Search

The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and the Lupus Foundation of America are developing a revised systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) damage index (the SLICC/ACR Damage Index [SDI]). Shifts in the concept of damage in SLE have occurred with new insights into disease manifestations, diagnostics, and therapy. We evaluated contemporary constructs in SLE damage to inform development of the revised SDI.We conducted a 3-part qualitative study of international SLE experts. Facilitated small groups evaluated the construct underlying the concept of damage in SLE. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique was conducted to achieve agreement on aspects of the conceptual framework and scope of the revised damage index. The framework was finally reviewed and agreed upon by the entire group.Fifty participants from 13 countries were included. The 8 thematic clusters underlying the construct of SLE damage were purpose, items, weighting, reversibility, impact, time frame, attribution, and perspective. The revised SDI will be a discriminative index to measure morbidity in SLE, independent of activity or impact on the patient, and should be related to mortality. The SDI is primarily intended for research purposes and should take a life-course approach. Damage can occur before a diagnosis of SLE but should be attributable to SLE. Damage to an organ is irreversible, but the functional consequences on that organ may improve over time through physiological adaptation or treatment.We identified shifts in the paradigm of SLE damage and developed a unifying conceptual framework. These data form the groundwork for the next phases of SDI development.

Blood dendritic cell antigen 2 (BDCA2) is a receptor that is exclusively expressed on plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which are implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus erythematosus. Whether treatment with litifilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against BDCA2, would be efficacious in reducing disease activity in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus has not been extensively studied.In this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults with histologically confirmed cutaneous lupus erythematosus with or without systemic manifestations in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous litifilimab (at a dose of 50, 150, or 450 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12. We used a dose-response model to assess whether there was a response across the four groups on the basis of the primary end point, which was the percent change from baseline to 16 weeks in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity score (CLASI-A; scores range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating more widespread or severe skin involvement). Safety was also assessed.A total of 132 participants were enrolled; 26 were assigned to the 50-mg litifilimab group, 25 to the 150-mg litifilimab group, 48 to the 450-mg litifilimab group, and 33 to the placebo group. Mean CLASI-A scores for the groups at baseline were 15.2, 18.4, 16.5, and 16.5, respectively. The difference from placebo in the change from baseline in CLASI-A score at week 16 was -24.3 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] -43.7 to -4.9) in the 50-mg litifilimab group, -33.4 percentage points (95% CI, -52.7 to -14.1) in the 150-mg group, and -28.0 percentage points (95% CI, -44.6 to -11.4) in the 450-mg group. The least squares mean changes were used in the primary analysis of a best-fitting dose-response model across the three drug-dose levels and placebo, which showed a significant effect. Most of the secondary end points did not support the results of the primary analysis. Litifilimab was associated with three cases each of hypersensitivity and oral herpes infection and one case of herpes zoster infection. One case of herpes zoster meningitis occurred 4 months after the participant received the last dose of litifilimab.In a phase 2 trial involving participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus, treatment with litifilimab was superior to placebo with regard to a measure of skin disease activity over a period of 16 weeks. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the effect and safety of litifilimab for the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. (Funded by Biogen; LILAC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02847598.).

Objectives To characterize the clinical presentation and outcomes of LN in a Hispanic cohort from Mexico. Methods We studied 440 subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus and biopsy-proven LN followed for >36 months. We obtained demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathological and treatment variables. All outcomes were analysed by survival analysis and included response to therapy, renal relapses, progression of kidney disease (decline in eGFR ≥ 30%, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease) and patient survival. Results The median age of the study cohort was 29 years (IQR 23–37) and 96% were female. The median eGFR at inclusion was 81 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 48–118) and 24 h-uPCR was 3.4 g/g (IQR 1.9–5.6). Mixed class LN (III/IV+V) was the most frequently observed (69%). Over a median follow-up of 79 months, complete response rates were 22.3%, 40.5% and 51.6%, at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Renal relapse rates were 32.3% and 50.6% at 3 and 5 years. By 3 and 5 years, 20.7% and 31.4% had decline in eGFR ≥30%, 14.4% and 22.5% doubled their serum creatinine, and 9.1% and 17.7% progressed to ESKD. The factors associated with loss of kidney function were age, eGFR at presentation, the histologic chronicity index in the kidney biopsy, and the type of response to therapy. Patient survival was 98.2% and 97.1% at 3 and 5 years. Conclusion Although the response to treatment and patient survival in this Latin American cohort is comparable to that observed in other regions, there is still a high rate of renal relapses and progression to decline in kidney function.

ObjectivesTo evaluate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares following hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) reduction or discontinuation versus HCQ maintenance.MethodsWe analysed prospective data from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) cohort, enrolled from 33 sites within 15 months of SLE diagnosis and followed annually (1999–2019). We evaluated person-time contributed while on the initial HCQ dose (‘maintenance’), comparing this with person-time contributed after a first dose reduction, and after a first HCQ discontinuation. We estimated time to first flare, defined as either subsequent need for therapy augmentation, increase of ≥4 points in the SLE Disease Activity Index-2000, or hospitalisation for SLE. We estimated adjusted HRs (aHRs) with 95% CIs associated with reducing/discontinuing HCQ (vs maintenance). We also conducted separate multivariable hazard regressions in each HCQ subcohort to identify factors associated with flare.ResultsWe studied 1460 (90% female) patients initiating HCQ. aHRs for first SLE flare were 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.38) and 1.56 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.86) for the HCQ reduction and discontinuation groups, respectively, versus HCQ maintenance. Patients with low educational level were at particular risk of flaring after HCQ discontinuation (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.87). Prednisone use at time-zero was associated with over 1.5-fold increase in flare risk in all HCQ subcohorts.ConclusionsSLE flare risk was higher after HCQ taper/discontinuation versus HCQ maintenance. Decisions to maintain, reduce or stop HCQ may affect specific subgroups differently, including those on prednisone and/or with low education. Further study of special groups (eg, seniors) may be helpful.

