Search

Background: The etiology of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in individuals without known cardiovascular heart disease remains elusive in nearly half of all patients after systematic testing. We investigated the relationship between stressful life events and SCA risk in cases of explained and unexplained SCA (USCA) events. Methods: Individuals who previously experienced SCA were enrolled prospectively and divided into a USCA or explained SCA (ESCA) subgroup dependent on whether a diagnosis was ascribed after SCA. Participants completed either the 1997 Recent Life Changes Questionnaire, Student Stress Scale, or Social Re-adjustment Rating Scale for Non-Adults recalling events during the year preceding their SCA, depending on age at SCA presentation; all measure stress in life change units (LCUs). SCA group scores were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group. Results: We compared 36 SCA group participants (22 USCA, 14 ESCA, age 47 ± 15 years, age at SCA 40 ± 14 years, 50% male) with 36 control participants (age 47 ± 15 years, 50% male). There was no significant difference in LCU score between the control group and the SCA group (248 ± 181 LCU vs 252 ± 227 LCU; P > .05). The ESCA subgroup had significantly lower mean LCU scores than the USCA subgroup (163 ± 183 LCU vs 308 ± 237 LCU; P = .030). Conclusions: Stressful life events, especially those producing chronic stress, might predispose otherwise healthy individuals to lethal arrhythmias. Further investigation into the role of stress in SCA precipitation is warranted. Résumé: Contexte: La cause de l’arrêt cardiaque subit (ACS) chez les personnes n’ayant pas de maladie cardiovasculaire connue demeure nébuleuse dans près de la moitié des cas, même après des examens systématiques. Nous avons étudié la relation entre les événements stressants de la vie et le risque d’ACS chez des patients présentant un ACS expliqué (ACSe) ou inexpliqué (ACSi). Méthodologie: Des sujets ayant déjà subi un ACS ont été recrutés de manière prospective et répartis en deux sous-groupes (ACSe et ACSi), selon qu’un diagnostic a pu ou non être posé après l’ACS. On a demandé aux participants de répondre au questionnaire RLCQ (Recent Life Changes Questionnaire, questionnaire sur les changements de vie récents, version de 1997), au questionnaire SSS (Student Stress Scale, échelle d’évaluation du stress vécu par les étudiants) ou au questionnaire SRRS (Social Readjustment Rating Scale, échelle d’évaluation du réajustement social) pour les non-adultes en repensant aux événements survenus dans l’année précédant l’ACS, selon leur âge au moment de l’ACS; tous ces questionnaires mesurent le stress en unités de changement de vie (UCV). Les scores des patients ayant subi un ACS ont été comparés à ceux de sujets témoins appariés selon l’âge et le sexe. Résultats: Nous avons comparé 36 sujets ayant subi un ACS (22 ACSi et 14 ACSe; âge : 47 ± 15 ans; âge au moment de l’ACS : 40 ± 14 ans; proportion d’hommes : 50 %) à 36 sujets témoins (âge : 47 ± 15 ans; proportion d’hommes : 50 %). Il n’y avait pas de différence significative quant au score UCV entre le groupe témoin et le groupe ACS (248 ± 181 UCV vs 252 ± 227 UCV; p > 0,05). Les sujets du sous-groupe ACSe avaient un score UCV moyen significativement plus faible que ceux du sous-groupe ACSi (163 ± 183 UCV vs 308 ± 237 UCV; p = 0,030). Conclusions: Les événements stressants, plus particulièrement ceux qui entraînent un stress chronique, peuvent prédisposer des personnes autrement en bonne santé aux arythmies mortelles. Une étude plus poussée du rôle du stress dans la survenue précipitée d’un ACS s’impose.

Background There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients’ platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF. Results We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%–94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, P = .03). There was no difference in emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Conclusion The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research.

Background: The Hearts in Rhythm Organization (HiRO) is a team of Canadian inherited heart rhythm and cardiomyopathy experts, genetic counsellors, nurses, researchers, patients, and families dedicated to the detection of inherited arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, provision of best therapies, and protection from the tragedy of sudden cardiac arrest. Methods: Recently, existing disease-specific registries were merged into the expanded National HiRO Registry, creating a single common data set for patients and families with inherited conditions that put them at risk for sudden death in Canada. Eligible patients are invited to participate in the registry and optional biobank from 20 specialized cardiogenetics clinics across Canada. Results: Currently, there are 4700 participants enrolled in the National HiRO Registry, with an average of 593 participants enrolled annually over the past 5 years. The capacity to enable knowledge translation of research findings is built into HiRO’s organizational infrastructure, with 3 additional working groups (HiRO Clinical Care Committee, HiRO Active Communities Committee, and HiRO Annual Symposium Committee), supporting the organization’s current goals and priorities as set alongside patient partners. Conclusion: The National HiRO Registry aims to be an integrated research platform to which researchers can pose novel research questions leading to a better understanding, detection, and clinical care of those living with inherited heart rhythm and cardiomyopathy conditions and ultimately to prevent sudden cardiac death. Résumé: Contexte: La Hearts in Rhythm Organization (HiRO) est une équipe d’experts canadiens en matière de rythmes cardiaques et de cardiomyopathies héréditaires, de conseillers en génétique, d’infirmières, de chercheurs, de patients et de familles qui se consacrent à la détection des arythmies et des cardiomyopathies héréditaires, à la mise en place des meilleures thérapies et à la protection contre la tragédie que représente une mort subite d’origine cardiaque. Méthodes: Récemment, les registres existants relatifs à des maladies spécifiques ont été fusionnés en un registre national élargi de l’HiRO, créant ainsi un ensemble de données commun unique à destination des patients et leurs familles, atteints de maladies héréditaires, qui sont à risque de mort subite au Canada. Les patients admissibles sont invités à s’associer au registre et à la biobanque facultative regroupant 20 cliniques spécialisées en cardiogénétique au Canada. Résultats: Actuellement, 4 700 participants sont inscrits au registre national de l’HiRO, avec une moyenne de 593 participants inscrits chaque année au cours des cinq dernières années. La capacité à favoriser l’application des connaissances issues de la recherche fait partie de la structure organisationnelle de l’HiRO, avec trois groupes de travail supplémentaires (comité des soins cliniques de l’HiRO, comité des communautés cctives de l’HiRO et comité du symposium annuel de l’HiRO), soutenant les objectifs et les priorités actuels de l’organisation tels qu’ils ont été fixés en partenariat avec les patients. Conclusion: Le registre national de l’HiRO vise à devenir une plateforme de recherche intégrée au sein de laquelle les chercheurs peuvent exposer des questions de recherche inédites permettant de mieux comprendre, détecter et soigner les personnes atteintes de troubles du rythme cardiaque et de cardiomyopathie héréditaires et, à terme, de prévenir la mort subite d’origine cardiaque.

