Back to Search
Start Over
Failure on voxilaprevir, velpatasvir, sofosbuvir and efficacy of rescue therapy
- Source :
- Journal of Hepatology. 74:801-810
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background & Aims There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Methods Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Results Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. Conclusions VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. Lay summary The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Hepatitis C Virus
medicine.medical_specialty
Sofosbuvir
Voxilaprevir
Population
resistance-associated substitutions
Direct-acting antiviral
Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir
Gastroenterology
Settore MED/07
Telaprevir
03 medical and health sciences
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
Voxilaprevir/Velpatasvir/Sofosbuvir
Internal medicine
Boceprevir
Rescue therapy
medicine
Resistance-associated substitution
education
direct-acting antivirals
DAA
education.field_of_study
Hepatology
business.industry
virus diseases
Glecaprevir
HCV
rescue therapy
digestive system diseases
Pibrentasvir
Regimen
030104 developmental biology
chemistry
030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Hepatitis C viru
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 01688278
- Volume :
- 74
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Hepatology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....88cd0ab9dd512362a11eac31e987e6ab
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.017