Search

Delayed immune reconstitution is a major challenge after matched unrelated donor (MUD) stem cell transplant (SCT). In this randomized phase 2 multi-center trial, Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD25/71 allodepleted donor T cells to improve immunity after unrelated donor stem cell transplant (NCT01827579), the authors tested whether allodepleted donor T cells (ADTs) can safely be used to improve immune reconstitution after alemtuzumab-based MUD SCT for hematological malignancies.Patients received standard of care or up to three escalating doses of ADTs generated through CD25+/CD71+ immunomagnetic depletion. The primary endpoint of the study was circulating CD3+ T-cell count at 4 months post-SCT. Twenty-one patients were treated, 13 in the ADT arm and eight in the control arm.The authors observed a trend toward improved CD3+ T-cell count at 4 months in the ADT arm versus the control arm (230/µL versus 145/µL, P = 0.18), and three ADT patients achieved normal CD3+ T-cell count at 4 months (700/µL). The rates of significant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were comparable in both cohorts, with grade ≥2 acute GVHD in seven of 13 and four of eight patients and chronic GVHD in three of 13 and three of eight patients in the ADT and control arms, respectively.These data suggest that adoptive transfer of ADTs is safe, but that in the MUD setting the benefit in terms of T-cell reconstitution is limited. This approach may be of more use in the context of more rigorous T-cell depletion.

Over recent years cellular therapy has seen substantial progress across Europe, particularly cell-based immunotherapy/ immune effector cells (IECs), with the approval of autologous CD19 CAR-T products for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies-diffuse large B cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (paediatric, teenage and young adult) and mantle cell lymphoma). Whilst this development has delivered benefit to patients with poor risk disease, there is potential for associated toxicities which require careful patient selection, assessment, monitoring, treatment and follow-up care. Nurses play a crucial role in supporting patients throughout this pathway. This chapter focuses on autologous cell-based immunotherapies (CAR-T) process, infusion, toxicities, management and the patient pathway, whilst also exploring non-cell-based immunotherapies, cell therapy in solid tumours and the role of clinical trials.

A randomised phase II trial of single fraction or multi-fraction SABR (stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy) with atezolizumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (AZTEC trial) Abstract: BACKGROUND: In patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), immunotherapy has shown acceptable safety and efficacy in a PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) positive population. Pre-clinical evidence has demonstrated that SABR can prime a more effective systemic anti-tumor response in combination with checkpoint inhibition. It is currently unknown if single or multi-fraction SABR scheduling synergises best with atezolizumab therapy. METHODS: This was a multi-centre, open label, phase 2 randomised trial of patients with advanced TNBC, unselected for (PD-L1) status, who had recurred at least 6 months post completion of (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and received less than 2 lines of treatment in the metastatic setting. Participants were randomised to 20Gy SABR in 1 fraction or 24Gy SABR in 3 fractions to 1-4 sites of disease, with at least one metastasis left unirradiated. Within 5 days following the final fraction of radiotherapy atezolizumab was commenced at a dose of 1200 mg every 21 days and continued for up to 24 months, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression- free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include efficacy according to PD-L1 IHC status (positive: SP142 ≥1%) and TIL (tumour infiltrating lymphocyte) quantity, response assessment, overall survival and safety. Results presented are from interim analysis performed 18 weeks after the last patient commenced treatment. RESULTS: Fifty evaluable patients were recruited and randomised between 20th November 2018 and 12thApril 2021 with a median age of 57 [35 - 79] yrs. Thirty (60%) and 20 (40%) patients had received none or one previous line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, respectively. 14/40 (35%) patients were PD-L1 positive at baseline and 26/42 (62%) had TIL≥5%. Median follow-up was 17 months. The median PFS for the 20 Gy arm was 2.5 (90% CI: 1.7-4.5) months, 3.1 (90% CI: 1.8-3.9) months for the 24 Gy arm. For both arms combined, the PFS was 3.1 (90% CI: 1.8-3.9) months, with no difference between the arms, HR 1.2 (95% CI: 0.6-2.1), p=0.64. PFS by PD-L1 IHC status and TIL CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy between single and multi-fraction SABR in combination with Atezolizumab was similar and toxicity was acceptable. Efficacy was seen in PD-L1 positive and negative patients. Longer follow-up is required to assess the effect on OS.. (Research support and funding provided by the imCORE Network on behalf of F. Hoffmann-La Roche; AZTEC ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03464942) Table 1.Response AssessmentResponse, n (%)All patients (n = 50)Patients with measurable disease (n = 32)Best objective response (non-SABR lesion)CR3 (6)2 (6)PR2 (4)2(6)NCR/NPD8 (16)0SD13 (26)13 (41)PD24 (48)15 (47)ORR (CR + PR)5 (10); 95% CI: 3-224 (12%); 95% CI: 4-29DCR (CR + PR + SD + non-CR/non-PD ≥24 weeks)a11 (22%); 95% CI: 12-377 (23%); 95% CI: 10-41aOne patient withdrew at 8 weeks and was not assessable for DCR. Citation Format: Steven David, Peter Savas, Shankar Siva, Michelle White, Michael W Neeson, Shane White, Gavin Marx, Robyn Cheuk, Michelle Grogan, Maria Farrell, Jessica Foudoulis, Annette Dempsey, Paul J Neeson, Mathias Bressel, Sherene Loi. A randomised phase II trial of single fraction or multi-fraction SABR (stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy) with atezolizumab in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (AZTEC trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-02.

