Search

Abstract Patients with previous interatrial shunt device (IASD) implantation may face greater challenges during future left atrial interventional procedures. Herein, we report the first case of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in a patient with previous IASD implantation. The patient successfully underwent LAAC using the LAmbre device without complications.

Patients with previous interatrial shunt device (IASD) implantation may face greater challenges during future left atrial interventional procedures. Herein, we report the first case of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in a patient with previous IASD implantation. The patient successfully underwent LAAC using the LAmbre device without complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data regarding left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus are limited. Recently published cases have mostly been guided by transesophageal echocardiography. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is now widely used during LAAC procedures. This is the first study to report the feasibility of LAAC in patients with LAA thrombus guided by ICE. Patients with persistent LAA thrombus despite anticoagulation or contraindications to anticoagulation who underwent a modified ICE-guided LAAC procedure between June 2021 and April 2023 were included. Periprocedural events and clinical outcomes during follow-up were recorded. A total of 12 patients (mean age 65 ± 7 years; 92% male) were included: 10 with persistent LAA thrombus and 2 with contraindications to anticoagulation. Most of the thrombus was at the apex (n = 6), followed by the body (n = 3) and the ostium (n = 3). A LAmbre device was used and successfully implanted in all patients with the guidance of ICE. No thrombotic material was retrieved from patients with the protection of cerebral protection device (n = 11). No patient experienced severe periprocedural complications. All patients completed transesophageal echocardiography follow-up, and no device-related thrombus or peridevice leak > 3 mm was detected. None of the patients experienced stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or major bleeding events during a median follow-up of 147 days (interquartile range 80–306 days). LAAC using the LAmbre device guided by ICE may be feasible in patients with LAA thrombus when performed by experienced operators. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diameter and shape of the left atrial appendage (LAA) orifices may influence occluder selection and the outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LAA orifice diameter on the safety and efficacy of LAAC using the LAmbre device. Methods: A total of 133 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent LAAC with the LAmbre device between June 2018 and June 2020 were included in this study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the maximal diameter of the LAA orifice: the large LAA group (n = 45) with a maximal orifice diameter of ≥31 mm, and the normal LAA group (n = 88) with a maximal orifice diameter of

The diameter and shape of the left atrial appendage (LAA) orifices may influence occluder selection and the outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LAA orifice diameter on the safety and efficacy of LAAC using the LAmbre device. A total of 133 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent LAAC with the LAmbre device between June 2018 and June 2020 were included in this study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the maximal diameter of the LAA orifice: the large LAA group (n = 45) with a maximal orifice diameter of ≥31 mm, and the normal LAA group (n = 88) with a maximal orifice diameter of <31 mm. The study assessed periprocedural characteristics and long-term clinical follow-up. Successful implantation of the LAmbre device was observed in all patients. The incidence of periprocedural peridevice leakage (PDL) was significantly higher in the large LAA group (P < 0.001), while the incidence of acute pericardial effusion (PE) during the procedure was comparable between the two groups (P = 1.000). After a mean follow‐up period of 4.8 ± 1.7 years, three patients in the large LAA group developed delayed PE, while no patients in the normal LAA group did (P = 0.037). Additionally, a larger LAA maximal orifice diameter was associated with a higher prevalence of PDL (P = 0.001) and PE (including both acute and delayed PE) (P = 0.027). The optimal cutoff value of the LAA maximal orifice diameter for predicting PDL and PE after LAAC with the LAmbre device was determined to be 30 mm. The findings suggest that the LAmbre device is a safe and feasible option for occluding the LAA, regardless of its orifice diameter. However, it is important to note that a larger LAA orifice diameter may increase the risk of PDL and delayed PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundLeft atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is considered a valid alternative for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke in patients with persistent left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) despite adequate anticoagulation. However, the data on LAAC using the LAmbre device for patients with LAAT is limited. This study was performed to explore efficacy and safety as well as to share the experience of the modified LAAC procedure with the LAmbre device.Materials and methodsA total of 7 patients with persistent LAAT despite adequate anticoagulation underwent modified LAAC with the LAmbre device between November 2019 and April 2022. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed 3 months postoperatively to detect device-related thrombosis and peridevice leak. The patients’ clinical events were evaluated during the perioperative and follow-up periods.ResultsThe median age, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score of all patients were 71 [53–73], 3 [2–4], and 2 [2–3], respectively. In the procedure, a cerebral protection system was used in two patients. LAAC with the LAmbre device was successfully performed in all patients without perioperative events. During the median follow-up of 383 [325–865] days, postoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed in six (85.7%) patients. Device-related thrombosis was detected in one (16.7%) patient, and no significant peridevice leak was observed. No thromboembolic event or bleeding event occurred in any patients.ConclusionLAAC with the LAmbre device is effective and safe when performed by experienced operators in highly selected patients with LAAT after adequate anticoagulation.

