Search

A paradigm shift has occurred in cancer chemotherapy from tumor-specific treatment with cytotoxic agents to personalized medicine with molecular-targeted drugs. Thus, it is essential to identify genomic alterations and molecular features to recommend effective targeted molecular medicines regardless of the tumor site. Nevertheless, it takes considerable expertise to identify treatment targets from primary-sequencing data in order to provide drug recommendations. The Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) denotes a platform that integrates clinical and molecular features for clinical decisions.This study retrospectively analyses all the cases of discussion and decision at the MTB in Tohoku University Hospital and summarizes genetic alterations and treatment recommendations.The MTB discussed 1003 comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests conducted in patients with solid cancer, and the resulting rate of assessing treatment recommendations was approximately 19%. Among hundreds of genes in the CGP test, only 30 genetic alterations or biomarkers were used to make treatment recommendations. The leading biomarkers that led to treatment recommendations were tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) (n = 32), ERBB2 amplification (n = 24), BRAF V600E (n = 16), and BRCA1/2 alterations (n = 32). Thyroid cancer accounted for most cancer cases for which treatment recommendation was provided (81.3%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (42.4%) and urologic cancer (31.3%). The number of tests performed for gastrointestinal cancers was high (n = 359); however, the treatment recommendations for the same were below average (13%).The results of this study may be used to simplify treatment recommendations from the CGP reports and help select patients for testing, thereby increasing the accuracy of personalized medicine.

Comprehensive genomic profiling is increasingly used to facilitate precision oncology based on molecular stratification. In addition to conventional tissue comprehensive genomic profiling, comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA has become widely utilized in cancer care owing on its advantages, including less invasiveness, rapid turnaround time, and capturing heterogeneity. However, circulating tumor DNA comprehensive genomic profiling has some limitations, mainly false negatives due to low levels of plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and false positives caused by clonal hematopoiesis. Nevertheless, no guidelines and recommendations fully address these issues. Here, an expert panel committee involving representatives from 12 Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan was organized to develop expert consensus recommendations for the use of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid-based comprehensive genomic profiling. The aim was to generate guidelines for clinicians and allied healthcare professionals on the optimal use of the circulating tumor DNA assays in advanced solid tumors and to aid the design of future clinical trials that utilize and develop circulating tumor DNA assays to refine precision oncology. Fourteen clinical questions regarding circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid comprehensive genomic profiling including the timing of testing and considerations for interpreting results were established by searching and curating associated literatures, and corresponding recommendations were prepared based on the literature for each clinical question. Final consensus recommendations were developed by voting to determine the level of each recommendation by the Committee members.

In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for refractory cancer patients have been approved since June 2019, under the requirement that all cases undergoing CGP tests are annotated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) at each government-designated hospital. To investigate improvement in precision oncology, we evaluated and compared the proportion of cases receiving matched treatments according to CGP results and those recommended to receive genetic counseling at all core hospitals between the first period (11 hospitals, June 2019 to January 2020) and second period (12 hospitals, February 2020 to January 2021). A total of 754 and 2294 cases underwent CGP tests at core hospitals in the first and second periods, respectively; 28 (3.7%) and 176 (7.7%) patients received matched treatments (p 0.001). Additionally, 25 (3.3%) and 237 (10.3%) cases were recommended to receive genetic counseling in the first and second periods, respectively (p 0.001). The proportion was associated with the type of CGP test: tumor-only (N = 2391) vs. tumor-normal paired (N = 657) analysis (10.0% vs. 3.5%). These results suggest that recommendations regarding available clinical trials in networked MTBs might contribute to increasing the numbers of matched treatments, and that tumor-normal paired rather than tumor-only tests can increase the efficiency of patient referrals for genetic counseling.

Background Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor-agnostic agent has made since TRK inhibitors were approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the ‘Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)/Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO)-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO)’. Methods Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. Results The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 14 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Conclusion The committee proposed 14 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from TRK inhibitors.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is being increasingly used for the routine clinical management of solid cancers. In July 2018, the use of tumor tissue‐based CGP assays became available for all solid cancers under the universal health insurance system in Japan. Several restrictions presently exist, such as patient eligibility and limitations on the opportunities to perform such assays. The clinical implementation of CGP based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also expected to raise issues regarding the selection and use of tissue DNA and ctDNA CGP. A Joint Task Force for the Promotion of Cancer Genome Medicine comprised of three Japanese cancer‐related societies has formulated a policy proposal for the appropriate use of plasma CGP (in Japanese), available at https://www.jca.gr.jp/researcher/topics/2021/files/20210120.pdf, http://www.jsco.or.jp/jpn/user_data/upload/File/20210120.pdf, and https://www.jsmo.or.jp/file/dl/newsj/2765.pdf. Based on these recommendations, the working group has summarized the respective advantages and cautions regarding the use of tissue DNA CGP and ctDNA CGP with reference to the advice of a multidisciplinary expert panel, the preferred use of plasma specimens over tissue, and multiple ctDNA testing. These recommendations have been prepared to maximize the benefits of performing CGP assays and might be applicable in other countries and regions.

