Search

Table S1. Inter-tumor heterogeneity of T-cell densities in tumor microenvironment in dMMR vs pMMR stage III colon cancers

Figure S1 Study flow of N0147 patient tumor samples Figure S2 Heterogeneity of lymphocytic infiltrate between patients in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and proficient (pMMR) tumors. The distribution of T-cell densities (score 0-100) are shown as follows: (a) CD3+ in the core of the tumor, (b) CD8+ at the invasive margin, (c) CD8+ in the core of the tumor. For each T-cell subtype, density of tumor infiltration was higher in dMMR vs pMMR tumors (each p

Table S1: Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics. Table S2: mRNA/IHC AREG/EREG concordance table. Figure S1: AREG/EREG IHC scatterplot. Table S3: Prognostic effect of dichotomous AREG/EREG. Table S4: AREG/EREG and RECIST response rate. Table S5: AREG and EREG as individual continuous variables. Table S6: AREG/EREG predictive analyses adjusted for BRAF mutation, PTL and peritoneal metastases. Table S7: Exploratory analyses of different AREG/EREG cut points. Table S8: AREG/EREG IHC in biopsy and resection specimens.

Purpose:High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine practice due to issues with analytic precision and practicality. We investigated whether AREG/EREG IHC could predict benefit from the anti-EGFR agent panitumumab.Experimental Design:Artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to assess AREG/EREG IHC in 274 patients from the PICCOLO trial of irinotecan with or without panitumumab (Ir vs. IrPan) in RAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Models were repeated adjusting separately for BRAF mutation status and primary tumor location (PTL).Results:High ligand expression was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir [8.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.79; P = 0.001]; whereas low ligand expression was not (3.4 vs. 4.4 months; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74–1.49; P = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (Pinteraction = 0.02) and remained significant after adjustment for BRAF-mutation status and PTL. Likewise, RECIST RR was significantly improved in patients with high ligand expression (IrPan vs. Ir: 48% vs. 6%; P < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (25% vs. 14%; P = 0.10; Pinteraction = 0.01). The effect on OS was similar but not statistically significant.Conclusions:AREG/EREG IHC identified patients who benefitted from the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan chemotherapy. IHC is a practicable assay that may be of use in routine practice.

Purpose:Colorectal cancers with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) are presumed to uniformly have dense lymphocytic infiltration that underlies their favorable prognosis and is critical to their responsiveness to immunotherapy, as compared with MMR-proficient (pMMR) tumors. We examined T-cell densities and their potential heterogeneity in a large cohort of dMMR tumors.Experimental Design:CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were quantified at the invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (CT) in 561 stage III colon cancers (dMMR, n = 278; pMMR, n = 283) from a phase III adjuvant trial (N0147). Their association with overall survival (OS) was determined using multivariable Cox analysis.Results:Although CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities in the tumor microenvironment were higher in dMMR versus pMMR tumors overall, intertumoral heterogeneity in densities between tumors was significantly higher by 30% to 88% among dMMR versus pMMR cancers (P < 0.0001 for all four T-cell subtypes [CD3+IM, CD3+CT, CD8+IM, CD8+CT]). A substantial proportion of dMMR tumors (26% to 35% depending on the T-cell subtype) exhibited T-cell densities as low as that in the bottom half of pMMR tumors. All four T-cell subtypes were prognostic in dMMR with CD3+IM being the most strongly prognostic. Low (vs. high) CD3+IM was independently associated with poorer OS among dMMR (HR, 4.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.43–15.87; P = 0.0019) and pMMR tumors (P = 0.0103).Conclusions:Tumor-infiltrating T-cell densities exhibited greater intertumoral heterogeneity among dMMR than pMMR colon cancers, with CD3+IM providing robust stratification of both dMMR and pMMR tumors for prognosis. Potentially, lower T-cell densities among dMMR tumors may contribute to immunotherapy resistance.

Purpose: High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine practice due to issues with analytic precision and practicality. We investigated whether AREG/EREG IHC could predict benefit from the anti-EGFR agent panitumumab. Experimental Design: Artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to assess AREG/EREG IHC in 274 patients from the PICCOLO trial of irinotecan with or without panitumumab (Ir vs. IrPan) in RAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Models were repeated adjusting separately for BRAF mutation status and primary tumor location (PTL). Results: High ligand expression was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir [8.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.79; P = 0.001]; whereas low ligand expression was not (3.4 vs. 4.4 months; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74–1.49; P = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (Pinteraction = 0.02) and remained significant after adjustment for BRAF-mutation status and PTL. Likewise, RECIST RR was significantly improved in patients with high ligand expression (IrPan vs. Ir: 48% vs. 6%; P < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (25% vs. 14%; P = 0.10; Pinteraction = 0.01). The effect on OS was similar but not statistically significant. Conclusions: AREG/EREG IHC identified patients who benefitted from the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan chemotherapy. IHC is a practicable assay that may be of use in routine practice.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair (d-MMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), yet less than half of patients receive clinical benefit. We hypothesized that immune contexture including spatial distribution of cells expressing immune molecules in the tumor microenvironment may predict immunotherapy outcome. Methods: Primary CRC tissues from consecutive patients with d-MMR metastatic CRC (N=33) were treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (2015-2018). Tumors were stained for PD-L1, PD-1, CD8, CD3, CD68, LAG3, TGFβR2, MHC-I, CD14, B2M, DAPI and pan-cytokeratin in 5 compartments (overall tumor, tumor epithelia, tumor stroma, peritumor inside vs outside) by multiplex immunofluorescence with digital image analysis. Features computed within each image analysis region included positive cell density, fraction of positive cell types, intensity of positive cells, and spatial distribution between distinct cell types (distances measured using image analysis software). Prior to model fitting, feature selection was performed using regularized Cox regression with LASSO. Regularization parameter was chosen based on 5-fold cross validation. A Cox proportional hazards model was fitted to predict patient progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Among patients with d-MMR CRCs, 16/33 (48.4%) were female, 10 received first-line ICI therapy, and 23 had received > 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Median age was 61.6 years (IQR of 49.4, 73.7). Eight patients (24.2%) harbored BRAFV600E, 9 (27.2%) had mutant KRAS, and median PFS was 22.2 months (95% CI: 11.8, NR) with 20 events. PD-L1 was expressed in tumor cells, CD68+ macrophages, and CD3+ T lymphocytes. PD-1 expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes was also observed. By univariate analysis, only cell-cell distance readouts achieved statistical significance. Multivariable feature selection identified the mean number of PD-1+ cells within 10 microns of a PD-L1+ cell in the overall tumor as the strongest predictor of anti-PD-1 efficacy, and was significantly associated with PFS (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95, p< 0.001). In contrast, the ratio of PD-1+/PD-L1+ cells was not predictive of treatment efficacy (p= 0.47), thereby underscoring the importance of spatial distribution for PFS prediction. Conclusion: The mean number of PD-1+ cells in proximity to PD-L1+ cells in tumors was a predictive biomarker of anti-PD-1 efficacy. Confirmatory studies are warranted. Citation Format: Bahar Saberzadeh-Ardestani, Rondell P. Graham, Qian Shi, Eze Ahanonu, Sara McMahon, Crystal Williams, Antony Hubbard, Wenjun Zhang, Andrea Muranyi, Dongyao Yan, Kandavel Shanmugam, Frank A. Sinicrope. Prediction of anti-PD-1 efficacy based on immune marker densities and their spatial distribution in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6648.

