Search

Objective: The MACS facelift alone shows poor results on the medial neck in cases of pronounced, rigid platysmabands (McKinney III–IV°). The original MACS (“Minimal Access Cranial Suspension”) facelift delirs excellent results on the midface and leads to sustainably improved outcome on the neck by adding a fourth suture on the platysma. McKinney type I–II platysmabands can be treated only by lateral approach of the ‘fourth suture’, type III–IV should be treated with closed platysma myotomy before.Methods: Between October 2007 and November 2013 a number of 219 patients were treated with the MACS facelift technique accomplished by a fourth suture on the platysma and liposuction or optional lipectomy on the neck. On 47 patients closed transcutaneous platysma myotomy was performed.Results: Surgery time lasted on average 2.5 hours and was performed under sedation with local anesthesia in 85%. Recovery time ranged between 14 to 16 days until the patients were back to work. Due to their health status 54% of our patients had an inpatient arrangement for one night and 46% an outpatient arrangement.Conclusion: The modification of the MACS lift with the ‘fourth suture’ on the platysma keeps the benefits of the original technique but improves the aesthetic outcome on the neck.

Facial anatomy is highly individual in each patient. Anthropometric measurements can be a useful tool to objectively analyze individual facial anatomy to allow for better comparability before and after treatments to ultimately improve standardization of facial procedures, both nonsurgical and surgical. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview over clinically relevant and feasible facial anthropometric measurements and principles for aesthetic medicine. A literature review was conducted to describe the most important and clinically relevant anthropometric measurements and principles for both the entire face and for three aesthetically relevant facial regions: the periorbital region, the nose, and the perioral region. A multitude of different anthropometric measurements and principles have been described in the literature for both the overall facial appearance and specific facial regions. Certain generally accepted anthropometric principles and proportions need to be respected to achieve aesthetic and harmonious results. For the overall facial appearance, a focus on symmetry, certain proportions, facial angles, and indices has been described. Principles and measurements were also described for the periorbital region, the nose, and the perioral region. Although attractiveness and aesthetic perception are subjective, objective evaluation of facial surface anatomy via anthropometric measurements can improve pre- and postinterventional analysis of the face and help the treating physician to individualize treatments, both nonsurgical and surgical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Breast augmentation in trans-women requires special consideration and thorough preoperative planning. Objectives This study aimed to present our long-term outcome and experience gained over the past 21 years. Methods Trans-women who have undergone breast augmentation since 1995 were reviewed for primary surgery, type of incision, implant site, implant size and shape, and revisions. Results A total of 138 patients with a follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2.0-13.3) were included. In 112 patients (82.4%), the inframammary incision was chosen. Subpectoral implantation was performed in 70 patients (51.5%). Round breast implants (91 patients, 66.9%, P = 0.010) with low projection (103 patients, 75.7%, P < 0.001) were favored. The implant size used during 2011-2016 of 363.3 ± 97.3 cc was significantly increased as compared to the implant size reported during 1995-1999 (mean difference, +142.1 cc, P < 0.001) and 2000-2004 (mean difference, +113.5 cc, P < 0.001). Simultaneously, revision rates dropped significantly over time (52.9% during 1995-1999 as compared to 6.9% during 2011-2016, P < 0.001). Overall, request for larger implants was the most common indication for revision (13 patients, 9.4%) after 6 months (range, 4.0-18.7). At revision, implant volume was 355.4 ± 132.8 cc, showing significant increase of 107.0 ± 48.1 cc as compared to primary implants (+30.0%, P = 0.048). Conclusions Request for larger breast implants was the most common reason for revision. Depending on the various degrees of breast tissue growth due to hormonal therapy, whenever applicable, we recommend round, low projection implants with a mean size of 360 cc in the prepectoral pocket. Level of Evidence: 4 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Botulinum toxin (BTX) products continue to be widely used for facial rejuvenation. Variables to consider prior to BTX treatment include the anatomical area to be treated, gender, muscle mass, ethnicity, skin thickness, and the effects of aging. Objective: To describe a treatment algorithm which has been developed for facial rejuvenation to help physicians to easily and systematically customize BTX treatment, and to describe its use in a large number of patients. Methods and Materials: Prior to treatment, digital images of patients were obtained while relaxed and while forming different facial expressions. This information was used to plan the depth, dose, and location of BTX injections (onabotulinumtoxinA; Botox®; Allergan, Inc). Dilution was 100 U of BTX to 1 mL 0.9% preserved saline. Injections were performed with 30 U insulin syringes and 30 gauge needles. Results: The treatment algorithm described here has been used by the author for facial rejuvenation for more than 5 years. It was originally based on published guidelines; however, by carefully noting treatment outcomes, the number and location of injection points and the dose of BTX used have been modified to create the current treatment system. Conclusion: Published guidelines for the use of BTX are an excellent starting point for clinicians with little experience; however, each practitioner is likely to develop their own algorithm for achieving good facial rejuvenation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ear and earlobe deformities after surgical rhytidectomy are common and can significantly diminish the aesthetic outcome. The main causes of ear/earlobe distortion are skin overresection, an imbalance between vertical/horizontal skin-lift vectors, and tractional distortions through superficial muscularaponeurotic system (SMAS) tension.Objectives: To demonstrate a new method for earlobe suturing and ear fixation that would prevent aesthetics-related complications after facelift surgery.Methods: A total of 105 primary SMAS facelift surgeries were performed between 2015 and 2016 by the first author. A combination technique consisting of a posterior earlobe rotation flap (PERF) and a concha-mastoid suspension suture (CMSS) was executed bilaterally within each facelift procedure (n = 210). A retrospective data analysis was conducted (preoperatively and one year postoperatively) using our hospital information system and a photometric data analysis to assess auricular displacement, earlobe distortion, and hypertrophic scarring.Results: Pseudoptosis of the earlobe was noted in two cases, and auricular displacement was observed in four cases. Bilateral mild hypertrophic scarring was seen in one patient. The postoperative photometric analysis showed a natural ptosis grade I/II in all the patients, with a statistically significantly reduced postoperative earlobe size (P < 0.05). The total rate of aesthetics-related complications was 4% in our cohort (earlobe distortion with pseudoptosis: 1%; auricular displacement: 2%; hypertrophic scarring: 1%).Conclusions: Our modification of the facial flap anchoring at the ear base in combination with a CMSS stabilizes the natural position of the ear and prevents distortion while allowing better control over the earlobe's aesthetic shaping. This novel method reduces the incidence of ear/earlobe deformities and hypertrophic scarring at the ear base after rhytidectomy and, therefore, promises to be a valuable advancement.Level of Evidence4: [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The polyacrylamide hydrogel Aquamid® has been used as a permanent filler to enhance facial soft tissue volume and correct wrinkles since 2001. Various long-term studies have proved the safety of the product. Nonetheless, if complications such as migration occur, they can be difficult to treat.Methods: Eleven patients suffering from late-onset complications after taking Aquamid® injections in the lips underwent product removal and subsequent labial reconstruction between 2009 and 2017. The reconstruction was performed using a modified bikini reduction technique combined, in eight cases, with immediate autologous fat grafting.Results: In all the patients, general fibrosis and a diffused distribution of the product within all three layers of the lips resulted in the need for labial reconstruction. Migration, as far as in the mucosa and perioral skin, accounted for macroscopically visible yellowish accumulations. In ten out of eleven cases, an individually modified bikini reduction technique, with or without any combination of autologous fat grafting, led to an esthetically satisfying result. One patient developed a severe upper lip necrosis.Conclusion: Contradictory to several previous studies attesting to the lack of migration after Aquamid® application to the lips, capsule formation around the product is impaired, allowing for migration even years after the injection. Product aspiration is not possible in these cases, thus necessitating complex lip reconstruction. Bikini reduction and fat grafting are valuable tools for labial reconstruction. Product residuals within the mucosa have to be accepted. Special care has to be taken while treating smokers.Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Midfacial aging involves skeletal changes, muscle weakening, and fat redistribution, resulting in volume loss, skin sagging, and deepened nasolabial folds. High-Intensity Facial Electrical Stimulation (HIFES) combined with Radiofrequency (RF) is a novel non-invasive method to address these changes by enhancing muscle mass and remodeling subcutaneous tissue., Objectives: To assess the efficacy of HIFES and Synchronized RF in improving midfacial aesthetics, specifically muscle thickness, skin displacement, and facial volume., Methods: This prospective, non-randomized study included 37 participants who underwent four HIFES and RF treatments over 24 weeks. Assessments at baseline, 4, 16, and 24 weeks used ultrasound imaging, electromyography (EMG), 3D surface imaging, and the modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (FWS). A related porcine study evaluated the treatment's histological effects., Results: Zygomaticus Major Muscle (ZMM) thickness increased from 2.06 mm to 2.80 mm, with a 39.3% rise in EMG signal strength, indicating improved muscle function. Skin displacement analysis revealed horizontal (0.90 mm) and vertical (1.01 mm) shifts, particularly laterally. Midface volume increased by 1.43 cm³ at 24 weeks. The porcine study confirmed increased muscle fiber size, myonuclei count, and mass density, aligning with human results., Conclusions: HIFES and Synchronized RF treatments significantly improved muscle thickness, skin displacement, and facial volume, effectively rejuvenating the midface. These clinical findings, supported by histological evidence, suggest a promising non-invasive approach for facial rejuvenation. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results and assess long-term effects., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Auricular displacement (AD) and earlobe distortion, such as "pixie ear," are commonly seen deformities after rhytidectomies. In 2018, the authors of this article published a prophylactic technique (posterior earlobe rotation flap [PERF] and concha-mastoid suspension suture [CMSS]) to prevent such cosmetic-related complications in primary facelift surgery. Here, the authors review the utilization of this technique to correct such deformities in patients receiving revision facelift surgeries., Objectives: The authors sought to demonstrate the usefulness of this technique in reconstructive cases suffering from such aesthetic deformities., Methods: A total 25 secondary and 15 tertiary rhytidectomies were operated between 2015 and 2018. A combination PERF/CMSS technique was performed bilaterally during each revision facelift surgery (n = 80). A retrospective data analysis (preoperatively; 1 year postoperatively) was conducted to detect any deformities., Results: No "pixie ear" deformities were seen in any of our patients postoperatively. AD was detected twice and unilateral hypertrophic scarring once. The postoperative photometric analysis showed a natural ptosis grade I/II in all our patients. The total rate of aesthetic-related complications in our patient cohort was 3.75% (AD: 2.5%; hypertrophic scarring: 1.25%)., Conclusions: After demonstrating the effectiveness of the PERF and CMSS techniques in primary facelifts, the authors reviewed the technique's effectiveness for restoring earlobe distortion and AD in secondary or tertiary rhytidectomy cases. In addition to its prophylactic utilization, this method also possesses strong reconstructive power to change tension vectors applied on the face (CMSS) and/or to correct pre-existing aesthetic complications, such as "pixie ear" formation (PERF)., (© 2020 The Aesthetic Society. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Microfocused ultrasound (MFU) is a heat technology that is developed from focused ultrasound (FU) used in a high intense mode to generate heat (HIFU). Patient assessment is very complex and involves more than just addressing complaints. It is a challenge to evaluate, decide on options, and give treatments that guarantee the best outcomes. In order to facilitate the process, the authors divided the protocol into five steps: Assess (expectations, features); Decide (which depth to customize); Select (choose a number of lines to achieve the objective); Plan (combination, if needed); Treat (documentation, safety, and comfort). Methods: The PubMed search engine was used to search all publications from 1900–2019 that mention HIFU. The information collected was then grouped into the five protocol steps. Discussion: MFU is a focused ultrasound device that, at certain energy levels, produces heat over 55ºC at the focal point, which leads to thermal coagulation points (TCPs) in the target tissue. The creation of TCPs leads to a healing cascade, ending with neocollagenesis and neoelastogenesis. At different levels, this can bring about either a lifting effect or skin tightening, depending on the structure targeted. Therefore, the two most important tools for precision and efficacy of treatment are visualization with ultrasound and real-time evaluation of severity and structural changes (such as bone or fat loss). Conclusion: MFU-V is a well-known and, based on the evidence, an effective tool for non-invasive lifting and skin tightening. The secret to successful use of the device is to assess adequately patient needs and expectations and plan ahead for the combination of other treatment if necessary to achieve the desired outcome. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(11):1075-1082.