Purpose:This study aimed to identify factors associated with specialized palliative care (SPC) use and aggressive care at the end of life (EOL) among Japanese patients with advanced cancer. Methods:This single-center, follow-up cohort study involved patients with advanced cancer who received chemotherapy at Tohoku University Hospital. Patients were surveyed at enrollment, and we followed clinical events for 5 years from enrollment in the study. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent factors related to SPC use and chemotherapy in the last month before death.Results:We analyzed a total of 135 patients enrolled between January 2015 and January 2016. No patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and few received resuscitation or ventilation. We identified no factors significantly associated with SPC use. Meanwhile, younger age (20–59 years, odds ratio [OR] 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–12.91; p=0.02) and no receipt of SPC (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.07–17.37; p=0.04) were associated with chemotherapy in the last month before death.Conclusion:Younger age and a lack of SPC were associated with chemotherapy at the EOL in patients with advanced cancer in Japan. These findings suggest that Japanese patients with advanced cancer may benefit from access to SPC.

The KEYNOTE-659 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) (cohort 1) or S-1 and cisplatin (SP) (cohort 2) for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in Japan. Herein, we update the results of cohort 1 and describe the results of cohort 2. This open-label phase IIb study enrolled patients with advanced programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end-points were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One hundred patients were enrolled. In cohorts 1 and 2, median follow-up time was 16.9 and 17.1 months; ORR (central review), 72.2% and 80.4%; DOR, 10.6 and 9.5 months; DCR (central review), 96.3% and 97.8%; median PFS (central review), 9.4 and 8.3 months; and median OS, 16.9 and 17.1 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients, including peripheral sensory neuropathy (94.4%, cohort 1), decreased neutrophil count (82.6%, cohort 2), nausea (59.3% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2), and decreased appetite (61.1% and 60.9% in cohorts 1 and 2). Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 59.3% (cohort 1) and 78.3% (cohort 2), including decreased platelet count (14.8%, cohort 1) and decreased neutrophil count (52.2%, cohort 2). Pembrolizumab in combination with SOX or SP showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with PD-L1-positive, HER2-negative G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Purpose The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study included elderly patients aged 65 years or more who had fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal cancer and received trifluridine/tipiracil (70 mg/m2, days 1–5 and 8–12, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicities, association between efficacy and geriatric assessment scores, and association between toxicity and plasma drug concentrations. Results A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 73 years were enrolled. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.9–4.3 months), while median OS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7–8.9 months). Patients had an ORR of 0%, with 57% having stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 13% of the patients. Patients with a higher G8 score (15 or more) showed longer PFS than those with a lower G8 score (median 4.6 vs. 2.0 months; p = 0.047). Moreover, patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia showed higher maximum trifluridine concentrations than those with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (mean 2945 vs. 2107 ng/mL; p = 0.036). Discussion The current phase II trial demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil was an effective and well-tolerated option for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Moreover, geriatric assessment tools and/or plasma drug concentration monitoring might be helpful in predicting the efficacy and toxicities in elderly patients receiving this drug. Trial registration number UMIN000017589, 15/May/2015 (The University Hospital Medical Information Network)

Background Since June 2019, cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been reimbursed by the National Health Insurance system in Japan, with restrictions for government-designated hospitals with a molecular tumor board composed of multidisciplinary specialists, known as an expert panel (EP). The standardization of EPs is a critical challenge for implementing precision oncology in the clinical setting. Methods Data on consecutive cases who underwent the CGP tests at 11 core hospitals between June 2019 and January 2020 were collected. We evaluated the proportions of cases that received genomically matched treatments, including investigational new drugs (INDs) based on CGP results, and/or for which genetic counseling was recommended. Two simulated cases were annotated by each EP. The annotated reports were then centrally assessed. Results Each EP mainly discussed the applicability to genomically matched treatments and the necessity of performing genetic counseling. A pre-review of the report by key members in each EP reportedly made the EP conference more interactive and efficient, and thereby saved time. A total of 747 cases underwent CGP tests, 28 cases (3.7%) received genomically matched treatment, and 17 cases (2.3%) were referred for genetic counseling. Annotated reports for the simulated cases varied across the EPs, particularly the number of recommended IND trials, which seemed to be associated with the actual number of participants in IND trials. Conclusions This investigation provides reference data for the application of precision oncology in a clinical setting. Further investigations on the standardization of clinical annotations are warranted.

Background To promote precision oncology in clinical practice, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology, and the Japanese Cancer Association, jointly published “Clinical practice guidance for next-generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment” in 2017. Since new information on cancer genomic medicine has emerged since the 1st edition of the guidance was released, including reimbursement for NGS-based multiplex gene panel tests in 2019, the guidance revision was made. Methods A working group was organized with 33 researchers from cancer genomic medicine designated core hospitals and other academic institutions. For an impartial evaluation of the draft version, eight committee members from each society conducted an external evaluation. Public comments were also made on the draft. The finalized Japanese version was published on the websites of the three societies in March 2020. Results The revised edition consists of two parts: an explanation of the cancer genomic profiling test (General Discussion) and clinical questions (CQs) that are of concern in clinical practice. Particularly, patient selection should be based on the expectation that the patient's post-test general condition and organ function will be able to tolerate drug therapy, and the optimal timing of test should be considered in consideration of subsequent treatment plans, not limited to treatment lines. Conclusion We expect that the revised version will be used by healthcare professionals and will also need to be continually reviewed in line with future developments in cancer genome medicine.

