Search

The place of soluble biomarkers in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of hand osteoarthritis is not yet clear. In conclusion, treatment with etanercept reduced serum MMP3-levels, but not other soluble biomarkers of inflammation, bone, and cartilage damage in patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are increasingly common with a significant impact on individuals and society. Non-pharmacological treatments are considered essential to reduce pain and improve function and quality of life. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee OA were published in 2013. Given the large number of subsequent studies, an update is needed., Methods: The Standardised Operating Procedures for EULAR recommendations were followed. A multidisciplinary Task Force with 25 members representing 14 European countries was established. The Task Force agreed on an updated search strategy of 11 research questions. The systematic literature review encompassed dates from 1 January 2012 to 27 May 2022. Retrieved evidence was discussed, updated recommendations were formulated, and research and educational agendas were developed., Results: The revised recommendations include two overarching principles and eight evidence-based recommendations including (1) an individualised, multicomponent management plan; (2) information, education and self-management; (3) exercise with adequate tailoring of dosage and progression; (4) mode of exercise delivery; (5) maintenance of healthy weight and weight loss; (6) footwear, walking aids and assistive devices; (7) work-related advice and (8) behaviour change techniques to improve lifestyle. The mean level of agreement on the recommendations ranged between 9.2 and 9.8 (0-10 scale, 10=total agreement). The research agenda highlighted areas related to these interventions including adherence, uptake and impact on work., Conclusions: The 2023 updated recommendations were formulated based on research evidence and expert opinion to guide the optimal management of hip and knee OA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TPMVV was the Vice president EULAR health professionals 2020–2022 and is part of the EULAR Advocacy Committee 2020–present. MG holds a leadership position in OpenReuma/Spanish Association of Health Professionals in Rheumatology (unpaid). CDM received Grants from Versus Arthritis, MRC, NIHR (paid to Keele University) and is the director of the NIHR School for Primary Care Research. SL received payment as scientific consultant from Arthro Therapeutics AB and received payment from AstraZeneca as a member of DSMB. DC received grants from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/148420/2019 and Pfizer (ID 64165707). GZ received payment for expert testimony from Casa di Cura San Francesco, Verona and Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Orthotech and Jtech, payment for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from VIVENKO for Gruenenthal and Ethos for Angelini and holds other financial interests related to clinical practice as an orthopedic surgeon (performing total joint replacement, arthroscopies and other types of surgeries), either directly from private patients or indirectly from the health system or insurances acting as a private consultant. JEV has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Lilly Netherlands BV. TG has received paid honoraria for lectures by Abbvie, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, Berlin-Chemie/A. Menarini Bulgaria, Sandoz and received support for attending meetings by Abbvie, Pfizer and UCB. DW is an International Advisory Board Member of DRFZ (Germany) 2019–current and was the EULAR PARE Chair 2015–2017and an EULAR Vice President representing PARE 2017–2021., (© European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, EULAR 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-use. No derivatives. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Objective: Surgical denervation has been proposed as a treatment for pain in hand osteoarthritis (OA). This review aimed to summarise the available evidence and to propose a research agenda., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed up to September 2022. Two investigators independently identified studies that reported on denervation for OA of the proximal interphalangeal, distal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal or carpometacarpal joints. Quality of studies was assessed and study characteristics, patient characteristics, details of the surgical technique and outcomes of the surgery were extracted., Results: Of 169 references, 17 articles reporting on 384 denervations in 351 patients were selected. Sixteen case series reported positive outcomes with respect to pain, function and patient satisfaction. One non-randomised clinical trial reported no difference in outcome when comparing denervation of the first carpometacarpal (CMC I) joint to trapeziectomy. Adverse events were frequent, with sensory abnormalities occurring the most, followed by the need for revision surgery. All studies had significant risk of bias., Conclusion: Surgical denervation for pain in hand OA shows some promise, but the available evidence does not allow any conclusions of efficacy and higher-quality research is needed. Techniques should be harmonised and more data regarding how denervation compares to current usual care, other denervation methods or placebo in terms of outcomes and adverse events are needed., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK reports the following, all outside the current study: Grants from IMI-APPROACH and the Dutch Arthritis Society, paid to the institution. Royalties or licences from Wolters Kluwer and Springer Verlag, paid to the institution. Fees for consulting/advisory boards by Abbvie, Kiniksa, Galapagos, CHDR, Novartis, UCB, all paid to the institution. Payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Galapagos and Jansen, paid to the institution. Roles on the OARSI board (member), EULAR council (member advocacy committee EULAR) and presidency of the Dutch Society for Rheumatology. For the current study, MK reports funding from SKMS, paid to the institution., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To investigate whether biomarkers are modulated by prednisolone treatment in patients with hand OA and whether they can predict response to prednisolone., Methods: Biomarkers reflecting tissue turnover and inflammation [aggrecanase-derived neoepitope of arggecan (ARGS), MMP-derived neoepitope of type I collagen (C1M), MMP-derived neoepitope of type III collagen (C3M), marker of true type V collagen formation (PROC5), MMP-derived neoepitope of CRP (CRPM), citrullinated vimentin fragment (VICM), high-sensitivity (hsCRP)] were measured in sera from 78 patients with painful inflammatory hand OA, who were randomized between prednisolone or placebo treatment. Association of baseline biomarker levels with disease characteristics [visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, synovial thickening ultrasonography sum score and erosive OA] and OMERACT-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) response after 6 weeks were analysed with linear or logistic regression and adjusted for age, BMI and sex. Change in biomarker levels after 6 weeks was assessed with linear regression adjusted for baseline biomarker levels, age, BMI and sex., Results: For all patients (mean age 64 years, 79% female), there were no associations between biomarker levels and VAS finger pain or synovial thickening score at baseline. Patients with erosive hand OA had higher levels of C1M and hsCRP [adjusted geometric mean ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.49) and 1.91 (1.19, 3.06), respectively]. Biomarker levels did not decrease over time. There was no association between baseline biomarkers levels and OARSI response, except for CRPM [geometric mean ratio of 0.88 (0.77, 1.00)]., Conclusion: Erosive disease was associated with higher levels of C1M and hsCRP. Biomarker levels were not influenced by treatment with prednisolone. Current biomarkers were not associated with response to prednisolone in hand OA., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

