Search

Explosion venting is a frequently used measure to mitigate the outcome of deflagration in closed environments. Despite the effort to improve engineering formulas and CFD tools used to predict the vent area needed to meet the desired enclosure protection, work has still to be done to reliably predict the outcome of a vented gas explosion. Blind-prediction exercises recently published by the HYSEA project show a large spread in the predictions by engineering models, including semi-empirical correlations and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools. University of Pisa performed experimental tests in a 25 m3 facility in inhomogeneous conditions and with the presence of simple obstacles constituted by plates bolted to HEB beams. The present paper is aimed to share the results of hydrogen dispersion and deflagration tests and discuss the comparison of maximum peak overpressure generated with different blockage ratio and repeated obstacles rows. Description of the experimental setup includes all the details deemed necessary to reproduce the phenomenon with a CFD tool.

University of Pisa performed hydrogen releases and deflagrations in a 1.14 m3 test facility, which shape and dimensions resemble a gas cabinet. Tests were performed for the HySEA project, founded by the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking with the aim to conduct pre-normative research on vented deflagrations in enclosures and containers used for hydrogen energy applications. The test facility, named Small Scale Enclosure (SSE), has a vent area of 0,42 m2 which can host different types of vent; plastic sheet and commercial vent were tested. Realistic levels of congestion are obtained placing a number of gas bottles inside the enclosure. Releases are performed from a buffer tank of a known volume filled with hydrogen at a pressure ranging between 15 and 60 bar. Two nozzles of different diameter and three different release directions were tested, being the nozzle placed at a height where in a real application a leak has the highest probability to occur. Three different ignition locations were investigated as well. This paper is aimed to summarize the main features of the experimental campaign as well as to present its results.

This paper summarises the results from a blind-prediction benchmark study for models used for estimating the consequences of vented hydrogen deflagrations, as well as for users of such models. The work was part of the HySEA project that received funding from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU) under grant agreement no. 671461. The first blind-prediction benchmark exercise in the HySEA project focused on vented explosions with homogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures in 20-foot ISO containers. The scenarios selected for the second blind-prediction study focused on vented deflagrations in inhomogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures resulting from continuous stratification of hydrogen during vertical jet releases inside 20-foot ISO containers. The deflagrations were vented through commercial vent panels located on the roof of the containers. The test program included two configurations and four experiments, i.e. two repeated tests for each scenario. The paper compares experimental results and model predictions and discusses the implications of the findings for safety related to hydrogen applications. Several modellers predicted the stratification of hydrogen inside the container during the release phase with reasonable accuracy. However, there is significant spread in the model predictions, especially for the maximum reduced explosion pressure, and including predictions from different modellers using the same model system. The results from the blind-prediction benchmark studies performed as part of the HySEA project constitute a strong incentive for developers of consequence models to improve their models, implement automated procedures for scenario definition and grid generation, and update training and guidelines for users of the models. publishedVersion

Vented deflagrations are one of the most challenging phenomenon to be replicated numerically in order to predict its resulting pressure time history. As a matter of fact a number of different phenomena can contribute to modify the burning velocity of a gas mixture undergoing a deflagration, especially when the flame velocity is considerably lower than the speed of sound. In these conditions acceleration generated by both the flow field induced by the expanding flame and from discontinuities, as the vent opening and the venting of the combustion products, affect the burning velocity and the burning behavior of the flame. In particular the phenomena affecting the pressure time history of a deflagration after the flame front reaches the vent area, such as flame acoustic interaction and local pressure peaks, seem to be closely related to a change in the burning behavior induced by the venting process. Flame acoustic interaction and local pressure peaks arise as a consequence of the change in the burning behavior of the flame. This paper discuss the analysis of the video recording of the flame front produced during the TP experimental campaign, performed by UNIPI in the project HySEA, to describe qualitatively the contribution of the generated flow field in a vented deflagration and its influence in the peaks of the pressure-time history.

University of Pisa (UNIPI) conducted a series of vented deflagration tests at B. Guerrini Laboratory. The tests were part of the experimental campaign performed by UNIPI for the European HySEA project (Hydrogen Safety for Energy Applications). Experiments included homogeneous hydrogen-air mixture contained in an about 1 m3 enclosure, called SSE (Small Scale Enclosure). The mixture concentration was variable between 10% and 18% vol. During the deflagrations, structural response was investigated by measuring the displacement of a test plate. The collected data were used to validate the FE model developed by IMPETUS Afea. In this paper experimental facility, displacement measurement system and FE model are briefly described, then comparison between experimental data and simulation results is discussed.

