Search

Background Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common and persistent issues experienced by cancer patients. Cancer-related fatigue is a distinct form of fatigue that is subjective, long-lasting and unalleviated by rest or sleep. Studies have shown that almost all cancer patients experience severe fatigue that disrupts the quality of life and physical function, but cancer-related fatigue remains under-addressed in clinical care, and only about half of all patients receive treatment. Methods To increase the awareness of cancer-related fatigue and improve current management, the Taiwan Society of Cancer Palliative Medicine and the Taiwan Oncology Nursing Society convened a consensus committee to develop recommendations for the screening, assessment and treatment of cancer-related fatigue. Results Thirteen consensus recommendations were subsequently developed based on the best available evidence and the clinical experience of committee members. Conclusions These recommendations are expected to facilitate the standardization of cancer-related fatigue management across Taiwan and may also serve as a reference for other clinicians.

Supplementary figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients who completed 6 cycles of BEEP regimen, categorized by whether received further bevacizumab-based maintenance treatment.

Purpose: We hypothesized that a window period between bevacizumab and cytotoxic agents may enhance drug delivery into tumor tissue through bevacizumab-induced vascular normalization in patients with brain metastases of breast cancer (BMBC).Experimental Design: A single-arm phase II study was conducted in which BMBC patients refractory to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were enrolled. In a 21-day cycle, patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1, which, with a 1-day window period, was followed by etoposide (70 mg/m2/day; days 2–4) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2; day 2; BEEP regimen). The BEEP regimen was administered for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the central nervous system (CNS)–objective response rate according to volumetric response criteria.Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled between January 2011 and January 2013. The median age was 54.3 years (range, 33–75); 19 patients (54.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3. Twenty-seven patients [77.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 59.9–89.6] achieved a CNS-objective response, including 13 patients (37.1%) with a ≥80% volumetric reduction of CNS lesions. With a median follow-up of 16.1 months, the median CNS progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.3 months (95% CI, 6.5–8.1) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.2), respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia (30.8%) and infection (21.3%).Conclusions: By administering bevacizumab 1 day before etoposide and cisplatin, the BEEP regimen appeared highly effective in BMBC refractory to WBRT. Further study of vascular normalization window concept is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1851–8. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1. CONSORT diagram

Supplementary Tables. Supplementary Table 1. Pre-defined dose modification levels for sorafenib and refametinib Supplementary Table 2. Single-dose refametinib and its metabolite M17 geometric mean (% coefficient of variation) pharmacokinetic parameters on cycle 1 day −3 Supplementary Table 3. Multiple-dose refametinib and its metabolite M17, and sorafenib and its metabolite M2, geometric mean (% coefficient of variation) pharmacokinetic parameters on cycle 2 day 1 Supplementary Table 4. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring in {greater than or equal to}25% of patients), by CTCAE grade Supplementary Table 5. Incidence of adverse events related to refametinib and sorafenib (occurring in {greater than or equal to}15% of patients), by CTCAE grade Supplementary Table 6. Incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (occurring in {greater than or equal to}2 patients), by CTCAE grades 2-5 Supplementary Table 7. Incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (occurring in {greater than or equal to}2 patients) of CTCAE grades 3-5, related to both study drugs

supplemental legend

Purpose: There is an unmet need for treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is currently the only approved systemic treatment for HCC. Refametinib, an oral, allosteric MEK inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with sorafenib in vitro and in vivo. A phase II study evaluated efficacy and safety of refametinib plus sorafenib in Asian patients with HCC (NCT01204177).Experimental Design: Eligible patients received twice-daily refametinib 50 mg plus twice-daily sorafenib 200 mg (morning)/400 mg (evening), with dose escalation to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily from cycle 2 if no grade ≥2 hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, or gastrointestinal toxicity occurred. Primary efficacy endpoint: disease control rate. Secondary endpoints: time to progression, overall survival, pharmacokinetic assessment, biomarker analysis, safety, and tolerability.Results: Of 95 enrolled patients, 70 received study treatment. Most patients had liver cirrhosis (82.9%) and hepatitis B viral infection (75.7%). Disease control rate was 44.8% (primary efficacy analysis; n = 58). Median time to progression was 122 days, median overall survival was 290 days (n = 70). Best clinical responders had RAS mutations; majority of poor responders had wild-type RAS. Most frequent drug-related adverse events were diarrhea, rash, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, vomiting, and nausea. Dose modifications due to adverse events were necessary in almost all patients.Conclusions: Refametinib plus sorafenib showed antitumor activity in patients with HCC and was tolerated at reduced doses by most patients. Frequent dose modifications due to grade 3 adverse events may have contributed to limited treatment effect. Patients with RAS mutations appear to benefit from refametinib/sorafenib combination. Clin Cancer Res; 20(23); 5976–85. ©2014 AACR.

Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.

Advanced breast cancer (ABC) has become a chronic disease. In such a situation, an effective therapy with low toxicities and economically acceptable is needed. Metronomic vinorelbine (mVNR) has been proved to be effective on the control of MBC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mVNR as the salvage therapy for patients with ABC. Oral vinorelbine (VNR) was administered at 70 mg/m2, fractionated on days 1, 3, and 5, for 3 weeks on and 1 week off. Once the mVNR was combined with trastuzumab, or was combined with bevacizumab, the schedule was changed to 2 weeks on and 1 week off. Clinical data of patients with ABC who had received treatment with mVNR and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. From Mar. 2013 to Dec, 2020, there were 90 patients with ABC received mVNR. The overall response rate was 53.3% and overall disease control rate (DCR) was 78.9% in this study, including 4 (4.4%) cases reached complete response, 44 (48.9%) cases reached partial response and 23 (25.6%) cases were table disease. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) of the Lumina A patients was 13.3 months, Lumina B patients was 9.1 months, Her-2 enrich patients was 8.9 months, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients was 5.6 months. Median overall survival time for Lumina A, Lumina B, Her-2 enrich and TNBC were 54.6 months, 53.3 months, 59.5 months and 24.5 months separately. Side effects were minimal and manageable. Metronomic VNR can be an effective treatment for ABC either works as a switch maintenance or salvage therapy. In combination with target therapy or hormonal therapy, mVNR can further improve TTF and DCR with minimal toxicities. Further study should focus on the optimal dosage, schedule and combination regimen.

Background Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is an emerging clinical issue, although its prevalence and impact on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients in Taiwan remain unclear. The present nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted to provide a thorough overview of the prevalence, related factors and impact of CRF in Taiwan. Methods In this multi-center survey, data were collected using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) Fatigue evaluation, Brief Fatigue Inventory–Taiwan (BFI-T), the Chinese version of the Symptom Distressed Scale and a fatigue experience survey. Logistic regression was used to determine the correlations between fatigue characteristics and the factors studied. Results A total of 1207 cancer patients were recruited from 23 hospitals in Taiwan. Fatigue was the most distressing symptom in Taiwanese cancer patients. The distress score was higher if CRF was diagnosed using ICD-10 compared with BFI-T. Rest and nutritional supplementation were the most common non-pharmacological treatments; blood transfusion was the most common pharmacological treatment. There were 45% of patients reported not receiving a timely intervention for fatigue. Conclusions Fatigue is the most bothersome symptom reported by Taiwanese cancer patients. Caregivers should be aware of the impact of CRF on QOL in cancer patients, constantly measure the severity of fatigue and provide appropriate interventions., Depending on the questionnaire used, the prevalence of fatigue in cancer patients in Taiwan ranges from 23.4 to 71.9%. Fatigue is the most bothersome symptom reported by cancer patients.