Background Whereas there exists a direct relationship between glycated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease (CVD), clinical trials targeting glycated hemoglobin to near-normal levels using intensive therapy have failed to prevent CVD and have even increased mortality, making clinical decision making difficult. A common polymorphism at the haptoglobin (Hp) genetic locus is associated with CVD, especially coronary heart disease, in the setting of hyperglycemia. Objectives This study sought to determine whether the treatment difference of intensive versus standard glucose-lowering therapy on risk of CVD events in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) study depended on Hp phenotype. Methods Hp phenotype was measured within 5,806 non-Hispanic white ACCORD participants using a validated assay. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from stratified Cox regression models were used to quantify the association between intensive therapy and incident CVD for the 2 different Hp phenotype groups (Hp2-2, Hp1 carriers). Results Compared with standard therapy, intensive therapy was associated with a lower risk of incident coronary heart disease among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (n = 2,133; aHR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.91; p = 0.006), but not among the other 2 phenotypes (Hp1 allele carriers) (n = 3,673; aHR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.13; p = 0.550). The same pattern was observed for CVD. Conversely, intensive therapy was associated with an increased risk of fatal CVD (aHR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.00 to 2.25; p = 0.049) and total mortality (aHR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.81; p = 0.011) among the Hp1 carriers, whereas this risk was not increased in the Hp2-2 phenotype (fatal CVD: aHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.77; p = 0.931; total mortality: aHR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.41; p = 0.908). Conclusions Intensive glucose-lowering therapy was effective at preventing incident coronary heart disease and CVD events in ACCORD study participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype but not in Hp1 carriers, who had increased mortality risk from intensive therapy.

Research teams developing biobanks and/or genomic databases must develop policies for the disclosure and reporting of potentially actionable genomic results to research participants. Currently, a broad range of approaches to the return of results exist, with some studies opting for non-disclosure of research results while others follow clinical guidelines for the return of potentially actionable findings from sequencing. In this review, we describe current practices and highlight decisions a research team must make when designing a return of results policy, from informed consent to disclosure practices and clinical validation options. The unique challenges of returning incidental findings in cardiac genes, including reduced penetrance and the lack of clinical screening standards for phenotype-negative individuals are discussed. Lastly, the National Hearts in Rhythm Organization (HiRO) Registry approach is described to provide a rationale for the selective return of field-specific variants to those participating in disease-specific research. Our goal is to provide researchers with a resource when developing a return of results policy tailored for their research program, based on unique factors related to study design, research team composition and availability of clinical resources.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome characterized by severe structural and electrical cardiac phenotypes, including myocardial fibrofatty replacement and sudden cardiac death. Clinical management of ACM is largely palliative, owing to an absence of therapies that target its underlying pathophysiology, which stems partially from our limited insight into the condition. Following identification of deceased ACM probands possessing ANK2 rare variants and evidence of ankyrin-B loss of function on cardiac tissue analysis, an ANK2 mouse model was found to develop dramatic structural abnormalities reflective of human ACM, including biventricular dilation, reduced ejection fraction, cardiac fibrosis, and premature death. Desmosomal structure and function appeared preserved in diseased human and murine specimens in the presence of markedly abnormal beta-catenin expression and patterning, leading to identification of a previously unknown interaction between ankyrin-B and beta-catenin. A pharmacological activator of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway, SB-216763, successfully prevented and partially reversed the murine ACM phenotypes. Our findings introduce what we believe to be a new pathway for ACM, a role of ankyrin-B in cardiac structure and signaling, a molecular link between ankyrin-B and beta-catenin, and evidence for targeted activation of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway as a potential treatment for this disease. Funding Agencies|Marianne Barrie Philanthropic Fund; Canadian Institutes of Health Research [RN332805]; Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative: the Dutch Heart Foundation; Dutch Federation of University Medical Centers; Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences [CVON-PREDICT 2012-10]; Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative - Dutch Heart Foundation [CVON2012-10 PREDICT CVON2018-30 PREDICT2, CVON2015-12 eDETECT]; Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [040.11.586]; Fondation Leducq [16 CVD 02]; Dr. Francis P. Chiramonte Private Foundation; Leyla Erkan Family Fund for ARVD Research; Robin Shah ARVD Fund at Johns Hopkins; Bogle Foundation; Healing Hearts Foundation; Campanella Family; Patrick J. Harrison Family; Peter French Memorial Foundation; Wilmerding Endowments; NIH [HL135754, HL134824, HL139348, HL135096, HL114383, HL114893, HL137331, HL137325, 2UM1HG006542, UL1 TR 001079]; Ohio State Frick Center; JB Project