This study leveraged a gene-protein assay to assess MYC and PTEN status at prostate cancer biopsy and examined the association with adverse outcomes after surgery. MYC gain and PTEN loss were simultaneously assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively, using 277 Grade Group 2 needle biopsies that were followed by prostatectomy. The maximal size of cribriform Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma (CRIB), the presence of intraductal carcinoma (IDC), and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma at biopsy were also annotated. MYC gain or PTEN loss was present in 19% and 18% of biopsies, respectively, whereas both alterations were present in 9% of biopsies. Tumors with one or both alterations were significantly more likely to have non–organ-confined disease (NOCD) at radical prostatectomy. In logistic regression models, including clinical stage, tumor volume on biopsy, and presence of CRIB/IDC, cases with MYC gain and PTEN loss remained at higher risk for NOCD (odds ratio, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.74–24.55; P = 0.005). The area under the curve for a baseline model using CAPRA variables (age, prostate-specific antigen, percentage of core involvement, clinical stage) was increased from 0.68 to 0.69 with inclusion of CRIB/IDC status and to 0.75 with MYC/PTEN status. Dual MYC/PTEN status can be assessed in a single slide and is independently associated with increased risk of NOCD for Grade Group 2 biopsies.

We analyzed patients withMedian PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab-based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with

203 Background: AREG and EREG are ligands of EGFR. AI assisted IHC evaluation of tumor AREG/EREG expression predicted benefit from anti-EGFR therapy in a retrospective analysis of the PICCOLO trial of second-line irinotecan ± panitumumab. Here, we sought to validate those findings through an analysis of patients who received anti-EGFR therapy during routine care for mCRC. Methods: Patients (pts) with available archival FFPE tumor tissue who received panitumumab or cetuximab ± chemotherapy at any time for treatment of mCRC at 8 UK cancer centers were eligible. Central RAS testing by next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for pts where extended RAS testing had not been previously undertaken. RAS-mutant (mut) and RAS-unknown pts were excluded from the primary analysis population. AREG and EREG positive tumor cells were identified by IHC, performed locally at 6 of 8 sites. Pathologists annotated tumor areas on digital images of glass slides. AI algorithms calculated the percentage of tumor cells staining positive for AREG and EREG within tumor areas. More than 20% AREG and/or EREG tumor cell positivity was regarded as high biomarker expression, the optimal cut-point identified in PICCOLO. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and locally reported response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Of 541 pts recruited, 494 (91.3%) had adequate archival tissue for analysis. Central RAS testing was successfully performed in 255 of 393 (64.9%) pts without existing extended RAS results, leading to 45 exclusions, leaving 449 pts in the primary analysis population. 26 (5.8%) pts were BRAF-mut. 110 (24.5%) received concomitant FOLFOX and 304 (67.7%) FOLFIRI. After adjustment for additional prognostic factors, high AREG/EREG expression (n = 360; 80.2%) was associated with significantly prolonged PFS (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95; p = 0.02), OS (HR 0.66 [0.50-0.86]; p = 0.002), and DCR (OR 1.92 [1.05-3.54]; p = 0.04), but not RR (unadjusted OR 1.39 [0.83-2.33]; p = 0.21). Median PFS in the high vs low biomarker groups was 8.5 vs 4.4 months; median OS 16.4 vs 8.9 months. The significant difference in OS (high vs low) was maintained in the subgroup with right-sided primary tumor location (n = 107; 23.8%) (HR 0.56 [0.37-0.86]; p = 0.007). Conclusions: High tumor AREG/EREG expression was associated with significantly prolonged PFS, OS and DCR among a cohort of pts treated with anti-EGFR therapy during routine care of mCRC. The prognostic effect observed validates the predictive effect of AREG/EREG seen in the PICCOLO trial, where AREG/EREG had no prognostic effect in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. A prospective biomarker-led trial is in set-up to support the use of AREG/EREG IHC in clinical practice.

204 Background: High CD3+ (all) and CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cell densities in the core (CT) and invasive margin (IM) of primary CRCs have been shown to be associated with superior prognosis at all stages of disease. Their predictive effect on benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage CRC has not been tested. Methods: FFPE samples from participants (pts) in the QUASAR trial (adjuvant fluorouracil/folinic acid vs observation in stage 2/3 CRC) were analysed for CD3 and CD8 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Pathologists annotated the core and peritumor areas on digital slide images. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms delineated the CT and IM, and calculated the densities (cells/mm2) of each marker in each region (CD3-CT, CD3-IM, CD8-CT, CD8-IM). Pts were randomly partitioned into test and validation sets (1:1). In the test set, each measure’s prognostic effect on recurrence-free interval (RFI) (primary endpoint), colorectal cancer mortality (CCM) and overall survival (OS) in each trial arm was assessed. Maximum likelihoods methods were used to develop optimal cut-points. Analyses were repeated in the validation set. Analysis of 425 pts in each set would give > 95% power (α = 0.05, 2-sided) to detect a twofold difference in recurrence risk. In predictive analyses, 2-year recurrence rate was the primary outcome; biomarker-treatment interactions were assessed. Results: Tumor tissue from 868 pts (797 [92%] stage 2; 531 [61%] colon) was analysed, with evaluable results for CD3-CT in 851 (98.0%), CD3-IM in 833 (96.0%), CD8-CT in 849 (97.0%) and CD8-IM in 820 (94.5%) pts. In the test set, optimal cut-points of 318, 798, 81 and 186 cells/mm2 were defined for CD3-CT, CD3-IM, CD8-CT and CD8-IM respectively. The recurrence rate in the high-risk group was twice that in the low-risk group for all measures (CD3-CT: rate ratio [RR] 2.00, [95%CI 1.33-2.94], p = 0.0008; CD3-IM: 2.38, [1.59-3.57], p < 0.00001; CD8-CT: 2.17, [1.59-3.57], p = 0.0001; CD8-IM: 2.13 [1.43-3.23], p = 0.0001), which was closely replicated in the validation set (CD3-CT: RR 1.96, [1.30-2.94], p = 0.002; CD3-IM: 1.79, [1.18-2.70], p = 0.005; CD8-CT: 1.72, [1.18-2.56], p = 0.005; CD8-IM: 1.72 [1.15-2.56], p = 0.008). In multivariate analyses, prognostic effects were similar in colon and rectal cancers, and in stage 2 and 3 disease. CD3/8 counts were not predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, with similar efficacy in the high and low risk groups. Conclusions: AI-assisted CD3 and CD8 counts were strongly associated with tumor recurrence rates. With no biomarker-treatment interactions, proportional reductions in recurrence with chemotherapy were similar in high and low-risk disease. Hence, numbers of high-risk patients needed to treat to prevent one recurrence were about half the number for low-risk patients.

