Search

Background: MRI‐guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) requires unique quality assurance equipment to address MR‐compatibility needs, minimize electron return effect, handle complex dose distributions, and evaluate real‐time dosimetry for gating. Plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) are an attractive option to address these needs. Purpose: To perform a comprehensive characterization of a multi‐probe PSD system in a low‐field 0.35 T MR‐linac, including detector response assessment and gating performance. Methods: A four‐channel PSD system (HYPERSCINT RP‐200) was assembled. A single channel was used to evaluate repeatability, percent depth dose (PDD), detector response as a function of orientation with respect to the magnetic field, and intersession variability. All four channels were used to evaluate repeatability, linearity, and output factors. The four PSDs were integrated into an MR‐compatible motion phantom at isocenter and in gradient regions. Experiments were conducted to evaluate gating performance and tracking efficacy. Results: For repeatability, the maximum standard deviation of repeated measurements was 0.13% (single PSD). Comparing the PSD to reference data, PDD had a maximum difference of 1.12% (10 cm depth, 6.64 × 6.64 cm2). Percent differences for rotated detector setups were negligible (< 0.3%). All four PSDs demonstrated linear response over 10–1000 MU delivered and the maximum percent difference between the baseline and measured output factors was 0.78% (2.49 × 2.49 cm2). Gating experiments had 400 cGy delivered to isocenter with < 0.8 cGy variation for central axis measures and < 0.7 cGy for the gradient sampled region. Real‐time dosimetry measurements captured spurious beam‐on incidents that correlated to tracking algorithm inaccuracies and highlighted gating parameter impact on delivery efficiency. Conclusions: Characterization of the multi‐point PSD dosimetry system in a 0.35 T MR‐linac demonstrated reliability in a low‐field MR‐Linac setting, with high repeatability, linearity, small intersession variability, and similarity to baseline data for PDD and output factors. Time‐resolved, multi‐point dosimetry also showed considerable promise for gated MR‐Linac applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known for its accurate soft tissue delineation of tumors and normal tissues. This development has significantly impacted the imaging and treatment of cancers. Radiomics is the process of extracting high-dimensional features from medical images. Several studies have shown that these extracted features may be used to build machine-learning models for the prediction of treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Various feature selection techniques and machine models interrogate the relevant radiomics features for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. This study aims to provide an overview of MRI radiomics features used in predicting clinical treatment outcomes with machine learning techniques. The review includes examples from different disease sites. It will also discuss the impact of magnetic field strength, sample size, and other characteristics on outcome prediction performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known for its accurate soft tissue delineation of tumors and normal tissues. This development has significantly impacted the imaging and treatment of cancers. Radiomics is the process of extracting high-dimensional features from medical images. Several studies have shown that these extracted features may be used to build machine-learning models for the prediction of treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Various feature selection techniques and machine models interrogate the relevant radiomics features for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. This study aims to provide an overview of MRI radiomics features used in predicting clinical treatment outcomes with machine learning techniques. The review includes examples from different disease sites. It will also discuss the impact of magnetic field strength, sample size, and other characteristics on outcome prediction performance.

Background: MRI‐Linac systems enable daily diffusion‐weighed imaging (DWI) MRI scans for assessing glioblastoma tumor changes with radiotherapy treatment. Purpose: Our study assessed the image quality of echoplanar imaging (EPI)‐DWI scans compared with turbo spin echo (TSE)‐DWI scans at 0.35 Tesla (T) and compared the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and distortion of EPI‐DWI on 0.35 T MRI‐Linac compared to high‐field diagnostic MRI scanners. Methods: The calibrated National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Phantom was scanned on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, and 1.5 T and 3 T MRI with EPI‐DWI. Five patients were scanned on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac with a TSE‐DWI sequence, and five other patients were scanned with EPI‐DWI on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac and a 3 T MRI. The quality of images was compared between the TSE‐DWI and EPI‐DWI on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac assessing signal‐to‐noise ratios and presence of artifacts. EPI‐DWI ADC values and distortion magnitude were measured and compared between 0.35 T MRI‐Linac and high‐field MRI for both phantom and patient studies. Results: The average ADC differences between EPI‐DWI acquired on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners and published references in the phantom study were 1.7%, 0.4% and 1.0%, respectively. Comparing the ADC values based on EPI‐DWI in glioblastoma tumors, there was a 3.36% difference between 0.35 and 3 T measurements. Susceptibility‐induced distortions in the EPI‐DWI phantoms were 0.46 ± 1.51 mm for 0.35 MRI‐Linac, 0.98 ± 0.51 mm for 1.5 T MRI and 1.14 ± 1.88 mm for 3 T MRI; for patients ‐0.47 ± 0.78 mm for 0.35 T and 1.73 ± 2.11 mm for 3 T MRIs. The mean deformable registration distortion for a phantom was 1.1 ± 0.22 mm, 3.5 ± 0.39 mm and 4.7 ± 0.37 mm for the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac, 1.5 T MRI, and 3 T MRI scanners, respectively; for patients this distortion was –0.46 ± 0.57 mm for 0.35 T and 4.2 ± 0.41 mm for 3 T. EPI‐DWI 0.35 T MRI‐Linac images showed higher SNR and lack of artifacts compared with TSE‐DWI, especially at higher b‐values up to 1000 s/mm2. Conclusion: EPI‐DWI on a 0.35 T MRI‐Linac showed superior image quality compared with TSE‐DWI, minor and less distortions than high‐field diagnostic scanners, and comparable ADC values in phantoms and glioblastoma tumors. EPI‐DWI should be investigated on the 0.35 T MRI‐Linac for prediction of early response in patients with glioblastoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR‐linac, a dosimeter which can measure time‐resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR‐linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR‐linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time‐resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR‐linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ionizing radiation transport mechanisms in presence of magnetic fields can be described in terms of formalisms based on the Boltzmann radiation transport equation. However, when the transport occurs not in vacuum but in scattering media the difficulty of its analytical calculation considerably increases because of the random character of the radiation interaction processes with the scattering medium. In this context, the present work proposes and describe a methodology to characterize effects due to strong magnetic fields on electron trajectories by means of numerical techniques, such asMonte Carlo simulation, to be applied to scattering media, typically present in MRI-LINAC devices in radiotherapy situations. The obtained results for air as the scattering material show that variations of the electrons’ trajectories depend jointly on the magnetic field and the interactions with the scattering medium. Increasing the magnetic field intensity enhances the curvature of the trajectories while decreasing the displacement in the radial direction.

