Search

BACKGROUND Cabozantinib improves survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after prior antiangiogenics. The best treatment at disease progression (PD) is unknown. Being also a AXL/MET inhibitor, involved in acquired resistance, we hypothesized a prolonged tumor growth control in patients continuing cabozantinib despite PD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients receiving cabozantinib after the first line between 2014 and 2020. We compared patients maintaining cabozantinib after first PD due to clinical benefit and good tolerability with those who changed therapy. The postprogression survival (PPS) of both was our primary endpoint. RESULTS We analyzed 89 patients: 45 received cabozantinib beyond PD and 44 switched therapy. 40.4%, 31.5%, and 28.1% of patients received 1, 2, or >2 prior treatment, respectively. 84.3% were intermediate-poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database risk. Patients continuing cabozantinib showed a higher response rate to cabozantinib before PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and were more heavily pretreated. Continuing cabozantinib showed a significantly longer PPS compared with switching therapy (median PPS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS We observed longer PPS in patients continuing cabozantinib beyond PD, suggesting that this could be an effective option.

171 Background: The introduction of DOC in mCSPC raises the issue concerning the best therapeutic strategy after pts’ progression. Different options are available: a switch strategy with an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI), an alternative chemotherapy-based strategy based on cabazitaxel (CABA), or a re-challenge strategy by using DOC again. In this view, it could be of interest to describe the outcomes of post-progression strategies adopted in the real-world. From 2014, ECHOS multicenter study is collecting real world data from mCSPC pts in Italy. Here, we present post-progression preliminary findings of 568 pts treated with DOC and enrolled in the study within 31 December 2021. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of the mCSPC pts treated with DOC in 34 Italian Institutions. For each pt we recorded pre- and post-DOC clinical history, baseline characteristics, treatment details and clinical outcomes. Results: Among the 568 pts, after a median follow-up of 22 mos, 389 pts experienced disease progression and 227 died. The progression occurred after a median of 10.4 mos (range 0.3-62.1). Among the progressed pts, 47 did not received further active treatment, while 342 received at least one systemic treatment after progression. The most frequent post-progression treatment was ARSI (73.1%), followed by CABA (19%), combination of ARSI and PARP inhibitors within clinical trials (2.6%), DOC re-challenge (2.1%), platinum-based chemotherapy (1.8%), and radium 223 (0.9%). The outcomes of the first-line agents and the number of subsequent administered life-prolonging agents (LPA) are described. The length of disease control obtained with DOC influenced the duration of first post-progression therapy: in pts who progressed after DOC within 10.4 mos, the duration was significantly shorter than in pts with later disease progression (5.9 mos vs 9.8 mos, p < 0.0001). Noteworthy, pts with more aggressive disease leading to a faster progression received more frequently CABA than ARSI: disease progression after DOC in CABA group and in ARSI group occurred with a median of 9.1 mos and 13.2 mos, respectively (p = 0.002). Conclusions: This is one of the largest real-world report on the outcomes of first post-progression therapies after DOC in mCSPC pts. We showed that ARSI-based therapy is the most common strategy adopted after DOC progression. Our findings suggested a different first post-progression strategy according to the time of post-DOC progression onset. [Table: see text]

167 Background: Although CHAARTED trial suggested a survival advantage in de novo (DN) high volume (HV) mCSPC pts, the use of DOC is still debated according to the timing of either metastatic onset [relapsed (REL) vs DN] or disease burden [low volume (LV) vs HV]. In this view, it could be of interest to describe the real-world use of DOC. From 2014, ECHOS multicenter study is collecting real world data from mCSPC pts in Italy, where DOC was the only reimbursed agent until recently. Here, we present study results after first data lock at the end of 2021. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of the mCSPC pts treated with DOC in 34 Italian Institutions. For each pt we recorded pre and post-DOC clinical history, baseline characteristics, treatment details and clinical outcomes. Results: We identified 568 pts [median age 66.5 yrs (range 43-85)]. Most of them were classified as having a DN/HV disease (78%): the remaining had a REL/LV (2.5%), a REL/HV (8.1%), and a DN/LV disease (11.5%). After a median follow-up of 22 mos, 389 pts experienced disease progression and 227 died. The survival outcomes according to the metastases timing and disease volume is reported in the table. Conclusions: Our real-world experience shows that DOC is proposed not only in DN/HV pts, but also in the other pts regardless of metastases timing and disease volume. The prognosis of DN/HV pts treated with DOC appears to be worse than in CHAARTED trial. These findings need to be confirmed by further analyses made on larger number of pts enrolled in the ECHOS trial. [Table: see text]

648 Background: The oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor Cabozantinib (CABO) is frequently used to treat patients with metastatic RCC. Polypharmacy is common in elderly pts, thus several drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cabozantinib may ensue. Methods: ZEBRA /MEET-URO 9 was a prospective, real world trial enrolling pts ≥ 70 years with mRRC treated with CABO at 13 Italian Oncology Centers. All concomitants drugs administered to pts were collected and categorized according to active principles and indication. DDIs were identified through a dedicated software (Lexicomp), scientific databases (Sider4.1) and published articles. Results: we enrolled 104 pts, median age 75.8 years (range 70.2-87.4 yrs). Overall, 91.4% of the cohort was treated at a reduced dose either upfront or due to side effects. Pts took a median of 6 concomitant drugs (IQR: 4-9), for a total of 131 active principles. Software analysis identified 4 DDIs (warfarin, apixaban, diltiazem and furosemide); whereas scientific reports allowed us to identify 15 additional DDIs involving metoprolol, nebivolol, olmesartan, amiloride, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, polyenoic omega-3 fatty acids, loperamide, metoclopramide, metformin, dutasteride, dexamethasone, prednisone, cetirizine and doxazosin. Seventy pts with potential DDIs experienced a trend for higher rate of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to other pts, although difference was not statistically significant (48.7% v 23.5 %, p=0.485). The table summarizes the main DDIs and suggestions to avoid or mitigate their effects Conclusions: the risk of DDIs was not negligible in our cohort of elderly mRCC pts treated with CABO, although the frequent dose reductions of CABO probably confounded their impact on toxicities. Unremitting attention to concomitant medications in the elderly is thus warranted. [Table: see text]