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated an association between appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and mortality in clinical trials. The effect of shock burden on heart failure and mortality has not been previously studied in a large population-based cohort. Methods: The cohort was derived using a comprehensive prospective ICD registry in the province of Nova Scotia with a mean follow-up of 4 ± 2.3 years. With the use of time-varying analysis, the relationship among shock burden, mortality, and heart failure hospitalization was determined. Results: A total of 776 patients (mean age of 64.8 years) were included in the study, of whom 37% received appropriate therapy during follow-up. A single ICD shock did not confer an increased mortality risk compared with no therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.79; P = 0.3), but mortality risk was significantly increased with ≥ 2 shocks (HR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.04-5.09; P < 0.0001). There was a significant increase in heart failure hospitalization associated with receiving 1 ICD shock (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.46-2.89; P < 0.0001) or more than 1 ICD shock (HR, 4.36; CI, 2.53-7.52; P < 0.0001) compared with patients receiving no ICD therapy. Patients who received antitachycardia pacing alone showed no difference in heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.93; CI, 0.67-1.29; P = 0.7) and improved survival (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.5-0.96; P = 0.03) compared with those receiving no ICD therapy. Conclusion: Ventricular arrhythmia treated with appropriate ICD shocks is associated with an increased risk of heart failure hospitalization, whereas recurrent episodes of ventricular arrhythmia requiring shocks are associated with both higher mortality and higher heart failure hospitalization rates. Résumé: Contexte: Des études menées antérieurement ont révélé l’existence d’un lien entre l’administration appropriée de décharges électriques au moyen d’un défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI) et la mortalité au cours des essais cliniques. L’effet de telles décharges sur l’insuffisance cardiaque et la mortalité n’avait encore jamais été étudié au sein d’une cohorte d’envergure représentative de la population. Méthodologie: La cohorte a été établie au moyen d’un registre prospectif exhaustif des DCI implantés chez des patients de la Nouvelle-Écosse ayant fait l’objet d’un suivi moyen de 4 ± 2,3 ans. La relation entre le fardeau imposé par les décharges, la mortalité et l’hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque a été déterminée au moyen d’une analyse en fonction du temps. Résultats: Au total, 776 patients (âge moyen : 64,8 ans) ont été admis dans l’étude; 37 % d’entre eux avaient reçu un traitement approprié au cours de la période de suivi. Une seule décharge délivrée par un DCI n’augmentait pas le risque de mortalité par rapport à l’absence de traitement (rapport des risques instantanés [RRI] de 1,23; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, de 0,84 à 1,79; p = 0,3), mais le risque de mortalité était significativement accru chez les patients ayant reçu ≥ 2 décharges (RRI de 3,23; IC à 95 %, de 2,04 à 5,09; p < 0,0001). Le risque d’hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque s’est révélé significativement supérieur chez les sujets ayant reçu 1 décharge par DCI (RRI de 2,05; IC à 95 %, de 1,46 à 2,89; p < 0,0001) ou plus de 1 décharge par DCI (RRI de 4,36; IC à 95 %, de 2,53-7,52; p < 0,0001), comparativement à ceux n’ayant reçu aucun traitement par DCI. On n’a observé aucune différence quant à l’hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque (RRI de 0,93; IC à 95 %, de 0,67 à 1,29; p = 0,7) et à l’amélioration de la survie (RRI de 0,69; IC à 95 %, de 0,5 à 0,96; p = 0,03) chez les patients qui ont reçu uniquement une stimulation antitachycardie comparativement à ceux qui n’ont reçu aucun traitement par DCI. Conclusion: L’arythmie ventriculaire traitée de façon appropriée au moyen de décharges électriques délivrées par un DCI est associée à un risque accru d’hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque, tandis que des épisodes récurrents d’arythmie ventriculaire exigeant un traitement par décharge électrique sont associés à des taux supérieurs de mortalité et d’hospitalisation pour insuffisance cardiaque.

Background: Following an unexplained cardiac arrest, clinical genetic testing is increasingly becoming standard of care. Periodic review of variant classification is required, as reinterpretation can change the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients and their relatives. Methods: This study aimed to develop and validate a standardized algorithm to facilitate clinical application of the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines for the interpretation of genetic variants. The algorithm was applied to genetic results in the Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry, to assess the rate of variant reclassification over time. Variant classifications were then compared with the classifications of 2 commercial laboratories to determine the rate and identify sources of variant interpretation discordance. Results: Thirty-one percent of participants (40 of 131) had at least 1 genetic variant with a clinically significant reclassification over time. Variants of uncertain significance were more likely to be downgraded (73%) to benign than upgraded to pathogenic (27%; P =0.03). For the second part of the study, 50% (70 of 139) of variants had discrepant interpretations (excluding benign variants), provided by at least 1 team. Conclusions: Periodic review of genetic variant classification is a key component of follow-up care given rapidly changing information in the field. There is potential for clinical care gaps with discrepant variant interpretations, based on the interpretation and application of current guidelines. The development of gene- and disease-specific guidelines and algorithms may provide an opportunity to further standardize variant interpretation reporting in the future. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

Aims The term idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) describes survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) without a specific diagnosis after clinical and genetic testing. Previous reports have described a subset of IVF individuals with ventricular arrhythmia initiated by short-coupled trigger premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) for which the term short-coupled ventricular fibrillation (SCVF) has been proposed. The aim of this article is to establish the phenotype and frequency of SCVF in a large cohort of UCA survivors. Methods and results We performed a multicentre study including consecutive UCA survivors from the CASPER registry. Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation was defined as otherwise unexplained ventricular fibrillation initiated by a trigger PVC with a coupling interval of Conclusion Short-coupled ventricular fibrillation is a distinct primary arrhythmia syndrome accounting for at least 6.6% of UCA. As documentation of ventricular fibrillation onset is necessary for the diagnosis, most cases are diagnosed at the time of recurrent arrhythmia, thus the true prevalence of SCVF remains still unknown. Quinidine is effective in SCVF and should be considered as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent episodes.

Background SCN5A gene mutations are associated with diverse clinical phenotypes including Long QT (LQT) Syndrome, Brugada Syndrome, progressive conduction system disease and cardiomyopathy. Objective We identified a novel SCN5A variant (T731I) in a pedigree affected by QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmia. Clinical phenotype and co-segregation with genotype within the pedigree were characterized. Methods Family members were invited to attend clinics held in their indigenous community. All subjects underwent a history, physical exam, 12 lead ECG and had blood samples collected for genetic testing. Patients were assessed by an adult or pediatric cardiologist and genetic counselors over a six year period. There were 86 females and 69 males ranging in age from 1 to 82 years (mean 36 years) at the time of first assessment. ECG analysis was performed by a cardiac electrophysiologist blinded to patient identity and genotype. The QTc was calculated using Bazett's formula. Results One hundred and fifty five family members were evaluated (86 (55%) female; mean age 36 years (range 1 to 82 years). Mean QTc was 461 + 21 ms for the gene positive group and 419 + 22 ms for the gene negative group (P Gene positive family members were also noted to have low right atrial p waves and frequent unifocal ventricular ectopy and non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. One gene positive individual developed dilated cardiomyopathy with high burden ventricular tachycardia and required cardiac transplantation. Conclusion This novel SCN5A variant co-segregated with an abnormal phenotype consisting of significant QTc prolongation, low atrial rhythm, and ventricular arrhythmia. This pedigree highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity of SCN5A gene mutations and the importance of cascade family screening to identify at risk family members. Figure 1. QTc intervals Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Introduction In patients with ischemic heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to high dose amiodarone, the two most common therapeutic options are adjunctive mexiletine therapy or catheter ablation. There are little existing data on the efficacy of these strategies. We examined the relative efficacy of adjunctive mexiletine and catheter ablation among patients enrolled in the VANISH trial. Methods All subjects enrolled in the VANISH trial who had VT refractory to high dose (≥ 300 mg daily) amiodarone at baseline were included. Per protocol, subjects randomized to escalated drug therapy received adjunctive mexiletine. Results Nineteen of the 259 patients were receiving high-dose amiodarone at baseline and 11 were randomized to escalated therapy with mexiletine and 8 to ablation. The adjunctive mexiletine group had a higher rate of the primary composite outcome (death, VT storm, or appropriate shock) in comparison to catheter ablation (HR 6.87 [2.08-22.8]). Over 90% of the patients in the adjunctive mexiletine/group experienced a primary endpoint during a median 9.2 months' follow-up. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions Mexiletine has limited efficacy in the treatment of recurrent VT despite high-dose amiodarone therapy, in patients with ischemic heart disease. Catheter ablation is a superior strategy in this population.

Objectives This study investigated the benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator replacement in patients who did not have an ongoing theoretical indication for ICD therapy at time of replacement. Background Primary prevention ICD therapy is known to reduce mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy and reduced left ventricular systolic function. The data describing outcomes after generator replacement are limited. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study following patients implanted with primary prevention ICD therapy from 2002 until 2015 who subsequently received a generator replacement. Patients with an ongoing theoretical indication for ICD therapy were defined as either left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or having had prior appropriate ICD therapy. Outcomes were mortality, appropriate ICD therapy and shock, inappropriate shock, and device and lead complications. Results A total of 614 patients were identified; 173 (28.2%) underwent a generator replacement and were followed for a mean of 2.9 years after replacement; 144 (83.2%) had an ongoing theoretical indication. Patients with no ongoing theoretical indication (n = 29, 16.7%) had lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-1.00, p = 0.0495), appropriate shock rate (HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.96, p = 0.04), and appropriate ICD therapy rate (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.77, p = 0.012) when compared with patients with ongoing theoretical indication. In the entire cohort, there were low rates of inappropriate shock (4.0%), device complication (5.1%), and lead complication (2.3%). Conclusions In patients with primary prevention ICD therapy who underwent generator replacement, improved left ventricular ejection fraction and lack of prior appropriate ICD therapy at time of replacement were associated with a lower risk of mortality and incident ventricular arrhythmia.

Post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and population-based studies have shown no difference in mortality between men and women, but often show that men are more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy. We utilized a population-based registry to investigate the interaction of sex and age and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in an ICD population.A total of 776 consecutive patients receiving an ICD for primary or secondary prevention in a provincial ICD registry were studied. No significant mortality difference was found between men and women (27.5% versus 23.7%, p=0.39). Overall, men were more likely to receive appropriate ICD therapy compared to women (39.3% versus 26.7%, p=0.006). The hazard ratio for appropriate therapy in men vs. women60years of age was 3.22, CI 95% (1.56-6.65), p=0.002, and the same comparison in men vs. women over the age of 60 showed no significant difference (HR 1.11, CI 95% [0.74-1.65], p=0.61). This interaction between age and sex remained significant when adjusted for New York Heart Associated Class, ejection fraction, coronary artery disease and indication for ICD (p=0.02).This study demonstrates that the risk of appropriate ICD therapy increases as women are older, reaching similar risk as men in that age group. Further study of the mechanism of the interaction of age and sex as they modulate the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia may be warranted.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have shown benefit in reducing mortality in patients with heart failure, after myocardial infarction, and those with reduced ejection fraction. We sought to explore the use of this therapy in specialized heart function clinics, in rural and urban locations.This was a retrospective cohort study performed in 3 specialized heart function clinics in Nova Scotia, 2 of which were in rural locations. All patients with an initial left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% were included from 2006 to 2011. Rates of referral, ICD implantation, and mortality were compared between urban and rural groups.There were 922 patients included in the study; 636 patients in the urban clinic, 286 in the rural locations. Referral rates were higher in the urban clinic compared with the rural locations (80.4% vs 68.3%; P = 0.024). Refusal rates for referral were higher in the rural locations (13.7% vs 2.1%; P0.0001). Higher referral rates were associated with urban location (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.26; P = 0.047), and younger age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = 0.003); lower referral rates for women was observed (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.13-4.63; P = 0.021). Mortality was significantly associated with older age, lack of referral, presence of comorbidities (renal failure, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease) and a rural location.Specialized heart function clinics have a high rate of appropriate referral for primary prevention ICDs, but referral rates for this life-saving therapy remain lower in rural jurisdictions. This disparity in access to care is associated with increased mortality and might require particular attention to prevent unnecessary deaths.

OBJECTIVES: The authors studied the response rates and relative sensitivity of the most common agents used in the sodium-channel blocker (SCB) challenge. BACKGROUND: A type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern precipitated by an SCB challenge confers a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. METHODS: Patients undergoing an SCB challenge were prospectively enrolled across Canada and the United Kingdom. Patients with no prior cardiac arrest and family histories of sudden cardiac death or Brugada syndrome were included. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five subjects underwent SCB challenge (ajmaline, n = 331 [78%]; procainamide, n = 94 [22%]), with a mean age of 39 ± 15 years (54% men). Baseline non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation was present in 10%. A total of 154 patients (36%) underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography, with 41% having late potentials. Positive results were seen more often with ajmaline than procainamide infusion (26% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, baseline non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.15 to 15.2; p < 0.001) and ajmaline use (OR: 8.76; 95% CI: 2.62 to 29.2; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of positive results to SCB challenge. In the subgroup undergoing signal-averaged electrocardiography, non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation (OR: 9.28; 95% CI: 2.22 to 38.8; p = 0.002), late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 1.50 to 12.5; p = 0.007), and ajmaline use (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 2.45 to 59.1; p = 0.002) were strong predictors of SCB outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of SCB challenge was significantly affected by the drug used, with ajmaline more likely to provoke a type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern compared with procainamide. Patients undergoing SCB challenge may have contrasting results depending on the drug used, with potential clinical, psychosocial, and socioeconomic implications.

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a progressive disease characterized by replacement of normal myocardium by fibrofatty tissue. The right ventricular (RV) apex is the typical target for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead placement, raising concerns for suboptimal lead performance in medium- to long-term follow-up. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether placement of ICD leads at the RV apex was associated with performance deterioration of medium-term leads in ARVC patients compared to non-ARVC patients. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective, case-control study, ICD lead performance measures of R-wave, impedance, and pacing thresholds were compared at baseline and between 1-year and 5-year postimplantation follow-up using mixed-effect models adjusted for age and sex. Results One hundred one ARVC patients (49 women, age 50.6 ± 14.5 years) were compared to 56 control patients (37 women, age 48.2 ± 14.2 years). The mean difference in R wave between years 1 and 2 was –0.85 mV ( P = .16) compared to a mean difference at years 5 and 6 of –1.85 mV ( P = .02). There was no difference in impedance or pacing threshold or in lead lifetime between the 2 groups over 6-year follow-up (5.91 ± 3.89 years vs 5.48 ± 3.70 years, P = .239). Conclusion In ARVC patients with ICD leads implanted in the RV apex, ventricular sensing deteriorates significantly during medium-term follow-up. Septal RV lead placement should be explored as the first choice at implantation.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly used in the Canadian population, because of expanding indications and an aging population. Device-related complications are a source of morbidity and mortality. There is currently no comprehensive monitoring strategy of CIED-related complications in Canada. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of administrative data in tracking CIED complications. This was a retrospective observational study in patients with newly implanted pacemakers, pacemaker system revisions, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) from 2011 to 2014. The study was performed at a single academic centre in Nova Scotia. A comprehensive chart review was used as the gold standard for device-related complications. This was compared with the reporting of complications identified in the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System Database (NACRS). Sensitivity and specificity of Canadian Institute for Health Information/NACRS was reported. There were 1327 patients included in the study (742 pacemakers, 585 ICDs). The rate of complications in the pacemaker population was 8.0%; the sensitivity of Discharge Abstract Database/NACRS for detection of these was 83.1%, and specificity 100%. The rate of complications in the ICD population was 12.0%, with a sensitivity of 92.1%, and specificity 100%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% in the pacemaker population, and 0.3% in the ICD population. This study provides feasibility for use of administrative data for detection of device-related complications, showing reasonable sensitivity and excellent specificity. Further work to determine generalizability of these data across Canada is required to ensure accurate monitoring of device-related complications.

