Search

International audience; Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, the FLOWER-MI trial found no significant clinical benefit to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to angiography-guided PCI. Aims: Our aim was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of FFR-guided PCI, the secondary endpoint of the FLOWER-MI trial. Methods: Costs, major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and unplanned hospitalisation leading to urgent revascularisation), and quality-adjusted life years were calculated in both groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were estimated. Uncertainty was explored by probabilistic bootstrapping. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the health care provider with a time horizon of one year. Results: At one year, the average cost per patient was 7,560 euro (+/- 2,218) in the FFR-guided group and 7,089 euro (+/- 1,991) in the angiography-guided group (p-value

Le choc cardiogénique (CC) se définit comme une hypoperfusion des organes secondaire à une altération du débit cardiaque. Il correspond à une forme sévère d’insuffisance cardiaque le plus souvent aigue dont la principale étiologie reste l’infarctus du myocarde, mais les causes non-ischémiques sont désormais prédominantes (50-60% des CC). Sa physiopathologie classique associe une dysfonction myocardique systolo-diastolique, une congestion pulmonaire et veineuse, et un syndrome de réponse inflammatoire et systémique, mais il existe de nombreuses formes limites ou mixtes avec euvolémie et/ou vasoplégie au premier plan. Ainsi, il est nécessaire de revoir la définition usuelle du CC et son approche diagnostique positive et étiologique afin de pouvoir intégrer ces différentes présentations et évolutions. Les différentes définitions disponibles permettent soit d’améliorer la sensibilité diagnostique du CC en se basant sur des critères clinico-biologiques et d’imagerie facilement accessibles permettant ainsi son diagnostic rapide (définition FRENSHOCK), soit intègrent le concept d’évolution du CC permettant de stratifier son pronostic (définition SCAI) guidant ainsi l’adaptation du niveau d’invasivité de la prise en charge du CC. Une meilleure diffusion de ces définitions devrait permettre d’harmoniser la prise en charge tant d’un point de vue clinique que de la recherche, et ainsi permettre une amélioration du pronostic de ces patients.

Background We aimed to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection referred for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the peak of the pandemic in France. Methods We included all consecutive patients referred for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTEMI during the first 3 weeks of April 2020 in 5 university hospitals (Paris, south and north of France), all performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results The study included 237 patients (67±14, 69% of male), 116 (49%) with STEMI and 121 (51%) with NSTEMI. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 associated ACS was 11% (n=26) and 11 patients had severe hypoxemia on presentation (mechanical ventilation or nasal oxygen >6L/min). Patients were comparable regarding medical history and risk factors, except a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus in SARS-CoV-2 patients (53.8% vs 25.6%, p=0.003). In SARS-CoV-2 patients, cardiac arrest on admission was more frequent (26.9% vs. 6.6%, p, In this registry we included patients presenting with ACS during the first pic of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France. ACS in SARS-CoV-2 patients presented with high percentage of cardiac arrest on admission, high incidence of no-reflow and high in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed in order to elucidate the mechanisms and the optimal management of coronary thrombosis in SARS-CoV- 2 patients.

Resumen Los sindromes coronarios agudos estan vinculados en la gran mayoria de los casos a la ruptura de una placa ateromatosa que inicia la activacion y luego la agregacion plaquetaria que conduce al desarrollo de un trombo coronario mas o menos oclusivo. La prevencion de las recidivas isquemicas en los pacientes de riesgo se basa en gran medida en el uso de antiagregantes plaquetarios, agentes farmacologicos que inhiben la activacion de las plaquetas o, en raras ocasiones, directamente su agregacion. La presencia de una enfermedad coronaria requiere el uso de uno o incluso dos antiagregantes. Por ejemplo, a un paciente que se someta a una angioplastia coronaria y/o que haya tenido un sindrome coronario agudo se le prescribira una doble terapia compuesta por aspirina (que inhibe la activacion de las plaquetas por la via de la ciclooxigenasa) y un inhibidor del receptor P2Y12 del difosfato de adenosina. Este ultimo puede ser clopidogrel, prasugrel o ticagrelor. Estas dos ultimas moleculas han demostrado su superioridad sobre el clopidogrel en pacientes con sindrome coronario agudo, pero a costa de un mayor riesgo de episodios hemorragicos. Las hemorragias (digestivas, intracraneales, etc.) son las principales reacciones adversas asociadas a los agentes antiplaquetarios. Deben buscarse en el paciente en tratamiento, pero sobre todo deben anticiparse. Uno de los principales desafios de la cardiologia moderna es determinar los riesgos isquemicos/tromboticos y hemorragicos de cada paciente coronario para ajustar la intensidad del tratamiento antiplaquetario (numero y potencia de los agentes antiagregantes), asi como la duracion del tratamiento a los perfiles encontrados; ahora es el momento mas oportuno para el tratamiento personalizado.

International audience; Cardiogenic shock is a complex clinical entity associated with very high mortality and intensive resource utilization. Despite the widespread use of timely reperfusion and appropriate pharmacotherapy, the survival rate remains at around 50%. Recently, percutaneous axial flow pumps have been integrated into the therapeutic spectrum of cardiogenic shock management. However, most of the literature supporting their use stems from observational studies. To date, attempts to perform randomized controlled trials with percutaneous axial flow pumps have failed. This underlines the challenge of performing a well-conducted randomized controlled trial that provides the highest level of evidence. Such a trial is warranted, because percutaneous axial flow pumps are costly, and are associated with serious complications. The major pitfalls of previous studies were lack of standardized cardiogenic shock definitions according to clinical severity, inappropriate patient and device selection, lack of standardized trial endpoints and high rates of crossovers; these issues must be carefully considered and evaluated. In light of recent trial failures, we aim to summarize the challenges associated with performing randomized controlled trials of percutaneous axial flow pumps in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and to suggest potential means of overcoming them.; Le choc cardiogénique reste une entité clinique complexe associée avec une très haute mortalité et une utilisation intensive de ressource. Malgré la généralisation de la reperfusion précoce et un traitement adapté, le taux de mortalité reste élevée aux alentours de 50 %. Les pompes axiales percutanées ont été récemment intégrées dans l’arsenal thérapeutique du choc cardiogénique. Cependant, la plupart des données de la littérature en faveur de leur utilisation sont de natures observationnelles. À ce jour, les tentatives de réaliser les études cliniques randomisées ont été des échecs. Cela souligne à quel point il reste compliqué de réaliser une étude randomisée bien conduite afin de fournir un niveau de preuve suffisant. Une telle étude est nécessaire car les pompes axiales sont coûteuses et associées avec des complications sérieuses. L’absence de définition standardisée du choc cardiogénique en fonction de sa gravité, une mauvaise sélection des patients ou des interventions, l’absence de critère de jugement validé et le fort taux de crossover sont parmi les écueils majeurs de la réalisation des précédentes études et doivent être prise en compte pour la réalisation des prochaines. À la lumière des échecs récents, nous avons voulu résumer les écueils pour la réalisation d’une étude randomisée utilisant les pompes microaxiales dans le choc cardiogénique secondaire à un IDM et suggérer des voies potentielles de résolution.

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare a delayed and a very early invasive strategy in patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) without pre-treatment. Background The optimal delay of the invasive strategy in patients with NSTE-ACS remains debated and has never been investigated in patients not pre-treated with P2Y12–adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists. Methods A prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Altogether, 741 patients presenting with intermediate- or high-risk NSTE-ACS intended for an invasive strategy were included. The modified intention-to-treat analysis was composed of 709 patients after 32 withdrew consent. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the delayed invasive group (DG) (n = 363) with coronary angiography (CA) performed 12 to 72 h after randomization or the very early invasive group (EG) (n = 346) with CA within 2 h. No pre-treatment with a loading dose of a P2Y12–adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist was allowed before CA. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and recurrent ischemic events at 1 month, as determined by a blinded adjudication committee. Results Most patients had high-risk NSTE-ACS in both groups (93% in the EG vs. 92.5% in the DG). The median time between randomization and CA was 0 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 0 to 1 h) in the EG group and 18 h (IQR: 11 to 23 h) in the DG. The primary endpoint rate was significantly lower in the EG (4.4% vs. 21.3% in the DG; hazard ratio: 0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.34; p Conclusions Without pre-treatment, a very early invasive strategy was associated with a significant reduction in ischemic events at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NSTE-ACS. (Early or Delayed Revascularization for Intermediate and High-Risk Non ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT02750579)

International audience

International audience; Background. - Historical cohorts have shown extent of coronary artery disease to be a predictor of poorer outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, contemporary data in the era of reperfusion and modern secondary prevention therapy are lacking.Aim. - To compare 3-year survival in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease versus those with single-vessel disease.Methods. - Using data from the FAST-MI 2005, 2010 and 2015 registries, three nationwide French surveys, we included all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours of symptom onset. Baseline characteristics, management and 3-year all-cause mortality were analysed according to coronary status (single-, two- and three-vessel disease).Results. - Among 3907 patients (mean age 62.4 +/- 13.7 years; 75.9% male), patients with multivessel disease (two- or three-vessel disease) accounted for 47.9%; overall, they were older, with higher cardiovascular risk profiles. In a multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model, only patients with three-vessel disease had a higher rate of mortality at 3 years compared with those with single-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.68-2.26; P < 0.001). Finally, patients with multivessel disease with complete myocardial revascularization before discharge had a similar prognosis to patients with single-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.64; P = 0.35).Conclusions. - Multivessel disease still represents an important proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Although three-vessel disease is associated with higher 3-year mortality, patients with multivessel disease and complete myocardial revascularization in the contemporary era have a 3-year risk of death similar to that in patients with single-vessel disease.