ObjectiveTo determine predictors of change in neuropsychiatric (NP) event status in a large, prospective, international inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsUpon enrollment and annually thereafter, NP events attributed to SLE and non-SLE causes and physician-determined resolution were documented. Factors potentially associated with the onset and resolution of NP events were determined by time-to-event analysis using a multistate modeling structure.ResultsNP events occurred in 955 (52.3%) of 1,827 patients, and 593 (31.0%) of 1,910 unique events were attributed to SLE. For SLE-associated NP (SLE NP) events, multivariate analysis revealed a positive association with male sex (P=0.028), concurrent non-SLE NP events excluding headache (P < 0.001), active SLE (P = 0.012), and glucocorticoid use (P = 0.008). There was a negative association with Asian race (P = 0.002), postsecondary education (P = 0.001), and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (P = 0.019) or antimalarial drugs (P = 0.056). For non-SLE NP events excluding headache, there was a positive association with concurrent SLE NP events (P < 0.001) and a negative association with African race (P = 0.012) and Asian race (P < 0.001). NP events attributed to SLE had a higher resolution rate than non-SLE NP events, with the exception of headache, which had comparable resolution rates. For SLE NP events, multivariate analysis revealed that resolution was more common in patients of Asian race (P = 0.006) and for central/focal NP events (P < 0.001). For non-SLE NP events, resolution was more common in patients of African race (P = 0.017) and less common in patients who were older at SLE diagnosis (P < 0.001).ConclusionIn a large and long-term study of the occurrence and resolution of NP events in SLE, we identified subgroups with better and worse prognosis. The course of NP events differs greatly depending on their nature and attribution.

Introduction Kidney survival rates in lupus nephritis (LN) remain suboptimal, with 10-20% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease by 10 to 20 years. Recently, the landscape of LN management has changed with the advent of new molecules that have demonstrated safety and efficacy in clinical trials. Areas covered : In this review, we approach the current state of LN management, the unmet therapeutic needs, and deep dive into voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) that has demonstrated improved efficacy when added to a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and glucocorticoid regimen, without an increase in adverse events. We focus on the characteristics of this new CNI and the studies that led to its approval by the US FDA. Expert opinion : Voclosporin adds to current therapeutic options for LN. This drug offers potential advantages over other CNIs. The addition of voclosporin to a standard-of-care regimen of MMF and glucocorticoids demonstrated higher and faster response rates. As for other regimens, a combination of CNI, MMF, and glucocorticoids must be individualized and is not appropriate for all patients. Some questions remain to be answered for this regimen, such as the length of treatment, the tapering schedule, and its long-term safety and efficacy for preserving kidney function.

Antibody-binding of blood dendritic cell antigen 2 (BDCA2), which is expressed exclusively on plasmacytoid dendritic cells, suppresses the production of type I interferon that is involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous litifilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to BDCA2, in patients with SLE have not been extensively studied.We conducted a phase 2 trial of litifilimab involving participants with SLE. The initial trial design called for randomly assigning participants to receive litifilimab (at a dose of 50, 150, or 450 mg) or placebo administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20, with the primary end point of evaluating cutaneous lupus activity. The trial design was subsequently modified; adults with SLE, arthritis, and active skin disease were randomly assigned to receive either litifilimab at a dose of 450 mg or placebo. The revised primary end point was the change from baseline in the total number of active joints (defined as the sum of the swollen joints and the tender joints) at week 24. Secondary end points were changes in cutaneous and global disease activity. Safety was also assessed.A total of 334 adults were assessed for eligibility, and 132 underwent randomization (64 were assigned to receive 450-mg litifilimab, 6 to receive 150-mg litifilimab, 6 to receive 50-mg litifilimab, and 56 to receive placebo). The primary analysis was conducted in the 102 participants who had received 450-mg litifilimab or placebo and had at least four tender and at least four swollen joints. The mean (±SD) baseline number of active joints was 19.0±8.4 in the litifilimab group and 21.6±8.5 in the placebo group. The least-squares mean (±SE) change from baseline to week 24 in the total number of active joints was -15.0±1.2 with litifilimab and -11.6±1.3 with placebo (mean difference, -3.4; 95% confidence interval, -6.7 to -0.2; P = 0.04). Most of the secondary end points did not support the results of the analysis of the primary end point. Receipt of litifilimab was associated with adverse events, including two cases of herpes zoster and one case of herpes keratitis.In a phase 2 trial involving participants with SLE, litifilimab was associated with a greater reduction from baseline in the number of swollen and tender joints than placebo over a period of 24 weeks. Longer and larger trials are required to determine the safety and efficacy of litifilimab for the treatment of SLE. (Funded by Biogen; LILAC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02847598.).

ObjectivesA perception derived from cross-sectional studies of small systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohorts is that there is a marked discrepancy between antinuclear antibody (ANA) assays, which impacts on clinicians’ approach to diagnosis and follow-up. We compared three ANA assays in a longitudinal analysis of a large international incident SLE cohort retested regularly and followed for 5 years.MethodsDemographic, clinical and serological data was from 805 SLE patients at enrolment, year 3 and 5. Two HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFA1, IFA2), an ANA ELISA, and SLE-related autoantibodies were performed in one laboratory. Frequencies of positivity, titres or absorbance units (AU), and IFA patterns were compared using McNemar, Wilcoxon and kappa statistics, respectively.ResultsAt enrolment, ANA positivity (≥1:80) was 96.1% by IFA1 (median titre 1:1280 (IQR 1:640–1:5120)), 98.3% by IFA2 (1:2560 (IQR 1:640–1:5120)) and 96.6% by ELISA (176.3 AU (IQR 106.4 AU–203.5 AU)). At least one ANA assay was positive for 99.6% of patients at enrolment. At year 5, ANA positivity by IFAs (IFA1 95.2%; IFA2 98.9%) remained high, while there was a decrease in ELISA positivity (91.3%, p91% agreement in ANA positivity at all time points and ≥71% agreement in IFA patterns between IFA1 and IFA2.ConclusionIn recent-onset SLE, three ANA assays demonstrated commutability with a high proportion of positivity and titres or AU. However, over 5 years follow-up, there was modest variation in ANA assay performance. In clinical situations where the SLE diagnosis is being considered, a negative test by either the ELISA or HEp-2 IFA may require reflex testing.

