Search

Background Secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Cases of SSC have been reported following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-SSC). The aim of this study was to compare COVID-SSC to SSC in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) and to assess factors influencing transplant-free survival. Methods In this retrospective, multicenter study involving 127 patients with SSC from 9 tertiary care centers in Germany, COVID-SSC was compared to SSC-CIP and logistic regression analyses were performed investigating factors impacting transplant-free survival. Results Twenty-four patients had COVID-SSC, 77 patients SSC-CIP, and 26 patients other forms of SSC. COVID-SSC developed after a median of 91 days following COVID-19 diagnosis. All patients had received extensive intensive care treatment (median days of mechanical ventilation, 48). Patients with COVID-SSC and SSC-CIP were comparable in most of the clinical parameters and transplant-free survival was not different from other forms of SSC (P = .443, log-rank test). In the overall cohort, the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (odds ratio [OR], 0.36 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .16–.80], P = .013; log-rank P < .001) and high serum albumin levels (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, .17–.96], P = .040) were independently associated with an increased transplant-free survival, while the presence of liver cirrhosis (OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.01–6.25], P = .047) was associated with worse outcome. Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization or infection did not impact patients’ survival. Conclusions COVID-SSC and CIP-SSC share the same clinical phenotype, course of the disease, and risk factors for its development. UDCA may be a promising therapeutic option in SSC, though future prospective trials are needed to confirm our findings.

ZusammenfassungDie chronische Hepatitis-C-Infektion kann unbehandelt zu schwerwiegenden und potenziell lebensbedrohlichen leberassoziierten Komplikationen führen. Grundsätzlich stellt damit jede chronische Infektion mit dem Hepatitis-C-Virus (HCV) eine Indikation zur antiviralen Therapie dar. Besonders dringlich ist sie jedoch bei Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Lebererkrankung. In diesem Beitrag werden Indikation, Therapieziele und Grundprinzipien der direkt antiviralen Therapie beschrieben. Verschiedene Therapieregime und Möglichkeiten der Überwachung von Therapie und Therapieerfolg werden vorgestellt.Heutzutage wird die chronische HCV-Infektion interferonfrei mit direkt antiviral wirksamen Medikamenten („direct acting antivirals“ – DAA) behandelt, wobei die Wahl der Medikamente von HCV-Genotyp, Vortherapie und Fibrosestatus abhängt. Patient*innen mit kompensierter Leberzirrhose und solche ohne Leberzirrhose weisen unter Behandlung vergleichbar hohe Viruseradikationsraten auf. Auch bei dekompensierter Leberzirrhose oder dialysepflichtiger Niereninsuffizienz und selbst bei Kindern ab einem Alter von 3 Jahren ist heutzutage eine sichere und hocheffiziente antivirale Behandlung möglich. Medikamenteninteraktionen sind zu beachten, können aber einfach und schnell im Internet überprüft werden. Auch wenn sich die Prognose nach HCV-Eradikation deutlich verbessert, sollten Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Leberfibrose bzw. einer Leberzirrhose lebenslang weiterbeobachtet werden, um die Entstehung eines hepatozellulären Karzinoms rechtzeitig zu erkennen (HCC-Surveillance).

Background & Aims There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Methods Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Results Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. Conclusions VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. Lay summary The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).

BACKGROUND Varices of the upper gastrointestinal tract are due to portal hypertension and can result from occlusion of the portal venous system. This report is of a 55-year-old man with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding due to stricture of the portal vein anastomotic site to inferior vena cava (IVC) 12 years after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. CASE REPORT A 55-year-old man presented bleeding episodes requiring transfusion of more than 70 units of red blood cells (RBCs), complicated by bacterial and viral infection episodes including cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and hepatitis E and transient impairment of function of the renal allograft. Endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan, and angiography revealed jejunal varices due to anastomotic stricture at the portal vein to IVC as the cause of the hemorrhage. Neither conservative therapy nor an anastomosis between the splenic vein of the graft and the internal iliac vein as a bypass could stop the life-threatening bleeding. During the recurrent bleeding, CD4 T lymphocytes were low, indicating immunodeficiency despite paused immunosuppressive therapy. After the hemorrhage resolved and immunosuppression was restarted, CD4 T lymphocyte levels normalized. Finally, to stop the hemorrhage and save the transplanted kidney and the patient's life, graft pancreatectomy was performed. Long-term damage to the renal transplant was not found. CONCLUSIONS This report is of a rare case of portal hypertension as a long-term complication of transplant surgery. Although acute venous thrombosis at the anastomotic site is a recognized postoperative complication of pancreatic transplant surgery, this case highlights the importance of post-transplant follow-up and diagnostic imaging.