Objectives This study explored early repolarization (ER) pattern inheritance between survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) and their first-degree relatives. Background ER is considered a factor that confers an increased risk of sudden death. A monogenic explanation for ER is seldom evident after cascade screening. Methods UCA survivors and their first-degree relatives enrolled in the CASPER (Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry) were included in the study. ER was defined and characterized according to accepted criteria. Logistic regression was performed to explore the association between ER status in the UCA survivor and first-degree relative groups based on the presence of an ER pattern in their related family members after adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity. Results A total of 289 patients from 14 Canadian sites were studied (age: 43.0 ± 15.9 years; 148 women), and 945 electrocardiograms were analyzed. Seventy-five patients had the ER pattern. There was a significantly higher prevalence of the ER pattern in UCA survivors who had first-degree relatives with the ER pattern (adjusted odds ratio: 5.79; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.79 to 18.7). There was also a nonsignificant higher prevalence of the ER pattern in first-degree relatives of UCA survivors with the ER pattern (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 0.70 to 8.43). The highest prevalence of the ER pattern was seen in first-degree relatives of UCA survivors with ER syndrome (29%). Conclusions The ER pattern appeared to be more common among UCA survivors and first-degree relatives whose related family members had similar changes on electrocardiography, which suggested that genetically complex factors contribute to electrocardiographic patterns that predispose to cardiac arrest.

Background— Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be limited by intramural substrate not amenable to endocardial or epicardial ablation. Feasibility of irrigated needle ablation has been shown, but optimal means of identifying targets is not clear. We analyzed intramural needle electrograms in relation to endocardial electrograms. Methods and Results— Eight sequential patients (mean age, 56 years) who had failed 1 to 4 prior ablations underwent irrigated needle ablation were included. At selected sites, the needle was advanced into the myocardium. Bipolar and unipolar electrograms from the needle and catheter tip were analyzed. The needle was deployed at 75 sites with suspected intramural substrate among 2309 mapping sites. Intramural bipolar electrogram amplitude and duration correlated closely with endocardial electrograms, but were greater in amplitude and duration (1.5±1.4 versus 0.6±0.5 mV and 131±66 versus 112±51 ms; P =0.001 for both). During sinus rhythm intramural late potentials tended to be more common than endocardial late potentials (53.6% versus 35.7%; P =0.12). Intramural electrograms during VA preceded endocardial electrograms (−29±34 versus −15±21 ms; P =0.001). Irrigated needle ablation terminated VA at 12 of 28 sites with ablation during VA. Termination site needle electrograms tended to be earlier than nontermination sites (−54±37 versus −36±33 ms pre-QRS; P =0.15). Pacemapping from the needle at 19 sites matched the VA at 18 and showed stimulus to QRS of 60±51 ms. Conclusions— Recordings from intramural needle may be useful for selecting ablation targets during ventricular tachycardia and for substrate mapping. Further study is needed to develop methods to guide selection of optimal sites for needle deployment and ablation.

Background— J-wave ECG patterns are associated with an increased risk of sudden arrhythmic death, and experimental evidence supports a transient outward current (I to )-mediated mechanism of J-wave formation. This study aimed to determine the frequency of genetic mutations in genes encoding the I to in patients with J waves on ECG. Methods and Results— Comprehensive mutational analysis was performed on I to -encoding KCNA4 , KCND2 , and KCND3 genes, as well as the previously described J-wave–associated KCNJ8 gene, in 51 unrelated patients with ECG evidence defining a J-wave syndrome. Only patients with a resuscitated cardiac arrest or type 1 Brugada ECG pattern were included for analysis. A rare genetic mutation of the KCND2 gene, p.D612N, was identified in a single patient. Co-expression of mutant and wild-type KCND2 with KChIP2 in HEK293 cells demonstrated a gain-of-function phenotype, including an increase in peak I to density of 48% ( P to resulted in loss of the epicardial action potential dome, predicting an increased ventricular transmural I to gradient. The previously described KCNJ8 -S422L mutation was not identified in this cohort of patients with ECG evidence of J-wave syndrome. Conclusions— These findings are the first to implicate the KCND2 gene as a novel cause of J-wave syndrome associated with sudden cardiac arrest. However, genetic defects in I to -encoding genes seem to be an uncommon cause of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with apparent J-wave syndromes.

This analysis uses the data from the randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of catheter ablation (n = 132) versus escalated antiarrhythmic therapy (n = 127).For survivors of myocardial infarction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks despite antiarrhythmic drugs, the VANISH (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease) trial demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with catheter ablation compared with more aggressive antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy.Health care resource use and quality-of-life data were used to determine the cost effectiveness of catheter ablation. Published references were used to estimate costs (in 2015 Canadian dollars). The analysis was over 3 years, with a 5% discount rate. Adjustment was made for censoring and baseline utilities.Ablation resulted in greater quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than escalated drug therapy did (1.63 vs. 1.49; difference: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.20 to 0.46) and higher cost ($65,126 vs. $60,269; difference: $4,857; 95% CI: -$19,757 to $27,106); with an incremental cost per QALY gained for ablation versus escalated drug therapy of $34,057 primarily due to the initial costs of ablation, which were partially offset by the costs of subsequent ablations and adverse outcomes in the escalated drug therapy arm. For patients with amiodarone-refractory ventricular tachycardia, ablation dominated escalated drug therapy, with greater QALYs (1.48 vs. 1.26; difference: 0.22; 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.59) and lower costs ($67,614 vs. $68,383; difference: -$769; 95% CI: -$35,330 to $27,092). For those with sotalol-refractory ventricular tachycardia, ablation resulted in similar QALYs (1.90 vs. 1.90; difference: -0.00; 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.62) and higher costs ($60,455 vs. $45,033; difference: $15,422; 95% CI: -$10,968 to $48,555).For the total trial population, results are suggestive that ablation is cost effective compared with escalation of drug therapy. This result was only manifest for the subgroup of patients whose qualifying arrhythmia occurred despite amiodarone.