Purpose HER2 amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of HER2 amplification in mCRC. Patients and Methods We analyzed patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), HER2 amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization ( HER2 amplification: HER2/CEP17 ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with HER2 amplification and 54 HER2 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing ( HER2 amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab–based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with HER2 amplification compared with HER2 nonamplified patients (2.8 v 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; P < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for HER2 amplified v nonamplified: 2.8 v 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; P < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among HER2-amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 v 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; P = .66). In multivariable analyses, HER2 amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; P < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; P < .001). Conclusion HER2 amplification in RAS/RAF wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC for HER2 amplification should be considered before anti-EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.

Purpose: Colorectal cancers with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) are presumed to uniformly have dense lymphocytic infiltration that underlies their favorable prognosis and is critical to their responsiveness to immunotherapy, as compared with MMR-proficient (pMMR) tumors. We examined T-cell densities and their potential heterogeneity in a large cohort of dMMR tumors. Experimental Design: CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities were quantified at the invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (CT) in 561 stage III colon cancers (dMMR, n = 278; pMMR, n = 283) from a phase III adjuvant trial (N0147). Their association with overall survival (OS) was determined using multivariable Cox analysis. Results: Although CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities in the tumor microenvironment were higher in dMMR versus pMMR tumors overall, intertumoral heterogeneity in densities between tumors was significantly higher by 30% to 88% among dMMR versus pMMR cancers (P < 0.0001 for all four T-cell subtypes [CD3+IM, CD3+CT, CD8+IM, CD8+CT]). A substantial proportion of dMMR tumors (26% to 35% depending on the T-cell subtype) exhibited T-cell densities as low as that in the bottom half of pMMR tumors. All four T-cell subtypes were prognostic in dMMR with CD3+IM being the most strongly prognostic. Low (vs. high) CD3+IM was independently associated with poorer OS among dMMR (HR, 4.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.43–15.87; P = 0.0019) and pMMR tumors (P = 0.0103). Conclusions: Tumor-infiltrating T-cell densities exhibited greater intertumoral heterogeneity among dMMR than pMMR colon cancers, with CD3+IM providing robust stratification of both dMMR and pMMR tumors for prognosis. Potentially, lower T-cell densities among dMMR tumors may contribute to immunotherapy resistance.

High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine practice due to issues with analytic precision and practicality. We investigated whether AREG/EREG IHC could predict benefit from the anti-EGFR agent panitumumab.Artificial intelligence algorithms were developed to assess AREG/EREG IHC in 274 patients from the PICCOLO trial of irinotecan with or without panitumumab (Ir vs. IrPan) inHigh ligand expression was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir [8.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.79;AREG/EREG IHC identified patients who benefitted from the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan chemotherapy. IHC is a practicable assay that may be of use in routine practice.

111 Background: High tumor mRNA levels of the EGFR ligands, AREG and EREG are associated with anti-EGFR agent response in patients (pts) with RAS-wt mCRC, regardless of tumor location. However, ligand RNA assays have not been adopted into routine clinical practice due to issues with analytical precision and practicality. Here we test whether AREG and EREG expression assessed by IHC can predict benefit from Pan. Methods: A retrospective biomarker study within the PICCOLO trial (NCT00389870; irinotecan [Ir] ± Pan in fluoropyrimidine-resistant RAS-wt mCRC). AREG and EREG positive tumor cells were assessed by IHC in all RAS-wt patients with available tumor tissue. Pathologists annotated tumor areas on digital images of glass slides. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms calculated the percentage of tumor cells staining positive for AREG and EREG within the tumor areas. More than 50% AREG and/or EREG tumor cell positivity was regarded as high ligand expression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were RECIST response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 274 RAS-wt pts had available tumor tissue. High ligand expression (n = 132) was associated with significant PFS benefit from IrPan compared with Ir (8.0 vs 3.2 months; HR 0.54 [0.37-0.79]; p = 0.001); whereas low ligand expression (n = 142) was not (3.4 vs 4.4 months; HR 1.05 [95% CI, 0.74-1.49]; p = 0.78). The ligand-treatment interaction was significant (p = 0.02) and independent of BRAF-mutation status and primary tumor location. Likewise RR was significantly improved in pts with high ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 48% vs 6%; risk ratio, 7.8 [2.90-20.69]; p < 0.0001) but not those with low ligand expression (IrPan vs Ir: 25% vs 14%; risk ratio, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.89-3.65]; p = 0.10) (interaction p = 0.01). Lesser effect was seen on OS. Conclusions: IHC assessment of AREG and EREG identified pts who did or did not benefit from Pan, as has been previously demonstrated through mRNA quantification. IHC represents a more practicable technique as it can be provided at the point of care and is associated with shorter turn-around times. AREG and EREG IHC may be of use in routine practice to identify patients who would benefit from anti-EGFR therapy and those for whom alternative treatment strategies should be explored.

Aberrant cellular signaling networks are implicated in major diseases including cancer, but are difficult to reliably quantitate, as many signaling proteins are expressed at low abundance and further reduced following specimen collection. MTIP is an integrated tissue-imaging platform that leverages bright, fluorescent reporters and sensitive spectral instrumentation, along with automated staining, image acquisition and non-parametric image analysis, to attain reproducible, multiplexed quantitation of signaling proteins in tissue. MTIP captured the phosphoactivity of six key PI3K/MAPK proteins (pAKTS473, pAKT308, pPRAS40, pS6, peIF4G and pERK1/2) at high precision (coefficient of variation, CV