We characterized the on-board megavoltage imager (MVI) of a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy machine for beam output checks. Linearity and repeatability of its dose response were investigated. Alignment relative to the beam under clinical circumstances was evaluated for a year using daily measurements. Linearity and short-term repeatability were excellent. Long-term repeatability drifted 0.8 % per year, which can be overcome by monthly cross calibrations. Long-term alignment was stable. Thus, the MVI has suitable characteristics for beam output checks.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided radiotherapy with multileaf collimator (MLC)‐tracking is a promising technique for intra‐fractional motion management, achieving high dose conformality without prolonging treatment times. To improve beam‐target alignment, the geometric error due to system latency should be reduced by using temporal prediction. Purpose: To experimentally compare linear regression (LR) and long‐short‐term memory (LSTM) motion prediction models for MLC‐tracking on an MRI‐linac using multiple patient‐derived traces with different complexities. Methods: Experiments were performed on a prototype 1.0 T MRI‐linac capable of MLC‐tracking. A motion phantom was programmed to move a target in superior‐inferior (SI) direction according to eight lung cancer patient respiratory motion traces. Target centroid positions were localized from sagittal 2D cine MRIs acquired at 4 Hz using a template matching algorithm. The centroid positions were input to one of four motion prediction models. We used (1) a LSTM network which had been optimized in a previous study on patient data from another cohort (offline LSTM). We also used (2) the same LSTM model as a starting point for continuous re‐optimization of its weights during the experiment based on recent motion (offline+online LSTM). Furthermore, we implemented (3) a continuously updated LR model, which was solely based on recent motion (online LR). Finally, we used (4) the last available target centroid without any changes as a baseline (no‐predictor). The predictions of the models were used to shift the MLC aperture in real‐time. An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used to visualize the target and MLC aperture during the experiments. Based on the EPID frames, the root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) between the target and the MLC aperture positions was used to assess the performance of the different motion predictors. Each combination of motion trace and prediction model was repeated twice to test stability, for a total of 64 experiments. Results: The end‐to‐end latency of the system was measured to be (389 ± 15) ms and was successfully mitigated by both LR and LSTM models. The offline+online LSTM was found to outperform the other models for all investigated motion traces. It obtained a median RMSE over all traces of (2.8 ± 1.3) mm, compared to the (3.2 ± 1.9) mm of the offline LSTM, the (3.3 ± 1.4) mm of the online LR and the (4.4 ± 2.4) mm when using the no‐predictor. According to statistical tests, differences were significant (p‐value <0.05) among all models in a pair‐wise comparison, but for the offline LSTM and online LR pair. The offline+online LSTM was found to be more reproducible than the offline LSTM and the online LR with a maximum deviation in RMSE between two measurements of 10%. Conclusions: This study represents the first experimental comparison of different prediction models for MRI‐guided MLC‐tracking using several patient‐derived respiratory motion traces. We have shown that among the investigated models, continuously re‐optimized LSTM networks are the most promising to account for the end‐to‐end system latency in MRI‐guided radiotherapy with MLC‐tracking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: MRI can provide better visualization of tumors and nearby organs at risk (OAR) than CT for fast and accurate contouring during online adaptive MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (MRI-guided SBRT) for pancreatic and other intra-abdominal cancers. Pre-set MRI sequences provided in a 1.5T MRI scanner hybrid with a linear accelerator can be used during MRI-guided SBRT, but they often limit tumor and OAR visualization and require a long image acquisition time. This study retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with pancreatic and intra-abdominal cancers that underwent CT and MR simulations and 3–5 fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The visualization of tumors and OAR was improved with T1W imaging, which is essential for online adaptive planning and resulted in fast and accurate contouring in a shorter imaging time. A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer's pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Current auto-segmentation methods for glioblastoma utilize mainly pre-operative 1.5T and 3T MRI. The first commercial MRI-linear accelerator (linac) radiation treatment platform acquires low-field (0.35T) post-operative MRI at the delivery of each treatment. This study presents the first automatic brain lesion segmentation network developed for MRI-linac to track tumor changes during radiotherapy. The tumors and resection cavities are automatically segmented using a deep learning network, allowing for daily monitoring of tumor volume changes, creation of tools necessary for adaptive radiotherapy of glioblastoma, and providing MRI regions of interest for further analyses that may discover prognostic markers. Glioblastoma changes during chemoradiotherapy are inferred from high-field MRI before and after treatment but are rarely investigated during radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning network to automatically segment glioblastoma tumors on daily treatment set-up scans from the first glioblastoma patients treated on MRI-linac. Glioblastoma patients were prospectively imaged daily during chemoradiotherapy on 0.35T MRI-linac. Tumor and edema (tumor lesion) and resection cavity kinetics throughout the treatment were manually segmented on these daily MRI. Utilizing a convolutional neural network, an automatic segmentation deep learning network was built. A nine-fold cross-validation schema was used to train the network using 80:10:10 for training, validation, and testing. Thirty-six glioblastoma patients were imaged pre-treatment and 30 times during radiotherapy (n = 31 volumes, total of 930 MRIs). The average tumor lesion and resection cavity volumes were 94.56 ± 64.68 cc and 72.44 ± 35.08 cc, respectively. The average Dice similarity coefficient between manual and auto-segmentation for tumor lesion and resection cavity across all patients was 0.67 and 0.84, respectively. This is the first brain lesion segmentation network developed for MRI-linac. The network performed comparably to the only other published network for auto-segmentation of post-operative glioblastoma lesions. Segmented volumes can be utilized for adaptive radiotherapy and propagated across multiple MRI contrasts to create a prognostic model for glioblastoma based on multiparametric MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Possible advantages of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for the treatment of brain tumors include improved definition of treatment volumes and organs at risk (OARs) that could allow margin reductions, resulting in limited dose to the OARs and/or dose escalation to target volumes. Recently, hybrid systems integrating a linear accelerator and an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan (MRI-linacs, MRL) have been introduced, that could potentially lead to a fully MRI-based treatment workflow. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the published literature regarding the adoption of MRL for the treatment of primary or secondary brain tumors (last update November 3, 2022), retrieving a total of 2487 records; after a selection based on title and abstracts, the full text of 74 articles was analyzed, finally resulting in the 52 papers included in this review. Results and discussion: Several solutions have been implemented to achieve a paradigm shift from CT-based radiotherapy to MRgRT, such as the management of geometric integrity and the definition of synthetic CT models that estimate electron density. Multiple sequences have been optimized to acquire images with adequate quality with on-board MR scanner in limited times. Various sophisticated algorithms have been developed to compensate the impact of magnetic field on dose distribution and calculate daily adaptive plans in a few minutes with satisfactory dosimetric parameters for the treatment of primary brain tumors and cerebral metastases. Dosimetric studies and preliminary clinical experiences demonstrated the feasibility of treating brain lesions with MRL. Conclusions: The adoption of an MRI-only workflow is feasible and could offer several advantages for the treatment of brain tumors, including superior image quality for lesions and OARs and the possibility to adapt the treatment plan on the basis of daily MRI. The growing body of clinical data will clarify the potential benefit in terms of toxicity and response to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To propose a framework called live‐view golden‐angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) MRI for low‐latency and high‐fidelity real‐time volumetric MRI. Methods: Live‐view GRASP MRI has two stages. The first one is called an off‐view stage and the second one is called a live‐view stage. In the off‐view stage, 3D k‐space data and 2D navigators are acquired alternatively using a new navi‐stack‐of‐stars sampling scheme. A 4D motion database is then generated that contains time‐resolved MR images at a sub‐second temporal resolution, and each image is linked to a 2D navigator. In the live‐view stage, only 2D navigators are acquired. At each time point, a live‐view 2D navigator is matched to all the off‐view 2D navigators. A 3D image that is linked to the best‐matched off‐view 2D navigator is then selected for this time point. This framework places the typical acquisition and reconstruction burden of MRI in the off‐view stage, enabling low‐latency real‐time 3D imaging in the live‐view stage. The accuracy of live‐view GRASP MRI and the robustness of 2D navigators for characterizing respiratory variations and/or body movements were assessed. Results: Live‐view GRASP MRI can efficiently generate real‐time volumetric images that match well with the ground‐truth references, with an imaging latency below 500 ms. Compared to 1D navigators, 2D navigators enable more reliable characterization of respiratory variations and/or body movements that may occur throughout the two imaging stages. Conclusion: Live‐view GRASP MRI represents a novel, accurate, and robust framework for real‐time volumetric imaging, which can potentially be applied for motion adaptive radiotherapy on MRI‐Linac. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an important imaging modality in the field of radiotherapy (RT) in the past decade, especially with the development of various novel MRI and image‐guidance techniques. In this review article, we will describe recent developments and discuss the applications of multi‐parametric MRI (mpMRI) in RT simulation. In this review, mpMRI refers to a general and loose definition which includes various multi‐contrast MRI techniques. Specifically, we will focus on the implementation, challenges, and future directions of mpMRI techniques for RT simulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At the time of diagnosis, the vast majority of prostate carcinoma patients have a clinically localized form of the disease, with most of them presenting with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In this setting, various curative-intent alternatives are available, including surgery, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy can be considered as a valid alternative strategy for localized prostate cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy can be administered according to different schedules. Proton beam radiotherapy represents a promising strategy, but further studies are needed to make it more affordable and accessible. At the moment, new technologies such as MRI-guided radiotherapy remain in early stages, but their potential abilities are very promising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy allows for the reduction of safety margins in dose escalated treatment of rectal tumors. With the use of smaller margins, precise tumor delineation becomes more critical. In the present study we investigated the impact of rectal ultrasound gel filling on interobserver variability in delineation of primary rectal tumor volumes. Methods: Six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac without (MRI_e) and with application of 100 cc of ultrasound gel transanally (MRI_f). Eight international radiation oncologists expert in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) on both MRI scans. MRI_f scans were provided to the participating centers after MRI_e scans had been returned. Interobserver variability was analyzed by either comparing the observers’ delineations with a reference delineation (approach 1) and by building all possible pairs between observers (approach 2). Dice Similarity Index (DICE) and 95 % Hausdorff-Distance (95 %HD) were calculated. Results: Rectal ultrasound gel filling was well tolerated by all patients. Overall, interobserver agreement was superior in MRI_f scans based on median DICE (0.81 vs 0.74, p