The first EULAR provisional recommendations on the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in the context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), largely based on expert opinion, were published in June 2020. Since then, an unprecedented number of clinical studies have accrued in the literature. Several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for population-wide vaccination programmes in EULAR-affiliated countries. Studies regarding vaccination of patients with (inflammatory) RMDs have released their first results or are underway.EULAR found it opportune to carefully review to what extent the initially consensus expert recommendations stood the test of time, by challenging them with the recently accumulated body of scientific evidence, and by incorporating evidence-based advice on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. EULAR started a formal (first) update in January 2021, performed a systematic literature review according to EULAR's standard operating procedures and completed a set of updated overarching principles and recommendations in July 2021. Two points to consider were added in November 2021, because of recent developments pertaining to additional vaccination doses., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RBML received honoraria for lecturing and consultation from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, is chair of EULAR’s committee for the quality of care and is owner and director of Rheumatology Consultancy BV. RBML is chair of EULAR’s committee of quality of care. AN received honoraria for lectures and consulting form BMS, UCB, Chigai and Roche. JWJB received honoraria for lectures and consulting from Fresnius, Galapagos, Syneos. GRB received honoraria for lectures and consulting from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, UCB. RC received honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, Janssen, Roche, Sanofi. BC received honoraria for lecturing and consultation from AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai. RC received honoraria for lectures and consulting or travel support from AbbVie, Janssen, Nordic Pharma, Roche and Sanofi. JRC received research grants and consulting from Amgen, AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and chairs the ACR COVID Vaccine Guidance Task Force. OE received honoraria for lecturing and consultation from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and B.I. MWH Consultation and speaker’s fees from ALK and Roche. LH received a speaker’s fee from Grünenthal, honoraria for writing articles from MedMedia, and travel support from AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis and Roche. AI received consultancies, honoraria, speaker-fees from AbbVie, MSD, Alfasigma, Celltrion, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Genzyme, Pfizer, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, SOBI and research grants from MSD, Alfasigma, AbbVie. AI is acting president of EULAR. JDI received research grants from Pfizer, Janssen and GSK and honoraria for lectures, conference support from Eli Lilly and Gilead, and speaker/consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Roche and UCB. XM received consulting fees from BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Samsung, UCB. BC received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB; and research grants from Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. IBM received research grants from Lilly, Pfizer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen; and consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB. IBM is past president of EULAR. HS-K received honoraria for lectures and consulting from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche and UCB. JSS received grants to his institution from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer and Roche and provided expert advice for, or had symposia speaking engagements with, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO Pharma, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB. JSS is editor of the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. KW received honoraria and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Lilly, Roche, GSK, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, UCB, Janssen, Regeneron and Sanofi. VN-C received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. PMM received consulting/speaker’s fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pain is common in hand osteoarthritis (OA) and multiple types may occur. We investigated the prevalence, associated patient characteristics, influence on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and response to anti-inflammatory treatment of neuropathic-like pain in inflammatory hand OA., Methods: Data were analysed from a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating prednisolone treatment in 92 patients with painful inflammatory hand OA. Neuropathic-like pain was measured with the painDETECT questionnaire. Associations between baseline characteristics and baseline neuropathic-like pain were analysed with ordinal logistic regression, association of baseline neuropathic-like pain symptoms with baseline HR-QoL with linear regression, painDETECT and visual analogue scale (VAS) change from baseline to week 6 and interaction of painDETECT with prednisolone efficacy on VAS pain change from baseline to week 6 with generalized estimating equations (GEE)., Results: Of 91 patients (79% female, mean age 64) with complete painDETECT data at baseline, 53% were unlikely to have neuropathic-like pain, 31% were indeterminate and 16% were likely to have neuropathic-like pain. Neuropathic-like pain was associated with female sex, less radiographic damage and more comorbidities. Patients with neuropathic-like pain had lower HR-QoL (PCS-6.5 [95% CI -10.4 to -2.6]) than those without. Neuropathic-like pain symptoms remained under prednisolone treatment and no interaction was seen between painDETECT and prednisolone efficacy on VAS pain., Conclusions: In this study, 16% of inflammatory hand OA patients had neuropathic-like pain. They were more often female, had more comorbidities and had lower QoL than those without. Neuropathic-like pain symptoms remained despite prednisolone treatment and did not seem to affect the outcome of prednisolone treatment., Significance: Pain is the dominant symptom in hand OA, with an unclear aetiology. In this study, we found that neuropathic-like pain may play a role in hand OA, that it showed associations with female sex, younger age and more comorbidities and that it lowered health-related quality of life in hand OA. Neuropathic-like pain in hand OA seems resistant to prednisolone therapy but did not seem to interfere with the treatment of inflammatory pain with prednisolone., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC®.)

Objectives: Agreement between real-time and static ultrasonography has not been studied in musculoskeletal diseases. We studied this agreement in inflammatory hand OA., Methods: Ultrasonography was performed blinded to clinical information of 30 joints of 75 patients with hand OA, treated with prednisolone in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Images were scored real-time at acquisition and stored images were scored static (paired in known chronological order) for inflammatory features and osteophytes (score 0-3). Agreement between methods was studied at joint level with quadratic weighted kappa. At patient level intra-class correlations (ICC) of sum scores and change in sum-scores (delta baseline-week 6) were calculated. Responsiveness of scoring methods was analysed with generalized estimating equations (GEE) with treatment as independent and ultrasonography findings as dependent variable., Results: Agreement at baseline was good to excellent at joint level (kappa 0.72-0.88) and moderate to excellent at patient level (ICC 0.58-0.91). Agreement for change in sum scores was poor to fair for synovial thickening and effusion (ICC 0.18 and 0.34, respectively), while excellent for Doppler signal (ICC 0.80). Real-time ultrasonography discriminated between prednisolone and placebo with a mean between-group difference of synovial thickening of -2.5 (95% CI: -4.7, -0.3). Static ultrasonography did not show a decrease in synovial thickening., Conclusion: While cross-sectional agreement between real-time and static ultrasonography is good, static ultrasonography measurement of synovial thickening did not show responsiveness to prednisone therapy while real-time ultrasonography did. Therefore, when ultrasonography is used in clinical trials, real-time dynamic scoring should remain the standard for now., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Perform a systematic literature review (SLR) on risk and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)., Methods: Literature was searched up