International audience; Background: If several randomized studies allowed to better apprehend what should be the best antithrombotic strategy in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF), there are still several clinical situations with a gap of evidence.Methods: We conducted a national French survey in September-October 2020 among cardiologists in order to assess what are daily practices regarding the antithrombotic management in several specific clinical settings where no or little scientific evidence is available. The questionnaires were built by a committee of 6 cardiologists routinely involved in the field of CAD and/or AF.Results: Among the 6388 French cardiologists, 483 (7.6%) cardiologists participated to the survey. The rate of participation was rather homogeneous across the country. The mean age of participants was 48 +/- 12.7. There were 134 women (27.7%) and 349 men. Altogether, 181 (37.5%) cardiologists worked in private, 153 (31.7%) in non-universitary public and 83 (17.2%) in universitary public centers. The remaining had shared activity. Among the participants, 150 were interventional (coronary) cardiologists (31.1%). Others were general cardiologists (n = 229), specialists in the field of rhythmology (n = 43), heart failure (n = 17) or imaging (n = 44). The survey consisted of 10 questions pertaining to 2 virtual clinical scenarios.Conclusions: The present survey is an illustration of how therapeutic decisions may vary in such situations with little or no scientific evidence. Such surveys may help experts to build consensus (answers with little variability) and to target the need for future trials and more research (answers with a lot of variability).

Objectives To analyze the characteristics and outcome of Impella mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for Takotsubo syndrome (TS) with cardiogenic shock. Background TS is an acute heart failure syndrome characterized by transient severe reduction of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, with cardiogenic shock occurring in around 10% of patients. Since inotropes should be avoided due to their role in TS pathogenesis and aggravation of LV outflow tract obstruction, the use of MCS as treatment is a viable treatment option, however, studies are lacking. Methods The catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) registry and local MCS databases were screened for TS patients with cardiogenic shock (TS-CS) supported with an Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD). Patient and treatment characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results At 10 US and European centers, 16 TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD were identified between December 2013 and May 2018 (mean age, 61.8 ± 15.5 years; 87.5% women). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at presentation was severely reduced (mean, 19.4 ± 8.3%). Prior to MCS, 13 patients (81.3%) were mechanically ventilated, 4 patients (25.0%) had been resuscitated, and mean serum lactate was 4.7 ± 3.5 mmol/L. Mean duration of Impella support was 1.9 ± 1.0 days (range, 1–4 days). Thirteen patients (81.3%) survived to discharge, and all survivors experienced cardiac recovery with significant improvement of LVEF at discharge compared to baseline (20.4 ± 8.8 vs. 52.9 ± 12.0, P Conclusions This is the first series of TS-CS patients supported with an Impella pVAD. Mortality was low, and LV systolic function recovered in all survivors. Prospective studies of Impella support in this special condition are warranted.

International audience; Background Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered unsuitable for a lifelong oral anticoagulant regimen. Recently, a single-centre study reported device-related thrombus formation in 16.7% of patients treated with the second-generation Amulet device (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), presenting a potential major safety concern. As "real-world" data on device-related thrombus formation following LAAO with the Amulet occluder are scarce, we aimed to evaluate this outcome in a retrospective registry.Methods Clinical and tranosesophageal echocardiography data after LAAO with the Amulet in consecutive patients from three centres were collated.Results Among 38 patients (mean age 75.8 years), mean (standard deviation) CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.4 (1.2) and 3.4 (0.9), respectively. All patients underwent successful device placement without procedure-related adverse events. The antithrombotic regimen at discharge consisted of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in 27 patients (71.1%), single antiplatelet therapy in 10 patients (26.3%), and no antithrombotic therapy in one patient (2.6%). Device-related thrombus was observed in one patient (2.6%) despite DAFT regimen. The outcome of this patient was uncomplicated after adjustment of oral anticoagulant therapy. No patients presented with a thromboembolic event following LAAO during a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 15 (5) months.Conclusions In this retrospective study, device-related thrombus formation with the second-generation Amulet device was rare and occurred at a rate similar to that of the previous device. Importantly, no patient experienced a device-related thromboembolic event during follow-up. Larger real-life studies are required to confirm the safety profile of this increasingly used device.

Cardiogenic shock is a highly lethal syndrome, leading to rapid death or secondary multiorgan damage, but current shock therapies, including mechanical support devices, also have a significant side effect profile. The overarching goal of shock therapy is ensuring long-term survival with good quality of life. This implies averting death, modifying the disease course by promoting heart recovery and avoiding additional cardiac damage, protecting other organs, and circumventing complications. Monitoring and supportive therapies are subordinate to these goals. Rather than merely following preconceived notions, the rapid evolution in mechanical support technology requires iterative and critical review of the benefits of current procedures, protocols and drugs in view of their overall contribution to the therapeutic goals. This article discusses various monitoring and supportive pharmaceutical modalities typically used in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical support.

International audience; Elderly patients represent a growing proportion of the acute coronary syndrome population in Western countries. However, their frequent atypical symptoms at presentation often lead to delays in management and to misdiagnosis. Furthermore, their prognosis is poorer than that of younger patients because of physiological changes in platelet function, haemostasis and fibrinolysis, but also a higher proportion of comorbidities and frailty, both of which increase the risk of recurrent thrombotic and bleeding events. This complex situation, with ischaemic and haemorrhagic risk factors often being intertwined, may lead to confusion about the required treatment strategy, sometimes resulting in inadequate management or even to therapeutic nihilism. It is therefore critical to provide a comprehensive overview of our understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying acute coronary syndrome in elderly patients, and to summarise the results from the latest clinical trials to help decision making for these high-risk patients.