Background— Unexplained cardiac arrest may be because of an inherited arrhythmia syndrome. The role of genetic testing in cardiac arrest survivors without a definite clinical phenotype is unclear. Methods and Results— The CASPER (Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry) is a large registry of cardiac arrest survivors where initial assessment reveals normal coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and resting ECG. Of 375 cardiac arrest survivors in CASPER from 2006 to 2015, 174 underwent genetic testing. Patients were classified as phenotype-positive (n=72) or phenotype-negative (n=102). Genetic testing was performed at treating physicians’ discretion in line with contemporary guidelines and availability. All genetic variants identified from original laboratory reports were reassessed by the investigators in line with modern criteria. Pathogenic variants were identified in 29 (17%) patients (60% channelopathy-associated and 40% cardiomyopathy-associated genes) and 70 variants of unknown significance were identified in 32 (18%) patients. Prior syncope (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–9.7) and a family history of sudden death (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–9.4) were independently associated with the presence of a pathogenic variant. In phenotype-negative patients, broad multiphenotype genetic testing led to higher yields (21% versus 8%; P =0.04) but was associated with more variants of unknown significance (55% versus 5%; P Conclusions— Genetic testing identifies a pathogenic variant in a significant proportion of unexplained cardiac arrest survivors. Prior syncope and family history of sudden death are predictors of a positive genetic test. Both arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy genes are implicated. Broad, multiphenotype testing revealed the highest frequency of pathogenic variants in phenotype-negative patients. Clinical Trial Registration— https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT00292032

Background— The RAFT (Resynchronization in Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial) demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduced both mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with functional class II or III heart failure and widened QRS. We examined the influence of CRT on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary versus secondary prophylaxis defibrillator indications. Methods and Results— All ventricular arrhythmias among RAFT study participants were downloaded and adjudicated by 2 blinded reviewers with an overreader for disagreements and committee review for remaining discrepancies. Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias among patients randomized to CRT-D versus implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were compared within the groups of patients treated for primary prophylaxis and for secondary prophylaxis. Of 1798 enrolled patients, 1764 had data available for adjudication and were included. Of these, 1531 patients were implanted for primary prophylaxis, while 233 patients were implanted for secondary prophylaxis; 884 patients were randomized to ICD and 880 to CRT-D. During 5953.6 patient-years of follow-up, there were 11 278 appropriate ICD detections of ventricular arrhythmias. In the primary prophylaxis group, CRT-D significantly reduced incidence ventricular arrhythmias in comparison to ICD (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.99; P =0.044). This effect was not seen in the secondary prophylaxis group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–1.58; P =0.45). CRT-D was not associated with significant differences in overall ventricular arrhythmia burden in either group. Conclusions— CRT reduced the rate of onset of new ventricular arrhythmias detected by ICDs in patients without a history of prior ventricular arrhythmias. This effect was not observed among patients who had prior ventricular arrhythmias. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Background A systematic evaluation of patients with unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) yields a diagnosis in 50% of the cases. However, evolution of clinical phenotype, identification of new disease-causing mutations, and description of new syndromes may revise the diagnosis. Objective To assess the evolution in diagnosis among patients with initially UCA. Methods Diagnoses were reviewed for all patients with UCA recruited from the Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry with at least 1 year of follow-up. Results After comprehensive investigation of 68 patients (age 45.2 ± 14.9 years; 63% men), the initial diagnosis was as follows: idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n = 34 [50%]), a primary arrhythmic disorder (n = 21 [31%]), and an occult structural cause (n = 13 [19%]). Patients were followed for 30 ± 17 months, during which time the diagnosis changed in 12 (18%) patients. A specific diagnosis emerged for 7 patients (21%) with an initial diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. A structural cardiomyopathy evolved in 2 patients with an initial diagnosis of primary electrical disorder, while the specific structural cardiomyopathy was revised for 1 patient. Two patients with an initial diagnosis of a primary arrhythmic disorder were subsequently considered to have a different primary arrhythmic disorder. A follow-up resting electrocardiogram was the test that most frequently changed the diagnosis (67% of the cases), followed by genetic testing (17%). Conclusions The reevaluation of patients presenting with UCA may lead to a change in diagnosis in up to 20%. This emphasizes the need to actively monitor the phenotype and also has implications for the treatment of these patients and the screening of their relatives.

Canadian electrophysiology (EP) fellowship programs have evolved in an ad hoc fashion over 30 years. This evolution has occurred in many fields in medicine and is natural when innovators and pioneers attract research fellows who help change the status quo from predominantly research to a predominantly clinical application and focus. Fellows not only push their supervisors and their centres into new areas of inquiry but also function at the most advanced level to encourage and teach junior trainees and to provide examples of excellence to residents, medical students, and other health professionals. Funding for fellows has never been provided in the traditional way through the Ministry of Health or the Ministry of Advanced Education. Each Canadian centre has over the years found novel ways to fund fellowship programs, and many centres have used value-adds from procurement programs. These sources of funding are eroding as provincial government agencies are beginning to assume procurement responsibilities and local flexibility to fund fellowships is lost. In particular, provincial government agencies feel that valuable financial resources should be restricted to Canadian trainees only, despite the international consensus that fellowship is an essential time for advanced trainees to travel abroad to acquire a broad a range of experience, learn new techniques and approaches, make lifelong research connections, and hopefully return home with these skills and expertise. This article summarizes the long history of EP fellowship training in Canada, as well as EP fellowship experiences at home and abroad by Canadian electrophysiologists, in an attempt to contextualize these new realities.

Background— Unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) may be explained by inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry prospectively assessed first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims to screen for cardiac abnormalities. Methods and Results— Around 398 first-degree family members (186 UCA, 212 sudden unexplained death victims’ relatives; mean age, 44±17 years) underwent extensive cardiac workup, including ECG, signal averaged ECG, exercise testing, cardiac imaging, Holter-monitoring, and selective provocative drug testing with epinephrine or procainamide. Genetic testing was performed when a mutation was identified in the UCA survivor or when the diagnostic workup revealed a phenotype suggestive of a specific inherited arrhythmia syndrome. The diagnostic strength was classified as definite, probable, or possible based on previously published definitions. Cardiac abnormalities were detected in 120 of 398 patients (30.2%) with 67 of 398 having a definite or probable diagnosis (17%), including Long-QT syndrome (13%), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (4%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (4%), and Brugada syndrome (3%). The detection yield was similar for family members of UCA and sudden unexplained death victims (31% versus 27%; P =0.59). Genetic testing was performed more often in family members of UCA patients (29% versus 20%; P =0.03). Disease-causing mutations were identified in 20 of 398 relatives (5%). The most common pathogenic mutations were RyR2 (2%), SCN5A (1%), and KNCQ1 (0.8%). Conclusions— Cardiac screening revealed abnormalities in 30% of first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims, with a clear working diagnosis in 17%. Long-QT, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were the most common diagnoses. Systematic cascade screening and genetic testing in asymptomatic individuals will lead to preventive lifestyle and medical interventions with potential to prevent sudden cardiac death. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

We would like to thank Professors Jaimez and Sanchez for their letter of response commenting on our recent summary of evaluation and outcome of our first 200 unexplained cardiac arrest probands.1 We would first like to point out that we excluded patients with a manifest diagnosis, so none of these patients had overt evidence of an ion channelopathy or cardiomyopathy that are typically both readily diagnosed and treated. This is reflected in our empirical strength of diagnosis framework, which is necessary when a classic diagnosis is not forthcoming.2 In addition, registries do not mandate care but rather capture it, and reflect the reality of practice with the vagaries of contextual clinical decision making. In response to the concerns about the incidence of shocks and the inefficacy of medical therapy, it is important to point out the difference between efficacy and effectiveness. Without …

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a complex and clinically heterogeneous arrhythmic condition. Incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity are particularly evident in ARVC, making clinical decision-making challenging. Methods Pediatric and adult cardiologists, geneticists, genetic counsellors, ethicists, nurses, and qualitative researchers are collaborating to create the Canadian ARVC registry using a web-based clinical database. Biological samples will be banked and systematic analysis will be performed to examine potentially causative mutations, variants, and biomarkers. Outcomes will include syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, defibrillator therapies, heart failure, and mortality. Results Preliminary recruitment has enrolled 365 participants (aged 42.7 ± 17.1 years; 50% women), including 129 probands and 236 family members. Previous cardiac arrest occurred in 28 (8%) participants, syncope occurred in 43 (12%) participants, and 46% of probands had a family history of sudden death. Overall yield of genetic testing was 36% for a disease-causing mutation and 20% for a variant of unknown significance. Target enrollment is 1000 affected patients and 500 unaffected family member controls over 7 years. The cross-sectional and longitudinal data collected in this manner will allow a robust assessment of the natural history and clinical course of genetic subtypes. Conclusions The Canadian ARVC Registry will create a population-based cohort of patients and their families to inform clinical decisions regarding patients with ARVC.

Background Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia resulting in mortality and morbidity. Gaps in oral anticoagulation and education of patients regarding AF have been identified as areas that require improvement. Methods and Results A before‐and‐after study of 433 patients with newly diagnosed AF in the 3 emergency departments in Nova Scotia from January 1, 2011 until January 31, 2014 was performed. The “before” phase underwent the usual‐care pathway for AF management; the “after” phase was enrolled in a nurse‐run, physician‐supervised AF clinic. The primary outcome was a composite of death, cardiovascular hospitalization, and AF ‐related emergency department visits. A propensity analysis was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Results A total of 185 patients were enrolled into the usual‐care group, and 228 patients were enrolled in the AF clinic group. The mean age was 64±15 years and 44% were women. In a propensity‐matched analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 44 (26.2%) patients in the usual‐care group and 29 (17.3%) patients in the AF clinic group (odds ratio 0.71; 95% CI [0.59, 1]; P =0.049) at 12 months. Prescription of oral anticoagulation was increased in the CHADS 2 ≥2 group (88.4% in the AF clinic versus 58.5% in the usual‐care group, P Conclusions Adoption of this integrated management approach for the burgeoning population of AF may provide an overall benefit to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Background— The Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER) enrolls patients with apparently unexplained cardiac arrest and no evident cardiac disease to identify the pathogenesis of cardiac arrest through systematic clinical testing. Exercise testing, drug provocation, advanced cardiac imaging, and genetic testing may be useful when a cause is not apparent. Methods and Results— The first 200 survivors of unexplained cardiac arrest from 14 centers across Canada were evaluated to determine the results of investigation and follow-up (age, 48.6±14.7 years, 41% female). Patients were free of evidence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, or evident repolarization syndromes. Advanced testing determined a diagnosis in 34% of patients at baseline, with a diagnosis emerging during follow-up in 7% of patients. Of those who were diagnosed, 28 (35%) had an underlying structural condition and 53 (65%) had a primary electric disease. During a mean follow-up of 3.15±2.34 years, 23% of patients had either a shock or an appropriate antitachycardia pacing from their implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or both. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator appropriate intervention rate was 8.4% at 1 year and 18.1% at 3 years, with no clear difference between diagnosed and undiagnosed subjects, or between those diagnosed with a primary electric versus structural pathogenesis. Conclusions— Obtaining a diagnosis in previously unexplained cardiac arrest patients requires systematic clinical testing and regular follow-up to unmask the cause. Nearly half of apparently unexplained cardiac arrest patients ultimately received a diagnosis, allowing for improved treatment and family screening. A substantial proportion of patients received appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy during medium-term follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

Background— Underuse of implantable defibrillators has been previously noted in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, as well as for survivors of sudden cardiac death. We sought to determine the utilization rates in a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)–eligible population and mortality in this group compared with a group that had undergone implantation of this therapy. Methods and Results— A retrospective cohort of patients from April 1, 2006, to December 31, 2009, was used to define a primary prevention ICD-eligible population. Two groups were compared on the basis of ICD implantation (no-ICD versus ICD). The primary outcome measure was mortality. Of the 717 patients found to be potentially eligible for a primary prevention ICD, 116 (16%) were referred. The remaining cohort of 601 patients were compared with an existing cohort of primary prevention ICD patients (n=290). A significant survival benefit was associated with primary prevention ICD implantation (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI [0.33–0.64]; P P =0.01). Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 26% of those in the ICD group, during a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. Conclusions— A significant mortality benefit was observed for patients who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation compared with those who did not. Vigilance is required to ensure that patients eligible for primary prevention ICDs are appropriately referred and assessed to allow such patients to benefit from this life-saving therapy.

