Search

Background: Zanubrutinib (zanu) is a selective next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to have high specificity for BTK and minimize off-target effects (Guo, J Med Chem 2019;62:7923-40). In a phase 1/2 study, zanu demonstrated complete and sustained BTK occupancy in both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and lymph nodes and was associated with durable clinical responses in patients (pts) with CLL/SLL (Tam, Blood 2019;134:851-9). Here, we present interim results for the phase 3 SEQUOIA (BGB-3111-304; NCT03336333) trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of zanu vs BR in TN pts with CLL/SLL. Method(s): SEQUOIA is an open-label, global phase 3 study that randomized TN pts with CLL/SLL without del(17p) to receive zanu 160 mg twice daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity, or bendamustine 90 mg/m 2 on day 1 and 2 and rituximab 375 mg/m 2 in cycle 1, 500 mg/m 2 in cycles 2-6 for 6 x 28-day cycles. Adult pts with CLL/SLL who met International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) criteria for treatment (Hallek, Blood 2008;111:5446-56) were eligible if they were either >=65 y or unsuitable for treatment with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Central verification of del(17p) status by fluorescence in situ hybridization was required. Pts were stratified by age (<65 y vs >=65 y), Binet Stage (C vs A/B), IGHV mutational status, and geographic region. The primary endpoint was independent...Copyright © 2021 American Society of Hematology

Introduction: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an emerging standard of care for WM. The ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) is a randomized phase 3 study comparing zanubrutinib, a potent and selective BTK inhibitor, versus ibrutinib, a first generation BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Method(s): Patients with MYD88 mutation-positive (MYD88mut+) WM were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) or ibrutinib (420 mg once daily). Patients without MYD88 mutations were assigned to a separate cohort, received zanubrutinib, and are reported separately. Randomization was stratified by CXCR4 mutational status and the number of lines of prior therapy (0 vs 1-3 vs >3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response or very good partial response (CR+VGPR). Sample size was calculated to provide 81% power to detect a difference in CR+VGPR rate of 35% vs 15% in the subset of patients with relapsed or refractory WM. Primary analysis was planned to occur at ~12 months after the last patient enrolled. Result(s): In total, 201 patients were randomized from Jan 2017 to Jul 2018. The treatment groups were well balanced for important baseline factors, with the exception of more elderly patients (aged >75 years, 33.3% vs 22.2%) and more anemia (hemoglobin <=110 g/L, 65.7% vs 53.5%) in the zanubrutinib arm. At a median follow-up of 19.4 months, the rate of VGPR (no CRs were observed) was 28.4% vs 19.2% with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib, respectively (2-sided P=0.09). Rates of atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, edema peripheral, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, pneumonia, and adverse events leading to discontinuation or death were lower with zanubrutinib. The rate of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib (Table), but grade >=3 infection rates were similar (17.8% vs 19.4%). Conclusion(s): ASPEN is the largest phase 3 trial of BTK inhibitors in WM and the first head-to-head comparison of BTK inhibitors in any disease. Although

Zanubrutinib (zanu) is a selective nextgeneration Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to have high specificity for BTK and minimal off-target effects. SEQUOIA (NCT03336333) is an open-label, global phase 3 study that randomised treatment naive (TN) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) without del(17p) to receive zanu 160 mg twice daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity, or bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 in cycle 1, 500 mg/m2 in cycles 2-6 for 6 x 28-day cycles (BR). Adult patients who met International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) criteria for treatment were eligible if they were >= 65 years or unsuitable for treatment with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Central verification of del(17p) status by fluorescence in situ hybridisation was required. Patients were stratified by age (<65 years vs. >=65 years), Binet Stage (C vs. A/B), immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGHV) mutational status and geographical region. The primary end-point was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included PFS by investigator assessment (INV), overall response rate (ORR; by IRC and INV), overall survival (OS) and safety. Responses for CLL and SLL were assessed per modified iwCLL criteria and Lugano criteria respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded until disease progression. From 31 Oct 2017-22 Jul 2019, 479 patients without del(17p) were randomised to zanu ( n = 241) and BR ( n = 238). Treatment groups were well balanced for demographical and disease characteristics (zanu vs. BR): median age, 70.0 years vs. 70.0 years; unmutated IGHV, 53.4% (125/234) vs. 52.4% (121/231); and del(11q), 17.8% vs. 19.3%. At median followup (26.2 months), PFS was significantly prolonged with zanu versus BR as assessed by IRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63, 2-sided p < 0.0001), and INV (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.66, 2-sided p = 0