Experiments were carried out inside a 25 m3 vented combustion test facility (CVE) with a fixed vent area sealed by a plastic sheet vent. Inside the CVE, a 0.64 m3 open vent box, called RED-CVE was placed. The vent of the RED-CVE was left open and three different vent area were tested. Two different mixing fans, one for each compartment, were used to establish homogeneous H2 concentrations. This study examined H2 concentrations in the range between 8.5% vol. to 12.5% vol. and three different ignition locations, (1) far vent ignition, (2) inside the RED-CVE box ignition and (3) near vent ignition (the vent refers to the CVE vent). Peak overpressures generated inside the test facility and the smaller compartment were measured. The results indicate that the near vent ignition generates negligible peak overpressures inside the test facility as compared to those originated by far vent ignition and ignition inside the RED-CVE box. The experiments with far vent ignition showed a pressure increase with increasing hydrogen concentration which reached a peak value at 11% vol. concentration and then decreased showing a non-monotonic behaviour. The overpressure measured inside the RED-CVE was higher when the ignition was outside the box whereas the flame entered the box through the small vent.

Explosion relief panels or doors are often used in industrial buildings to reduce damages caused by gas explosions. Decades of research have contributed to the understanding of the phenomena involved in gas explosions in order to establish an effective method to predict reliably the explosion overpressure. All the methods predict a monotonic increase of the overpressure with the concentration of the gas in the range from the lower explosion limit to the stoichiometric one. Nevertheless, in few cases, a non-monotonic behaviour of the maximum developed pressure as a function of hydrogen concentration was reported in the literature. The non-monotonic behaviour was also observed during experimental tests performed at the Scalbatraio laboratory at the University of Pisa, in a 25 m3 vented combustion test facility, with a vent area of 1,12 m2. This paper presents the results obtained during the tests and investigates the possible explanations of the phenomena.

Explosion relief panels or doors are often used in industrial buildings to reduce damages caused by a gas explosion. Decades of research produced a significant contribution to the understanding of the phenomena involved. Among the aspects that need further research, interactions between acoustic oscillations and the flame front is one of the most important. Interactions between the flame front and acoustic oscillations has raised technical problems in lots of combustion applications as well and has been studied theoretically and experimentally in such cases. Pressure oscillations have been observed in vented deflagrations and in certain cases they are responsible for the highest pressure peak generated during the event. At Scalbatraio laboratory of Pisa University a test facility (CVE) was built in order to investigate vented hydrogen deflagrations. This paper presents an overview of the results obtained during several experimental campaigns. The tests are analysed with the focus on the investigation of flame acoustic interaction phenomena. Qualitative and quantitative analysis is presented and the generated possible physical phenomena are investigated.

The purpose of the experimental work described in this paper is the determination of the ventilation requirements in enclosures containing fuel cells such that, in the case of a small non catastrophic release, the H2 concentration in air for zone 2 ATEX (2% v/v) is not exceeded. A full scale fuel cell was placed inside the experimental facility having 25 m3 volume. Three different leaks were investigated (40, 90 and 180 Nlt/min) and H2 concentrations were measured at five locations inside the facility. Several vent areas were examined for the cases of natural ventilation. When natural ventilation failed to ensure H2 concentrations less than 2% v/v in the facility, mechanical ventilation using two fans was investigated. Based on the experimental set up, it was found that natural ventilation is sufficient when the air-flow calculated from ATEX guidelines is higher than 0.009 m3/s and the release flow rate corresponds to a non-catastrophic release, i.e. 40 Nlt/min. For higher release flow rates most of the ventilation configurations were not sufficient to maintain a H2 concentration less than 2% v/v. All forced ventilation configurations examined (together with the free ventilation areas used) were sufficient to maintain a H2 concentration below 2% v/v for 40 Nlt/min and 90 Nlt/min release flow rates. For the higher release flow rate of 180 Nlt/min, most of the forced ventilation configurations were insufficient.

At the DIMNP (Department of Mechanical, Nuclear and Production Engineering) laboratories of University of Pisa (Italy) a pilot plant called HPBT (Hydrogen Pipe Break Test) was built in cooperation with the Italian Fire Brigade Department. The apparatus consists of a 12 m3 tank connected with a 50 m long pipe. At the far end of the pipeline a couple of flanges have been used to house a disc with a hole of the defined diameter. The plant has been used to carry out experiments of hydrogen release. During the experimental activity, data have been acquired about the gas concentration and the length of release as function of internal pressure and release hole diameter. The information obtained by the experimental activity will be the basis for the development of a new specific normative framework arranged to prevent fire and applied to hydrogen. This study is focused on hydrogen concentration as function of wind velocity and direction. Experimental data have been compared with theoretical and computer models (such as CFD simulations).