ZusammenfassungNeben der eigentlichen definitiven Therapie einer akuten Blutung (z. B. durch endoskopische/operative Blutstillung oder Angiografie mit Coiling) kommt in der Akut- und Intensivmedizin der Optimierung der Blutgerinnung eine Schlüsselrolle zu. Dazu ist die Kenntnis der gängigen Gerinnungstests und ihrer Schwächen ebenso notwendig wie die korrekte Anwendung und Dosierung von Gerinnungsprodukten. Das Gerinnungsmanagement kann insbesondere bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose, angeborenen und erworbenen Gerinnungsstörungen sowie bei Patienten unter Antikoagulation herausfordernd sein. Dieses Review beleuchtet die wichtigsten Elemente der Gerinnungsdiagnostik und -therapie in der gastroenterologischen Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin inklusive neuer Antidote und erweiterter Gerinnungsdiagnostik bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose, wie z. B. die Thrombelastometrie.

Background&aims The presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) reduced sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a infected patients treated with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR). This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of NS5A RASs and treatment outcomes in patients for whom EBR/GZR was intended. Methods We sequenced NS5A in 832 samples from German genotype1a-infected DAA-naive patients population-based, which were collected in the European Resistance Database. Treatment outcomes and clinical parameters were evaluated in 519 of these patients retrospectively. Results Overall, 6.5% of patients harbored EBR-specific NS5A RASs at baseline, including Q30H/R (3.3%), L31M (1.8%), Y93H (1.6%) and other individual variants. Antiviral treatment, including EBR/GZR, was initiated in 88% of patients. In the absence of RASs, the majority of patients received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (57%) and the SVR rate was 97% compared to 99% SVR achieved using other DAA regimens (LDV/SOF±RBV, G/P, PrOD+RBV, VEL/SOF). Various regimens were used in the presence of RASs and SVR rates were high following treatment with LDV/SOF (100%), G/P (83%), PrOD/RBV (100%), VEL/SOF (100%), SMV/SOF (100%) and EBR/GZR+RBV for 16 weeks (100%). However, two patients received EBR/GZR for 16 weeks without RBV and one relapsed. Conclusions EBR/GZR treatment with or without RBV for 12 or 16 weeks according to a baseline RAS analysis was highly effective with ≥97% SVR in patients with genotype 1a. EBR/GZR without RBV should be avoided in patients with RASs. High SVR rates were also achieved using other 8 or 12 weeks DAA regimens.