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are effective tools in managing refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Data comparing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and IMPELLA® are however scarce. We aimed to assess outcomes of patients implanted with these two devices and eligible to both systems. From 2004 to 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 128 patients who underwent VA-ECMO or IMPELLA® in our institution for refractory left ventricle (LV) dominant CS. All patients were eligible to both systems: 97 patients were first implanted with VA-ECMO and 31 with IMPELLA®. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause death. VA-ECMO patients were younger (52 vs. 59.4, p = 0.006) and had a higher lactate level at baseline than those in the IMPELLA® group (6.84 vs. 3.03 mmol/L, p &lt, 0.001). Duration of MCS was similar between groups (9.4 days vs. 6 days in the VA-ECMO and IMPELLA® groups respectively, p = 0.077). In unadjusted analysis, no significant difference was observed between groups in 30-day mortality: 43.3% vs. 58.1% in the VA-ECMO and IMPELLA® groups, respectively (p = 0.152). After adjustment, VA-ECMO was associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (HR = 0.25, p = 0.004). A higher rate of MCS escalation was observed in the IMPELLA® group: 32.3% vs. 10.3% (p = 0.003). In patients eligible to either VA-ECMO or IMPELLA® for LV dominant refractory CS, VA-ECMO was associated with improved survival rate and a lower need for escalation.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is a critical syndrome with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Current management consists of coronary revascularisation, vasoactive drugs, and circulatory and ventilatory support, which are tailored to patients mainly on the basis of clinicians' experience rather than evidence-based recommendations. For many therapeutic interventions in AMICS, randomised clinical trials have not shown a meaningful survival benefit, and a disproportionately high rate of neutral and negative results has been reported. In this context, an accurate definition of the AMICS syndrome for appropriate patient selection and optimisation of study design are warranted to achieve meaningful results and pave the way for new, evidence-based therapeutic options. In this Position Paper, we provide a statement of priorities and recommendations agreed by a multidisciplinary group of experts at the Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop in February, 2020, for the optimisation and harmonisation of clinical trials in AMICS. Implementation of proposed criteria to define the AMICS population-moving beyond a cardio-centric definition to that of a systemic disease-and steps to improve the design of clinical trials could lead to improved outcomes for patients with this life-threatening syndrome.

Background A strong association between on-thienopyridine platelet reactivity (PR) and the risk of both thrombotic and bleeding events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated. However, no study has analyzed the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR and clinical outcome in this clinical setting. Objectives We aimed to investigate the relationship between on-ticagrelor PR, assessed by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index, and clinical outcome in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Methods We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients undergoing PCI for ACS. PR was measured using the VASP index following ticagrelor loading dose. The primary study endpoint was the rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥2 at 1 year. The key secondary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and urgent revascularization. Results We included 570 ACS patients, among whom 33.9% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction. BARC type ≥2 bleeding occurred in 10.9% and MACE in 13.8%. PR was not associated with BARC ≥2 or with MACE (p = 0.12 and p = 0.56, respectively). No relationship between PR and outcomes was observed, neither when PR was analyzed quantitatively nor when it was analyzed qualitatively (low on-treatment PR [LTPR] vs. no LTPR). Conclusion On-ticagrelor PR measured by the VASP was not associated with bleeding or thrombotic events in ACS patients undergoing PCI. PR measured by the VASP should not be used as a surrogate endpoint in studies on ticagrelor.

The rationale for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock is to restore cardiac output in selected patients when critically low or in case of refractory cardiac arrest. Furthermore, an MCS device that moves blood from either the left atrium or the left ventricle to the systemic circulation will potentially unload the ventricle. These devices are used alone or in combination with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). If a left-sided Impella device is used, it should be run at the highest possible performance level during treatment while avoiding suction events. When combined with VA-ECMO, the Impella device should be run at a lower performance level, ensuring sufficient left ventricular emptying but avoiding suction. Continuous monitoring is pivotal and patients managed outside the catheterization laboratory should be monitored with an arterial line, a central venous catheter, frequent use of pulmonary artery catheters and regular imaging by transthoracic echocardiogram. The rationale for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock is to restore cardiac output in selected patients when critically low or in case of refractory cardiac arrest. Furthermore, an MCS device that moves blood from either the left atrium or the left ventricle to the systemic circulation will potentially unload the ventricle. These devices are used alone or in combination with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). If a left-sided Impella device is used, it should be run at the highest possible performance level during treatment while avoiding suction events. When combined with VA-ECMO, the Impella device should be run at a lower performance level, ensuring sufficient left ventricular emptying but avoiding suction. Continuous monitoring is pivotal and patients managed outside the catheterization laboratory should be monitored with an arterial line, a central venous catheter, frequent use of pulmonary artery catheters and regular imaging by transthoracic echocardiogram.