to 31 May 2021, including (randomised) controlled trials and observational studies with patients with RMD. Pending quality assessment, data extraction was performed and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Quality assessment required provision of (1) an appropriate COVID-19 case definition, and (2a) a base incidence (for incidence data) or (2b) a comparator, >10 cases with the outcome and risk estimates minimally adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities (for risk factor data)., Results: Of 5165 records, 208 were included, of which 90 passed quality assessment and data were extracted for incidence (n=42), risk factor (n=42) or vaccination (n=14). Most studies had unclear/high RoB. Generally, patients with RMDs do not face more risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 (n=26 studies) or worse prognosis of COVID-19 (n=14) than individuals without RMDs. No consistent differences in risk of developing (severe) COVID-19 were found between different RMDs (n=19). Disease activity is associated with worse COVID-19 prognosis (n=2), possibly explaining the increased risk seen for glucocorticoid use (n=13). Rituximab is associated with worse COVID-19 prognosis (n=7) and possibly Janus kinase inhibitors (n=3). Vaccination is generally immunogenic, though antibody responses are lower than in controls. Vaccine immunogenicity is negatively associated with older age, rituximab and mycophenolate., Conclusion: This SLR informed the July 2021 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of RMDs in the context of SARS-CoV-2., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RBML received honoraria for lecturing and consultation from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB and is the owner and director of Rheumatology Consultancy BV. PMM received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript, and is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the (UK) National Health Service, the NIHR or the (UK) Department of Health. VN-C received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Physical function is one of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core outcome domains for hand osteoarthritis studies. Our aim was to select appropriate instrument(s) to measure this domain, as part of the development of a core outcome measurement set., Methods: Following the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection process, the (function subscale of) the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were assessed for domain match, feasibility, truth and discrimination. Data gathered from available literature, working group and patient surveys, and additional analyses in two hand osteoarthritis cohorts were used to inform a consensus process. Results were summarized in Summary of Measurements Properties tables and reviewed by the OMERACT technical advisory group., Results: MHQ passed the assessment of domain match and feasibility by the working group and patient research partners. For AUSCAN important limitations in feasibility were noted, but domain match was good. FIHOA did not pass the assessment and was not taken through the follow-up assessment. Based on published literature, reliability and construct/longitudinal validity of both MHQ and AUSCAN fulfilled OMERACT standards. While clinical trial discrimination and thresholds of meaning were good for AUSCAN, results for MHQ were ambiguous., Conclusion: MHQ was provisionally endorsed as OMERACT core outcome measure for the core domain physical function. While AUSCAN may have better metric properties than MHQ, it received provisional endorsement as a second measure of function due to important feasibility issues. A research agenda to merit full endorsement was set., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest AA reports grants from AstraZeneca, Oxford Immunotech; royalties from Uptodate; consulting fees from inflazome, NGM Biopharmaceuticals; honoraria from Menarini; and support from Pfizer; all outside the submitted work. FBe reports personal fees from Boehringer, Bone Therapeutics, CellProthera, Expanscience, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Merck Sereno, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Regulaxis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Peptinov, 4P Pharma, 4Moving Biotech, and grants from TRB Chemedica; all outside the submitted work. FBl reports grants from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants from UCB, grants from Bristol-Mayers Squibb, grants from Roche, grants from Servier, grants from Bioiberica, grants from Sanofie, grants from Grunenthal, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants from Lilly, grants from Janssen, grants from Regeneron, grants from Amgen, and grants from TRB Chemedica; all outside the submitted work. DB reports to be on the executive of OMERACT and Technical Advisory Group, and is involved in supporting upper limb outcome measures (none that were considered here). PC reports personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from EMD Serono, personal fees from Flexion Therapeutics, personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer; all outside the submitted work. KD reports grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). TS reports personal fees from AbbVie, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Takeda; all outside the submitted work. IKH reports personal fees from AbbVie, grants from Pfizer, and personal fees from Novartis; all outside the submitted work. DvdH reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB Pharma; all outside the submitted work; and is Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV. MK reports grants from Dutch Arthritis Association, during the conduct of the study, fee for consultancy (Abbvie, Pfizer, Levicept, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck-Serono, Kiniksa, Flexion, Galapagos, CHDR) and local investigator of industry-driven trial (Abbvie), from Wolters Kluwer (UptoDate), Springer Verlag (Reumatologie en klinische immunologie), grants from Pfizer, grants from IMI-APPROACH; all outside the submitted work. LM reports to be a paid staff member of OMERACT and helped develop the methodology applied within this manuscript. FK, CH, MI, VR, and RW have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the two-year course of pain and osteoarthritic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the thumb base., Methods: Patients in the Hand Osteoarthritis in Secondary Care (HOSTAS) cohort who had received radiographic examination, MRI, and clinical examination of the right thumb base at baseline and who had a 2-year follow-up period were studied. Pain on palpation of the thumb base was assessed on a 0-3 scale. MRIs were analyzed with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) thumb base osteoarthritis MRI scoring system for synovitis, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), subchondral bone defects, cartilage space loss, osteophytes, and subluxation. Radiographs were assessed for osteophytes and joint space narrowing. We studied the associations of changes in synovitis and BMLs with changes in pain using a logistic regression model adjusted for radiographic damage, with values expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs)., Results: Of 165 patients, 83% were women and the mean age was 60.7 years. At baseline, 65 patients had thumb base pain. At 2-year follow-up, pain had decreased in 32 patients and increased in 33 patients. MRI features remained stable in most patients. Structural MRI features generally deteriorated, while synovitis and BMLs improved in some individuals and deteriorated in others. Change in radiographic osteophytes rarely occurred (n = 10). Increased synovitis (odds ratio [OR] 3.4 [95% CI 1.3-9.3]) and increased BMLs (OR 5.1 [95% CI 2.1-12.6]) were associated with increased pain. Decreased BMLs appeared to be associated with decreased pain (OR 2.7 [95% CI 0.8-8.9]), and reductions in synovitis occurred too infrequently to calculate associations., Conclusion: Over 2 years, thumb base pain fluctuated, while MRI features changed in a minority of patients with hand osteoarthritis. Changes in synovitis and BMLs were associated with changes in pain on palpation, even after adjustment for radiographic damage., (© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To explore the use of lipidomics for prediction of prednisolone treatment response in patients with inflammatory hand osteoarthritis., Design: The Hand Osteoarthritis Prednisolone Efficacy (HOPE) study