550 Background: TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) is a double-blind, Phase 3 study of durvalumab (D), an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), + gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in participants (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). D + GC improved overall survival (OS) in pts with advanced BTC versus placebo (PBO) + GC (Oh et al. NEJM Evid 2022). Use of antibiotics during ICI treatment has been correlated with poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS; Jiang et al. Front Oncol 2022). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive D (1500 mg) or PBO on Day 1 every 3 weeks (Q3W), + G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2) on Days 1 and 8 Q3W, for ≤8 cycles, followed by D or PBO monotherapy Q4W. This exploratory subgroup analysis of TOPAZ-1 assessed OS and PFS by systemic antibiotic use during the study (≥1 dose 14 days before first D/PBO dose to 14 days after last D/PBO dose). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for disease status (initially unresectable or recurrent) and primary tumor location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder cancer). Data cut-off at primary analysis was Aug 11, 2021. Results: The number (%) of pts using antibiotics during the study (D + GC, 167/341 [49.0%]; PBO + GC, 167/344 [48.5%]) was similar between treatment arms. In the D + GC arm, median OS (95% CI) was similar regardless of antibiotics use: 12.6 (9.7–14.8) months in pts with antibiotics use vs 13.0 (10.8–14.7) months in pts without (Table). In the PBO + GC arm, median OS (95% CI) was 10.3 (8.7–12.5) in pts with antibiotics use vs 12.1 (11.0–13.8) in pts without. OS HRs (95% CI) in D + GC vs PBO + GC were 0.78 (0.59–1.02) in pts with antibiotics and 0.81 (0.62–1.07) in pts without. Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.3 (6.5–7.7) months in pts with antibiotics use vs 7.2 (5.9–7.4) months in pts without in the D + GC arm and 5.7 (5.4–6.6) months vs 6.1 (5.6–7.3) months, respectively, in the PBO + GC arm (Table). PFS HRs (95% CI) were 0.70 (0.55–0.89) in pts with antibiotics use and 0.82 (0.65–1.03) in pts without. Conclusions: In the TOPAZ-1 study of D in BTC, no meaningful difference was found in OS or PFS for participants who received antibiotics during the study period compared with those who did not, and results were consistent with the primary analysis. These results support that people receiving D may be treated with antibiotics when clinically indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235 . [Table: see text]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease. It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment. As such, patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens. In the last 5 years, the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased, which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex. In the second-line setting, several phase III trials of regorafenib (RESORCE), ramucirumab (REACH/REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy, with a limited duration of response. Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment. Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL.

Simple Summary Systemic therapies for advanced biliarty tract cancers (BTC) are limited. The combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) has been the standard first-line treatment for advanced BTC from 2010 until now. In order to improve therapeutic effect, especially response rate, we added a novel schedule and dosage of bevacizumab to standard GC regimen. In our real world date, we found this regimen could increase the overall response rate to 50.0%, and side effects were managable. For patients with advanced BTC, especially whose tumors need rapid response to treatment, our regimen can provide an alternative choice. Abstract Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogenous collection of biliary tract cancer at different primary sites, and the prognosis of advanced BTC is dismal. Systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) has been the reference regimen since 2010. How to improve therapeutic effects of GC regimen is an urgent mission at present. Methods: Bevacizumab with a reduced dosage and modified schedule (10 mg/Kg/triweekly, 1 day before GS at the first 2 cycles) was combined with standard GC for patients with advanced BTC. Tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 every 2 months. Kaplan–Meier curves were estimated for time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Result: A total of thirty cases of advanced BTC accepted this treatment, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 50.0%, and the disease control rate was 80.0% for all patients. The median TTF was 5.8 months, the median PFS was 8.4 months, and the median OS was 13.6 months. Most responses were noted at the first evaluation. Adverse effects (AEs) were mostly tolerable. Conclusions: After modifying the schedule, adding bevacizumab to a traditional GC regimen could increase the ORR with a shorter time-to-response, a better PFS and OS than GC alone but without the addition of AE. This regimen can be applied to patients with advanced BTC, especially those who are with a big tumor burden and who need a rapid response.