Background: Impella CP is a left ventricular pump which may serve as a circulatory support during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest (CA). Nevertheless, the survival rate and factors associated with survival in patients undergoing Impella insertion during CPR for CA are unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter international registry of patients undergoing Impella insertion during on-going CPR for in- or out-of-hospital CA. We recorded immediate and 30-day survival with and without neurologic impairment using the cerebral performance category score and evaluated the factors associated with survival. Results: Thirty-five patients had an Impella CP implanted during CPR for CA. Refractory ventricular arrhythmias were the most frequent initial rhythm (65.7%). In total, 65.7% of patients immediately survived. At 30 days, 45.7% of patients were still alive. The 30-day survival rate without neurological impairment was 37.1%. In univariate analysis, survival was associated with both an age &lt, 75 years and a time from arrest to CPR &le, 5 min (p = 0.035 and p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusions: In our multicenter registry, Impella CP insertion during ongoing CPR for CA was associated with a 37.1% rate of 30-day survival without neurological impairment. The factors associated with survival were a young age and a time from arrest to CPR &le, 5 min.

We investigated prognostic factors associated with refractory left ventricle (LV) failure leading to LV assist device (LVAD), heart transplant or death in patients on an axial flow pump support for cardiogenic shock (CS). Sixty-two CS patients with an Impella&reg, CP or 5.0 implant were retrospectively enrolled, and clinical, biological, echocardiographic, coronarographic and management data were collected. They were compared according to the 30-day outcome. Patients were mainly male (n = 55, 89%), 58 &plusmn, 11 years old and most had no history of heart failure or coronary artery disease (70%). The main etiology of CS was acute coronary syndrome (n = 57, 92%). They presented with severe LV failure (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 22 &plusmn, 9%), organ malperfusion (lactate 3.1 &plusmn, 2.1 mmol/L), and frequent use of inotropes, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation (59, 66 and 30%, respectively). At 24 h, non-recovery was associated with higher total bilirubin (odds ratios (OR) 1.07 (1.00&ndash, 1.14), p = 0.039), lower LVEF (OR 0.89 (0.81&ndash, 0.96), p = 0.006) and the number of administrated amines (OR 4.31 (1.30&ndash, 14.30), p = 0.016). Early evaluation in patients with CS with an axial flow pump implant may enable the identification of factors associated with an unlikely recovery and would call for early screening for LVAD or heart transplant.

BackgroundMyocarditis is a rare but life-threatening adverse event of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recent guidelines recommend the use of high doses of corticosteroids as a first-line treatment, followed by intensified immunosuppressive therapy (IIST) in the case of unfavorable evolution. However, this strategy is empirical, and no studies have specifically addressed this issue. Therefore, we aimed to investigate and compare the clinical course, management and outcome of ICI-induced myocarditis patients requiring or not requiring IIST.MethodsThis case–control study included all patients consecutively admitted to The Mediterranean University Center of Cardio-Oncology (Aix-Marseille University, France) for the diagnosis of ICI-induced myocarditis according to Bonaca’s criteria and treated with or without IIST. In addition, we searched PubMed and included patients from previously published case reports treated with IIST in the analysis. The clinical, biological, imaging, treatment, all-cause death and cardiovascular death data of patients who required IIST were compared with those of patients who did not.ResultsA total of 60 patients (69±12 years) were included (36 were treated with IIST and 24 were not). Patients requiring IIST were more likely to have received a combination of ICIs (39% vs 8%, p=0.01), and developed the first symptoms/signs of myocarditis earlier after the onset of ICI therapy (median, 18 days vs 60 days, p=0.002). They had a significantly higher prevalence of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, complete atrioventricular block, cardiogenic shock and troponin elevation. Moreover, they were more likely to have other immune-related adverse events simultaneously (pConclusionThe need for IIST was more common in patients who developed myocarditis very early after the start of ICI therapy, as well as when hemodynamic/electrical instability or neuromuscular adverse events occurred. Treatment with infliximab might be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death.