Embolization of a device in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is an uncommon complication. We present an illustrative case of successful percutaneous retrieval of an embolized LAmbre device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) that was achieved with a combination of a snaring technique and forceps grasping and by using a steerable guiding catheter. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Objectives: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in non-valvar atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces cardioembolic strokes. Despite increased risk, trials exclude valvar AF in structural heart diseases where clots extend beyond appendage. Methods: Patients with AF and relative risks for oral anticoagulation (OAC) needing structural interventions underwent concomitant LAAO. After six months of OAC, aspirin was continued. Transesophageal echocardiogram was done three monthly till one year and yearly thereafter. The patient demographics, procedural details, post-procedural follow-up were analyzed. Results: Nine patients aged 51.5 ± 6.3 years with AF underwent LAAO concomitantly with balloon mitral valvotomy in four patients, atrial septal defect device closure in four and periprosthetic mitral leak closure in one patient. Six patients had heart failure, four had prior embolic events, and two had documented LAA thrombus. The mean CHADS2VASc score was 2.44 ± 0.8 and mean HASBLED score was 3.0 ± 0.8. Devices included Amplatzer Cardiac Plug™ in six patients, LAmbre™ Lifetech device in two and Watchman™ device in one. All procedures were successful without acute complications. A patient developed pericardial effusion at six months requiring pericardiocentesis. Early device-associated thrombus in one patient resolved after OAC for six months. No embolic events occurred on follow-up. Conclusion: On a detailed literature search, this largest LAAO experience in structural heart diseases indicates its utility. OAC for six months followed by aspirin seems to prevent thrombus formation in these patients. The only incidence of early thrombus formation indicates immunity from clot formation after device endothelialisation. Larger multicenter trials combining LAAO with structural interventions in valvular AF are warranted in developing nations.

Background: Cardiac troponin T (cTNT) has been widely used in detecting cardiac damage. Elevated cTNT level has been reported to be associated with increased mortality in multiple cardiac conditions. It is not uncommon to observe an increased level of cTNT in patients after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The objective of the study is to study the incidence, significance, and factors associated with cTNT elevation after LAAO.Methods: We prospectively included patients who underwent LAAO from January 2019 to July 2020 in Fudan Zhongshan Hospital. Patients were divided into those with elevated cTNT after procedure and those with normal postprocedure cTNT. All individuals were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome is major adverse cardiovascular events, which include myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiac death, and stroke. The second outcome is periprocedure complication, including chest pain, tachycardia, cardiac tamponade, change of electrocardiograph, and atrial thrombus.Results: A total of 190 patients were enrolled. Of the patients, 85.3% had elevated cTNT after LAAO, while 14.7% of them did not. Exposure time, dosage of contrast, types of devices, shapes, and sizes of LAA could contribute to elevated postprocedure cTNT. We found that patients with a Watchman device were more likely to have elevated postprocedure cTNT than those with a Lambre device (89.2 vs. 76.7%, p = 0.029). LAAO shapes were associated with cTNT levels in patients with a Watchman device, while the diameter of the outer disc and LAA depth mattered for the Lambre device. There was no significant difference in the primary and second outcome between the two groups (p-value: 0.619, 0.674).Conclusion: LAAO was found to be commonly accompanied with cTNT elevation, which might not to be related to the complications and adverse cardiac outcomes within 1 year of follow-up. Moreover, eGFR at baseline, exposure time, dosage of contrast, types of LAAO device, and LAA morphology could contribute to cTNT elevation.

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is usually performed via the guidance of procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) companied by general anesthesia (GA). Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of LAAO guided by procedural fluoroscopy only. Methods: The patients eligible for LAAO were enrolled into the current study and received implantation of either Watchman device or LAmbre device. The procedure was carried out with procedural fluoroscopy only and no companied GA; the position, shape, and leakage of the device were assessed by contrast angiography. TEE was performed after 3‐month follow‐up to evaluate the thrombosis, and leakage of device. Results: Ninety‐seven patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with either Watchman device (n = 49) or LAmbre device (n = 48) were consecutively enrolled. Watchman device group was of lower CHA2DS2‐VASc and HAS‐BLED scores compared with LAmbre device groups (p <.05); the two groups had similar distributions of other baseline characteristics (p >.05), including procedural success rate (98.0% vs. 97.9%), mean procedure time, mean fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, contrast medium dose, percentage of peri‐device leakage. Pericardial effusions requiring intervention occurred in two of the Watchman group. TEE follow‐up found no patient with residual leakage ≥5 mm at 3 months and no device related thrombosis (DRT). During the 22.0 ± 11.1 months follow‐up, two patients experienced ischemic stroke. Conclusions: LAAO with the procedural imaging of fluoroscopy only exhibited the promising results of efficacy and safety. A prospective randomized multicenter study would be required to verify the observations in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The LAmbre occluder (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China), a new device for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), is increasingly used, but the retrieval procedure for dislodgements has rarely been reported in humans. We herein reported a case of safe retrieval of dislodged LAmbre occluder. The occluder dislodged to the left atrium (LA) at the end of the LAAO procedure. We failed to retrieve the device in the LA using a LASSO catheter and forceps through an 8.5F sheath. After it suddenly flowed into the aortic arch, we successfully retrieved it using the same forceps through a 14F flexible sheath. We also discuss the reasons for device dislodgment and experiences of device retrieval. We think that forceps can be used to retrieve an embolized LAmbre device in the aorta through a 14F flexible sheath. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]