The global, randomized NAPOLI‐1 phase 3 trial reported a survival benefit with liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) plus 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) after previous gemcitabine‐based therapy. Median overall survival (OS) with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV was 6.1 vs 4.2 months with 5‐FU/LV alone (unstratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, P = .012). Herein, we report efficacy and safety results from a post‐hoc subgroup analysis of Asian patients treated at Asian centers. Primary study endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Patients receiving nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV (n = 34) had significantly longer median OS versus 5‐FU/LV (n = 35) (8.9 vs 3.7 months; unstratified HR = 0.51, P = .025). Patients had significantly increased median PFS with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV (4.0 vs 1.4; unstratified HR = 0.48, P = .011), and increased ORR (8.8% vs 0; P = .114). nal‐IRI monotherapy (n = 50) numerically improved efficacy endpoints versus 5‐FU/LV (n = 48): median OS was 5.8 versus 4.3 months (HR = 0.83, P = .423) and median PFS was 2.8 versus 1.4 months (HR = 0.69, P = .155). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was reported more frequently with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV (54.5% vs 3.4%), and incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea was comparable between the two arms (3.0% vs 6.9%). This subgroup analysis confirms nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV as an efficacious treatment option that improves survival in Asian patients with mPDAC that progressed after gemcitabine‐based therapy, with a safety profile agreeing with previous findings. The nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV regimen should represent a new standard of care for these patients in Asia. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01494506), The global NAPOLI‐1 phase 3 trial (NCT01494506) evaluated the safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) and 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (5‐FU/LV) compared with 5‐FU/LV in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that progressed following gemcitabine‐based therapy. We report data from a post‐hoc subgroup analysis focusing on Asian patients at centers in South Korea and Taiwan. Our findings are consistent with those from the primary analysis and show that, despite association with higher incidence of manageable grade 3‐4 neutropenia, the nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV regimen is an effective treatment option in Asian patients with gemcitabine‐failed metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Objectives: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, considering elderly patients often experience comorbidities and frailty, the utility of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for elderly patients is still debatable. We conducted this study to compare the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and cisplatin in elderly patients with mUC. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled elderly patients with mUC (defined as aged ≥70 years) who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy between September 2001 and October 2018. The primary endpoints were chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs), including treatment-related hospitalization or death. The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 108 elderly patients with mUC were enrolled and allocated into the cisplatin or carboplatin group. Patients treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy had a significantly higher incidence of all grade ≥3 AEs (78.8 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.008) than those on cisplatin. AE-related hospitalization (47.5 vs. 19.1%, p = 0.002) and treatment-related death (17.5 vs. 4.4%, p = 0.02) were significantly increased in the carboplatin group. In the univariate analysis, the median OS in the cisplatin group was significantly increased compared with the carboplatin group (13.6 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.045). The Cox multivariate regression model indicated that leukocytosis (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.84–5.46, p < 0.001) and anemia (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.11–3.65, p = 0.02) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: Elderly patients with mUC treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy had better survival and safety profiles than those treated with carboplatin. Age itself was not a crucial factor in determining cisplatin eligibility.

Purpose: Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+ breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib + capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein.Methods: 621 centrally-assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240mg qd) + C (750mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to L (1250mg qd) + C (1000mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally-assessed progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety.Results: 104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P=0.0014), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P=0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P=0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; PConclusion: Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01808573

Purpose Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein. Methods 621 centrally assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) with loperamide prophylaxis or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid, day 1–14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety. Results 104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P = 0.0011), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P = 0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P = 0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; P Conclusion Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical trial registration NCT01808573

BackgroundBidirectional integrin αIIbβ3 signaling is essential for platelet activation. The platelet adaptor protein Disabled-2 (Dab2) is a key regulator of integrin signaling and is phosphorylated at serine 24 in eukaryotic cells. However, the mechanistic insight and function of Dab2-serine 24 phosphorylation (Dab2-pSer24) in platelet biology are barely understood. This study aimed to define whether and how Dab2 is phosphorylated at Ser24 during platelet activation and to investigate the effect of Dab2-pSer24 on platelet function.ResultsAn antibody with confirmed specificity for Dab2-pSer24 was generated. By using this antibody as a tool, we showed that protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated Dab2-pSer24 was a conservative signaling event when human platelets were activated by the platelet agonists such as thrombin, collagen, ADP, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, and the thromboxane A2 activator U46619. The agonists-stimulated Dab2-pSer24 was attenuated by pretreatment of platelets with the RGDS peptide which inhibits integrin outside-in signaling by competitive binding of integrin αIIb with fibrinogen. Direct activation of platelet integrin outside-in signaling by combined treatment of platelets with manganese dichloride and fibrinogen or by spreading of platelets on fibrinogen also resulted in Dab2-pSer24. These findings implicate that Dab2-pSer24 was associated with the outside-in signaling of integrin. Further analysis revealed that Dab2-pSer24 was downstream of Src-PKC-axis and phospholipase D1 underlying the integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling. A membrane penetrating peptide R11-Ser24 which contained 11 repeats of arginine linked to the Dab2-Ser24 phosphorylation site and its flanking sequences (RRRRRRRRRRR19APKAPSKKEKK29) and the R11-S24A peptide with Ser24Ala mutation were designed to elucidate the functions of Dab2-pSer24. R11-Ser24 but not R11-S24A inhibited agonists-stimulated Dab2-pSer24 and consequently suppressed platelet spreading on fibrinogen, with no effect on platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding. Notably, Ser24 and the previously reported Ser723 phosphorylation (Dab2-pSer723) occurred exclusively in a single Dab2 molecule and resulted in distinctive subcellular distribution and function of Dab2. Dab2-pSer723 was mainly distributed in the cytosol of activated platelets and associated with integrin inside-out signaling, while Dab2-pSer24 was mainly distributed in the membrane fraction of activated platelets and associated with integrin outside-in signaling.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate for the first time that Dab2-pSer24 is conservative in integrin αIIbβ3 outside-in signaling during platelet activation and plays a novel role in the control of cytoskeleton reorganization and platelet spreading on fibrinogen.

