Search

PURPOSE Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response. CONCLUSION The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875 ).

Malignant pheochromocytomas (PHEOs)/paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare tumors for which clinical outcomes remain poorly defined and therapeutic options are limited. Approximately 27% carry pathogenic germline succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) mutations; the presence of such mutations has been correlated with response to temozolomide (TMZ). We aimed to investigate the association between germline mutations in SDHx and response to TMZ. We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic malignant PHEO/PGLs treated with TMZ- based chemotherapy at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2003 and 2020. The correlation between response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and the presence of SDHx mutations in the germline and tumor was evaluated. Nineteen patients received TMZ. Seventeen underwent germline assessment: 9 (53%) carried a pathogenic SDHx germline mutation. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1: 6 (40%) partial response, 4 (27%) stable disease, and 5 (33%) progressive disease. Overall median progression-free survival was 2.2 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 58%. Median PFS was 1.3 years and 5.5 years for carriers and non-carriers, respectively and OS was 1.5 years and not estimable for carriers and non-carriers, respectively. The response by PERCIST criteria in nine patients correlated with the RECIST 1.1 assessment. Our series represents one of the largest analyses of patients with malignant PHEOs/PGLs treated with TMZ who have available germline data. The incidence of pathogenic germline SDHx mutations was similar to what has been previously published, though our analysis suggests that there may be a limited association between response to TMZ and pathogenic germline SDHx mutations.

Treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus improves progression-free survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, but it is not known if the addition of a VEGF pathway inhibitor to an mTOR inhibitor enhances antitumor activity. We performed a randomized phase II study evaluating everolimus with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. One hundred and fifty patients were randomized to receive everolimus 10 mg daily with or without bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. Patients in both arms also received standard dose octreotide. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, based on local investigator review. Treatment with the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab resulted in improved progression-free survival compared to everolimus (16.7 months compared to 14.0 months; one-sided stratified log-rank p=0.1028; HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.56–1.13), meeting the predefined primary endpoint. Confirmed tumor responses were observed in 31% (95% CI 20%, 41%) of patients receiving combination therapy, as compared to only 12% (95% CI 5%, 19%) of patients receiving treatment with everolimus (P=0.0053). Median overall survival duration was similar in the everolimus and combination arm (42.5 months and 42.1 months, respectively). Treatment-related toxicities were more common in the combination arm. In summary, treatment with everolimus and bevacizumab led to superior progression-free survival and higher response rates compared to everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Although the higher rate of treatment related adverse events may limit the use of this combination, our results support the continued evaluation of VEGF pathway inhibitors in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

MAF file for copy number variations identified in the cohort

Treatment history for patients enrolled on the PancSeq protocol.

Supplementary Figure S1: Overview of workflow and data generation. Supplementary Figure S2: Analysis of neoplastic cellularity. Supplementary Figure S3: Recurrent copy number alterations. Supplementary Figure S4: Mutational signature analysis. Supplementary Figure S5: Analysis of PDAC gene expression signatures. Supplementary Figure S6: Clinically relevant alterations in the cohort.

Supplementary Experimental Methods

MAF file for mutations identified in the cohort

Purpose:Receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in colorectal cancers are rare, but potentially therapeutically relevant. We describe clinical, molecular, and pathologic attributes of RTK fusion–associated colorectal cancer.Experimental Design:We identified all cases with RTK fusions in patients with colorectal cancer seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) who underwent OncoPanel testing between 2013 and 2018. Clinical, histologic, and molecular features were extracted from the patient charts and molecular testing results.Results:We identified 12 driver oncogenic fusions in various RTKs. These fusions occurred exclusively in BRAF and RAS wild-type tumors and were enriched in right-sided and mismatch repair–deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancers. All of the MMR-D colorectal cancers with RTK fusions were found in tumors with acquired MMR-D due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and one was associated with a sessile serrated polyp. Molecular profiles of MMR-D colorectal cancer with RTK fusions largely resembled BRAF V600E–mutated MMR-D colorectal cancer, rather than those secondary to Lynch syndrome. We describe two patients with fusion-associated microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer who derived clinical benefit from therapeutic targeting of their translocation. The first harbored an ALK-CAD fusion and received sequential crizotinib and alectinib therapy for a total of 7.5 months until developing an ALK L1196Q gatekeeper mutation. The second patient, whose tumor contained an ROS1-GOPC fusion, continues to benefit from entrectinib after 9 months of therapy.Conclusions:RTK fusions in colorectal cancer are a rare, but important disease subgroup that occurs in RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors. Despite enrichment in acquired MMR-D tumors, RTK fusions also occur in MSS colorectal cancer and provide an important therapeutic target.

