1. How to Obtain Valid Inference under Unit Nonresponse?
- Author
-
Boeschoten, Laura, Vink, Gerko, Hox, Joop J.C.M., Leerstoel Heijden, Leerstoel Hox, Methodology and statistics for the behavioural and social sciences, Leerstoel Heijden, Leerstoel Hox, Methodology and statistics for the behavioural and social sciences, and Department of Methodology and Statistics
- Subjects
Statistics and Probability ,Computer science ,Inference ,coverage ,mass imputation ,computer.software_genre ,Weighting ,01 natural sciences ,Auxiliary variables ,010104 statistics & probability ,Statistics ,050602 political science & public administration ,Statistics::Methodology ,Imputation (statistics) ,0101 mathematics ,sample imputation ,Statistics::Applications ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Usability ,Probability and statistics ,Data structure ,HA1-4737 ,0506 political science ,Register data ,Data mining ,business ,computer - Abstract
Weighting methods are commonly used in situations of unit nonresponse with linked register data. However, several arguments in terms of valid inference and practical usability can be made against the use of weighting methods in these situations. Imputation methods such as sample and mass imputation may be suitable alternatives, as they lead to valid inference in situations of item nonresponse and have some practical advantages. In a simulation study, sample and mass imputation were compared to traditional weighting when dealing with unit nonresponse in linked register data. Methods were compared on their bias and coverage in different scenarios. Both, sample and mass imputation, had better coverage than traditional weighting in all scenarios. Imputation methods can therefore be recommended over weighting as they also have practical advantages, such as that estimates outside the observed data distribution can be created and that many auxiliary variables can be taken into account. The use of sample or mass imputation depends on the specific data structure.
- Published
- 2017