Our submission is the Correspondence to the text with the title of “Phase I/II study of adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with pancreatic cancer and peritoneal metastasis”. It was published in Br J Surg 2020; 107: 1811–1817.

Background: Induction chemotherapy (IC) has a proven role in organ preservation and reducing distant failure. However, its ability to prolong survival remains controversy. Herein, we conducted a nationwide population‐based matched cohort study to investigate the association of primary tumor location with the role of IC in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) Methods: In this population based study, we retrospectively identified patients who aged 18 years and older with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC between 2007 and 2016 from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into two group : IC group and definitive CCRT group. The primary tumor locations were classified into four part : oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx. In order to reduce the selection bias, IC patients were individually matched at a ratio of 1 : 1 with the CCRT patients. The oncologic outcomes were presented with overall survival (OS). Findings: A total of 5547 patients were identified. After 1:1 matching, 1564 patients were analyzed for outcomes comparison, including 782 patients in each group. In general, median OS were 27.3 months versus 28.5 months in IC and CCRT group, respectively (p=0.6151). Patients were thereafter stratified by primary tumor location. For patients with oral cavity and laryngeal cancers, the median OS was significantly inferior in IC group than those in CCRT group, while for patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer, the median OS was superior in IC group than those in CCRT group. Interpretation: IC has a divergent role in patients with different primary tumor location. Primary tumor location should be taken into consideration when facing the dilemma of IC followed by CCRT or definitive CCRT. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm our results. Funding: This work was supported by the Room for Database Research of E-DA HEALTHCARE GROUP (grant no. EDCD2001) Declaration of Interest: The authors have nothing to declare Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the E-Da Cancer Hospital in Taiwan (EMRP-108-061), and the requirements for informed consent were waived.

Background PD-1/L1 inhibitors are treatment options for patients with HCC who have progressed after first-line sorafenib treatment. Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity in patients with advanced, previously treated HCC in two early phase studies (NCT02407990, NCT04068519). Association of biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression and gene expression profiles (GEP), with response and resistance to tislelizumab were explored. Methods PD-L1 expression was evaluated on tumor cells (TC) using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay in baseline tumor samples collected before or after sorafenib treatment. GEP were assessed using the 1392-gene HTG GEP EdgeSeq panel. Signature scores were calculated using the Gene Set Variation Analysis package with publicly available gene signatures (GS). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze differential gene signatures (DEG); GS association with PFS and OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Single-agent tislelizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced, previously treated HCC (ORR=13%; CB [PR+SD >6 months]=31%, median PFS=3.3 months; median OS=13.3 months). PD-L1+ (TC≥1%) prevalence and GEP showed different patterns in samples collected before and after sorafenib exposure (figure 1). While non-exposed samples (n=16) were enriched for immune suppressive signatures, sorafenib-exposed samples (n=41) showed higher PD-L1+ prevalence (53.7% vs 25%; P=0.08) and immune-cell activation signatures along with co-inhibition molecules. In sorafenib-exposed samples, PD-L1 expression was positively correlated with CB (P=0.0027) and a trend of longer PFS (HR=0.56, 95% CI:0.28–1.13). ORR was higher in PD-L1+ than PD-L1− sorafenib-exposed samples (23.8% vs 0%; P=0.049). DEG analysis in sorafenib-exposed samples demonstrated that NK-mediated cytotoxicity GS was positively correlated with CB (P=0.03), as well as a trend of longer PFS (HR=0.43, 95% CI:0.17–1.06). Across the different analyses, no correlation with OS was observed. Patients considered non-responders (NRs) were found clustered into three distinct GEP subgroups (NR1, NR2, NR3). Compared with responders, NR1 had enhanced angiogenesis signatures (P=0.01), including TEK, KDR, HGF, and EGR1. Despite high inflamed tumor signatures, NR2 had increased expression of T-cell inhibition GS scores (P=0.01), including CD274, CTLA4, TIGIT, and CD96. The NR3 subgroup showed higher cell-cycle GS scores compared with responders (P=0.05), including E2F7, FOXA1, and FANCD2. Conclusions Prior sorafenib exposure appears to be associated with increased PD-L1 expression and tumor microenvironment-related GS, as well as response and PFS from tislelizumab in advanced HCC patients. Elevated angiogenesis, immune exhaustion, and cell-cycle GS levels may indicate resistance to single-agent PD-1 inhibitors and is suggestive of potential treatment strategies. Validation is warranted in future clinical trials (NCT03412773). Acknowledgements This study was sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Regina Switzer, PhD, and Elizabeth Hermans, PhD (OPEN Health Medical Communications, Chicago. IL), and funded by the study sponsor. Trial Registration NCT02407990, NCT04068519