637 Background: The combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR), bone metastases and IMDC score in the novel prognostic Meet-URO score has shown a higher prognostic performance than the IMDC score alone in mRCC pts receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab or cabozantinib in two retrospective analyses and 1st line nivolumab-ipilimumab in a real-world prospective study [http://bit.ly/Meet-URO15_score]. Further validation is needed since this score represents an easy prognostic tool for clinical practice with no additional costs. Methods: A real-world analysis of elderly (≥70 yo) mRCC pts treated with any line cabozantinib was conducted in the multicenter observational prospective Zebra study. Baseline Meet-URO score was assessed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the Harrell’s c-index was calculated to compare accuracy of survival prediction of the Meet-URO and IMDC scores. Results: 104 mRCC pts received cabozantinib as 1st (38%), 2nd (20%), 3rd (33%) and 4th (8%) line, with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (mo) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.4 mo. According to the IMDC score, favorable- (15%), intermediate- (65%) and poor-risk (19%) pts had a mOS not reached (NR), 15.6 and of 5.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.011). Reclassifying the population according to the Meet-URO score, we observed that group 1 (10%) and group 2 (25%) had both mOS NR, whereas group 3 (33%), group 4 (25%) and group 5 (8%) had a mOS of 13.6, 12.5 and 3.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.001). Moreover, the Meet-URO score maintained its discrimination ability also merging group 1-2 vs 3-4 vs 5 (p < 0.001). NLR < 3.2 was the heaviest component of the score (p < 0.001, mOS 24.8 vs 11.5 mo). The Meet-URO score (using both original with 5 groups and modified with 3 groups) has shown a higher prognostic power than the IMDC score alone (c-index of 0.686 and 0.676 vs 0.622). Conclusions: This analysis confirmed the higher accuracy in survival stratification of the Meet-URO score compared with the IMDC score alone also in a specific population like elderly mRCC pts treated with cabozantinib. NLR was confirmed as a strong prognostic factor with cabozantinib. Further applications of the Meet-URO score in mRCC pts treated with first-line immune-combinations are planned and highly awaited. Clinical trial information: 2018/116/PU .

647 Background: Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor registered for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for the first or subsequent lines. Tolerability in real world elderly patients is poorly documented. G8 is a short test for vulnerability gaining increased interest as a screening tool for trials in geriatric oncology. Methods: ZEBRA/MEET-URO 9 was a prospective multicenter study of safety and activity of CABO administered to pts ≥70 years with mRCC, either in the first or subsequent lines of treatment, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. All pts underwent G8 score at baseline, with a cut-off for vulnerability of 14 or below. Data on tolerability and activity were collected prospectively after signature of informed consent. Results: A total of 104 pts started CABO at 13 Italian Centers, 38,5% as first line. Median age was 75.8 yrs (range 70.2-87.4 yrs, 26 pts ≥80 yrs), 73.1% males. IMDC score was good 19.2%, intermediate 53.9%, poor 26.9%. Primary tumor had been removed in 82.7% of pts, histology was clear cell 78.8%, papillary 8.7%, chromophobe 5.8%, unclassified 6.7%. G8 score was ≤14 in 65.4% of pts. Up-front dose reduction of CABO was more frequent in pts with low G8 score (79.4 vs 41.7%, p=0.003), but eventually the majority of pts (91.4%) underwent dose reductions of CABO. After a median treatment of 6.4 months (0.5-26.1 months), 38.4% of pts developed G3-4 toxicities, 22.1% interrupted treatment due to adverse events, 2.8% (3 pts) died due to cardiovascular or thromboembolic events. Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI=5.8-12.6 months) in first line, 10.0 months (5.8-15.6) in second or further lines, median OS was 20.1 months (11.1-not reached) and 15.6 months (12.5-not reached), respectively. G8 score ≤14 did not correlate with rate of temporary interruptions >7 days, hospitalization, incidence of G3-5 toxicities, as well as with PFS. Pts with G8 score ≤14 had a trend for reduced OS, but difference was not statistically significant both in the first and further lines of treatment. Conclusions: Screening G8 test was positive in more than a half of pts, underlying the need for detailed geriatric assessment and increased clinical monitoring of such patients. A G8 score ≤14 correlated with up-front dose reduction of CABO but not with G3-5 toxicities probably due to the high rates of dose reductions in the whole cohort. Correlation between low G8 score and OS could not be demonstrated in this population.

638 Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) have been reported in approximately 1% of patients (pts) with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Outcome data are limited due to the rarity of this metastatic site. Therefore, the aim of our study is to describe RCC pts with PM treated as per clinical practice. Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcome data of pts with PM from RCC were retrospectively collected from 12 Italian oncological referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group, from January 2016 to September 2022. Results: We collect 91 RCC pts with PM. 87/91 pts received systemic treatment, 4/87 only best supportive care. First line treatment included TKI and ImmuneOncology(IO)-TKI with different Objective Response Rate(ORR) (41% vs 53.8%, respectively) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (57.1% and 80.7%, respectively) as well as median PFS (9.9 mo (95%CI 4.5-15.4) for TKI and not reached (NR) for IO-TKI (69.7% pts were free from progression at a median follow up of 13.8 months). Primary refractory (PR) pts were 35.7% for TKI and 7.7% for IO-TKI. According to IMDC score, mPFS was consistent among risk categories, 36.8 mo (95%CI 9.6-63.9) for good risk pts, 13.8 mo (95%CI 8.8-18.8) for intermediate pts and 2.9 mo (95%CI 2.2-3.7) for poor risk pts. Synchronous PM was associated to shorter mPFS 11.0 (95%CI 3.1-19.0) compared to patients with metacronous involvement as well as ORR (31.3%) and DCR (43.1%) whereas PR was higher (34.7%). Only 43/87 pts (45.7%) received a second line treatment that was TKI ( ORR 30.7%; DCR 61.5%; or IO (ORR 20.6%; DCR 41.3%). mOS was 21.8 mo (12.0-31.5) for TKI and NR for pts treated with IO-TKI (80.8 alive at 1 yrs). According to IMDC score, mOS was NR for good risk pts, 24.6 (95%CI 15.8-33.3) and 3.4 (95%CI 2.4-4.3) for intermediate and poor risk, respectively. Conclusions: We report one of the largest case series regarding PM from RCC. Poor risk patients according to IMDC score, sarcomatoid feature and liver metastasis were more represented in our population, compared to historical control, suggesting a more aggressive behavior of PM mRCC. Outcome data suggest that TKI-IO as first line treatment, compared to TKI monotherapy, and TKI as second line, compared to IO, are more active treatment for these pts with dismal prognosis. Nevertheless, synchronous PM has been reported in 57% of pts with poorer outcome and lower response rate. [Table: see text]

