1. Patient-Centered Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Author
-
Marilyn M. Rymer, Elizabeth Gialde, Jeffrey L. Saver, David M. Kent, Er Chen, Eric M. Cheng, Debbie Summers, Emily Chhatriwalla, Brian Garavalia, Carole Decker, Miriam E. Quinlan, and John A. Spertus
- Subjects
Male ,Patients ,Health Personnel ,Population ,Risk Assessment ,Brain Ischemia ,Decision Support Techniques ,Fibrinolytic Agents ,Patient Education as Topic ,Patient-Centered Care ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Stroke ,education.field_of_study ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,business.industry ,Evidence-based medicine ,Emergency department ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Focus group ,Recombinant Proteins ,Caregivers ,Tissue Plasminogen Activator ,Acute Disease ,Female ,Medical emergency ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Risk assessment ,Fibrinolytic agent ,Qualitative research - Abstract
Background— National guidelines endorse recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) in eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke to improve patients’ functional recovery. However, 23% to 40% of ideal candidates with acute ischemic stroke for reperfusion are not treated, perhaps because of the difficulty in explaining the benefits and risks of r-tPA within the frenetic pace of emergency department care. To support better knowledge transfer and creation of a shared decision-making tool, we conducted qualitative interviews to define the information needs and preferred presentation format for stroke survivors, caregivers, and clinicians considering r-tPA treatment. Methods and Results— A multidisciplinary team used qualitative research methods to identify informational needs and strategies for describing the benefits and risks of r-tPA in a clinical setting. Through focus groups (n=10) of stroke survivors (n=39) and caregivers (n=24) and individual interviews with emergency physicians (n=23) and advanced practice nurses (n=20), several themes emerged. Survivors and caregivers preferred a broader definition of a good outcome (independence, rather than no significant disability), simpler graphs as compared with detailed pictographs, and presentation of both population and individualized benefits (framed positively) and risk of receiving r-tPA. Some physicians expressed skepticism with the data and the ability to present risk/benefit information emergently, whereas other physicians and most advanced practice nurses thought such information would improve care. Physicians stressed the importance of presenting the risk of thrombolytic-related intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions— This study suggests that a positively framed risk–benefit tool with graphical presentations of general and patient-specific risk estimates could support patients and providers in considering r-tPA for acute ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01864928.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF