1. Accurate pain reporting training diminishes the placebo response: Results from a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial
- Author
-
Grant H. Kruger, Roi Treister, Steven E. Harte, Mark J. Field, Nevil Khurana, Oluwadolapo D Lawal, Jonathan D. Shecter, Nathaniel P. Katz, and John Bothmer
- Subjects
Male ,Physiology ,Maternal Health ,Sensory Physiology ,Pregabalin ,lcsh:Medicine ,Blood Pressure ,Osteoarthritis ,Vascular Medicine ,law.invention ,Mathematical and Statistical Techniques ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Pregnancy ,law ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,030212 general & internal medicine ,lcsh:Science ,Pain Measurement ,Analgesics ,Cross-Over Studies ,Multidisciplinary ,Depression ,Pharmaceutics ,Drugs ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Middle Aged ,Sensory Systems ,Somatosensory System ,Meta-analysis ,Physical Sciences ,Hypertension ,Neuropathic pain ,Female ,Statistics (Mathematics) ,Research Article ,medicine.drug ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Drug Research and Development ,Analgesic ,Pain ,Documentation ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Education ,03 medical and health sciences ,Double-Blind Method ,Rheumatology ,Drug Therapy ,Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy ,Mental Health and Psychiatry ,medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Clinical Trials ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures ,Statistical Methods ,Pharmacology ,Mood Disorders ,Arthritis ,lcsh:R ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Pain Sensation ,medicine.disease ,Crossover study ,Clinical trial ,Physical therapy ,Women's Health ,lcsh:Q ,Self Report ,Clinical Medicine ,Mathematics ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Neuroscience ,Meta-Analysis - Abstract
Analgesic trials frequently fail to demonstrate efficacy of drugs known to be efficacious. Poor pain reporting accuracy is a possible source for this low essay-sensitivity. We report the effects of Accurate-Pain-Reporting-Training (APRT) on the placebo response in a trial of Pregabalin for painful-diabetic-neuropathy. The study was a two-stage randomized, double-blind trial: In Stage-1 (Training) subjects were randomized to APRT or No-Training. The APRT participants received feedback on the accuracy of their pain reports in response to mechanical stimuli, measured by R-square score. In Stage-2 (Evaluation) all subjects entered a placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Primary (24-h average pain intensity) and secondary (current, 24-h worst, and 24-h walking pain intensity) outcome measures were reported. Fifty-one participants completed the study. APRT patients (n = 28) demonstrated significant (p = 0.036) increases in R-square scores. The APRT group demonstrated significantly (p = 0.018) lower placebo response (0.29 ± 1.21 vs. 1.48 ± 2.21, mean difference ± SD = -1.19±1.73). No relationships were found between the R-square scores and changes in pain intensity in the treatment arm. In summary, our training successfully increased pain reporting accuracy and resulted in a diminished placebo response. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
- Published
- 2018