Search

The REstarting Safe Education and Testing program for children with medical complexity was implemented in May 2021 at the University of Wisconsin to evaluate the feasibility of in-home rapid antigen COVID-19 testing among neurocognitively affected children. Parents or guardians administered BinaxNOW rapid antigen self-tests twice weekly for three months and changed to symptom and exposure testing or continued surveillance. In-home testing was feasible: nearly all (92.5%) expected tests were conducted. Symptomatic testing identified seven of nine COVID-19 cases. School safety perceptions were higher among those opting for symptom testing. Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT04895085. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S9):S878–S882. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306971 )

Preterm birth predisposes children to internalizing and externalizing behaviors that may persist into adolescence resulting in adult mental health conditions. Social and caregiving contexts, particularly for vulnerable infants born preterm, influence long-term outcomes, but mechanisms are not clearly understood. Healthcare teams caring for those born preterm face difficulty predicting who will be most affected by risk, who will most benefit, and the optimal timing of intervention. Differential susceptibility theory offers an alternative to the traditional risk-only assessments and theories by positing that individuals may be more, or less, susceptible to environmental influences. A sample of preterm- and term-born infants were followed from birth to 23 years of age. Mixed model repeated measures analyses of internalizing and externalizing behaviors were utilized for the comparison groups (N = 214; observations = 1070). Environmental contexts were indexed as proximal protection (low, moderate, high) and medical risk (low, moderate, high). Personal characteristic covariates of sex, race, socioeconomic status, and cognition were modeled. Internalizing behavior trajectories varied significantly over time. Early proximal protective environments conferred a sustained positive influence on behaviors. There is partial support for differential susceptibility theory suggesting that prematurity, as a malleability characteristic enables absorption of both the positive and negative influences of the environment, with greater intensity that those without malleability. The current analyses suggest lasting effects of the preschool age proximal environment on internalizing and externalizing behaviors in young adulthood for those born preterm. Understanding these nuances may aid healthcare professionals in the promotion and timing of interventions to support the child and family. The current manuscript reflects ongoing analyses of longitudinal data. No patient or public contribution to the analyses were required for testing the differential susceptibility theory. The authors would solicit patient or public contribution when implementing practice or policy changes based on the results.

Among the most intense adversity experiences for infants is premature birth. Early birth marks the beginning of a life course that broadly affects families, healthcare, education, social systems, and the survivors themselves. For many, the transition to adulthood is challenging and often hampered by cognitive, physical and mental health, and motor and independence difficulties.The aim of this study was to share a comprehensive protocol of a 10th follow-up study of premature infants in their 30s. The protocol accounts for stress during the neonatal period, the cumulative context (risk and protection) of development, biological and epigenetic mechanisms, and individual resilience.The prospective, five-group longitudinal design includes 215 term-born and preterm-born individuals with various neonatal morbidities at ages 30-35 years. Adult outcomes include health, adaptive, executive function, work, and social competence. Novel measures are four system indicators of allostatic load (AL) and epigenetics. Contextual measures include socioeconomic risk and individual resilience. All measures were selected based on coherence with constructs of the scientific aims, strong psychometrics, continuity for repeated measures, and minimal subject burden. Objective assessments include body composition imaging, exercise testing, blood and saliva collection, and actigraphy. The two-phase protocol takes approximately 8 hours.After an 11-month COVID-19 pause, participant response has been strong. As of May 2022, 75 participants have completed the full protocol, and 99 have consented to participate. When socioeconomic risk is controlled, we hypothesize that life course trajectories in physical and psychological health, adaptive function, and executive function will differ between term and preterm neonatal morbidity groups. AL will vary across groups and contribute to outcomes. We expect proximal protection and resilience to mediate the cumulative medical and socioeconomic risk and AL. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation, with estimates of age acceleration, will be examined across groups and explored in longitudinal associations with medical risk, socioeconomic status, and protection. To our knowledge, this is the only U.S. study of premature infants aged 30-35 years. With millions of preterm-born individuals reaching adulthood, the protocol incorporates molecular and genetic biomarkers in a life course developmental examination to inform the timing and content of interventions.

