Search

The aims of this work were to measure the accuracy of one continuous speech recognition product and dependence on the speaker's gender and status as a native or nonnative English speaker, and evaluate the product's potential for routine use in transcribing radiology reports. IBM MedSpeak/Radiology software, version 1.1 was evaluated by 6 speakers. Two were nonnative English speakers, and 3 were men. Each speaker dictated a set of 12 reports. The reports included neurologic and body imaging examinations performed with 6 different modalities. The dictated and original report texts were compared, and error rates for overall, significant, and subtle significant errors were computed. Error rate dependence on modality, native English speaker status, and gender were evaluated by performing ttests. The overall error rate was 10.3 +/- 3.3%. No difference in accuracy between men and women was found; however, significant differences were seen for overall and significant errors when comparing native and nonnative English speakers (P = .009 and P = .008, respectively). The speech recognition software is approximately 90% accurate, and while practical implementation issues (rather than accuracy) currently limit routine use of this product throughout a radiology practice, application in niche areas such as the emergency room currently is being pursued. This methodology provides a convenient way to compare the initial accuracy of different speech recognition products, and changes in accuracy over time, in a detailed and sensitive manner. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND. Iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques are susceptible to contrast-dependent spatial resolution, limiting overall radiation dose reduction potential. Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) may mitigate this limitation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate low-contrast detectability performance and radiation-saving potential of a DLIR algorithm in comparison with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR using a human multireader noninferiority study design and task-based observer modeling. METHODS. A dual-phantom construct, consisting of a low-contrast detectability module (21 low-contrast hypoattenuating objects in seven sizes [2.4-10.0 mm] and three contrast levels [-15, -10, -5 HU] embedded within liver-equivalent background) and a phantom, was imaged at five radiation exposures (CTDI vol range, 1.4-14.0 mGy; size-specific dose estimate, 2.5-25.0 mGy; 90%-, 70%-, 50%-, and 30%-reduced radiation levels and full radiation level) using an MDCT scanner. Images were reconstructed using FBP, hybrid IR (ASiR-V), and DLIR (TrueFidelity). Twenty-four readers of varying experience levels evaluated images using a two-alternative forced choice. A task-based observer model (detectability index [ d' ]) was calculated. Reader performance was estimated by calculating the AUC using a noninferiority method. RESULTS. Compared with FBP and IR methods at routine radiation levels, DLIR medium and DLIR high settings showed noninferior performance through a 90% radiation reduction (except DLIR medium setting at 70% reduced level). The IR method was non-inferior to routine radiation FBP only for 30% and 50% radiation reductions. No significant difference in d' was observed between routine radiation FBP and DLIR high setting through a 70% radiation reduction. Reader experience was not correlated with diagnostic accuracy ( R 2 = 0.005). CONCLUSION. Compared with FBP or IR methods at routine radiation levels, certain DLIR algorithm weightings yielded noninferior low-contrast detectability with radiation reductions of up to 90% as measured by 24 human readers and up to 70% as assessed by a task-based observer model. CLINICAL IMPACT. DLIR has substantial potential to preserve contrast-dependent spatial resolution for the detection of hypoattenuating lesions at decreased radiation levels in a phantom model, addressing a major shortcoming of current IR techniques.

Objective: To convene a multi-disciplinary panel to develop a pathway for Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected nephrolithiasis and then prospectively evaluate its effect on patient care., Materials and Methods: The STONE Pathway was developed and linked to order sets within our Electronic Health Record in April 2019. Records were prospectively reviewed for ED patients who underwent ultrasound or Computerized Tomography (CT) to evaluate suspected nephrolithiasis between January 2019 and August 2019 within our institution. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients whose ED CT was low dose (<4 mSv). Secondary outcome measures included receipt of pathway-concordant pain medications and urine strainers. Order set utilization was evaluated as a process measure. Balance measures assessed included repeat ED visits, imaging, hospitalizations, and a urologic clinic visit or surgery within 30 days of discharge., Results: 441 patients underwent ED imaging, of whom 261 (59%) were evaluated for suspected nephrolithiasis. The STONE Pathway was used in 50 (30%) eligible patients. Patients treated with the Pathway were more likely to undergo low-dose CTs (49% vs 23%, P <.001), and receive guideline-concordant pain medications such as NSAIDs (90% vs 62%, P <.001), and were less likely to return to the ED within 30 days (13% vs 2%, P = .01). These measures demonstrated special cause variation following Pathway release., Conclusion: Clinical pathways increase compliance with evidence-based practices for pain control and imaging in nephrolithiasis emergency care and may improve the delivery of value-based care., Competing Interests: DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST Please copy this Conflict-of-Interest form and paste into your word processing software, type in each author and either indicate "no conflict" or specify any conflicts; it will be required that you submit the completed form (with all authors indicated) with the revised manuscript. Please list only conflicts of interest specific to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) were developed for the 10 most commonly performed pediatric CT examinations in the United States using the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry. Purpose To develop robust, current, national DRLs and ADs for the 10 most commonly performed pediatric CT examinations as a function of patient age and size. Materials and Methods Data on 10 pediatric (ie, patients aged 18 years and younger) CT examinations performed between 2016 and 2020 at 1625 facilities were analyzed. For head and neck examinations, dose indexes were analyzed based on patient age; for body examinations, dose indexes were analyzed for patient age and effective diameter. Data from 1 543 535 examinations provided medians for AD and 75th percentiles for DRLs for volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ), dose-length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Results Of all facilities analyzed, 66% of the facilities (1068 of 1625) were community hospitals, 16% (264 of 1625) were freestanding centers, 9.5% (154 of 1625) were academic facilities, and 3.5% (57 of 1625) were dedicated children's hospitals. Fifty-two percent of the patients (798 577 of 1 543 535) were boys, and 48% (744 958 of 1 543 535) were girls. The median age of patients was 14 years (boys, 13 years; girls, 15 years). The head was the most frequent anatomy examined with CT (876 655 of 1 543 535 examinations [57%]). For head without contrast material CT examinations, the age-based CTDI vol AD ranged from 19 to 46 mGy, and DRL ranged from 23 to 55 mGy, with both AD and DRL increasing with age. For body examinations, DRLs and ADs for size-based CTDI vol , SSDE, and DLP increased consistently with the patient's effective diameter. Conclusion Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses as a function of patient age and effective diameter were developed for the 10 most commonly performed CT pediatric examinations using American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry data. These benchmarks can guide CT facilities in adjusting pediatric CT protocols and resultant doses for their patients. © RSNA, 2021 An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on October 29, 2021.

OBJECTIVE. To reduce staff exposure to infection and maintain operational efficiency, we have developed a protocol to image patients using portable chest radiography through the glass of an isolation room. This technique is safe and easy to implement. Images are of comparable quality to standard portable radiographs. CONCLUSION. This protocol, used routinely by our department during the COVID-19 pandemic, can be applied to any situation in which the patient is placed in isolation.