Supplementary Figure 1. Pan-TRK IHC in four cases identified as having NTRK fusions by OncoPanel analysis shows strong cytoplasmic staining confirming the presence of functional TRK fusion protein (40Ã-). Top left image demonstrates the specificity of TRK staining, which is present only in neoplastic cells, whereas adjacent normal crypts are negative. Supplementary Figure 2A. Two cases of ALK fusion in our cohort shared clinical and molecular features but differed in their microsatellite status. Both tumors were APC wild-type (wt) and contained biallelic RNF43 frameshift (fs) mutations. B. Copy number variation by chromosome is color-coded for two ALK fusion-associated colon cancers in our cohort. ALK+MMR-D cancer (top) displays a diploid genome, whereas ALK+MSS cancer (bottom) displays frequent copy number gains and losses. ALK fusion breakpoints are shown in both profiles (arrow). The vertical axis is the ratio of the number of reads for each specimen and a panel of normals in log base 2 scale. A value of 0 denotes no difference from normal (diploid). Supplementary Figure 3A. MMR-D RTK fusion CRC cases display a diploid genome similar to those in other MMR-D cases: BRAF V600E+mutated and Lynch syndrome. Copy number profile plots of RTK fusions or Wnt fusions with MSS CRC show extensive gains and losses and are shown for comparison. 3B. All MMR-D subgroups: BRAF V600E+, Lynch syndrome and RTK fusion show a significantly higher homopolymer indel rate (top) and TMB (bottom) than do MSS tumors with either RTK fusions or Wnt fusions. Supplementary Figure. 4. Histologic analysis with hematoxylin and eosin stained slides for two patients with NTRK1-LMNA fusions. Morphological analysis shows: A. mucinous and B. medullary histology.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by their expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This trial investigated the activity of Ziv-aflibercept, a recombinant protein that binds to and inhibits the activity of VEGF, in patients with advanced NETs (NCT01782443).A single-arm, phase II trial enrolling patients with advanced, progressive extrapancreatic NET. Patients were treated with Ziv-aflibercept 4 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle; the starting dose was reduced to 2 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle because of hypertension-related events. The primary end point was progression-free survival.The trial enrolled 19 patients (13 male:6 female). Patients received a median of 7 cycles (range, 1-18 cycles). The median progression free survival was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.2-16.1 months), and the median overall survival was 36.4 months (95% confidence interval, 16.1-not reached). Best responses by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 are as follows: 1 (5%) partial response, 13 (68%) stable disease, 2 (10%) with progressive disease, and 3 (15%) unevaluable. Hypertension occurred in 18 patients (95%), including grade 3-4 hypertension in 12 patients (63%).Although the progression free survival is similar to other VEGF inhibitors in NET, toxicity may preclude further investigation.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare cancers that may arise in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. The fundamental mechanisms driving gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET growth remain incompletely elucidated; however, the heterogeneous clinical behavior of GEP-NETs suggests that both cellular lineage dynamics and tumor microenvironment influence tumor pathophysiology. Here, we investigated the single-cell transcriptomes of tumor and immune cells from patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Malignant GEP-NET cells expressed genes and regulons associated with normal, gastrointestinal endocrine cell differentiation and fate determination stages. While tumor and lymphoid compartments sparsely expressed immunosuppressive targets, infiltrating myeloid cells were enriched for alternative immunotherapy pathways includingVSIR, Tim3/Gal9, andSIGLEC10. Finally, analysis of paired primary and metastatic tissue specimens from small intestinal NETs demonstrated transcriptional transformation between the primary tumor and its distant metastasis. Our findings highlight the transcriptomic heterogeneity that distinguishes the cellular landscapes of GEP-NET anatomic subtypes and reveal potential avenues for future precision medicine therapeutics.

Reported incidences of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) appear to be increasing, possibly due to greater disease awareness and increased accuracy of diagnosis. Approximately 20% of patients with NETs develop carcinoid syndrome (CS), which arises from elevated secretion of bioactive compounds, including serotonin, from NETs. This leads to symptoms including diarrhea and flushing, which result in weight loss and are associated with considerable negative impact on patients' quality of life. We previously reported significant weight gain and improved nutritional status in patients with NETs who were treated with telotristat ethyl (TE) for 12 weeks. In this follow-up analysis, using pooled data from the 36-week open-label extensions of the TELESTAR (NCT01677910) and TELECAST (NCT02063659) phase III trials, we demonstrate that improvements in weight and nutritional parameters were sustained or further improved in patients with CS through to week 48 of treatment with TE. At week 48/end of study, 68.7% of all patients maintained a stable weight or had weight gain and the mean changes from baseline in cholesterol and albumin levels in patients treated with TE were +0.41 mmol/L and -0.34 g/L, respectively. These results indicate that TE, alongside routine clinical practice, may provide long-term benefits in nutritional intake and weight evolution in patients with CS.

Objective Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) recommend complete (R0) surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases, if feasible. However, large multicenter studies of recurrence patterns of GEPNETs after resection have not been performed. Methods Patients 18 years or older who presented to 7 participating National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions between 2004 and 2008 with a new diagnosis of a small bowel, pancreas, or colon/rectum neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and underwent R0 resection of the primary tumor, and synchronous metastases, if present, were included in this analysis. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate recurrence rates and time-associated end points, respectively. Results Of 294 patients with GEPNETs, 50% were male, 88% were White, and 99% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. The median age was 55 years (range, 20-90). The median follow-up time from R0 resection was 62.1 months. Recurrence rates were 18% in small bowel NETs (n = 110), 26% in pancreatic NETs (n = 141), and 10% in colon/rectum NETs (n = 50). The frequency of surveillance imaging was highly variable. Conclusions R0 resection was associated with variable risk of recurrence across subtypes. Further research to inform refinement of guidelines for the appropriate duration of surveillance after R0 resection is needed.

We report the impact of 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment on abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flushing, symptoms that patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors often find burdensome. Methods: All patients enrolled in the international randomized phase 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy (NETTER-1) trial (177Lu-DOTATATE plus standard-dose octreotide long-acting repeatable [LAR], n = 117; high-dose octreotide LAR, n = 114) were asked to record the occurrence of predefined symptoms in a daily diary. Change from baseline in symptom scores (mean number of days with a symptom) was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures. Results: Patients (intent-to-treat) who received 177Lu-DOTATATE experienced a significantly greater decline from baseline in symptom scores than patients who received high-dose octreotide LAR. For 177Lu-DOTATATE, the mean decline in days with abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flushing was 4.10, 4.55, and 4.52 d per 4 wk, respectively, compared with 0.99, 1.44, and 2.54 d for high-dose octreotide LAR. The mean differences were 3.11 d (95% CI, 1.35–4.88; P = 0.0007) for abdominal pain, 3.11 d (1.18–5.04; P = 0.0017) for diarrhea, and 1.98 d (0.08–3.88; P = 0.0413) for flushing, favoring 177Lu-DOTATATE. A positive repeated-measures correlation was found between diary-recorded symptom scores and questionnaire-recorded pain, diarrhea, and flushing. Conclusion: In addition to efficacy and quality-of-life benefits, symptom diaries from NETTER-1 demonstrated that treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE was associated with statistically significant reductions in abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flushing, constituting the core symptoms of patients with progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumors, compared with high-dose octreotide LAR, supporting a beneficial effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE on health-related quality of life. Title in Web of Science: Symptom Diaries of Patients with Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with Lu-177-DOTATATE

Background: Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) signaling is important in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) biology, but little is known regarding IGF1R expression and patient characteristics and outcomes. Methods: In 365 patients with resected PDAC, we evaluated IGF1R protein expression using IHC on whole-slide sections and IGF1R genomic status using next-generation sequencing. Associations of IGF1R expression, measured by H-scores incorporating staining intensity and proportion of positive tumor cells, with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in 317 and 321 patients, respectively, using Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors. Results: Higher IGF1R expression in tumor cells was associated with worse DFS comparing highest versus lowest expression tertiles [median DFS, 10.8 vs. 16.1 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24–2.44; Ptrend = 0.002] and worse OS (median OS, 17.4 vs. 25.8 months; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00–1.92; Ptrend = 0.046). The association between high IGF1R expression and reduced DFS was identified primarily among patients with a preoperative body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 (HR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.03–8.96, comparing extreme tertiles; Pinteraction = 0.032). KRAS-mutant tumors had greater IGF1R expression, and IGF1R expression in tumor epithelium was inversely correlated with that in stromal cells. Mutations in IGF1R were infrequent, and no overt loss-of-function alterations were identified. Higher IGF1R expression was modestly associated with higher gene copy number (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.26, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Higher IGF1R protein expression was associated with worse patient outcomes in resected PDAC. Impact: IGF1R expression in PDAC represents a potential biomarker to guide patient selection for more aggressive, multidrug regimens in the adjuvant setting.

