab 30 mg or PBO subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 at Week 12. Results: At Week 12, pts receiving benralizumab demonstrated greater improvements in pre-BD FEV1 vs. pts receiving PBO (table). Fewer benralizumab-treated pts reported adverse events on treatment vs. PBO-treated pts (37/106 vs. 47/105). Conclusions: Benralizumab treatment significantly improved pre-BD FEV1 in pts with mild to moderate, persistent asthma, with tolerability comparable to PBO during the 12-week study.

Summary Background Eosinophilia is associated with worsening asthma severity and decreased lung function, with increased exacerbation frequency. We assessed the safety and efficacy of benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor α that depletes eosinophils by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with eosinophilia. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 study at 374 sites in 17 countries. We recruited patients (aged 12–75 years) with a physician-based diagnosis of asthma for at least 1 year and at least two exacerbations while on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β 2 -agonists (ICS plus LABA) in the previous year. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive web-based voice response system to benralizumab 30 mg either every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W; first three doses every 4 weeks) or placebo Q4W for 48 weeks as add on to their standard treatment. Patients were stratified 2:1 according to blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per μL and less than 300 cells per μL. All patients and investigators involved in patient treatment or clinical assessment were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate ratio versus placebo, and key secondary endpoints were prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) and total asthma symptom score at week 48, for patients with blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 cells per μL. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat (based on the full analysis set); safety analyses included patients according to study drug received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01928771. Findings Between Sept 19, 2013, and March 16, 2015, 2681 patients were enrolled, 1205 of whom met the study criteria and were randomly assigned: 407 to placebo, 400 to benralizumab 30 mg Q4W, and 398 to benralizumab 30 mg Q8W. 267 patients in the placebo group, 275 in the benralizumab 30 mg Q4W group, and 267 in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W group had blood eosinophil counts at least 300 cells per μL and were included in the primary analysis population. Compared with placebo, benralizumab reduced the annual asthma exacerbation rate over 48 weeks when given Q4W (rate ratio 0·55, 95% CI 0·42–0·71; p 1 in patients at week 48 compared with placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline: Q4W group 0·106 L, 95% CI 0·016–0·196; Q8W group 0·159 L, 0·068–0·249). Compared with placebo, asthma symptoms were improved by the Q8W regimen (least-squares mean difference −0·25, 95% CI −0·45 to −0·06), but not the Q4W regimen (−0·08, −0·27 to 0·12). The most common adverse events were worsening asthma (105 [13%] of 797 benralizumab-treated patients vs 78 [19%] of 407 placebo-treated patients) and nasopharyngitis (93 [12%] vs 47 [12%]). Interpretation These results confirm the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma and elevated eosinophils, which are uncontrolled by high-dosage ICS plus LABA, and provide support for benralizumab to be an additional option to treat this disease in this patient population. Funding AstraZeneca and Kyowa Hakko Kirin.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons are at higher risk for serious complications associated with traditional smallpox vaccines. Alternative smallpox vaccines with an improved safety profile would address this unmet medical need.The safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) was assessed in 91 HIV-infected adult subjects (CD4(+) T-cell counts, ≥350 cells/mm(3)) and 60 uninfected volunteers. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety of MVA and immunogenicity in HIV-infected and uninfected subjects. As a measure of the potential efficacy of MVA, the ability to boost the memory response in people previously vaccinated against smallpox was evaluated by the inclusion of vaccinia-experienced HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected subjects.MVA was well tolerated and immunogenic in all subjects. Antibody responses were comparable between uninfected and HIV-infected populations, with only 1 significantly lower total antibody titer at 2 weeks after the second vaccination, while no significant differences were observed for neutralizing antibodies. MVA rapidly boosted the antibody responses in vaccinia-experienced subjects, supporting the efficacy of MVA against variola.MVA is a promising candidate as a safer smallpox vaccine, even for immunocompromised individuals, a group for whom current smallpox vaccines have an unacceptable safety profile.