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) are presumed to uniformly have dense lymphocytic infiltration that underlies their favorable prognosis and is critical to their responsiveness to immunotherapy, as compared to MMR-proficient (pMMR) tumors. We examined T-cell densities and their potential heterogeneity in a large cohort of dMMR tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CD3(+) and CD8(+) T-cell densities were quantified at the invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (CT) in 561 stage III colon cancers (dMMR, n=278; pMMR, n=283) from a phase 3 adjuvant trial (N0147). Their association with overall survival (OS) was determined using multivariable Cox analysis. RESULTS: While CD3(+) and CD8(+) T-cell densities in the tumor microenvironment were higher in dMMR vs pMMR tumors overall, inter-tumoral heterogeneity in densities between tumors was significantly higher by 30–88% among dMMR vs pMMR cancers (P

Background We assessed the novel MACC1 gene to further stratify stage II colon cancer patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR). Patients and methods Four cohorts with 596 patients were analyzed: Charite 1 discovery cohort was assayed for MACC1 mRNA expression and MMR in cryo-preserved tumors. Charite 2 comparison cohort was used to translate MACC1 qRT-PCR analyses to FFPE samples. In the BIOGRID 1 training cohort MACC1 mRNA levels were related to MACC1 protein levels from immunohistochemistry in FFPE sections; also analyzed for MMR. Chemotherapy-naive pMMR patients were stratified by MACC1 mRNA and protein expression to establish risk groups based on recurrence-free survival (RFS). Risk stratification from BIOGRID 1 was confirmed in the BIOGRID 2 validation cohort. Pooled BIOGRID datasets produced a best effect-size estimate. Results In BIOGRID 1, using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for MACC1 detection, pMMR/MACC1-low patients had a lower recurrence probability versus pMMR/MACC1-high patients (5-year RFS of 92% and 67% versus 100% and 68%, respectively). In BIOGRID 2, longer RFS was confirmed for pMMR/MACC1-low versus pMMR/MACC1-high patients (5-year RFS of 100% versus 90%, respectively). In the pooled dataset, 6.5% of patients were pMMR/MACC1-low with no disease recurrence, resulting in a 17% higher 5-year RFS [95% confidence interval (CI) (12.6%–21.3%)] versus pMMR/MACC1-high patients (P = 0.037). Outcomes were similar for pMMR/MACC1-low and deficient MMR (dMMR) patients (5-year RFS of 100% and 96%, respectively). Conclusions MACC1 expression stratifies colon cancer patients with unfavorable pMMR status. Stage II colon cancer patients with pMMR/MACC1-low tumors have a similar favorable prognosis to those with dMMR with potential implications for the role of adjuvant therapy.

3532 Background: Colorectal cancer with dMMR display heterogeneity in the extent of intratumoral T-cell infiltration which may explain their variable responsiveness to PD-1 blockade. We examined the association of intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell densities (TCD) with objective response rate (ORR) and response duration in patients with dMMR mCRCs receiving pembrolizumab (PEM). Methods: Record review was performed on 12 patients with dMMR mCRC treated with PEM (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) after failure of prior chemotherapy [median no. of regimens was 1 (range 1-4)] between 01/2015 and 12/2017. CD3+ and CD8+ TCDs were analyzed in the primary tumor core (CT) and at the invasive margin (IM) by immunohistochemistry and automated image analysis to determine density score (0 to 100) for each T-cell subtype and compartment (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). Patients were categorized as 1) responders [CR (complete response) + PR (partial response)] vs. non responders [SD (stable disease) + PD (progressive disease)] per RECIST version 1.1, and 2) by duration of response (< or > 12 months). Results: Median follow-up post PEM was 19.5 (9-41) months. Responders included 2 CR and 5 PR; non-responders included 4 SD and 1 PD. The ORR and median time to response were 58.3% (7/12) and 12 weeks (range 9-40), respectively. CD3+ and CD8+ TCD scores were higher in responders vs. in non-responders as well as in patients who had disease control for > 12 months; differences were greatest for CD8+ CT (Table). Conclusions: Among patients treated with PEM, data suggest higher intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ TCDs in responders versus non-responders and in those with a longer duration of disease control. If confirmed, TCDs may potentially predict responsiveness to PD-1 blockade in dMMR mCRCs. [Table: see text]

BACKGROUND A point mutation (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene is a prognostic biomarker and may predict for nonresponse to anti-EGFR antibody therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. BRAFV600E mutations are frequently detected in tumors with microsatellite instability and indicate a sporadic origin. We used a mutation-specific antibody to examine mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with BRAFV600E mutation data. METHODS Primary stage III colon carcinomas were analyzed for BRAFV600E mutations in exon 15, and 50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild-type tumors were selected for analysis of BRAF proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed in archival tissue specimens using a pan-BRAF antibody and a mutation-specific antibody against BRAFV600E proteins. Staining was scored by 2 pathologists who were blinded to clinical and mutation data. RESULTS Using a pan-BRAF antibody, total BRAF protein expression was observed in the tumor cell cytoplasm in 74 of 75 colon carcinomas. A mutation-specific antibody identified diffuse cytoplasmic staining of mutant BRAFV600E proteins in 49 of 74 cancers. Analysis using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay revealed that all 49 of these cancers carried BRAFV600E mutations. In contrast, BRAFV600E staining was absent in all 25 tumors that carried wild-type copies of BRAF. CONCLUSIONS A BRAF mutation-specific (V600E) antibody detected tumors with BRAFV600E mutations and exhibited complete concordance with a DNA-based method. These results support the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen colorectal cancers for BRAFV600E mutations in clinical practice. Cancer 2013;119:2765–2770. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: Prognostic markers that identify patients with stage II colon cancers who are at the risk of recurrence are essential to personalize therapy. We evaluated the potential of GIV/Girdin as a predictor of recurrence risk in such patients. Experimental Design: Expression of full-length GIV was evaluated by IHC using a newly developed mAb together with a mismatch repair (MMR)-specific antibody panel in three stage II colon cancer patient cohorts, that is, a training (n = 192), test (n = 317), and validation (n = 181) cohort, with clinical follow-up data. Recurrence risk stratification models were established in the training cohort of T3, proficient MMR (pMMR) patients without chemotherapy and subsequently validated. Results: For T3 pMMR tumors, GIV expression and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were the only factors predicting recurrence in both training (GIV: HR, 2.78, P = 0.013; LVI: HR, 2.54, P = 0.025) and combined test and validation (pooled) cohorts (GIV: HR, 1.85, P = 0.019; LVI: HR, 2.52, P = 0.0004). A risk model based on GIV expression and LVI status classified patients into high- or low-risk groups; 3-year recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in the high-risk versus low-risk group across all cohorts [Training: 52.3% vs. 84.8%; HR, 3.74, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50–9.32; Test: 85.9% vs. 97.9%, HR, 7.83, 95% CI, 1.03–59.54; validation: 59.4% vs. 84.4%, HR, 3.71, 95% CI, 1.24–11.12]. Conclusions: GIV expression status predicts recurrence risk in patients with T3 pMMR stage II colon cancer. A risk model combining GIV expression and LVI status information further enhances prediction of recurrence. Further validation studies are warranted before GIV status can be routinely included in patient management algorithms. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3488–98. ©2016 AACR.