Background Telotristat ethyl is approved to treat carcinoid syndrome diarrhea in combination with somatostatin analogs. In TELESTAR and TELECAST phase III studies, patients with carcinoid syndrome received telotristat ethyl 250 or 500 mg 3 times per day (tid) or placebo tid in addition to somatostatin analogs. The aim of this prespecified analysis was to examine the time to reductions in bowel movements (BMs) in the TELESTAR and TELECAST studies using survival analysis methods. Methods First occurrence of sustained response was defined as the time to the first day of 2 consecutive weeks with a mean BM frequency improvement of ≥ 30% from baseline during the 12-week double-blind treatment periods. Time to first ≥ 30% worsening in BM frequency was also measured. Treatments were compared with the log-rank test; Cox regression models provided point and confidence interval estimates of the hazard ratios for each trial. Results In TELESTAR and TELECAST, majority of patients (69%) on telotristat ethyl experienced a sustained ≥ 30% improvement in BM frequency. The median time to sustained reduction of at least 30% in BM frequency was significantly faster (fewer days to onset) for telotristat ethyl compared with placebo in both TELESTAR (250 mg, HR = 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3–4.1, P = 0.004]; 500 mg, HR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2–3.9, P = 0.009]) and TELECAST (250 mg, HR = 3.9 [95% CI, 1.6–11.1, P = 0.003]; 500 mg, HR = 4.2 [95% CI, 1.7–11.7, P = 0.002]). In TELECAST, 42% of patients on placebo experienced sustained worsening in BM frequency compared with 20% on telotristat ethyl; no significant difference was observed in TELESTAR. Conclusion The time of onset of sustained BM frequency improvement mean and range are important when considering use of telotristat ethyl in patients with carcinoid syndrome diarrhea. Telotristat ethyl may also reduce sustained worsening in BM frequency. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01677910, NCT02063659

Background Although an increasing number of treatments have become available for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs), there remains little consensus on treatment sequence and its impact on health care resource use (HRU). We sought to describe treatment patterns and HRU, in a cohort of patients with metastatic GEP‐NETs treated at a tertiary referral center in the U.S. Materials and Methods We identified patients with a well‐differentiated, metastatic GEP‐NET evaluated at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute between July 2003 and May 2015. For these patients, we describe the sequence of treatment regimens received for their disease, together with associated HRU. Results We identified 682 patients with advanced GEP‐NETs. Of these patients, 597 (87.0%) initiated ≥1 treatment over the follow‐up period. The mean age at diagnosis was 58.5 years, 50.2% were men, and 94.0% were white. A total of 83.1% initiated a somatostatin analog (SSA) as their first‐line treatment, with 55% and 31% of patients continuing with second‐ and third‐line therapies. A total of 31.2% of patients with SSAs underwent dose escalation to above standard dose. In this setting, patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were more commonly treated with cytotoxic regimens than other NET tumor types and also had higher HRU. Conclusion Our study suggests that, at a tertiary referral center, patients with advanced NETs commonly received multiple courses of treatments. Our data suggest a clear preference for use of SSAs as a first‐line treatment for patients with advanced NETs, with SSAs commonly escalated and continued throughout the course of treatment in combination with other regimens. Implications for Practice The current study demonstrates the common use of somatostatin analog as a first‐line therapy for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as the incorporation of multiple different treatment regimens in the treatment course of patients with this disease., This article focuses on treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs) and health resource use among patients with advanced GEP‐NETs treated at a tertiary referral center in the United States.

PURPOSE An inherited basis for presumed sporadic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) has been suggested by evidence of familial clustering of NET and a higher incidence of second malignancies in patients and families with NET. To further investigate a potential heritable basis for sporadic neuroendocrine tumors, we performed multigene platform germline analysis to determine the frequency of hereditary susceptibility gene variants in a cohort of patients with sporadic small intestine NET (SI-NET). METHODS We performed a multigene platform germline analysis with Invitae's 83-gene, next-generation sequencing panel using DNA from 88 individuals with SI-NET from a clinically annotated database of patients with NET evaluated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) who are considered high risk for inherited variants. Additionally, we evaluated the prevalence of pathogenic variants in an unselected cohort of patients with SI-NET who underwent testing with Invitae. RESULTS Of the 88 patients in the DFCI cohort, a pathogenic germline variant was identified in eight (9%) patients. In an independent cohort of 120 patients with SI-NET, a pathogenic germline variant was identified in 13 (11%) patients. Pathogenic variants were identified in more than one patient in the following genes: ATM, RAD51C, MUTYH, and BLM. Somatic testing of tumors from the DFCI cohort was suboptimal because of insufficient coverage of all targeted exons, and therefore, analysis was limited. CONCLUSION We demonstrate a 9%-11% incidence of pathogenic germline variants in genes associated with inherited susceptibility for malignancy not previously described in association with SI-NET. The association of these germline variants with neuroendocrine carcinogenesis and risk is uncertain but warrants further characterization.