Background In people with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, viral eradication is associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objective To assess changes in HRQOL among participants receiving opioid agonist therapy undergoing treatment for HCV infection Methods COSTAR (NCT02251990) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Adults with HCV infection on opioid agonist therapy received elbasvir (50 mg)/grazoprevir (100 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. HRQOL was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute Form. Participants remained blinded until 4 weeks after end of treatment. Results Overall, 201 participants received elbasvir/grazoprevir and 100 participants received placebo. Treatment difference mean change from baseline scores (elbasvir/grazoprevir minus placebo) indicated an improvement in HRQOL at 4 weeks after end of treatment in participants receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir versus those receiving placebo, driven by declining HRQOL in those receiving placebo and improved HRQOL in certain domains among participants receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir. Notable differences in SF-36v2 scores were evident in the general health (mean treatment difference [MTD], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.37–10.63), vitality (MTD, 6.81; 95% CI, 1.88–11.75), and mental health (MTD, 5.17; 95% CI, 0.52–9.82) domains and in the mental component summary score (mean, 2.83; 95% CI, 0.29–5.37). No notable between-treatment differences were evident at treatment weeks 4 or 12. Conclusion HRQOL in patients receiving medication for opioid dependence was improved following treatment for HCV infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir, suggesting that eradication of HCV infection with direct-acting antivirals is associated with improved HRQOL.

BACKGROUND Assistance from medical devices is common for children with medical complexity (CMC) but introduces caregiving challenges. We tested the feasibility of “Tubes@HOME,” a mobile application supporting CMC family-delivered care using enteral care as a model. METHODS Caregivers of CMC with enteral tubes participated in a 30-day feasibility study of Tubes@HOME November 2020 through January 2021. Tubes@HOME was available on mobile devices and designed to support collaborative care and tracking over time. Key features include child profile, caregiving network management, care routines, feedback loop, and action plans. Care routines delineated nutrition, medication, and procedural tasks needed for the child: frequencies, completions, and reminders. Metadata summarized feature use among users. Feasibility was evaluated with postuse questionnaires and interviews. Measures of Tubes@HOME’s usability and usefulness included the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), System Usability Scale (SUS), and Acceptability and Use of Technology Questionnaire (AUTQ). RESULTS Among n = 30 children, there were 30 primary (eg, parent) and n = 22 nonprimary caregivers using Tubes@HOME. Children had a median (IQR) 10 (5.5–13) care routines created. For care routines created, 93% were marked complete at least once during the study period, with participants engaging with routines throughout study weeks 2 to 4. Results (mean [SD]) indicated low mental workload (TLX) 30.9 (12.2), good usability (SUS) 75.4 (14.7), and above-average usefulness (AUTQ) 4.0 (0.7) associated with Tubes@HOME, respectively. Interviews contextualized usefulness and suggested improvements. CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal use of Tubes@HOME among caregiving networks appeared feasible. Efficacy testing is needed, and outcomes could include reliability of care delivered in home and community.

Background and Purpose:Individuals with developmental disability (DD) often experience poor health outcomes, potentiated by healthcare inequities. Nurses have the potential to reduce these inequities through the quality of care provided. The quality of care provided by nursing students, the future generation of nurses, is affected by the attitudes of their clinical nursing faculty. The purpose of this study was to adapt and test an instrument to specifically measure the attitudes of clinical nursing faculty toward providing care to people with DD.Methods:The Disability Attitudes in Health Care (DAHC) instrument was adapted to create the new Developmental Disability Attitudes in Nursing Care (DDANC) instrument.Results:Content experts reviewed the DDANC for content validity (CVI = 0.88), followed by testing for internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.7). The study respondents had overall positive attitudes toward the care of people with DD.Conclusions:The DDANC is an acceptably valid and reliable instrument to assess attitudes of clinical nursing faculty toward providing care to people with DD.

Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Refereed/Peer-reviewed Aim: An integrative review was conducted to synthesize published evidence on the prevention and treatment of hypoglycaemia and patient risk factors, in adult patients treated for hyperkalaemia with intravenous insulin and dextrose. Methods: This review followed the framework by Whittemore and Knafl. Papers included were limited to English language studies involving participants who were aged 18 years and above and admitted in the inpatient acute care and emergency departments. The literature search was performed using five electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Proquest and Cochrane). Results: A total of 22 studies were included. Two main themes were derived—patient risk factors and prevention–intervention strategies. Five main patient risk factors were lower pretreatment blood glucose (

The COVID-19 lockdown and closure of schools, clinics, and community-based services put children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and other developmental disabilities (DDs) at increased risk of negative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate parents’ perceptions of their children’s behavioural outcomes during the COVID-19 lockdown, parents’ satisfaction with services during this time, and willingness to engage in telehealth. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Ireland. Parents (n = 89) completed an online questionnaire that included the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ-P). Results demonstrated that children with ASD/DDs were vulnerable to negative outcomes including hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, problems with peers and fewer prosocial behaviors. Children’s behavioral outcomes (‘current sample’, n = 89) were also compared with pre-COVID-19 data taken from the Growing Up in Ireland Study (‘GUI sample’, n = 327). The current sample exhibited significantly more behavioral difficulties than the pre-COVID GUI sample (p &lt, 0.001). For the current sample, scores on each of the five SDQ subscales were significantly associated with a total impact score, and parents reported dissatisfaction with support services provided and willingness to engage in behavioral telehealth. Commitment is required to identify barriers to services faced by families in Ireland and to address the need for adapted behavior support services during periods of emergency.

OBJECTIVES Current screening questions for pediatric tobacco smoke exposure are suboptimal. Factors influencing screening accuracy, particularly in the pediatric inpatient setting, are unknown. Our objective was to identify facilitators of and barriers to parental disclosure of smoke exposure when screened during their child’s hospitalization and strategies to promote accurate disclosure. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted with a convenience sample of parents of children admitted to the medical and surgical unit of a Midwest tertiary care children’s hospital. Eligible parents included those with documented disclosure of smoke exposure in the child’s electronic health record. A researcher trained in qualitative methods conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with parents regarding their experiences with smoke exposure screening in the inpatient pediatric setting. Two researchers independently identified concepts directed at barriers, facilitators, and strategies for effective screening, which were compared and reconciled by a third researcher. RESULTS Facilitators of disclosing their child’s smoke exposure included the following: (1) the caregiver’s internal characteristic(s) promoting disclosure, (2) perceived relevance of the screening question to the child’s health, and (3) the questioner being viewed positively. Barriers included the following: (1) fear of negative consequences, (2) a vague question, (3) lack of knowledge, (4) guilt, and (5) unconducive environment and timing. The strategies parents suggested to improve screening for smoke exposure included the following: (1) communicate preemptively, (2) provide specific exposure examples, (3) improve questioner-caregiver rapport, and (4) improve screening environment and timing. CONCLUSIONS Parents identified various mechanisms to improve tobacco smoke exposure screening. The facilitators, barriers, and strategies provide opportunities to improve the inpatient pediatric screening process.

Supplemental digital content is available in the text., AIM The specific aim of the study was to describe nursing faculty experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND Academic nursing experiences were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is concern that the resulting stress threatens nursing faculty emotional well-being. METHOD A descriptive, quantitative study was conducted, exploring faculty academic and clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, including perception of institutional support provided; faculty burnout, satisfaction, and well-being; and student support needs and well-being. RESULTS Analyses were performed on 117 quantitative and 49 qualitative responses. Participants perceived support from academic institutions and increased need to provide emotional support to students. Most reported negative effects on well-being but did not report high levels of burnout. CONCLUSION Nursing faculty are essential to the profession. Stress responses from the COVID-19 pandemic may not be fully realized. Nursing faculty require proactive and sustained institutional and personal support to provide exceptional ongoing education, build resilience, and support students.