3598Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) with dMMR typically have abundant TILs indicating an enhanced host immune response. However, the prognostic impact of TILs identified by CD3+ and CD8+ T cel...

MUC1, a transmembrane mucin, is a key modulator of several signaling pathways that affect oncogenesis, motility, and cell morphology. The interaction of MUC1 cytoplasmic tail (MUC1CT) with signal transducers and its nuclear translocation and subsequent biological responses are believed to be regulated by phosphorylation status, but the precise mechanisms by which this occurs remain poorly defined. We detected a novel association between the Met receptor tyrosine kinase and the MUC1CT. Met catalyzed phosphorylation of tyrosine at YHPM in the MUC1CT. Stimulation of S2-013.MUC1F pancreatic cancer cells with hepatocyte growth factor facilitated nuclear localization of MUC1CT, as determined by real time confocal imaging analysis. MUC1 overexpression also facilitated faster turnover of Met. Phosphorylation of MUC1CT by Met enhanced its interaction with p53, which led to suppression of AP1 transcription factor activity through interactions at the MMP1 promoter, ultimately leading to reduced transcription of MMP1. This correlated with a decrease in hepatocyte growth factor-induced invasiveness when MUC1 was overexpressed. The results demonstrate that MUC1 modulates Met-mediated oncogenic signaling in cancer.

MUC1 is a heterodimeric transmembrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in ductal adenocarcinomas. Differential phosphorylation of the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail (MUC1CT) has been associated with signaling events that influence the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells. We identified a novel tyrosine phosphorylation site (HGRYVPP) in the MUC1CT by mass spectrometric analysis of MUC1 from human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. Analyses in vitro and in vivo showed that platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) catalyzed phosphorylation of this site and of tyrosine in the RDTYHPM site. Stimulation of S2-013.MUC1F cells with PDGF-BB increased nuclear colocalization of MUC1CT and β-catenin. PDGF-BB stimulation had no significant effect on cell proliferation rate; however, it enhanced invasion in vitro through Matrigel and in vivo tumor growth and metastases. Invasive properties of the cells were significantly altered on expression of phosphorylation-abrogating or phosphorylation-mimicking mutations at these sites. We propose that interactions of MUC1 and PDGFRβ induce signal transduction events that influence the metastatic properties of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [Cancer Res 2007;67(11):5201–10]

Much of the ability of the MUC1 oncoprotein to foster tumorigenesis and tumor progression likely originates from the interaction of its cytoplasmic tail with proteins involved in oncogenic signaling. Many of these interactions are regulated by phosphorylation, as the cytoplasmic tail contains seven highly conserved tyrosines and several serine/threonine phosphorylation sites. We have developed a cell line–based model system to study the effects of tyrosine phosphorylation on MUC1 signaling, with particular emphasis on its effects on gene transcription. COS-7 cells, which lack endogenous MUC1, were stably infected with wild-type MUC1 or a MUC1 construct lacking all seven tyrosines (MUC1 Y0) and analyzed for effects on transcription mediated by the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways. COS.MUC1 Y0 cells showed heightened active ERK1/2 with increased activator protein-1 (AP-1) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) transcriptional activity; there was also a simultaneous decrease in NF-κB transcriptional activity and nuclear localization. These changes altered the phenotype of COS.MUC1 Y0 cells, as this line displayed increased invasion and enhanced [3H]thymidine incorporation. Analysis of the three lines also showed significant differences in their cell cycle profile and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation when the cells were serum starved. These data support the growing evidence that MUC1 is involved in transcriptional regulation and link MUC1 for the first time to the NF-κB pathway. (Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(7):489–97)

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyse the immunophenotypic and molecular features of a large series of follicular lymphomas, focusing in particular on atypical cases that fail to express CD10 and/or bcl-2. Such cases present diagnostic pitfalls, especially with regard to the differential diagnosis from follicular hyperplasia and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Therefore, we also included an immunohistochemical evaluation of stathmin, which is strongly expressed by germinal centre B cells, as a putative new marker for follicular lymphomas, particularly those with an atypical phenotype. Methods and results: Two hundred and five follicular lymphomas were investigated with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The use of three distinct anti-bcl-2 antibodies together with CD10 expression data and FISH analysis for bcl-2 and bcl-6 rearrangements allowed subclassification of follicular lymphoma into four distinct subgroups: (i) CD10-positive/bcl-2-positive, (ii) CD10-positive/bcl-2-negative, (iii) CD10-negative/bcl-2-positive, and (iv) CD10-negative/bcl-2-negative. All cases were bcl-6-positive. STMN1 (stathmin) was shown to be helpful in diagnosing bcl-2-negative and/or CD10-negative follicular lymphomas, and in their distinction from marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Conclusions: Combined immunohistological and molecular analyses reveal that follicular lymphomas showing an atypical immunophenotypic and molecular profile exist, and we demonstrate that STMN1 represents a novel useful diagnostic marker for these. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

We have previously identified the gene Metastasis-Associated in Colon Cancer 1 (MACC1). MACC1 acts a prognostic biomarker for tumor progression, metastasis and patient survival for a broad variety of solid cancer types. Here we assessed if the MACC1 gene could separate stage II colon cancer patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) into high- and low-risk groups who might benefit from or be spared adjuvant chemotherapy based on their prognosis. In the Charité 1 discovery cohort (n=61), MACC1 expression and MSI status were assayed by qRT-PCR in cryo-preserved tumors from CRC patients. MSS/MSI-low/MACC1-low tumors showed better survival vs. MSS/MSI-low/MACC1-high (P Citation Format: Ulrich-Peter Rohr, Pia Herrmann, Katharina Ilm, Hai Zhang, Sabine Lohmann, Astrid Reiser, Andrea Muranyi, Janice Smith, Susen Burock, Marc Osterland, Katherine Leith, Shalini Singh, Patrick Brunhoeber, Rebecca Bowermaster, Jeanne Tie, Michael Christie, Hui-Li Wong, Paul Waring, Kandavel Shanmugam, Peter Gibbs, Ulrike S. Stein. Combination of DNA mismatch repair status and MACC1 expression in patients with stage II colon cancer: The BIOGRID studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2778. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2778

