Back to Search Start Over

Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial

Authors :
Niels H. Buus
Gratien Andersen
Christian Daugaard Peters
Per Løgstrup Poulsen
Erling B. Pedersen
Ulla Kampmann
Ole N. Mathiassen
Hans Rickers
Jannik B. Bertelsen
Sten Langfeldt
Anne Pauline Schroeder
Morten Engholm
Anne Kaltoft
Henrik Vase
Ole Lederballe
Hans E. Btker
Kent L. Christensen
Jesper N. Bech
Jens Flensted Lassen
Klavs Würgler Hansen
Source :
Mathiassen, O N, Vase, H, Bech, J N, Christensen, K L, Buus, N H, Schroeder, A P, Lederballe, O, Rickers, H, Kampmann, U, Poulsen, P L, Hansen, K W, Bøtker, H E, Peters, C D, Engholm, M, Bertelsen, J B, Lassen, J F, Langfeldt, S, Andersen, G, Pedersen, E B & Kaltoft, A 2016, ' Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial ', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1639-1647 . https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP.METHOD: We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA).RESULTS: We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ± 12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ± 14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [-6.2 ± 18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. -6.0 ± 13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [-6.1 ± 18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. -4.3 ± 15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ± 2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ± 2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial.CONCLUSION: Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Mathiassen, O N, Vase, H, Bech, J N, Christensen, K L, Buus, N H, Schroeder, A P, Lederballe, O, Rickers, H, Kampmann, U, Poulsen, P L, Hansen, K W, Bøtker, H E, Peters, C D, Engholm, M, Bertelsen, J B, Lassen, J F, Langfeldt, S, Andersen, G, Pedersen, E B & Kaltoft, A 2016, ' Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial ', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1639-1647 . https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....07b8d5e889dee69938282ae54414054d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977