Data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are limited. This study evaluated the persistence of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs for up to 5 years after the end of treatment (EOT).We included samples from 678 individuals with an HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection and virologic DAA treatment failure collected in the European Resistance Database. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B were sequenced, and clinical parameters were evaluated.A total of 242 individuals with HCV GT1a (36%), 237 with GT1b (35%), and 199 (29%) with GT3 and a DAA failure were included. After protease inhibitor failure, the frequencies of NS3 RASs were 40-90% after the EOT. NS3 RASs disappeared rapidly in GT1b and GT3 after follow-up month 3 but were stable (≥60%) in GT1a owing to Q80K. The SOF-resistant NS5B RAS S282T was only found in individuals with GT3a. Non-nucleoside NS5B RASs were frequent in GT1 (56-80%) and decreased to 30% in GT1a but persisted in GT1b. NS5A RASs were very common in all GTs after NS5A inhibitor failure (88-95%), and even after follow-up month 24, their frequency was 65% and higher. However, RASs in GT1b had a stable course, whereas RASs in GT1a and GT3 declined slightly after follow-up month 24 (GT1a, 68%; GT1b, 95%; and GT3, 65%), mainly because of the slow decline of high-level resistant Y93H.We found that low-to medium-level RASs persisted, whereas high-level resistant RASs disappeared over time. Different patterns of RAS persistence according to HCV subtype could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals.There are little data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after DAA treatment failure, and RASs could have an impact on the efficacy of a rescue treatment. Especially in countries with limited availability of VOX/VEL/SOF or G/P/SOF, different patterns of RAS persistence could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. The different patterns of RAS persistence identified in this study can be used to derive general rules regarding the persistence of RASs after DAA failure that could be applied by physicians in less developed countries to plan individualized HCV retreatment.

ObjectiveInvestigating the effect of ferroptosis in the tumour microenvironment to identify combinatory therapy for liver cancer treatment.DesignGlutathione peroxidase 4 (GPx4), which is considered the master regulator of ferroptosis, was genetically altered in murine models for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) to analyse the effect of ferroptosis on tumour cells and the immune tumour microenvironment. The findings served as foundation for the identification of additional targets for combine therapy with ferroptotic inducer in the treatment of HCC and liver metastasis.ResultsSurprisingly, hepatocyte-restricted GPx4 loss does not suppress hepatocellular tumourigenesis. Instead, GPx4-associated ferroptotic hepatocyte death causes a tumour suppressive immune response characterised by a CXCL10-dependent infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+T cells that is counterbalanced by PD-L1 upregulation on tumour cells as well as by a marked HMGB1-mediated myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration. Blocking PD-1 or HMGB1 unleashes T cell activation and prolongs survival of mice withGpx4-deficient liver tumours. A triple combination of the ferroptosis inducing natural compound withaferin A, the CXCR2 inhibitor SB225002 and α-PD-1 greatly improves survival of wild-type mice with liver tumours. In contrast, the same combination does not affect tumour growth of subcutaneously grown CRC organoids, while it decreases their metastatic growth in liver.ConclusionOur data highlight a context-specific ferroptosis-induced immune response that could be therapeutically exploited for the treatment of primary liver tumours and liver metastases.

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Cases of SSC have been reported following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), COVID-SSC.Aim of this study was to compare COVID-SSC to SSC in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) and to assess factors influencing transplant-free survival.In this retrospective, multicenter study involving 127 patients with SSC from 9 tertiary care centers in Germany, COVID-SSC was compared to SSC-CIP and logistic regression analyses were performed investigating factors impacting transplant-free survival.24 patients had COVID-SSC, 77 patients SSC-CIP and 26 patients had other forms of SSC. COVID-SSC developed after a median of 91 days following COVID-19 diagnosis. All patients had received extensive intensive care treatment (median days of mechanical ventilation 48). Patients with COVID-SSC and SSC-CIP were comparable in most of the clinical parameters and transplant-free survival was not different from other forms of SSC (P = 0.443 in log-rank test). In the overall cohort, the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, OR 0.36, 95%-CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.013; P 0.001 in log-rank test) and high serum albumin levels (OR 0.40, 95%-CI 0.17-0.96, P = 0.040) were independently associated with an increased transplant-free survival, while the presence of liver cirrhosis (OR 2.52, 95%-CI 1.01-6.25, P = 0.047) was associated with worse outcome. MDRO colonization or infection did not impact patients' survival.COVID-SSC and CIP-SSC share the same clinical phenotype, course of the disease and risk factors for its development. UDCA may be a promising therapeutic option in SSC, though future prospective trials need to confirm our findings.