614 Background: Trial data, while valuable, does not reflect the importance of a biomarker or treatment in the general population as trials generally exclude patients (pts) due to age or comorbidities. We used merged large population datasets to validate a linked anonymized stage II CRC pt cohort as representative of the population to identify the prognostic and predictive value of deficient mismatch repair (MMR) and a new biomarker Ga-interacting vesicle-associated protein (GIV). Methods: English national data on stage II CRC pts surgically treated from 2001-2015, n = 92,147, were analyzed for survival and clinicopathological parameters. Anonymized data were then linked to pathology and a subset of 405 unselected pts surgically treated from 1990-2003 at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. These were investigated for 5 antibodies. 4 identified deficient MMR status and one was a new marker; GIV. Results: Population data vs the cohort of 405 pts showed a median age of 73 vs 74 yrs, M:F 55%:45% vs. 53%:47%. These are older than seen in most clinical trials and more reflective of the general stage II CRC population. The median survivals of 108 vs 92 months are as expected based on relative time periods covered. 374 patients yielded valid MMR status on immunohistochemistry (92%); 17% were dMMR and 83% were proficient. dMMR vs pMMR pts did not differ in age (median age 75 vs 74.5) or distribution of T3 (69% vs 66%), but were more likely to be female (71% vs 42%), sited in the right colon (76% vs 30%) and poorly differentiated (42% vs 8%). 11% of dMMR and 8% of pMMR received adjuvant chemotherapy in this cohort. GIV scoring status was also evaluated (405): 30% (121) were negative, 65% (264) positive and 5% (20) were not scored. Survival and risk scores by MMR and GIV status will be presented. Conclusions: Population based data has been created to validate the representativeness of a stage II biomarker cohort. This approach using large, population based data-sets provides opportunities to understand the generalizability of biomarker cohorts. The creation and expansion of such cohorts will more effectively validate existing and new biomarkers and treatments in real-world populations.

Progressive liver fibrosis is characterized by the deposition of collagen by activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Activation of HSCs is a multiple receptor-driven process in which profibrotic signals are enhanced, and anti-fibrotic pathways are suppressed. Here we report the discovery of a novel signaling platform comprised of G protein subunit, Gαi and GIV, its guanine exchange factor (GEF), which serves as a central hub within the fibrogenic signalling network initiated by diverse classes of receptors. GIV is expressed in the liver after fibrogenic injury and is required for HSC activation. Once expressed, GIV enhances the profibrotic (PI3K-Akt-FoxO1 and TGFβ-SMAD) and inhibits the anti-fibrotic (cAMP-PKA-pCREB) pathways to skew the signalling network in favor of fibrosis, all via activation of Gαi. We also provide evidence that GIV may serve as a biomarker for progression of fibrosis after liver injury and a therapeutic target for arresting and/or reversing HSC activation during liver fibrosis.

Methods for screening protein–protein interactions are useful in protein science and for the generation of drug leads. We set out to develop a simplified assay to rapidly test protein–protein interactions, with a library of 400 pentapeptides comprising the 20 natural amino acids at two variable positions followed by three glycines (NH2-X1X2GGG). The library was used to identify the epitope of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 10D11 directed against the HOXD4 protein. Three pentapeptide ‘hits’ were selected (VYGGG, PWGGG and WKGGG) from direct binding assays screening for pentapeptide•mAb interactions; and from assays using pentapeptides in solution to competitively block HOXD4•mAb interactions. Alignment of the three ‘hit’ pentapeptides to the HOXD4 sequence predicts the mAb 10D11 epitope as NH2-VYPWMK. Synthesis of NH2-VYPWMK hexapeptide confirmed this prediction; and an alanine scan of HOXD4 ablated binding by mAb 10D11 when amino acids in the putative epitope were mutated. We propose that these simplified but diverse libraries can be used for rapid epitope mapping of some mAbs, and for generating lead small peptide analogs that interfere with receptor–ligand or other protein–protein interactions, or with enzymatic activity.

Hox genes encode transcription factors that are major determinants of embryonic patterning. Recently, we and others have shown that specific recognition of target sites in DNA is partly achieved through cooperative interaction with the extradenticle/pre-B-cell transformation-related gene (EXD/PBX) family of homeodomain-containing proteins. This interaction is mediated by the YPWM motif present N-terminal to the homeodomain in HOX proteins. In the present study, we use YPWM peptides to confirm the importance of this motif for mediating HOX/PBX interactions. We also used a novel monoclonal antibody directed against the YPWM to show that occlusion of this motif abrogates cooperativity with PBX. In addition, we present evidence that residues flanking the YPWM, both N-terminally and C-terminally, stabilize the HOX·PBX cooperative complex. Because these flanking residues are also conserved among paralogs, they are likely to help distinguish the specificity of HOX/PBX interactions. Our data further show that the relative importance of individual residues within and flanking the YPWM is dependent on the identity of position 6 of the cooperative binding site (TGATTNATGG). These results suggest that interactions between PBX and the YPWM motif are modified by a base pair predicted to contact the N-terminal arm of the HOX homeodomain.

A point mutation (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene is a prognostic biomarker and may predict for nonresponse to anti-EGFR antibody therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. BRAFV600E mutations are frequently detected in tumors with microsatellite instability and indicate a sporadic origin. We used a mutation-specific antibody to examine mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with BRAFV600E mutation data.Primary stage III colon carcinomas were analyzed for BRAFV600E mutations in exon 15, and 50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild-type tumors were selected for analysis of BRAF proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed in archival tissue specimens using a pan-BRAF antibody and a mutation-specific antibody against BRAFV600E proteins. Staining was scored by 2 pathologists who were blinded to clinical and mutation data.Using a pan-BRAF antibody, total BRAF protein expression was observed in the tumor cell cytoplasm in 74 of 75 colon carcinomas. A mutation-specific antibody identified diffuse cytoplasmic staining of mutant BRAFV600E proteins in 49 of 74 cancers. Analysis using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay revealed that all 49 of these cancers carried BRAFV600E mutations. In contrast, BRAFV600E staining was absent in all 25 tumors that carried wild-type copies of BRAF.A BRAF mutation-specific (V600E) antibody detected tumors with BRAFV600E mutations and exhibited complete concordance with a DNA-based method. These results support the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen colorectal cancers for BRAFV600E mutations in clinical practice.

ATP (CTP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase (EC 2.7.7.25) was purified to apparent homogeneity from a crude extract of Lupinus albus seeds. Purification was accomplished using a multistep protocol including ammonium sulfate fractionation and chromatography on anion-exchange, hydroxylapatite and affinity columns. The lupin enzyme exhibited a pH optimum and salt and ion requirements that were similar to those of tRNA nucleotidyltransferases from other sources. Oligonucleotides, based on partial amino acid sequence of the purified protein, were used to isolate the corresponding cDNA. The cDNA potentially encodes a protein of 560 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 64 164 Da in good agreement with the apparent molecular mass of the pure protein determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The size and predicted amino acid sequence of the lupin enzyme are more similar to the enzyme from yeast than from Escherichia coli with some blocks of amino acid sequence conserved among all three enzymes. Functionality of the lupin cDNA was shown by complementation of a temperature-sensitive mutation in the yeast tRNA nucleotidyltransferase gene. While the lupin cDNA compensated for the nucleocytoplasmic defect in the yeast mutant it did not enable the mutant strain to grow at the non-permissive temperature on a non-fermentable carbon source.