The past decade has seen the increasing integration of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging into radiation therapy (RT). This growth can be contributed to multiple factors, including hardware and software advances that have allowed the acquisition of high-resolution volumetric data of RT patients in their treatment position (also known as MR simulation) and the development of methods to image and quantify tissue function and response to therapy. More recently, the advent of MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) - achieved through the integration of MR imaging systems and linear accelerators - has further accelerated this trend. As MR imaging in RT techniques and technologies, such as MRgRT, gain regulatory approval worldwide, these systems will begin to propagate beyond tertiary care academic medical centers and into more community-based health systems and hospitals, creating new opportunities to provide advanced treatment options to a broader patient population. Accompanying these opportunities are unique challenges related to their adaptation, adoption, and use including modification of hardware and software to meet the unique and distinct demands of MR imaging in RT, the need for standardization of imaging techniques and protocols, education of the broader RT community (particularly in regards to MR safety) as well as the need to continue and support research, and development in this space. In response to this, an ad hoc committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) was formed to identify the unmet needs, roadblocks, and opportunities within this space. The purpose of this document is to report on the major findings and recommendations identified. Importantly, the provided recommendations represent the consensus opinions of the committee's membership, which were submitted in the committee's report to the AAPM Board of Directors. In addition, AAPM ad hoc committee reports differ from AAPM task group reports in that ad hoc committee reports are neither reviewed nor ultimately approved by the committee's parent groups, including at the council and executive committee level. Thus, the recommendations given in this summary should not be construed as being endorsed by or official recommendations from the AAPM., (© 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: To quantify and categorize fluoroscopically-guided procedures with radiation doses exceeding 5000 mGy reference point air kerma (K a,r ). K a,r  > 5000 mGy has been defined as a "significant radiation dose" by the Society of Interventional Radiology. Identification and analysis of interventions with high radiation doses has the potential to reduce radiation-induced injuries., Materials and Methods: Radiation dose data from a dose monitoring system for 19 interventional suites and 89,549 consecutive patient encounters from January 1, 2013 to August 1, 2019 at a single academic institution were reviewed. All patient encounters with K a,r  > 5000 mGy were included. All other encounters were excluded (n = 89,289). Patient demographics, medical specialty, intervention type, fluoroscopy time (minutes), dose area product (mGy·cm 2 ), and K a,r (mGy) were evaluated., Results: There were 260 (0.3%) fluoroscopically-guided procedures with K a,r  > 5000 mGy. Of the 260 procedures which exceeded 5000 mGy, neurosurgery performed 81 (30.5%) procedures, followed by interventional radiology (n = 75; 28.2%), neurointerventional radiology (n = 55; 20.7%), and vascular surgery (n = 49; 18.4%). The procedures associated with the highest K a,r were venous stent reconstruction performed by interventional radiology, arteriovenous malformation embolization performed by neurointerventional radiology, spinal hardware fixation by neurosurgery, and arterial interventions performed by vascular surgery. Neurointerventional radiology had the highest mean K a,r (7,799 mGy), followed by neurosurgery (7452 mGy), vascular surgery (6849 mGy), and interventional radiology (6109 mGy). The mean K a,r for interventional radiology performed procedures exceeding 5000 mGy was significantly lower than that for neurointerventional radiology, neurosurgery, and vascular surgery., Conclusions: Fluoroscopically-guided procedures with radiation dose exceeding 5000 mGy reference point air kerma are uncommon. The results of this study demonstrate that a large proportion of cases exceeding 5000 mGy were performed by non-radiologists, who likely do not receive the same training in radiation physics, radiation biology, and dose reduction techniques as radiologists.

Rationale and Objectives: To assess the implementation of radiation dose monitoring software, create a process for clinical follow-up and documentation of high-dose cases, and quantify the number of patient reported radiation-induced tissue reactions in fluoroscopically guided interventional radiology (IR) and neuro-interventional radiology (NIR) procedures., Materials and Methods: Web-based radiation dose monitoring software was installed at our institution and a process to flag all procedures with reference point air kerma (K a,r ) > 5000 mGy was implemented. The entrance skin dose was estimated and formal reports generated, allowing for physician-initiated clinical follow-up. To evaluate our process, we reviewed all IR and NIR procedures performed at our hospital over a 1-year period. For all procedures with K a,r > 5000 mGy, retrospective medical chart review was performed to evaluate for patient reported tissue reactions., Results: Three thousand five hundred eighty-two procedures were performed over the 1-year period. The software successfully transferred dose data on 3363 (93.9%) procedures. One thousand three hundred ninety-three (368 IR and 1025 NIR) procedures were further analyzed after excluding 2189 IR procedures with K a,r < 2000 mGy. Ten of 368 (2.7%) IR and 52 of 1025 (5.1%) NIR procedures exceeded estimated skin doses of 5000 mGy. All 10 IR cases were abdominal/pelvic trauma angiograms with/without embolization; there were no reported tissue reactions. Of 52 NIR cases, 49 were interventions and 3 were diagnostic angiograms. Five of 49 (10.2%) NIR patients reported skin/hair injuries, all of which were temporary., Conclusion: Software monitoring and documentation of radiation dose in interventional procedures can be successfully implemented. Radiation-induced tissue reactions are relatively uncommon., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