[Introduction] Telotristat ethyl is indicated for use in combination with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) to treat carcinoid syndrome (CS) diarrhea uncontrolled by SSAs alone in adults, but long-term safety and efficacy data beyond 48 weeks are needed., [Objectives] The aims of the study were to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of telotristat ethyl and its effect on quality of life (QOL) in patients with CS., [Methods] In this phase 3, nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label, long-term extension study (TELEPATH), patients who participated in phase 2 or 3 trials of telotristat ethyl continued treatment at their present dose level (250 or 500 mg thrice daily) for 84 weeks. Safety and tolerability, the primary endpoint, were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, AEs of special interest (AESIs; including liver-related AEs, depression, and gastrointestinal AEs), and deaths. The secondary objective was to evaluate changes in patients’ QOL using validated cancer questionnaires and a subjective global assessment of CS symptoms, [Results] In 124 patients exposed to telotristat ethyl for a mean of 102.6 ± 53.2 weeks, the type and frequency of AEs were consistent with those reported in previous trials. The occurrence of AESIs was not related to dosage or duration of therapy. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity, and no deaths were related to telotristat ethyl. QOL scores remained stable, and the majority of patients reported adequate symptom relief throughout the study., [Conclusions] Safety results of TELEPATH support the long-term use of telotristat ethyl in patients with CS diarrhea. Telotristat ethyl was well-tolerated and associated with sustained improvement in QOL scores (NCT02026063)., This study was supported and conducted by Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare resources even in wealthy nations, necessitating rationing of limited resources without previously established crisis standards of care protocols. In Massachusetts, triage guidelines were designed based on acute illness and chronic life-limiting conditions. In this study, we sought to retrospectively validate this protocol to cohorts of critically ill patients from our hospital. DESIGN: We applied our hospital-adopted guidelines, which defined severe and major chronic conditions as those associated with a greater than 50% likelihood of 1- and 5-year mortality, respectively, to a critically ill patient population. We investigated mortality for the same intervals. SETTING: An urban safety-net hospital ICU. PATIENTS: All adults hospitalized during April of 2015 and April 2019 identified through a clinical database search. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 365 admitted patients, 15.89% had one or more defined chronic life-limiting conditions. These patients had higher 1-year (46.55% vs 13.68%; p < 0.01) and 5-year (50.00% vs 17.22%; p < 0.01) mortality rates than those without underlying conditions. Irrespective of classification of disease severity, patients with metastatic cancer, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and neurodegenerative disease had greater than 50% 1-year mortality, whereas patients with chronic lung disease and cirrhosis had less than 50% 1-year mortality. Observed 1- and 5-year mortality for cirrhosis, heart failure, and metastatic cancer were more variable when subdivided into severe and major categories. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with major and severe chronic medical conditions overall had 46.55% and 50.00% mortality at 1 and 5 years, respectively. However, mortality varied between conditions. Our findings appear to support a crisis standards protocol which focuses on acute illness severity and only considers underlying conditions carrying a greater than 50% predicted likelihood of 1-year mortality. Modifications to the chronic lung disease, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis criteria should be refined if they are to be included in future models.

Background Carcinoid syndrome is associated with a reduced quality of life that can be attributed to symptoms such as diarrhea and fatigue as well as social and financial issues. This study was conducted to psychometrically assess meaningful change in bowel movement frequency among carcinoid syndrome patients using data from the TELESTAR clinical study. Methods An anchor-based approach for deriving meaningful change thresholds consisted of mapping change from baseline bowel movement frequency to other patient-reported assessments of change. These included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) Diarrhea Symptom responders, the EORTC Gastrointestinal NET questionnaire (GI.NET21) GI Symptom responders, and reported adequate relief at Week 12 (≥ 10-point score decrease from Day 1 to Week 12). Parameters included within-group mean change from baseline to Week 12, t-tests of the change (Wilcoxon rank sum for adequate relief), and effect size. Results There were 135 carcinoid syndrome patients with a mean baseline frequency of 5.7 bowel movements a day. A distribution-based method yielded meaningful change estimates of 0.62 bowel movements a day for overall frequency and 0.83 bowel movements a day at Week 12. Anchor-based analysis indicated a large effect size among patients who reported adequate relief at Week 12 (− 1.58; n = 18; P = 0.014), the QLQ-C30 Diarrhea domain responders (− 1.24; n = 40; P n = 25; P = 0.005). Exit interview data for meaningful change yielded effect size estimates of − 1.57 for overall change during the Double-blind Treatment Period and − 1.97 for change between Baseline and Week 12. Conclusions Meaningful change derivation is critical to interpret patient outcomes for evaluating treatment efficacy. In this study, carcinoid syndrome patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in bowel movement frequency of ≥30% over 12 weeks with telotristat ethyl treatment. Trial registration NCT01677910.

Most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) do not produce excess hormones and are therefore considered ‘non-functional’1–3. As clinical behaviors vary widely and distant metastases are eventually lethal2,4, biological classifications might guide treatment. Using enhancer maps to infer gene regulatory programs, we find that non-functional PNETs fall into two major sub-types whose epigenomes and transcriptomes partially resemble islet alpha and beta cells. Transcription factors ARX and PDX1 specify these normal cells, respectively5,6, and 84% of 142 non-functional PNETs expressed one or the other factor, occasionally both. Among 103 cases, distant relapses occurred almost exclusively in patients with ARX+PDX1− tumors and, within this sub-type, in cases with alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). These markedly different outcomes belied similar clinical presentations and histology and, in one cohort, occurred irrespective of MEN1 mutation. This robust molecular stratification provides insight into cell lineage correlates of non-functional PNETs, accurately predicts disease course, and can inform post-operative clinical decisions.

Aim: Evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and SNPs in patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors receiving sunitinib. Patients & methods: Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between SNPs and survival outcomes using data from a sunitinib Phase IV (genotyped, n = 56) study. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze objective response rate and genotype associations. Results: After multiplicity adjustment, progression-free and overall survivals were not significantly correlated with SNPs; however, a higher objective response rate was significantly associated with IL1B rs16944 G/A versus G/G (46.4 vs 4.5%; p = 0.001). Conclusion: IL1B SNPs may predict treatment response in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. VEGF pathway SNPs are potentially associated with survival outcomes.