BackgroundImmune-Oncology (IO) improves Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), with curative intent, in patients treated with IO is not well defined. The aim of our paper is to evaluate the impact of previous nephrectomy on outcome of mRCC patients treated with IO.Methods287 eligible patients were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the MeetUro association. Patients treated with IO as second and third line were included, whereas patients treated with IO as first line were excluded. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare Progression Free Survival (PFS) and OS between groups. In our analysis, both CN and RN were included. The association between nephrectomy and other variables was analyzed in univariate and multivariate setting using the Cox proportional hazard model.Results246/287 (85.7%) patients had nephrectomy before IO treatment. Median PFS in patients who underwent nephrectomy (246/287) was 4.8 months (95%CI 3.9–5.7) vs 3.7 months (95%CI 1.9–5.5) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.78; 95%CI 0.53 to 1.15; p = 0.186). Median OS in patients who had previous nephrectomy (246/287) was 20.9 months (95%CI 17.6–24.1) vs 13 months (95%CI 7.7–18.2) in patients who did not it (HR log rank 0.504; 95%CI 0.337 to 0.755; p = 0.001). In the multivariate model, nephrectomy showed a significant association with OS (HR log rank 0.638; 95%CI 0.416 to 0.980), whereas gland metastases were still associated with better outcome in terms of both OS (HR log rank 0.487; 95%CI 0.279 to 0.852) and PFS (HR log rank 0.646; 95%CI 0.435 to 0.958).ConclusionsIO treatment, in patients who had previously undergone nephrectomy, was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS. Further prospective trials would assess this issue in order to guide clinicians in real word practice.

Radium 223 was introduced for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer based on the results of a randomized controlled trial showing risk reduction for death and skeletal events. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients receiving radium 223 in a real-world setting.We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in the Triveneto region of Italy.One hundred fifty-eight patients received radium 223 in our region. After a median follow-up of 9.5 months, 75 patients died. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months. Seventy-one (45%) patients achieved progression as best response. Thirty-seven (23%) patients stopped the treatment early because of progression. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was prognostic for OS (18.4 vs. 12.3 vs. 7.5 months; 0 vs. 1, P = .0062; 0 vs. 2, P = .0002), whereas previous prostatectomy or docetaxel exposure were not. A neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio ≥ 3 significantly impacted OS (18.1 vs. 9.7 months; P .001) and slightly impacted PFS (6.6 vs. 5.6 months; P = .05). Patients with a baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) value ≥ 220 U/L had worse OS and PFS (24.1 vs. 10.5 months; 7.2 vs. 5.5 months; P .001). Patients with changes in ALP value achieved better OS (P = .029) and PFS (P = .002). There was no difference according to the line of therapy (0 vs. ≥ 1; P = .490). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were anemia, asthenia, and thrombocytopenia.This large real-world report confirms comparable OS and PFS data when compared with the pivotal study, as well as the predictive role of ALP and neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio. The definition of the optimal position of radium 223 in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has still to be defined.

Objectives The aim of our study was to collect data about of the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to enhance data about efficacy and safety of treatment beyond immune-oncology (IO). Materials and methods A total of 162 eligible patients, progressing to IO, were enrolled from 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro association. Baseline characteristics, outcome data and toxicities were retrospectively collected. Descriptive analysis was made using median values and ranges. Kaplan-Meier method and Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test were performed to compare differences between groups. Results A total of 111 patients (68.5%) were treated after IO progression. In all, 51 patients (31.5%) did not receive further treatment for clinical deterioration. Median IO progression free survival (PFS) was 4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-4.8). IO-PFS tends to be longer in patients reporting adverse events (AE) of any grade (5.03 [95% CI: 3.8-6.1] vs. 2.99 [95% CI: 2.4-3.5] months P=0.004). Subsequent therapies included cabozantinib (n=79, 48%), everolimus (n=11, 6.7%), and others (n=21, 12.9%).Median PFS post-IO was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1-7.8). Cabozantinib showed longer PFS compared with everolimus (7.6 mo [95% CI: 5.2-10.1] vs. 3.2 mo [95% CI: 1.8-4.5]) (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1026-0.7968) and other drugs (4.3 mo [95% CI: 1.3-7.4]) (hazard ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.35-1.23). All grade AE were reported in 83 patients (74%) and G3 to G4 AE in 39 patients (35%). Target therapies post-IO showed median overall survival of 14.7 months (95% CI: 0.3-21.4). Conclusions In our real world experience after progression to IO, vascular endotelial groth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, given to patients, proved to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a better outcome in terms of median PFS.

Background: Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites. Results: From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS – mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups. Conclusion: The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.