Background Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare malignancy, and there is insufficient evidence about systemic chemotherapy for this disease. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a chemotherapeutic regimen with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6, mFOLFOX6) for patients with unresectable pseudomyxoma peritonei. Patients who received the therapy between April 2000 and February 2019 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, were enrolled in this study. Results Eight patients were treated with mFOLFOX6. The sites of primary tumor were appendix in six patients, ovary in a patient, and urachus in a patient. Six patients received surgery. Seven patients had histologically high-grade PMP, and one patient had low-grade PMP. The median follow-up duration was 27.2 months. All the patients had non-measurable regions as the targets of tumor response. Non-complete response or non-progressive disease was observed in seven patients, with a disease control rate of 87.5%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.0 months and 27.9 months, respectively. An obvious reduction in the symptoms was observed in two patients. Five patients experienced decline in the serum tumor markers, CEA or CA19-9. The grade 3/4 toxicity that was observed was grade 4 neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 neutropenia in two patients. Conclusions mFOLFOX6 might be an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with unresectable PMP. To our knowledge, this is the first case series of mFOLFOX6 in patients with unresectable PMP and the first case series of systemic chemotherapy for Asian patients with unresectable PMP.

Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Keigo Komine, Reio Ueta, Ryunosuke Numakura, Shonosuke Wakayama, Sho Umegaki, Sakura Hiraide, Yoshufumi Kawamura, Yuki Kasahara, Kota Ohuchi, Masahiro Takahashi, Shin Takahashi, Hidekazu Shirota, Masanobu Takahashi, Chikashi Ishioka Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, 980-8575, JapanCorrespondence: Chikashi Ishioka, Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, 4-1, Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan, Tel +81 227178543, Fax +81 227178548, Email chikashi@tohoku.ac.jpPurpose: One of the first-line treatment for gastric cancer patients is oxaliplatin, and the efficacy of this chemotherapeutic can be attenuated by the microbiome. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated whether treatment with antibiotics improved the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Patients and Methods: Fifty-four patients were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group and 35 to the antibiotic-untreated group.Results: The response rate of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the antibiotic-treated and antibiotic-untreated groups was 66.7% and 41.4%, respectively (p = 0.038). The median progression-free survival after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the antibiotic-treated and antibiotic-untreated groups was 8.8 and 5.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.456, 95% confidence interval = 0.254– 0.819; p = 0.007, Log rank test). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that antibiotic treatment was the only clinical parameter that correlated with the response to oxaliplatin.Conclusion: Antibiotic treatment could be used therapeutically to enhance the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Keywords: gastric cancer, chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, antibiotics

ImportanceQuality assurance of molecular tumor boards (MTBs) is crucial in cancer genome medicine.ObjectiveTo evaluate the concordance of recommendations by MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations at all 12 leading institutions for cancer genomic medicine in Japan using 50 simulated cases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a prospective quality improvement study of 50 simulated cancer cases. Molecular tumor boards from 12 core hospitals independently recommended treatment for 50 cases blinded to the centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. The study’s central committee consisted of representatives from all 12 core hospitals in Japan who selected the 50 simulated cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, including frequently observed genomic alterations. The central committee recommended centrally developed consensus treatment. The concordance rate for genomically matched treatments between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was evaluated. Data analysis was conducted from January 22 to March 3, 2021.ExposuresSimulated cases of cancer.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was concordance, defined as the proportion of recommendations by MTBs concordant with centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. A mixed-effects logistic regression model, adjusted for institutes as a random intercept, was applied. High evidence levels were defined as established biomarkers for which the treatment was ready for routine use in clinical practice, and low evidence levels were defined as biomarkers for genomically matched treatment that were under investigation.ResultsThe Clinical Practice Guidance for Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (edition 2.1) was used for evidence-level definition. The mean concordance between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was 62% (95% CI, 57%-65%). Each MTB concordance varied from 48% to 86%. The concordance rate was higher in the subset of patients with colorectal cancer (100%; 95% CI, 94.0%-100%), ROS1 fusion (100%; 95% CI, 85.5%-100%), and high evidence level A/R (A: 88%; 95% CI, 81.8%-93.0%; R:100%; 95% CI, 92.6%-100%). Conversely, the concordance rate was lower in cases of cervical cancer (11%; 95% CI, 3.1%-26.1%), TP53 mutation (16%; 95% CI, 12.5%-19.9%), and low evidence level C/D/E (C: 30%; 95% CI, 24.7%-35.9%; D: 25%; 95% CI, 5.5%-57.2%; and E: 18%; 95% CI, 13.8%-23.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that evidence level (high [A/R] vs low [C/D/E]: odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8-10.8) and TP53 alteration (yes vs no: odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.10) were significantly associated with concordance.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this study suggest that genomically matched treatment recommendations differ among MTBs, particularly in genomic alterations with low evidence levels wherein treatment is being investigated. Sharing information on matched therapy for low evidence levels may be needed to improve the quality of MTBs.