Background Using data from four tertiary referral centers in the U.S., we assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Subjects, materials, and methods We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung NETs treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was histologically confirmed typical/atypical carcinoid tumor diagnosis date. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and lung NET-related health care resource use from index date through last contact/death. Time to treatment discontinuation and first progression, time from first to second progression, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results We identified 83 patients; 19 (23%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone (56%) or in combination with other therapies (6%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (9%), liver-directed therapy (LDT) (4%), and everolimus/other (5%). Sixty patients had second-line therapy including SSA alone (18%) or in combination (40%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (17%), everolimus (12%), LDT (7%), EBRT (3%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation were as follows: SSAs, 43.3; cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3.6. Overall median time (months) to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 12.4. Median OS (months) following treatment initiation was 66.4 for all patients and 81.5 for patients receiving SSAs. Conclusion SSAs, alone and in combination, are common treatments for advanced lung NETs. Patients have additional treatment options and relatively long survival compared with patients with other advanced cancers. Treatment pattern assessment following approval of newer treatments is needed. Implications for practice Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, EBRT, liver-directed therapy, and targeted therapies are common treatments for locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SSAs alone or in combination with other treatment modalities were the most common first- and second-line therapy, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients continued treatment with SSAs long-term with median treatment duration of 43 months. Median overall survival was 66 months following initiation of first-line therapy for all patients. Treatment pattern assessment beyond the time period of this study is needed given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for lung NETs that will likely be incorporated in the treatment landscape.

Background We assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) at four large tertiary referral centers in the U.S. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years at advanced GI NET diagnosis, treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was the histologically confirmed diagnosis date of locally advanced/metastatic GI NET. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and GI NET-related health care resource utilization from index date through last contact or death. Time-to-event analyses, including treatment discontinuation, progression, and overall survival (OS), were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results We identified 273 patients; 156 (57%) had primary ileum NET, and 174 (64%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analog (SSA) alone (89%) or in combination (2%), liver-directed therapy (LDT; 8%), and cytotoxic chemotherapy or interferon (2%). One hundred fifty-five patients continued with second-line therapy, including SSA alone (17%) or in combination (75%, with 3% combined with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy), LDT (4%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation was 154.0 for SSAs and 3.8 for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall median time to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 30.3 months. Median OS (months) following first-line initiation was 151.8 for all patients and 178.9 for first-line SSA. Conclusion Our study illustrates the common use of SSAs in both first-line and subsequent treatment of patients with GI NETs, as well as the relatively long survival durations and multiple additional treatments received by patients with this condition. Treatment pattern assessment at later times, following approval of newer treatments, is warranted. Implications for practice This study, assessing treatment patterns over a period of up to 30 years, showed that SSAs, LDT, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and interferon are common treatments for advanced GI NETs. SSAs alone or in combination with other treatments were the most frequent therapy in first and subsequent lines. Patients in this study remained on SSAs long-term, with median treatment duration of 12.8 years in first line. Treatment patterns should be assessed beyond this study's time period, given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for GI NET, which will likely be incorporated in the continuum of care of patients.

TPS4177 Background: The anti–PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (ATEZO) prevents PD-L1 from interacting with PD-1 and B7.1, thus reinvigorating antitumor T cell activity. Anti-VEGF bevacizumab (BEV) increases dendritic cell maturation, enhances T cell infiltration, and reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells in tumors. ATEZO + BEV is FDA approved for first-line treatment of advanced HCC based on the IMbrave 150 study. Locoregional radiotherapy (e.g., Y90 TARE) enhances the diversity of the intratumoral T cell receptor repertoire and increases tumor antigen release. We hypothesize that the Y90 TARE + BEV + ATEZO combination induces synergistic tumor killing and prolongs progression-free survival in patients (pts) receiving Y90 TARE (HR = 0.6 when compared to Y-90 TARE alone). Methods: Eligible pts have HCC that cannot be surgically resected (confirmed by pathology review), is at least BCLC stage B, and is outside Milan criteria. Other requirements include ECOG PS of 0-1 at screening, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, no prior systemic therapy, and FLR estimated at ≥ 40% post local therapy. Pts must have a pretreatment liver biopsy taken and then be randomized 1:1 to TARE (Arm A) or TARE + ATEZO + BEV (Arm B). Pts will have TARE mapping followed by TARE treatment. In Arm B, pts will begin TARE treatment followed by BEV + ATEZO (4 wks [± 1 wk] later). Pts will have abdominal MRI or CT scans every 12 weeks and CT scans of the chest every 24 wks. The primary study objective is to assess and compare pts' progression-free survival (per mRECIST 1.1) in each study arm. The main secondary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5) of pts in Arm B. Exploratory objectives are to define the use of cellular and circulating biomarkers in the prediction of improved clinical outcomes of pts in Arm B. Symptoms experienced by pts in both arms using patient-reported outcomes will be assessed. Disease progression will be captured by both RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. We plan to assess the safety of Y90 TARE + BEV + ATEZO in the first 10 pts randomized to Arm B for two cycles, and if there are no grade ≥ 3 unexpected toxicities possibly, probably, or definitely related to combined TARE + BEV + ATEZO, continue to accrue 128 pts in total (current enrollment n- = 5). Pts will continue study treatment (Arm B) for a total of 24 months from initiation of TARE or until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occur, whichever is earlier. Enrollment began in September 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04541173.

4004 Background: Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective tumor response. Retrospective and small, prospective studies suggest that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is associated with high response rates (RR) and relative long progression-free survival (PFS). This trial was conducted to establish a role for the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide. Methods: E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide (200 mg/m2 PO QD days 1-5) vs. capecitabine/temozolomide (capecitabine 750 mg/m2 PO BID days 1-14; temozolomide 200 mg/m2 PO QD days 10-14) in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. Eligibility criteria included: metastatic or unresectable, low or intermediate grade pancreatic NETs, progression within preceding 12 months, and no prior temozolomide, DTIC, capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), RR, safety, and MGMT as evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and promoter methylation. Allowing for 5% ineligibility, 145 randomized patients were required to obtain 138 eligible patients to detect a difference in median PFS of 9 versus 14 months (hazard ratio of 0.64) using a two-sided log-rank test at the overall 0.20 significance level with 81% power. Results: 144 patients were enrolled between 4/2013 to 3/2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine/temozolomide (n = 72); the efficacy analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide vs. 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for this final primary endpoint (stratified log rank p = 0.022. In the final analysis (5/2021), median OS was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (HR = 0.82, p = 0.42) and RR was 34% for temozolomide and 40% for capecitabine/temozolomide (p = 0.59). Capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 AEs (45% vs. 22%, p = 0.005). MGMT deficiency, defined as either low IHC or positive promoter methylation, was associated with greater odds of response (OR [95% CI] = 6.38 [2.19, 18.60] and 9.79 [1.09, 87.71], respectively). Conclusions: E2211 is the first prospective randomized trial of capecitabine/temozolomide and shows the longest PFS and highest RR reported for patients with pancreatic NETs in a prospective randomized study. MGMT deficiency was associated with greater odds of objective response. Clinical trial information: NCT01824875.