BackgroundThe programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis plays a central role in suppressing antitumor immunity; axis dysregulation can be used by cancer cells to evade the immune system. Tislelizumab, an investigational monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for PD-1, was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages to limit antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a potential mechanism of resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. The aim of this phase IA/IB study was to investigate the safety/tolerability, antitumor effects and optimal dose and schedule of tislelizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsPatients (aged ≥18 years) enrolled in phase IA received intravenous tislelizumab 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; 2 or 5 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks; or 200 mg every 3 weeks; patients in phase IB received 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary objectives were to assess tislelizumab’s safety/tolerability profile by adverse event (AE) monitoring and antitumor activity using RECIST V.1.1. PD-L1 expression was assessed retrospectively with the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay.ResultsBetween May 2015 and October 2017, 451 patients (n=116, IA; n=335, IB) were enrolled. Fatigue (28%), nausea (25%) and decreased appetite (20%) were the most commonly reported AEs. Most AEs were grade 1–2 severity; anemia (4.9%) was the most common grade 3–4 AE. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 5.3% of patients. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 14 patients; 2 were considered related to tislelizumab. Pneumonitis (2%) and colitis (1%) were the most common serious tislelizumab-related AEs. As of May 2019, 18% of patients achieved a confirmed objective response in phase IA and 12% in phase IB; median follow-up duration was 13.6 and 7.6 months, respectively. Pharmacokinetics, safety and antitumor activity obtained from both phase IA and IB determined the tislelizumab recommended dose; ultimately, tislelizumab 200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks was the dose and schedule recommended to be taken into subsequent clinical trials.ConclusionsTislelizumab monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety/tolerability profile. Durable responses were observed in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, supporting the evaluation of tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, as monotherapy and in combination therapy, for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.Trial registration numberNCT02407990.