MRI is a ubiquitous medical imaging technology typically using superconductivity to generate a strong, homogeneous, and generally ceaseless magnetic field. MRI and its magnetic field pose many safety hazards, including magnetic forces on metals, tissue heating and burns, nerve stimulation, bioeffects, acoustic noise, and contrast agent complications. The primary concern is that a wide variety of patients, staff members, technologists, and physicians can approach the incessant magnetic field, creating great potential for accidents that could occur if metals from the environment, adornments, implants, and other unintended sources are also present in or near the field. Many accidents have occurred and are occasionally reported in the United States and countries all over the world. Through carefully structured oversight and the establishment of strict guidelines regarding access, responsibilities, and training, these risks can be mitigated, and accidents can be prevented. Fortunately, there is currently a wide variety of resources available to facilitate the successful implementation of an effective MRI safety program. This article presents a general overview of and the authors' experience with an MRI safety program in terms of risk management and training. The MR safety program requirements and regulations in the United States devised by The Joint Commission and the ACR are also discussed. With these resources and a carefully selected team, the risk for MRI-related accidents can be vastly reduced if not completely eliminated., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose To investigate performance in detectability of small (≤1 cm) low-contrast hypoattenuating focal lesions by using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms from two major CT vendors across a range of 11 radiation exposures. Materials and Methods A low-contrast detectability phantom consisting of 21 low-contrast hypoattenuating focal objects (seven sizes between 2.4 and 10.0 mm, three contrast levels) embedded into a liver-equivalent background was scanned at 11 radiation exposures (volume CT dose index range, 0.5-18.0 mGy; size-specific dose estimate [SSDE] range, 0.8-30.6 mGy) with four high-end CT platforms. Data sets were reconstructed by using FBP and varied strengths of image-based, model-based, and hybrid IRs. Sixteen observers evaluated all data sets for lesion detectability by using a two-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. Diagnostic performances were evaluated by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and by performing noninferiority analyses. Results At benchmark exposure, FBP yielded a mean AUC of 0.79 ± 0.09 (standard deviation) across all platforms which, on average, was approximately 2% lower than that observed with the different IR algorithms, which showed an average AUC of 0.81 ± 0.09 (P = .12). Radiation decreases of 30%, 50%, and 80% resulted in similar declines of observer detectability with FBP (mean AUC decrease, -0.02 ± 0.05, -0.03 ± 0.05, and -0.05 ± 0.05, respectively) and all IR methods investigated (mean AUC decrease, -0.00 ± 0.05, -0.04 ± 0.05, and -0.04 ± 0.05, respectively). For each radiation level and CT platform, variance in performance across observers was greater than that across reconstruction algorithms (P = .03). Conclusion Iterative reconstruction algorithms have limited radiation optimization potential in detectability of small low-contrast hypoattenuating focal lesions. This task may be further complicated by a high degree of variation in radiologists' performances, seemingly exceeding real performance differences among reconstruction algorithms. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Purpose: To compare technical success, clinical success, complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time for osteoid osteoma thermal (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with two-axis fluoroscopic navigational overlay versus conventional computed tomography (CT) guidance., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all osteoid osteoma ablations performed over a 5.5-year period at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. Twenty-five ablations (15 radiofrequency and 10 microwave) in 23 patients undergoing fluoroscopic CBCT-guided osteoid osteoma ablation were compared to 35 ablations (35 radiofrequency) in 32 patients undergoing ablation via conventional CT guidance. Dose area product and dose length product were recorded for CBCT and conventional CT, respectively, and converted to effective doses. Technical success, clinical success (cessation of pain and medication use 1 month after ablation), complications, radiation dose, and total room utilization time were compared., Results: All procedures were technically successful. Twenty-two of 25 (88.0%) CBCT and 31 of 35 (88.6%) conventional CT-guided ablations achieved immediate clinical success. There were two minor complications in each group and no major complications. Mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower for CBCT compared to CT guidance (0.12 vs. 0.39 mSv, p = 0.02). Mean total room utilization time for CBCT was longer (133.5 vs. 97.5 min, p = 0.0001)., Conclusions: Fluoroscopic CBCT guidance for percutaneous osteoid osteoma ablation yields similar technical and clinical success, reduced radiation dose, and increased total room utilization time compared to conventional CT guidance.

Purpose To develop diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) for the 10 most common adult computed tomographic (CT) examinations in the United States as a function of patient size by using the CT Dose Index Registry. Materials and Methods Data from the 10 most commonly performed adult CT head, neck, and body examinations from 583 facilities were analyzed. For head examinations, the lateral thickness was used as an indicator of patient size; for neck and body examinations, water-equivalent diameter was used. Data from 1 310 727 examinations (analyzed by using SAS 9.3) provided median values, as well as means and 25th and 75th (DRL) percentiles for volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ), dose-length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Applicable results were compared with DRLs from eight countries. Results More than 46% of the facilities were community hospitals; 13% were academic facilities. More than 48% were in metropolitan areas, 39% were suburban, and 13% were rural. More than 50% of the facilities performed fewer than 500 examinations per month. The abdomen and pelvis was the most frequently performed examination in the study (45%). For body examinations, DRLs (75th percentile) and ADs (median) for CTDI vol , SSDE, and DLP increased consistently with the patient's size (water-equivalent diameter). The relationships between patient size and DRLs and ADs were not as strong for head and neck examinations. These results agree well with the data from other countries. Conclusion DRLs and ADs as a function of patient size were developed for the 10 most common adult CT examinations performed in the United States. © RSNA, 2017.

Purpose: This study aims to compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning on 16 cm wide-detector computed tomography (CT) to TAVR planning on 4 cm detector CT., Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients who had TAVR planning axial CT on a wide-detector scanner (protocol 1) were compared to 36 patients who had helical 4 cm detector CT (protocol 2)., Results: Vascular attenuation was greater for protocol 1, but image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio were the same. Radiation dose was lower and iodine dose was less for protocol 1., Conclusion: Protocol 1 had greater vascular attenuation and similar image quality but lower radiation and less iodine compared to protocol 2., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use of the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry data with a novel measurement of exposure to guide quality improvement efforts., Materials and Methods: Using information from the Dose Index Registry report covering July through December 2012, we examined our relative ranking compared with the national median CT dose for the 20 most frequently performed examinations at our institution. The total exposure variance, defined as the difference between institutional and median national dose multiplied by the local examination frequency and expressed in units of mGy-persons, was calculated. Using this metric, two examinations were selected for investigation: pulmonary and thoracic CT angiography (CTA). Protocol modifications were implemented, and postintervention dose data were assessed from the report 1 year later., Results: As indicated by size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs), the 2012 pulmonary CTA was within the national interquartile range; however, total exposure variance analysis showed that it presented the greatest opportunity for improvement on a population basis. Thoracic CTA was a top quartile examination and offered the second highest potential savings. After protocol modification, the average pulmonary CTA SSDEs decreased by 16%, for a population exposure savings of 1776 mGy-persons in the 2013 report. Average thoracic CTA SSDEs decreased by 44%, for a population exposure savings of 1050 mGy-persons., Conclusion: Total exposure variance analysis can increase the usefulness of Dose Index Registry data by relating per-examination dose differences to the local examination frequency. This study exhibited reduction of dose metrics for two commonly performed examinations.

