Search

BACKGROUND: While cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) genotypes are associated with clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients, it is unknown if genotype impacts lung transplant outcomes. We sought to compare lung transplant survival and time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) between high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified CFTR genotypes. METHODS: We used merged data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2005-2017) and United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (2005-2016). Cox Proportional Hazards models compared graft failure after lung transplant and time to BOS among high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified risk CFTR genotype classes. RESULTS: Among 1830 cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients, median survival for those with low-risk, high-risk, and not yet classified genotype was 9.83, 6.25, and 5.75 years, respectively. Adjusted Cox models showed recipients with a low-risk genotype had 39% lower risk of death or re-transplant compared to those with high-risk genotype (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40, 0.91). A subset of 1585 lung transplant recipients were included in the BOS subgroup analysis. Adjusted analyses showed no significant difference of developing BOS among high-risk, low-risk, or not yet classified genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplant recipients with low-risk CFTR genotype have better survival after transplant compared to recipients with high-risk or not yet classified genotypes. Given these differences, future studies evaluating the mechanism by which CFTR genotype affects post-transplant survival could identify potential targets for intervention.

RATIONALE: Many lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have low preoperative body mass index (BMI); however, post-transplant BMI recovery is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate BMI recovery (⩾18.5 kg/m(2)) among CF lung transplant recipients with low preoperative BMI and to investigate the association of survival with BMI recovery. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing and CF Foundation patient registries (June 2005–December 2016) were used to identify CF lung transplant recipients. Among recipients surviving ⩾1 year, Cox modeling compared post-transplant 1-year conditional survival between recipients with low (

In 2017, Nkam et al. published a prognostic score to predict death or lung transplant within 3 years among adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Their model was developed using French CF registry data and was subsequently validated in the Canadian CF registry. We evaluated this prognostic score using data from adult patients with CF in the United States (US) CF Foundation Patient registry, combined with lung transplant records from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry (2013 to 2016) (n=11,542). We found that the prognostic score had a very good discriminative index predicting death or lung transplant in the US CF population (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.88-0.89) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.83 (95% CI 2.69 – 2.97) for each unit increase in the score. However, it did not provide significant additional utility over an FEV1 ≤30% of predicted as a predictor of death or lung transplant.

RATIONALE: Low body mass index (BMI) may influence lung transplant decisions for patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether patients with advanced CF lung disease and BMI ≤17 kg/m(2) are less likely to be listed for lung transplant or have a higher risk of death without listing compared to those with higher BMI. METHODS: Using merged United Network for Organ Sharing and CF Foundation Patient Registries, we identified adults with onset of advanced lung disease (FEV(1) ≤ 40% predicted) between May-2005 and December-2016. We analyzed survival using competing risks regression with cause-specific risks of listing for lung transplant and death without listing. BMI ≤ 17 kg/m(2) was our predictor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 5,121 CF patients with advanced lung disease, 23% were listed for lung transplant (n=1,201), 23% died without listing (n=1,190), and 44% were alive without listing (n=2,730) as of December-2016. Patients with BMI ≤ 17 kg/m(2) were less likely to be listed for transplant (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57, 0.83) and more likely to die without listing (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.41, 1.88). We identified important regional variations in the likelihood of referral and listing, based on BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced CF lung disease and BMI ≤ 17 kg/m(2) are less likely to be listed for lung transplant and have a higher risk of dying without listing, compared to those with higher BMI. Regional differences suggest access to transplant for malnourished CF patients may be limited by location.