Background Hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia are class effects of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors such as everolimus. This post hoc pooled analysis assessed the potential impact of these events on the efficacy of everolimus. Methods Patients with advanced, low- or intermediate-grade pancreatic, gastrointestinal, or lung neuroendocrine tumors received either oral everolimus at 10 mg/d or a placebo in the RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors 3 (RADIANT-3) and RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors 4 (RADIANT-4) trials. A landmark progression-free survival (PFS) analysis by central review was performed for patients treated for at least 16 weeks (n = 308) and according to the occurrence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) within this treatment period. Results The overall PFS with everolimus from the pooled analysis was 11.4 months (95% confidence interval, 11.01-13.93 months), which was consistent with the findings of RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4. Overall, 19.1% and 9.8% of patients in RADIANT-3 and 11.9% and 6.4% of patients in RADIANT-4 developed any-grade hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia, respectively (regardless of the study drug). The duration of everolimus exposure was longer in patients who developed these AEs versus patients without these AEs. Overall, 308 patients were exposed to treatment for at least 16 weeks (hyperglycemia, 39 of 269 patients; hypercholesterolemia, 20 of 288 patients). No association was observed between the development of these AEs and PFS (18.8 and 14.1 months with and without hyperglycemia, respectively, and 14.1 and 14.8 months with and without hypercholesterolemia, respectively). Conclusions Although limitations apply because of the small number of AEs observed, there was no significant impact of these AEs on PFS; this suggests similar efficacy in the presence or absence of these events.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the impact of systemic markers of inflammation on the outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with everolimus or placebo (as measured by baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR]). METHODS Patient data (gastrointestinal, pancreatic, and lung NETs) from 2 large phase 3 studies, RADIANT-3 (n = 410) and RADIANT-4 (n = 302), were pooled and analyzed. The primary end point was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In the pooled population, elevated LMR (median PFS, 11.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 9.3-13.7; hazard ratio, 0.69; P < 0.001) and reduced NLR (median PFS, 10.8 months; 95% confidence interval, 9.2-11.7; hazard ratio, 0.75; P = 0.0060) correlated with longer PFS among all patients. These markers were also found to be prognostic in the everolimus- and placebo-treated subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Data from this study suggest that LMR and NLR are robust prognostic markers for NETs and could potentially be used to identify patients who may receive or are receiving the most benefit from targeted therapies. As both are derived from a complete blood count, they can be routinely used in clinical practice, providing valuable information to clinicians and patients alike.

Background Sunitinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) in a phase III trial. The efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with panNETs were confirmed in an open-label phase IV trial. Objective To assess the clinical benefit with sunitinib using the combined data from these trials. Patients and methods An updated overall survival (OS) in patients with panNETs for the phase IV trial was provided, and an analysis of results from the sunitinib-treated combined cohort from the phase III and IV trials (combined cohort) was conducted to assess PFS, OS, and objective response rate (ORR). Results The updated median OS for the phase IV trial was 54.1 months (95% CI 37.9–not reached). Investigator-assessed median PFS for the combined cohort (n = 102) was 12.9 months (95% CI 7.4–16.7) with a significant benefit versus placebo in the phase III trial (n = 35) (HR 0.429; 95% CI 0.245–0.752; p = 0.001). Median OS could not be calculated for the combined cohort or placebo group due to the high number of patients censored; however, the estimated HR of 0.303 (CI 0.100–0.921; p = 0.013) favored sunitinib. ORR for the combined cohort was 16.7% (95% CI 10.0–25.3). Sunitinib was well tolerated in both trials with a safety profile similar to previously seen in other studies. Conclusions The combined analysis of these studies confirms the objective tumor responses and improvements in PFS observed in the initial phase III trial, providing further support for the clinical benefit of sunitinib in patients with advanced panNETs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT00428597 and NCT01525550.

We report the impact of

Purpose: Receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in colorectal cancers are rare, but potentially therapeutically relevant. We describe clinical, molecular, and pathologic attributes of RTK fusion–associated colorectal cancer. Experimental Design: We identified all cases with RTK fusions in patients with colorectal cancer seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) who underwent OncoPanel testing between 2013 and 2018. Clinical, histologic, and molecular features were extracted from the patient charts and molecular testing results. Results: We identified 12 driver oncogenic fusions in various RTKs. These fusions occurred exclusively in BRAF and RAS wild-type tumors and were enriched in right-sided and mismatch repair–deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancers. All of the MMR-D colorectal cancers with RTK fusions were found in tumors with acquired MMR-D due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and one was associated with a sessile serrated polyp. Molecular profiles of MMR-D colorectal cancer with RTK fusions largely resembled BRAF V600E–mutated MMR-D colorectal cancer, rather than those secondary to Lynch syndrome. We describe two patients with fusion-associated microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer who derived clinical benefit from therapeutic targeting of their translocation. The first harbored an ALK-CAD fusion and received sequential crizotinib and alectinib therapy for a total of 7.5 months until developing an ALK L1196Q gatekeeper mutation. The second patient, whose tumor contained an ROS1-GOPC fusion, continues to benefit from entrectinib after 9 months of therapy. Conclusions: RTK fusions in colorectal cancer are a rare, but important disease subgroup that occurs in RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors. Despite enrichment in acquired MMR-D tumors, RTK fusions also occur in MSS colorectal cancer and provide an important therapeutic target.