Untreated chronic hepatitis C infection can lead to severe and potentially fatal liver-associated complications. Therefore, every hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents an indication for antiviral treatment. In particular, patients with progressive liver disease should be treated urgently. Here, we review indication for treatment as well as goals and basic principles of antiviral therapy. In addition, different treatment regimens and monitoring of the treatment course and outcome are discussed.Today, the treatment of chronic HCV infection is based on interferon-free regimens combining different direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), where the choice of DAA-regimen depends on the viral genotype, previous treatments, and the state of liver fibrosis. With these regimens, equally high virus eradication rates are achievable in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and in patients without advanced liver disease. In addition, patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis or patients with end-stage renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, as well as children from an age of 3 years, can be treated safely and highly efficiently with DAA-containing regimens. Physicians should be aware of possible drug interactions of the DAAs with concomitant administered drugs. However, possible interactions can be checked easily online. Although, there is an improvement of prognosis after HCV eradication, patients with advanced liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis must be included in a lifelong HCC surveillance program.Die chronische Hepatitis-C-Infektion kann unbehandelt zu schwerwiegenden und potenziell lebensbedrohlichen leberassoziierten Komplikationen führen. Grundsätzlich stellt damit jede chronische Infektion mit dem Hepatitis-C-Virus (HCV) eine Indikation zur antiviralen Therapie dar. Besonders dringlich ist sie jedoch bei Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Lebererkrankung. In diesem Beitrag werden Indikation, Therapieziele und Grundprinzipien der direkt antiviralen Therapie beschrieben. Verschiedene Therapieregime und Möglichkeiten der Überwachung von Therapie und Therapieerfolg werden vorgestellt.Heutzutage wird die chronische HCV-Infektion interferonfrei mit direkt antiviral wirksamen Medikamenten („direct acting antivirals“ – DAA) behandelt, wobei die Wahl der Medikamente von HCV-Genotyp, Vortherapie und Fibrosestatus abhängt. Patient*innen mit kompensierter Leberzirrhose und solche ohne Leberzirrhose weisen unter Behandlung vergleichbar hohe Viruseradikationsraten auf. Auch bei dekompensierter Leberzirrhose oder dialysepflichtiger Niereninsuffizienz und selbst bei Kindern ab einem Alter von 3 Jahren ist heutzutage eine sichere und hocheffiziente antivirale Behandlung möglich. Medikamenteninteraktionen sind zu beachten, können aber einfach und schnell im Internet überprüft werden. Auch wenn sich die Prognose nach HCV-Eradikation deutlich verbessert, sollten Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Leberfibrose bzw. einer Leberzirrhose lebenslang weiterbeobachtet werden, um die Entstehung eines hepatozellulären Karzinoms rechtzeitig zu erkennen (HCC-Surveillance).

Background: Naturally occurring variants with deletions or mutations in the C-terminal PreS1 domain from hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronically infected patients have been shown to promote HBsAg retention, inhibit HBsAg secretion and change the extracellular appearance of PreS1-containing HBV particles (filaments and virions). Aims: To study the impact of N-terminal deletion in preS1 domain on viral secretion and morphogenesis. Methods: An HBV mutant with 15 amino acids (aa 25-39) deletion in N-terminal preS1 was isolated. Intracellular and extracellular HBsAg were quantified by Western blot. Subcellular HBsAg distribution was analysed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The viral morphology was characterised by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, Western blot, electron microscopy, HBV mixed ELISA and HBV particle gel essay. Results: Expression of this mutant genome released higher amounts of HBsAg in the form of shorter filaments. A significant fraction of semi-enveloped virions was observed in the supernatant that has been unprecedented so far. Stepwise insertion of aa 25-31, aa 32-39 and aa 25-39 increased the length of filaments. The rescue of aa 25-31 and aa 25-39 drastically reduced the amounts of extracellular HBsAg and semi-enveloped virions, while such effects could not be observed after insertion of aa 32-39, arguing against a simple spacer function of this region. The deletion and rescued mutants do not differ in subcellular HBsAg distribution and colocalisation with ER, Golgi and multivesicular bodies markers arguing against differences in release pathways. Conclusion: N-terminal PreS1-domain (aa 25-31) determines HBsAg secretion and triggers proper assembly of PreS1-containing particles.