Family caregivers use tools and technology to provide care for children with medical complexity (CMC) in the home. It is unclear what barriers families experience when using the tools and technology integral to the care and wellbeing of CMC. Our objective was to identify the barriers family caregivers experience in using tools and technology to provide care to CMC in the home. We used contextual inquiry to interview 30 caregivers in their homes and analyzed our data using a deductive content analysis informed by the patient work system (PWS) model and an inductive content analysis to identify emergent barriers. Through these combined analyses, we identified four categories of barriers families experienced using tools and technology to care for CMC: 1) Access and Cost; 2) Usability, which includes the subcategories Functionality, Tool design, Ease of use, and Reliability; 3) Short-term tool impact; and 4) Long-term tool impact. Our results point to the need for further interventions to reduce or mitigate tools and technology barriers to the in-home care for CMC.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Federal guidelines mandate that hospitals provide patients and caregivers with free, online access to their physician’s clinical notes. This study sought to identify parent perceptions of the benefits and challenges of real-time note access during their child’s hospitalization and strategies to optimize note-sharing at the bedside. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted with parents of children aged RESULTS The 28 interviewed parents described 6 benefits of having note access, which: provided a recap and improved their knowledge about their child’s care plan, enhanced communication, facilitated empowerment, increased autonomy, and incited positive emotions. Potential challenges included that notes: caused confusion, hindered communication with the health care team, highlighted problems with note content, and could incite negative emotions. Parents recommended 4 strategies to support sharing: provide preemptive communication about expectations, optimize the note release process, consider parent-friendly note template modifications, and offer informational resources for parents. CONCLUSIONS Findings provide a framework for operationalizing note-sharing with parents during hospitalization. These results have important implications for hospitals working to comply with federal regulations and researchers assessing the effects of increased information transparency in the inpatient setting.

Background: Diagnostic reasoning is the process of collecting, considering, and analyzing information to determine a diagnosis. Educational strategies that structure diagnostic reasoning exposure, experience, and evaluation are hypothesized to improve diagnostic safety. However, few studies measure diagnostic reasoning outcomes in nurse practitioner education. This review sought to identify the educational interventions intended to improve diagnostic reasoning competency, determine which components of reasoning are evaluated, and examine how they are measured. Method: Four databases were searched, and 12 studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Results: Simulation was the most common intervention. The most frequently measured diagnostic reasoning components were information gathering, differential diagnosis, and leading diagnosis. Checklists and patient management problems were the most used assessment method. Conclusion: More studies are needed to assess the reasoning processes of hypothesis generation, problem representation, and diagnostic justification. Within simulation, methods capable of capturing these components include think-aloud, global assessments, checklists, and note evaluation. [ J Nurs Educ . 2022;61(10):579–586.]

Teachers’ attitudes towards common disorders such as ADHD and anxiety are important to investigate, given that teachers play a significant role in the lives of young children. Implicit attitudes have not previously been investigated in this area. The current research aimed to explore teachers’ implicit and explicit gender-biased attitudes towards children with ADHD and anxiety. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) was used to measure implicit bias, and results were analyzed in relation to explicit measures. Results indicated that teachers (N = 38) showed implicit and explicit gender biases, however there were no significant relationships between the implicit and explicit measures. The research adds to the small pool of existing literature on the topic and has potential implications regarding teachers’ understanding of ADHD and anxiety.