Aim: To assess the effect of trauma backboards on the radiation dose at computed tomography (CT) when using automatic tube current modulation (ATCM)., Materials and Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with two commercially available CT systems (GE LightSpeed16 Pro and Siemens Definition AS+) without and with backboards. Tube current-time product (mAs), and CTDIvol (mGy) were recorded for each examination. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure skin entrance dose in the pelvis and breast. Statistical significance was determined using a two-sample t-test. In addition, an institutional review board-approved retrospective image review was performed to quantify the frequency of backboard use during CT in the emergency department., Results: There was a statistically significant increase in maximum tube current-time product (p<0.05) and CTDIvol (p<0.05) with the presence of a backboard; tube current-time product increased up to 31% and CTDIvol increased up to 27%. There was a significant increase in skin entrance dose in the anterior and posterior pelvis (p<0.05) with the presence of a backboard; skin entrance dose increased up to 25% in the anterior pelvis. Skin entrance dose to the breast increased with a backboard, although this was not statistically significant. The frequency of backboard use during CT markedly decreased (from 77% to 3%) after instituting a multidisciplinary policy to promptly remove patients from backboards upon arrival to the emergency department after a primary clinical survey., Conclusions: Using backboards during CT with ATCM can significantly increase the radiation dose. Although the decision to maintain patients on backboards is multifactorial, attempts should be made to minimise backboard use during CT when possible., (Copyright © 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective was to evaluate variation in the current estimated radiation dose index for pediatric cervical spine (c-spine) computed tomography (CT) examinations., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of pediatric (age younger than 19 years) c-spine CT examinations from the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry, July 2011 through December 2014. We used the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) as the radiation dose estimate and used summary statistics to describe patient and hospital characteristics., Results: There were 12,218 pediatric CT c-spine examinations performed across 296 participating hospitals. Fifty-six percent were in male patients, and 79% were in children older than 10 years. Most hospitals (55%) were community hospitals without trauma designations, and the largest proportion of examinations (41%) were performed at these hospitals. The median CTDIvol was 15 mGy (interquartile range = 9 to 23 mGy) representing a more than 2.5-fold difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles. Pediatric hospitals (both trauma and nontrauma centers) delivered the lowest CTDIvol across all age groups and showed the least amount of variability in dose., Conclusions: There is significant variation in the radiation dose index for pediatric c-spine CT examinations. Pediatric hospitals practice at lower CT dose estimates than other hospitals. Individual hospitals should examine their practices in an effort to ensure standardization and optimization of CT parameters to minimize radiation exposures to pediatric patients., (© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Background and Aims: Complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal hemorrhage and ascites, are associated with significant increases in both mortality and complications during pregnancy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for treating portal hypertension, but the safety of TIPS during pregnancy is largely unknown. In this series, we review five patients who underwent TIPS placement while pregnant and describe their clinical outcomes., Methods: Five pregnant patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension underwent elective TIPS for complications of portal hypertension (four for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding and one for refractory ascites). Outcomes measured were recurrent bleeding episodes or need for further paracenteses during pregnancy, estimated radiation dose to the fetus and gestational age at delivery. All patients were followed after delivery to evaluate technical and clinical success of the procedure., Results: All five patients survived pregnancy and went on to deliver successfully. When TIPS was performed for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding (n = 4), no patients demonstrated variceal bleeding after TIPS placement. When TIPS was performed for refractory ascites (n = 1), no further paracenteses were required. All patients delivered successfully, albeit prematurely. Average radiation dose estimated to the fetus was 16.3 mGy., Conclusions: This series suggests that TIPS can be performed in selective pregnant patients with portal hypertension, with little added risk to the mother or fetus.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to examine the variation in radiation dose, CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) for pediatric head CT examinations as a function of hospital characteristics across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A survey inquiring about hospital information, CT scanners, pediatric head examination protocol, CTDIvol, and DLP was mailed to a representative sample of U.S. hospitals. Follow-up mailings were sent to nonrespondents. Descriptive characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents were compared using design-based Pearson chi-square tests. Dose estimates were compared across hospital characteristics using Bonferroni-adjusted Wald test. Hospital-level factors associated with dose estimates were evaluated using multiple linear regressions and modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS. Surveys were sent out to 751 hospitals; 292 responded to the survey, of which 253 were eligible (35.5% response rate, calculated as number of hospitals who completed surveys [n = 253] divided by sum of number who were eligible and initially consented [n = 712] plus estimated number who were eligible among those who refused [n = 1]). Most respondents reported using MDCT scanners (99.2%) and having a dedicated pediatric head CT protocol (93%). Estimated mean reported CTDIvol values were 27.3 mGy (95% CI, 24.4-30.1 mGy), and DLP values were 390.9 mGy × cm (95% CI, 346.6-435.1 mGy × cm). These values did not vary significantly by region, trauma level, teaching status, CT accreditation, number of CT scanners, or report of a dedicated pediatric CT protocol. However, estimated CTDIvol reported by children's hospitals was 19% lower than that reported by general hospitals (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Most hospitals (82%) report doses that meet American College of Radiology accreditation levels. However, [corrected] the mean CTDI(vol) at children's hospitals was approximately 7 mGy (21%, adjusted for covariates), lower than that at nonchildren's hospitals.

Purpose: To investigate whether reduced radiation dose liver computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction ( MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction ) might compromise depiction of clinically relevant findings or might have decreased image quality when compared with clinical standard radiation dose CT images reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ( ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction )., Materials and Methods: With institutional review board approval, informed consent, and HIPAA compliance, 50 patients (39 men, 11 women) were prospectively included who underwent liver CT. After a portal venous pass with ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction images, a 60% reduced radiation dose pass was added with MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction images. One reviewer scored ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction image quality and marked findings. Two additional independent reviewers noted whether marked findings were present on MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction images and assigned scores for relative conspicuity, spatial resolution, image noise, and image quality. Liver and aorta Hounsfield units and image noise were measured. Volume CT dose index and size-specific dose estimate ( SSDE size-specific dose estimate ) were recorded. Qualitative reviewer scores were summarized. Formal statistical inference for signal-to-noise ratio ( SNR signal-to-noise ratio ), contrast-to-noise ratio ( CNR contrast-to-noise ratio ), volume CT dose index, and SSDE size-specific dose estimate was made (paired t tests), with Bonferroni adjustment., Results: Two independent reviewers identified all 136 ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction image findings (n = 272) on MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction images, scoring them as equal or better for conspicuity, spatial resolution, and image noise in 94.1% (256 of 272), 96.7% (263 of 272), and 99.3% (270 of 272), respectively. In 50 image sets, two reviewers (n = 100) scored overall image quality as sufficient or good with MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction in 99% (99 of 100). Liver SNR signal-to-noise ratio was significantly greater for MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction (10.8 ± 2.5 [standard deviation] vs 7.7 ± 1.4, P < .001); there was no difference for CNR contrast-to-noise ratio (2.5 ± 1.4 vs 2.4 ± 1.4, P = .45). For ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction , respectively, volume CT dose index was 15.2 mGy ± 7.6 versus 6.2 mGy ± 3.6; SSDE size-specific dose estimate was 16.4 mGy ± 6.6 versus 6.7 mGy ± 3.1 (P < .001)., Conclusion: Liver CT images reconstructed with MBIR model-based iterative reconstruction may allow up to 59% radiation dose reduction compared with the dose with ASIR adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction , without compromising depiction of findings or image quality., (© RSNA, 2014.)

Rationale and Objectives: To determine the impact of incremental increases in computed tomography (CT) image noise on detection of low-contrast hypodense liver lesions., Material and Methods: We studied 50 CT examinations acquired at image noise index (NI) of 15 and hypodense liver lesions and 50 examinations with no lesions. Validation of a noise addition tool to be used in the evaluation of the CT examinations was performed with a liver phantom. Using this tool, three 100-image sets were assembled: an NI of 17.4 (simulating 75% of the original patient radiation dose), 21.2 (simulating 50% dose), and 29.7 (simulating 25%). Three readers scored certainty of lesion presence using a five-point Likert scale., Results: For original images (NI 15) plus images with NI of 17.4 and 21.2, sensitivity was >90% threshold (range, 95%-98%). For images with NI of 29.7, sensitivity was just below the threshold (89%). Reader Az values for receiver operating characteristic curves were good for original, NI 17.4, and NI 21.2 images (0.976, 0.973, and 0.96, respectively). For NI of 29.7, the Az decreased to 0.913. Detection sensitivity was <90% for both lesion size < 10 mm (85%) and lesion-to-liver contrast <60 Hounsfield units (85%) only at NI 29.7., Conclusions: For low-contrast lesion detection in liver CT, image noise can be increased up to NI 21.2 (a 50% patient radiation dose reduction) without substantial reduction in sensitivity., (Copyright © 2014 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The displayed air kerma during a fluoroscopy-guided procedure often does not represent the entrance skin dose. The purpose of this work is to develop a system-specific air kerma-to-entrance skin dose look-up table (LUT) for immediate reference and to evaluate its clinical utility., Materials and Methods: Physicists are often involved in retrospective dosimetry and risk estimates. Conservative dosimetry conversion factors, represented by the total conversion factor, prospectively estimate the maximum potential skin dose from the displayed air kerma. Air kerma-to-skin dose LUTs with corresponding tissue reactions and approximate time-of-onset can be posted for reference. By developing skin dose LUTs, physicians can actively evaluate during the procedure the potential for deterministic skin reactions. System user surveys evaluated the impact of LUTs on dose awareness., Results: The range of the total conversion factor to the displayed air kerma for the nine systems evaluated was 0.8-1.6 for frontal x-ray tubes. Skin dose LUTs were posted in all imaging suites, and two surveys reported user feedback. Radiology technologists indicated that LUTs improved user dose awareness. Twelve of 14 physician respondents indicated an understanding that entrance skin dose is not equal to the displayed air kerma., Conclusion: Our efforts focused on educating fluoroscopy users about differences between displayed air kerma and the entrance skin dose while increasing dose awareness using an accessible and easy-to-understand tool. Skin dose LUTs provide physicians and staff an immediate reference for the maximum estimated entrance skin dose and the associated deterministic skin effects, allowing appropriate patient management.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of use of dual-energy CT monochromatic imaging in the late hepatic arterial phase on hyperenhancing focal lesion detection and lesion conspicuity., Subjects and Methods: This prospective study included 72 patients imaged with a single-source dual-energy CT scanner. Late arterial phase imaging was performed with dual energies of 140 and 80 kVp, and the portal venous and delayed phases were performed with a single energy of 120 kVp. Two deidentified image sets were created: set A consisted of 77-keV images only, and set B consisted of 40-, 50-, 70-, and 77-keV images and iodine-based contrast material decomposition images. Two independent reviewers identified hypervascular lesions and subjectively scored lesion conspicuity. Contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated, and radiation dose (volume CT dose index) was recorded., Results: The 128 lesions identified had a mean size of 1.7 ± 1.4 cm. There was no difference in lesion detection between the two reviewers or the two image sets. The contrast-to-noise ratio at 50 keV was 72% greater than that at 77 keV (p < 0.0001). Subjective conspicuity was statistically greatest at 50 keV (p < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in mean volume CT dose index between the dual-energy (12.8 mGy) and the two single-energy (14.4 and 14.2 mGy) phases., Conclusion: Viewing dual-energy CT images may result in the greatest subjective lesion conspicuity and measured contrast-to-noise ratio at 50 keV with equal detection of hyperenhancing liver lesions compared with viewing 77-keV images alone. In addition, the radiation doses of dual-energy CT may be similar to those of single-energy CT.

