Search

Background: Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation (PFR) is effective in a selection of patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal cancer surgery. This study aimed to identify barriers and enablers to prepare for successful implementation into clinical practice. Methods: A qualitative study was performed, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Individual interviews (n = 27) and two focus groups were conducted to synthesize the perspectives of rectal cancer patients, pelvic floor (PF) physiotherapists, and medical experts. Results: Barriers were found to be the absence of guidelines about LARS treatment, underdeveloped network care, suboptimal patient information, and expectation management upfront to PFR. Financial status is frequently a barrier because insurance companies do not always reimburse PFR. Enablers were the current level of evidence for PFR, the positive relationship between patients and PF physiotherapists, and the level of self-motivation by patients. Conclusion: The factors identified in our study play a crucial role in ensuring a successful implementation of PFR after rectal cancer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery is common, with some experiencing low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common after rectal cancer surgery. This study examined if transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has a similar risk of LARS and altered quality of life (QoL) as patients who undergo low anterior resection (LAR). Methods: Patients who underwent TaTME or traditionally approached total mesorectal excision in a prospective colorectal cancer cohort study (2014-2019) were propensity score matched in a 1 : 1 ratio. LARS and QoL scores were assessed before and after surgery with a primary endpoint of major LARS at 12 months analysed for possible association between factors by logistic regression. Results: Of 61 TaTME and 317 LAR patients eligible, 55 from each group were propensity score matched. Higher LARS scores (30.6 versus 25.4, P=0.010) and more major LARS (65 versus 42 per cent, P=0.013; OR 2.64, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 5.71) were reported after TaTME. Additionally, QoL score differences (body image, bowel frequency, and embarrassment) were worse in the TaTME group. Conclusions: TaTME may be associated with more severe bowel dysfunction than traditional approaches to rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) after low anterior resection (LAR) at one-year follow-up., Summary Background Data: After LAR, with restoration of bowel continuity, up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction, significantly impacting their quality of life. However, standardized treatment is currently unavailable. The FORCE trial demonstrated the beneficial effects of PFR after three months regarding specific domains of the Fecal Incontinence QoL (FIQL) questionnaire and urgency compared to usual care., Methods: The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. All patients undergoing LAR were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a standardized PFR program. The primary outcome measure is the Wexner incontinence score, and the secondary endpoints included the LARS score, the EORTC colorectal-specific QoL questionnaire, and health- and fecal incontinence-related QoL. Assessments were conducted at baseline before randomization, at three months and one-year follow-ups., Results: A total of 86 patients were included (PFR: n=40, control: n=46). After one year, PFR did not significantly improve Wexner incontinence scores (PFR: -3.33, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.26, control: -2.54, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.54, P=0.30). Similar to the three-month follow-up, patients without near-complete incontinence at baseline showed sustained improvement in fecal incontinence (PFR: -2.82, 95% CI -3.86 to -1.76, control: -1.43, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.50, P=0.06). Significant improvement was reported in the FIQL domains Lifestyle (PFR: 0.51, control: -0.13, P=0.03) and Coping and Behavior (PFR: 0.40, control: -0.24, P=0.01)., Conclusion: At one-year follow-up, no significant differences were found in fecal incontinence scores; however, PFR was associated with improved fecal incontinence related QoL compared to usual care., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Artifacts caused by respiratory motion or ventilation-induced chest movements are a major problem for thoracic MRI, as they can obscure important anatomical structures such as lymph node metastases. We compared image quality of routine breathhold with intermittent apnea during controlled mechanical ventilation of patients under general anesthesia as the ideal situation without respiratory motion in the detection and characterization of regional lymph nodes in esophageal cancer., Methods: In this prospective study, 10 patients treated for esophageal cancer underwent ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI scans. Before neoadjuvant therapy, MRI scans were acquired with a routine breathhold technique. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients were scanned under general anesthesia immediately prior to surgery with controlled mechanical ventilation. The image quality was compared using a Likert scale questionnaire based on visibility of anatomical structures and image artifacts., Results: MRI with controlled mechanical ventilation and prolonged controlled apnea of 4 min was safe and feasible. All cardio-respiratory monitoring parameters remained stable during the apnea phases. Mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph nodes down to 2 mm in size could be visualized with all sequences. All image quality criteria, including visibility of thoracic structures and regional lymph nodes were scored higher using the controlled ventilation sequences compared to the routine breathhold phase., Conclusion: USPIO-enhanced MRI with controlled mechanical ventilation is superior to routine breathhold MRI in visualizing lymph nodes, which warrants new motion reduction techniques to use MRI for the detection of lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal cancer., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: After low anterior resection (LAR), up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction. Especially fecal incontinence has a major impact on the physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning of the patient but also on the Dutch National Healthcare budget with more than €2000 spent per patient per year. No standardized treatment is available to help these patients. Common treatment nowadays is focused on symptom relief, consisting of lifestyle advices and pharmacotherapy with bulking agents or antidiarrheal medication. Another possibility is pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR), which is one of the most important treatments for fecal incontinence in general, with success rates of 50-80%. No strong evidence is available for the use of PFR after LAR. This study aims to prove a beneficial effect of PFR on fecal incontinence, quality of life, and costs in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery compared to standard treatment., Methods: The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized clinical trial. All patients that underwent LAR are recruited from the participating hospitals and randomized for either standard treatment or a standardized PFR program. A total of 128 patients should be randomized. Optimal blinding is not possible. Stratification will be done in variable blocks (gender and additional radiotherapy). The primary endpoint is the Wexner incontinence score; secondary endpoints are health-related and fecal-incontinence-related QoL and cost-effectiveness. Baseline measurements take place before randomization. The primary endpoint is measured 3 months after the start of the intervention, with a 1-year follow-up for sustainability research purposes., Discussion: The results of this study may substantially improve postoperative care for patients with fecal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction after LAR. This section provides insight in the decisions that were made in the organization of this trial., Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5469, registered on 03-09-2015. Protocol FORCE trial V18, 19-09-2019. Sponsor Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.