Objective Elicit stakeholder perspectives on the anticipated benefits and challenges of sharing hospital physicians’ admission and daily progress notes with parents at the bedside during their child's hospitalization and identify strategies to aid implementation of inpatient note sharing. Methods Five semistructured focus groups were conducted with 34 stakeholders (8 parents, 8 nurses, 5 residents, 7 hospitalists, 6 administrators) at a tertiary children's hospital from October to November 2018 to identify anticipated benefits, challenges, and implementation strategies prior to sharing inpatient physicians’ notes. A facilitator guide elicited participants’ perspectives about the idea of sharing notes with parents during their child's hospitalization. Three researchers used content analysis to analyze qualitative data inductively. Results Anticipated benefits of sharing inpatient notes included: Reinforcement of information, improved parental knowledge and empowerment, enhanced parent communication and partnership with providers, and increased provider accountability and documentation quality. Expected challenges included: Increased provider workload, heightened parental confusion, distress or anxiety, impaired parent relationship with providers, and compromised note quality and purpose. Suggested implementation strategies included: Setting staff and parent expectations upfront, providing tools to support parent education, and limiting shared note content and family eligibility. Conclusions Stakeholders anticipated multiple benefits and drawbacks of sharing notes with parents during their child's hospital stay and made practical suggestions for ways to implement inpatient note sharing to promote these benefits and mitigate challenges. Findings will inform the design and implementation of an intervention to share notes using an inpatient portal and evaluation of its effect on child, parent, and healthcare team outcomes.

OBJECTIVES The chronic conditions and functional limitations experienced by children with medical complexity (CMC) place them at disproportionate risk for COVID-19 transmission and poor outcomes. To promote robust vaccination uptake, specific constructs associated with vaccine hesitancy must be understood. Our objective was to describe demographic, clinical, and vaccine perception variables associated with CMC parents’ intention to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey (June–August 2021) for primary caregivers of CMC between ages 5 to 17 at an academic medical center in the Midwest. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between vaccination intent and selected covariates. RESULTS Among 1330 families, 65.8% indicated vaccination intent. In multivariable models, demographics had minimal associations with vaccination intent; however, parents of younger children (1 complex chronic condition (vs 1), had higher adjusted odds of vaccination intent (1.82 [1.14–2.92] and 1.77 [1.16–2.71], respectively). Vaccine perceptions associated with vaccine intention included “My doctor told me to get my child a COVID-19 vaccine” (2.82 [1.74–4.55]); and “I’m concerned about my child’s side effects from the vaccine” (0.18 [0.12–0.26]). CONCLUSIONS One-third of CMC families expressed vaccine hesitation; however, constructs strongly associated with vaccination intent are potentially modifiable. Pediatrician endorsement of COVID-19 vaccination and careful counseling on side effects might be promising strategies to encourage uptake.

