Most current methods to value healthcare treatments only incorporate measures such as quality-adjusted life-years, combining gains in health-related quality of life and life expectancy in specific ways. Failure of these methods to recognize other dimensions of value has led to calls for methods to include additional values that are associated with the healthcare treatments but not captured directly by quality-adjusted life-years. This article seeks to provide methodologically sound ways to incorporate additional health-related outcomes, focusing on budget-constrained healthcare systems, in which using standard welfare economics methods are often eschewed. The analysis develops standard extra-welfarist approaches to maximizing aggregate health, subject to fixed-budget constraints, using Lagrange multiplier methods. Then, additional valuable health-related outcomes, eg, reduced caregiver burden, real option value, and market- and non-market productivity are introduced. The article also introduces a social welfare function approach to illuminate how disability, disease severity and other equity-related issues can be incorporated into complete welfare measures. Resulting analysis, fully developed in an Appendix in Supplemental Materials found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.005 and summarized in the main text, show that understanding how average and marginal healthcare costs increase with output and how health augments "additional values" provides ways to assess willingness to pay for them in these fixed-budget situations. In budget-constrained healthcare systems, only from actual budget allocations can values both of health itself and "additional values" be inferred. These methods, combined with methodologically sound social welfare functions, demonstrate how to move from "health" to "welfare" in measuring the value of increased healthcare use. • Most analyses using extra-welfarist approaches rely solely on "health" as the measure of value. Methods to assess and use "additional values" beyond health have been sporadic, with no unifying methods available. Few existing analyses of healthcare values have incorporated formal social welfare functions to assess aggregate benefit from health gains, relying instead on ad hoc approaches to adjust for disease severity, disability, and other ethical issues. • Specific formulations are developed to show how to combine values of health improvements and "additional values." This requires that decision makers understand the incremental costs of increasing health levels, the processes by which health adds to "extra values," and the values themselves for health and each "additional value" incorporated into overall value measures. Measuring "additional values" can also be combined with formal social welfare functions to truly move from "health" to "welfare." • In systems with centralized budgets, value is inferred from budget allocations to provide both healthcare services and additional budget augmentations to further gain desired "extra values." In fixed-budget systems, ambiguity may exist as to which funding body should augment healthcare systems' budgets to appropriately increase health output to properly capture "added values." Full social welfare analysis requires knowing not only how much health and "other values" are produced but also who receives them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]