Objectives: To examine hospital-level factors associated with the use of a dedicated pediatric dose-reduction protocol and protective shielding for head CT in a national sample of hospitals., Methods: A mixed-mode (online and paper) survey was administered to a stratified random sample of US community hospitals (N = 751). Respondents provided information on pediatric head CT scanning practices, including use of a dose-reduction protocol. Modified Poisson regression analyses describe the relative risk (RR) of not reporting the use of a pediatric dose-reduction protocol or protective shielding; multivariable analyses adjust for census region, trauma level, children's hospital status, and bed size., Results: Of hospitals that were contacted, 38 were ineligible (no CT scanner, hospital closed, do not scan infants), 1 refused, and 253 responded (35.5% response rate). Across all hospitals, 92.6% reported using a pediatric dose-reduction protocol. Modified Poisson regression showed that small hospitals (0-50 beds) were 20% less likely to report using a protocol than large hospitals (>150 beds) (RR: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.99; adjusted for covariates). Teaching hospitals were more likely to report using a protocol (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.19; adjusted for covariates). After adjusting for covariates, children's hospitals were significantly less likely to report using protective shielding than nonchildren's hospitals (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56-0.73), though this may be due to more advanced scanner type., Conclusion: Results from this study provide guidance for tailored educational campaigns and quality improvement interventions to increase the adoption of pediatric dose-reduction efforts., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine variation in pediatric trauma head CT imaging protocols in Washington State trauma centers (TCs) in 2012 and compare to a previous survey conducted in 2008-2009., Methods: A mixed-mode (online and paper) survey was sent to all adult and pediatric Washington State TCs (levels 1-5). Respondents provided information about the CT scanner used for pediatric head scans and technical information about pediatric dose reduction protocols. Mean head effective dose and organ dose for a female baby were estimated. Results were compared with previous data., Results: Sixty-one of 76 TCs responded to the 2012 survey (response rate, 80.3%, versus 76% for 2008-2009 survey). In 2012, 91.7% reported having a dedicated pediatric protocol (87.7% in 2008-2009). Protective shielding use ranged from 80% to 100% across both survey years. In 2012, 2.5 times more TCs provided sufficient information to conduct dose calculations than in 2008-2009. Estimated mean CT dose index was 23.1 milliGray (mGy) in 2012, compared with 34.8 mGy in 2008-2009 (P = .01). Estimated mean dose length product was also significantly lower in 2012 than 2008-2009 (307.6 mGy × cm versus 430.1 mGy × cm, respectively; P = .04). Wide variation in mean effective dose was observed for level 3 and 4 TCs in 2012, similar to variation observed in 2008-2009 among level 4 TCs. Mean organ dose was significantly lower in 2012 for eye lens and brain, but higher for thyroid than in 2008-2009 (P < .05)., Conclusions: Although most Washington State TCs employ dose reduction protocols for pediatric head CTs, and some measures were lower in 2012, variation in protocols use and estimated dose continues to exist. More complete responses in 2012 suggest improved understanding of the importance of pediatric dose reduction efforts. Education and institutional protocols are necessary to reduce pediatric radiation dose from head CTs., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Effective and organ specific doses of ionizing radiation during videourodynamics are unknown. We estimated radiation exposure in children undergoing videourodynamics, and identified patient and examination factors that contribute to higher dosing., Materials and Methods: Fluoroscopy data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing videourodynamics. Documented dose metrics were used to calculate entrance skin dose after applying a series of correction factors. Effective doses and organ specific doses (ovaries/testes) were estimated from entrance skin dose using Monte Carlo methods on a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom (ages 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 years). Regression analysis was performed to determine patient and procedural factors associated with higher dosing., Results: A total of 100 children (45% male, mean ± SD age 9.3 ± 5.7 years) were studied. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (73%), anatomical abnormality (14%) and functional/nonneurogenic disorder (13%). Mean fluoroscopy time was 0.17 ± 0.12 minutes. Mean age adjusted entrance skin dose, effective dose, and testis and ovary doses were 2.18 ± 2.00 mGy, 0.07 ± 0.05 mSv, 0.09 ± 0.10 mGy and 0.20 ± 0.13 mGy, respectively. On univariate analysis age, height, weight, body mass index, bladder capacity and fluoroscopy time were associated with effective dose. On multivariate adjusted analysis, body mass index, bladder capacity and fluoroscopy time were independently associated with effective dose., Conclusions: The average effective dose of ionizing radiation from videourodynamics was less compared to voiding cystourethrogram dose reported in the literature. Greater fluoroscopy time, body mass index and bladder capacity are independently associated with higher dosing., (Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate and characterize the association between fluoroscopy radiation dose rate and various patient size metrics during ureteroscopy., Materials and Methods: Fluoroscopy data were collected from 100 patients undergoing ureteroscopy for stone disease. Radiation dose rates were determined from fluoroscopy dose and time. Estimated entrance skin dose was calculated from air kerma (AK) by applying correction factors. Effective dose (ED) was estimated with Monte Carlo-based simulation software. Patient size metrics included body mass index (BMI), anterior-posterior (AP) midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and region of interest (ROI) pixel value magnitude on computed tomography scout. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between AK dose rate and patient size metrics, adjusting for laterality and stone location., Results: Obese patients (>30 kg/m(2)) comprised 46% of the cohort. Mean fluoroscopy time, displayed AK, entrance skin dose, and ED were 4.2 ± 6.0 second, 1.2 ± 2.1 mGy, 1.2 ± 2.2 mGy, and 0.08 ± 0.15 mSv, respectively. Mean AK dose rate and ED dose rates were 0.30 ± 0.23 mGy/second and 0.021 ± 0.016 mSv/second, respectively. Compared with the nonobese category, the highest BMI category (≥35 kg/m(2)) had over a 3-fold higher mean AK rate (0.50 vs 0.16 mGy/second). On univariate and multivariate analysis, BMI, AP midline distance, AP transrenal thickness, and computed tomography scout region of interest pixel value magnitude were each significantly associated with dose rate., Conclusion: Larger patients experience higher radiation dose rates under fluoroscopy. Severely obese patients receive 3-fold higher dose rates compared with nonobese patients. Given the higher incidence of stone disease in obese patients, all attempts should be made to minimize radiation exposure during ureteroscopy., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of radiation-induced complications is increasingly part of the informed consent process for patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. Data guiding these discussions in the era of modern radiation-minimizing equipment is lacking., Objective: To quantify the rates of skin and hair effects at a modern high-volume neurovascular center, and to assess the feasibility of accurately quantifying the risk of future central nervous system (CNS) tumor formation., Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of endovascular procedures performed at our institution in 2008. The entrance skin dose and brain dose were calculated. Patients receiving skin doses >2 Gy were contacted to inquire about skin and hair changes. We reviewed several recent publications from leading radiation physics bodies to evaluate the feasibility of accurately predicting future cancer risk from neurointerventional procedures., Results: Seven hundred two procedures were included in the study. Of the patients receiving >2 Gy, 39.6% reported subacute skin or hair changes following their procedure, of which 30% were permanent. Increasing skin dose was significantly associated with permanent hair loss. We found substantial methodological difficulties in attempting to model the risk of future CNS tumor formation given the gaps in our current understanding of the brain's susceptibility to low-dose ionizing radiation., Conclusion: Radiation exposures exceeding 2 Gy are common in interventional neuroradiology despite modern radiation-minimizing technology. The incidence of side effects approaches 40%, although the majority is self-limiting. Gaps in current models of brain tumor formation after exposure to radiation preclude accurately quantifying the risk of future CNS tumor formation.

A rising conciousness within both the medical community and in the public has been created by the current levels of radiation exposure from increased use of computed tomography. The concern has prompted the need for more data collection and analysis of hospital and imaging center exam doses. This has spurred the American College of Radiology (ACR) to develop the Dose Index Registry (DIR), which will allow participating insitutions to compare the radiation dose from their CT exams to aggregate national CT dose data based on exam type and body part. We outline the steps involved in the process of enrolling in the DIR, the technical requirements, the challenges we encountered, and our solutions to those challenges. A sample of the quaterly report released by the ACR is presented and discussed. Enrolling in the ACR dose registry is a team effort with participation from IT, a site physicist, and a site radiologist. Participation in this registry is a great starting point to initiate a QA process for monitoring CT dose if none has been established at an institution. The ACR has developed an excellent platform for gathering, analyzing, and reporting CT dose data. Even so, each insititutions will have its own unique issues in joining the project.

Objective: The pregnant trauma patient requires imaging tests to diagnose maternal injuries and diagnostic tests to evaluate the viability of her pregnancy. This article will discuss abdominal trauma in pregnancy and the specific role of diagnostic imaging. Radiation concerns in pregnancy will be addressed., Conclusion: Trauma is the leading cause of nonobstetric maternal mortality and a significant cause of fetal loss. Both major and minor trauma result in an increased risk of fetal loss. In major trauma, when there is concern for maternal injury, CT is the mainstay of imaging. The risks of radiation to the pregnancy are small compared with the risk of missed or delayed diagnosis of trauma. In minor trauma, when there is no concern for maternal injury but there is concern about the pregnancy, ultrasound is performed but is insensitive in diagnosing placental abruption. External fetal monitoring is used to dictate patient care.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the upper limit of noise for detection of small low-contrast lesions in a liver phantom., Materials and Methods: A CT liver phantom containing 21 low-contrast, low-attenuation, circular simulated lesions ranging in size from 2.4 to 10 mm was scanned 23 times at different tube current ranges (varying noise index) on a 64-MDCT scanner with automatic tube current modulation. The attenuation of the simulated lesions was 20 HU less than that of the liver-equivalent background. Three radiologists independently reviewed the resultant CT images, which contained either a low-contrast lesion or no lesion and scored certainty of lesion detection using a 4-point Likert scale. Overall performance was evaluated by sensitivity analysis with receiver operator curve and area under the curve (A(z)) computation for ranges of noise index., Results: The reviewers achieved 100% sensitivity with a noise index of 15 or less for lesions measuring 6.3-10.0 mm (A(z) = 0.96). Increasing noise index to the 17-21 range resulted in a minor decrease in sensitivity and overall performance (sensitivity, 92.3%; A(z) = 0.93). A further increase in noise index to the 23-27 range resulted in a moderate decrease in sensitivity (sensitivity, 81.4%; A(z) = 0.77). Beyond the noise index 23-27 range, sensitivity dropped markedly from 81.4% to 39%. Agreement between the three readers in assessing the image sets was moderate., Conclusion: For detection of small low-contrast lesions in the liver phantom model used in this study, the upper limit of noise index may be in the 15-21 range for sensitivity greater than 90%.