3576Background: Tumor associated immune response impacts outcomes in cancer. In colon cancer (CC), a good immune response, as represented by a dense lymphocytic infiltrate, is known to be associate...

3517Background: HER2 amplification (HERamp), seen in 5% of KRAS wildtype (WT) metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC), is associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies...

Increased motility and invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells are associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). Snai1 and Slug are zinc-finger transcription factors that trigger this process by repressing E-cadherin and enhancing vimentin and N-cadherin protein expression. However, the mechanisms that regulate this activation in pancreatic tumors remain elusive. MUC1, a transmembrane mucin glycoprotein, is associated with the most invasive forms of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA). In this study, we show that over expression of MUC1 in pancreatic cancer cells triggers the molecular process of EMT, which translates to increased invasiveness and metastasis. EMT was significantly reduced when MUC1 was genetically deleted in a mouse model of PDA or when all seven tyrosines in the cytoplasmic tail of MUC1 were mutated to phenylalanine (mutated MUC1 CT). Using proteomics, RT-PCR and western blotting, we revealed a significant increase in vimentin, Slug and Snail expression with repression of E-Cadherin in MUC1-expressing cells compared with cells expressing the mutated MUC1 CT. In the cells that carried the mutated MUC1 CT, MUC1 failed to co-immunoprecipitate with β-catenin and translocate to the nucleus, thereby blocking transcription of the genes associated with EMT and metastasis. Thus, functional tyrosines are critical in stimulating the interactions between MUC1 and β-catenin and their nuclear translocation to initiate the process of EMT. This study signifies the oncogenic role of MUC1 CT and is the first to identify a direct role of the MUC1 in initiating EMT during pancreatic cancer. The data may have implications in future design of MUC1-targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer.

s S387 Material and Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 186 primary colorectal carcinomas and four normal colorectal tissues were immunostained using specific monoclonal antibodies against Tn and sialyl-Tn antigens. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and overall 5-year survival were correlated with antigen expression. Results: Of the 186 colorectal carcinomas, Tn antigen is expressed in 70 (37.6%) and sialyl-Tn antigen is expressed in 141 (75.8%). There is no staining for these antigens in normal colorectal tissues. Immunostaining measurements for Tn antigen were significantly associated with the differentiation degree (p = 0.017) of the tumors, but independent of age, gender, tumor location, depth of penetration, status of lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and TNM stage. The expression results of sialyl-Tn antigen revealed more significant associations with the degree of differentiation (p = 0.006) and perineural invasion (p = 0.041). The poor overall survival rate of patients was significantly associated with the positive expression of sialyl-Tn (p = 0.013) but not with the expression of Tn (p = 0.650). Survival at 5 years for patients with sialyl-Tn-negative versus sialyl-Tn-positive tumors was 72.1% versus 49.2%. Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that TNM stage (p = 0.001) and sialyl-Tn expression (p = 0.038) were the two most important variables of for predicting overall survival. Conclusions: These results indicate that Tn and sialyl-Tn antigens appear to be useful biomarkers of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and mucinous carcinomas. Moreover, the positive expression of sialyl-Tn antigen is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in human colorectal carcinoma. No conflict of interest.

Aim: There is an evident unmet need to better define recurrence risk for patients with stage II colon cancer (CC), particularly those with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) tumors, to determine the subgroup of patients that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. GIV/Girdin is a novel metastasis associated protein that triggers tumor cell invasion by enhancing PI3K/AKT signaling downstream of multiple oncogenic receptors. We explored the potential of GIV as a prognostic marker in stage II CC. Methods: A MMR antibody panel and a GIV specific antibody were developed by Ventana and evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a cohort of stage II CC from Melbourne (n = 192), enriched for patients with recurrent disease (n = 44, 25%). Log rank test was used to assess the association of GIV IHC expression status with the recurrence risk. Evaluation of alternative GIV scoring algorithms, combining staining intensity and percent staining, and statistical predictive modeling including the analysis of distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) was undertaken for the chemo-naive cases, stratified by MMR and AJCC tumor (T) status. The association between GIV IHC status and standard histopathologic criteria was also assessed. Results: The distribution of deficient MMR (dMMR) vs pMMR cases were 20.8% and 79.2%, respectively. Within the chemo-naive population (n = 103), expected associations between pathologic features and DRFS were observed, including pMMR vs dMMR (HR 4.12, p = 0.052), T4 vs T3 (HR 2.39, p = 0.055) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) vs no LVI (HR 2.62, p = 0.021). GIV positivity, defined as >10% of tumor cells stained or any staining of 3+ intensity, was present in 45 (44.0%) of pMMR chemo-naive cases. For T3 pMMR chemo-naive cases (n = 91), GIV positivity was associated with significantly reduced DRFS (HR 2.49, p = 0.022). Adding LVI as an additional parameter to the algorithm for this group increased the HR to 4.74 (95% CI 1.90-11.85). Conclusions: GIV IHC expression status has been found to be associated with T3 disease, pMMR, and DRFS in an initial cohort of stage II CC. This exploratory diagnostic algorithm currently undergoes validation in two independent clinical stage II CC cohorts, with promising preliminary data. Disclosure: P. Waring: received research grant funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche; B. Lafleur, A. Muranyi, S. Singh and P. Brunhoeber: Employee of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a member of the Roche Group; S. Hu, V. Teichgraber, U. Rohr, R. Ridder:. and K. Shanmugam: Employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

HOX, PBX, and MEIS transcription factors bind DNA through a homeodomain. PBX proteins bind DNA cooperatively as heterodimers with MEIS family members and also with HOX proteins from paralog groups 1 to 10. MEIS proteins cooperatively bind DNA with ABD-B class HOX proteins of groups 9 and 10. Here, we examine aspects of dimeric and higher-order interactions between these three homeodomain classes. The most significant results can be summarized as follows. (i) Most of PBX N terminal to the homeodomain is required for efficient cooperative binding with HOXD4 and HOXD9. (ii) MEIS and PBX proteins form higher-order complexes on a heterodimeric binding site. (iii) Although MEIS does not cooperatively bind DNA with ANTP class HOX proteins, it does form a trimer as a non-DNA-binding partner with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD4. (iv) The N terminus of HOXD4 negatively regulates trimer formation. (v) MEIS forms a similar trimer with DNA-bound PBX-HOXD9. (vi) A related trimer (where MEIS is a non-DNA-binding partner) is formed on a transcriptional promoter within the cell. (vii) We observe an additional trimer class involving non-DNA-bound PBX and DNA-bound MEIS-HOXD9 or MEIS-HOXD10 heterodimers that is enhanced by mutation of the PBX homeodomain. (viii) In this latter trimer, PBX is likely to contact both MEIS and HOXD9/D10. (ix) The stability of DNA binding by all trimers is enhanced relative to the heterodimers. These findings suggest novel functions for PBX and MEIS in modulating the function of DNA-bound MEIS-HOX and PBX-HOX heterodimers, respectively.