Background Low muscle mass is common in patients approaching lung transplantation and may be linked to worse post-transplant outcomes. Existing studies assessing muscle mass and post-transplant outcomes include few patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods Between May 1993 and December 2018, 152 adults with CF received lung transplants at our institution. Of these, 83 met inclusion criteria and had usable computed tomography (CT) scans. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we evaluated the association between pre-transplant thoracic skeletal muscle index (SMI) and our primary outcome of death after lung transplantation. Secondary outcomes, including days to post-transplant extubation and post-transplant hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, were assessed using linear regression. We also examined associations between thoracic SMI and pre-transplant pulmonary function and 6-min walk distance. Results Median thoracic SMI was 26.95 cm2/m2 (IQR 23.97, 31.32) for men and 22.83 cm2/m2 (IQR 21.27, 26.92) for women. There was no association between pre-transplant thoracic SMI and death after transplant (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95, 1.11), days to post-transplant extubation, or post-transplant hospital or ICU length of stay. There was an association between pre-transplant thoracic SMI and pre-transplant FEV1% predicted (b = 0.39; 95% CI 0.14, 0.63), with higher SMI associated with higher FEV1% predicted. Conclusions Skeletal muscle index was low for men and women. We did not identify a significant relationship between pre-transplant thoracic SMI and post-transplant outcomes. There was an association between thoracic SMI and pre-transplant pulmonary function, confirming the potential value of sarcopenia as a marker of disease severity.

There is no consensus on the best model of care for individuals with CF to manage the non-pulmonary complications that persist after lung transplant. The CF Foundation virtually convened a group of international experts in CF and lung-transplant care. The committee reviewed literature and shared the post-lung transplant model of care practiced by their programs. The committee then developed a survey that was distributed internationally to both the clinical and individual with CF/family audiences to determine the strengths, weaknesses, and preferences for various models of transplant care. Discussion generated two models to accomplish optimal CF care after transplant. The first model incorporates the CF team into care and proposes delineation of responsibilities for the CF and transplant teams. This model is reliant on outstanding communication between the teams, while leveraging the expertise of the CF team for management of the non-pulmonary manifestations of CF. The transplant team manages all aspects of the transplant, including pulmonary concerns and management of immunosuppression. The second model consolidates care in one center and may be more practical for transplant programs that have expertise managing CF and have access to CF multidisciplinary care team members (e.g., located in the same institution). The best model for each program is influenced by several factors and model selection needs to be decided between the transplant and the CF center and may vary from center to center. In either model, CF lung transplant recipients require a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of their providers and mechanisms for effective communication. ispartof: J Cyst Fibros vol:22 issue:3 pages:374-380 ispartof: location:Netherlands status: published

OBJECTIVES: We propose a framework of health outcomes modeling with dynamic decision-making and real-world data (RWD) to evaluate the potential utility of novel risk prediction models in clinical practice. Lung transplant (LTx) referral decisions in cystic fibrosis offer a complex case study. METHODS: We used longitudinal RWD for a cohort of adults (n = 4,247) from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation patient registry to compare outcomes of an LTx referral policy based on machine learning (ML) mortality risk predictions to referral based on (1) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) alone, and (2) heterogenous usual care (UC). We then developed a patient-level simulation model to project number of patients referred for LTx and 5-year survival, accounting for transplant availability, organ allocation policy, and heterogenous treatment effects. RESULTS: Only 12% (95% CI: 11%, 13%) of patients were referred for LTx over 5 years under UC, compared to 19% (18%, 20%) under FEV(1) and 20% (19%, 22%) under ML. Of 309 patients who died before LTx referral under UC, 31% (27%, 36%) would have been referred under FEV(1) and 40% (35%, 45%) would have been referred under ML. Given a fixed supply of organs, differences in referral time did not lead to significant differences in transplants, pre- or post- transplant deaths, or overall survival in 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health outcomes modelling with RWD may help to identify novel ML risk prediction models with high potential real-world clinical utility, and rule out further investment in models that are unlikely to offer meaningful real-world benefits.