Objective: The purpose of this article was to determine the usefulness of multiplanar and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of computed tomographic (CT) data from scans performed for maternal indications for visualizing fetal anatomy and estimating gestational age., Materials and Methods: Eighteen pregnant patients who had abdominopelvic CT scanning performed for maternal indications formed the study group. Two independent reviewers created multiplanar and 3D-reconstructed images of the fetus from these CT scans and analyzed them for fetal anatomy and gestational age. Fetal dose estimates were also obtained., Results: Computed tomographic fetal biometry generally agreed well with ultrasound estimates. Computed tomographic and ultrasound estimates were within 3 to 4 weeks of each other 95% of the time for the 2 reviewers. Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.989 for reviewer 1 and 0.985 for reviewer 2. Fetal anatomic survey revealed that it was easier to see bones and fluid-filled structures such as the stomach and urinary bladder than intracranial, intrathoracic, and intra-abdominal soft tissue structures. Estimated fetal dose was 28.5 (10.7) mGy using the Imaging Performance Assessment of CT Scanner calculator and 23.7 (7.7) mGy when taking maternal perimeter and fetal depth into account with the method of Angel et al., Conclusions: It is technically feasible to produce clinically useful images of the fetus using standard multiplanar reconstructions and 3D algorithms already in place for CT scanning. As CT scans continue to be performed under certain circumstances, particularly the emergency department setting, evaluation of maternal CT scans for potentially useful information about the fetus such as gestational age and gross anatomic survey can be obtained at estimated fetal radiation doses much lower than the actionable level of 150 mGy.

The dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity among children and adults in the United States over the last several decades has brought several new challenges to the delivery of healthcare. The increased utilization of and dependence on imaging for accurate and timely diagnosis has placed the radiology department in a unique position in the provision of care for the obese emergency patient. Radiology practices must be cognizant of the imaging challenges presented by the obese patient and adjust their imaging algorithms accordingly to optimize all types of diagnostic studies. The article systematically reviews common pitfalls and offers methods to improve image quality when using radiography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography to image the obese patient population., (Copyright © RSNA, 2011.)

Purpose: To examine variation in pediatric trauma head CT imaging protocols in Washington state., Methods: A web-based survey was sent to trauma-designated hospitals in Washington state. Respondents were queried about pediatric head trauma volumes, type of CT scanners, and technical information about the CT imaging protocols. Variation in pediatric trauma volumes, CT dose reduction strategies, and effective dose by trauma center levels was examined. Mean head effective dose and organ dose for a female baby were estimated., Results: We achieved a 76% overall response rate. Of the 2,215 children who received head CT scans, 36.3% (n=805) received head CT imaging at level 4 trauma center facilities, followed by level 1 trauma center (31.4%; n=695), level 3 trauma center (19.7%; n=436), level 2 trauma center (12%; n=267), and Level 5 (0.5%; n=12) facilities. Most responding trauma center facilities (44/47) reported having a pediatric specific imaging head CT protocols. However, compared to levels 1 and 2 trauma centers together, a greater proportion of levels 3, 4 & 5 trauma center facilities collectively lacked dose reduction strategies (0% vs. 25-57%), tended to have higher mAs (169 ± 113 vs. 110 ± 36), and were later adopters of dose reduction strategies on the CT scanners. There was more than a 10-fold variation in estimated median effective dose for a baby within level 4 trauma center facilities (3.5 ± 0.84 mSv, range 0.60 to 9.60 mSv)., Discussion: There is both within and between trauma center level variation in pediatric head CT imaging protocols and radiation dose in Washington state., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A recurring source of contention between clinicians and radiologists continues to be examination appropriateness when imaging pregnant patients. With the multitude of references on potential radiation risks to the fetus, radiologists tend to be cautious and hesitant about exposing the fetus to radiation. This tendency is often interpreted by referring physicians as intrusion into and delay in the care of their patients. The risk burden of radiation exposure to the fetus has to be carefully weighed against the benefits of obtaining a critical diagnosis quickly and using a single tailored imaging study. In general, there is lower than expected awareness of radiation risks to the fetus from imaging pregnant patients. Modalities that do not use ionizing radiation, such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, should be the preferred examinations for evaluating an acute condition in a pregnant patient. However, no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration. Exposure to ionizing radiation may be unavoidable, but there is no evidence to suggest that the risk to the fetus after a single imaging study and an interventional procedure is significant. All efforts should be made to minimize the exposure, with consideration of the risk versus benefit for a given clinical scenario.

