Back to Search Start Over

Wide-detector axial CT versus 4 cm detector helical CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: iodine dose, radiation, and image quality.

Authors :
Shuman WP
Green DE
Busey JM
Ramos MM
Branch KR
Koprowicz KM
Kanal KM
Source :
Clinical imaging [Clin Imaging] 2016 Nov - Dec; Vol. 40 (6), pp. 1213-1218. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 04.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning on 16 cm wide-detector computed tomography (CT) to TAVR planning on 4 cm detector CT.<br />Materials and Methods: A total of 36 patients who had TAVR planning axial CT on a wide-detector scanner (protocol 1) were compared to 36 patients who had helical 4 cm detector CT (protocol 2).<br />Results: Vascular attenuation was greater for protocol 1, but image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio were the same. Radiation dose was lower and iodine dose was less for protocol 1.<br />Conclusion: Protocol 1 had greater vascular attenuation and similar image quality but lower radiation and less iodine compared to protocol 2.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-4499
Volume :
40
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27616154
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.08.002