Search

Background Venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications appear common in hospitalised COVID-19 patients, particularly among critically ill patients in intensive care units. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the reported use of thromboprophylaxis. Aims The primary objective was to determine rates of symptomatic VTE in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Secondary objectives were to assess adherence to an institutional risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis guideline, and rates of bleeding complications. Methods A retrospective, single-centre, cohort study was performed in consecutive hospitalised COVID-19 patients over a six-month period (March - August 2020). Enoxaparin was used as thromboprophylaxis in all patients without a contraindication, with dose adjusted according to disease severity, weight and renal function. Results Among 86 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, no VTEs were identified. Eighty-one patients (94%) received anticoagulation, with 90% adherence to institutional thromboprophylaxis guidelines. Four bleeding events occurred, with one clinically relevant non-major bleeding event and three minor bleeding events. Conclusion Low rates of VTE were identified in hospitalised COVID-19 patients using a risk- adapted thromboprophylaxis protocol. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The role of cytarabine-based induction and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in front-line treatment of younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is well established, however the utility of intensive approaches in older patients remains unclear. This retrospective study compared first line treatment outcomes in patients aged 60 years or more, treated at six tertiary centres between 2000–2015. 70 patients included had a median age of 69 (60–91) and most (94%) demonstrated advanced stage disease. Treatment regimens included: R-CHOP-like (n = 39), alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAC (n = 10), R-HyperCVAD/R-MA (n = 7), R-CHOP/Cytarabine (Nordic Protocol) (n = 10) and other (n = 4). 16 patients underwent an ASCT. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 37 months. Compared to R-CHOP-like therapies, cytarabine-based regimens were associated with an improved overall response rate (ORR) of 70% vs 33% (p

BACKGROUND Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is an accepted investigation in fever of unknown origin (FUO) to uncover haematological malignancies, such as lymphoma, and sometimes infections. With the advance in imaging modalities, such as 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to identify the focus of lymphoma, BMB may not contribute to the diagnosis when there are no other clinical features to suggest an underlying haematological disease. AIM To investigate the utility of BMB in determining the cause of FUO, when there are no other indications for BMB. METHODS Medical records of adult patients who had BMB performed for FUO or febrile illness from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 in four metropolitan tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia were reviewed. Patients with other concurrent indications for BMB, known human immunodeficiency virus infection and previously diagnosed connective tissue diseases were excluded. RESULTS Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Fifty-one patients had a final diagnosis for fever (systemic inflammatory diseases, infective, malignancy or other) while 22 patients had no diagnoses. In only 10 patients (13.7%) did BMB contribute to the diagnosis, finding either malignancy or granulomata. However, all these diagnoses could have been made without BMB. Two patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had normal BMB. FDG-PET was helpful in making a diagnosis in eight (25%) out of 32 patients. CONCLUSION Performing BMB in patients with FUO and no other haematological abnormalities is of very limited value, and other investigations, such as FDG-PET, may be more likely to help establish a definitive diagnosis.

Introduction While the role of cytarabine-based immunochemotherapy (ICT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in untreated younger patients with MCL is well established, the utility of 'more intense' approaches in older patients is uncertain. Despite a median age at presentation of 60 years or more there are few therapeutic trials focussing on older patients. With the development of targeted agents, the need to define the optimal ICT strategy for comparison is pressing. Methods The primary aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of first line ICT based therapy in patients with MCL aged over 60 years. Treatment and outcome data were collected for patients treated between 2000-2015 across a combined health-care network servicing the south-eastern, south-western and central corridor of the Australian state of Victoria (catchment area >2 million patients encompassing four major academic tertiary referral centers). Eligible patients had MCL diagnosed according to WHO 2008 criteria, confirmed by either fluorescence in situ hybridization for t(11;14) translocation or immunohistochemistry for cyclin D1 expression. Only cases with adequate information, including baseline characteristics, treatment regimens and outcome, were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were modelled using Cox regression. For ICT comparison, patients undergoing ASCT were censored at the time of transplant. Differences in hospitalization and transfusion were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results 52 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 69 (range 60-91; M/F >3:1), of which 23 patients were >70 years. Most patients had advanced disease on staging, >1 extra-nodal site and an intermediate-high MIPI score. All received rituximab with initial therapy. Treatment regimens included: R-CHOP-like (31), alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAC (10), R-HyperCVAD/R-MA (7) and other (4). Eleven patients underwent ASCT. The median follow up for surviving patients was 40 months. Type of chemotherapy and up-front ASCT were the only variables influencing PFS and OS. Cytarabine-based ICT was associated with an improved median PFS (not reached vs 35 months, HR 0.27 [0.08-0.93], p=0.018) and OS (not reached vs 54 months, HR 0.28 [0.08-0.94], p=0.039) compared to R-CHOP-like regimens. Patients undergoing ASCT were younger (mostly < 70 years) and demonstrated improved median OS (not reached vs 46 months, HR 0.124 [0.017-0.921], p=0.041). No statistically significant difference in efficacy between R-HyperCVAD/R-MA and R-CHOP/R-DHAC could be determined due to low numbers. Both group of patients receiving cytarabine demonstrated durable response over time. However, those receiving R-HyperCVAD/R-MA experienced greater toxicity with increased hospitalisation: median 54 [31-72] v 20 [6-77] days, p=0.023 and transfusion requirements: median 13 [7-24] v 2 [0-5] red cell units, p=0.001; median 6 [2-15] v. 0 [0-1] platelet pools, p=0.001. Conclusion In older patients with previously untreated MCL, cytarabine-based ICT resulted in a significant improvement in OS, with a 72% reduction in the risk of death relative to CHOP-like therapy. Cytarabine-based ICT is highly efficacious and well tolerated and should serve as a benchmark with which to compare targeted therapies. ASCT should also be considered in selected older patients. Table Table. Disclosures Quach: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding.