Search

The so-called ‘replicability crisis’ has sparked methodological discussions in many areas of science in general, and in psychology in particular. This has led to recent endeavours to promote the transparency, rigour, and ultimately, replicability of research. Originating from this zeitgeist, the challenge to discuss critical issues on terminology, design, methods, and analysis considerations in fear conditioning research is taken up by this work, which involved representatives from fourteen of the major human fear conditioning laboratories in Europe. This compendium is intended to provide a basis for the development of a common procedural and terminology framework for the field of human fear conditioning. Whenever possible, we give general recommendations. When this is not feasible, we provide evidence-based guidance for methodological decisions on study design, outcome measures, and analyses. Importantly, this work is also intended to raise awareness and initiate discussions on crucial questions with respect to data collection, processing, statistical analyses, the impact of subtle procedural changes, and data reporting specifically tailored to the research on fear conditioning.

Background: C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP)/natriuretic peptide receptor 2 (NPR2) signaling is essential for long bone growth. Enhanced CNP production caused by chromosomal translocations results in tall stature, a Marfanoid phenotype, and skeletal abnormalities.Asimilar phenotype was described in a family with an activating NPR2 mutation within the guanylyl cyclase domain. Case: Here we describe an extremely tall male without skeletal deformities, with a novel NPR2 mutation (p.Arg655Cys) located in the kinase homology domain. Objectives: The objective of the study was to investigate the functional and structural effects of the NPR2 mutation. Methods: Guanylyl cyclase activities of wild-type vs mutant NPR2 were analyzed in transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and in skin fibroblasts. The former were also used to study possible interactions between both isoforms. Homology modeling was performed to understand the molecular impact of the mutation. Results: CNP-stimulated cGMP production by the mutant NPR2 was markedly increased in patient skin fibroblasts and transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The stimulatory effects of ATP on CNP-dependent guanylyl cyclase activity were augmented, suggesting that this novel mutation enhances both the responsiveness of NPR2 to CNP and its allosteric modulation/stabilization by ATP. Coimmunoprecipitation showed that wild-type and mutant NPR2 can form stable heterodimers, suggesting a dominant-positive effect. In accordance with augmented endogenous receptor activity, plasma N-terminal pro-CNP (a marker of CNP production in tissues) was reduced in the proband. Conclusions:Wereport the first activating mutation within the kinase homology domain of NPR2, resulting in extremely tall stature. Our observations emphasize the important role of this domain in the regulation of guanylyl cyclase activity and bone growth in response to CNP.

The purpose of this phase III clinical trial was to compare two different extracellular contrast agents, 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine, for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with known or suspected focal renal lesions. Using a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized study design, both contrast agents were compared in a total of 471 patients regarding their diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to correctly classify focal lesions of the kidney. To test for noninferiority the diagnostic accuracy rates for both contrast agents were compared with CT results based on a blinded reading. The average diagnostic accuracy across the three blinded readers ('average reader') was 83.7% for gadobutrol and 87.3% for gadopentate dimeglumine. The increase in accuracy from precontrast to combined precontrast and postcontrast MRI was 8.0% for gadobutrol and 6.9% for gadopentate dimeglumine. Sensitivity of the average reader was 85.2% for gadobutrol and 88.7% for gadopentate dimeglumine. Specificity of the average reader was 82.1% for gadobutrol and 86.1% for gadopentate dimeglumine. In conclusion, this study documents evidence for the noninferiority of a single i.v. bolus injection of 1.0 M gadobutrol compared with 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine in the diagnostic assessment of renal lesions with CE-MRI.