Introduction MDRO-colonization has been shown to impair survival in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors as well as in patients with liver disease. Despite the increasing spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO), its impact on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been studied. We conducted this retrospective study to analyze the impact of MDRO-colonization on overall prognosis in HCC patients. Materials and methods All patients with confirmed HCC diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2017 at the University Hospital Frankfurt were included in this study. HCC patients with a positive MDRO screening before or within the first 90 days after diagnosis of HCC were defined as colonized HCC patients, HCC patients with a negative MDRO screening were defined as noncolonized HCC patients. Results 59 (6%) colonized and 895 (94%) noncolonized HCC patients were included. Enterobacterales with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-like phenotype with or without resistance to fluoroquinolones (ESBL/ ± FQ) were the most frequently found MDRO with 59%, followed by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium with 37%. Colonized HCC patients had more severe cirrhosis and more advanced HCC stage compared to noncolonized HCC patients. Colonized HCC patients showed an impaired survival with a median OS of 189 days (6.3 months) compared to a median OS of 1001 days (33.4 months) in noncolonized HCC patients. MDRO-colonization was identified as an independent risk factor associated with survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion MDRO-colonization is an independent risk factor for survival in patients with HCC highlighting the importance of regular MDRO screening, isolation measures as well as interdisciplinary antibiotic steward-ship programs to guide responsible use of antibiotic agents.

Liver cirrhosis is a systemic disease that substantially impacts the body's physiology, especially in advanced stages. Accordingly, the outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring intensive care treatment is poor. We aimed to analyze the impact of cirrhosis on mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared to other frequent chronic diseases and conditions. In this retrospective study, patients admitted over three years to the ICU of the Department of Medicine of the University Hospital Frankfurt were included. Patients were matched for age, gender, pre-existing conditions, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS). A total of 567 patients admitted to the ICU were included in the study; 99 (17.5 %) patients had liver cirrhosis. A total of 129 patients were included in the matched cohort for the sensitivity analysis. In-hospital mortality was higher in cirrhotic patients than non-cirrhotic patients (p 0.0001) in the entire and matched cohort. Liver cirrhosis remained one of the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (entire cohort p = 0.001; matched cohort p = 0.03) along with dialysis and need for transfusion in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, in the cirrhotic group, the need for kidney replacement therapy (p 0.001) and blood transfusion (p 0.001) was significantly higher than in the non-cirrhotic group. CONCLUSIONS: In the presented study, liver cirrhosis was one of the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients needing intensive care treatment along with dialysis and the need for ventilation. Therefore, concerted efforts are needed to improve cirrhotic patients' outcomes, prevent disease progression, and avoid complications with the need for ICU treatment in the early stages of the disease. Die Leberzirrhose ist eine systemische Erkrankung mit erheblichen Auswirkungen auf die Physiologie des Körpers, insbesondere in fortgeschrittenen Stadien. Dementsprechend schlecht ist das Outcome von Patienten mit Zirrhose in Abhängigkeit von der intensivmedizinischen Behandlung. Ziel unserer Studies war es, den Einfluss der Zirrhose auf die Mortalität von Patienten auf der Intensivstation (ICU) im Vergleich zu anderen häufigen chronischen Krankheiten und Zuständen zu analysieren. In diese retrospektive Studie wurden Patienten eingeschlossen, die in einem Zeitraum von drei Jahren auf der Intensivstation der Medizinischen Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Frankfurt aufgenommen wurden. Die Patienten wurden hinsichtlich Alter, Geschlecht, Vorerkrankungen, Simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) und Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS) gematcht. Insgesamt wurden 567 Patienten, die auf der Intensivstation aufgenommen wurden, in die Studie aufgenommen; 99 (17,5 %) Patienten hatten eine Leberzirrhose. Für die Sensitivitätsanalyse wurden insgesamt 129 Patienten in die gematchte Kohorte aufgenommen. Die In-Hospital-Mortalität war bei zirrhotischen Patienten höher als bei nicht-zirrhotischen Patienten (p 0,0001) in der gesamten und gemachten Kohorte. Die Leberzirrhose blieb einer der stärksten unabhängigen Prädiktoren für die In-Hospital-Mortalität (gesamte Kohorte p = 0,001; gematchte Kohorte p = 0,03) zusammen mit Dialyse und Transfusionsbedarf in der multivariaten logistischen Regressionsanalyse. Darüber hinaus war in der zirrhotischen Gruppe der Bedarf an Nierenersatztherapie (p 0,001) und Bluttransfusion (p 0,001) signifikant höher als in der nicht zirrhotischen Gruppe. In der vorliegenden Studie war die Leberzirrhose einer der stärksten Prädiktoren für die In-Hospital-Mortalität bei Patienten, die eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung benötigten, zusammen mit Dialyse und Beatmungsbedarf. Daher sind konzertierte Anstrengungen erforderlich, um die Ergebnisse von zirrhotischen Patienten zu verbessern, ein Fortschreiten der Erkrankung zu verhindern und Komplikationen mit der Notwendigkeit einer intensivmedizinischen Behandlung bereits in den frühen Stadien der Erkrankung zu vermeiden.