Aim: INVIDIa was a retrospective, multicenter study, exploring the clinical efficacy of influenza vaccine in 300 cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was immature at the initial report. Methods: We reported the final OS analysis from the original study population and within subgroups. Results: Both at the univariate and multivariate analysis, the occurrence of influenza syndrome (IS) was significantly related to better OS in the overall population (OR: 0.53 [95% CI: 0.32–0.88]; p = 0.01). In the lung cancer subgroup, receiving flu vaccine and/or developing IS was related to better OS (p = 0.04). Within elderly patients, the flu vaccine was the main variable for the relative OS advantage (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Receiving the flu vaccine and/or developing IS was related to better OS within the INVIDIa population.

Background:This prospective, multicentre, observational INVIDIa-2 study is investigating the clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in advanced-cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), enrolled in 82 Italian centres, from October 2019 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until 30 April 2020. All the ILI episodes, laboratory tests, complications, hospitalizations and pneumonitis were recorded. Therefore, the study prospectively recorded all the COVID-19 ILI events.Patients and methods:Patients were included in this non-prespecified COVID-19 analysis, if alive on 31 January 2020, when the Italian government declared the national emergency. The prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases was detected as ILI episode with laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. Cases with clinical-radiological diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-like ILIs), were also reported.Results:Out of 1257 enrolled patients, 955 matched the inclusion criteria for this unplanned analysis. From 31 January to 30 April 2020, 66 patients had ILI: 9 of 955 cases were confirmed COVID-19 ILIs, with prevalence of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3–2.4], a hospitalization rate of 100% and a mortality rate of 77.8%. Including 5 COVID-like ILIs, the overall COVID-19 prevalence was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.5–3.1), with 100% hospitalization and 64% mortality. The presence of elderly, males and comorbidities was significantly higher among patients vaccinated against influenza versus unvaccinated ( p = 0.009, p Conclusion:COVID-19 has a meaningful clinical impact on the cancer-patient population receiving ICIs, with high prevalence, hospitalization and an alarming mortality rate among symptomatic cases. Influenza vaccination does not protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

290 Background: Second (2L) or third-line (3L) treatment options for mRCC have dramatically changed in the last years. The standard of care as per Italian Regulatory Agencies approvals is N or C. To date, there are no criteria for the choice between N and C, which both demonstrated OS gain in the pivotal trials. Methods: We planned a retrospective, real world analysis of the use of N and C as 2L and 3L treatment in 17 Oncology Units of Veneto Region. All consecutive patients (pts) with mRCC treated in advanced setting in 2017-2018 were included. Results: We identified 170 pts, 73% males, median age 68.4 years. All pts started a 2L treatment while only 59% received a 3L treatment. In our cohort, patients with NLR > 3 at treatment start had a shorter OS (43 vs 90 months (mos), p < 0.0001); IMDC classification maintained its prognostic role. In 2L, N was administrated in 108 pts (63%), C in 29 pts (17%); in 3L N was administrated in 42 pts (25%), C in 49 pts (29%). Reported oncologists’ reasons for 2L choice were: change of mechanism of action compared to first line (28%), response to previous TKI (21.2%), intolerance to TKI (17.6%), previous toxicity (12.9%), tumor burden (11.2%), age of the patient (4.1%). Median OS and PFS in 2L were 28.4 and 6.6 mos for N, 16.8 and 6.6 mos for 2L C. Median OS and PFS in 3L were 27 and 5.2 mos for N, 16.6 and 7.5 mos for C. 46 pts received the sequence of drugs N > C, 12 the opposite sequence C > N. Median OS for N > C vs C > N were 96.6 vs 36 mos (p > 0.0001); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 mos (p = ns). The cost per patient of the sequence N > C is 51.606 € while for the sequence C > N is 31.480,00 €. Between the two sequences a cost effectiveness per month of survival analysis was performed: the cost per month of OS for the sequence N > C was 534,18 € while for the sequence C > N was 874,46 €, heavily higher. Conclusions: In our real-world setting cohort, most of the pts received N as 2L treatment and a minority received C. Outcome of single drug are superimposable to published literature. With the limits of the retrospective nature of the study, with a cost per month of OS lower a much longer OS, the sequence N > C appear to be a better treatment strategy.

320 Background: The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib (Cabo) is an effective treatment option for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, data on the optimal sequencing of Cabo and other available therapies are lacking. In particular, the strategy of continuing Cabo administration after disease progression (PD) has never been investigated yet. In light of its ability of inhibiting MET and AXL, which are implied in VEGFR acquired resistance, the hypothesis of a prolonged efficacy in slowing tumor growth, despite first radiological PD, is worth to be investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of mRCC patients (pts) treated with oral Cabo as second or subsequent line between 2014 and 2020 in 11 Italian Oncology units. Our study population included pts treated beyond RECIST first PD due to the clinical benefit and tolerance to therapy demonstrated. As a control group we analyzed pts treated with other therapies (thyrosin-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), everolimus, nivolumab or other) after first radiological PD with Cabo. Our aim was to evaluate the post-progression outcome according the two treatment strategies: Cabo beyond PD or other subsequent therapy. Results: 89 pts were included in the analysis: 45 pts received Cabo beyond PD and 44 another therapy: 22 pts nivolumab, 7 everolimus, 6 sorafenib and the others lenvatinib plus everolimus, sunitinib, HD-IL2, pazopanib or axitinib. The median age of all pts was 61.6 years (22.7-83.2) and 77.5% were male. 40.4% and 31.5% of pts had received one or two prior treatment lines, respectively; the remaining 28.1% received Cabo > 3 line. At Cabo start, 83.9% were intermediate-poor risk according IMDC score (77.8% in CABO beyond PD and 90.5% in the control group) and the most common metastatic sites were lung (76.4%), lymph nodes (69.7%), bone (56.2%), liver (30.3%) and brain (14.8%). The objective response rate to Cabo before PD was significantly higher in pts continuing Cabo beyond PD than in those who were treated with other after first radiological PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and a longer but not statistically significant PFS was observed (median 8.1 vs 5.9 months, p = 0.377). Moreover, the median number of prior therapy lines was significantly higher for pts who were treated with Cabo beyond PD than other (2 vs 1, p = 0.016). Median duration of treatment with Cabo beyond PD was 6.4 months. In addition, continuing Cabo beyond PD was associated with a significantly better post-progression overall survival (OS) than switching to other therapy at PD (median OS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, Hazard Ratio 0.66, 95%CI 0.48 – 0.92, p = 0.011). Conclusions: This study showed a longer post-progression OS in pts continuing Cabo beyond PD than in those who switched to another therapy. With the limitations of a retrospective analysis, this is the first evidence suggesting that maintaining Cabo beyond PD is an effective strategy in pts with mRCC.