Purpose The camptothecin (CPT) analogs topotecan and irinotecan specifically target topoisomerase I (topoI) and are used to treat colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. Response rate for this class of drug varies from 10% to 30%, and there is no predictive biomarker for patient stratification by response. On the basis of our understanding of CPT drug resistance mechanisms, we developed an immunohistochemistry-based predictive test, P-topoI-Dx, to stratify the patient population into those who did and did not experience a response. Patients and Methods The retrospective validation studies included a training set (n = 79) and a validation cohort (n = 27) of gastric cancer (GC) patients, and 8 cohorts of colorectal cancer (CRC) patient tissue (n = 176). Progression-free survival for 6 months was considered a positive response to CPT-based therapy. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides were immunohistochemically stained with anti–phospho-specific topoI-Serine10 (topoI-pS10), quantitated, and analyzed statistically. Results We determined a threshold of 35% positive staining to offer optimal test characteristics in GC. The GC (n = 79) training set demonstrated 76.6% (95% confidence interval, 64-86) sensitivity; 68.8% (41-88) specificity; positive predictive value (PPV) 92.5% (81-98); and negative predictive value (NPV) 42.3% (24-62). The GC validation set (n = 27) demonstrated 82.4% (56-95) sensitivity and 70.0% (35-92) specificity. Estimated PPV and NPV were 82.4% (56-95) and 70.0% (35-92) respectively. In the CRC validation set (n = 176), the 40% threshold demonstrated 87.5% (78-94) sensitivity; 70.0% (59-79) specificity; PPV 70.7% (61-79); and NPV 87.0 % (77-93). Conclusion The analysis of retrospective data from patients (n = 282) provides clinical validity to our P-topoI-Dx immunohistochemical test to identify patients with disease that is most likely to respond to topoI inhibitors.

Patients who are incarcerated are a vulnerable patient population and may suffer from less access to routine cancer screenings compared to their non-incarcerated counterparts. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of potential differences in cancer diagnosis staging is needed. We sought to examine whether there are differences in cancer stage at initial diagnosis between non-incarcerated and incarcerated patients by pursuing a retrospective chart review from 2010-2017 for all patients who were newly diagnosed with cancer at an urban safety net hospital. Incarceration status was determined by insurance status. Our primary outcome was incarceration status at time of initial cancer diagnosis. Overall, patients who were incarcerated presented at a later cancer stage for all cancer types compared to the non-incarcerated (+.14 T stage, p = .033; +.23 N stage, p < .001). Incarcerated patients were diagnosed at later stages for colorectal (+0.93 T stage, p < .001; +.48 N stage, p < .001), oropharyngeal (+0.37 N stage, p = .003), lung (+0.60 N stage, p = .018), skin (+0.59 N stage, p = 0.014), and screenable cancers (colorectal, prostate, lung) as a whole (+0.23 T stage, p = 0.002; +0.17 N stage, p = 0.008). Incarcerated patients may benefit from more structured screening protocols in order to improve the stage at presentation for certain malignancies.

OBJECTIVE Given the lack of consensus on surveillance guidelines after pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) resection, we assessed outcomes in a large cohort of patients with nonmetastatic, surgically resected PanNETs. METHODS Data of patients with PanNETs resected between 1990 and 2017 were retrospectively collected using databases at 3 academic institutions. The National Death Index was queried to determine vital status. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates. Variables associated with recurrence and disease-related death were identified through Cox multivariate analyses. RESULTS Of 307 patients with PanNET who underwent resection, recurrence occurred in 79 (26%) of patients. For stage I and II disease, 5-year RFS rates were 90% and 43%, whereas 5-year DSS rates were 98% and 86% (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0038, respectively). For grades 1, 2, and 3 disease, 5-year RFS rates were 87%, 49%, and 18%, and 5-year DSS rates were 98%, 89%, and 51% (P < 0.0001 for both). Stage II, grade 2, and grade 3 disease were each associated with increased recurrence and disease-specific death. CONCLUSIONS Stage and grade are important prognostic factors that should be utilized to tailor postsurgical surveillance after curative resection of PanNET.

OBJECTIVES: The immune environment and the potential for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors remain largely unexplored. We assessed immune checkpoint marker expression, lymphocytic infiltrate, and associated mutational profiles in a cohort of small intestine and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: We assessed expression of PDCD1 (PD-1), CD274 (PD-L1) and PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2 ) in archival tissue from 64 small intestine (SINET) and 31 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET). We additionally assessed T cell infiltrates, categorizing T cell subsets based on expression of the T cell markers CD3, CD8, CD45RO (PTPRC) or FOXP3. Finally, we explored associations between immune checkpoint marker expression, lymphocytic infiltrate and tumor mutational profiles. RESULTS: Expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 in small intestine or pancreatic NET was rare, while expression of PD-L2 was common in both NET subtypes. T-cell infiltrates were more abundant in pNET than in SINET. We found no clear associations between immune checkpoint marker expression, immune infiltrates, and specific mutational profile within each tumor type. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide an initial assessment of the immune environment of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Further studies to define the immunologic differences between pNET and SINET, as well as the role of PD-L2 in these tumors, are warranted.

Clinically relevant subtypes exist for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but molecular characterization is not yet standard in clinical care. We implemented a biopsy protocol to perform time-sensitive whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing for patients with advanced PDAC. Therapeutically relevant genomic alterations were identified in 48% (34/71) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations in 18% (13/71) of patients. Overall, 30% (21/71) of enrolled patients experienced a change in clinical management as a result of genomic data. Twenty-six patients had germline and/or somatic alterations in DNA-damage repair genes, and 5 additional patients had mutational signatures of homologous recombination deficiency but no identified causal genomic alteration. Two patients had oncogenic in-frame BRAF deletions, and we report the first clinical evidence that this alteration confers sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibition. Moreover, we identified tumor/stroma gene expression signatures with clinical relevance. Collectively, these data demonstrate the feasibility and value of real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC. Significance: Molecular analyses of metastatic PDAC tumors are challenging due to the heterogeneous cellular composition of biopsy specimens and rapid progression of the disease. Using an integrated multidisciplinary biopsy program, we demonstrate that real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC can identify clinically relevant alterations that inform management of this difficult disease. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1096–111. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047