Within the framework of the internal project HyQRA of the HYSAFE Network of Excellence (NoE), funded by the European Commission (EC), the participating partners were requested to apply their Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) methodologies on a predefined hypothetical gaseous H2 refuelling station named BBC (Benchmark Base Case). The overall aim of the HyQRA project was to perform an inter-comparison of the various QRA approaches and to identify the knowledge gaps on data and information needed in the QRA steps specifically related to H2. Partners NCSRD and UNIPI collaborated on a common QRA. UNIPI identified the hazards on site, selected the most critical ones, defined the events that could be the primary cause of an accident and provided to NCSRD the scenarios listed in risk order for the evaluation of the consequences. NCSRD performed the quantitative analysis using the ADREA-HF CFD code. The predicted risk assessment parameters (flammable H2 mass and volume time histories and maximum horizontal and vertical distances of the LFL from the source) were provided to UNIPI to analyze the consequences and to evaluate the risk and distances of damage. In total 15 scenarios were simulated. Five of them were H2 releases in confined ventilated spaces (inside the compression and the purification/drying buildings). The remaining 10 scenarios were releases in open/semi-confined spaces (in the storage cabinet, storage bank and refuelling hose of one dispenser). This paper presents the CFD methodology applied for the quantitative analysis of the common UNIPI/NCSRD QRA and discusses the results obtained from the performed calculations.

There are currently projects and demonstration programs aiming at introducing Hydrogen powered Fuel Cell (HFC) vehicles into the market. Regione Toscana has been cofounder of the project “H2 Filiera Idrogeno”, whose goal is to achieve a clean and sustainable mobility through HFC vehicle studies covering their production, storage and use. Among the goals of the project was the substitution of the electric propulsion system with a hydrogen fuel cells propulsion system. This work presents a brief overview of the necessary modifications of the electric propulsion version of a Piaggio Porter to host a H 2 fuel cell and experimental studies of realistic H 2 releases from the vehicle. The scenarios covered H 2 unintended releases underneath the vehicle when at rest and focused on three types of releases, diffusive, major and minor, that might reach the interior of the vehicle and potentially pose a direct risk to the passengers.

A numerical and experimental investigation of a system for the micro-cogeneration of heat and power, based on a Stirling cycle and equipped with a flameless burner, is carried out with the purpose of evaluating the system performances with hydrogen-enriched fuels. The numerical model of the combustion chamber gave significant insight concerning the analysis and interpretation of the experimental measurements; however it required considerable efforts, especially regarding the definition of proper boundary conditions. In particular a subroutine was developed in order to couple the oxidation process to the overall operation of the micro-cogeneration unit. This procedure was proved to perform satisfactory, providing values of the heat source for the Stirling cycle that lead to expected thermal efficiencies in agreement with those indicated in the literature for similar systems. The importance of a proper turbulence-chemistry interaction treatment and rather detailed kinetic schemes to capture flameless combustion was also assessed. A simple NO formation mechanism based on the thermal and prompt routes was found to provide NO emissions in relatively good agreement with experimental observations when applied on thermo-fluid dynamic fields obtained from detailed oxidation schemes.

This paper was presented at the Seventh International Conference of Hydrogen Safety (ICHS 2017) in Hamburg on 11-13 September 2017. The paper summarises the results from a blind-prediction study for models developed for estimating the consequences of vented hydrogen deflagrations. The work is part of the project Improving hydrogen safety for energy applications through pre-normative research on vented deflagrations (HySEA). The scenarios selected for the blind-prediction entailed vented explosions with homogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures in a 20-foot ISO container. The test program included two configurations and six experiments, i.e. three repeated tests for each scenario. The comparison between experimental results and model predictions reveals reasonable agreement for some of the models, and significant discrepancies for others. It is foreseen that the first blind-prediction study in the HySEA project will motivate developers to improve their models, and to update guidelines for users of the models. The paper is a deliverable from the project “Improving hydrogen safety for energy applications through pre-normative research on vented deflagrations”, or HySEA (www.hysea.eu), which receives funding from the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU) under grant agreement no. 671461. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and Norway.