Purpose: To assess the 1-year effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) enrolled in the LUMINOUS study., Methods: This 5-year, prospective, multicenter, observational, study enrolled 30,138 patients across all approved ranibizumab indications from outpatient ophthalmology clinics. 297 consenting patients (≥18 years) with mCNV who were treatment-naïve or prior-treated with ranibizumab or other ocular treatments were enrolled, and treated with ranibizumab according to the local product label. The main outcomes are visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters or equivalent), adverse events during the study, and treatment exposure over 1 year. Results are presented by prior treatment status of the study eye and injection frequency., Results: Of the 297 mCNV patients recruited in the study, 108 were treatment-naïve and 175 were prior ranibizumab-treated. At baseline, the mean age of patients was 57.6 years, and 59.0 years and 80.6% and 65.7% were female in the treatment-naïve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Most were Caucasian (treatment-naïve, 88.9%; prior ranibizumab-treated, 86.9%). The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) VA letter changes to 1 year were +9.7 (±17.99) from 49.5 (±20.51) and +1.5 (±13.15) from 58.5 (±19.79) and these were achieved with a mean (SD) of 3.0 (±1.58) and 2.6 (±2.33) injections in the treatment-naïve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Presented by injection frequencies 1-2, 3-4 and ≥5 injections in Year 1, the mean (SD) VA changes were +15.0 (±14.70), +7.7 (±19.91) and -0.7 (±16.05) in treatment-naïve patients and +1.5 (±14.57), +3.1 (±11.53) and -3.6 (±11.97) in prior ranibizumab-treated patients, respectively. The safety profile was comparable with previous ranibizumab studies., Conclusions: Ranibizumab treatment for mCNV showed robust VA gains in treatment-naïve patients and VA maintenance in prior ranibizumab-treated patients in a clinical practice setting, consisting mainly of Caucasians. No new safety signals were observed during the study., Competing Interests: Mr. Hamilton is a consultant for Allergan, Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Roche; receives grants from Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Roche; receives lecture fees from Allergan, Roche, Bayer Healthcare, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Drs Clemens and Dunger-Baldauf are employees and shareholders of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Dr. Minnella is a consultant for Theà Laboratoire and receives travel and meeting grant from Allergan, Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Theà Laboratoire Dr Lai is a Consultant for Allergan, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Roche; receives grants from Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Roche; receives lecture fees from Allergan, Bausch & Lomb, Bayer Healthcare, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Dr Dai receives research grants and non-financial support from Novartis. Dr. Sakamoto is a Consultant for Bayer Healthcare, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Bausch & Lomb, Senju and Santen; receives grants from Bayer Healthcare, Santen, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Senju; receives lecture fees from Bausch & Lomb, Bayer Healthcare, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Santen, and Senju. Dr Cheung receives consulting fees from Bayer, Novartis and Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche. Dr Ngah receives research grants for the study and lecture fees from Bayer, Novartis and Allergan. Prof Dr Holz receives grants from Bayer, Centervue, Genentech/Roche, Heidelberg Engineering, Novartis, and Zeiss, and is a consultant for Acucela, Alcon, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galimedix, Genentech, Heidelberg Engineering, Lin-Bioscience, Novartis, Roche, and Zeiss. These competing interests of the authors does not alter their adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.