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

The availability of new diagnostic algorithms for cystic fibrosis (CF), changing population demographics and programs that impact family planning decisions can influence incidence rates. Thus, previously reported incidence rates in Canada and the United States (US) may be outdated. The objectives of this study were to estimate contemporary CF incidence rates in Canada and the US and to determine if the incidence rate has changed over time.This population-based cohort study utilized data between 1995-2019 from the Canadian CF Registry (CCFR), Statistics Canada, US CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data, and US Center for Disease Control (CDC) National Vital Statistics System. Incidence was estimated using the number of live CF births by year, sex, and geographic region using Poisson regression, with the number of live births used as the denominator. To account for delayed diagnoses, we imputed the proportion of diagnoses expected given historical trends, and varying rates of newborn screening (NBS) implementation by region.After accounting for implementation of NBS and delayed diagnoses, the estimated incidence rate for CF in 2019 was 1:3848 (95% CI: 1:3574, 1:4143) live births in Canada compared to 1:5130 (95% CI:1:4996, 1:5267) in the US. There was substantial regional variation in incidence rates within both Canada and the US. Since 1995, incidence rates have decreased at a rate of 1.6% per year in both countries (p0.001).Contemporary CF incidence rates suggest CF incidence is lower than previously reported and varies widely within North America. This information is important for resource planning and for tracking how programs (e.g., genetic counselling, modulator availability etc.) may impact the incidence of CF moving forward.

Background Understanding how health outcomes differ for patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease living in the United States compared with Canada has health policy implications. Research Question What are rates of lung transplant (LTx) and rates of death without LTx in the United States and Canada among individuals with FEV1 Study Design and Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study, 2005 to 2016, using the US CF Foundation, United Network for Organ Sharing, and Canadian CF registries. Individuals with CF and at least two FEV1 measurements Results There were 5,899 patients (53% male) and 905 patients (54% male) with CF with FEV1 Interpretation There are lower rates of LTx and an increased risk of death without LTx for US patients with CF with FEV1

The last decade has seen development of oral, small molecule therapies that address the basic cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein defect. Highly effective modulator treatment (HEMT) that is efficacious for a large majority of people living with cystic fibrosis (CF) promises to change the landscape of this chronic life-limiting disease. Some people living with CF have a CFTR genotype that renders them eligible for HEMT, but also have comorbidities that excluded them from the original Phase III clinical trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval. The purpose of this review is to address the use of HEMT in challenging situations, including initiation for those with advanced CF lung disease, and use after solid organ transplant, during pregnancy, and for individuals with CFTR-related disorders without a definitive diagnosis of CF.

Introduction To describe the characteristics and outcomes of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) hospitalized with cirrhosis in the United States. Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study of hospitalizations among children with CF using the 2016 Kid's Inpatient Database. Results In total, 9,615 admissions were analyzed. Diagnosis of cirrhosis was present in 509 (5.3%) and was significantly associated with increased mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges compared with those without cirrhosis. Hepatic encephalopathy was significantly associated with death in children with cirrhosis. Discussion Future interventions should be designed to support children with CF who have cirrhosis to improve clinical outcomes.

Previous literature in cystic fibrosis (CF) has shown a 10-year survival gap between Canada and the United States (US). We hypothesized that differential access to and survival after lung transplantation may contribute to the observed gap. The objectives of this study were to compare CF transplant outcomes between Canada and the US and estimate the potential contribution of transplantation to the survival gap.Data from the Canadian CF Registry and the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry supplemented with data from United Network for Organ Sharing were used. The probability of surviving after transplantation between 2005 and 2016 was calculated using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Survival by insurance status at the time of transplantation and transplant center volume in the US were compared with those in Canada using Cox proportional hazard models. Simulations were used to estimate the contribution of transplantation to the survival gap.Between 2005 and 2016, there were 2,653 patients in the US and 470 in Canada who underwent lung transplantation for CF. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 88.3%, 71.8%, and 60.3%, respectively, in the US compared with 90.5%, 79.9%, and 69.7%, respectively, in Canada. Patients in the US were also more likely to die on the waitlist (p0.01) than patients in Canada. If the proportion of who underwent transplantation and post-transplant survival in the US were to increase to those observed in Canada, we estimate that the survival gap would decrease from 10.8 years to 7.5 years.Differences in waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival can explain up to a third of the survival gap observed between the US and Canada.