ObjectivesA novel longitudinal clustering technique was applied to comprehensive autoantibody data from a large, well-characterised, multinational inception systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort to determine profiles predictive of clinical outcomes.MethodsDemographic, clinical and serological data from 805 patients with SLE obtained within 15 months of diagnosis and at 3-year and 5-year follow-up were included. For each visit, sera were assessed for 29 antinuclear antibodies (ANA) immunofluorescence patterns and 20 autoantibodies. K-means clustering on principal component analysis-transformed longitudinal autoantibody profiles identified discrete phenotypic clusters. One-way analysis of variance compared cluster enrolment demographics and clinical outcomes at 10-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the HR for survival adjusting for age of disease onset.ResultsCluster 1 (n=137, high frequency of anti-Smith, anti-U1RNP, AC-5 (large nuclear speckled pattern) and high ANA titres) had the highest cumulative disease activity and immunosuppressants/biologics use at year 10. Cluster 2 (n=376, low anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) and ANA titres) had the lowest disease activity, frequency of lupus nephritis and immunosuppressants/biologics use. Cluster 3 (n=80, highest frequency of all five antiphospholipid antibodies) had the highest frequency of seizures and hypocomplementaemia. Cluster 4 (n=212) also had high disease activity and was characterised by multiple autoantibody reactivity including to antihistone, anti-dsDNA, antiribosomal P, anti-Sjögren syndrome antigen A or Ro60, anti-Sjögren syndrome antigen B or La, anti-Ro52/Tripartite Motif Protein 21, antiproliferating cell nuclear antigen and anticentromere B). Clusters 1 (adjusted HR 2.60 (95% CI 1.12 to 6.05), p=0.03) and 3 (adjusted HR 2.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 6.74), p=0.02) had lower survival compared with cluster 2.ConclusionFour discrete SLE patient longitudinal autoantibody clusters were predictive of long-term disease activity, organ involvement, treatment requirements and mortality risk.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystemic autoimmune disorder that predominantly affects women in reproductive years. Pregnancy in women with SLE is still considered a high-risk condition although several strategies may improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Preconception counseling is fundamental and should include identification of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, explanation of potential maternal and obstetric complications and timely planning of pregnancy. Risk stratification must consider end-organ damage, comorbidities, disease activity and autoantibodies profile in order to implement an individual-risk pregnancy monitoring plan by a multidisciplinary team. Hydroxychloroquine and low dose aspirin have shown to lower the risk of disease flares and preeclampsia with a good safety profile, so its use during pregnancy in all SLE patients is recommended. Lupus nephritis and preeclampsia share clinical and laboratory features hindering differentiation between both entities. Novel angiogenic markers and fetal ultrasound findings could be helpful in the differential diagnosis, especially after 20 weeks of gestation. Antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly lupus anticoagulant, are closely associated with obstetric complications. Therapy with low dose aspirin and heparin, according to risk profile, may improve live birth rates. Anti-Ro/La antibodies confer risk for neonatal lupus, and therefore preventive therapy and special fetal surveillance should be instituted. RESUMEN El lupus eritematoso sistémico es un trastorno autoinmune multisistémico que afecta primordialmente a mujeres en edad reproductiva. El embarazo en mujeres con LES aún se considera una condición de alto riesgo, a pesar de que diversas estrategias pueden mejorar los desenlaces maternos y fetales. La asesoría preconcepción es fundamental, y debe incluir la identificación de factores de riesgo de desenlaces adversos del embarazo, una explicación de las posibles complicaciones maternas y obstétricas, así como la planificación oportuna del embarazo. La estratificación de riesgos debe considerar el daño orgánico terminal, las comorbilidades, la actividad de la enfermedad y el perfil de autoanticuerpos, a fin de llevar a cabo un plan de monitoreo de los riesgos individuales del embarazo por parte de un equipo multidisciplinario. La hidroxicloroquina y la aspirina a bajas dosis han demostrado reducir el riesgo de exacerbaciones de la enfermedad y de preeclampsia, con un buen perfil de seguridad, por lo cual se recomienda su uso en todas las pacientes con LES durante el embarazo. La nefritis lúpica y la preeclampsia comparten características clínicas y de laboratorio, obstaculizando la diferenciación entre las 2 entidades. Nuevos marcadores angiogénicos y hallazgos ecográficos fetales pudieran ser de utilidad para el diagnóstico diferencial, especialmente después de las 20 semanas de gestación. Los anticuerpos antifosfolípidos, en particular el anticoagulante lúpico, tiene una estrecha asociación con las complicaciones obstétricas. El tratamiento con aspirina a bajas dosis y heparina, según el perfil de riesgos, puede mejorar las tasas de nacimientos vivos. Los anticuerpos anti-Ro/La representan un riesgo de lupus neonatal, por lo cual debe instituirse tratamiento preventivo y vigilancia fetal especial.

Background Voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with lupus nephritis, improved complete renal response rates in patients with lupus nephritis in a phase 2 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of voclosporin for the treatment of lupus nephritis.Methods This multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial was done in 142 hospitals and clinics across 27 countries. Patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, and a kidney biopsy within 2 years that showed class III, IV, or V (alone or in combination with class III or IV) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1) to oral voclosporin (23.7 mg twice daily) or placebo, on a background of mycophenolate mofetil (1 g twice daily) and rapidly tapered low-dose oral steroids, by use of an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was complete renal response at 52 weeks defined as a composite of urine protein creatinine ratio of 0.5 mg/mg or less, stable renal function (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or no confirmed decrease from baseline in eGFR of >20%), no administration of rescue medication, and no more than 10 mg prednisone equivalent per day for 3 or more consecutive days or for 7 or more days during weeks 44 through 52, just before the primary endpoint assessment. Safety was also assessed. Efficacy analysis was by intention-to-treat and safety analysis by randomised patients receiving at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03021499.Findings Between April 13, 2017, and Oct 10, 2019, 179 patients were assigned to the voclosporin group and 178 to the placebo group. The primary endpoint of complete renal response at week 52 was achieved in significantly more patients in the voclosporin group than in the placebo group (73 [41%] of 179 patients vs 40 [23%] of 178 patients; odds ratio 2.65; 95% CI 1.64-4.27; p

ObjectiveThe Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) frailty index (FI) predicts mortality and damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but its association with hospitalizations has not been described. Our objective was to estimate the association of baseline SLICC-FI values with future hospitalizations in the SLICC inception cohort.MethodsBaseline SLICC-FI scores were calculated. The number and duration of inpatient hospitalizations during follow-up were recorded. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate the association between baseline SLICC-FI values and the rate of hospitalizations per patient-year of follow-up. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of baseline SLICC-FI scores with the proportion of follow-up time spent in the hospital. Multivariable models were adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics.ResultsThe 1,549 patients with SLE eligible for this analysis were mostly female (88.7%), with a mean ± SD age of 35.7 ± 13.3 years and a median disease duration of 1.2 years (interquartile range 0.9-1.5) at baseline. Mean ± SD baseline SLICC-FI was 0.17 ± 0.08. During mean ± SD follow-up of 7.2 ± 3.7 years, 614 patients (39.6%) experienced 1,570 hospitalizations. Higher baseline SLICC-FI values (per 0.05 increment) were associated with more frequent hospitalizations during follow-up, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.13-1.30) after adjustment for baseline age, sex, glucocorticoid use, immunosuppressive use, ethnicity/location, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score, SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index score, and disease duration. Among patients with ≥1 hospitalization, higher baseline SLICC-FI values predicted a greater proportion of follow-up time spent hospitalized (relative rate 1.09 [95% CI 1.02-1.16]).ConclusionThe SLICC-FI predicts future hospitalizations among incident SLE patients, further supporting the SLICC-FI as a valid health measure in SLE.

