1. One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference
- Author
-
Katrine Bovien Gørlitz, Esben Laugesen, Christian Trolle, Louise Jung Nørgård, Siv Lajlev, Michele Colombo, Mette Bohl, and Klavs Würgler Hansen
- Subjects
Cuff size ,bladder size ,blood pressure measurement ,oscillometry ,arm circumference ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Objective Some brachial cuffs for oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement are claimed to cover a wide range of upper-arm circumferences; however, their validation is rarely conducted. Our aim was to compare oscillometric BP measurements obtained with a universal cuff with those obtained with an appropriately sized cuff.Methods We utilised the Microlife B6 Connect monitor, conducting oscillometric BP measurements in a random sequence with both a universal cuff (recommended for arm circumferences from 22 to 42 cm) and an appropriately sized cuff (medium for circumference 22–32 cm and large for 32–42 cm). We included 91 individuals with an arm circumference of 22–32 cm and 64 individuals with an arm circumference of 32–42 cm.Results For arm circumferences > 32 cm, systolic and diastolic BP measured with the universal cuff was higher than that measured with the large cuff (systolic 6.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]). 3.9–8.8, diastolic 2.4 mmHg, 95%CI, 1.2–3.7, p
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF