Back to Search Start Over

Randomised Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib vs sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression

Authors :
Chia Jui Yen
Ho Yeong Lim
Juergen Scheele
J. Straub
Joong-Won Park
Hongming Pan
Tae-You Kim
Shukui Qin
Baek Yeol Ryoo
Dongli Zhou
K. Berghoff
Kun Ming Rau
Hye Jin Choi
Ann Li Cheng
Jee Hyun Kim
Zhenggang Ren
Source :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.

Details

ISSN :
15321827 and 00070920
Volume :
125
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....9b18d642d64fafacc8327f1fd9885b4e