e17088 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) treatment demonstrated to improve Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous citoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy with curative intent in patients (pts) treated with IO is not well defined. Methods: 229 eligible pts, with a least one radiological assessment of response according to the RECIST 1:1 criteria, were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers. Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were collected. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare PFS and OS between groups. Results: 153(66.8%) pts received IO as second line, 61(26.6%) as third line and 15(6.6%) pts as further line. 54 pts (23.6%) were good risk, 144(62.9%) were intermediate and 31(13.5%) were poor risk according to IMDC score. 189(82.5%) pts underwent nephrectomy (of them 72(32.4%) pts had synchronous metastatic disease and underwent CN), while 40(17.4%) pts did not. Nephrectomy was performed before IO treatment. ECOG PS, at the beginning of IO, was 0 for 167 pts (72.9%), the other 62 (27.1%) had ECOG PS 1 or 2. At a median follow up time of 17.5 months (mo), 13 (5.7%) pts are still in treatment while 216 (94.3%) experienced progression. 81 (35.3%) pts were treated after IO progression with mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors. 63 (27.5%) pts continued IO beyond progression. G3-G4 iAE were reported in 46 pts (20%). Median IO-PFS was 4.5 months in pts who did not undergo nephrectomy and 2.9 mo in pts who did (HR log rank 0.713, 95%CI 0.4788 to 1.063; p= 0.0582). Median IO-OS was 18.4 mo in pts who underwent nephrectomy and 10.3 mo in pts who did not (HR log rank 1.915, 95%CI 1.118 to 3.281; p= 0.0024). The difference in OS was irrespective of the IMDC criteria and the lines of treatment. Conclusions: In our real world experience, in mRCC pts treated with IO, previous nephrectomy was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS with all the limitations of a retrospective collection.

e17081 Background: Biomarkers to select mRCC patients most likely to benefit to immunotherapy are needed. The retrospective multicentre Meet-URO-15 study evaluated the prognostic role of peripheral blood cells in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab. Methods: Complete blood count was assessed at the first four cycles of Nivolumab. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) according to bNLR. NLR was defined as neutrophil / lymphocyte (cutoff = 3) and ΔNLR the difference between NLR at 2nd cycle and bNLR (median as cutoff = 1.1). Results: From October 2015 to October 2019, 470 patients started Nivolumab as 2nd (67%), 3rd (22%) and > 3rd (11%) line. Median age was 66 years, 71% were male and 83% had clear cell histology. Baseline IMDC group was favorable in 25%, intermediate in 63% and poor in 12%. Lymph-nodes, visceral and bone metastases were present in 54%, 91% and 36%. mOS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 34.8 and 7.5 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 30% and 61%. bNLR was available in 404 patients: bNLR < 3 (54%) correlated with statistically significant longer PFS [11.4 vs 5.4 months; HR 1.69 (1.33-2.15)] and OS [46.2 vs 17.2 months; HR 2.37 (1.72-3.26)] (both p< 0.001), with similar ORR (35% vs 30%, p= 0.28) but higher DCR (71% vs 52%, p< 0.001). ΔNLR was available in 360 patients: ΔNLR < 1.1 (73%) correlated with a statistically significant improvement of PFS [11.2 vs 4.9 months; HR 1.53 (1.16-2.03), p= 0.03], OS [Not Reached vs 19.7 months; HR 1.83 (1.28-2.61), p= 0.001], ORR (37% vs 23%, p= 0.011) and DCR (68% vs 53%, p= 0.008). Multivariate analyses adjusted for IMDC group, line of therapy and metastatic sites, confirmed the statistically significant correlation of bNLR and ΔNLR with OS, PFS and DCR. Conclusions: Our study showed the statistically significant correlation of lower bNLR and early ΔNLR with longer OS, PFS and higher DCR in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab.

751 Background: Biomarkers to select mRCC patients most likely to benefit to immune-checkpoint inhibitors are still needed. The ongoing retrospective multicentre Meet-URO 15 (I-BIO-REC) study evaluates the prognostic role of peripheral blood cells in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods:The primary endpoint of the study was median overall survival (mOS) according to baseline neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), but here preliminary analyses on baseline LMR and SII (secondary endpoints) are reported. LMR was defined as the ratio of lymphocyte to monocyte (cutoff = 3) and SII as platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte (cutoff = 1375). Results: From May 2016 to January 2019 189 patients started nivolumab as 2nd (62%), 3rd (25%) and > 3rd (13%) line. Median age was 69 years, 67% were male and 87% had clear cell histology. Baseline IMDC group was favorable in 26%, intermediate in 63% and poor in 11%. Lymph-nodes, visceral and bone metastases were present in 55%, 92% and 37%. mOS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 30.5 months and 9.5 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 28% and 57%. LMR was available in 150 patients: LMR ≥ 3 (44%) correlated with statistically significant longer OS [NR vs 26.8 months, HR 0.50 (0.29-0.88); p = 0.016] but not PFS (10.3 vs 9.9 months, HR 0.87 (0.58-1.31); p = 0.5) with similar ORR (34% vs 33%) and DCR (60% vs 63%) compared to LMR < 3. SII was available in 162 patients. SII < 1375 (82%) correlated with statistically significant longer PFS [11.5 vs 3.4 months; HR 2.16 (1.36-3.43), p = 0.001] and OS [NR vs 9.5 months; HR 3.87 (2.21-6.78), p < 0.001] with higher ORR (35% vs 20%) and DCR (65% vs 40%) compared to SII ≥ 1375. Univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for IMDC group, line of therapy and metastatic sites, confirmed the statistically significant correlation between SII with PFS and OS, but not for LMR. Conclusions: Preliminary analyses of our study showed a prognostic role of baseline SII, while it is uncertain for LMR in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.