included patients (n ​= ​92) with symptomatic inflammatory hand osteoarthritis, fulfilling the ACR criteria. The present analyses comprised only patients randomized to prednisolone treatment (10 ​mg daily, n ​= ​40). Response to prednisolone treatment was defined according to the OARSI-OMERACT responder criteria at six weeks. Baseline blood samples were obtained non-fasted. Lipid species were quantified in erythrocytes with the Lipidyzer™ platform (Sciex). Oxylipins were analyzed in plasma using an in-house LC-MS/MS platform. Elastic net regularized regression was used to predict prednisolone treatment response based on common patient characteristics alone and including the patients' lipid profile. ROC analyses with 1000 bootstrapped area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine the discriminatory accuracy of the models., Results: Among included patients, 78% fulfilled the OARSI-OMERACT responder criteria. From the general patient characteristics, elastic net selected baseline hand function as only predictor of treatment response, with an AUC of 0.78 (0.56; 0.97). Addition of lipidomics resulted in an AUC of 0.92 (0.78; 0.99) and 0.85 (0.65; 0.98) for inclusion of the Lipidyzer™ platform and oxylipin platform, respectively., Conclusion: Our results suggest that the patients' lipid profile may improve the discriminative accuracy of the prediction of prednisolone treatment response in patients with inflammatory hand osteoarthritis compared to prediction by commonly measured patient characteristics alone. Hence, lipidomics may be a promising field for biomarker discovery for prediction of anti-inflammatory treatment response., Competing Interests: ML and MK report support from the 10.13039/501100010767Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under Grant Agreement n° 115,770, paid to the institution. In addition, MK reports research grants from the Dutch Arthritis Society, Pfizer, consultancy fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Levicept, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Serono, and royalty fees from UpToDate, all paid to her department, and she was the local investigator of an industry-driven trial (run by AbbVie). MGi received support from the H2020 ITN grant ArthritisHeal (#812890) and the 10.13039/501100003246NWO project 184.034.019. MG is an early stage researcher in the 10.13039/100010662H2020 funded EU ITN project 371 ArthritisHeal (#812890). All other authors declare no competing interests., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Colchicine may offer relief in osteoarthritis. This has never been investigated for hand osteoarthritis., Objectives: To investigate the effect of 1 mg daily colchicine vs placebo on hand pain and function over 12 weeks in older adults with hand osteoarthritis., Methods: Community-dwelling adults with diagnosed osteoarthritis of the hand aged 40-80 years were randomised to receive colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily) or matching placebo. Primary outcome measure was VAS hand pain score (0-100 mm). Secondary outcome measures included tender and swollen joint count, grip strength, C-reactive protein, and Michigan Hand Questionnaire total, function and pain scores. In an exploratory assessment, we compared synovial grade and power Doppler. All outcome measures were obtained at baseline and week 12. Stata v16 was used to perform constrained longitudinal data analysis models., Results: 64 adults (54 females, 10 males) aged 48-79 years of age were enrolled. 59 participants completed the study (N = 28 colchicine, N = 31 placebo) (withdrawal rate 8%). Adverse reactions to the study medication occurred in nine patients. VAS score was not significantly different at baseline (61 ± 17 mm in the colchicine, 64 ± 17 mm in the placebo group). Between-group difference for VAS score at week 12 was 7.6 mm (95% CI -3.5-18.7, p-value 0.18). There were no significant differences between groups for any secondary outcomes at baseline or week 12., Conclusions: 1 mg colchicine daily for 12 weeks was not effective for reducing pain, tender and swollen joint count or increasing grip strength in symptomatic hand osteoarthritis. Our results do not support the use of colchicine in hand osteoarthritis., (Copyright © 2020 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

It is essential to measure lipid biomarkers with a high reproducibility to prevent biased results. We compared the lipid composition and inter-day reproducibility of lipid measurements in plasma and erythrocytes. Samples from 42 individuals (77% women, mean age 65 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 27 kg/m 2 ), obtained non-fasted at baseline and after 6 weeks, were used for quantification of up to 1000 lipid species across 13 lipid classes with the Lipidyzer platform. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to investigate the variability of lipid concentrations between timepoints. The ICC distribution of lipids in plasma and erythrocytes were compared using Wilcoxon tests. After data processing, the analyses included 630 lipids in plasma and 286 in erythrocytes. From these, 230 lipids overlapped between sample types. In plasma, 78% of lipid measurements were reproduced well to excellently, compared to 37% in erythrocytes. The ICC score distribution in plasma (median ICC 0.69) was significantly better than in erythrocytes (median ICC 0.51) ( p -value < 0.001). At the class level, reproducibility in plasma was superior for triacylglycerols and cholesteryl esters while ceramides, diacylglycerols, (lyso)phosphatidylethanolamines, and sphingomyelins showed better reproducibility in erythrocytes. Although in plasma overall reproducibility was superior, differences at individual and class levels may favor the use of erythrocytes.

Objective: To improve the interpretation of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in individual patients, we explored associations with age, sex, BMI, history of knee injury and presence of clinical knee osteoarthritis, and developed percentile curves., Methods: We used cross-sectional data of middle-aged individuals from the population-based Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity (NEO) study. Clinical knee osteoarthritis was defined using the ACR classification criteria. KOOS scores were handled according to the manual (zero = extreme problems, 100 = no problems). Patient characteristics associated with KOOS were explored using ordered logistic regression, and sex and body mass index (BMI)-specific percentile curves were developed using quantile regression with fractional polynomials. The curves were applied as a benchmark for comparison of KOOS scores of participants with knee osteoarthritis and comorbidities., Results: The population consisted of 6,643 participants (56% women, mean (SD) age 56(6) years). Population-based KOOS subscale scores (median; interquartile range) near optimum: pain (100;94-100), symptoms (96;86-100), ADL function (100;96-100), sport/recreation function (100;80-100), quality of life (100;75-100). Worse KOOS scores were observed in women and in participants with higher BMI. Clinical knee osteoarthritis was defined in 15% of participants, and was, in comparison to other patient characteristics, associated with the highest odds of worse KOOS scores. Furthermore, presence of any comorbidity and cardiovascular disease specifically, was associated with worse KOOS scores, particularly in women., Conclusions: In the middle-aged Dutch population KOOS scores were generally good, but worse in women and with higher BMI. These percentile curves may be used as benchmarks in research and clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate self-reported and assessor-reported joint counts for pain and their value in measuring pain and joint activity in hand OA patients., Methods: A total of 524 patients marked painful joints on hand diagrams. Nurses assessed tenderness upon palpation. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale pain and the Australian/Canadian hand OA index subscale pain. Synovitis and bone marrow lesions in right hand distal/proximal interphalangeal joints on MRI served as measure of joint activity. Agreement was assessed on the patient (intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot) and joint level (percentage absolute agreement). Correlations with measures of pain and joint activity were analysed, and joint level associations with synovitis/bone marrow lesions were calculated., Results: Self-reported painful joint count (median 8, interquartile range 4-13) was consistently higher than assessor-reported tender joint count (3, 1-7). Agreement between patients and nurses on overall scores was low. Percentage absolute agreement on the joint level was 61-89%. Joint counts correlated similarly but weakly with measures of pain and joint activity (r = 0.14-0.38). On the joint level, assessor-reported tenderness was more strongly associated with synovitis/bone marrow lesions than self-reported pain., Conclusion: In hand OA, self- and assessor-reported joint counts cannot be used interchangeably, and measure other pain aspects than questionnaires. Assessor-reported tenderness was most closely related to MRI-defined joint activity., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To investigate associations of leptin and adiponectin levels with knee and hand osteoarthritis, and explore whether these mediate the association between adiposity and osteoarthritis., Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the population-based Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study. Adiposity was assessed with body mass index (BMI) and percentage total body fat (%TBF). Osteoarthritis, defined as hand or knee osteoarthritis, was determined using American College of Rheumatology criteria. Fasting serum adipokine levels were measured using immunoassays. Associations between adiposity and osteoarthritis were examined with logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity and education, and additionally for leptin and adiponectin as potential mediators., Results: In 6408 participants (56% women, median age 56 years), prevalence of osteoarthritis was 22% (10% isolated knee and 8% isolated hand osteoarthritis). Leptin levels were positively associated with osteoarthritis, while adiponectin levels were not. Leptin partially mediated the association of adiposity with osteoarthritis (OR 1.40 (95%CI 1.30; 1.52) attenuated to 1.38 (1.24; 1.54) per 5 units BMI and OR 1.25 (1.17; 1.35) to 1.20 (1.10; 1.32) per 5 units %TBF, representing 4% and 17% mediation, respectively). Larger proportion mediation by leptin was found in knee (13%/27%) than in hand osteoarthritis (9%/18%). Sex-stratified analyses generally showed stronger associations between adiposity, leptin and osteoarthritis in women than in men., Conclusions: Serum leptin levels were associated with osteoarthritis, and partially mediated the association between adiposity and osteoarthritis, while adiponectin levels were not associated with osteoarthritis. These findings provide evidence for systemic effects of adipose tissue in osteoarthritis., (Copyright © 2019 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hand osteoarthritis is a prevalent joint condition that has a high burden of disease and an unmet medical need for effective therapeutic options. Since local inflammation is recognised as contributing to osteoarthritic complaints, the Hand Osteoarthritis Prednisolone Efficacy (HOPE) study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-term prednisolone in patients with painful hand osteoarthritis and synovial inflammation., Methods: The HOPE study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. We recruited eligible adults from rheumatology outpatient clinics at two sites in the Netherlands. Patients were considered eligible if they had symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and signs of inflammation in their distal and proximal interphalangeal (DIP/PIP) joints. For inclusion, patients were required to have four or more DIP/PIP joints with osteoarthritic nodes; at least one DIP/PIP joint with soft swelling or erythema; at least one DIP/PIP joint with a positive power Doppler signal or synovial thickening of at least grade 2 on ultrasound; and finger pain of at least 30 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) that flared up during a 48-h non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) washout (defined as worsening of finger pain by at least 20 mm on the VAS). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 10 mg prednisolone or placebo orally once daily for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week tapering scheme, and a 6-week follow-up without study medication. The patients and study team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was finger pain, assessed on a VAS, at 6 weeks in participants who had been randomly assigned to groups and attended the baseline visit. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, number NTR5263., Findings: We screened patients for enrolment between Dec 3, 2015, and May 31, 2018. Patients completed baseline visits and started treatment between Dec 14, 2015, and July 2, 2018, and the last study visit of the last patient was Oct 4, 2018. Of 149 patients assessed for eligibility, 57 (38%) patients were excluded (predominantly because they did not meet one or several inclusion criteria, most often because of an absence of synovial inflammation or of flare-ups after NSAID washout) and 92 (62%) patients were eligible for inclusion. We randomly assigned 46 (50%) patients to receive prednisolone and 46 (50%) patients to receive placebo, all of whom were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis of the primary endpoint. 42 (91%) patients in the prednisolone group and 42 (91%) in the placebo group completed the 14-week study. The mean change between baseline and week 6 on VAS-reported finger pain was -21·5 (SD 21·7) in the prednisolone group and -5·2 (24·3) in the placebo group, with a mean between-group difference (of prednisolone vs placebo) of -16·5 (95% CI -26·1 to -6·9; p=0·0007). The number of non-serious adverse events was similar between the groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during our study: one serious adverse event in the prednisolone group (a myocardial infarction) and four serious adverse events in the placebo group (an infected traumatic leg haematoma that required surgery, bowel surgery, atrial fibrillation that required a pacemaker implantation, and symptomatic uterine myomas that required a hysterectomy). Four (4%) patients discontinued the study because of an adverse event: one (2%) patient receiving prednisolone (for a myocardial infarction) and three (7%) patients receiving placebo (for surgery of the bowel and for an infected leg haematoma and for Lyme disease arthritis of the knee)., Interpretation: Treatment with 10 mg prednisolone for 6 weeks is efficacious and safe for the treatment of patients with painful hand osteoarthritis and signs of inflammation. The results of our study provide clinicians with a new short-term treatment option for patients with hand osteoarthritis who report a flare-up of their disease., Funding: Dutch Arthritis Society., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate hand osteoarthritis tools for core instrument set development., Methods: For OMERACT 2018, a systematic literature review and advances in instrument validation were presented., Results: Visual analog and numerical rating scales were considered valuable for pain and patient's global assessment, despite heterogeneous phrasing and missing psychometric evidence for some aspects. The Modified Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain scale was lacking evidence. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire had advantages above other pain/function questionnaires. The Hand Mobility in Scleroderma scale was valid, although responsiveness was questioned. Potential joint activity instruments were evaluated., Conclusion: The development of the core instrument set is progressing, and a research agenda was also developed.

Objective: To assess the longitudinal reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Thumb base Osteoarthritis Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Scoring system (TOMS)., Methods: Paired MRI of patients with hand osteoarthritis were scored in 2 exercises (6-mo and 2-yr followup) for synovitis, subchondral bone defects (SBD), osteophytes, cartilage assessment, bone marrow lesions (BML), and subluxation. Interreader reliability of delta scores was assessed., Results: Little change occurred. Average-measure intraclass correlation coefficients were good-excellent (≥ 0.71), except synovitis (0.55-0.83) and carpometacarpal-1 osteophytes/cartilage assessment (0.47/0.39). Percentage exact/close agreement was 52-92%/68-100%, except BML in 2 years (28%/64-76%). Smallest detectable change was below the scoring increment, except in SBD and BML., Conclusion: TOMS longitudinal reliability was moderate-good. Limited change hampered assessment.