Objective: There is a paucity of data regarding health care costs associated with damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus. The present study was undertaken to describe costs associated with damage states across the disease course using multistate modeling. Methods: Patients from 33 centers in 11 countries were enrolled in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort within 15 months of diagnosis. Annual data on demographics, disease activity, damage (SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]), hospitalizations, medications, dialysis, and selected procedures were collected. Ten-year cumulative costs (Canadian dollars) were estimated by multiplying annual costs associated with each SDI state by the expected state duration using a multistate model. Results: A total of 1,687 patients participated; 88.7% were female, 49.0% were white, mean ± SD age at diagnosis was 34.6 ± 13.3 years, and mean time to follow-up was 8.9 years (range 0.6–18.5 years). Mean annual costs were higher for those with higher SDI scores as follows: $22,006 (Canadian) (95% confidence interval [95% CI] $16,662, $27,350) for SDI scores ≥5 versus $1,833 (95% CI $1,134, $2,532) for SDI scores of 0. Similarly, 10-year cumulative costs were higher for those with higher SDI scores at the beginning of the 10-year interval as follows: $189,073 (Canadian) (95% CI $142,318, $235,827) for SDI scores ≥5 versus $21,713 (95% CI $13,639, $29,788) for SDI scores of 0. Conclusion: Patients with the highest SDI scores incur 10-year cumulative costs that are ~9-fold higher than those with the lowest SDI scores. By estimating the damage trajectory and incorporating annual costs, data on damage can be used to estimate future costs, which is critical knowledge for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of novel therapies.

ObjectiveTo determine the independent impact of different definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) on damage accrual.MethodsPatients with ≥2 annual assessments from a longitudinal multinational inception lupus cohort were studied. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states were defined: remission off-treatment: clinical Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (cSLEDAI)-2K=0, without prednisone or immunosuppressants; remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K score=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; low disease activity Toronto cohort (LDA-TC): cSLEDAI-2K score of ≤2, without prednisone or immunosuppressants; modified lupus low disease activity (mLLDAS): Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K score of 4 with no activity in major organ/systems, no new disease activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; active: all remaining visits. Only the most stringent definition was used per visit. Antimalarials were allowed in all. The proportion of time that patients were in a specific state at each visit since cohort entry was determined. Damage accrual was ascertained with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). Univariable and multivariable generalised estimated equation negative binomial regression models were used. Time-dependent covariates were determined at the same annual visit as the disease activity state but the SDI at the subsequent visit.ResultsThere were 1652 patients, 1464 (88.6%) female, mean age at diagnosis 34.2 (SD 13.4) years and mean follow-up time of 7.7 (SD 4.8) years. Being in remission off-treatment, remission on-treatment, LDA-TC and mLLDAS (per 25% increase) were each associated with a lower probability of damage accrual (remission off-treatment: incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.75, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.81; remission on-treatment: IRR=0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.75; LDA: IRR=0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92; and mLLDAS: IRR=0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.89)).ConclusionsRemission on-treatment and off-treatment, LDA-TC and mLLDAS were associated with less damage accrual, even adjusting for possible confounders and effect modifiers.

A renal biopsy is the 'gold standard' for diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis (LN). The role of repeat renal biopsy in lupus nephritis (LN) to guide treatment or predict prognosis has been controversial. A systematic literature review was conducted based on retrospective and prospective studies. The studies were identified using English electronic scientific databases, including MEDLINE PUBMED, published between January 1990 and August 2020. The eligibility criteria were studies including adult LN patients with at least one follow-up renal biopsy with appropriate longitudinal information. Case reports, studies with incomplete information or including duplicate patients were excluded. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 73 publications were identified. This study included a total of 1167 repeat biopsies in LN patients from 15 studies. The primary indication for a repeat biopsy was relapse in 44-78% of the cases, and lack of response in 13-51%. Additionally, several repeat biopsies were done according to the protocol, after induction and maintenance therapy. In terms of histopathological class switches, there was a higher frequency of changes from nonproliferative to proliferative lesions. Only two studies provide a definition of histological response. There were often changes in the therapeutic approach after a repeat biopsy. Repeat kidney biopsies are helpful in patients with LN flare/relapse, and in patients with poor treatment response. Histological transformation was a common finding. The histologic and clinical responses are discordant. A repeat biopsy could be of prognostic value for therapeutic decision-making. RESUMEN La biopsia renal es el «estándar de oro» para el diagnóstico y la clasificación de la nefritis lúpica (NL). El papel de la biopsia renal repetida en nefritis lúpica para orientar el tratamiento o predecir el pronóstico ha sido controversial. Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura basada en estudios retrospectivos y prospectivos. Los estudios se identificaron a través de bases de datos científicas electrónicas en inglés, incluyendo Medline PubMed, de publicaciones entre enero de 1990 y agosto del 2020. Los criterios de elegibilidad fueron estudios que incluyeran a pacientes adultos con NL, quienes tuvieran al menos una biopsia renal de seguimiento, con información longitudinal apropiada. Se excluyeron informes de casos, estudios con información incompleta o con pacientes duplicados. Basándose en los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, se identificaron 73 publicaciones. En la presente revisión se analizaron un total de 1.167 biopsias repetidas en pacientes con NL en 15 estudios. Las principales indicaciones para la biopsia repetida fueron: recidiva en 44-78% de los casos, y falta de respuesta en 13-51%. Adicionalmente, varias biopsias repetidas se hicieron conforme al protocolo, luego de la terapia de inducción y de mantenimiento. Con respecto a los cambios de clase histopatológica, hubo una mayor frecuencia de cambios de lesiones no proliferativas a lesiones proliferativas. Solamente dos estudios ofrecen una definición de respuesta histológica. Con frecuencia hubo cambios en el abordaje terapéutico después de realizar la biopsia repetida. Las biopsias renales repetidas son útiles en pacientes con exacerbación/recidiva y en pacientes con falta de respuesta a tratamiento. La transformación histológica fue un hallazgo frecuente; las respuestas histológicas y clínicas son discordantes. Una biopsia repetida puede ser de valor pronóstico para la toma de decisiones terapéuticas.

Funder: Lupus Foundation of America, Inc, Objective: In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), disease activity and glucocorticoid (GC) exposure are known to contribute to irreversible organ damage. We aimed to examine the association between GC exposure and organ damage occurrence. Methods: We conducted a literature search (PubMed (Medline), Embase and Cochrane January 1966���October 2021). We identified original longitudinal observational studies reporting GC exposure as the proportion of users and/or GC use with dose information as well as the occurrence of new major organ damage as defined in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Meta-regression analyses were performed. Reviews, case-reports and studies with

Objective: To assess cancer risk factors in incident systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Clinical variables and cancer outcomes were assessed annually among incident SLE patients. Multivariate hazard regression models (overall risk and most common cancers) included demographic characteristics and time-dependent medications (corticosteroids, antimalarial drugs, immunosuppressants), smoking, and the adjusted mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score. Results: Among 1,668 patients (average 9 years follow-up), 65 cancers occurred: 15 breast, 10 nonmelanoma skin, 7 lung, 6 hematologic, 6 prostate, 5 melanoma, 3 cervical, 3 renal, 2 each gastric, head and neck, and thyroid, and 1 each rectal, sarcoma, thymoma, and uterine cancers. Half of the cancers (including all lung cancers) occurred in past/current smokers, versus one-third of patients without cancer. Multivariate analyses indicated that overall cancer risk was related primarily to male sex and older age at SLE diagnosis. In addition, smoking was associated with lung cancer. For breast cancer risk, age was positively associated and antimalarial drugs were negatively associated. Antimalarial drugs and higher disease activity were also negatively associated with nonmelanoma skin cancer risk, whereas age and cyclophosphamide were positively associated. Disease activity was associated positively with hematologic and negatively with nonmelanoma skin cancer risk. Conclusion: Smoking is a key modifiable risk factor, especially for lung cancer, in SLE. Immunosuppressive medications were not clearly associated with higher risk except for cyclophosphamide and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Antimalarials were negatively associated with breast cancer and nonmelanoma skin cancer risk. SLE activity was associated positively with hematologic cancer and negatively with nonmelanoma skin cancer. Since the absolute number of cancers was small, additional follow-up will help consolidate these findings.

ObjectiveTo achieve consensus on a definition of remission in SLE (DORIS).BackgroundRemission is the stated goal for both patient and caregiver, but consensus on a definition of remission has been lacking. Previously, an international task force consisting of patient representatives and medical specialists published a framework for such a definition, without reaching a final recommendation.MethodsSeveral systematic literature reviews were performed and specific research questions examined in suitably chosen data sets. The findings were discussed, reformulated as recommendations and voted on.ResultsBased on data from the literature and several SLE-specific data sets, a set of recommendations was endorsed. Ultimately, the DORIS Task Force recommended a single definition of remission in SLE, based on clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activitiy index (SLEDAI)=0, Evaluator’s Global Assessment ConclusionThe 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE is recommended for use in clinical care, education, and research including clinical trials and observational studies.

Objectives Vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency and metabolic syndrome (MetS) may both contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in SLE. We aimed to examine the association of demographic factors, SLE phenotype, therapy and vitamin D levels with MetS and insulin resistance. Methods The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) enrolled patients recently diagnosed with SLE ( Results Of the 1847 patients, 1163 (63%) had vitamin D measured and 398 (34.2%) subjects were in the lowest 25(OH)D tertile. MetS was present in 286 of 860 (33%) patients whose status could be determined. Patients with lower 25(OH)D were more likely to have MetS and higher HOMA-IR. The MetS components, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were all significantly associated with lower 25(OH)D. Increased average glucocorticoid exposure was associated with higher insulin resistance. Conclusions MetS and insulin resistance are associated with lower vitamin D in patients with SLE. Further studies could determine whether vitamin D repletion confers better control of these cardiovascular risk factors and improve long-term outcomes in SLE.

ObjectiveTo evaluate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)-related retinal toxicity in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort.MethodsData were collected at annual study visits between 1999 and 2019. We followed patients with incident SLE from first visit on HCQ (time zero) up to time of retinal toxicity (outcome), death, loss-to-follow-up or end of study. Potential retinal toxicity was identified from SLICC Damage Index scores; cases were confirmed with chart review. Using cumulative HCQ duration as the time axis, we constructed univariate Cox regression models to assess if covariates (ie, HCQ daily dose/kg, sex, race/ethnicity, age at SLE onset, education, body mass index, renal damage, chloroquine use) were associated with HCQ-related retinal toxicity.ResultsWe studied 1460 patients (89% female, 52% white). Retinal toxicity was confirmed in 11 patients (incidence 1.0 per 1000 person-years, 0.8% overall). Average cumulative time on HCQ in those with retinal toxicity was 7.4 (SD 3.2) years; the first case was detected 4 years after HCQ initiation. Risk of retinal toxicity was numerically higher in older patients at SLE diagnosis (univariate HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09).ConclusionsThis is the first assessment of HCQ and retinal disease in incident SLE. We did not see any cases of retinopathy within the first 4 years of HCQ. Cumulative HCQ may be associated with increased risk. Ophthalmology monitoring (and formal assessment of cases of potential toxicity, by a retinal specialist) remains important, especially in patients on HCQ for 10+ years, those needing higher doses and those of older age at SLE diagnosis.