Objectives We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of early repolarization in patients in CASPER (Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry). Background Early repolarization has been implicated in a syndrome of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in patients without organic heart disease. Methods One hundred patients with apparently unexplained cardiac arrest and preserved ejection fraction underwent extensive clinical and genetic testing to unmask subclinical electrical or structural disease. A blinded independent analysis of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed. Early repolarization was defined as ≥0.1 mV QRS-ST junction (J-point) elevation with terminal QRS slurring or notching in at least 2 contiguous inferior and/or lateral leads. Results One hundred cardiac arrest patients were enrolled (40 females, age 43 ± 14 years). Forty-four were diagnosed with an established cause for cardiac arrest. Significant early repolarization was found in 19 patients, including 6 with a primary diagnosis that explained their cardiac arrest (14%), compared with 23% of the 56 patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) (p = 0.23). J-point elevation in IVF patients had higher amplitude (0.25 ± 0.11 mV vs. 0.13 ± 0.05 mV, p = 0.02) and wider distribution (4.3 ± 1.3 leads vs. 2.8 ± 0.8 leads; p = 0.01) than those with an established cause of cardiac arrest. J-wave amplitude was fluctuant on serial ECGs; at least 1 ECG failed to demonstrate early repolarization in 58% of patients. Conclusions Early repolarization is present in a significant proportion of causally diagnosed and idiopathic VF. It is often intermittent and more pronounced in IVF patients. (Registry of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest; NCT00292032).

Background: Entrainment from the right ventricular (RV) apex and the base has been used to distinguish atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The difference in the entrainment response from the RV apex in comparison with the RV base has not been tested. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included. Entrainment of SVT was performed from the RV apex and base, pacing at 10–40-ms faster than the tachycardia cycle length. SA interval was calculated from stimulus to earliest atrial electrogram. Ventricle to atrium (VA) interval was measured from the RV electrogram (apex and base) to the earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia. The SA-VA interval from apex and base was measured and the difference between them was calculated. Results: Thirty-six AVNRT and 23 AVRT patients were enrolled. Mean age was 44 ± 12 years; 52% were male. The [SA-VA]apex–[SA-VA]base was demonstrable in 84.7% of patients and measured −9.4 ± 6.6 in AVNRT and 10 ± 11.3 in AVRT, P < 0.001. The difference was negative for all AVNRT cases and positive for all septal accessory pathways (APs). Conclusion: The difference between entrainment from the apex and base is readily performed and is diagnostic for all AVNRTs and septal APs. (PACE 2010; 1335–1341)

Objectives This study was designed to assess the prognostic significance of hyperglycemia in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the thrombolytic era using contemporary criteria for hyperglycemia. Background Most studies that have examined this issue were performed before the widespread use of disease-modifying therapies and varied in their definition of hyperglycemia, assessment of risk factors, and reported outcomes. Methods There were 1,664 consecutively hospitalized patients with AMI between October 1997 and October 1998 from a disease-specific, population-based registry. Patients were stratified according to history of diabetes mellitus and, further, according to whether they had a blood glucose >198 mg/dl (11 mmol/l). The influences of cardiac risk factors, medications, and interventions were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the influence of blood glucose on mortality. Results In patients without a history of diabetes, glucose levels were ≤198 mg/dl in 1,078 patients (Group 1) and >198 mg/dl in 135 (Group 2). Of those with diabetes, glucose levels were ≤198 mg/dl in 169 patients (Group 3) and >198 mg/dl in 282 (Group 4). Compared with Group 1 patients, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for in-hospital mortality among those in Groups 2, 3, and 4 were 2.44 (1.42 to 4.20; p = 0.001), 1.87 (1.05 to 3.34; p = 0.035), and 1.91 (1.16 to 3.14; p = 0.011), respectively. These groups also had greater 12-month mortality. Conclusions Hyperglycemia in AMI is associated with poor outcome even among patients without known diabetes. This finding underlines the need for aggressive glucose management in this setting and may support a more vigorous screening strategy for early recognition of diabetes.

The circadian variation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) was studied in 67 patients who received a dual-chamber pacemaker 3 months before a planned atrioventricular node ablation. A distinct circadian variation of AF was observed with 2 time peaks in initiation (1 in the early morning and 1 in the early evening hours), which was modulated by atrial pacing, the duration of AF, and the use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents.

Background —Some clinical data suggest that atrial-based pacing prevents paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). This study tested the hypothesis that DDDR pacing compared with VDD pacing prevents AF after atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation. Methods and Results —Patients were randomized to DDDR pacing (n=33) or to VDD pacing (n=34) after AV junction ablation and followed every 2 months for 6 months. Patients then crossed over to the alternate pacing mode and were followed for an additional 6 months. Primary analysis included the time to first recurrence of sustained AF (duration >5 minutes), total AF burden, and the development of permanent AF. The time to first episode of AF was similar in the DDDR group (0.37 days, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.3 days) and the VDD pacing group (0.5 days, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.7 days, P =NS). AF burden increased over time in both groups ( P P =NS). Twelve (35%) patients in the DDDR group and 11 (32%) patients in the VDD group had permanent AF within 6 months of ablation. Within 1 year of follow-up, 43% of patients had permanent AF. Conclusions —DDDR pacing compared with VDD pacing does not prevent paroxysmal AF over the long term in patients in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after total AV junction ablation. Many patients have permanent AF within the first year after ablation.

Background —Patients with resuscitated ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) compared with medical therapy. We hypothesized that the patients who benefit most from an ICD are those at greatest risk of death. Methods and Results —In the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), 659 patients with resuscitated ventricular tachyarrhythmias were randomly assigned to receive an ICD or amiodarone and were then followed for a mean of 3 years. There were 98 and 83 deaths in the amiodarone and ICD groups, respectively. We used multivariate Cox analysis to assess the impact of baseline parameters on the mortality in the amiodarone group. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, advanced age, and poor NYHA status identified high-risk patients ( P =0.0001 to 0.0009). Quartiles of risk were constructed, and the mortality reduction associated with ICD treatment in each quartile was assessed. There was a significant interaction between risk quartile and the ICD treatment effect ( P =0.011). In the highest risk quartile, there was a 50% relative risk reduction (95% CI 21% to 68%) of death in the ICD group, whereas in the 3 lower quartiles, there was no benefit. Patients who are most likely to benefit from an ICD can be identified with a simple risk score (≥2 of the following factors: age ≥70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and NYHA class III or IV). Thirteen of 15 deaths that were prevented by the ICD occurred in patients with ≥2 risk factors. Conclusions —In CIDS, patients at highest risk of death benefited most from ICD therapy. These can be identified easily on the basis of age, poor ventricular function, and poor functional status.