Back to Search Start Over

Patient-Centered Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Authors :
Marilyn M. Rymer
Elizabeth Gialde
Jeffrey L. Saver
David M. Kent
Er Chen
Eric M. Cheng
Debbie Summers
Emily Chhatriwalla
Brian Garavalia
Carole Decker
Miriam E. Quinlan
John A. Spertus
Source :
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 8
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2015.

Abstract

Background— National guidelines endorse recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) in eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke to improve patients’ functional recovery. However, 23% to 40% of ideal candidates with acute ischemic stroke for reperfusion are not treated, perhaps because of the difficulty in explaining the benefits and risks of r-tPA within the frenetic pace of emergency department care. To support better knowledge transfer and creation of a shared decision-making tool, we conducted qualitative interviews to define the information needs and preferred presentation format for stroke survivors, caregivers, and clinicians considering r-tPA treatment. Methods and Results— A multidisciplinary team used qualitative research methods to identify informational needs and strategies for describing the benefits and risks of r-tPA in a clinical setting. Through focus groups (n=10) of stroke survivors (n=39) and caregivers (n=24) and individual interviews with emergency physicians (n=23) and advanced practice nurses (n=20), several themes emerged. Survivors and caregivers preferred a broader definition of a good outcome (independence, rather than no significant disability), simpler graphs as compared with detailed pictographs, and presentation of both population and individualized benefits (framed positively) and risk of receiving r-tPA. Some physicians expressed skepticism with the data and the ability to present risk/benefit information emergently, whereas other physicians and most advanced practice nurses thought such information would improve care. Physicians stressed the importance of presenting the risk of thrombolytic-related intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions— This study suggests that a positively framed risk–benefit tool with graphical presentations of general and patient-specific risk estimates could support patients and providers in considering r-tPA for acute ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01864928.

Details

ISSN :
19417705 and 19417713
Volume :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ce0b5f34ed898e3f40a96e10ddf85f1f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.115.002003