Search

Purpose: Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure. Materials: A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected. Methods: Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels. Results: Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure. Conclusions: The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term. Clinical impact With this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.

BACKGROUND: Management of juxta-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAA) remains challenging. Both open surgical and endovascular options are feasible, however, there is lack of level 1 evidence to support one modality over the other. Operative interventions frequently necessitate either open repair with a suprarenal clamp positioning (ORSRC) or complex endovascular repair (EVAR) with fenestrated (fEVAR) or parallel stent grafts (chEVAR). AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the renal function deterioration and mortality between ORSRC and fEVAR in patients who were operated on for unruptured JRAAA at a tertiary centre. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study of patients. SETTING: Tertiary vascular unit in the United Kingdom. POPULATION: Patients with unruptured juxta-renal AAA. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent repair for unruptured JRAAA between March 2008 and October 2019. Analysis of short and mid-term outcomes after ORSRC (occlusion of the aorta above at least one of the main renal arteries) and fEVAR was conducted. Patients who underwent open repair of JRAAA with an infrarenal clamp were excluded. Procedural data as well as data regarding complications was noted. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease were defined using the KDIGO criteria (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). Renal impairment data up to 1 year and mortality up to 5 years was recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 162 patients who underwent JRAAA repair met the inclusion criteria (60.5% of them having ORSRC). Approximately, 85.8% of the population were males (80.6% in the open group compared to 93.7% in the endovascular group; p=0.019). The mean age for patients in the open group was 74.0 (SD=±5.5) years compared to 76.1 (SD=±7.2) years in the fEVAR group (p=0.035). More patients in the ORSRC group were symptomatic (18.4% versus 6.3% in the fEVAR group; p=0.028) and they also had larger aneurysms compared to the fEVAR group (66.9 (±12.7) mm versus 62.6 (±8.6) mm, respectively; p=0.021). In the ORSRC group, all patients required suprarenal clamping, with clamping above only one of the main renal arteries carried out in 43 patients (44.3%) of cases. At baseline, 37.0% and 44.5% of patients had CKD stage 3 or worse in ORSRC and fEVAR groups, respectively (p=0.759). Approximately 47.6% of patients having ORSRC had evidence of acute renal impairment on post-operative day 3 compared to 12.7% of those in the endovascular group (p

Despite an increasing elderly population there is limited evidence regarding the surveillance and management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in octogenarians. This study investigated outcomes of patients aged ≥85 years undergoing AAA surveillance to identify whether discontinuation of surveillance might be safe.This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients aged 85 years undergoing surveillance with a small (30-54 mm) AAA between January 2007 and November 2017. Patients were stratified depending on aneurysm diameter at index (40 mm, 40-50 mm,50 mm). A threshold of 55 mm was used to decide intervention in all patients. Subsequent management of threshold aneurysms, aneurysm related and all cause mortality were also collected.One hundred and one patients were included (88 male, mean diameter at index 45 mm, median follow up 56.0 months). The majority of patients (72.3%) undergoing surveillance had not reached threshold at the end of follow up. Only one patient in the40 mm group developed a threshold aneurysm, compared with five (11.6%) and 22 (75.9%) in the 40-50 mm and50 mm groups, respectively (p .0001). Of the 28 patients reaching threshold, eight (28.6%) underwent surgical repair (5 standard endovascular, one complex endovascular, and two open). Twenty-six (25.7%) patients died during follow up, with cardiorespiratory pathologies being the leading cause of death. Only three aneurysm related deaths were observed, including two fatal ruptures and one death following repair from an infected stent graft (all in the50 mm index group).The present data suggests that discontinuation of aneurysm surveillance in patients aged 85 years with aneurysms 40 mm might be safe. In patients with a larger aneurysm or those approaching threshold, early assessment of fitness for surgery may prevent unnecessary surveillance. The decision to treat aneurysms reaching threshold is complex but is appropriate in selected patients.