Background Reduced BMI is an absolute contraindication for lung transplantation (LTx) at most centers in the United States. The objective of this study was to quantify post-LTx survival of moderate to severely underweight patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) (BMI Methods Using United Network for Organ Sharing Registry data (undergoing transplant from June 2005-November 2015), Kaplan-Meier estimates of median posttransplant survival were calculated for all patients with CF, COPD, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), as well as low and normal weight CF subgroups. Cox regression modeling stratified according to transplant center assessed risk of posttransplant mortality in recipients with CF and a BMI Results Median posttransplant survival (95% CI) for CF, COPD, and IPF was 7.9 (7.2-8.6), 5.9 (5.6-6.2), and 5.5 (5.2-5.8) years, respectively. Although an absolute decrease was noted in posttransplant survival for recipients with CF and a BMI Conclusions Transplant recipients with CF and a BMI

Improved predictive models are needed in lung transplantation in the setting of a proposed allocation system that incorporates longer-term post-transplant survival in the United States. Allocation systems require accurate mortality predictions to justly allocate organs.Utilizing the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2005-2017), we fit models to predict 1-year mortality based on the Lung Allocation Score (LAS), the Chan, et al, 2019 model, a novel "clinician" model (a priori clinician selection of pre-transplant covariates), and two machine learning models (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator; LASSO and Random Forests) for predicting 1-year and 3-year post-transplant mortality. We compared predictive accuracy among models. We evaluated the calibration of models by comparing average predicted probability vs observed outcome per decile. We repeated analyses fit for 3-year mortality, disease category, including donor covariates, and LAS era.The area under the cure for all models was low, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62. All exhibited reasonable negative predictive values (0.87-0.90), but the positive predictive value for was poor (all0.25). Evaluating LAS calibration found 1-year post-transplant estimates consistently overestimated risk of mortality, with greater differences in higher deciles. LASSO, Random Forests, and clinician models showed no improvement when evaluated by disease category or with the addition of donor covariates and performed worse for 3-year outcomes.The LAS overestimated patients' risk of post-transplant death, thus underestimating transplant benefit in the sickest candidates. Novel models based on pre-transplant recipient covariates failed to improve prediction. There should be wariness in post-transplant survival predictions from available models.

Improved methods are needed to risk-stratify patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and reduced FEVWhat are the predictors of death or lung transplantation (LTx) within 2 years among patients with CF whose FEVPatients with CF, age ≥ 6 years with FEVFEVAmong individuals with CF and FEV

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the most important long-term complication after lung transplant (LTx), and clinical experience suggests significant variability in its management. We sought to capture azithromycin practices among LTx providers internationally. A survey was distributed via the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and completed by 103 respondents (15 countries). Azithromycin indications, timing, and dosing varied significantly, and 37 (36%) reported inconsistency even within their center. Thirty (29%) reported initiating azithromycin prophylactically (during initial transplant hospitalization). Of 73 others, only 10 (14%) reported waiting until CLAD diagnosis (with persistent ≥20% pulmonary function decline). Most initiated azithromycin after a CLAD risk-factor/event, including 59 (81%) for a persistent ≥10% decrement in FEV 1 , 32 (44%) for lymphocytic bronchiolitis, and 27 (37%) for bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophilia . Azithromycin prescribing patterns appear to vary significantly, and further study is needed to elucidate the optimal timing and indications for its initiation after LTx.