Background: We present our experience with MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for 200 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with minimum 3-month follow-up. Methods: Treatment planning included fusion of the 0.35-Tesla planning MRI with multiparametric MRI and PET-PSMA for Group Grade (GG) 2 or higher and contour review with an expert MRI radiologist. No fiducials or rectal spacers were used. Prescription dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over 2 weeks to the entire prostate with 3-mm margins. Daily plan was adapted if tumor and organs at risk (OAR) doses differed significantly from the original plan. The prostate was monitored during treatment that was automatically interrupted if the target moved out of the PTV range. Results: Mean age was 72 years. Clinical stage was T1c, 85.5%; T2, 13%; and T3, 1.5%. In addition, 20% were GG1, 50% were GG2, 14.5% were GG3, 13% were GG4, and one patient was GG5. PSA ranged from 1 to 77 (median, 6.2). Median prostate volume was 57cc, and 888/1000 (88%) fractions required plan adaptation. The most common acute GU toxicity was Grade I, 31%; dysuria and acute gastrointestinal toxicity were rare. Three patients required temporary catheterization. Prostate size of over 100cc was associated with acute fatigue, urinary hesitance, and catheter insertion. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) decreased in 99% of patients, and one patient had regional recurrence. Conclusion: MR-guided prostate SBRT shows low acute toxicity and excellent shortterm outcomes. Real-time MRI ensures accurate positioning and SBRT delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To propose a novel magnetic field dose calculation method based on transformation from pencil beam (PB) to Monte Carlo (MC) distribution for MRI-Linac online treatment planning. Methods: The novel magnetic field dose calculation algorithm was established by a PB dose engine and a magnetic field with tissue inhomogeneity influence correction network. The correction network was constructed with a Res-UNet framework, including residual modules and an encoding–decoding path, by inputting three-dimensional PB dose and patient electron density map, and outputting transformed dose distribution. The influences of magnetic fields and tissue heterogeneity were considered and corrected simultaneously in the correction model. A total of 110 clinically treated static beam IMRT plans were collected, including plans for brain, head-and-neck, lung, and rectum cases. A total of 90 cases were used and enhanced to train and validate the model, and the other 20 cases were for test.By comparing the proposed pipeline-generated dose distribution with original input PB dose and corresponding MC dose, the feasibility and effectiveness of the method was evaluated. Results: Results on both beam dose and plan dose accuracy comparisons on all investigated four tumor sites show great consistency between the crossdose-engine transformation generations and the MC results,with averaged plan mean absolute error of 0.90% ± 0.13% for the voxel-wise dose difference and 98.33% ± 1.07% gamma passing rate at the 2%/2 mm criteria. The whole PB calculation and transformation process can be completed within second. Conclusions: We have successfully developed a fast novel magnetic field dose calculation pipeline based on transformation from PB distribution to MC distribution for MRI-Linac online treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the MRI-Linac added value over conventional imageguided radiation therapy (IGRT) in liver tumors Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Materials and methods: We retrospectively compared the Planning Target Volumes (PTVs), the spared healthy liver parenchyma volumes, the Treatment Planning System (TPS) and machine performances, and the patients' outcomes when using either a conventional accelerator (Versa HD®, Elekta, Utrecht, NL) with Cone Beam CT as the IGRT tool or an MR-Linac system (MRIdian®, ViewRay, CA). Results: From November 2014 to February 2020, 59 patients received a SABR treatment (45 and 19 patients in the Linac and MR-Linac group, respectively) for 64 primary or secondary liver tumors. The mean tumor size was superior in the MR-Linac group (37,91cc vs. 20.86cc). PTV margins led to a median 74%- and 60% increase in target volume in Linac-based and MRI-Linac-based treatments, respectively. Liver tumor boundaries were visible in 0% and 72% of the cases when using CBCT and MRI as IGRT tools, respectively. The mean prescribed dose was similar in the two patient groups. Local tumor control was 76.6%, whereas 23.4% of patients experienced local progression (24.4% and 21.1% of patients treated on the conventional Linac and the MRIdian system, respectively). SABR was well tolerated in both groups, and margins reduction and the use of gating prevented ulcerous disease occurrence. Conclusion: The use of MRI as IGRT allows for the reduction of the amount of healthy liver parenchyma irradiated without any decrease of the tumor control rate, which would be helpful for dose escalation or subsequent liver tumor irradiation if needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers' advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR20,10 is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are k Q msr Q 0 f msr f ref , a correction for beam quality and k B → , Q msr f msr , for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for k B → , Q msr f msr are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundWe present our experience with MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for 200 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with minimum 3-month follow-up.MethodsTreatment planning included fusion of the 0.35-Tesla planning MRI with multiparametric MRI and PET-PSMA for Group Grade (GG) 2 or higher and contour review with an expert MRI radiologist. No fiducials or rectal spacers were used. Prescription dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over 2 weeks to the entire prostate with 3-mm margins. Daily plan was adapted if tumor and organs at risk (OAR) doses differed significantly from the original plan. The prostate was monitored during treatment that was automatically interrupted if the target moved out of the PTV range.ResultsMean age was 72 years. Clinical stage was T1c, 85.5%; T2, 13%; and T3, 1.5%. In addition, 20% were GG1, 50% were GG2, 14.5% were GG3, 13% were GG4, and one patient was GG5. PSA ranged from 1 to 77 (median, 6.2). Median prostate volume was 57cc, and 888/1000 (88%) fractions required plan adaptation. The most common acute GU toxicity was Grade I, 31%; dysuria and acute gastrointestinal toxicity were rare. Three patients required temporary catheterization. Prostate size of over 100cc was associated with acute fatigue, urinary hesitance, and catheter insertion. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) decreased in 99% of patients, and one patient had regional recurrence.ConclusionMR-guided prostate SBRT shows low acute toxicity and excellent short-term outcomes. Real-time MRI ensures accurate positioning and SBRT delivery.

ObjectiveTo determine the MRI-Linac added value over conventional image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in liver tumors Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively compared the Planning Target Volumes (PTVs), the spared healthy liver parenchyma volumes, the Treatment Planning System (TPS) and machine performances, and the patients’ outcomes when using either a conventional accelerator (Versa HD®, Elekta, Utrecht, NL) with Cone Beam CT as the IGRT tool or an MR-Linac system (MRIdian®, ViewRay, CA).ResultsFrom November 2014 to February 2020, 59 patients received a SABR treatment (45 and 19 patients in the Linac and MR-Linac group, respectively) for 64 primary or secondary liver tumors. The mean tumor size was superior in the MR-Linac group (37,91cc vs. 20.86cc). PTV margins led to a median 74%- and 60% increase in target volume in Linac-based and MRI-Linac-based treatments, respectively. Liver tumor boundaries were visible in 0% and 72% of the cases when using CBCT and MRI as IGRT tools, respectively. The mean prescribed dose was similar in the two patient groups. Local tumor control was 76.6%, whereas 23.4% of patients experienced local progression (24.4% and 21.1% of patients treated on the conventional Linac and the MRIdian system, respectively). SABR was well tolerated in both groups, and margins reduction and the use of gating prevented ulcerous disease occurrence.ConclusionThe use of MRI as IGRT allows for the reduction of the amount of healthy liver parenchyma irradiated without any decrease of the tumor control rate, which would be helpful for dose escalation or subsequent liver tumor irradiation if needed.

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-Linac systems combine simultaneous MRI with radiation delivery, allowing treatments to be guided by anatomically detailed, real-time images. However, MRI can be degraded by geometric distortions that cause uncertainty between imaged and actual anatomy. In this work, we develop and integrate a real-time distortion correction method that enables accurate real-time adaptive radiotherapy. Materials and methods: The method was based on the pre-treatment calculation of distortion and the rapid correction of intrafraction images. A motion phantom was set up in an MRI-Linac at isocentre (P0), the edge (P1) and just outside (P2) the imaging volume. The target was irradiated and tracked during real-time adaptive radiotherapy with and without the distortion correction. The geometric tracking error and latency were derived from the measurements of the beam and target positions in the EPID images. Results: Without distortion correction, the mean geometric tracking error was 1.3 mm at P1 and 3.1 mm at P2. When distortion correction was applied, the error was reduced to 1.0 mm at P1 and 1.1 mm at P2. The corrected error was similar to an error of 0.9 mm at P0 where the target was unaffected by distortion indicating that this method has accurately accounted for distortion during tracking. The latency was 319 ± 12 ms without distortion correction and 335 ± 34 ms with distortion correction. Conclusions: We have demonstrated a real-time distortion correction method that maintains accurate radiation delivery to the target, even at treatment locations with large distortion.