Background: ASPEN is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study comparing ZANU, a potent and selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), with the first-generation BTKi IBR in patients with WM. We present data with a median follow-up of 43 months. Method(s): Patients with MYD88 mutations were assigned to cohort 1 and randomized 1:1 to receive ZANU 160 mg twice daily or IBR 420 mg once daily. Randomization was stratified by CXCR4 mutational status and lines of prior therapy (0 vs 1-3 vs > 3). Patients without MYD88 mutations were assigned to cohort 2 and received ZANU 160 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving complete response or very good partial response (CR+VGPR). Result(s): A total of 201 patients (ZANU arm, n = 102; IBR arm, n = 99) were enrolled in cohort 1 and 28 patients were enrolled in cohort 2. A larger proportion of patients in the ZANU arm of cohort 1 vs IBR had CXCR4 mutations by next-generation sequencing (32% vs 20%, or 33 of 98 vs 20 of 92 with data available) and were aged > 75 years (33% vs 22%). Median duration of treatment was 42 months (ZANU) and 41 months (IBR), with 67% and 58% remaining on treatment, respectively. The CR+VGPR rate by investigator was 36% with ZANU vs 22% with IBR (p= 0.02) in cohort 1, and 31% in cohort 2. One patient achieved CR (cohort 2). In patients with wild type or mutant CXCR4 from cohort 1, CR+VGPR rates with ZANU vs IBR were 45% vs 28% (p= 0.04) and 21% vs 5% (p= 0.15), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not yet reached. Rates of atrial fibrillation, diarrhea, hypertension, localized infection, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, pneumonia, and adverse events leading to discontinuation or death were lower with ZANU vs IBR (Table). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter and hypertension were lower with ZANU vs IBR (0.2 vs 0.8 and 0.5 vs 1.0 persons per 100 person-months, respectively; p< 0.05). Rate of neutropenia was higher

Background: ZANU is a potent and selective next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) designed to have greater affinity to BTK while minimizing off-target inhibition of TEC-and EGFR-family kinases. ASPEN (NCT03053440) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study comparing ZANU with the first-generation BTKi IBR in pts with WM. We present data with a median follow-up of 43 months. Aim(s): To compare the efficacy and safety of ZANU vs IBR in pts with MYD88 mutant (MYD88mut) WM and ZANU in pts with wild-type MYD88 (MYD88wt) WM. Method(s): Pts with MYD88mut WM were assigned to cohort 1 and randomized 1:1 to receive ZANU 160 mg twice daily or IBR 420 mg once daily. Pts with MYD88wt were assigned to cohort 2 and received ZANU 160 mg twice daily until disease progression. Randomization was stratified by CXCR4 mutational status by Sanger sequencing and lines of prior therapy (0, 1-3, or >3). All pts gave informed consent. The primary endpoint was proportion of pts achieving very good partial response or better (VGPR + complete response [CR]). Primary analysis occurred at 19 months median follow-up, and final analysis is planned to occur ~4 years after the first pt enrolled. Result(s): A total of 201 pts (102 ZANU; 99 IBR) were enrolled in cohort 1 and 28 pts in cohort 2. Baseline characteristics in cohort 1 differed between pts treated with ZANU vs IBR in CXCR4 mutations by next-generation sequencing (32% vs 20%, or 33 of 98 vs 20 of 92 available samples, respectively) and pts aged >75 years (33% vs 22%, respectively). Median duration of treatment was 42 months (ZANU) and 41 months (IBR), with 67% and 58% remaining on treatment, respectively. The VGPR+CR rate by investigator was 36% with ZANU vs 22% with IBR (descriptive p = 0.02) in cohort 1, and 31% in cohort 2. One pt in cohort 2 obtained a CR. In pts with wild-type (65 ZANU; 72 IBR) or mutant CXCR4 (33 ZANU; 20 IBR) from cohort 1, VGPR+CR rates with ZANU vs IBR were 45% vs 28% (p = 0.04) and 21% vs 5% (p = 0.