Karl S Peggs and Sarah J Albon contributed equally to the work and are joint first author Introduction Alemtuzumab reduces the incidence of GVHD after unrelated donor stem cell transplant (MUD SCT) but delays immune reconstitution resulting in high morbidity/mortality from viral infections. Previous studies have suggested that adoptive transfer of allodepleted donor T cells (ADTs) improves immunity after SCT but this has never been tested in a randomised study. We developed a methodology for selective immunomagnetic depletion of alloreactive T-cells upregulating CD25 and CD71 after activation with host dendritic cells (DC) and showed that ADTs retain anti-viral responses with minimal host alloreactivity (Samarasinghe et al Blood 2010). We have now tested whether ADTs can safely be used to improve immune reconstitution after MUD SCT for haematological malignancies in a randomised Phase II multi-centre clinical study; ICAT (NCT01827579). Methods Patients undergoing Alemtuzumab-based peripheral blood SCT from a 9/10 or 10/10 MUD for haematological malignancy were randomised 2:1 to receive either the ATIMP (ADTs) or standard of care. Two weeks prior to SCT, patients randomised to ATIMP underwent a leucapheresis from which DCs were generated. Irradiated patient-derived DCs were then co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from an unstimulated leucapheresis/500ml blood draw from the donor to activate alloreactive T cells. Four days later, the co-culture was depleted of CD25+ and CD71+ fractions by immunomagnetic depletion on the CliniMACs, sampled for residual alloreactivity and sterility, and cryopreserved. Patients randomised to the ATIMP were scheduled to receive 3 escalating doses of ADTs (0.1x106/Kg at day 30, 0.3x106/Kg at day 60 and 1x106/Kg at day 90 post-SCT) until either there was >grade 1 aGVHD or they had normal circulating T cells (>700/µL). The primary end-point of the study was circulating CD3+ T cell count at 4 months post-SCT with one-sided 15% significance level. Acute/chronic GVHD were graded using the Seattle/NIH criteria respectively. Results Twenty one patients were treated, 13 on the ATIMP arm and 8 on the control arm. The median age was 53 years and 67% (14) were male. 12 were AML/Myelodysplasia, 5 NHL, 3 CLL/CML and 1 HL. The median follow-up time is 14 months. Five of 13 ATIMP patients received 1 dose of ADTs, 4/13 2 doses and 4/13 all 3 doses. The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was comparable between the arms. Overall, 7/13 ATIMP patients developed significant (>Grade 2) acute GVHD compared to 4/8 of the control arm (p>0.99). 3/13 patients in the ATIMP arm and 2/8 patients in the control arm developed severe aGVHD (all Grade 3). Three of 13 ATIMP cohort patients developed chronic GVHD (1 mild, 1 moderate, 1 severe), compared to 3/8 (all mild) in the control cohort. At 4 months, the circulating CD3+ T cell count mean was 730/µL (range 10-4080) in the ATIMP group and 212.5/µL (range 10-500) in the control group (1-sided p=0.11). However, the data was not normally distributed (Wilcoxon 1-sided p=0.18). Three ATIMP patients had high CD3+ T cell count at 4 months (>1000/µL). At 6 months, the mean circulating CD3+ T cell count was 833.6/µL (range 20-2690) and 327.5/µL (range 10-860). At month 4, the mean PHA stimulation index in the ATIMP arm was 16.8 (range 0.67- 73.1) vs 3.8 (range 1.1-8.2) in the control group. At 4 and 6 months post-SCT, spectratyping analysis showed no evidence of a difference in Vβ diversity between the 2 arms in both CD4+ and CD8+ cells. The 1-year survival rate in the ATIMP cohort is 92% vs 88% in the control, and 1-year disease free survival rate 67% in the ATIMP cohort vs 70% in the control. Conclusions These data suggest that adoptive transfer of ADTs improves T cell reconstitution in some patients after MUD SCT and that the GVHD rates were similar between ATIMP and control groups. Figure 1: Kinetics of T cell recovery after transplant in ATIMP (blue) and Control (red) patients. Mean +/- SEM shown. Figure 1 Disclosures Peggs: Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghorashian:UCLB: Patents & Royalties: UCLB; Celgene: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria. Amrolia:UCLB: Patents & Royalties.