Platinum derivatives are important treatment options for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC), and a predictive marker for platinum-based therapy is needed for precision medicine.This study contained two cohorts consisting of EC patients treated using platinum-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT) as the first-line and another external cohort of nationwide clinicogenomic data from the BioBank Japan (BBJ).Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of therapeutic outcomes, refractory disease or not, following platinum-based CRT as first-line in 94 patients in the first cohort suggested the association of 89 SNPs usingrs3815544 is a novel candidate predictive marker for platinum-based EC therapy.

Patients with BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis despite recent therapeutic advances such as combination therapy with BRAF, MEK, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. To identify microRNAs (miRNAs) that can improve the efficacy of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (DAB) and MEK inhibitor trametinib (TRA), we screened 240 miRNAs in BRAF‐mutated CRC cells and identified five candidate miRNAs. Overexpression of miR‐193a‐3p, one of the five screened miRNAs, in CRC cells inhibited cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis. Reverse‐phase protein array analysis revealed that proteins with altered phosphorylation induced by miR‐193a‐3p were involved in several oncogenic pathways including MAPK‐related pathways. Furthermore, overexpression of miR‐193a‐3p in BRAF‐mutated cells enhanced the efficacy of DAB and TRA through inhibiting reactivation of MAPK signaling and inducing inhibition of Mcl1. Inhibition of Mcl1 by siRNA or by Mcl1 inhibitor increased the antiproliferative effect of combination therapy with DAB, TRA, and anti‐EGFR antibody cetuximab. Collectively, our study demonstrated the possibility that miR‐193a‐3p acts as a tumor suppressor through regulating multiple proteins involved in oncogenesis and affects cellular sensitivity to MAPK‐related pathway inhibitors such as BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, and/or anti‐EGFR antibodies. Addition of miR‐193a‐3p and/or modulation of proteins involved in the miR‐193a‐3p–mediated pathway, such as Mcl1, to EGFR/BRAF/MEK inhibition may be a potential therapeutic strategy against BRAF‐mutated CRC., We screened 240 miRNAs in BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer cells and found that miR‐193a‐3p was involved in several oncogenic pathways including MAPK‐related pathways. In addition, we found that overexpression of miR‐193a‐3p in BRAF‐mutated cells enhanced the efficacy of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor through inhibiting reactivation of MAPK signaling and inducing inhibition of Mcl1. Addition of miR‐193a‐3p and/or modulation of proteins involved in the miR‐193a‐3p–mediated pathway, such as Mcl1, to EGFR/BRAF/MEK inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy against BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a fatal gynecologic cancer, and its poor prognosis is mainly due to delayed diagnosis. Therefore, biomarker identification and prognosis prediction are crucial in EOC. Altered cell metabolism is a characteristic feature of cancers, and metabolomics reflects an individual’s current phenotype. In particular, plasma metabolome analyses can be useful for biomarker identification. In this study, we analyzed 624 metabolites, including uremic toxins (UTx) in plasma derived from 80 patients with EOC using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Compared with the healthy control, we detected 77 significantly increased metabolites and 114 significantly decreased metabolites in EOC patients. Especially, decreased concentrations of lysophosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylcholines and increased concentrations of triglycerides were observed, indicating a metabolic profile characteristic of EOC patients. After calculating the parameters of each metabolic index, we found that higher ratios of kynurenine to tryptophan correlates with worse prognosis in EOC patients. Kynurenine, one of the UTx, can affect the prognosis of EOC. Our results demonstrated that plasma metabolome analysis is useful not only for the diagnosis of EOC, but also for predicting prognosis with the variation of UTx and evaluating response to chemotherapy.

Bone and soft-tissue sarcomas are rare and are highly heterogeneous mesenchymal malignancies. It is therefore challenging to acquire the clinical data of patients with specific histological subtypes of sarcoma using large clinical trials, and there is a need to further establish the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas. The results of the current study revealed that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) highly accelerated region 1B (HAR1B) may serve as a predictive biomarker for pazopanib treatment in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Using multiplex reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and microarray analyses, the results demonstrated that HAR1B and HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR) were differentially expressed in pazopanib-sensitive cells and responders. It was further revealed that small interfering RNA-knockdown of HAR1B led to an increased resistance to pazopanib in sarcoma cell lines. Gene expression profiles associated with pazopanib sensitivity included cellular molecular pathways, such as genes involved in von-Willebrand factor-related signaling. The current study demonstrated that lncRNA HAR1B expression in sarcoma cell lines affected cellular sensitivity to pazopanib in patients with sarcoma.