Systems of care have been challenged to control progression of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether this has been associated with delayed reperfusion and worse outcomes in French patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown.Aim: To compare the rate of STEMI admissions, treatment delays, and outcomes between the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France and the equivalent period in 2019.Methods: In this nationwide French survey, data from consecutive STEMI patients from 65 centres referred for urgent revascularization between 1 March and 31 May 2020, and between 1 March and 31 May 2019, were analysed. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death or non-fatal mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction.Results: A total of 6306 patients were included. During the pandemic peak, a 13.9±6.6% (P=0.003) decrease in STEMI admissions per week was observed. Delays between symptom onset and percutaneous coronary intervention were longer in 2020 versus 2019 (270 [interquartile range 150-705] vs 245 [140-646]min; P=0.013), driven by the increase in time from symptom onset to first medical contact (121 [60-360] vs 150 [62-420]min; P=0.002). During 2020, a greater number of mechanical complications was observed (0.9% vs 1.7%; P=0.029) leading to a significant difference in the primary outcome (112 patients [5.6%] in 2019 vs 129 [7.6%] in 2020; P=0.018). No significant difference was observed in rates of orotracheal intubation, in-hospital cardiac arrest, ventricular arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock.Conclusions: During the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, there was a decrease in STEMI admissions, associated with longer ischaemic time, exclusively driven by an increase in patient-related delays and an increase in mechanical complications. These findings suggest the need to encourage the population to seek medical help in case of symptoms., Contexte. Les systèmes de santé à travers le monde ont été fortement mis à l’épreuve afin de contrôler la progression de l’épidémie de la COVID-19. L’éventualité que la réorganisation des soins ait pu influencer les délais de reperfusion ou le devenir des patients présentant des syndromes coronaires aigus avec sus-décalage du segment ST (SCA ST +) n’a pas été explorée en France.Objectif. Comparer le taux d’admissions pour SCA ST+, les délais de traitement et enfin le devenir de ces patients entre la première vague épidémique de la COVID-19 et pendant la période similaire en 2019.Méthodes. Dans ce registre national multicentrique, les patients avec SCA ST+ provenant de 65 centres français admis en urgence pour revascularisation entre le 1e mars et le 31 mai 2020 et entre le 1e mars et le 31 mai 2019 ont été analysés. Le critère de jugement principal était un critère composite regroupant la mortalité intrahospitalière toute cause confondue et les complications mécaniques en lien avec l’infarctus.Résultats. Un total de 6 306 patients ont été inclus. Pendant le pic de la pandémie une réduction de 13,9 ± 6,6 % (P = 0,003) des admissions pour SCA ST+ a été observée par semaine. Les délais entre l’apparition des symptômes et l’angioplastie percutanée était significativement augmentés 270 (150−705) versus 245 (140−646) minutes (P = 0,013). Cette augmentation était exclusivement liée à une augmentation du temps entre l’apparition des symptômes et le premier contact médical 121 (60−360) en 2019 versus 150 (62−420) minutes en 2020 (P = 0,002). Durant cette période a été constaté un plus grand nombre de complications mécaniques (0,9 % vs 1,7 % (P = 0,029) conduisant à une augmentation significative de notre critère de jugement principal 112 patients (5,6) en 2019 vs 129 (7,6 %) en 2020 (P = 0,018).Conclusions. Pendant le premier pic de la pandémie il a été constaté : une diminution du taux de SCA ST + associé à un temps d’ischémie prolongé, poussé par l’augmentation du temps entre l’apparition des symptômes et le premier contact médical et enfin un plus grand nombre de complications mécaniques. Ces observations suggèrent la nécessité d’encourager la population à consulter au moindre symptôme inquiétant.

International audience; Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and cardiovascular death. CKD patients suffering from ACS are exposed to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrences and a higher bleeding rate than patients with normal renal function. However, CKD patients are excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, determining the optimal antiplatelet strategy in this population is of utmost importance. We designed the TicagRelor Or Clopidogrel in severe or terminal chronic kidney patients Undergoing PERcutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome (TROUPER) trial: a prospective, controlled, multicenter, randomized trial to investigate the optimal P2Y12 antagonist in CKD patients with ACS. Patients with stage >= 3b CKD are eligible if the diagnosis of ACS is made and invasive strategy scheduled. Patients are randomized 1:1 between a control group with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by a 75-mg/d maintenance dose for 1 year and an experimental group with a 180-mg loading dose of ticagrelor followed by a 90-mg twice daily maintenance dose for the same duration. The primary end point is defined by the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke at 1 year. Safety will be evaluated by the bleeding rate (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium). To demonstrate the superiority of ticagrelor on major adverse cardiovascular events, we calculated that 508 patients are required. The aim of the TROUPER trial is to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in stage >3b CKD patients presenting with ACS and scheduled for an invasive strategy.

Objectives To assess the benefit/risk ratio to perform a coronary angiography (CA) before surgery for infective endocarditis (IE). Methods We conducted a single-center prospective registry including 272 patients with acute IE intended for surgery and compared patients who underwent a preoperative CA (n = 160) with those who did not (n = 112). A meta-analysis of 3 observational studies was also conducted and included 551 patients: 342 who underwent a CA and 209 who did not. Results In our registry, combined bypass surgery (CABG) was performed in 17% of the patients with preoperative CA. At 2 years, the rate of the primary composite end point (all-cause death, new systemic embolism, stroke, new hemodialysis) was similar in the CA (38%) and no-CA (37%) groups. In-hospital and 2-year individual end points were all similar between groups. There were only 2 episodes of systemic embolism after CA and only one possibly related to a vegetation dislodgement. In the meta-analysis, combined CABG was performed in 18% of the patients with preoperative CA. All-cause death was similar in both groups: odds ratio, 0.98 [0.62-1.53], P = .92. Only 5 cases of systemic embolism possibly related to a vegetation dislodgement were reported. New hemodialysis was numerically more frequent in the CA group: odds ratio, 1.68 [0.79-3.58] (18% vs 14%, P = .18). Conclusions In daily practice, two-thirds of the patients with acute IE who required surgery have a preoperative CA leading to a combined CABG in 18% of the patients. Our results suggest that to perform a preoperative CA in this context is not associated with improved prognosis.