Rationale and Objectives: We undertook this study to determine whether differences in detector-lesion distance resulted in appreciable effects on digital magnification mammography performance as measured using the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern., Materials and Methods: Images of the standard 42-mm thick standard ACR mammography phantom with a wax insert on one side containing simulated fibers, calcifications, and masses were obtained on a Senographe Essential digital mammography system with the phantom in upright and inverted positions. The process was repeated with a line pair test pattern for measuring resolution. All images were obtained in contact mode, and with 1.5x and 1.8x magnification, and evaluated on a GE PACS monitor., Results: Overall, changing lesion-detector distance using standard versus inverted positioning did not appreciably increase the number of objects seen on the ACR phantom under all modes. No greater than one line pair difference was seen in standard versus inverted positioning. At 1.8x magnification mode, no difference was detected in line pair resolution with a change in positioning., Conclusion: Differences in lesion-detector distance as modeled using both the ACR mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern did not make an appreciable difference in digital magnification mammography performance., (Copyright (c) 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The primary goal of this study was to determine the radiation dose received during diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures in a group of pediatric patients. A second goal was to approximate the total average radiation dose from all angiographic and CT studies that pediatric patients underwent during the study period and to estimate the increased risk of cancer incidence in this patient group., Materials and Methods: The study subjects were pediatric patients who had undergone one or more neuroangiographic procedures at Harborview Medical Center between December 1, 2004, and April 30, 2008. Recorded radiation doses were converted to entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (ED) to indicate deterministic and stochastic damage, respectively. The Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII, phase 2, report was used to estimate the expected increased risk of cancer in the study population., Results: For diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, a mean ED of 10.4 and 34.0 mSv per procedure was calculated, respectively. The ESD values proved too low to cause deterministic harm. The estimated number of excess cases of malignancy projected from the total average radiation exposure was 890.6 per 100,000 exposed male children and 1,222.5 per 100,000 exposed females, an overall increase of approximately 1% to the lifetime attributable risk of cancer., Conclusion: Although both angiography and CT have revolutionized the practice of medicine and confer benefits to patients, it is important that we continue to investigate the possible adverse effects of these technologies. Protocols that minimize radiation dose without compromising a study should be implemented.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the radiation dose reduction that could be achieved using an in-line bismuth shielding over the thyroid gland and breast and to determine the effect of a cervical spine collar on thyroid dose reduction and image noise when performing computed tomography of the cervical spine using automatic tube current modulation., Materials and Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a commercially available 64-channel computed tomographic scanner. A standardized trauma cervical spine protocol was used. Scans were obtained with and without a standard cervical spine immobilization collar and with and without bismuth-impregnated thyroid and breast shields. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed over the thyroid gland and breasts for each scan. A paired t test was used to determine whether the skin entry dose differed significantly between the shielded and unshielded thyroid and breast and to determine whether placing the thyroid shield over a cervical immobilization collar resulted in a significant dose reduction. Region of interest of pixel values was used to determine image noise., Results: The average measured skin entry dose for the unshielded thyroid gland was 21.9 mGy (95% confidence interval, 18.9-4.7). With a bismuth shield applied directly over the skin, the dose to the thyroid gland was reduced by 22.5% (P < 0.05). With the bismuth shield applied over the cervical spine collar, the dose reduction to the thyroid was 10.4%, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.16) compared with the dose reduction without the cervical collar. Skin entry dose over the breasts was significant, although they were outside the primary scan range. Without bismuth shielding, the skin entry dose was 1.5 mGy, and with bismuth shielding, the dose was significantly reduced by 36.6% (P < 0.01). Image noise increased most when shielding was used with an immobilization collar., Conclusions: There is a significant dose reduction to the thyroid gland and breasts when a bismuth shield is placed on the skin. The dose saving achieved by placing the shield on the cervical collar is approximately halved compared with placement on the skin, and this did not reach statistical significance, and this was accompanied by an increase on image noise. Bismuth shields should not be used in combination with cervical immobilization collars.

Background: Medical radiation from CT should be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), particularly in young patients., Objective: To examine radiation dose from head CT in children in a trauma center (TC) and a regional children's hospital (RCH)., Materials and Methods: A random sample of 240 children (0-3, 4-9, 10-14 years of age) from the TC were compared with a similar cohort from the RCH. All children had undergone at least one head CT scan without contrast enhancement; data from PACS and Department of Radiology Information System were used to estimate normalized effective dose (ED). Lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence was estimated using the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII report., Results: The mean normalized ED was significantly higher in the youngest children at the TC (2.74 mSv in those aged 0-3 years vs. 2.23 mSv in those aged 10-14 years; P<0.001) and at the RCH (2.44 mSv in those aged 0-3 years vs. 1.71 mSv in those aged 10-14 years; P<0.001). Each decreasing year of age was independently associated with a 0.06 mSv higher mean normalized ED (P<0.001). After adjusting for the age difference between the institutions, the mean normalized ED was 0.44 mSv lower at the RCH than at the TC across all ages (95% CI 0.31-0.58, P<0.001). A higher lifetime attributable risk of cancer was associated with younger age., Conclusion: The radiation dose from head CT in children as defined by the normalized ED was highest in the youngest children and varied significantly between institutions in this bi-institutional study.

Purpose: To compare radiologists' performance in detecting breast cancer when reading full-field digital mammographic (FFDM) images either displayed on monitors or printed on film., Materials and Methods: This study received investigational review board approval and was HIPAA compliant, with waiver of informed consent. A reader study was conducted in which 26 radiologists read screening FFDM images displayed on high-resolution monitors (soft-copy digital) and printed on film (hard-copy digital). Three hundred thirty-three cases were selected from the Digital Mammography Image Screening Trial screening study (n = 49,528). Of these, 117 were from patients who received a diagnosis of breast cancer within 15 months of undergoing screening mammography. The digital mammograms were displayed on mammographic workstations and printed on film according to the manufacturer's specifications. Readers read both hard-copy and soft-copy images 6 weeks apart. Each radiologist read a subset of the total images. Twenty-two readers were assigned to evaluate images from one of three FFDM systems, and four readers were assigned to evaluate images from two mammographic systems. Each radiologist assigned a malignancy score on the basis of overall impression by using a seven-point scale, where 1 = definitely not malignant and 7 = definitely malignant., Results: There were no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the primary comparison. The AUCs for soft-copy and hard-copy were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively (95% confidence interval: -0.04, 0.01; P = .36). Secondary analyses showed no significant differences in AUCs on the basis of manufacturer type, lesion type, or breast density., Conclusion: Soft-copy reading does not provide an advantage in the interpretation of digital mammograms. However, the display formats were not optimized and display software remains an evolving process, particularly for soft-copy reading.

Purpose: To retrospectively compare the accuracy for cancer diagnosis of digital mammography with soft-copy interpretation with that of screen-film mammography for each digital equipment manufacturer, by using results of biopsy and follow-up as the reference standard., Materials and Methods: The primary HIPAA-compliant Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) was approved by the institutional review board of each study site, and informed consent was obtained. The approvals and consent included use of data for future HIPAA-compliant retrospective research. The American College of Radiology Imaging Network DMIST collected screening mammography studies performed by using both digital and screen-film mammography in 49 528 women (mean age, 54.6 years; range, 19-92 years). Digital mammography systems from four manufacturers (Fischer, Fuji, GE, and Hologic) were used. For each digital manufacturer, a cancer-enriched reader set of women screened with both digital and screen-film mammography in DMIST was constructed. Each reader set contained all cancer-containing studies known for each digital manufacturer at the time of reader set selection, together with a subset of negative and benign studies. For each reader set, six or 12 experienced radiologists attended two randomly ordered reading sessions 6 weeks apart. Each radiologist identified suspicious findings and rated suspicion of breast cancer in identified lesions by using a seven-point scale. Results were analyzed according to digital manufacturer by using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity for soft-copy digital and screen-film mammography. Results for Hologic digital are not presented owing to the fact that few cancer cases were available. The implemented design provided 80% power to detect average AUC differences of 0.09, 0.08, and 0.06 for Fischer, Fuji, and GE, respectively., Results: No significant difference in AUC, sensitivity, or specificity was found between Fischer, Fuji, and GE soft-copy digital and screen-film mammography. Large reader variations occurred with each modality., Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were found between soft-copy digital and screen-film mammography for Fischer, Fuji, and GE digital mammography equipment.