11032 Background: Treatment recommendations (TRs) by molecular tumor boards (MTBs) based on comprehensive genomic profiling tests are crucial for enrolling cancer patients in genotype-matched trials. Our previous study of Japanese designated ‘Core’ hospitals using simulated cases showed that TRs for biomarkers with high evidence levels (ELs) were highly concordant between central consensus and MTBs, whereas those with low ELs showed low concordance, indicating that a learning program (LP) about obtaining information on matched trials, particularly for those with low ELs, is needed to improve the quality of TRs by MTBs (Kage H. ESMO 2021). Therefore, we conducted a nationwide prospective study to investigate the clinical utility of an LP for MTBs in designated ‘Hub’ hospitals and explore the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based annotation system. Methods: Fifty simulated cases were randomly divided into 2 groups (pre- and post-tests) by the central statistician, stratified by high vs. low ELs. Each MTB at ‘Hub’ hospitals (group), treating physicians at ‘Core’ hospitals (individual), and an AI company were eligible. Each participant made TRs for the first 25 cases, then participated in the LP, and made TRs for the second 25 cases. The online LP shared the methodology of making the optimal TRs and showed central consensus TRs for simulated cases. The primary endpoint was the proportion of MTBs that met prespecified ‘accreditation’ criteria for the second 25 cases: > 90% concordance for high ELs and > 40% for low ELs. Expected and threshold proportions of ‘accreditation’ MTBs were 50% and 20%, respectively, and the planned sample size was 24 MTBs. The improvements in concordance rates in TRs on post-tests were key secondary endpoints. The concordance rate of TRs with the AI system was an exploratory endpoint. Results: From May to December 2021, 47 participants applied, and 42 (27 MTBs, 14 individuals, and an AI company) were eligible. The primary ‘accreditation’ rate of MTBs was 55.6% (95% CI, 35.3-74.5%, p < 0.001), and the ‘accreditation’ rate of individuals was 35.7% (95% CI, 12.8-64.9%, p = 0.17). TR concordance rates improved significantly, from 57.5% (95% CI, 51.7-63.1%) to 65.7% (95% CI, 59.2-71.6%) [odds ratio (OR): 1.23, p = 0.04]. A prespecified subgroup analysis showed an improved concordance rate for biomarkers with low ELs for MTBs (OR, 1.32: 95% CI, 1.00-1.73), but not for individuals (OR, 1.11: 95% CI, 0.75-1.63). TR concordance rates with the AI system were 80% (95% CI, 60.0-91.4%) and 84% (95% CI, 64.3-93.9%) for pre- and post-tests, respectively. Conclusions: This LP significantly improved the quality of TRs by MTBs, potentially leading to providing more matched trials to cancer patients. TRs by the AI system showed higher concordance with central consensus TRs than MTBs, suggesting the clinical utility of AI-based TRs over those by MTBs.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare malignancy, and there is insufficient evidence about systemic chemotherapy for this disease.We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a chemotherapeutic regimen with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6, mFOLFOX6) for patients with unresectable pseudomyxoma peritonei. Patients who received the therapy between April 2000 and February 2019 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, were enrolled in this study.Eight patients were treated with mFOLFOX6. The sites of primary tumor were appendix in six patients, ovary in a patient, and urachus in a patient. Six patients received surgery. Seven patients had histologically high-grade PMP, and one patient had low-grade PMP. The median follow-up duration was 27.2 months. All the patients had non-measurable regions as the targets of tumor response. Non-complete response or non-progressive disease was observed in seven patients, with a disease control rate of 87.5%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.0 months and 27.9 months, respectively. An obvious reduction in the symptoms was observed in two patients. Five patients experienced decline in the serum tumor markers, CEA or CA19-9. The grade 3/4 toxicity that was observed was grade 4 neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 neutropenia in two patients.mFOLFOX6 might be an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with unresectable PMP. To our knowledge, this is the first case series of mFOLFOX6 in patients with unresectable PMP and the first case series of systemic chemotherapy for Asian patients with unresectable PMP.

Oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) are used as key drugs for the first‐line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no biomarkers have been identified to decide which of the drugs is initially used. In this translational research (TR) of the TRICOLORE trial, the advanced colorectal cancer subtype (aCRCS) was analyzed as a potential biomarker for the selection of OX or IRI. We collected 335 (68.8%) formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) primary tumor specimens from 487 patients registered in the TRICOLORE trial and performed direct sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of CRC‐related genes, comprehensive gene‐expression analysis, and genome‐wide methylation analysis. The progression‐free survival (PFS) of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in BRAF wild‐type (WT), PTEN‐positive, and aCRCS A1 patients. Among the molecular factors, aCRCS were only associated with the PFS of OX and IRI groups. The PFS of the IRI group was significantly better compared with the OX group in aCRCS A1 + B1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41‐0.82; P = .0023). In contrast, the OX group had better PFS compared with the IRI group in aCRCS B2, although this was not statistically significant (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.94‐2.96; P = .083). Nearly half of patients with mCRC (46.8%, aCRCS A1 + B1) respond well to IRI, while only about 18.5% (aCRCS B2) of patients with mCRC responded well to OX. In conclusion, the aCRCS might be a predictive factor for the clinical outcomes of OX‐based and IRI‐based therapies., From translational research of TRICOLORE trail, the advanced colorectal cancer subtypes (aCRCS) can help to select oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based therapy for first‐line metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

Two genomic profiling assays have been approved by Japanese national health insurance in December 2018. Japanese government assigned core hospitals, which can conduct molecular tumor board, called"expert panel"to make a therapeutic recommendation based on the genomic findings and concentrated the function of cancer genomic medicine. The genomic profiling tests under Japanese national health insurance system must be covered for the entire population. To eliminate regional disparities of such an advanced medicine, the infrastructure to spread cancer genomic medicine for collaborating among hospitals should be established. Here, we introduce our efforts to make regional collaboration in Tohoku University Hospital.