Background: Zanubrutinib is a next-generation, selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). We compared zanubrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab to determine its effectiveness as frontline therapy in patients with CLL or SLL. Method(s): We conducted an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 study at 153 academic or community hospitals in 14 countries and regions. Eligible patients had untreated CLL or SLL requiring treatment as per International Workshop on CLL criteria; were aged 65 years or older, or 18 years or older and had comorbidities; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. A central interactive web response system randomly assigned patients without del(17)(p13.1) to zanubrutinib (group A) or bendamustine-rituximab (group B) by sequential block method (permutated blocks with a random block size of four). Patients with del(17)(p13.1) were enrolled in group C and received zanubrutinib. Zanubrutinib was administered orally at 160 mg twice per day (28-day cycles); bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 of body surface area on days 1 and 2 for six cycles plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 of body surface area the day before or on day 1 of cycle 1, and 500 mg/m2 of body surface area on day 1 of cycles 2-6, were administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival per independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population in groups A and B, with minimum two-sided alpha of 0.05 for superiority. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03336333, and is closed to recruitment. Finding(s): Between Oct 31, 2017, and July 22, 2019, 590 patients were enrolled; patients without del(17)(p13.1) were randomly assigned to zanubrutinib (group A; n=241) or bendamustine-rituximab (group B; n=238). At median follow-up of 26.2 months (IQR 23.7

Zanubrutinib is a selective Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor evaluated in multiple B-cell malignancy studies. We constructed a pooled safety analysis to better understand zanubrutinib-associated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and identify treatment-limiting toxicities. Data were pooled from 6 studies (N = 779). Assessments included type, incidence, severity, and outcome of TEAEs. Median age was 65 years; 20% were ≥75 years old. Most patients had Waldenström macroglobulinemia (33%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (29%), or mantle-cell lymphoma (19%). Median treatment duration was 26 months (range, 0.1-65); 16% of patients were treated for ≥3 years. Common nonhematologic TEAEs were upper respiratory tract infection (URI, 39%), rash (27%), bruising (25%), musculoskeletal pain (24%), diarrhea (23%), cough (21%), pneumonia (21%), urinary tract infection (UTI), and fatigue (15% each). Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were pneumonia (11%), hypertension (5%), URI, UTI, sepsis, diarrhea, and musculoskeletal pain (2% each). Atrial fibrillation and major hemorrhage occurred in 3% and 4% of patients, respectively. Atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and diarrhea occurred at lower rates than those reported historically for ibrutinib. Grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anemia (8%). Serious TEAEs included pneumonia (11%), sepsis (2%), and pyrexia (2%).Treatment discontinuations and dose reductions for adverse events occurred in 10% and 8% of patients, respectively. Thirty-nine patients (4%) had fatal TEAEs, including pneumonia (n = 9), sepsis (n = 4), unspecified cause (n = 4), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n = 5). This analysis demonstrates that zanubrutinib is generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with known BTK inhibitor toxicities; these were manageable and mostly reversible.

Context: The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, zanubrutinib, was designed for high BTK specificity and minimal toxicity. SEQUOIA (NCT03336333) is a global, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in treatment-naïve patients with CLL/SLL without del(17p) who were unsuitable for fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab. Design: Patients were randomized to receive zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) or bendamustine (day 1-2: 90 mg/m2) and rituximab (cycle 1: 375 mg/m2; cycles 2-6: 500 mg/m2); stratification factors were age (<65 years vs ≥65 years), Binet Stage, IGHV mutation, and geographic region. Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoint was an independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed (INV) PFS, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From October 31, 2017, to July 22, 2019, 479 patients were enrolled (zanubrutinib=241; BR=238). Baseline characteristics (zanubrutinib vs BR): median age, 70.0 years versus 70.0 years; unmutated IGHV, 53.4% versus 52.4%; del(11q), 17.8% versus 19.3%. With median follow-up of 26.2 months, PFS was significantly prolonged with zanubrutinib by IRC (HR 0.42; 2-sided P<.0001) and INV (HR 0.42; 2-sided P=.0001). Zanubrutinib treatment benefit occurred across age, Binet stage, bulky disease, del(11q) status, and unmutated IGHV (HR 0.24; 2-sided P<.0001), but not mutated IGHV (HR 0.67; 2-sided P=.1858). For zanubrutinib versus BR, 24-month PFS-IRC=85.5% versus 69.5%; ORR-IRC=94.6% versus 85.3%; complete response rate=6.6% versus 15.1%; ORR-INV=97.5% versus 88.7%; and 24-month OS=94.3% versus 94.6%. Select adverse event (AE) rates (zanubrutinib vs BR): atrial fibrillation (3.3% vs 2.6%), bleeding (45.0% vs 11.0%), hypertension (14.2% vs 10.6%), infection (62.1% vs 55.9%), and neutropenia (15.8% vs 56.8%). Treatment discontinuation due to AEs (zanubrutinib vs BR)=20 patients (8.3%) versus 31 patients (13.7%); AEs leading