Objective: To investigate the construct validity of the new thumb base OA magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system (TOMS) by comparing TOMS scores with radiographic scores in patients with primary hand OA., Design: In 200 patients (83.5% women, mean (SD) age 61.0 (8.4) years), postero-anterior radiographs and MR scans (1.5 T) of the right first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joints, were scored using the OARSI atlas and TOMS, respectively. The distributions of the TOMS scores (specified in results section) were stratified for the OARSI scores of corresponding radiographic features and investigated using boxplots and non-parametric tests. Furthermore, Spearman's rank or Phi correlation coefficients (ρ/φ) were calculated., Results: For all features, especially for erosions and osteophytes, the prevalence found with MRI was higher than with radiography. TOMS osteophyte and cartilage loss scores differed statistically significant between corresponding OARSI scores in CMC-1 (0 vs 1; 1 vs 2). TOMS scores were positively correlated with radiographic scores in CMC-1 for osteophytes (coefficient [95% confidence interval], ρ = 0.75 [0.69; 0.81]), cartilage loss/joint space narrowing (ρ = 0.70 [0.62; 0.76]), subchondral bone defects (SBDs)/erosion-cyst (ρ = 0.41 [0.29; 0.52]), bone marrow lesions (BMLs)/subchondral sclerosis (ρ = 0.65 [0.56; 0.73]) and subluxation (φ = 0.65 [0.57; 0.73]); and in STT for osteophytes (ρ = 0.30 [0.17; 0.42]) and cartilage loss/joint space narrowing (ρ = 0.53 [0.42; 0.62])., Conclusions: In patients with hand OA, TOMS scores positively correlated with radiographic scores, indicating good construct validity. However, the prevalence of features on MR images was higher compared to radiographs, suggesting that TOMS might be more sensitive than radiography. The clinical meaning of these extra MR detected cases is currently still unknown., (Copyright © 2018 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hand osteoarthritis is a prevalent disease with limited treatment options. Since joint inflammation is often present, we investigated tumour necrosis factor (TNF) as treatment target in patients with proven joint inflammation in a proof-of-concept study., Methods: This 1-year, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial (NTR1192) enrolled patients with symptomatic erosive inflammatory hand osteoarthritis. Patients flaring after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug washout were randomised to etanercept (24 weeks 50 mg/week, thereafter 25  mg/week) or placebo. The primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included clinical and imaging outcomes (radiographs scored using Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS, n=54) and MRIs (n=20))., Results: Of 90 patients randomised to etanercept (n=45) or placebo (n=45), respectively, 12 and 10 discontinued prematurely. More patients on placebo discontinued due to inefficacy (6 vs 3), but fewer due to adverse effects (1 vs 6). The mean between-group difference (MD) in VAS pain was not statistically significantly different (-5.7 (95% CI -15.9 to 4.5), p=0.27 at 24 weeks; - 8.5 (95% CI -18.6 to 1.6), p=0.10 at 1  year; favouring etanercept). In prespecified per-protocol analyses of completers with pain and inflammation at baseline (n=61), MD was -11.8 (95% CI -23.0 to -0.5) (p=0.04) at 1  year. Etanercept-treated joints showed more radiographic remodelling (delta GUSS: MD 2.9 (95% CI 0.5 to 5.4), p=0.02) and less MRI bone marrow lesions (MD -0.22 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.09), p = 0.001); this was more pronounced in joints with baseline inflammation., Conclusion: Anti-TNF did not relieve pain effectively after 24 weeks in erosive osteoarthritis. Small subgroup analyses showed a signal for effects on subchondral bone in actively inflamed joints, but future studies to confirm this are warranted., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK reports an unrestricted grant paid to the institution and study medication free of charge from Pfizer (Wyeth) during the conduct of the study, outside the submitted work. MK reports advisory board fees from Levicept, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, Merck and Pfizer, grants from IMI-EFPIA APPROACH, grants from Pfizer, and other from AbbVie. W-YK reports an unrestricted grant from Pfizer (Wyeth) during the conduct of the study. TWJH/Department of Rheumatology LUMC has received grants/lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Crescendo Bioscience and Eli Lilly. JSS reports grants from AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer and Roche, personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB, outside the submitted work. RWi reports having a patent GUSS issued., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To investigate the performance of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating truth, discrimination and feasibility., Design: Symptomatic hand OA patients from the Hand Osteoarthritis in Secondary Care (HOSTAS) cohort completed questionnaires (demographics, MHQ, Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index [AUSCAN], Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis [FIHOA] and visual analogue scale [VAS] pain) at baseline (n = 383), 1- and 2-year follow-up (n = 312, n = 293). Anchor questions at follow-up assessed whether pain/function levels were (un)acceptable and had changed compared to baseline. Correlations between MHQ and other pain/function questionnaires were calculated. Validity of unique MHQ domains (work performance, aesthetics, satisfaction), discrimination across disease stages, and responsiveness were assessed by categorizing patients by external anchors (employment, joint deformities, erosions, and anchor questions). Between-group differences were assessed with linear regression, probability plots and comparison of medians., Results: MHQ pain and function subscales correlated moderately-to-good with other instruments (r s 0.63-0.81). Work performance scores were worse in patients with reduced working capacity than in employed patients. Aesthetics scores were worse in patients with more deformities. Patients with unacceptable complaints had worse satisfaction scores. All pain/function instruments discriminated between patients with acceptable vs unacceptable pain/function, while only MHQ activities of daily living (ADL), FIHOA, and MHQ aesthetics could discriminate between erosive and non-erosive disease. MHQ and AUSCAN were most responsive., Conclusions: MHQ has several unique aspects and advantages justifying its use in hand OA, including the unique assessment of work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction. However, MHQ, AUSCAN and FIHOA appear to measure different aspects of pain and function., (Copyright © 2018 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of TNF inhibitors (TNFis) on incidental and progressive hand OA in recent-onset RA patients after a 10 year follow-up., Methods: Radiographs of 262 RA patients (mean age 52 years, 66% women) from the BeSt study were scored for osteophytes in DIP/PIP joints using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas (0-3; summed score 0-54) and according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score (0-4; summed score 0-72) at baseline and 10 year follow-up. TNFi treatment was assessed on visits every 3 months. Associations between TNFi treatment and hand OA were analysed on the patient and joint level using generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations, respectively., Results: Fifty-eight percent of the patients were treated with TNFi, with a median duration of 42 months. A total of 143 patients (55%) had hand OA in any IP joint at baseline based on the Osteoarthritis Research Society International osteophyte score. On the patient level, TNFi treatment duration did not affect incidental hand OA. However, every month of TNFi treatment resulted in a reduced relative risk (RR) of hand OA progression in DIP joints [relative risk (RR) 0.987 (95% CI 0.978, 0.996)] but not in PIP joints. On the joint level, the effect on hand OA progression was observed in DIP joints [RR 0.996 (95% CI 0.991, 1.000)] but not in PIP joints. The results from the KL score analyses were comparable to the osteophyte score., Conclusion: TNFi treatment was associated with a reduced risk on radiographic hand OA progression in DIP joints but not in PIP joints after 10 years. Although the effect sizes are small, these results provide evidence for influence of TNF-α in hand OA pathogenesis.

To update the evidence on efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical interventions for hand osteoarthritis (OA), a systematic literature review was performed up to June 2017, including (randomised) controlled trials or Cochrane systematic reviews. Main efficacy outcomes were pain, function and hand strength. Risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed when advisable. Of 7036 records, 127 references were included, of which 50 studies concerned non-pharmacological, 64 pharmacological and 12 surgical interventions. Many studies had high risk of bias, mainly due to inadequate randomisation or blinding. Beneficial non-pharmacological treatments included hand exercise and prolonged thumb base splinting, while single trials showed positive results for joint protection and using assistive devices. Topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) proved equally effective, while topical NSAIDs led to less adverse events. Single trials demonstrated positive results for chondroitin sulfate and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in interphalangeal joints. Pharmacological treatments for which no clear beneficial effect was shown include paracetamol, intra-articular thumb base injections of glucocorticoids or hyaluronic acid, low-dose oral glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine and anti-tumour necrosis factor. No trials compared surgery to sham or non-operative treatment. No surgical intervention for thumb base OA appeared more effective than another, although in general more complex procedures led to more complications. No interventions slowed radiographic progression. In conclusion, an overview of the evidence on efficacy and safety of treatment options for hand OA was presented and informed the task force for the updated European League Against Rheumatism management recommendations for hand OA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MK has received consultancy fees/fee as local investigator of industry driven trials from Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Levicept (all through institution), and has received research funding (through the institution) from Pfizer and APPROACH-IMI. LC has received research funding (through the institution) from Pharmaceutical laboratories (AbbVie Spain, Bristol Myers & Squibb, Celgene, Eisai Farmacéutica, Gebro Pharma, Grünenthal Pharma, LEO Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Novartis Farmaceutica, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi Aventis, UCB Pharma), Scientific societies (Academia de Dermatología y Venereología, Asociación Emeritense de Reumatología, Eular, Italian Society of Rheumatology, Sociedad Castellano-Manchega, SORCOM, SEDISA, SEIO, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, SERPE, Societat Catalana de Reumatología), Contract Research organisations (Scientia Salus, Continuing Medical Communication, Mediaevents AA, Congresos Eventos y Azafatas, Meed Comunicación, Proyectos Incentivos y Congresos), Research groups and Foundations (AIRE-MB, FISABIO, Fundació Parc Taulí, Fundación Asturcor, Fundación Clínic, Fundación de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears, Fundación Española de Reumatología, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Reumacare), Individual researchers (Dr Ramón Mazzuchelli, Dr Xavier Juanola, Dra Afnan Abdelkader), and is director of Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética.

Objective: Osteoarthritis in thumb base joints (first carpometacarpal (CMC-1), scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT)) is prevalent and disabling, yet focussed studies are scarce. Our aim was to investigate associations between ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammatory features, radiographic osteophytes, and thumb base pain in hand osteoarthritis patients., Design: Cross-sectional analyses were performed in cohorts with MRI (n = 202) and ultrasound measurements (n = 87). Pain upon thumb base palpation was assessed. Radiographs were scored for CMC-1/STT osteophytes. Synovial thickening, effusion and power Doppler signal in CMC-1 joints were assessed with ultrasound. MRIs were scored for synovitis and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in CMC-1 and STT joints using OMERACT-TOMS. Associations between ultrasound/MRI features, osteophytes, and thumb base pain were assessed. Interaction between MRI features and osteophytes was explored., Results: In 289 patients (mean age 60.2, 83% women) 139/376 thumb bases were painful. Osteophyte presence was associated with pain (MRI cohort: odds ratio (OR) 5.1 (2.7-9.8)). Ultrasound features were present in 25-33% of CMC-1 joints, though no associations were seen with pain. MRI-synovitis and BMLs grade ≥2 were scored in 25% and 43% of thumb bases, and positively associated with pain (OR 3.6 (95% CI 1.7-7.6) and 3.0 (1.6-5.5)). Associations attenuated after adjustment for osteophyte presence. Combined presence of osteophytes and MRI-synovitis had an additive effect., Conclusions: Ultrasonographic and MRI inflammatory features were often present in the thumb base. Osteophytes were more strongly associated with thumb base pain than inflammatory features, in contrast to findings in finger OA studies, supporting thumb base osteoarthritis as a distinct phenotype., (Copyright © 2018 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Subchondral bone abnormalities (SBAs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are observed frequently and associated with disease course in various musculoskeletal disorders. This review aims to map the existing knowledge of their underlying histological features, and to identify needs for future research., Design: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines until September 2017, including all studies correlating histological features to on MRI defined SBAs in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and degenerative disc disease (DDD). Two authors independently retrieved articles and assessed study quality., Results: A total of 21 studies (466 patients) correlated histological features to SBAs in OA (n = 13), RA (n = 3), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (n = 1) and DDD (n = 4). Reported changes in OA were substitution of normal subchondral bone with fibrosis and necrosis, and increased bone remodeling. In contrast, in RA, AS or DDD fibrosis was not reported and SBAs correlated to an increase in inflammatory cell number. In DDD necrosis was observed. Similar to OA, increased bone remodeling was shown in RA and DDD. The risk of bias assessment showed a lack in described patient criteria, blinding and/or adequate topographic correlation in approximately half of studies. There was heterogeneity regarding the investigated histological features between the different disorders., Conclusions: Current studies suggest that SBAs correlate to various histological features, including fibrosis, cell death, inflammation and bone remodeling. In the majority of studies most quality criteria were not met. Future studies should aim for high quality research, and consistency in investigated features between different disorders., (Copyright © 2018 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate metric properties of four hand mobility tests in hand OA patients, using the OMERACT filter., Methods: Trained assessors examined the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma test (HAMIS), fingertip-to-palm distance (FPD), modified Kapandji index (MKI) and number of hand joints with limited mobility in participants from two cohorts [Genetics ARthrosis and Progression (n = 207) and Hand OSTeoArthritis in Secondary care (n = 174)]. Validity was appraised by assessment of correlations with other outcome measures, and ability to measure thumb vs finger mobility specifically, using cumulative probability plots. The proportion of participants changing in hand mobility based on the smallest detectable difference was calculated for responsiveness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra- and interobserver reliability, and feasibility (time to perform tests) were studied in a random sample (n = 20)., Results: Participants displayed large variation in mobility scores. Strongest correlations were observed with structural damage (rs = 0.43-0.52) and bony swelling (rs = 0.46-0.58); correlation patterns were similar among tests. HAMIS, FPD and MKI could all measure finger mobility specifically, but only HAMIS measured thumb mobility particularly. Interobserver reliability was best for HAMIS, ICC 0.90 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.96); intraobserver reliability was excellent for all (ICCs 0.94-0.97). In 2 years, little change was observed; HAMIS was the most sensitive-to-change (smallest detectable difference 3.7% of maximum score). The mean performance time ranged from 0.7 (s.d. 0.5, for FPD) to 5.7 (s.d. 1.3, for HAMIS) min., Conclusion: HAMIS, FPD, MKI and number of joints with limited mobility are all valid, reliable and feasible measures for assessing hand mobility in hand OA, although HAMIS had slightly more favourable properties. Studies assessing sensitivity-to-change in a clinical trial setting are warranted., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