Background. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan are generally used to treat advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Antibiotics improve the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin but not irinotecan in a colon cancer cell line in vitro. This study retrospectively assessed whether antibiotics improve the treatment efficacy of oxaliplatin- but not irinotecan-based therapy in advanced CRC patients. Patients and Methods. The medical records of 220 advanced CRC patients who underwent oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based therapy were retrospectively reviewed. The oxaliplatin and irinotecan groups were further divided into antibiotic-treated (group 1) and antibiotic-untreated (group 2) subgroups. Results. In oxaliplatin groups 1 and 2, the response rate (RR) was 58.2% and 30.2%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 92.5% and 64.2%, respectively; the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.5–12.2) and 7.0 months (95% CI = 17.0–26.0), respectively, and the median overall survival (OS) was 23.8 months (95% CI = 5.1–9.1) and 17.4 months (95% CI = 13.1–24.9), respectively. In irinotecan groups 1 and 2, the RR was 17.8% and 20.0%, while the DCR was 75.6% and 69.1%, respectively; the median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI = 6.2–12.7) and 7.9 months (95% CI = 12.0–23.0), respectively, and the median OS was 16.8 months (95% CI = 5.9–10.6) and 13.1 months (95% CI = 10.4–23.7), respectively. Conclusion. To improve the treatment efficacy of oxaliplatin-based therapy in advanced CRC patients, adding antibiotics is a potential therapeutic option.

Background Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) has been established and introduced in the clinic as a standard treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, the efficacy and safety of rTM for DIC associated with solid tumors (DIC-STs) have not been fully established. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of rTM for DIC-STs and considered a treatment strategy with rTM for DIC-STs. Methods Patients with DIC-STs between November 2009 and March 2016 in 2 cancer core hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Data, including patient background, treatment course, and clinical outcomes of rTM for DIC-STs, were extracted. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparing the DIC score, resolution rate, and overall survival (OS) duration. Results The study included 123 patients with DIC-STs. The median OS in all patients was 41 days. The DIC resolution rate was 35.2%. DIC scores and DIC-related blood test data (fibrin degradation product and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio) significantly improved at the end of rTM administration (P

The combinations of oral fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin such as capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) or S-1 and cisplatin (SP) are regarded as a standard therapy against unresectable, recurrent, or advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Especially, SP is the most common regimen against AGC in Japan. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive AGC, trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER2 antibody, is additionally used in combination. Although trastuzumab in combination with XP (trastuzumab-XP) have been widely accepted, the efficacy of trastuzumab in combination with SP (trastuzumab-SP) lacks sufficient verification. The aim of the present study is to validate the comparability of trastuzumab-SP to trastuzumab-XP. Patients with HER2-positive AGC were assigned to the trastuzumab-XP or trastuzumab-SP group. We then retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety between both groups. As a first-line chemotherapy, trastuzumab in combination with XP or SP was administered to 58 patients: 28 with trastuzumab-XP and 30 with trastuzumab-SP. In the trastuzumab-XP group, response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were 39.3%, 89.3%, 7.9 months, and 20.0 months, respectively. In the trastuzumab-SP group, RR, DCR, mPFS and mOS were 50.0%, 86.7%, 6.9 months, and 16.7 months, respectively. No significant difference in efficacy was observed between both groups. Severe hand-foot syndrome was observed more frequently in the trastuzumab-XP group than in the trastuzumab-SP group (14.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.05). Trastuzumab in combination with SP is a potential first-line therapeutic option for patients with HER2-positive AGC.

Background: Patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis despite recent therapeutic advances such as combination therapy with BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibitors. Aim: Our aim was to clarify the functions of the microRNAs (miRNAs) involved in oncogenesis and sensitivity to BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutated CRC. Methods and Results: To identify miRNAs that sensitize a BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (DAB) and a MEK inhibitor trametinib (TRA), we screened 240 miRNAs in BRAF-mutated CRC cell line RKO. Among the screened miRNAs, we tried to elucidate the novel functional roles of miR-193a-3p in CRC cell lines. We found that miR-193a-3p overexpression inhibited cell proliferation in CRC cell lines. The protein array analysis revealed that protein phosphorylation levels were altered by miR-193a-3p overexpression in various pathways such as cell-cycle-related pathways and PI3K-AKT pathways. The enhanced cytotoxicity by miR-193a-3p in addition to DAB and TRA was validated in multiple BRAF-mutated cell lines. Furthermore, the enhanced cytotoxicity by miR-193a-3p in addition to DAB and TRA was shown to be through inhibiting reactivation of MAPK signaling. This enhanced cytotoxicity by miR-193a-3p was even observed under treatment of DAB, TRA, and an anti-EGFR antibody. Conclusions: Our study shows that miR-193a-3p regulates multiple proteins involved in oncogenesis, and proposes that the combination therapy of miR-193a-3p and BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be a promising treatment strategy in BRAF-mutated CRC. Citation Format: Sakura Hiraide, Masanobu Takahashi, Yuya Yoshida, Keigo Komine, Chikashi Ishioka. The functional roles of miRNA-193a-3p in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2361.