ObjectiveWe conducted an international survey of patients with SLE to assess their access, preference and trust in various health information sources pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsPatients with SLE were recruited from 18 observational cohorts, and patients self-reporting SLE were recruited through five advocacy organisations. Respondents completed an online survey from June 2020 to December 2021 regarding the sources of health information they accessed in the 12 months preceding (pre-11 March 2020) and during (post-11 March 2020) the pandemic. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed factors associated with accessing news and social media post-11 March 2020, and self-reporting negative impacts from health information accessed through these sources.ResultsSurveys were completed by 2111 respondents; 92.8% were female, 76.6% had postsecondary education, mean (SD) age was 48.8 (14.0) years. Lupus specialists and family physicians were the most preferred sources pre-11 March 2020 and post-11 March 2020, yet were accessed less frequently (specialists: 78.5% pre vs 70.2% post, difference −8.3%, 95% CI −10.2% to −6.5%; family physicians: 57.1% pre vs 50.0% post, difference −7.1%, 95% CI −9.2% to −5.0%), while news (53.2% pre vs 62.1% post, difference 8.9%, 95% CI 6.7% to 11.0%) and social media (38.2% pre vs 40.6% post, difference 2.4%, 95% CI 0.7% to 4.2%) were accessed more frequently post-11 March 2020 vs pre-11 March 2020. 17.2% of respondents reported negative impacts from information accessed through news/social media. Those outside Canada, older respondents or with postsecondary education were more likely to access news media. Those in Asia, Latin America or younger respondents were more likely to access social media. Those in Asia, older respondents, males or with postsecondary education in Canada, Asia or the USA were less likely to be negatively impacted.ConclusionsPhysicians, the most preferred and trusted sources, were accessed less frequently, while news and social media, less trusted sources, were accessed more frequently post-11 March 2020 vs pre-11 March 2020. Increasing accessibility to physicians, in person and virtually, may help reduce the consequences of accessing misinformation/disinformation.

Background and Aims In patients (pts) with SLE, activation of the CD40–CD40L pathway results in stimulation and proliferation of B cells and other inflammatory cell types. The subsequent generation of autoantibodies and their deposition in the kidney, as well as activation of myeloid and resident kidney cells, result in local inflammation and eventually, kidney injury. Thus, CD40 is an appealing therapeutic target in lupus nephritis (LN). BI 655064 is a humanised anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that blocks the CD40 pathway in a nanomolar range and downregulates activated B cells. This study assessed the efficacy and safety over 52 weeks (wks) of three doses of subcutaneous BI 655064 compared with placebo, as add-on to mycophenolate and steroids, in pts with active proliferative LN (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02770170). Method Overall, 121 pts with LN were randomised, double blind, in a 2:1:1:2 ratio to placebo or BI 655064 120 mg, 180 mg or 240 mg, and received a weekly loading dose for the first 3 wks, followed by dosing every 2 wks for the 120 and 180 mg doses, and weekly (120 mg) for the 240 mg group. Key inclusion criteria included an active ISN/RPS class III or IV (±V) renal biopsy within 3 months prior to screening and a screening protein/creatinine ratio of ≥1 mg/mg. Randomisation was stratified based on race (Asian vs non-Asian) and screening protein/creatine (UP/UC) ratio ( Results The placebo response in this trial was higher than expected (48.3%; Table 1); none of the BI 655064 doses increased rates of CRR at Wk 52 compared with placebo. However, CRR at Wk 52 based on creatinine-adjusted proteinuria, assessed using spot urine, showed a better response in the 180 mg group (50%) vs placebo (42.5%), and the 180 mg dose showed a greater change from baseline over time vs placebo from Wk 4. Time to CRR was shorter in the 180 mg group (17.3 wks) vs placebo (20.4 wks). The 180 mg group also showed improvement vs placebo in total SLEDAI (SELENA) and its subscores. The unexpected high placebo response prompted a post hoc analysis evaluating confirmed CRR (cCRR), whereby confirmation of the endpoint was required at both Wks 46 (penultimate visit on treatment) and 52. A 15.2% higher cCRR in the 180 mg group (44.3%) vs placebo (29.1%) was observed (p=0.26). While based on a small sample size, there were more reports of infection-related severe and serious adverse events and neutropenia in the 240 mg group compared with placebo. Of note, in those who experienced neutropenia, a clinical impact (e.g. increase in infections) was not established. Aside from these observations, safety data were comparable across treatment groups. Larger decreases from baseline were observed in the percentage of CD27−IgD−CD95+, CD27−IgD+CD95+, CD27+IgD+CD95+ and CD27+IgD−CD95+ B-cell subsets in the 180 and 240 mg groups compared with placebo. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were detected in five pts treated with BI 655054, all at low titre, and in one who received placebo; ADAs had no impact on pharmacokinetics or safety. Conclusion The trial did not meet its primary CRR endpoint. However, when confirmation of CRR was required at both Wks 46 and 52, the resultant decrease in the placebo response generated an effect size of 15.2% and 9.1% in favour of 180 mg and 240 mg BI 655064, respectively.

Objective: The spectrum of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) is changing to include both nuclear staining as well as cytoplasmic and mitotic cell patterns (CMPs) and accordingly a change is occurring in terminology to anticellular antibodies. This study examined the prevalence of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) anticellular antibody staining using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort.Methods: Anticellular antibodies were detected by IIF on HEp-2000 substrate using the baseline serum. Three serologic subsets were examined: ANA positive (presence of either nuclear or mixed nuclear/CMP staining), anticellular antibody negative (absence of any intracellular staining), and isolated CMP staining. The odds of being anticellular antibody negative versus ANA or isolated CMP positive was assessed by multivariable analysis.Results: A total of 1,137 patients were included; 1,049 (92.3%) were ANA positive, 71 (6.2%) were anticellular antibody negative, and 17 (1.5%) had an isolated CMP. The isolated CMP–positive group did not differ from the ANA-positive or anticellular antibody–negative groups in clinical, demographic, or serologic features. Patients who were older (odds ratio [OR] 1.02 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.00, 1.04]), of white race/ethnicity (OR 3.53 [95% CI 1.77, 7.03]), or receiving high-dose glucocorticoids at or prior to enrollment (OR 2.39 [95% CI 1.39, 4.12]) were more likely to be anticellular antibody negative. Patients on immunosuppressants (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.19, 0.64]) or with anti-SSA/Ro 60 (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.23, 0.74]) or anti–U1 RNP (OR 0.43 [95% CI 0.20, 0.93]) were less likely to be anticellular antibody negative. Conclusion: In newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus, 6.2% of patients were anticellular antibody negative, and 1.5% had an isolated CMP. The prevalence of anticellular antibody–negative systemic lupus erythematosus will likely decrease as emerging nomenclature guidelines recommend that non-nuclear patterns should also be reported as a positive ANA.

