Search

Your search keyword '"MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case)"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Descriptor "MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case)"
4 results on '"MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case)"'

1. ONE TOKE OVER THE (STATE) LINE: CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON "POT TOURISM" RESTRICTIONS.

Author

Denning, Brannon P.

Subjects
MARIJUANA laws, MARIJUANA legalization, PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law), DORMANT commerce clause (Constitutional law), MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case)
Abstract

An essay is presented on the regulation of pot or marijuana tourism in Colorado. Topics discussed include issues related to the legalization of marijuana in Colorado for regulation of pot tourism by visitors from other states, recommendations made by the Amendment 64 Implementation Task Force to limit purchases by state residents for out-of-state visitors, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause. It mentions the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine with reference to case McBurney v. Young.

Published
2014

2. Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause -- State Freedom of Information Laws -- McBurney v. Young.

Subjects
*PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law), *CLAUSES (Law), *FREEDOM of information, *CHILD support laws, *ACTIONS & defenses (Law), *U.S. states, MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case)
Abstract

The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's (USSC's) ruling in the 2013 case McBurney v. Young which deals with state freedom of information laws in America, the legal concept of comity, and the Privileges and Immunities (P&I) Clause which is contained in Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. According to the article, Rhode Island resident Mark McBurney submitted a Virginia Freedom of Information Act request seeking documents about his family and his application for child support.

Published
2013

3. Can a State Restrict the Right to Access Public Records to Its Citizens?

Author

Hudson Jr., David

Subjects
MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case), ACCESS control of public records, ACTIONS & defenses (Law)
Abstract

The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case McBurney v. Young on whether Virginia state precludes citizens of other states from enjoying the same right of access to public records. It notes the petition of Mark McBurney and Roger Hurlbert, residents of Rhode Island and California, respectively, after they are being denied for their requests for public records. The law is based under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the Dormant Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

Published
2013

4. McBurney v. Young.

Author

Graham, Christopher

Subjects
*FREEDOM of information, *PUBLIC records, *INJUNCTIONS, *PRIVILEGES & immunities (Law), MCBURNEY v. Young (Supreme Court case), FREEDOM of Information Act (U.S.)
Published
2013

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results