Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison between open repair with suprarenal clamping and fenestrated endovascular repair for unruptured juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Edizioni Minerva Medica, 2021.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Management of juxta-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JRAAA) remains challenging. Both open surgical and endovascular options are feasible, however, there is lack of level 1 evidence to support one modality over the other. Operative interventions frequently necessitate either open repair with a suprarenal clamp positioning (ORSRC) or complex endovascular repair (EVAR) with fenestrated (fEVAR) or parallel stent grafts (chEVAR). AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the renal function deterioration and mortality between ORSRC and fEVAR in patients who were operated on for unruptured JRAAA at a tertiary centre. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study of patients. SETTING: Tertiary vascular unit in the United Kingdom. POPULATION: Patients with unruptured juxta-renal AAA. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent repair for unruptured JRAAA between March 2008 and October 2019. Analysis of short and mid-term outcomes after ORSRC (occlusion of the aorta above at least one of the main renal arteries) and fEVAR was conducted. Patients who underwent open repair of JRAAA with an infrarenal clamp were excluded. Procedural data as well as data regarding complications was noted. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease were defined using the KDIGO criteria (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). Renal impairment data up to 1 year and mortality up to 5 years was recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 162 patients who underwent JRAAA repair met the inclusion criteria (60.5% of them having ORSRC). Approximately, 85.8% of the population were males (80.6% in the open group compared to 93.7% in the endovascular group; p=0.019). The mean age for patients in the open group was 74.0 (SD=±5.5) years compared to 76.1 (SD=±7.2) years in the fEVAR group (p=0.035). More patients in the ORSRC group were symptomatic (18.4% versus 6.3% in the fEVAR group; p=0.028) and they also had larger aneurysms compared to the fEVAR group (66.9 (±12.7) mm versus 62.6 (±8.6) mm, respectively; p=0.021). In the ORSRC group, all patients required suprarenal clamping, with clamping above only one of the main renal arteries carried out in 43 patients (44.3%) of cases. At baseline, 37.0% and 44.5% of patients had CKD stage 3 or worse in ORSRC and fEVAR groups, respectively (p=0.759). Approximately 47.6% of patients having ORSRC had evidence of acute renal impairment on post-operative day 3 compared to 12.7% of those in the endovascular group (p
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Context (language use)
Risk Assessment
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
Aneurysm
Postoperative Complications
Risk Factors
medicine
Humans
education
1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Aged
Retrospective Studies
education.field_of_study
business.industry
Mortality rate
Endovascular Procedures
Acute kidney injury
Stent
Retrospective cohort study
General Medicine
Length of Stay
medicine.disease
Constriction
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Cardiovascular System & Hematology
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Kidney disease
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fdf9e26873b1811c6353f72e06c4dbcc