Objectives To assess the prevalence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in reproductive-age women with SLE with and without possible contraindications and to determine factors associated with their use in the presence of possible contraindications. Methods This observational cohort study included premenopausal women ages 18–45 years enrolled in the SLICC Registry ⩽15 months after SLE onset, with annual assessments spanning 2000–2017. World Health Organization Category 3 or 4 contraindications to CHCs (e.g. hypertension, aPL) were assessed at each study visit. High disease activity (SLEDAI score >12 or use of >0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone) was considered a relative contraindication. Results A total of 927 SLE women contributed 6315 visits, of which 3811 (60%) occurred in the presence of one or more possible contraindication to CHCs. Women used CHCs during 512 (8%) visits, of which 281 (55%) took place in the setting of one or more possible contraindication. The most frequently observed contraindications were aPL (52%), hypertension (34%) and migraine with aura (22%). Women with one or more contraindication were slightly less likely to be taking CHCs [7% of visits (95% CI 7, 8)] than women with no contraindications [9% (95% CI 8, 10)]. Conclusion CHC use was low compared with general population estimates (>35%) and more than half of CHC users had at least one possible contraindication. Many yet unmeasured factors, including patient preferences, may have contributed to these observations. Further work should also aim to clarify outcomes associated with this exposure.

To validate the association of thrombotic events with positive lupus anticoagulant (LA) and co-presence of anti-RNP/Sm, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of this combination of antibodies for thrombosis. Case-control study of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who presented thrombosis after SLE diagnosis and controls with SLE without thrombosis. Comorbidities, traditional risk factors, clinical variables, and treatment were evaluated. Antiphospholipid (aPL) and anti-RNP/Sm antibodies were determined. Sixty-three cases and 63 controls were studied, 88% women, median age of 40 years, and disease duration of 135 months at study inclusion. No differences were found between groups regarding age, comorbidities, or clinical characteristics at SLE diagnosis. Patients with thrombosis were more frequently positive for anti-RNP/Sm (p = 0.001), IgG aCL (p = 0.02), IgG anti-B2GPI (p = 0.02), IgM anti-B2GPI (p = 0.02), LA (p

Background/objectives The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus system showed high specificity, while attaining also high sensitivity. We hereby analysed the performance of the individual criteria items and their contribution to the overall performance of the criteria. Methods We combined the EULAR/ACR derivation and validation cohorts for a total of 1197 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and n=1074 non-SLE patients with a variety of conditions mimicking SLE, such as other autoimmune diseases, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and the 23 specific criteria items. We also tested performance omitting the EULAR/ACR criteria attribution rule, which defines that items are only counted if not more likely explained by a cause other than SLE. Results Positive ANA, the new entry criterion, was 99.5% sensitive, but only 19.4% specific, against a non-SLE population that included other inflammatory rheumatic, infectious, malignant and metabolic diseases. The specific criteria items were highly variable in sensitivity (from 0.42% for delirium and 1.84% for psychosis to 75.6% for antibodies to double-stranded DNA), but their specificity was uniformly high, with low C3 or C4 (83.0%) and leucopenia Conclusions Changing the position of the highly sensitive, non-specific ANA to an entry criterion and the attribution rule resulted in a specificity of >80% for all items, explaining the higher overall specificity of the criteria set.

Funder: American College of Rheumatology Research and Education Foundation; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000960, Funder: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000069, Funder: European League Against Rheumatism; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008741, OBJECTIVES: The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria. METHODS: Twenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to

Objective: In previous studies, atherosclerotic vascular events (AVEs) were shown to occur in ~10% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We undertook this study to investigate the annual occurrence and potential risk factors for AVEs in a multinational, multiethnic inception cohort of patients with SLE. Methods: A large 33-center cohort of SLE patients was followed up yearly between 1999 and 2017. AVEs were attributed to atherosclerosis based on SLE being inactive at the time of the AVE as well as typical atherosclerotic changes observed on imaging or pathology reports and/or evidence of atherosclerosis elsewhere. Analyses included descriptive statistics, rate of AVEs per 1,000 patient-years, and univariable and multivariable relative risk regression models. Results: Of the 1,848 patients enrolled in the cohort, 1,710 had ≥1 follow-up visit after enrollment, for a total of 13,666 patient-years. Of these 1,710 patients, 3.6% had ≥1 AVEs attributed to atherosclerosis, for an event rate of 4.6 per 1,000 patient-years. In multivariable analyses, lower AVE rates were associated with antimalarial treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.32–0.91]), while higher AVE rates were associated with any prior vascular event (HR 4.00 [95% CI 1.55–10.30]) and a body mass index of >40 kg/m2 (HR 2.74 [95% CI 1.04–7.18]). A prior AVE increased the risk of subsequent AVEs (HR 5.42 [95% CI 3.17–9.27], P < 0.001). Conclusion: The prevalence of AVEs and the rate of AVE accrual demonstrated in the present study is much lower than that seen in previously published data. This may be related to better control of both the disease activity and classic risk factors.