177Lu-DOTATATE is a radiolabeled somatostatin analog that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in adults. Radionuclide therapies have been administered for many years within nuclear medicine departments in North America. However, in comparison to other radiotherapies, 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy involves more planning, coordination, concomitant medication administration (antiemetic medications and amino acids), and direct patient care. To date, various methods have been used in multiple centers during the NETTER-1 trial and the provision of patient care. As participants in the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial and the subsequent expanded-access program for the administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE studies, as well as recently starting postapproval clinical care, we have administered 61 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies at the time of this manuscript submission (13 in the NETTER-1 trial, 39 in the expanded-access program, and 9 clinically) at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and here share our procedures, personnel training, and workflow to help other centers establish programs for this FDA-approved 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Malignancy is accompanied by changes in the metabolism of both cells and the organism1,2. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with wasting of peripheral tissues, a metabolic syndrome that lowers quality of life and has been proposed to decrease survival of patients with cancer3,4. Tissue wasting is a multifactorial disease and targeting specific circulating factors to reverse this syndrome has been mostly ineffective in the clinic5,6. Here we show that loss of both adipose and muscle tissue occurs early in the development of pancreatic cancer. Using mouse models of PDAC, we show that tumour growth in the pancreas but not in other sites leads to adipose tissue wasting, suggesting that tumour growth within the pancreatic environment contributes to this wasting phenotype. We find that decreased exocrine pancreatic function is a driver of adipose tissue loss and that replacement of pancreatic enzymes attenuates PDAC-associated wasting of peripheral tissues. Paradoxically, reversal of adipose tissue loss impairs survival in mice with PDAC. When analysing patients with PDAC, we find that depletion of adipose and skeletal muscle tissues at the time of diagnosis is common, but is not associated with worse survival. Taken together, these results provide an explanation for wasting of adipose tissue in early PDAC and suggest that early loss of peripheral tissue associated with pancreatic cancer may not impair survival.

Time to Sustained Improvement in Bowel Movement Frequency With Telotristat Ethyl : Analysis of the Phase 3 TELESTAR Study

Background: In a phase III study, sunitinib led to a significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs). This study was a post-marketing commitment to support the phase III data. Methods: In this ongoing, open-label, phase IV trial (NCT01525550), patients with progressive, advanced unresectable/metastatic, well-differentiated panNETs received continuous sunitinib 37.5 mg once daily. Eligibility criteria were similar to those of the phase III study. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.0 (RECIST). Other endpoints included PFS per Choi criteria, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Sixty-one treatment-naive and 45 previously treated patients received sunitinib. By March 19, 2016, 82 (77%) patients had discontinued treatment, mainly due to disease progression. Median treatment duration was 11.7 months. Investigator-assessed median PFS per RECIST (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 13.2 months (10.9–16.7): 13.2 (7.4–16.8) and 13.0 (9.2–20.4) in treatment-naive and previously treated patients, respectively. ORR (95% CI) per RECIST was 24.5% (16.7–33.8) in the total population: 21.3% (11.9–33.7) in treatment-naive and 28.9% (16.4–44.3) in previously treated patients. Median OS, although not yet mature, was 37.8 months (95% CI, 33.0–not estimable). The most common treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (53.8%), diarrhoea (46.2%), and leukopenia (43.4%). Conclusions: This phase IV trial confirms sunitinib as an efficacious and safe treatment option in patients with advanced/metastatic, well-differentiated, unresectable panNETs, and supports the phase III study outcomes. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of sunitinib.

Introduction Well- or moderately differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are often slow-growing, and some patients with unresectable, asymptomatic, non-functioning tumors may face the choice between watchful waiting (WW), or somatostatin analogues (SSA) to delay progression. We developed a comprehensive multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to help patients and physicians clarify their values and preferences, consider each decision criterion, and support communication and shared decision-making. Methods The framework was adapted from a generic MCDA framework (EVIDEM) with patient and clinician input. During a workshop, patients and clinicians expressed their individual values and preferences (criteria weights) and, on the basis of two scenarios (treatment vs WW; SSA-1 [lanreotide] vs SSA-2 [octreotide]) with evidence from a literature review, expressed how consideration of each criterion would impact their decision in favor of either option (score), and shared their knowledge and insights verbally and in writing. Results The framework included benefit-risk criteria and modulating factors, such as disease severity, quality of evidence, costs, and constraints. Overall and progression-free survival being most important, criteria weights ranged widely, highlighting variations in individual values and the need to share them. Scoring and considering each criterion prompted a rich exchange of perspectives and uncovered individual assumptions and interpretations. At the group level, type of benefit, disease severity, effectiveness, and quality of evidence favored treatment; cost aspects favored WW (scenario 1). For scenario 2, most criteria did not favor either option. Conclusions Patients and clinicians consider many aspects in decision-making. The MCDA framework provided a common interpretive frame to structure this complexity, support individual reflection, and share perspectives. Funding Ipsen Pharma. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-017-0653-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Sunitinib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNET). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined partial responses (PR; classically defined as ≥30% size decrease from baseline) are infrequent. Methods: Individual data of pNET patients from the phase II [NCT00056693] and pivotal phase III [NCT00428597] trials of sunitinib were analysed in this investigator-initiated, post-hoc study. The primary objective was to determine the optimal RECIST (v.1.0) response cut-off value to identify patients who were progression-free at 11 months (median PFS in phase III trial); and the most informative time-point (highest area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and logistic regression) for prediction of benefit (PFS) from sunitinib. Results: Data for 237 patients (85 placebo; 152 sunitinib [n=66 50mg “4-weeks on/2-weeks off” schedule; n=86 “37.5mg continuous daily dosing (CDD)”]) and 788 scans were analysed. The median PFS for sunitinib and placebo were 9.3 months (95%-CI 7.6-12.2) and 5.4 months (95%-CI 3.5-6.01), respectively (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.43 (95%-CI 0.29-0.62); p

OBJECTIVES Dysregulation of the cell cycle has been observed and implicated as an etiologic factor in a range of human malignancies, but remains relatively unstudied in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We evaluated expression of key proteins involved in cell cycle regulation in a large cohort of NETs. METHODS We evaluated immunohistochemical expression of CDKN1B, CDKN1A, CDKN2A, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, cyclin E1, and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (phospho-RB1) in a cohort of 267 patients with NETs. We then explored associations between cell cycle protein expression, mutational status, histologic features, and overall survival. RESULTS We found that high expression of CDK4, CDK6, CCND1, and phospho-RB1 was associated with higher proliferative index, as defined by MKI67. We additionally observed a trend toward shorter overall survival associated with low expression of CDKN1B. This association seemed strongest in SINETs (multivariate hazards ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.93; P = 0.03). We found no clear association between CDKN1B mutation and protein expression. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that dysregulation and activation of the CDK4/CDK6-CCND1-phospho-RB1 axis is associated with higher proliferative index in NETs. Investigation of the therapeutic potential of CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors in higher grade NETs is warranted.