Objectives There has been a clear move towards endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms owing to better peri-operative outcomes compared with open surgical repair. However, follow-up has continued to reveal relatively high rates of endoleaks and re-interventions. Improvements in endovascular stent-grafts aim to decrease these complications. This systematic review aims to determine the early outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing. Methods Standard PRISMA guidelines were followed. A literature search was performed with the aim to extract any publication related to the endovascular aneurysm sealing device. Results The total number of patients in this systematic review of 11 studies is 684, with a mean age of 73.2 years, and 587 (88.0%) males. The majority were undergoing elective procedures ( n = 606, 91.0%), the remainder as emergencies ( n = 30, 4.5% as ruptures, n = 30, 4.5% as symptomatic). Technical success rate including emergency cases was 99.1%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 2.6% ( n = 17) including all cases, and 1.0% ( n = 6) including elective cases only. Thirty -day endoleak detection rate was 4.7% ( n = 31) including all cases, and 4.8% ( n = 29) including elective cases only. Thirty-day aneurysm-related re-intervention rate was 5.7% ( n = 38) including all cases, and 4.6% ( n = 28) including elective cases only. There was no conversion to open surgery within 30 days post-op in the elective cases. There were three delayed conversions to open surgery within 30 days and one report of stent migration causing rupture in the emergency setting. Conclusions This novel endovascular aneurysm-sealing device for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has shown respectable early outcomes. Good technical success rates, in both elective and emergency settings, low rates of all-type endoleaks and low re-intervention rates have all been demonstrated. It is proving to be a safe alternative to open and endovascular aneurysm repair; however, longer term follow-up results are needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the device in the long term.

Clinically, taping is believed to alter muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) whether taping across the upper trapezius (UT) muscle influenced the level of UT and lower trapezius (LT) muscle activity and the ratio of these activities (UT/LT ratio) during a static typing task; and (2) if the activity of these muscles varied with the application of tensioned taping. Forty-two healthy participants performed a 15-min typing task on three separate occasions under one of three conditions: taping applied perpendicular to the UT fibers with tension; taping without tension; and no taping. Activity of the UT and LT muscles was assessed using surface electromyography. Between conditions, significant differences were found in the change of the normalized amplitude in the UT activity ( p =.027) and UT/LT ratio ( p =.024) but not in the LT activity ( p =.93). Compared with the no taping condition, the UT activity was less in both the tensioned taping ( p =.009) and the non-tensioned taping ( p =.004). There was no difference between the two taping conditions in the change of the UT ( p =.91) activity and the UT/LT ratio ( p =.92). In conclusion, both tensioned and non-tensioned taping across the UT muscle reduces its activity during a typing task.

Objective: To evaluate 2 different aortic endograft systems with suprarenal fixation in patients with unfavorable neck morphology. Methods: A prospective observational study assigning patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with unfriendly neck anatomy treated with 2 different endograft systems (Endurant and Zenith) was conducted. The log-rank test was applied to investigate the differences in cumulative outcome parameters. Results: Successful endograft implantation was achieved in all patients. Requirement for troubleshooting techniques was similar in the 2 groups ( P = .156 and P = .081, respectively). In-hospital procedure-related morbidity occurred in 7 patients (Zenith vs Endurant, P = .690). Freedom from any type of endoleak and overall mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (log-rank test, P = .068 and P = .087). Reinterventions were more commonly required in the Zenith group (log-rank rest, P = .041), and were all nongraft/aneurysm-related. Conclusions: Similar performances of the Zenith and the Endurant endograft systems were demonstrated.

Background There is no international consensus regarding the optimum management of infected aortae (mycotic aneurysms, infected aortic grafts). Neoaortoiliac reconstruction has advantages over extra-anatomical bypass grafting; however, the use of autologous vein is associated with venous hypertension and compartment syndrome, alternatively cadaveric homografts are associated with high rates of perianastomotic hemorrhage, limb occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm. Arterial repair using xenoprosthetic patches is associated with lower infection rates compared to the use of prosthetic material. The aim of this case series and literature review is to report the use of xenoprosthetic bovine biomaterial for neoaortic repair of mycotic aneurysmal disease and infected aortic grafts. Methods Patients with evidence of infected aortic grafts or mycotic aneurysms who were suitable for open aortic surgery were included. Following removal of the graft/excision of the aneurysmal sac, a 10 × 16 cm XenoSure Biologic Surgical Patch (LeMaitre, Germany) was rolled into a tube, or bifurcated tube graft, and secured with prolene sutures. Proximal and distal anastomoses were conducted as per standard aortic anastomoses. Patients were continued on long-term antibiotics and surveyed with computerized tomography at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Six patients underwent bovine aortic repair between 2013 and 2015: an infected Dacron aortobi-iliac graft causing iliac pseudoaneurysm, an infected Dacron aortic graft from open repair later relined with endovascular stent graft, a mycotic iliac aneurysm, and 3 mycotic aortic aneurysms. All were treated with bovine reconstructed aortic grafts or patches. Patients had a median age of 69.5 years (range 67–75), with perioperative and 30-day mortality of 0%. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 2–23). Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed no evidence of infection at the operative site in all patients. Freedom from reinfection and reintervention was 100%. Conclusions Xenoprosthetic (bovine) neoaortic grafts are an alternative method to treat infected aortae with excellent short-term freedom from infection and reintervention. Optimum duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy remains undetermined. Further cases and longer follow-up are required to determine the true efficacy of this technique.