Search

The purpose of this study was to provide an account of the 5-year experience we have gained using holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) lasertripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones. One-hundred thirty-seven transurethral ureterolithotripsies were performed in 131 patients. A Ho:YAG laser device, fibres with diameters of 360 and 550 mum, a video camera as well as semi-rigid and flexible ureterorenoscopes were used. Results showed that the direct success rates-which meant stone-free ureters on the first post-operative day-in the upper, middle and lower ureters were 84.6, 88.7 and 94.8%, respectively. The final success rates--which meant stone-free ureters 4 weeks after the operation without a second intervention--were 84.6, 96.7 and 96.7%, respectively. The pulsatile Ho:YAG laser beam fragmented all kinds of stones easily. No ureteral stricture or reflux was identified during the follow-up period. The advantages of Ho lasertripsy outweighed its disadvantages. Based on our experience, the Ho:YAG laser is one of the most effective and safest energy sources in the treatment of ureteral calculi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with outlet obstruction, the contraction of the base is reduced compared to that of healthy individuals, while the contraction of the dome is not affected. Here, we investigated the cellular mechanisms that might be responsible for cholinergic effects blocking non-adrenergic non-cholinergic contractions in the base of the urinary bladder. Smooth muscle cells either from the base or from the dome of human urinary bladders were cultured to determine the contribution of cholinergic and purinergic mechanisms to their Ca2+ homeostasis. While ATP evoked Ca2+ transients in all the cells, nicotine and carbachol induced Ca2+ transients only in 56% and 44% of the cells, respectively. When ATP was administered together with nicotine or carbachol, the amplitudes of the Ca2+ transients recorded from cells prepared from the base of bladders were significantly smaller (42 ± 6% with nicotine and 56 ± 9% with carbachol) than those evoked by ATP alone. This inhibition was much less apparent in the dome of bladders. The inhibition between the cholinergic and purinergic signaling pathways reported in this work may decrease the strength of the contraction of the base of the urinary bladder in patients with outlet obstruction during voiding.

The authors report a rare case of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy of 2 ureteral stones. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment of the renal stone was performed. The stone was crushed into 2 pieces, with 1 of them located in the upper part, and the other in the middle part of the ureter. Further SWL treatments and ureteroscopy were unsuccessful. The authors then decided to perform a percutaneous ureterolithotomy. In conclusion, percutaneous ureterolithotomy is a good choice of treatment, when ureteral stones cannot be removed by SWL or ureteroscopy.

The authors developed a new, minimally invasive technique for the removal of impacted iuxtavesical ureteral stones, using nephroscope and a grasping forceps. They named this technique ostiolitholapaxy. The authors present their detailed technique and results. Between 1. 1. 1995 and 31. 12. 2006 48 operations were performed. In 41 cases the stones were removed successfully. In seven unsuccessful cases the stones were extracted by ureteroscopy. The authors worked up 41 successful cases presenting the steps and technical details of the procedure. Average stone size was 5,2 (3-12) mm. Male and female ratio was 23/18. In 19 patients local and in 22 patients spinal anaesthesia was performed. Among the patients who underwent local anaesthesia there were 13 (68,4%) female and 6 (31,6%) male patients. Average operating time was 8,5 (3,5-35) minutes. Mean follow-up time was 95,3 (2-143) months. The success rate of the procedure was 85,41%. There were no intraoperative complications. In the mentioned period no ureteral stricture and/or reflux-uropathy has developed. Due to the simplicity, efficacy of this technique and the fact that it can be performed even in local anaesthesia, this procedure can be useful in case of small symptomatic iuxtavesical stones as a quick and safe stone removal intervention.

Percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is not a well-known method for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones. The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectiveness of this procedure to ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral calculi. Impacted ureteral stones were removed in 93 patients by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients, ureteroscopy was performed for the treatment of the ureteral stones (Group 2). The same instruments were used to carry out percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy as were used for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. During these interventions, a direct percutaneous puncture and extraction of the stones was performed. The average diameter of the stones was 11 +/- 4 mm in Group 1 and 7 +/- 2 mm in Group 2. The average operating time was 32 +/- 11 minutes in Group 1 and 41 +/- 29 minutes in Group 2. The average duration of hospitalization following the operations was 7.2 +/- 3.1 days in Group 1 and 3.5 +/- 2.5 days in Group 2. In Group 1, the average time of the operations was significantly lower (p 0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p < 0.001), compared to Group 2. In Group 1, retroperitoneal hematoma occurred in 1 patient and prolonged urine leakage was detected in 2 cases, whereas in Group 2, pyelonephritis occurred in 5 patients following the operation. In conclusion, the operating time of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is shorter and the rate of complications comparable with that of ureteroscopy. Percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is suggested for the removal of impacted ureteral stones instead of open surgical ureterolithotomy.