Beam output checks of a commercial high-field magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy machine can be performed with its on-board megavoltage imager (MVI). This is a fast and efficient method, but only recommended for daily checks. The aim of our study was to show its suitability for weekly checks by investigating its long-term agreement with the golden standard: ionization chamber measurements in a water tank. For one year, the output deviations obtained with both methods were compared. The difference was 0.1 ± 0.3 (1SD) percentage point. This indicated an excellent agreement, and translated into a tolerance level of ± 2 %.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the repeatability of MRI for the purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning by considering the difference in registering MRI to MRI compared to registering CT and MRI.Methods: Fifty patients undergoing radiotherapy planning for gynaecological, prostate, rectal, head and neck and CNS malignancies had a planning CT followed by two T2-weighted MRIs. Anatomical landmarks were contoured on each dataset and the images were rigidly registered. Centre of Mass (COM), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA) were calculated to assess structure volume and position comparing CT-MRI and MRI-MRI.Results: DSC and MDA demonstrated more consistency in delineated volumes for MRI-MRI than for the CT-MRI comparison. The median DSC values were ≥0.8 for 15 of 46 contoured structures for the CT-MRI comparison and 21 of 23 structures for the MRI-MRI comparison. MDA values were ≤1 mm for 11 of 46 structures for the CT-MRI comparison and 18 of 23 structures for the MRI-MRI comparisons. COM were also more consistent between MRI-MRI than between CT-MRI.Conclusion: There was less variability of anatomical structures between repeated MRIs than registered CT and MRI datasets, demonstrating consistency of MRI for volume delineation in radiotherapy planning.

Background: Rotation of the ferromagnetic gantry of a low magnetic field MRI–Linac was previously demonstrated to cause large center frequency offsets of ±400 Hz. The B0 off‐resonances cause image artifacts and imaging isocenter shifts that would preclude MRI‐guided arc therapy. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure and compensate for center frequency offsets in real time during gantry rotation on a 0.35‐T MRI–Linac using a free induction decay (FID) navigator. Methods: A nonselective FID navigator was added before each 2D balanced steady‐state free precession cine image acquisition on a 0.35‐T MRI–Linac. Images were acquired at 7.3 frames per second. Phase data from the initial FID navigator (while the gantry was stationary) was used as a reference. The phase data from each subsequent FID navigator was used to calculate the real‐time B0 off‐resonance. The transmitter/receiver phase and the phase accrual over the adjacent image acquisition were adjusted to correct for the center frequency offset. Measurements were performed using an MRI–Linac dynamic phantom prior to and while the gantry rotated clockwise and counterclockwise. Image quality and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) were compared between uncorrected and B0‐corrected MRIs using a reference image acquired while the gantry was stationary. Four targets in the phantom were manually contoured on the first image frame, and an active contouring algorithm was used retrospectively on each subsequent frame to assess image variations and calculate Dice coefficients. Additionally, three healthy volunteers were imaged using the same pulse sequences with and without real‐time B0 compensation during gantry rotation. Normalized root mean square errors (nRMSEs) were calculated for the phantom and in vivo to assess the efficacy of the B0 compensation on image quality. The measured center frequency offsets from the volunteer and MRI dynamic phantom navigator data were also compared. The sinusoidal behavior of the center frequency offsets was modeled based on the gantry layout and long‐time constant eddy currents resulting from gantry rotation. Results: The duration of the FID navigator and processing was 4.5 ms. The FID navigator resulted in a ≤11% drop in SNR in the phantom and in vivo (liver). Dice coefficients from the MRI‐guided radiation therapy (MR‐IGRT) phantom contour measurements remained above 0.8 with B0 compensation. Without B0 compensation, the Dice coefficients dropped below 0.8 for up to 21% of the time depending on the contour. Real‐time B0 compensation resulted in mean reductions in nRMSE of 51% and 16% for the MR‐IGRT phantom and in vivo, respectively. Peak‐to‐peak center frequency offsets ranged from 757 to 773 Hz in the phantom and 760 to 871 Hz in vivo. Conclusion: Dynamic real‐time B0 compensation significantly improved image quality and reduced artifacts during gantry rotation in the phantom and in vivo. However, the FID navigator resulted in a small drop in the imaging duty cycle and SNR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is known for its accurate soft tissue delineation of tumors and normal tissues. This development has significantly impacted the imaging and treatment of cancers. Radiomics is the process of extracting high-dimensional features from medical images. Several studies have shown that these extracted features may be used to build machine-learning models for the prediction of treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Various feature selection techniques and machine models interrogate the relevant radiomics features for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. This study aims to provide an overview of MRI radiomics features used in predicting clinical treatment outcomes with machine learning techniques. The review includes examples from different disease sites. It will also discuss the impact of magnetic field strength, sample size, and other characteristics on outcome prediction performance.

Magnetic field correction factors are required for performing reference dosimetry on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linear accelerators (MRI-linacs). Methods for measuring magnetic field correction factors usually require specialized equipment and expertise. Our work investigated the use of a microDiamond detector to cross-calibrate an ion chamber between a conventional linac and MRI-linac as a method to measure ion chamber magnetic field correction factors for the MRI-linac. Ratios of the microDiamond and ion chamber were measured on a conventional linac, parallel MRI-linac at 0 T, parallel MRI-linac at 1 T and perpendicular MRI-linac at 1.5 T. The beam quality dependence of the microDiamond was investigated by comparing the measurements on the conventional linac and parallel MRI-linac at 0 T. The magnetic field dependence of the microDiamond was investigated comparing the measurements on a parallel MRI-linac at 0 and 1 T. The ion chamber magnetic field correction factors were calculated by comparing the conventional linac and parallel MRI-linac at 1 T and the conventional linac and perpendicular MRI-linac at 1.5 T for the parallel and perpendicular factors respectively. The FC65-G and PTW30013 ion chambers were investigated. For a parallel MRI-linac, with a beam quality of TPR20,10 = 0.632, we measured magnetic field correction factors of 0.988 ± 0.016 (k = 2) and 0.987 ± 0.016 (k = 2) for a FC65-G and PTW30013 respectively, where k is the coverage factor. For a perpendicular MRI-linac, with a beam quality of TPR20,10 = 0.701, we measured magnetic field correction factors of 0.995 ± 0.020 (k = 2) and 0.983 ± 0.020 (k = 2) for a FC65-G and PTW30013 respectively. The results showed agreement with previously published work which used different approaches. Our work demonstrates the use of a microDiamond to calculate the ion chamber magnetic field correction factor using measurements on a conventional linac and MRI-linac. The high level of uncertainty in our results means the method at present can only be used for validation of magnetic field correction factors.

PurposeTo report our initial experience with 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) linear accelerator (LINAC) in prostate cancer radiotherapy in terms of its use in a radiation oncology clinic.MethodsThe medical records of 14 prostate cancer patients treated with MRI-guided radiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. The fraction time, adapt-to-position (ATP):adapt-to-shape (ATS) usage rate, machine-associated treatment interruption rate, median gamma pass rate, the percentage of planning target volume receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose coverage value of each ATS fraction, the effect of the learning curve on the fraction time and radiation-related acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were evaluated.ResultsFourteen patients have completed their treatment receiving a total of 375 fractions. Six patients (42%) were treated with the moderately hypofractionated regimen, five patients (36%) with conventionally fractionated, and three patients (22%) with the ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens. The ATP : ATS usage ratio was 3:372. The median fraction time was 46 min (range, 24-81 min). For the 3%/3 mm criterion, median gamma pass rate was 99.4% (range, 94.6–100%). Machine-related treatment interruptions were observed in 11 (2.9%) of 375 fractions, but this interruption rate decreased from 4.1% to 0.8%, after an upgrade. Three patients (22%) had gastrointestinal and five patients (36%) had genitourinary toxicity. No ≥grade 3 toxicity was observed.Conclusion1.5 T MRI-LINAC device could be used as a conventional LINAC device, when the conditions of the radiotherapy center are appropriate. MRI-guided prostate radiotherapy is safe and feasible, and high-quality studies with a larger number of patients and long-term results are needed to better evaluate this new technology.