Background:In patients with SLE, activation of the CD40–CD40L pathway results in stimulation and proliferation of B cells and other inflammatory cell types. The subsequent generation of autoantibodies and their deposition in the kidney, as well as activation of myeloid and resident kidney cells, result in local inflammation and eventually, kidney injury. Thus, CD40 is an appealing therapeutic target in lupus nephritis (LN). BI 655064 is a humanised anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that blocks the CD40 pathway in a nanomolar range and downregulates activated B cells.Objectives:To assess the efficacy and safety over 52 weeks of three doses of subcutaneous BI 655064 compared with placebo, as add-on to mycophenolate and steroids, in patients with active proliferative LN (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02770170).Methods:Overall, 121 patients with LN were randomised, double blind, in a 2:1:1:2 ratio to placebo or BI 655064 120 mg, 180 mg or 240 mg, and received a weekly loading dose for the first 3 weeks, followed by dosing every 2 weeks for the 120 and 180 mg doses, and weekly (120 mg) for the 240 mg group. Key inclusion criteria included an active ISN/RPS class III or IV (±V) renal biopsy within 3 months prior to screening and a screening protein/creatinine ratio of ≥1 mg/mg. Randomisation was stratified based on race (Asian vs non-Asian) and screening protein/creatine (UP/UC) ratio (Results:The placebo response in this trial was higher than expected (48.3%; Table 1); none of theBI 655064 doses increased rates of CRR at Week 52 compared with placebo. However, CRR at Week 52 based on creatinine-adjusted proteinuria, assessed using spot urine, showed a better response in the 180 mg group (50%) vs placebo (42.5%), and the 180 mg dose showed a greater change from baseline over time vs placebo from Week 4. Time to CRR was shorter in the 180 mg group (17.3 weeks) vs placebo (20.4 weeks). The 180 mg group also showed improvement vs placebo in total SLEDAI (SELENA) and its subscores.The unexpected high placebo response prompted a post hoc analysis evaluating confirmed CRR (cCRR), whereby confirmation of the endpoint was required at both Weeks 46 (penultimate visit on treatment) and 52. A 15.2% higher cCRR in the 180 mg group (44.3%) vs placebo (29.1%) was observed (p=0.26).While based on a small sample size, there were more reports of infection-related severe and serious adverse events and neutropenia in the 240 mg group compared with placebo. Of note, in those who experienced neutropenia, a clinical impact (e.g. increase in infections) was not established. Aside from these observations, safety data were comparable across treatment groups.Larger decreases from baseline were observed in the percentage of CD27−IgD−CD95+, CD27−IgD+CD95+, CD27+IgD+CD95+ and CD27+IgD−CD95+ B-cell subsets in the 180 and 240 mg groups compared with placebo.Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were detected in five patients treated with BI 655054, all at low titre, and in one who received placebo; ADAs had no impact on pharmacokinetics or safety.Conclusion:The trial did not meet its primary CRR endpoint. However, when confirmation of CRR was required at both Weeks 46 and 52, the resultant decrease in the placebo response generated an effect size of 15.2% and 9.1% in favour of 180 mg and 240 mg BI 655064, respectively.Table 1.Efficacy endpoints at Week 52Placebo (n=40)BI 655064120 mg (n=21)180 mg (n=20)240 mg (n=40)Observed CRR, n208918Adjusted* CRR, %48.338.34544.6Observed cCRR, n135916Adjusted* cCRR, %29.122.544.338.2Mean change from baseline in SLEDAITotal score−6.5−6.1−9.7−8.2Non-renal score−1.4−3.0−2.8−3.1Renal score−5.1−3.7−6.8−5.0Clinical score−5.7−3.9−7.9−6.5CRR based on 24 h proteinuria; cCRR based on UP/UC (spot urine) at Weeks 46 and 52. *Logistic regression model including treatment and the covariates race and proteinuria at screening.Disclosure of Interests:David Jayne Consultant of: DRJ has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, Novartis, and Roche, Juergen Steffgen Employee of: JS is employed by Boehringer Ingelheim., Juanita Romero-Diaz Consultant of: JRD has received research consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hirofumi Amano Grant/research support from: HA has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Kajohnsak Noppakun Consultant of: KN has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Jansen, AstraZeneca, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Abbott, Sanofi and Novo Nordisk, Grant/research support from: KN has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, Visterra Inc., Kalbe Genexine Biologics, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Omeros Corporation., Harold Michael Gomez Speakers bureau: HMG has received speaker’s fees for Pfizer, MSD, Unilab, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd, and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rhona Recto: None declared, Valérie Belsack Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Nora Fagan Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Steven Padula Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ivette Revollo Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Jing Wu Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Sudha Visvanathan Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Richard Furie Consultant of: RF has received research consulting fees, Grant/research support from: RF has received clinical trial support

Objective: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) frailty index (FI) has been shown to predict mortality, but its association with other important outcomes is unknown. We examined the association of baseline SLICC FI values with damage accrual in the SLICC inception cohort. Methods: The baseline visit was defined as the first visit at which both organ damage (SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI]) and health-related quality of life (Short Form 36) were assessed. Baseline SLICC FI scores were calculated. Damage accrual was measured by the increase in SDI between the baseline assessment and the last study visit. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to estimate the association between baseline SLICC FI values and the rate of increase in the SDI during follow-up, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: The 1,549 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients eligible for this analysis were mostly female (88.7%) with a mean ± SD age of 35.7 ± 13.3 years and a median disease duration of 1.2 years (interquartile range 0.9–1.5 years) at baseline. The mean ± SD baseline SLICC FI was 0.17 ± 0.08. Over a mean ± SD follow-up of 7.2 ± 3.7 years, 653 patients (42.2%) had an increase in SDI. Higher baseline SLICC FI values (per 0.05 increase) were associated with higher rates of increase in the SDI during follow-up (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.19 [95% confidence interval 1.13–1.25]), after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity/region, education, baseline SLE Disease Activity Index 2000, baseline SDI, and baseline use of glucocorticoids, antimalarials, and immunosuppressive agents. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the SLICC FI predicts damage accrual in incident SLE, which further supports the SLICC FI as a valid health measure in SLE.

Background Supported by both the ACR and EULAR, the EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria for SLE employ positive ANA (ever) as an entry criterion and use a weighted scheme with values ranging from 2 to 10, for a classification cut-off of 10. Criteria items are attributed to SLE only if there is no more likely alternative diagnosis in the individual patients. Items are organized in domains, and only the highest ranking item within a domain is counted. These criteria have been validated in a cohort of 696 SLE patients and 574 non-SLE patients from a total of 21 centers, reaching an overall sensitivity of 96.1% and a specificity of 93.4%. To at least estimate the performance in groups underrepresented in the validation cohort of this transatlantic project, we analyzed this cohort for patient subsets with regard to sex, ethnicity, and disease duration. Methods The full EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria validation cohort was analyzed for female (n=1,098) and male (n=172) patients, Asian (n=118), Black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and White (n=941) patients, and patients with an SLE duration of less than 1 year (n=34), one to less than 3 years (n=196), 3 to less than 5 years (n=157), and 5 or more years (n=879). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, the SLICC 2012 criteria and the ACR 1997 criteria each. Results As shown in table 1, most of the point estimates for sensitivity and specificity in subsets lay within the 95% confidence intervals of the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria validation. In particular, sensitivity and specificity for all ethnic groups were within the confidence intervals or even higher. Formally, the sensitivity was slightly lower for male patients, corresponding to a higher specificity, but the male 95% confidence intervals (0.86–0.98 for sensitivity, 0.90–0.99 for specificity) overlapped. While sensitivity appeared independent of disease duration from year 1 on, sensitivity was only 89% in the first year of disease, identical to the SLICC criteria (89%) and numerically higher than the ACR criteria (56%), but all confidence intervals overlapped. Conclusion While not all subgroups of SLE patients in the validation cohort are of adequate size to fully explore the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria in the respective subsets, the point estimates of sensitivity and specificity suggest that the new criteria perform at least reasonably well in all ethnic groups, in men and in early disease. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity should be independently validated in larger groups of Asian, Black and Hispanic patients, male patients and in early disease.