TPS3622 Background: Standard neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in a complete pathological response rate of 10-30%: but 20-40% of patients (pts) are non-responders, 10-15% have local recurrence. Tumoural immune infiltrates are predictive of response. Preclinical studies show that radiotherapy (RT) via interferon signaling is immuno-stimulatory, enhancing local/distant tumour cell death. RT also stimulates PDL1 production and the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid derived suppressor cells. Hence PDL1 inhibition may be required to enhance the immuno-stimulatory effects of RT. Hypothesis: In pts with resectable LARC, the anti-PDL1 antibody Avelumab post LCCRT may enhance the pathological/imaging response rates whilst potentially reducing local/distant relapse rates. Methods: (1) Trial Design: Phase II single arm trial, across 6 Australian sites (2) Endpoints: (a) Primary; Pathological response rate post-LCCRT, as documented by central pathologist, (b) Secondary; MRI/FDG PET imaging responses at 8 weeks post LCCRT (pre-surgery). Toxicity. (c) Exploratory; Tumoural immune cell subsets/checkpoint expression (by multiplex immunohistochemistry and in-vitro functional assays) and ctDNA analysis at baseline and during treatment. Distant relapse-free survival and the documentation of sites of relapse. (3) Sample size: An increase in the proportion of pathological complete responses by > 25% (from 10% to 35%) will be considered clinically important. Power = 90%, α = 0.05, 41 pts are required– an additional 4 pts to allow for drop-out. Total sample size = 45pts. Treatment: All pts to receive standard LCCRT (50.4Gy RT plus 5FU [225mg/m2/day/CI] or Capecitabine [825mg/m2 BID on RT days] over 5.5 weeks). Post LCCRT (prior to surgery), pts receive 4 cycles Avelumab (10mg/kg, q2 weeks). Surgical resection 10-12 weeks post LCCRT. Fresh tumour biopsy and ctDNA sampling pre LCCRT, pre Cycle 1 Avelumab and at surgery. Response by FDG PET and pelvic MRI pre surgery. Pts to be followed up for 2 years. Major Inclusion Criteria: Pts with LARC, MRI stage T3b-4/N1-2/M0, planned for LCCRT followed by curative resection, tumoural lower border within 12cm from the anal verge, measurable disease (RECIST1.1), ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function and no contraindications to Avelumab therapy. Current Enrolment: 11 of the planned 45 patients enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03299660.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, accounting for nearly 30% of all female cancers. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in women in the US. During the last two decades, the benefits of early detection, early intervention, and postoperative treatment have resulted in decreased breast cancer mortality in the US general population. However, the distribution of breast cancer mortality varies among geographic regions of the US. The reasons for this variation remain largely unknown. We choose to look for a possible association between the numbers of physicians in each city within the State of Florida and breast cancer survival among women aged 40+ residing in that particular city. Using Cox Proportionate Hazard Modeling, we found a direct association between the number of physicians practicing in a particular city and breast cancer survival in that particular city (P = 0.0153), while controlling for other known risk factors affecting survival. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between physician supply and cancer survival within defined geographic areas. This association shows as physician density consistently dropped in a defined geographic area so did time of survival among women with breast cancer.