• One of few prospective phase II studies evaluating SBRT with ablative doses. • MRI-guided SBRT is safe and well tolerated. • SBRT can benefit certain patients with LAPC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising new modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT in patients with LAPC (NCT03648632). This prospective single institution phase II study recruited patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after more than two months of combination chemotherapy with no sign of progressive disease. Patients were prescribed 50–60 Gy in 5–8 fractions. Patients were initially treated on a standard linac (n = 4). Since 2019, patients were treated using online magnetic resonance (MR) image-guidance on a 1.5 T MRI-linac, where the treatment plan was adapted to the anatomy of the day. The primary endpoint was resection rate. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between August 2018 and March 2022. All patients had non-resectable disease at time of diagnosis. Median follow-up from inclusion was 28.3 months (95 % CI 24.0-NR). Median progression-free and overall survival from inclusion were 7.8 months (95 % CI 5.0–14.8) and 16.5 months (95 % CI 10.7–22.6), respectively. Six patients experienced grade III treatment-related adverse events (jaundice, nausea, vomiting and/or constipation). One of the initial four patients receiving treatment on a standard linac experienced a grade IV perforation of the duodenum. Six patients (21 %) underwent resection. A further one patient was offered resection but declined. This study demonstrates that SBRT in patients with LAPC was associated with promising overall survival and resection rates. Furthermore, SBRT was safe and well tolerated, with limited severe toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal approach for magnetic resonance imaging-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is currently unknown and needs to consider patient on-couch time constraints. The aim of this study was to compare two different plan optimization approaches. The comparison was performed in 238 clinically applied online-adapted treatment plans from 55 patients, in which the approach of re-optimization was selected based on the physician’s choice. For 33 patients where both optimization approaches were used at least once, the median treatment planning dose metrics of both target and organ at risk differed less than 1%. Therefore, we concluded that beam segment weight optimization was chosen adequately for most patients without compromising plan quality.

This paper describes the imaging performance of a high-field in-line MRI linear accelerator with a patient rotation system in-situ. Signal quality was quantified using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and RF uniformity maps. B0-field inhomogeneity was assessed using magnetic field mapping. SNR was evaluated with various entries into the Faraday cage which were required for extended couch translations. SNR varied between 103 and 87 across PRS rotation angles. Maximum B0-field inhomogeneity corresponded to 0.7 mm of geometric distortion. A 45 × 55 cm2 aperture allowed PRS translation with no reduction in SNR. Imaging performance with the PRS in-situ was found to be acceptable.

Abstract Background The assessment of organ motion is a crucial feature for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Rectal spacer may represent a helpful device in order to outdistance rectal wall from clinical target, but its impact on organ motion is still a matter of debate. MRI-Linac is a new frontier in radiation oncology as it allows a superior visualization of the real-time anatomy of the patient and the current highest level of adaptive radiotherapy. Methods We present data regarding a total of 100 fractions in 20 patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate SBRT for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer with or without spacer. Translational and rotational shifts were computed on the pre- and post-treatment MRI acquisitions referring to the delivery position for antero-posterior, latero-lateral and cranio-caudal direction, and assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test. Results All patients were treated with a five sessions schedule (35 Gy/5fx) using MRI-Linac for a median fraction treatment time of 50 min (range, 46–65). In the entire study sample, median rotational displacement was 0.1° in cranio-caudal, − 0.002° in latero-lateral and 0.01° in antero-posterior direction; median translational shift was 0.11 mm in cranio-caudal, − 0.24 mm in latero-lateral and − 0.22 mm in antero-posterior. A significant difference between spacer and no-spacer patients in terms of rotational shifts in the antero-posterior direction (p = 0.033) was observed; also for translational shifts a positive trend was detected in antero-posterior direction (p = 0.07), although with no statistical significance. We observed statistically significant differences in the pre-treatment planning phase in favor of the spacer cohort for several rectum dose constraints: rectum V32Gy 95% was higher in the spacer cohort compared to the no-spacer one (p = 0.036). Conclusion In our experience, the application of rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate SBRT resulted in a significant impact on rotational antero-posterior shifts contributing to limit prostate intra-fraction motion. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to confirm this ideally favorable effect and to assess any potential impact on clinical outcomes.

• MRI-guided tracking of atrial fibrillation cardiac radioablation targets. • Investigating a cardiac motion compensation technique for cardiac radioablation. • Tracking performance in atrial fibrillation and healthy participants was comparable. • Results of this study warrant the further investigation of this technique. Atrial fibrillation (AF) cardiac radioablation (CR) challenges radiotherapy tracking: multiple small targets close to organs-at-risk undergo rapid differential cardiac contraction and respiratory motion. MR-guidance offers a real-time target tracking solution. This work develops and investigates MRI-guided tracking of AF CR targets with cardiac-induced motion. A direct tracking method (Tracking direct) and two indirect tracking methods leveraging population-based surrogacy relationships with the left atria (Tracking indirect_LA) or other target (Tracking indirect_target) were developed. Tracking performance was evaluated using transverse ECG-gated breathhold MRI images from 15 healthy and 10 AF participants. Geometric and volumetric tracking errors were calculated, defined as the difference between the ground-truth and tracked target centroids and volumes respectively. Transverse, breath-hold, noncardiac-gated cine images were acquired at 4 Hz in 5 healthy and 5 AF participants to qualitatively characterize tracking performance on images more comparable to MRILinac acquisitions. The average 3D geometric tracking errors for Tracking direct , Tracking indirect_LA and Tracking indirect_target respectively were 1.7 ± 1.2 mm, 1.6 ± 1.1 mm and 1.9 ± 1.3 mm in healthy participants and 1.7 ± 1.3 mm, 1.5 ± 1.0 mm and 1.7 ± 1.2 mm in AF participants. For Tracking direct , 88% of analyzed images had 3D geometric tracking errors <3 mm and the average volume tracking error was 1.7 ± 1.3 cc. For Tracking direct on non-cardiac-gated cine images, tracked targets overlapped organsat-risk or completely missed the target area on 2.2% and 0.08% of the images respectively. The feasibility of non-invasive MRI-guided tracking of cardiac-induced AF CR target motion was demonstrated for the first time, showing potential for improving AF CR treatment efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE:Magnetic fields are known to alter radiation dose deposition. Before patients receive treatment using an MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac), preclinical studies are needed to understand the biological consequences of magnetic-field-induced dose effects. In the present study, the authors sought to identify a beam energy and magnetic field strength combination suitable for preclinical murine experiments. METHODS:Magnetic field dose effects were simulated in a mouse lung phantom using various beam energies (225 kVp, 350 kVp, 662 keV [Cs-137], 2 MV, and 1.25 MeV [Co-60]) and magnetic field strengths (0.75, 1.5, and 3 T). The resulting dose distributions were compared with those in a simulated human lung phantom irradiated with a 6 or 8 MV beam and orthogonal 1.5 T magnetic field. RESULTS:In the human lung phantom, the authors observed a dose increase of 45% and 54% at the soft-tissue-to-lung interface and a dose decrease of 41% and 48% at the lung-to-soft-tissue interface for the 6 and 8 MV beams, respectively. In the mouse simulations, the magnetic fields had no measurable effect on the 225 or 350 kVp dose distribution. The dose increases with the Cs-137 beam for the 0.75, 1.5, and 3 T magnetic fields were 9%, 29%, and 42%, respectively. The dose decreases were 9%, 21%, and 37%. For the 2 MV beam, the dose increases were 16%, 33%, and 31% and the dose decreases were 9%, 19%, and 30%. For the Co-60 beam, the dose increases were 19%, 54%, and 44%, and the dose decreases were 19%, 42%, and 40%. CONCLUSIONS:The magnetic field dose effects in the mouse phantom using a Cs-137, 3 T combination or a Co-60, 1.5 or 3 T combination most closely resemble those in simulated human treatments with a 6 MV, 1.5 T MRI-Linac. The effects with a Co-60, 1.5 T combination most closely resemble those in simulated human treatments with an 8 MV, 1.5 T MRI-Linac.