691 Background: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), immune-oncology (IO), alone or in combination, (IO-IO or IO-TKI) has changed the therapeutic scenario. Few real-world data are available about safety and outcome after IO progression. Methods: Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were retrospectively collected from 162 eligible pts treated in 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group and progressing to IO. Results: 111 pts (68,5%) were treated after progression to IO. 142 (87.6%) pts received IO as second line, 5 pts as first line and 16 pts as further line. Subsequent therapy included cabozantinib (n = 79, 48.0%), everolimus (n = 11, 6.7%), sunitinib (n = 6, 3.7%) and others (n = 15, 9.25%). Median IO-PFS was 4 months (95%CI 3.1-4.8) with no difference in pts pretreated with pazopanib or sunitinib (4 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) vs 3,9 months (95%CI 2.9-4.9) p = 0.5). PFS tends to be longer in pts reporting adverse events of any grade (5.03 (95%CI 3.8-6.1) vs 2,99 (95%CI 2.4-3.5) months p = 0.004) or without nephrectomy (4.1 vs 2.9 months p = 0.071). Median PFS, in pts treated post-IO, was 6.5 months (95%CI 5.1-7.8). In term of best response, 55 pts (49%) had stability of disease/partial response and 29 pts (26%) had progressive disease, for the other pts treatment is still ongoing. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at progression to IO, had longer PFS, 11 months (95%CI 5.7-17.5) as well as those treated with cabozantinib (7.6 months, 95%CI 5.2-10.1) compared to everolimus, (3.2 months, 95%CI 1.8-4.5) or other drugs (4.3 months, 95%CI 1.3-7.4) p = 0.001. All grade adverse events were reported in 83 pts (74%) with G3-G4 adverse events in 39 pts (35%). Median overall survival, from first line, was 41,1 months (95%CI 30.4-51.8). Conclusions: In our real world experience after progression to IO, most pts received VEGF-TKI and mTOR inhibitors that showed to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a longer mPFS.

Aim: Considering the unmet need for the counseling of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CKI) about influenza vaccination, an explorative study was planned to assess flu vaccine efficacy in this population. Methods: INVIDIa was a retrospective, multicenter study, enrolling consecutive advanced cancer outpatients receiving CKI during the influenza season 2016–2017. Results: Of 300 patients, 79 received flu vaccine. The incidence of influenza syndrome was 24.1% among vaccinated, versus 11.8% of controls; odds ratio: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.23–4.59; p = 0.009. The clinical ineffectiveness of vaccine was more pronounced among elderly: 37.8% among vaccinated patients, versus 6.1% of unvaccinated, odds ratio: 9.28; 95% CI: 2.77–31.14; p

Despite a high proportion of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) experiences failure after/during first-line treatment, a few studies focused on salvage therapy are available, often with disappointing results. Herein, we report feasibility and activity of a combination of rituximab, ifosfamide and etoposide (R-IE regimen) in a multicentre series of patients with PCNSL relapsed or refractory to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. We considered consecutive HIV-negative patients ≤75 years old with failed PCNSL treated with R-IE regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m2, day 0; ifosfamide 2 g/m2/day, days1–3; etoposide 250 mg/m2, day 1; four courses). Twenty-two patients (median age 60 years; range 39–72; male/female ratio: 1:4) received R-IE as second-line (n = 18) or third-line (n = 4) treatment. Eleven patients had refractory PCNSL, and 11 had relapsing disease. Twelve patients had been previously irradiated. Sixty (68%) of the 88 planned courses were actually delivered; only one patient interrupted R-IE because of toxicity. Grade 4 hematological toxicity was manageable; a single case of grade 4 non-hematological toxicity (transient hepatotoxicity) was recorded. Response was complete in six patients and partial in three (overall response rate = 41%; 95%CI: 21–61%). Seven patients were successfully referred to autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection; four responders were consolidated with high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplant. At a median follow-up of 24 months, eight responders did not experience relapse, two of them died of neurological impairment while in remission. Six patients are alive, with a 2-year survival after relapse of 25 ± 9%. We concluded that R-IE is a feasible and active combination for patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL. This regimen allows stem cell collection and successful consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Hodgkin's disease (HD) has greatly benefited from new technologies in terms of less invasive and more accurate staging as well as improved overall and relapse-free survival. However, the likelihood of late adverse effects of treatment, including second tumors, has increased due to the longer survival of patients with HD. Today's trend is to aim at minimal therapeutic exposure while guaranteeing lower therapy-related morbidity. This encourages new research efforts but also leads to less uniformity in treatments, as observed in the Veneto Region in Italy. The Gruppo Veneto Linfomi, composed of representatives of Radiotherapy and Oncology Departments of the Veneto Region, has been analyzing this problem and proposing therapy guidelines since 1995. A set of 10 prognostic factors has been developed to identify three prognostic groups: highly favorable (HF) are patients up to 40 years of age presenting with stage I disease involving only one site of disease with a maximum tumor diameter (TD) of 5 cm and no adverse factors. In this group only mantle field irradiation is recommended if the disease is located in the neck or above, inverted-Y irradiation is recommended for distal subdiaphragmatic lesions, and subtotal nodal irradiation in all other cases. HF cases may also be treated like favorable cases with limited chemoradiation. Favorable (F) cases are patients in stage I with a TD greater than 5 cm and smaller than 10 cm or stage II, up to three sites of disease and negative prognostic factors for systemic disease. All other patients are included in the “not favorable” (NF) group at Ann Arbor stage I or II with any adverse prognostic factor. For the latter two groups, chemotherapy with the ABVD or Stanford V regimen precedes involved-field radiotherapy to sites with a TD of at least 5 cm. The total irradiation dose is determined by local disease extent and level of response to chemotherapy. Images on which the radiation fields are drawn serve as an important reference to improve the homogeneity of treatments. This protocol includes a list of adverse treatment effects (chemo- and/or radiotherapy) together with follow-up guidelines for the early detection of secondary cancers in previously irradiated patients.