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) who underwent lung transplant (LT) at a transplant center with an accredited Cystic Fibrosis Care Center (CFCC) in the United States. Methods We reviewed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for all adult patients with CF who received a first-time LT from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome was graft failure. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis and adjusted multilevel Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate outcomes in CF patients undergoing lung transplantation at a CFCC. Results 2,573 patients with CF underwent a first time LT during the study period. Of the 68 lung transplantation centers, 50 were CFCCs (73.5%). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients who underwent lung transplantation at a hospital with an accredited CFCC had a 33% reduction in risk of death or re-transplantation compared to those transplanted at a hospital without an accredited CFCC (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56-0.82, p Conclusion People with CF who undergo LT at a transplant center with a CFCC have improved graft survival and decreased need for re-transplantation compared to those who undergo LT at a non-CFCC, independent of volume.

Objective Provide recommendations to the cystic fibrosis (CF) community to facilitate timely referral for lung transplantation for individuals with CF. Methods The CF Foundation organized a multidisciplinary committee to develop CF Lung Transplant Referral Consensus Guidelines. Three workgroups were formed: timing for transplant referral; modifiable barriers to transplant; and transition to transplant care. A focus group of lung transplant recipients with CF and spouses of CF recipients informed guideline development. Results The committee formulated 21 recommendation statements based on literature review, committee member practices, focus group insights, and in response to public comment. Critical approaches to optimizing access to lung transplant include early discussion of this treatment option, assessment for modifiable barriers to transplant, and open communication between the CF and lung transplant centers. Conclusions These guidelines will help CF providers counsel their patients and may reduce the number of individuals with CF who die without consideration for lung transplant.

Rationale: New isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) is generally treated with inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotics such as tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS). A therapeutic approach that complements traditional antimicrobial therapy by reducing the risk of pulmonary exacerbation and inflammation may ultimately prolong the time to Pa recurrence. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that the addition of azithromycin to TIS in children with cystic fibrosis and early Pa decreases the risk of pulmonary exacerbation and prolongs the time to Pa recurrence. Methods: The OPTIMIZE (Optimizing Treatment for Early Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Cystic Fibrosis) trial was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 18-month trial in children with CF, 6 months to 18 years of age, with early Pa. Azithromycin or placebo was given 3× weekly with standardized TIS. Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoint was the time to pulmonary exacerbation requiring antibiotics and the secondary endpoint was the time to Pa recurrence, in addition to other clinical and safety outcomes. A total of 221 participants (111 placebo, 110 azithromycin) out of a planned 274 were enrolled. Enrollment was stopped early by the NHLBI because the trial had reached the prespecified interim boundary for efficacy. The risk of pulmonary exacerbation was reduced by 44% in the azithromycin group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–0.83; P = 0.004). Weight increased by 1.27 kg in the azithromycin group compared with the placebo group (95% confidence interval, 0.01–2.52; P = 0.046). No significant differences were seen in microbiological or other clinical or safety endpoints. Conclusions: Azithromycin was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of pulmonary exacerbation and a sustained improvement in weight, but had no impact on microbiological outcomes in children with early Pa. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02054156).

While remarkable advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) care have led to improvements in survival and quality of life, many individuals with CF are living with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD) and others will face continued disease progression and its associated complex treatments and choices. This review will provide a summary of recently published guidelines for ACFLD care and lung transplant referral and highlight ongoing work to enhance the care of those with ACFLD through improvements in medical and psychosocial care, palliative care, and care around lung transplantation.

Background Lung transplantation is a common therapeutic option for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) and advanced lung disease, yet many individuals with CF are not appropriately referred for evaluation. The present study sought to enhance CF transplant referral guidelines by integrating patient-centered input to identify possible psychosocial barriers contributing to suboptimal referral for appropriate CF transplant candidates. Methods As a component of developing the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Lung Transplant Referral Consensus Guidelines, we convened a focus group of lung transplant recipients with CF and two spouses of CF recipients. Each session involved standardized approaches to elicit qualitative, thematic content. Results CF patients and caregivers characterized five areas for improvement, which were integrated into formal CFF referral guidelines. These included (a) timing of transplant discussion with CF providers, (b) accuracy of transplant-related knowledge and expectations, (c) stigma associated with the need for transplantation, (d) treatment team transition issues, and (e) social support and mental health concerns. Earlier introduction of transplant, greater details regarding manageable aspects of treatment, and greater provision of social support were all associated with better psychosocial experiences. Conclusions Integrating patient-centered input into guideline development yielded important and previously unknown psychosocial barriers contributing to suboptimal transplant referral.