In emergency medicine and intensive care the key to control active bleeding - besides definitive therapy (endoscopy, therapeutic angiography or operation) - often is to improve the patients clotting and thrombus formation. Knowledge about routine laboratory testing, their strength and weaknesses as well as indications and dosing of pro-coagulants and blood products remains pivotal in these situations. Achieving hemostasis can be especially challenging in patients with liver cirrhosis, innate or acquired coagulation disorders. This review summarizes the principles of hemostasis diagnostics and management in acute bleeding for gastroenterologists and hepatologists including novel available antidotes and innovative tools for patients with advanced liver disease such as thromboelastometry.Neben der eigentlichen definitiven Therapie einer akuten Blutung (z. B. durch endoskopische/operative Blutstillung oder Angiografie mit Coiling) kommt in der Akut- und Intensivmedizin der Optimierung der Blutgerinnung eine Schlüsselrolle zu. Dazu ist die Kenntnis der gängigen Gerinnungstests und ihrer Schwächen ebenso notwendig wie die korrekte Anwendung und Dosierung von Gerinnungsprodukten. Das Gerinnungsmanagement kann insbesondere bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose, angeborenen und erworbenen Gerinnungsstörungen sowie bei Patienten unter Antikoagulation herausfordernd sein. Dieses Review beleuchtet die wichtigsten Elemente der Gerinnungsdiagnostik und -therapie in der gastroenterologischen Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin inklusive neuer Antidote und erweiterter Gerinnungsdiagnostik bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose, wie z. B. die Thrombelastometrie.

The N-terminus of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) large surface protein (LHB) differs with respect to genotypes. Compared to the amino terminus of genotype (Gt)D, in GtA, GtB and GtC, an additional identical 11 amino acids (aa) are found, while GtE and GtG share another similar 10 aa. Variants of GtB and GtC affecting this N-terminal part are associated with hepatoma formation. Deletion of these amino-terminal 11 aa in GtA reduces the amount of LHBs and changes subcellular accumulation (GtA-like pattern) to a dispersed distribution (GtD-like pattern). Vice versa, the fusion of the GtA-derived N-terminal 11 aa to GtD causes a GtA-like phenotype. However, insertion of the corresponding GtE-derived 10 aa to GtD has no effect. Deletion of these 11aa decreases filament size while neither the number of released viral genomes nor virion size and infectivity are affected. A negative regulatory element (aa 2&ndash, 8) and a dominant positive regulatory element (aa 9&ndash, 11) affecting the amount of LHBs were identified. The fusion of this motif to eGFP revealed that the effect on protein amount and subcellular distribution is not restricted to LHBs. These data identify a novel region in the N-terminus of LHBs affecting the amount and subcellular distribution of LHBs and identify release-promoting and -inhibiting aa residues within this motive.

Aim Different combinations of direct antiviral agents (DAA) lead to high SVR rates in HCV genotype 1 infected patients. However, presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) represents a major risk factor for treatment failure. It is unknown whether choice of treatment based on RASs has the potential to decrease virologic failure rates. Methods Population-based sequencing of NS3 and NS5A genes was performed in HCV genotype 1 infected patients at a German university hospital. Treatment was individually selected based on resistance analyses. Results In total, 319 patients (50% treatment-experienced and 30% with cirrhosis) were included. With the treatment choice based on the baseline NS3 and NS5A resistance profile SVR rates between 96 and 100% were observed in all subgroups, including treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis and HCV genotype 1a infected cirrhotic patients. Conclusions The choice of treatment based on the RASs status at baseline may be beneficial for optimizing treatment efficacy in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and risk factors for treatment failure.

Background and Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and to compare HCC occurrence in these patients with that among patients treated with interferon (IFN)-based therapies. Methods: We analyzed a large cohort with chronic hepatitis C virus patients for the onset of new HCC after DAA treatment. A historical IFN-treated cohort was investigated for comparison. Results: A total of 819 patients were included in the DAA group. The median follow-up period was 263 days (0–1,001). Twenty-five patients (3.6 HCCs/100 person-years; 3.1%) were diagnosed with de novo HCC within the time of observation. No patient without cirrhosis had developed HCC. Patients with newly diagnosed HCC were mostly male, older, and treatment-experienced and had a lower 12-week sustained virologic response (SVR12) rate and higher levels of liver inflammation markers. The median time to HCC was 312 days (0–880). Investigation of the subcohort of 269 cirrhotic patients yielded an HCC rate of 8.9 HCCs/100 person-years. In this cohort, non-SVR12 was an independent risk factor for de novo HCC (HR 4.48; 95% CI 1.51–13.12; p = 0.007). Twenty-four patients (96%) with new HCC were Child-Pugh class A and 17 (68%) were diagnosed in early BCLC stage A. For the IFN-treated patients, we calculated an overall risk of HCC occurrence of 1.3/100 person-years (19 patients out of 351; 5.4%). The median time to diagnosis was 38.8 months (0–113). Conclusion: The de novo HCC rates did not differ between the DAA-treated patients and those who received IFN. Achievement of SVR is of utmost importance for HCC prevention.

Many mutation analyses of the HBV genome have been performed in the search for new prognostic markers. However, the Kozak sequence preceding precore was covered only infrequently in these analyses. In this study, the HBV core promoter/precore region was sequenced in serum samples from European inactive HBV carriers. Quadruple mutation GCAC1809-1812TTCT was found with a high prevalence of 42% in the Kozak sequence preceding precore among all HBV genotypes. GCAC1809-1812TTCT was strongly associated with coexistence of basal core promoter (BCP) double mutation A1762T/G1764A and lower HBV DNA levels. In vitro GCAC1809-1812TTCT lead to drastically diminished synthesis of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), precore mRNA, core, HBsAg, and HBeAg. Calculation of the pgRNA secondary structure suggests a destabilization of the pgRNA structure by A1762T/G1764A that was compensated by GCAC1809-1812TTCT. In 125 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis, GCAC1809-1812TTCT was not detected. While a strong association of GCAC1809-1812TTCT with inactive carrier status was observed, BCP double mutation was strongly correlated with cirrhosis, but this was only observed in absence of GCAC1809-1812TTCT. In conclusion, our data reveal that GCAC1809-1812TTCT is highly prevalent in inactive carriers and acts as a compensatory mutation for BCP double mutation. GCAC1809-1812TTCT seems to be a biomarker of good prognosis in HBV infection., HBV core promoter/precore region was sequenced in serum samples of European inactive HBV carriers, revealing that GCAC1809-1812TTCT mutation is highly prevalent in inactive carriers.