Since September 1996, 48 untreated patients with bulky or advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease received the 12-week Stanford V chemotherapy regimen followed by consolidation radiotherapy at a dose of 36 Gy to bulky mediastinal disease and 30.6 Gy to the initial sites of disease ≧3 cm in transverse diameter. After the combined therapy, 46 of 48 (96%) achieved complete remissions. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year overall survival was 95% and freedom from progression 86%.There were no treatment-related deaths. All but one premenopausal female patient (who received pelvic and inguinal irradiation) recovered normal menses. Until now no case of secondary leukemia or myelodysplasia was observed. Our results confirm that the Stanford V regimen with consolidation radiotherapy is safe and effective in patients with bulky or advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease, achieving very high remission and overall 5-year survival rates. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the extent of all complications.

Despite a high proportion of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) experiences failure after/during first-line treatment, a few studies focused on salvage therapy are available, often with disappointing results. Herein, we report feasibility and activity of a combination of rituximab, ifosfamide and etoposide (R-IE regimen) in a multicentre series of patients with PCNSL relapsed or refractory to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. We considered consecutive HIV-negative patients ≤75 years old with failed PCNSL treated with R-IE regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m(2) , day 0; ifosfamide 2 g/m(2) /day, days1-3; etoposide 250 mg/m(2) , day 1; four courses). Twenty-two patients (median age 60 years; range 39-72; male/female ratio: 1:4) received R-IE as second-line (n = 18) or third-line (n = 4) treatment. Eleven patients had refractory PCNSL, and 11 had relapsing disease. Twelve patients had been previously irradiated. Sixty (68%) of the 88 planned courses were actually delivered; only one patient interrupted R-IE because of toxicity. Grade 4 hematological toxicity was manageable; a single case of grade 4 non-hematological toxicity (transient hepatotoxicity) was recorded. Response was complete in six patients and partial in three (overall response rate = 41%; 95%CI: 21-61%). Seven patients were successfully referred to autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection; four responders were consolidated with high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplant. At a median follow-up of 24 months, eight responders did not experience relapse, two of them died of neurological impairment while in remission. Six patients are alive, with a 2-year survival after relapse of 25 ± 9%. We concluded that R-IE is a feasible and active combination for patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL. This regimen allows stem cell collection and successful consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant.

Summary Background Patients with Hodgkin's disease whose initial complete remissions (CR) after primary chemotherapy were longer than 1 year are thought to have better prognoses than patients whose initial remissions were shorter than 1 year. However, only a few studies have analyzed the long-term survival in addition to the results of retreatment in patients relapsing after CR lasting more than 1 year. Patients and methods We analyzed the data of 40 patients with Hodgkin's disease who were treated in a single institution and whose CR were ≷1 year after primary chemotherapy. Therapy at relapse was not standardized: of 36 patients evaluable for response, 29 received second-line chemotherapy and 7 received radiotherapy alone. Results Sixty-five percent of the patients obtained CR (median duration: 21 months). Sixty-eight percent of the complete responders relapsed again; however, long-lasting third and fourth remissions were observed. All of the 7 patients whose retreatment consisted of radiotherapy alone obtained CR, but only 1 is in continuous CR. The presence of nodular sclerosing histologic subtype, the absence of extranodal involvement and the use of hybrid MOPP/ABVD or ABVD alone as salvage treatment are independently associated with a higher CR rate and a higher probability of 5-year survival. The 5-year survival for all 40 patients is 49%. For the patients obtaining CR, the 5-year survival and the 5-year relapse-free survival are 76% and 25%, respectively. However, the survival curve continues to fall in the succeeding years because of third and fourth relapses and the occurrence of secondary acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Conclusions A high percentage of patients relapsing more than 12 months after primary chemotherapy can obtain second CR. Even if most of our patients eventually relapse, third and fourth CRs are not uncommon. However, the long-term survival is low and it is further diminished by secondary leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

From January 1988 to December 1991, 55 elderly patients (14 pretreated and 41 previously untreated) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) entered a prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of a combination of mitoxantrone (7-9 mg/m2), VP 16-213 (150 mg, 2-hour infusion on day 1, and 200 mg per os on days 3 and 5) and low-dose prednisone (25 mg days 1-5) (MVP regimen), recycling every 21-28 days. The median age was 75 (range 64-93). All but 4 pretreated patients had intermediate- or high-grade lymphomas. Complete remissions were obtained in 22 of 40 (55%) evaluable previously untreated patients, and partial remissions in 10 (2 of these obtained complete remissions after radiotherapy), for an overall response rate of 80%. The median duration of response was 12 months. At 24 months the overall survival was 52% and the relapse-free survival was 31%. Of 14 pretreated patients complete remissions were obtained in 4 (29%) and partial remissions in 3. Granulocytopenia and fever were the most important side effects; two patients contracted bronchopneumonia and one of them died. Other toxicities were mild. We conclude that this combination chemotherapy is effective as first-line and salvage treatment in elderly patients with intermediate- and high-grade NHL, and that it is feasible on an outpatient basis, with manageable toxicity.