France implemented a high emergency lung transplantation (HELT) programme nationally in 2007. A similar programme does not exist in Canada. The objectives of our study were to compare health outcomes within France as well as between Canada and France before and after the HELT programme in a population with cystic fibrosis (CF).This population-based cohort study utilised data from the French and Canadian CF registries. A cumulative incidence curve assessed time to transplant with death without transplant as competing risks. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate post-transplant survival.Between 2002 and 2016, there were 1075 (13.0%) people with CF in France and 555 (10.2%) people with CF in Canada who underwent lung transplantation. The proportion of lung transplants increased in France after the HELT programme was initiated (4.5%Following the implementation of the HELT programme, people living with CF in France were more likely to receive a transplant than die. Post-transplant survival in the post-HELT period in France did not change compared with the pre-HELT period, despite potentially sicker patients being transplanted, and was comparable to Canada.

Background: Persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience high morbidity and mortality, yet little is known about their palliative care needs and how clinicians may address these needs. Objectives: (1) To identify palliative care and advance care planning needs of patients with CF and their families; and (2) to identify clinicians' potential roles in meeting these needs. Methods: A mixed-methods study of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe CF [forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))

BACKGROUND: Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). It is not known whether recent advances in care have affected the rates of chronic infection. We aimed to determine if the rates of developing new chronic P. aeruginosa infection among adolescents and adults with CF significantly changed over time. METHODS: The cohort consisted of individuals with CF followed in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry aged ≥13 years without chronic P. aeruginosa at baseline. Multivariable regression models accounting for within-patient correlation were used to assess the change in rate of developing chronic P. aeruginosa infection between 2003 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 15504 individuals were followed for a median of 5 (interquartile range, 2–9) years. The annual rates of developing new chronic P. aeruginosa decreased from 14.3% in 2003 to 6.4% in 2012. After adjusting for potential confounders, relative risk (RR) of developing chronic P. aeruginosa infection decreased significantly over time compared to 2003 (P value test of trend < .001). Compared with 2003, the RR of developing chronic P. aeruginosa infection in 2012 was 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.37). No significant increases in risk of chronic infections with other major CF bacterial pathogens relative to 2003 were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with CF, a significant decrease in the risk and rates of developing chronic P. aeruginosa infection between 2003 and 2012 was observed. Whether this decline results in changes in clinical outcomes warrants further exploration.

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has become increasing central to clinical research in medicine. CER seeks to conduct clinical trials that compare different commonly used interventions in real world settings (pragmatic clinical trials) and use a multitude of sources of evidence (including registries and cohort studies) to inform clinical decision making. CER also ensures that stake holders (patients, families, care providers, insurers) have a voice in the research process by integrating a formal stakeholder engagement as part of the research. This innovative approach to clinical research has distinct benefits and pitfalls. This review will first define what comparative effectiveness research is and then describe some of its benefits and then pitfalls. The focus will be on the role of CER in pediatrics.

First described as a disease of the pancreas, cystic fibrosis is a genetically inherited progressive disease affecting multiple organ systems. Pulmonary and pancreatic involvement is common in individuals with cystic fibrosis, and the former is attributable to most of the mortality that occurs with the condition. This chapter provides an overview of a clinical approach to the pulmonary and pancreatic manifestations of cystic fibrosis.

Background Lung transplantation (LTx) is frequently considered for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) when the FEV 1 reaches 1 Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the CF Foundation Patient Registry from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2013. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with FEV 1 Results There were 3,340 patients with an FEV 1 1 Conclusions Median survival was > 6.5 years for patients with CF and an FEV 1 1