International audience; Acute pulmonary embolism is a frequent cardiovascular emergency with an increasing incidence. The prognosis of patients with high-risk and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism has not improved over the last decade. The current treatment strategies are mainly based on anticoagulation to prevent recurrence and reduce pulmonary vasculature obstruction. However, the slow rate of thrombus lysis under anticoagulation is unable to acutely decrease right ventricle overload and pulmonary vasculature resistance in patients with severe obstruction and right ventricle dysfunction. Therefore, patients with high-risk and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism remain a therapeutic challenge. Reperfusion therapies may be discussed for these patients, and include systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapies and surgical thrombectomy. High-risk patients require systemic thrombolysis, but may have contraindications as a result of the high risk of bleeding. In addition, intermediate-high-risk patients should not receive systemic thrombolysis, despite its high efficacy, because of prohibitive bleeding complications. Recently, percutaneous reperfusion techniques have been developed to acutely decrease pulmonary vascular obstruction with lower-dose or no thrombolytic agents and, thus, potentially higher safety than systemic thrombolysis. Some of these techniques improve key haemodynamic variables. Cardiac surgical techniques and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as temporary circulatory support may be useful in selected cases. The development of pulmonary embolism centres with multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism teams is mandatory to enable adequate use of reperfusion and improve outcomes. We aim to present the state of the art regarding reperfusion therapies in pulmonary embolism, but also to provide guidance on their indications and patient selection.; L’embolie pulmonaire aiguë est une urgence cardiovasculaire fréquente. Son incidence augmente rapidement tandis que sa mortalité reste stable. Le pronostic des patients à haut risque et à risque intermédiaire élevé reste médiocre sans amélioration au cours de la dernière décennie. Les stratégies de traitement actuelles reposent sur l’anticoagulation pour prévenir les récidives et réduire l’obstruction vasculaire pulmonaire. Cependant, la lyse du thrombus sous anticoagulant est lente et ne permet pas une diminution rapide de la surcharge du ventricule droit et des résistances vasculaires pulmonaires chez les patients présentant une obstruction sévère et une dysfonction ventriculaire droite. La prise en charge de ces patients reste un défi thérapeutique et peut amener à discuter des thérapies de reperfusion comme la thrombolyse systémique, les techniques percutanées par cathéter et la thrombectomie chirurgicale. La thrombolyse systémique est indiquée chez les patients à haut risque en l’absence de contre-indication formelle en raison du risque hémorragique. Mais elle ne devrait pas être utilisée chez les patients à risque intermédiaire élevé malgré son efficacité élevée en raison de complications hémorragiques rédhibitoires. Récemment, les techniques de reperfusion percutanées ont été développées visant à diminuer de manière aiguë l’obstruction vasculaire pulmonaire avec un dose réduite ou sans thrombolytique et en conséquence un profil de sécurité amélioré. Certaines de ces techniques ont démontré une grande efficacité sur les paramètres hémodynamiques clés. Enfin, les techniques de chirurgie cardiaque et le support circulatoire temporaire par ECMO veno-artérielle se sont améliorées et peuvent être utiles dans certains cas. Le développement de centres spécialisés avec une équipe multidisciplinaire est obligatoire afin de permettre une utilisation adéquate de la reperfusion pour améliorer le pronostic des patients. Ce document vise à faire un état de l’art concernant les thérapies de reperfusion de l’embolie pulmonaire tout en discutant leurs indications et la sélection des patients.

Objective: Impaired vascular tone plays an important role in cardiogenic shock. Doppler echocardiography provides a non-invasive estimation of systemic vascular resistance. The aim of the present study was to compare Doppler echocardiography with the transpulmonary thermodilution method for the assessment of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock. Methods: This prospective monocentric comparison study was conducted in a single cardiology intensive care unit (Hopital Nord, Marseille, France). We assessed the systemic vascular resistance index by both echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in 28 patients admitted for cardiogenic shock, on admission and after the introduction of an inotrope or vasopressor treatment. Results: A total of 35 paired echocardiographic and transpulmonary thermodilution estimations of the systemic vascular resistance index were compared. Echocardiography values ranged from 1309 to 3526 dynes.s.m2/cm5 and transpulmonary thermodilution values ranged from 1320 to 3901 dynes.s.m2/cm5. A statistically significant correlation was found between echocardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution ( r=0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.93; P2/cm5 (95% CI −230.06, 6.16). Limits of agreement were −785.86, 561.96. Conclusions: Doppler echocardiography constitutes an accurate non-invasive alternative to transpulmonary thermodilution to provide an estimation of systemic vascular resistance in patients with cardiogenic shock.

The pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) varies depending on its etiology, which may lead to different hemodynamic profiles (HP) and may help tailor therapy. We aimed to assess the HP of CS patients according to their etiologies of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF). We included patients admitted for CS secondary to ADCHF and AMI. HP were measured before the administration of any inotrope or vasopressor. Systemic Vascular Resistances index (SVRi), Cardiac Index (CI), and Cardiac Power Index (CPI) were measured by trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography on admission. Among 37 CS patients, 28 had CS secondary to ADCHF or AMI and were prospectively included. The two groups were similar in terms of demographic data and shock severity criteria. AMI CS was associated with lower SVRi compared to CS related to ADCHF: 2010 (interquartile range (IQR): 1895&ndash, 2277) vs. 2622 (2264&ndash, 2993) dynes-s&middot, cm&minus, 5&middot, m&minus, 2 (p = 0.002). A trend toward a higher CI was observed: respectively 2.13 (1.88&ndash, 2.18) vs. 1.78 (1.65&ndash, 1.96) L&middot, min&minus, 1&middot, 2 (p = 0.067) in AMICS compared to ADCHF. CS patients had different HP according to their etiologies. AMICS had lower SVR and tended to have a higher CI compared to ADHF CS. These differences should be taken into account for patient selection in future research.

International audience; Background and aims: Genetic partial lipodystrophies are rare heterogeneous disorders characterized by abnormalities of fat distribution and associated metabolic complications including a predisposition for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that the milder forms of these diseases might be under-diagnosed and might result in early acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as the first sign of the pathology. Methods: We performed targeted sequencing on a panel of 8 genes involved in genetic lipodystrophy for 62 patients with premature ACS, and selected heterozygous missense variations with low frequency. To confirm those results, we analyzed a second independent group of 60 additional patients through Sanger sequencing, and compared to a control group of 120 healthy patients. Results: In the first cohort, only PLIN1 exhibited variants in more than 1 patient. In PLIN1, 3 different variants were found in 6 patients. We then analyzed PLIN1 sequence in the second cohort with premature ACS and found 2 other patients. Altogether, 8 patients were carriers of 4 different mutations in PLIN1. The variant frequencies in the total cohort of 122 patients were compared to frequencies observed in a local control cohort and in 2 different public databases showing a significant difference between patient vs control group frequencies for two mutations out of 4 (c.245C > T p = 10(-4); c.839G > A p = 0.014). Discussion: This is the first study that identifies a high frequency of potential pathogenic mutations in PLIN1 related to early onset ACS. These findings could contribute to the prevention and care of precocious ACS in families carrying those mutations.

International audience; Aim: We attempted to describe the risk of heart failure (HF) occurrence according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) over time, from acute myocardial infarction (MI) to the chronic stable phase. Methods: For the acute and subacute MI phases, we analysed the FAST-MI cohort restricted to patients with -out history of HF (n = 12,473). The analysis on 1-year outcomes after MI was further restricted to patients who were discharged alive and without history of HF and/or HF symptoms during the index hospitalisation for MI (n = 9181). To analyse the chronic phase, we analysed the CORONOR cohort restricted to patients with -out history of HF (n = 3871). The primary endpoint was HF occurrence according to DM status. We also ana-lysed the composite of all-cause death or HF. Results: Killip-Kimball class >= II during the index MI hospitalisation was more frequent in DM patients com-pared to non-DM patients (29% vs. 15.3%, adjusted OR = 1.60). At one year after MI, hospitalisation for HF was more frequent in DM patients (3.3% vs. 1.2%, adjusted HR = 1.73). At the chronic phase (5-year outcomes), hospitalisation for HF was more frequent in DM patients (8.5% vs. 4.3%, adjusted HR = 1.70). Results focusing on the composite endpoint (all-cause death or HF) were consistent. Conclusion: DM was associated with a very constant near 2-fold increase in the risk of HF whatever the pre-sentation of CAD. Avoiding the risk of HF occurrence in CAD patients with DM is critical in daily practice and should be a constant life-long endeavour.

Because of its high prevalence, chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a major health hazard throughout the world. Patients with CKD have a high prevalence and incidence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite decades of improved care, their higher risk profile persists and cardiovascular diseases remain their leading cause of death. Along with the reduction of glomerular filtration rate, several physiological processes are impacted and participate in the pathophysiology of ischemic and bleeding events. CKD is associated with an accelerated and severe course of atherothrombotic disease, and this relates to a modified vascular milieu with alterations on the level of the coagulation cascade and platelet aggregation. In addition, pharmacokinetics of several drugs, in particular antithrombotics, are altered and differ from that of non-CKD patients. Patients with CKD therefore represent a challenging population for both physicians and researchers. In addition to these perturbations of physiological processes, CKD patients face 2 major issues. First, there is a clear gap in scientific research as they are commonly underrepresented or excluded from major clinical trials. This is particularly true regarding antithrombotic treatment during ACS. Second, there is a gap in offering evidence-based treatment for these patients including state-of-the art options for revascularization and modern antiplatelet treatment, both of which are commonly underused. During the last decade, new potent oral P2Y 12 -ADP receptor antagonists, prasugrel and ticagrelor, which are more potent antiplatelet agents compared with clopidogrel, were introduced for ACS treatment. However, despite the fact that CKD patients represent a large proportion of those experiencing an ACS and are considered at high risk, there is a lack of dedicated trials and we are left with subgroup analysis of large randomized clinical trials were stage 4 and dialysis patients were rare. In the present review we summarize the mechanisms involved in the high ischemic and bleeding risk of CKD patients and the risk–benefit ratio of potent antiplatelet drugs during ACS.