Aim: This survey verified reproducibility in the real world of the survival data reported in the literature. Methods: This study reviewed individual data of 1238 pts treated with TT from mid 2007 to December 2012 in 35 Italian Institutions. Results: Median age was 66 yrs (range 24-91). Histology was clear cell (CC) (84%), with sarcomatoid component (7%), others (9%); nephrectomy was performed in 88% of the pts and 36.5% of the pts presented with ≥3 metastatic sites. PS (ECOG) was 0 in 53%, 1 in 34%, ≥2 in 9%, ne in 4% of the pts. Median OS (mOS) was 24 mo. Sunitinib (su) was the 1stline (ln) therapy (tx) in 964 pts (78%), sorafenib (so) in 152 (12%), temsirolimus (tem) in 51 (4%), others in 71 (5%). Response rate to 1st ln tx was: CR 4%, PR 31%, SD 30%, PD 28%, ne 7%. In 918 evaluable pts, MSKCC risk score was poor (10%), intermediate (46%) and good (18%). Dose reduction was required in 46%; 39% of the pts had a duration of 1st ln tx 6 mo, no tx interruption, no dose reduction were statistically related to execution of 2nd line tx. Cox multivariate analysis showed that execution of 2nd line tx, no dose reduction, type of drug, 1st ln duration >6 mo, CC histology, no tx interruption, MSKCC risk score, PS, type of response were statistically related to OS. mOS (all p Nephrectomy vs not 28 / 6.5 Metastatic sites ≤2 vs ≥3 31 / 18 PS 0 vs 1 vs ≥2 38.5 /18.6 / 6 CR vs PR vs SD vs PD 62.5 /39 / 29 / 7.8 Poor vs intermediate vs good MSKCC risk score 6.4 / 26 /46 Dose reduction: yes vs not 19.8 / 33.6 1st ln duration 6 mo 9.1 / 36.5 Conclusions: This large survey: i) confirmed survival data for the individual drugs ii) identified predictive and prognostic factors iii) showed similar OS between the principal sequences of tx. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A case of secondary chronic myelogenous leukemia after successful therapy for Hodgkin's disease is reported. The patient was diagnosed as having stage IIIA Hodgkin's disease, at the age of 33. He underwent staging laparosplenectomy and was treated with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. Forty three months after the diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease, a Philadelphia-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia developed. It required periodic chemotherapy and each time a remission, lasting several months (up to 14 months), was obtained. The disease had an unusually prolonged clinical course, and the blast crisis, of lymphoid type, occurred only 17 years later.

Patients (pts) with HD can suffer from pulmonary toxicity after both chemotherapy (CT) (particularly after bleomycin) and radiotherapy (RT) (the mantle field involves mediastinum and lung apices). Pts and methods Spirometry, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (KCO), analyses of blood gases at rest and during exercise were performed in 27 pts (age: 27–59 yrs), 5 – 23.9 yrs (median: 13,1) after the end of therapy (mediastinal RT, 20–45 Gy: 23 pts, bleomycin: 16 pts). Results Dyspnoea on exertion was reported in 8 pts. The mean values of the vital capacity (VC), residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC) and KCO significantly deviated from the predicted normal values (p = .003, P 2 during exercise. Conclusions A mild restrictive pulmonary defect is a common finding in long-survivors of HD. Pts irradiated for bulky mediastinal HD or treated for relapse have a higher risk of clinically significant respiratory impairment.

Aims and Background Patients treated for Hodgkin's disease with chemotherapy or with the association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy have an increased risk of secondary leukemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the leukemogenic risk due to these treatment modalities. Methods We performed a case-control study on a population of 1410 patients treated for Hodgkin's disease from 1970 to 1990 in our Institute. Among these patients, we identified 25 cases of secondary leukemia and 3 cases of myelodysplasia, all occurring more than one year after the diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease. Three cases occurred among the patients treated with radiotherapy alone. When we analyzed the risk in relation to the type of treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or both), the comparisons were relative to patients treated with radiotherapy alone. Results We found that chemotherapy alone is associated with a fivefold increased risk (odds ratio = 5.4) compared with radiotherapy alone. When both treatments are used, the risk is not further increased (odds ratio = 4.4). Patients receiving more than 6 courses of chemotherapy have an excess risk (relative risk = 2.5) compared with those treated with 6 courses or less. No increased risk was observed after splenectomy. Conclusions This study confirms an increased incidence of secondary leukemia occurring in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease. The increased risk seems to be correlated with the number of courses of alkylating agent therapy, whereas it is unaffected by the addition of radiotherapy.

Summary Background In patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease (HD), the alternation of MOPP with ABVD or hybrid MOPP/ABVD are associated with a high CR rate and a high probability of 5-year survival. However, even after effective chemotherapy the risk of nodal relapse is not negligible, and not only in initial bulky site(s) of disease. For this reason, in an attempt to prevent relapses after combination chemotherapy alone, we performed a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and toxic effects of 6 courses of hybrid MOPP/ABVD followed by radiotherapy (RT) in stages II A bulky, II B, HI and also in stage IV with bulky disease or residual after chemotherapy. Patients and methods From January 1985 to August 1993,133 patients with HD (128 newly diagnosed, stage IIA bulky-IV, 5 in first relapse after RT) were treated according to the following program: 6 courses of the hybrid MOPP/ABVD regimen followed by RT (STNI + spleen in stages II A, II B, III without pelvic lymph node involvement, TNI + spleen in stage II with pelvic lymph node involvement, involved field in stage IV with bulky disease or residual after chemotherapy). The total dose of RT was 4000 cGy to the sites of bulky or residual disease and 2000 cGy to the other sites. Results After hybrid MOPP/ABVD, 107 of 130 (82.3%) fully evaluable patients were classified as in CR or CR(U). After completion of RT, 108 patients were in CR and 3 were in PR, for an overall response rate of 85%. With a median follow-up duration of 45 months, the actuarial 5-year survival is 76% and the progression-free survival 68.6%. So far, only 14 patients have relapsed (6 within the irradiation field) and the 5-year relapse-free survival is 82.5%. Conclusion Six courses of hybrid MOPP/ABVD followed by RT in stages IIA bulky, IIB, III and in stage IV with bulky disease or residual after chemotherapy produced a high CR rate with low risk of relapse. However, a longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the late effects of combined therapy.