Purpose: To develop and implement an acceptance procedure for the new Elekta Unity 1.5 T MRI‐linac. Methods: Tests were adopted and, where necessary adapted, from AAPM TG106 and TG142, IEC 60976 and NCS 9 and NCS 22 guidelines. Adaptations were necessary because of the atypical maximum field size (57.4 × 22 cm), FFF beam, the non‐rotating collimator, the absence of a light field, the presence of the 1.5 T magnetic field, restricted access to equipment within the bore, fixed vertical and lateral table position, and the need for MR image to MV treatment alignment. The performance specifications were set for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Results: The new procedure was performed similarly to that of a conventional kilovoltage x‐ray (kV) image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) linac. Results were acquired for the first Unity system. Conclusions: A comprehensive set of tests was developed, described and implemented for the MRI‐linac. The MRI‐linac met safety requirements for patients and operators. The system delivered radiation very accurately with, for example a gantry rotation locus of isocenter of radius 0.38 mm and an average MLC absolute positional error of 0.29 mm, consistent with use for SBRT. Specifications for clinical introduction were met. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To report preliminary data on feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. Methods and materials: Between October 2019 and April 2020, twenty consecutive castration sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients were enrolled in an ethical committee approved prospective observational study (Protocol n. XXXX) and treated with PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The mean delivered dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Clinicians reported toxicity was prospectively collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Quality of life (QoL) assessment was performed using EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaires administered at baseline, end of treatment and at first follow-up. Results: Twenty-five lesions in 20 castration sensitive oligorecurrent patients were treated: the most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal (n = 16) and pelvic bone (n = 9). Median PSA-value preMRI guided SBRT was 1.16 ng/mL (range, 0.27–8.9), whereas median PSA value at first follow-up after SBRT was 0.44 ng/mL (range, 0.06–8.15). At first follow-up, for 16 patients showing detectable PSA, PSMA-PET/CT was performed detecting, respectively, in 6 cases partial response and in 10 cases complete response. In the remaining cases, PSA-value was undetectable after SBRT. Radiotherapy treatment was safe and well tolerated according to the PROMs. No acute G2 or higher toxicities were recorded. Conclusions: The current series represent the largest one exploring the feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. The preliminary findings here reported are encouraging in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The hybrid system combining a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner with a linear accelerator (Linac) has become increasingly desirable for tumor treatment because of excellent soft tissue contrast and nonionizing radiation. However, image distortions caused by gradient nonlinearity (GNL) can have detrimental impacts on real‐time radiotherapy using MRI‐Linac systems, where accurate geometric information of tumors is essential. Methods: In this work, we proposed a deep convolutional neural network‐based method to efficiently recover undistorted images (ReUINet) for real‐time image guidance. The ReUINet, based on the encoder‐decoder structure, was created to learn the relationship between the undistorted images and distorted images. The ReUINet was pretrained and tested on a publically available brain MR image dataset acquired from 23 volunteers. Then, transfer learning was adopted to implement the pretrained model (i.e., network with optimal weights) on the experimental three‐dimensional (3D) grid phantom and in‐vivo pelvis image datasets acquired from the 1.0 T Australian MRI‐Linac system. Results: Evaluations on the phantom (768 slices) and pelvis data (88 slices) showed that the ReUINet achieved improvement over 15 times and 45 times on computational efficiency in comparison with standard interpolation and GNL‐encoding methods, respectively. Moreover, qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated that the ReUINet provided better correction results than the standard interpolation method, and comparable performance compared to the GNL‐encoding approach. Conclusions: Validated by simulation and experimental results, the proposed ReUINet showed promise in obtaining accurate MR images for the implementation of real‐time MRI‐guided radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A gadolinium-based perfusion imaging protocol for 0.35 T MRI-Linac was implemented. • Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) and 3DT1-weighted sequences were implemented. • The protocol was evaluated on a flow phantom and two patients with glioblastoma. • Data from patients were acquired at three time points during treatment course on the MRI-Linac. • Changes on DCE and 3DT1w images were in agreement with patients outcomes. MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) systems allow for daily tracking of MRI changes during radiotherapy (RT). Since one common MRI-Linac operates at 0.35 T, there are efforts towards developing protocols at that field strength. In this study we demonstrate the implementation of a post-contrast 3DT1-weighted (3D-T1w) and dynamic contrast-enhancement (DCE) protocol to assess glioblastoma response to RT using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. The protocol implemented was used to acquire 3D-T1w and DCE data from a flow phantom and two patients with glioblastoma (a responder and a non-responder) who underwent RT on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. The detection of post-contrast-enhanced volumes was evaluated by comparing the 3DT1w images from the 0.35 T MRI-Linac to images obtained using a 3 T scanner. The DCE data were tested temporally and spatially using data from a flow phantom and patients. Ktrans maps were derived from DCE at three time points (a week before treatment–Pre RT, four weeks through treatment–Mid RT, and three weeks after treatment–Post RT) and were validated with patients' treatment outcomes. The 3D-T1w contrast-enhancement volumes were visually and volumetrically similar between 0.35 T MRI-Linac and 3 T. DCE images showed temporal stability, and associated Ktrans maps were consistent with patient response to treatment. On average, Ktrans values showed a 54 % decrease and 8.6 % increase for a responder and non-responder respectively when Pre RT and Mid RT images were compared. Our findings support the feasibility of obtaining post-contrast 3D-T1w and DCE data from patients with glioblastoma using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last few years, magnetic resonance image‐guided radiotherapy systems have been introduced into the clinic, allowing for daily online plan adaption. While quality assurance (QA) is similar to conventional radiotherapy systems, there is a need to introduce or modify measurement techniques. As yet, there is no consensus guidance on the QA equipment and test requirements for such systems. Therefore, this report provides an overview of QA equipment and techniques for mechanical, dosimetric, and imaging performance of such systems and recommendation of the QA procedures, particularly for a 1.5T MR‐linac device. An overview of the system design and considerations for QA measurements, particularly the effect of the machine geometry and magnetic field on the radiation beam measurements is given. The effect of the magnetic field on measurement equipment and methods is reviewed to provide a foundation for interpreting measurement results and devising appropriate methods. And lastly, a consensus overview of recommended QA, appropriate methods, and tolerances is provided based on conventional QA protocols. The aim of this consensus work was to provide a foundation for QA protocols, comparative studies of system performance, and for future development of QA protocols and measurement methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The treatment margins for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are often large to cover the tumor excursions resulting from respiration, such that underdosage of the tumor can be avoided. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) tracking can potentially reduce the influence of respiration to allow for smaller treatment margins. However, tracking is accompanied by system latency that may induce residual tracking errors. Alternatively, a simpler mid‐position delivery combined with trailing can be used. Trailing reduces influences of respiration by compensating for baseline motion, to potentially improve target coverage. In this study, we aim to show the feasibility of MRI‐guided tracking and trailing to reduce influences of respiration during lung SBRT. Methods: We implemented MRI‐guided tracking on the MR‐linac using an Elekta research tracking interface to track tumor motion during intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A Quasar MRI4D phantom was used to generate Lujan motion (cos4, 4 s period, 20 mm peak‐to‐peak amplitude) with and without 1.0 mm/min cranial drift. Phantom tumor positions were estimated from sagittal 2D cine‐MRI (4 or 8 Hz) using cross‐correlation‐based template matching. To compensate the anticipated system latency, a linear ridge regression predictor was optimized for online MRI by comparing two predictor training approaches: training on multiple traces and training on a single trace. We created 15‐beam clinical‐grade lung SBRT plans for central targets (8 × 7.5 Gy) and peripheral targets (3 × 18 Gy) with different PTV margins for mid‐position based motion management (3–5 mm) and for MLC tracking (3 mm). We used a film insert with a 3 cm spherical target to measure the spatial distribution and quantity of the delivered dose. A 1%/1 mm local gamma‐analysis quantified dose differences between motion management strategies and reference cases. Additionally, a dose area histogram (DAH) revealed the target coverage relative to the reference scenario. Results: The prediction filter gain was on average 25% when trained on multiple traces and 44% when trained on a single trace. The filter reduced system latency from 313 ± 2 ms to 0 ± 5 ms for 4 Hz imaging and from 215 ± 3 ms to 3 ± 3 ms for 8 Hz. The local gamma analysis for the central delivery showed that tracking improved the gamma pass‐rate from 23% to 96% for periodic motion and from 14% to 93% when baseline drift was applied. For the peripheral delivery during periodic motion, delivery pass‐rates improved from 22% to 93%. Comparing mid‐position delivery to trailing for periodic+drift motion increased the local gamma pass rate from 15% to 98% for a central delivery and from 8% to 98% for a peripheral delivery. Furthermore, the DAHs revealed a relative D98% GTV coverage of 101% and 97% compared to the reference scenario for, respectively, central and peripheral tracking of periodic+drift motion. For trailing, a relative D98% of 99% for central and 98% for peripheral trailing was found. Conclusions: We provided a first experimental demonstration of the technical feasibility of MRI‐guided MLC tracking and trailing for central and peripheral lung SBRT. Tracking maximizes the sparing of healthy tissue, while trailing is highly effective in mitigating baseline motion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: High quality radiotherapy is challenging in cases where multiple targets with independent motion are simultaneously treated. A real‐time tumor tracking system that can simultaneously account for the motion of two targets was developed and characterized. Methods: The multitarget tracking system was implemented on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐linac and utilized multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) tracking to adapt the radiation beam to phantom targets reproducing motion with prostate and lung motion traces. Multitarget tracking consisted of three stages: (a) pretreatment aperture segmentation where the treatment aperture was divided into segments corresponding to each target, (b) MR imaging where the positions of the two targets were localized, and (c) MLC tracking where an updated treatment aperture was calculated. Electronic portal images (EPID) acquired during irradiation were analyzed to characterize geometric uncertainty and tracking latency. Results: Multitarget MLC tracking effectively accounted for the motion of both targets during treatment. The root‐mean‐square error between the centers of the targets and the centers of the corresponding MLC leaves were reduced from 5.5 mm without tracking to 2.7 mm with tracking for lung motion traces and reduced from 4.2 to 1.4 mm for prostate motion traces. The end‐to‐end latency of tracking was measured to be 328 ± 44 ms. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the first experimental implementation of MLC tracking for multiple targets having independent motion. This technology takes advantage of the imaging capabilities of MRI‐linacs and would allow treatment margins to be reduced in cases where multiple targets are simultaneously treated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Unique characteristics of MRI-linac systems and mutual interactions between their components pose specific challenges for their commissioning and quality assurance. The Australian MRI-linac is a prototype system which explores the inline orientation, with radiation beam parallel to the main magnetic field. The aim of this work was to commission the radiation-related aspects of this system for its application in clinical treatments.Methods: Physical alignment of the radiation beam to the magnetic field was fine-tuned and magnetic shielding of the radiation head was designed to achieve optimal beam characteristics. These steps were guided by investigative measurements of the beam properties. Subsequently, machine performance was benchmarked against the requirements of the IEC60976/77 standards. Finally, the geometric and dosimetric data was acquired, following the AAPM Task Group 106 recommendations, to characterize the beam for modeling in the treatment planning system and with Monte Carlo simulations. The magnetic field effects on the dose deposition and on the detector response have been taken into account and issues specific to the inline design have been highlighted.Results: Alignment of the radiation beam axis and the imaging isocentre within 2 mm tolerance was obtained. The system was commissioned at two source-to-isocentre distances (SIDs): 2.4 and 1.8 m. Reproducibility and proportionality of the dose monitoring system met IEC criteria at the larger SID but slightly exceeded it at the shorter SID. Profile symmetry remained under 103% for the fields up to ~34 × 34 and 21 × 21 cm2 at the larger and shorter SID, respectively. No penumbra asymmetry, characteristic for transverse systems, was observed. The electron focusing effect, which results in high entrance doses on central axis, was quantified and methods to minimize it have been investigated.Conclusion: Methods were developed and employed to investigate and quantify the dosimetric properties of an inline MRI-Linac system. The Australian MRI-linac system has been fine-tuned in terms of beam properties and commissioned, constituting a key step toward the application of inline MRI-linacs for patient treatments.