Differential susceptibility theory posits that some individuals, with specific characteristics, are more, or less susceptible than others, to both adverse and beneficial environmental influences. It offers a perspective for understanding the directional trajectories across the life course affected by daily context and individual characteristics, in order to identify influential components. The aim of this article is to describe differential susceptibility theory, critically evaluate research findings in which the theory is tested, and consider implications of differential susceptibility theory as a theoretical framework for nursing science. Preterm birth trajectories and outcomes research are used as a lens for this examination.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after successful treatment may reduce the benefits of cure among people who inject drugs.To evaluate the rate of HCV reinfection for 3 years after successful treatment among people receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT).A 3-year, long-term, extension study of persons enrolled in the CO-STAR (Hepatitis C Patients on Opioid Substitution Therapy Antiviral Response) study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02105688).55 clinical trial sites in 13 countries.Aged 18 years and older with chronic HCV infection with genotypes 1, 4, or 6 receiving stable OAT.No treatments were administered.Serum samples were assessed for HCV reinfection. Urine drug screening was performed.Among 296 participants who received treatment, 286 were evaluable for reinfection and 199 were enrolled in the long-term extension study. The rate of HCV reinfection was 1.7 [95% CI, 0.8 to 3.0] per 100 person-years; 604 person-years of follow-up). A higher rate of reinfection was seen among people with recent injecting drug use (1.9 [95% CI, 0.5 to 4.8] per 100 person-years; 212 person-years). Ongoing drug use and injecting drug use were reported by 59% and 21% of participants, respectively, at the 6-month follow-up visit and remained stable during 3 years of follow-up.Participants were required to be 80% adherent to OAT at baseline and may represent a population with higher stability and lower risk for HCV reinfection. Rate of reinfection may be underestimated because all participants did not continue in the long-term extension study; whether participants who discontinued were at higher risk for reinfection is unknown.Reinfection with HCV was low but was highest in the first 24 weeks after treatment completion and among people with ongoing injecting drug use and needle-syringe sharing.Merck SharpDohme Corp., a subsidiary of MerckCo., Inc.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Hospitalized children with medical complexity (CMC) are at high risk of medical errors. Their families are an underutilized source of hospital safety data. We evaluated safety concerns from families of hospitalized CMC and patient/parent characteristics associated with family safety concerns. METHODS We conducted a 12-month prospective cohort study of English- and Spanish-speaking parents/staff of hospitalized CMC on 5 units caring for complex care patients at a tertiary care children’s hospital. Parents completed safety and experience surveys predischarge. Staff completed surveys during meetings and shifts. Mixed-effects logistic regression with random intercepts controlling for clustering and other patient/parent factors evaluated associations between family safety concerns and patient/parent characteristics. RESULTS A total of 155 parents and 214 staff completed surveys (>89% response rates). 43% (n = 66) had ≥1 hospital safety concerns, totaling 115 concerns (1–6 concerns each). On physician review, 69% of concerns were medical errors and 22% nonsafety-related quality issues. Most parents (68%) reported concerns to staff, particularly bedside nurses. Only 32% of parents recalled being told how to report safety concerns. Higher education (adjusted odds ratio 2.94, 95% confidence interval [1.21–7.14], P = .02) and longer length of stay (3.08 [1.29–7.38], P = .01) were associated with family safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Although parents of CMC were infrequently advised about how to report safety concerns, they frequently identified medical errors during hospitalization. Hospitals should provide clear mechanisms for families, particularly of CMC and those from disadvantaged backgrounds, to share safety concerns. Actively engaging patients/families in reporting will allow hospitals to develop a more comprehensive, patient-centered view of safety.

IMPORTANCE: The rate of postoperative death in children undergoing tonsillectomy is uncertain. Mortality rates are not separately available for children at increased risk of complications, including young children (aged

Objective This study investigates how team cognition occurs in care transitions from operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU). We then seek to understand how the sociotechnical system and team cognition are related. Background Effective handoffs are critical to ensuring patient safety and have been the subject of many improvement efforts. However, the types of team-level cognitive processing during handoffs have not been explored, nor is it clear how the sociotechnical system shapes team cognition. Method We conducted this study in an academic, Level 1 trauma center in the Midwestern United States. Twenty-eight physicians (surgery, anesthesia, pediatric critical care) and nurses (OR, ICU) participated in semi-structured interviews. We performed qualitative content analysis and epistemic network analysis to understand the relationships between system factors, team cognition in handoffs and outcomes. Results Participants described three team cognition functions in handoffs—(1) information exchange, (2) assessment, and (3) planning and decision making; information exchange was mentioned most. Work system factors influenced team cognition. Inter-professional handoffs facilitated information exchange but included large teams with diverse backgrounds communicating, which can be inefficient. Intra-professional handoffs decreased team size and role diversity, which may simplify communication but increase information loss. Participants in inter-professional handoffs reflected on outcomes significantly more in relation to system factors and team cognition ( p < 0.001), while participants in intra-professional handoffs discussed handoffs as a task. Conclusion Handoffs include team cognition, which was influenced by work system design. Opportunities for handoff improvement include a flexibly standardized process and supportive tools/technologies. We recommend incorporating perspectives of the patient and family in future work.