Aim To evaluate the prevalence of pain in cancer outpatients in Taiwan and to investigate the impact of pain on quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction. Results were compared to those of a similarly designed study conducted in 2008 to identify trends. Methods Adult patients with cancer treated as outpatients in hospitals throughout Taiwan were recruited. Pain intensity and the extent to which pain interfered with QoL were self-reported using a modified version of the Brief Pain Inventory. Patients also indicated their level of satisfaction with their physician, as well as with their pain control. Results A total of 2652 patients were enrolled from 16 sites. Of these, 1167 (44.0%) patients reported experiencing pain during the previous week. Prevalence and severity of pain were highest in patients with progressive disease. A higher pain severity score was significantly associated with greater interference in both physical and psychological functions. Overall, 86.0% of all participants expressed satisfaction with their physician and 84.8% were satisfied with their pain control; satisfaction rates were associated with pain severity. Compared with the findings from the 2008 study, pain prevalence was notably lower and patient satisfaction was significantly greater in the current study. Conclusions Prevalence and severity of pain were associated with disease stage. Pain interference on QoL correlated significantly with pain severity. Treatment of pain in cancer patients in Taiwan seems to have improved from 2008 to 2014, possibly attributable to new cancer pain treatment guidelines and the wider availability of novel analgesic therapies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common causes of cancer death in men. Whether or not a longitudinal follow-up of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) before and at different time points during systemic/targeted therapy is useful for monitoring the treatment response of patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC has been evaluated in this study. Blood samples (n = 104) were obtained from patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC (n = 30) for the enrichment of CTCs by a negative selection method. Analysis of the blood samples from patients with defined disease status (n = 81) revealed that those with progressive disease (PD, n = 37) had significantly higher CTC counts compared to those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD, n = 44 for PR + SD, p = 0.0002). The median CTC count for patients with PD and for patients with PR and SD was 50 (interquartile range 21&ndash, 139) and 15 (interquartile range 4&ndash, 41) cells/mL of blood, respectively. A longitudinal analysis of patients (n = 17) after a series of blood collections demonstrated that a change in the CTC count correlated with the patient treatment response in most of the cases and was particularly useful for monitoring patients without elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Sequential CTC enumeration during treatment can supplement standard medical tests and benefit the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC, in particular for the AFP-low cases.

Poor adherence to analgesic drugs is one of the most common barriers to adequate pain management. This prospective, cross-sectional, patient-oriented observational study aimed to explore the adherence rate, clinical factors, and impact of adherence to analgesic drugs on the quality of life (QoL) among cancer outpatients in Taiwan. Eight hundred ninety-seven consecutive adult outpatients with cancer who had reported tumor pain and received regular analgesic drug treatment were enrolled from 16 medical centers across Taiwan. The Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess pain intensity and QoL. Morisky’s four-item medication adherence scale was used to assess adherence to analgesic drugs. Clinical factors possibly associated with good adherence to analgesic drugs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Of the 897 patients, 26.9% met criteria for the good, 35.5% for the moderate, and 37.6% for the poor adherence groups. The good adherence group had significantly better QoL outcomes than the moderate and poor adherence groups (all p

There is an increasing trend in the incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) worldwide. The aim of the present study was to identify the prognostic factors of patients with GEP-NENs. A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review study was conducted among patients with pathologically proven GEP-NENs between January 2003 and December 2016 at Kaohsiung Chung-Gung Memorial Hospital. A total of 97 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included (male/female = 56/41, age: 57.7 ± 15.4 years). The presentation, clinical characteristics, and disease outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. The most common primary site of the GEP-NENs was the rectum (49.5%), followed by the pancreas (17.5%), duodenum (11.3%), stomach (10.3%), colon (6.2%), and appendix (5.2%), and most GEP-NENs were hormonally nonfunctional (94.8%). There were 56 tumors classified as G1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), 9 as G2 NETs, and 14 as G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Metastasis was found in 15 patients (15%). Curative treatments, such as surgery or endoscopic resection, were performed in 83.5% of patients (n = 81). The mean overall survival duration was 107.2 ± 7.8 months. The estimated 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for all patients were 84% and 82%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that large tumor size, non-rectal NENs, high histopathological grading, lymphatic metastases and distant metastases were associated with poor survival. This study suggested that the presence of lymphatic or distant metastases at diagnosis is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with GEP-NENs. Keywords: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, Clinical outcome, Prognostic factors

Background: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been studied in various types of cancer which is significantly correlated with prognosis. The study aims to investigate the predictive role of PNI in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with systemic chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 141 patients with mUC who received systemic chemotherapy. PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin concentration (g/dL) + 0.005 × lymphocyte count (number/mm2). The optimal cut-off value for PNI was estimated by using receiver operating curve analysis. Independent factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox proportional regression models. Results: The recommended cut-off value for PNI was 40. Patients with a low PNI had more visceral metastases (p < 0.0001), leukocytosis (p = 0.006), and anemia (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, patients with a low PNI had poor OS than those with a high PNI (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis showed PNI was an independent factor to predict OS (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed PNI is an independent prognostic factor in patients with mUC. Our work is clinically useful for anticipation of outcomes, risks stratification in clinical studies as well as patients counseling.