Background Bone is a metastatic site for various types of cancer. Cancer patients in whom bone metastases progress often have skeletal-related events (SREs). Denosumab and zoledronic acid are both bone-modifying agents that prevent the occurrence of SREs. Denosumab has been shown to be superior to zoledronic acid in delaying SREs in various types of cancer, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and multiple myeloma. However, it is still uncertain whether denosumab is superior to zoledronic acid in delaying the time to SREs in other types of cancers, including gastrointestinal cancer, pancreas-biliary system cancer, and other rare cancers. Patients and methods This retrospective study was conducted based on medical records from 2009 to 2015. Eligible patients who had been diagnosed with bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancer, pancreas-biliary system cancer, and rare cancers were included. Patients were assigned to a denosumab group, zoledronic acid group, or group without bone-modifying agent treatment (no-treatment group). Results The study included 168 patients. The times to SREs in the denosumab, zoledronic acid, and no-treatment groups were 186 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 96–323 days], 79 days (95% CI, 45–118 days), and 31 days (95% CI, 13–76 days), respectively. Although, a few patients had grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the denosumab and zoledronic acid groups, the bone-modifying agent treatment was not terminated. Conclusion From the perspective of the efficacy and safety of denosumab for delaying the time to SREs, denosumab should be used to prevent SREs in patients with bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancer, pancreas-biliary system cancer, and other rare cancers.

In Japan, "Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine" as leading hospitals on cancer genomic medicine and "Cooperative Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine" which conduct cancer genomic medicine in each region are working together to promote cancer genomic medicine. Eleven institutions as the former and 135 institutions as the latter are currently designated. It is essential to hold a molecular tumor board, which is called "Expert Panel" in Japan, to provide cancer genomic medicine for patients. In the Expert Panel, the results of tumor sequencing are interpreted with clinical information, then recommended treatment and genetic information to be provided are determined. Holding Expert Panels is a duty of Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine and Cooperative Hospitals need to participate in it. In order to facilitate the Expert Panel, it is effective to share patient's information using well-managed Web system. Besides that, there are many tasks to be addressed by cooperation of Designated Core Hospitals and Cooperative Hospitals such as registration of patient's information in the Center for Cancer genomics and Advanced Therapeutics(C-CAT), correspondence to increasing genomic testing and nurturing specialized human resources involved in cancer genomic medicine. Interinstitutional collaboration should be more encouraged to propagate cancer genomic medicine.

The antibodies targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have provided survival benefits in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. The anti-PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are considered superior to the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab as first-line therapy, suggesting that ipilimumab should be administered to patients with anti-PD-1 antibody-refractory melanoma in the second-line setting. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab after disease progression on anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Moreover, in patients with mucosal melanoma, a rare and aggressive subtype, evidence is extremely poor. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab among Japanese patients with nivolumab-refractory advanced mucosal melanoma. We retrospectively analyzed the seven patients with advanced mucosal melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab after disease progression on nivolumab at our hospital between September 2015 and December 2017. No patient achieved complete response or partial response to ipilimumab therapy. However, six patients achieved stable disease, and of these patients, three achieved a decline in the tumor size. All the three patients with a decline in tumor size developed grade 3 toxicity: two patients developed colitis and one patient experienced alanine aminotransferase elevation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for prior nivolumab therapy was 148 days. The median PFS for ipilimumab therapy after disease progression with nivolumab was 193 days. The median overall survival was 661 days. In conclusion, although even partial response was undetectable with ipilimumab therapy, ipilimumab could produce additional PFS among nivolumab-refractory advanced mucosal melanoma patients.

Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Keigo Komine, Yoshifumi Kawamura, Sakura Hiraide, Sho Umegaki, Yoshinari Okada, Kota Ohuchi, Yuko Sato, Masahiro Takahashi, Shin Takahashi, Hidekazu Shirota, Masanobu Takahashi, Chikashi Ishioka Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan Purpose: Research has revealed that some patients who develop resistance to the first taxane treatment exhibit a moderate response to the second taxane treatment (incomplete cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel). However, which patients are most likely to respond to the second treatment remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive factors for the efficacy of the second taxane treatment in patients resistant to the first.Patients and methods: We enrolled patients treated with paclitaxel and docetaxel (n=31) in this study. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we determined the predictive factors for the efficacy of the second taxane treatment. Then, we assigned patients to one of the three groups: 1) those with a partial response (PR) to the first taxane treatment who subsequently became refractory (PR group); 2) those whose response was stable disease (SD) and subsequently became refractory (SD group); and 3) those whose response was the progression of the disease with the first taxane treatment (progression disease [PD] group). Furthermore, the response rates were assessed for each group. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP 11.Results: Responses to the first taxane treatment considerably correlated with the efficacy of the second treatment in patients with a PR to the first taxane treatment (P=0.0061, univariate analysis; P=0.0056, multivariate analysis). In addition, response rates to the second taxane treatment in the PR, SD, and PD groups were 33.3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.Conclusion: The response to the first taxane treatment was a predictive factor for the efficacy of the second taxane treatment in patients with a PR to the first. Thus, the second treatment is highly recommended for patients who exhibit tumor shrinkage (a PR) by the first treatment. Keywords: taxane, predictive factor, univariate analysis, multivariate analysis

The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) with multiple promoter methylated loci has been observed in a subset of human colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. CIMP status, which is closely associated with specific clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, is considered a potential predictive biomarker for efficacy of cancer treatment. However, the relationship between the effect of standard chemotherapy, including cytotoxic drugs and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, and CIMP status has not been elucidated.In 125 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, we investigated how clinical outcome of chemotherapy was related to CIMP status as detected by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and to genetic status in five EGFR-related genes (KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, and AKT1) as detected by direct sequencing.CIMP-positive status was significantly associated with proximal tumor location and peritoneum metastasis (all P values0.05). The progression-free survival of patients with CIMP-positive tumors receiving sequential therapy with FOLFOX as the first-line treatment followed by irinotecan-based therapy as the second-line treatment (median = 6.6 months) was inferior to that of such patients receiving the reverse sequence (median = 15.2 months; P = 0.043). Furthermore, CIMP-positive tumors showed higher mutation frequencies for the five EGFR-related genes (74.1 %) than the CIMP-negative tumors did (50.0 %). Among the KRAS wild-type tumors, CIMP-positive tumors were associated with a worse clinical outcome than CIMP-negative tumors following anti-EGFR antibody therapy.Sequential FOLFOX followed by an irinotecan-based regimen is unfavorable in patients with CIMP-positive tumors. High frequencies of mutation in EGFR-related genes in CIMP-positive tumors may cause the lower response to anti-EGFR antibody therapy seen in patients with wild-type KRAS and CIMP-positive tumors.

A 60-year-old woman was admitted to a medical clinic because of epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a submucosal tumor in the upper gastric corpus and, the tumor was subsequently resected using partial gastrectomy. The pathological findings revealed that the tumor was a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. After 4 months of observation without any adjuvant treatment, the patient was found to have liver metastasis and she was admitted to our hospital for treatment. We successfully treated the patient through sequential drug therapies, including imatinib, nilotinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib, and maintaining disease control for more than 5 years.

Background: The inhibition of angiogenesis is a theoretically ideal chemotherapy for cancer, but there remains room for improvement. Most inhibitors of angiogenesis approved to date target vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs); however, VEGFs are only one of the many classes of participant in tumor angiogenesis. Because tumor angiogenesis is orchestrated by many components, including growth factors, signal transducers, and effectors, its regulation exhibits redundancy. Curcumin can associate with many proteins, and it reportedly inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Objective: We investigated the ability of a new curcumin analog, GO-Y078, to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Results: GO-Y078 inhibited human umbilical vascular endothelial cell sprouting. GO-Y078 also induced complete anoikis in vascular endothelial cells. Moreover, GO-Y078 suppressed the migration and invasion of vascular endothelial cells into extracellular matrix proteins. However, expression analysis revealed that GO-Y078 did not suppress molecules involved in VEGF signaling. Rather, GOY078 induced actin disorganization, dissociation of vinculin from actin, and destruction of focal adhesion, resulting in the inhibition of vascular endothelial cell mobility. GO-Y078 also suppressed in-vivo vasculogenesis in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Conclusion: Actin organization is a common effecter related to vascular endothelial cell mobility in angiogenesis. We demonstrated that GO-Y078 inhibits angiogenesis through actin disorganization.

von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, caused by germline mutations in the VHL gene, is a hereditary autosomal-dominant disorder which predisposes the individual to various malignant and benign tumors. VHL acts as a tumor suppressor, mainly through the negative regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors. Molecular-targeted drugs against vascular endothelial growth factor-signaling pathways, a target of hypoxia-inducible factors, have recently been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of patients with sporadic renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, whether such treatments are effective in patients with VHL disease remains to be elucidated. We herein report a Japanese patient with VHL disease who was successfully treated with sunitinib for approximately 5 years.

Background: Incomplete cross-resistances between paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel (DTX) has been demonstrated in several types of cancer. The objective of the present study was to assess the existence of cross-resistance between PTX and DTX in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Patients in the PTX group received PTX without DTX pretreatment, patients in the prior DTX (Pr-DTX) group received PTX after the development of resistance to DTX, and patients in the DTX group received DTX without subsequent PTX treatment. Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled. The response rates to PTX in the PTX and Pr-DTX groups were 22.7 and 20.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival times from the first day of PTX treatment in the PTX and Pr-DTX groups were 113 (95% CI 56-154) and 97 days (95% CI 36-189), respectively. The median overall survival times from the first day of DTX treatment in the Pr-DTX and DTX groups were 315 (95% CI 124-453) and 148 days (95% CI 139-177), respectively. Conclusions: There is no or incomplete clinical cross-resistance between PTX and DTX in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Replacement of DTX with PTX is a suitable treatment option for patients with DTX-resistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.