3576 Background: BRAF encodes a serine-threonine kinase that is a downstream effector of activated RAS. A point mutation (V600E) in BRAF occurs in a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and is associated with adverse outcome and may predict non response to anti-EGFR antibodies. Detection of a BRAFV600E mutation in a CRC with microsatellite instability indicates a sporadic origin and excludes Lynch Syndrome. While BRAFV600E mutation status is determined using a DNA-based assay, antibodies against the BRAFV600E protein have recently been developed. We examined mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with mutation status. Methods: Primary stage III colon carcinomas (50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild-type cases) were studied from a completed phase III adjuvant trial comparing FOLFOX +/- cetuximab (NCCTG N0147). In archival resection specimens, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using a pan-BRAF antibody and a V600E mutation-specific antibody raised against an immunogenic synthetic peptide derived from the internal region of the BRAFV600E protein. BRAFV600E mutations in codon 15 were analyzed in extracted DNA using a multiplex, allele specific PCR–based assay. BRAF staining was scored independently by two pathologists blinded to mutation status. Results: In primary colon carcinomas stained with a pan-BRAF antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining for BRAF proteins was detected in 74 of 75 carcinomas with one case deemed non-evaluable. Using the mutation-specific BRAFV600E antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining was detected in 49 of 74 tumors without appreciable heterogeneity of expression. Among these 49 tumors expressing mutant BRAFV600E proteins, all (100%) were found to carry a BRAFV600E mutation according to a DNA-based assay. In contrast, absent BRAFV600E staining was observed in all 25 tumors that were found to have wild-type copies of BRAFV600E detected using a PCR-based assay. Conclusions: For the detection of mutant BRAFV600E, complete concordance was found between IHC and a DNA-based method in colon carcinomas. This finding supports the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen CRCs for mutant BRAFV600E proteins in routine clinical practice to inform clinical decision-making.

Background The BRAF V600E mutation is a well-validated negative prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and is a highly attractive drug target. Barriers to the development of agents targeting BRAF V600E in mCRC are the low rate of mutations (approximately 10%) and reliance on to sequencing-based technologies, which are not routinely available outside of large cancer centres. A simple immunohistochemistry (IHC) test, more suited to routine pathology practice, would provide much broader access to patient (pt) identification, and would also enable studies of tumor heterogeneity. Aims: To validate an IHC-based method of detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in a large cohort of community-based CRC patients. Methods Tissue microarrays, comprising matched normal and tumor paraffin embedded tissue samples obtained from colectomy specimens from a community cohort of 505 pts with stage I–IV CRC, were tested with 2 antibodies (Ab): pBR for total BRAF and VE1 for BRAF V600E, using the Ventana UltraView and OptiView kits, respectively. IHC was assessed independently by 2 blinded pathologists, and results compared to BRAF V600E status determined by Sanger sequencing (SS). pBR negative samples were considered non - evaluable. Nine discordant cases were re-tested with a BRAF V600E SNaPshot assay. Results Demographic features were evenly matched. SS was evaluable in 504/505; IHC in 477/505; with both evaluable in 476/505 pts. 56/476 (11.8%) pts had V600E mutations detected by SS, 65/476 (13.7%) by IHC. The positive predictive value was 84.6% (55/65). 1 pt was negative by IHC and positive on SS and SNaPshot; resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.8% (410/411 cases). There was 100% concordance between SS and SNaPshot. Further validation is ongoing, and outcome data will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions We have conducted a comprehensive analytical and clinical validation and feasibility analysis of an IHC-based method to detect the BRAF V600E mutation in a large community-based population of pts with CRC. Shown to be highly sensitive, we are planning to adopt this approach as our initial screening step in an upcoming prospective combination trial targeting BRAF V600E in pts with mCRC. Disclosure J. Desai: Research Support: Roche, Ventana Medical Systems, A. Muranyi: Employee: Ventana Medical Systems, K. Shanmugam: Employee and Shareholder, Ventana Medical Systems, T. Grogan: Shareholder and Chief Scientific Officer, Ventana Medical Systems, P. Gibbs: Research Support, Ventana Medical Systems, P. Waring: Research Support: Ventana Medical Systems, All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) V600E mutation is a well-established biomarker for poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is a highly attractive drug target. A barrier to the development of new therapies targeting BRAF V600E in mCRC is the low prevalence of mutations (approximately 10 %) and the current need for access to sequencing-based technologies which are not routinely available outside of large cancer centres. Availability of a standardised immunohistochemistry (IHC) test, more suited to routine pathology practice, would provide much broader access to patient identification. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of a recently developed BRAF V600E IHC method as a prognostic biomarker in a large cohort of community-based CRC patients. Archival tumour samples from 505 patients with stage I-IV CRC were immunohistochemically tested with two antibodies, pBR1 for total BRAF and VE1 for BRAF V600E. Cases were assessed by two blinded pathologists, and results were compared to BRAF V600E mutation status determined using DNA sequencing. Discordant cases were retested with a BRAF V600E SNaPshot assay. BRAF mutation status was correlated with overall survival (OS) in stage IV CRC. By DNA sequencing and IHC, 505 and 477 patients were respectively evaluable. Out of 477 patients, 56 (11. 7 %) had BRAF V600E mutations detected by sequencing and 63 (13.2 %) by IHC. Using DNA sequencing results as the reference, sensitivity and specificity for IHC were 98.2 % (55/56) and 98.1 % (413/421), respectively. IHC had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.3 % (55/63) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8 % (413/414). Compared to DNA sequencing plus retesting of available discordant cases by SNaPshot assay, IHC using the VE1 antibody had a 100 % sensitivity (59/59), specificity (416/416), NPV (416/416) and PPV (59/59). Stage IV CRC patients with BRAF V600E protein detected by IHC exhibited a significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.20, 95 % CI 1.26-3.83, p = 0.005), consistent with other published series. Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E VE1 antibody is an accurate diagnostic assay in CRC. The test provides a simple, clinically applicable method of testing for the BRAF V600E mutation in routine practice.