This paper presents an atlas for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) thumb base osteoarthritis MRI scoring system (TOMS). The atlas includes reference images of each grade of each feature that is assessed in TOMS (synovitis grade 0-3, subchondral bone defects grade 0-3, osteophytes grade 0-3, cartilage assessment grade 0-3, subluxation and bone marrow lesions grade 0-3) in the first carpometacarpal and scapho-trapezio-trapezoid joint. The presented reference images can be used to guide scoring of thumb base MRIs in patients with hand osteoarthritis according to the OMERACT TOMS., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Objective: Because the association and its clinical relevance between comorbidities and primary hand osteoarthritis (OA) disease burden is unclear, we studied this in patients with hand OA from our Hand OSTeoArthritis in Secondary care (HOSTAS) cohort., Methods: Cross-sectional data from the HOSTAS study were used, including consecutive patients with primary hand OA. Nineteen comorbidities were assessed: 18 self-reported (modified Charlson index and osteoporosis) and obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ). Mean differences were estimated between patients with versus without comorbidities, adjusted for age and sex: for general disease burden [health-related quality of life (HRQOL), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 physical component scale (0-100)] and disease-specific burden [self-reported hand function (0-36), pain (0-20; Australian/Canadian Hand OA Index), and tender joint count (TJC, 0-30)]. Differences above a minimal clinically important improvement/difference were considered clinically relevant., Results: The study included 538 patients (mean age 61 yrs, 86% women, 88% fulfilled American College of Rheumatology classification criteria). Mean (SD) HRQOL, function, pain, and TJC were 44.7 (8), 15.6 (9), 9.3 (4), and 4.8 (5), respectively. Any comorbidity was present in 54% (287/531) of patients and this was unfavorable [adjusted mean difference presence/absence any comorbidity (95% CI): HRQOL -4.4 (-5.8 to -3.0), function 1.9 (0.4-3.3), pain 1.4 (0.6-2.1), TJC 1.3 (0.4-2.2)]. Number of comorbidities and both musculoskeletal (e.g., connective tissue disease) and nonmusculoskeletal comorbidities (e.g., pulmonary and cardiovascular disease) were associated with disease burden. Associations with HRQOL and function were clinically relevant., Conclusion: Comorbidities showed clinically relevant associations with disease burden. Therefore, the role of comorbidities in hand OA should be considered when interpreting disease outcomes and in patient management.

Objective: To develop the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) thumb base osteoarthritis (OA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system (TOMS) for the assessment of inflammatory and structural abnormalities in this hand OA subset, and test its cross-sectional reliability., Methods: Included features and their scaling were agreed upon by members of the OMERACT MRI Task Force using the Hand OA MRI scoring system as a template. A reliability exercise was performed in which 3 readers participated, using a preliminary atlas with examples to facilitate reading. Each reader independently scored a set of 20 MRI (coronal and axial T1- and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images, of which 5 included T1-weighted fat-suppressed post-Gadolinium images). Intra- and inter-reader reliability were assessed using ICC, percentage exact agreement (PEA), and percentage close agreement (PCA)., Results: The TOMS assessed the first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joints for synovitis, subchondral bone defects (including erosions, cysts, and bone attrition), osteophytes, cartilage, and bone marrow lesions on a 0-3 scale (normal to severe). Subluxation was evaluated only in the CMC-1 joint (absent/present). Reliability of scoring for both joints was comparable. Interreader ICC were good for all features (0.77-0.99 and 0.74-0.96 for CMC-1 and STT joints, respectively). Intrareader reliability analyses gave similar results. PCA was ≥ 65% for all features. PEA was low to moderate, with better performance for subchondral bone defects, subluxation, and bone marrow lesions., Conclusion: A thumb base OA MRI scoring system has been developed. The OMERACT TOMS demonstrated good intrareader and interreader reliability. Longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate reliability of change scores and responsiveness.

Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is usually a polyarticular disease, preferentially affecting the thumb base (TB) and interphalangeal joints. TB OA alone is generally not addressed separately, but as a part of hand OA. Studies have shown that OA in the TB joints clusters together, as does OA in the interphalangeal joints, supporting it as a distinct subset. Further support for this view comes from a specific risk profile, influence on clinical burden, impact of synovial inflammation on local joint pain, and specific treatment interventions. Therefore, clinical care and future hand OA research should not only address hand OA in general but also should focus on the different subsets separately, including TB OA., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim was to establish reference curves of the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN), a widely used questionnaire assessing hand complaints., Methods: Analyses were performed in a population-based sample, The Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study (n = 6671, aged 45-65 years). Factors associated with AUSCAN scores were analysed with ordered logistic regression, because AUSCAN data were zero inflated, dividing AUSCAN into three categories (0 vs 1-5 vs >5). Age- and sex-specific reference curves for the AUSCAN (range 0-60; higher is worse) were developed using quantile regression in conjunction with fractional polynomials. Observed scores in relevant subgroups were compared with the reference curves., Results: The median age was 56 [interquartile range (IQR): 50-61] years; 56% were women and 12% had hand OA according to ACR criteria. AUSCAN scores were low (median 1; IQR: 0-4). Reference curves where higher for women, and increased moderately with age: 95% percentiles for AUSCAN in men and women were, respectively, 5.0 and 12.3 points for a 45-year-old, and 15.2 and 33.6 points for a 65-year-old individual. Additional associated factors included hand OA, inflammatory rheumatic diseases, FM, socio-economic status and BMI. Median AUSCAN pain subscale scores of women with hand OA lay between the 75th and 90th centiles of the general population., Conclusion: AUSCAN scores in the middle-aged Dutch population were low overall, and higher in women than in men. AUSCAN reference curves could serve as a benchmark in research and clinical practice settings. However, the AUSCAN does not measure hand complaints specific for hand OA., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)