Back to Search
Start Over
Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial
- Source :
- Mathiassen, O N, Vase, H, Bech, J N, Christensen, K L, Buus, N H, Schroeder, A P, Lederballe, O, Rickers, H, Kampmann, U, Poulsen, P L, Hansen, K W, Bøtker, H E, Peters, C D, Engholm, M, Bertelsen, J B, Lassen, J F, Langfeldt, S, Andersen, G, Pedersen, E B & Kaltoft, A 2016, ' Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial ', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1639-1647 . https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP.METHOD: We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA).RESULTS: We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ± 12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ± 14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [-6.2 ± 18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. -6.0 ± 13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [-6.1 ± 18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. -4.3 ± 15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ± 2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ± 2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial.CONCLUSION: Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Physiology
medicine.medical_treatment
Urology
Coronary Vasospasm
Blood Pressure
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Kidney
Essential hypertension
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Double-Blind Method
Randomized controlled trial
law
Internal Medicine
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Sympathectomy
Antihypertensive Agents
Aged
Denervation
business.industry
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Surgery
medicine.anatomical_structure
Blood pressure
Coronary vasospasm
Hypertension
Ambulatory
Catheter Ablation
Female
Essential Hypertension
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Mathiassen, O N, Vase, H, Bech, J N, Christensen, K L, Buus, N H, Schroeder, A P, Lederballe, O, Rickers, H, Kampmann, U, Poulsen, P L, Hansen, K W, Bøtker, H E, Peters, C D, Engholm, M, Bertelsen, J B, Lassen, J F, Langfeldt, S, Andersen, G, Pedersen, E B & Kaltoft, A 2016, ' Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial ', Journal of Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1639-1647 . https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....07b8d5e889dee69938282ae54414054d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000977