Besides seven major hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GT), a number of intergenotypic recombinant strains have been described. These so-called chimeras combine genetic characteristics of different HCV genotypes. However, correct genotype classification is important, as choice and duration of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment is mainly based on the viral genotype. Therefore, misclassification of chimeras might lead to suboptimal treatment of patients infected with these strains. For example, 2k/1b chimeras are typically described as HCV genotype 2 strains by commercially available hybridization assays, but real-time PCR-based tests recognizing another HCV region might be more suitable for correct chimera detection. In this study, the analytic capacity of the hybridization-assay Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 (LiPA 2.0) and the real-time PCR-based-assays cobas HCV GT and Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II were tested in a selected cohort of 230 patients infected with HCV genotype 1 (n = 53) and 2 (n = 177) and 48 patients infected with HCV 2/1 chimeric strains. While the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 (LiPA 2.0) assay failed to identify chimeras in all of the patients (48/48, 100%), cobas HCV GT and Abbott HCV Genotype II assays identified chimeras correctly in 90% (43/48) and 65% (31/48) of the cases, respectively. In conclusion, while the hybridization-based Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 (LiPA 2.0) assay seems to be unsuitable for detection of HCV 2/1 chimeras, use of the real-time PCR-based assays cobas HCV GT and Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II led to a higher rate of chimera detection.

Hepatitis C virus infection is causing chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. By combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), high sustained virologic response rates (SVRs) can be achieved. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) are commonly observed after DAA failure, and especially nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) RASs may impact retreatment options.1-3 Data on retreatment of DAA failure patients using first-generation DAAs are limited.4-7 Recently, a second-generation protease- and NS5A-inhibitor plus sofosbuvir (voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir [VOX/VEL/SOF]) was approved for retreatment after DAA failure.8 However, this and other second-generation regimens are not available in many resource-limited countries or are not reimbursed by regular insurance, and recommendations regarding the selection of retreatment regimens using first-generation DAAs are very important. This study aimed to analyze patients who were re-treated with first-generation DAAs after failure of a DAA combination therapy.

Background Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and active or previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) are at risk of HBV reactivation (HBV-R) during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. Recent reports suggest that HBV-R may even occur several months after completion of DAA therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of HBV-R in patients with resolved HBV after successful DAA therapy during long-term follow-up (FU). Methods Among 848 patients treated for chronic HCV, all patients with resolved HBV and long-term FU data were eligible for inclusion. Patients were HBV DNA/hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative at the end of therapy (EOT) and were followed for up to 52 weeks thereafter. Patients underwent regular alanine transaminase (ALT) testing, and additional HBV DNA/HBsAg testing was performed at FU week 12, end of FU, and in case of an ALT increase above the upper limit of normal (>ULN). Results A total of 108 patients were followed up for a mean (range) of 41.5 (24–52) weeks after EOT. None of the patients experienced reverse HBsAg seroconversion or reappearance of HBV DNA. One patient received a liver transplantation; 1 patient was diagnosed with de novo hepatocellular carcinoma, and 2 patients died. Eighteen patients (16.7%) had increased ALT levels (grade 0/1). Of those, the majority were male (72.2%) and significantly more patients had cirrhosis (66.7% vs 36.2%, P = .015) or received ribavirin as part of their treatment regimen (86.7% vs 46.8%, P = .041). None of these were associated with HBV-R. Conclusions Our results indicate that the risk of HBV-R in patients with resolved HBV treated with DAAs for HCV is low during long-term follow-up.

Objectives: Sphingolipids (SLs) have been implicated as potent regulators of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle. We investigated the SL biomarker potential regarding virologic endpoints in a prospective subgroup of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection. Methods: From 2009–2016 98 patients with HBeAg-negative HBV infection were prospectively followed over four years. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data were evaluated annually. SLs were assessed in available serum probes via liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Of those 98 patients, 10 (10.2%) showed HBV reactivation, 13 (13.2%) lost HBsAg and 9 (9.1%) gained status of HBsAg-/HBsAb-coexistence, whereas 66 (67.3%) had no events. Within the four-year analysis sphingosine (p = 0.020), sphinganine (p