Purpose: Rising evidence suggests that cardiac substructures are highly radiosensitive. However, they are not routinely considered in treatment planning as they are not readily visualized on treatment planning CTs (TPCTs). This work integrated the soft tissue contrast provided by low‐field MRIs acquired on an MR‐linac via image registration to further enable cardiac substructure sparing on TPCTs. Methods: Sixteen upper thoracic patients treated at various breathing states (7 end‐exhalation, 7 end‐inhalation, 2 free‐breathing) on a 0.35T MR‐linac were retrospectively evaluated. A hybrid MR/CT atlas and a deep learning three‐dimensional (3D) U‐Net propagated 13 substructures to TPCTs. Radiation oncologists revised contours using registered MRIs. Clinical treatment plans were re‐optimized and evaluated for beam arrangement modifications to reduce substructure doses. Dosimetric assessment included mean and maximum (0.03cc) dose, left ventricular volume receiving 5Gy (LV‐V5), and other clinical endpoints. As metrics of plan complexity, total MU and treatment time were evaluated between approaches. Results: Cardiac sparing plans reduced the mean heart dose (mean reduction 0.7 ± 0.6, range 0.1 to 2.5 Gy). Re‐optimized plans reduced left anterior descending artery (LADA) mean and LADA0.03cc (0.0–63.9% and 0.0 to 17.3 Gy, respectively). LV0.03cc was reduced by >1.5 Gy for 10 patients while 6 cases had large reductions (>7%) in LV‐V5. Left atrial mean dose was equivalent/reduced in all sparing plans (mean reduction 0.9 ± 1.2 Gy). The left main coronary artery was better spared in all cases for mean dose and D0.03cc. One patient exhibited >10 Gy reduction in D0.03cc to four substructures. There was no statistical difference in treatment time and MU, or clinical endpoints to the planning target volume, lung, esophagus, or spinal cord after re‐optimization. Four patients benefited from new beam arrangements, leading to further dose reductions. Conclusions: By introducing 0.35T MRIs acquired on an MR‐linac to verify cardiac substructure segmentations for CT‐based treatment planning, an opportunity was presented for more effective sparing with limited increase in plan complexity. Validation in a larger cohort with appropriate margins offers potential to reduce radiation‐related cardiotoxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Therapeutic small electron beams are investigated in MRI-linac style magnetic fields. • A comprehensive Monte Carlo framework is established to support the experiments. • Focusing of electron beams & reduced penumbra is observed in inline magnetic fields. • The results motivate investigation of an electron mode in future inline MRI-linacs. In the current era of MRI-linac radiotherapy, dose optimization with arbitrary dose distributions is a reality. For the first time, we present new and targeted experiments and modeling to aid in evaluating the potential dose improvements offered with an electron beam mode during MRI-linac radiotherapy. Small collimated (1 cm diameter and 1.5 × 1.5 cm2 square) electron beams (6, 12 and 20 MeV) from a clinical linear accelerator (Varian Clinac 2100C) are incident perpendicular and parallel to the strong and localized magnetic fields (0–0.7 T) generated by a permanent magnet device. Gafchromic EBT3 film is placed inside a slab phantom to measure two-dimensional dose distributions. A benchmarked and comprehensive Monte Carlo model (Geant4) is established to directly compare with experiments. With perpendicular fields a 5% narrowing of the beam FWHM and a 10 mm reduction in the 15% isodose penetration is seen for the 20 MeV beam. In the inline setup the penumbral width is reduced by up to 20%, and a local central dose enhancement of 100% is observed. Monte Carlo simulations are in agreement with the measured dose distributions (2% or 2 mm). A new range of experiments have been performed to offer insight into how an electron beam mode could offer additional choices in MRI-linac radiotherapy. The work extends on historic studies to bring a successful unified experimental and Monte Carlo modeling approach for studying small field electron beam dosimetry inside magnetic fields. The results suggest further work, particularly on the inline magnetic field scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Combining high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a linear accelerator (Linac) as a single MRI‐Linac system provides the capability to monitor intra‐fractional motion and anatomical changes during radiotherapy, which facilitates more accurate delivery of radiation dose to the tumor and less exposure to healthy tissue. The gradient nonlinearity (GNL)‐induced distortions in MRI, however, hinder the implementation of MRI‐Linac system in image‐guided radiotherapy where highly accurate geometry and anatomy of the target tumor is indispensable. Methods: To correct the geometric distortions in MR images, in particular, for the 1 Tesla (T) MRI‐Linac system, a deep fully connected neural network was proposed to automatically learn the intricate relationship between the undistorted (theoretical) and distorted (real) space. A dataset, consisting of spatial samples acquired by phantom measurement that covers both inside and outside the working diameter of spherical volume (DSV), was utilized for training the neural network, which offers the ability to describe subtle deviations of the GNL field within the entire region of interest (ROI). Results: The performance of the proposed method was evaluated on MR images of a three‐dimensional (3D) phantom and the pelvic region of an adult volunteer scanned in the 1T MRI‐Linac system. The experimental results showed that the severe geometric distortions within the entire ROI had been successfully corrected with an error less than the pixel size. Also, the presented network is highly efficient, which achieved significant improvement in terms of computational efficiency compared to existing methods. Conclusions: The feasibility of the presented deep neural network for characterizing the GNL field deviations in the 1T MRI‐Linac system was demonstrated in this study, which shows promise in facilitating the MRI‐Linac system to be routinely implemented in real‐time MRI‐guided radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The assessment of organ motion is a crucial feature for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Rectal spacer may represent a helpful device in order to outdistance rectal wall from clinical target, but its impact on organ motion is still a matter of debate. MRI-Linac is a new frontier in radiation oncology as it allows a superior visualization of the real-time anatomy of the patient and the current highest level of adaptive radiotherapy.Methods: We present data regarding a total of 100 fractions in 20 patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate SBRT for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer with or without spacer. Translational and rotational shifts were computed on the pre- and post-treatment MRI acquisitions referring to the delivery position for antero-posterior, latero-lateral and cranio-caudal direction, and assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test.Results: All patients were treated with a five sessions schedule (35 Gy/5fx) using MRI-Linac for a median fraction treatment time of 50 min (range, 46-65). In the entire study sample, median rotational displacement was 0.1° in cranio-caudal, - 0.002° in latero-lateral and 0.01° in antero-posterior direction; median translational shift was 0.11 mm in cranio-caudal, - 0.24 mm in latero-lateral and - 0.22 mm in antero-posterior. A significant difference between spacer and no-spacer patients in terms of rotational shifts in the antero-posterior direction (p = 0.033) was observed; also for translational shifts a positive trend was detected in antero-posterior direction (p = 0.07), although with no statistical significance. We observed statistically significant differences in the pre-treatment planning phase in favor of the spacer cohort for several rectum dose constraints: rectum V32Gy < 5% (p = 0.001), V28 Gy < 10% (p = 0.001) and V18Gy < 35% (p = 0.039). Also for bladder V35 Gy < 1 cc, the use of spacer provided a dosimetric advantage compared to the no-spacer subpopulation (p = 0.04). Furthermore, PTV V33.2Gy > 95% was higher in the spacer cohort compared to the no-spacer one (p = 0.036).Conclusion: In our experience, the application of rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate SBRT resulted in a significant impact on rotational antero-posterior shifts contributing to limit prostate intra-fraction motion. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to confirm this ideally favorable effect and to assess any potential impact on clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MR image‐guided radiotherapy has the potential to improve patient care, but integration of an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator adds complexity to the commissioning process. This work describes a single institution experience of commissioning an Elekta Unity MR‐linac, including mechanical testing, MRI scanner commissioning, and dosimetric validation. Mechanical testing included multileaf collimator (MLC) positional accuracy, measurement of radiation isocenter diameter, and MR‐to‐MV coincidence. Key MRI tests included magnetic field homogeneity, geometric accuracy, image quality, and the accuracy of navigator‐triggered imaging for motion management. Dosimetric validation consisted of comparison between measured and calculated PDDs and profiles, IMRT measurements, and end‐to‐end testing. Multileaf collimator positional accuracy was within 1.0 mm, the measured radiation isocenter walkout was 0.20 mm, and the coincidence between MR and MV isocenter was 1.06 mm, which is accounted for in the treatment planning system (TPS). For a 350‐mm‐diameter spherical volume, the peak‐to‐peak deviation of the magnetic field homogeneity was 4.44 ppm and the geometric distortion was 0.8 mm. All image quality metrics were within ACR recommendations. Navigator‐triggered images showed a maximum deviation of 0.42, 0.75, and 3.0 mm in the target centroid location compared to the stationary target for a 20 mm motion at 10, 15, and 20 breaths per minute, respectively. TPS‐calculated PDDs and profiles showed excellent agreement with measurement. The gamma passing rate for IMRT plans was 98.4 ± 1.1% (3%/ 2 mm) and end‐to‐end testing of adapted plans showed agreement within 0.4% between ion‐chamber measurement and TPS calculation. All credentialing criteria were satisfied in an independent end‐to‐end test using an IROC MRgRT phantom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Dynamic dosimaging is a concept whereby a detector in motion is tracked with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to validate the amount and position of dose in a radiation therapy treatment on an MRI‐linac. This work takes steps toward the realization of dynamic dosimaging with the novel high resolution silicon array detector: MagicPlate‐512 (M512). The performance of the M512 was assessed in a 1.0 T inline MRI‐linac, without simultaneous imaging and then during an imaging sequence, both during dosimetry. MR images were acquired to determine the effect of the detector and its components on image quality. Methods: Beam profiles were measured using the M512 on the Australian MRI‐Linac and a comparison made with Gafchromic EBT3 film to investigate any intrinsic magnetic field effects in the silicon. The M512 has 512 sensitive volumes, each 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.037 mm3 in dimension, organized in a two‐dimensional array. Small field sizes up to 4.2 × 3.8 cm2 were investigated in both solid water and then solid lung phantoms. Beam profiles taken at 1.0 T were compared to 0 T conditions, and also to profiles taken during a gradient echo (GRE) imaging sequence. Differences in 80%‐20% penumbral width and full width at half maximum (FWHM) were investigated. Localizer MR images were acquired of the detector adjacent to a water phantom. Results: Good agreement was observed between the M512 and film, with average differences in penumbral width and FWHM of <1 mm in the absence of the imaging sequence. Concurrent imaging widened the penumbra by up to 1.2 mm due to RF noise affecting the detector; film profiles were unchanged. Magnetic resonance images were affected by noise, in particular, due to the large amount of aluminum present, as well as from the USB cable, which acted as an antenna. Unfortunately, due to these issues, suitable dynamic dose imaging was not achieved with the current M512/phantom configuration and the MRI‐linac. However, progress was made toward achieving this goal for future work. Conclusions: The M512 silicon array detector successfully measured high‐resolution beam profiles in agreement with Gafchromic film to within an average of <1 mm on the first MRI‐linac in Australia. More effective noise reduction will be required for the achievement of dynamic dosimaging in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐Linac system combines a MRI scanner and a linear accelerator (Linac) to realize real‐time localization and adaptive radiotherapy for tumors. Given that the Australian MRI‐Linac system has a 30‐cm diameter of spherical volume (DSV) with a shimmed homogeneity of ±4.05 parts per million (ppm), a gradient nonlinearity (GNL) of <5% can only be assured within 15 cm from the system's isocenter. GNL increases from the isocenter and escalates close to and outside of the edge of the DSV. Gradient nonlinearity can cause large geometric distortions, which may provide inaccurate tumor localization and potentially degrade the radiotherapy treatment. In this study, we aimed to characterize and correct the geometric distortions both inside and outside of the DSV. Methods: On the basis of phantom measurements, an inverse electromagnetic (EM) method was developed to reconstitute the virtual current density distribution that could generate gradient fields. The obtained virtual EM source was capable of characterizing the GNL field both inside and outside of the DSV. With the use of this GNL field information, our recently developed "GNL‐encoding" reconstruction method was applied to correct the distortions implemented in the k‐space domain. Results: Both phantom and in vivo human images were used to validate the proposed method. The results showed that the maximal displacements within an imaging volume of 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm after using the fifth‐order spherical harmonic (SH) method and the proposed method were 6.1 ± 0.6 mm and 1.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. Compared with the fifth‐order SH‐based method, the new solution decreased the percentage of markers (within an imaging volume of 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) with ≥1.5‐mm distortions from 6.3% to 1.3%, indicating substantially improved geometric accuracy. Conclusions: The experimental results indicated that the proposed method could provide substantially improved geometric accuracy for the region outside of the DSV, when comparing with the fifth‐order SH‐based method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]