Search

ImportanceDysregulated metabolism is a hallmark of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Glutaminase is a key enzyme that fuels tumor growth by converting glutamine to glutamate. Telaglenastat is an investigational, first-in-class, selective, oral glutaminase inhibitor that blocks glutamine utilization and downstream pathways. Preclinically, telaglenastat synergized with cabozantinib, a VEGFR2/MET/AXL inhibitor, in RCC models.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of telaglenastat plus cabozantinib (Tela + Cabo) vs placebo plus cabozantinib (Pbo + Cabo).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCANTATA was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pivotal trial conducted at sites in the US, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Eligible patients had metastatic clear-cell RCC following progression on 1 to 2 prior lines of therapy, including 1 or more antiangiogenic therapies or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The data cutoff date was August 31, 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to February 2021.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral cabozantinib (60 mg daily) with either telaglenastat (800 mg twice daily) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was progression-free survival (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) assessed by blinded independent radiology review.ResultsA total of 444 patients were randomized: 221 to Tela + Cabo (median [range] age, 61 [21-81] years; 47 [21%] women and 174 [79%] men) and 223 to Pbo + Cabo (median [range] age, 62 [29-83] years; 68 [30%] women and 155 [70%] men). A total of 276 (62%) patients had received prior immune checkpoint inhibitors, including 128 with prior nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 93 of whom had not received prior antiangiogenic therapy. Median progression-free survival was 9.2 months for Tela + Cabo vs 9.3 months for Pbo + Cabo (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.21; P = .65). Overall response rates were 31% (69 of 221) with Tela + Cabo vs 28% (62 of 223) with Pbo + Cabo. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were similar between arms. Grade 3 to 4 TEAEs occurred in 160 patients (71%) with Tela + Cabo and 172 patients (79%) with Pbo + Cabo and included hypertension (38 patients [17%] vs 40 patients [18%]) and diarrhea (34 patients [15%] vs 29 patients [13%]). Cabozantinib was discontinued due to AEs in 23 patients (10%) receiving Tela + Cabo and 33 patients (15%) receiving Pbo + Cabo.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, telaglenastat did not improve the efficacy of cabozantinib in metastatic RCC. Tela + Cabo was well tolerated with AEs consistent with the known risks of both agents.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03428217

List of primary GBM cell lines used in this study.

Analysis of differentiation genes after long term dacomitinib treatment.

Analysis of stemmness genes after long term dacomitinib treatment.

Effect of dacomitinib in the in vivo growth of GBMs.

Analysis of EGFR signaling after long term dacomitinib treatment.

Analysis of stemmness genes after 5 days of dacomitinib treatment.

Detailed description of methods used in this study.

Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is a severe complication in cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common types of malignant intracranial tumors and are reported in approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancers. The recent increase in incidence of BMs is due to several factors including better diagnostic assessments and the development of improved systemic therapies that have lower activity on the CNS. However, newer systemic therapies are being developed that can cross the blood–brain barrier giving us additional tools to treat BMs. The guidelines presented here focus on the efficacy of new targeted systemic therapies and immunotherapies on CNS BMs from breast, melanoma, and lung cancers.

List of GBM cell lines

Participation of EGFR mutations in the formation of glioma-derived pericytes.

Supplementary Table from Infigratinib in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas and FGFR Alterations: A Multicenter Phase II Study

Supplementary Materials and Methods

Purpose:FGFR genomic alterations (amplification, mutations, and/or fusions) occur in ∼8% of gliomas, particularly FGFR1 and FGFR3. We conducted a multicenter open-label, single-arm, phase II study of a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor, infigratinib (BGJ398), in patients with FGFR-altered recurrent gliomas.Patients and Methods:Adults with recurrent/progressive gliomas harboring FGFR alterations received oral infigratinib 125 mg on days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on available pretreatment archival tissue to explore additional molecular correlations with efficacy.Results:Among 26 patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 16.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0–32.5], median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.1–2.8), and objective response rate was 3.8%. However, 4 patients had durable disease control lasting longer than 1 year. Among these, 3 had tumors harboring activating point mutations at analogous positions of FGFR1 (K656E; n = 2) or FGFR3 (K650E; n = 1) in pretreatment tissue; an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion was detected in the other. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event (all-grade, 76.9%; grade 3, 3.8%) and is a known on-target toxicity of FGFR inhibitors.Conclusions:FGFR inhibitor monotherapy with infigratinib had limited efficacy in a population of patients with recurrent gliomas and different FGFR genetic alterations, but durable disease control lasting more than 1 year was observed in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1 or FGFR3 point mutations or FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. A follow-up study with refined biomarker inclusion criteria and centralized FGFR testing is warranted.

Supplementary Figure from Infigratinib in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas and FGFR Alterations: A Multicenter Phase II Study

The extraordinary plasticity of glioma cells allows them to contribute to different cellular compartments in tumor vessels, reinforcing the vascular architecture. It was recently revealed that targeting glioma-derived pericytes, which represent a big percentage of the mural cell population in aggressive tumors, increases the permeability of the vessels and improves the efficiency of chemotherapy. However, the molecular determinants of this transdifferentiation process have not been elucidated. Here we show that mutations in EGFR stimulate the capacity of glioma cells to function as pericytes in a BMX- (bone marrow and X-linked) and SOX9-dependent manner. Subsequent activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in the vessel walls of EGFR-mutant gliomas stabilized the vasculature and facilitated the recruitment of immune cells. These changes in the tumor microenvironment conferred a growth advantage to the tumors but also rendered them sensitive to pericyte-targeting molecules such as ibrutinib or sunitinib. In the absence of EGFR mutations, high-grade gliomas were enriched in blood vessels, but showed a highly disrupted blood–brain barrier due to the decreased BMX/SOX9 activation and pericyte coverage, which led to poor oxygenation, necrosis, and hypoxia. Overall, these findings identify EGFR mutations as key regulators of the glioma-to-pericyte transdifferentiation, highlighting the intricate relationship between the tumor cells and their vascular and immune milieu. Our results lay the foundations for a vascular-dependent stratification of gliomas and suggest different therapeutic vulnerabilities determined by the genetic status of EGFR.Significance:This study identifies the EGFR-related mechanisms that govern the capacity of glioma cells to transdifferentiate into pericytes, regulating the vascular and immune phenotypes of the tumors.

Background The bromodomain and extraterminal protein (BET) inhibitor trotabresib has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including high-grade gliomas. CC-90010-GBM-001 (NCT04047303) is a phase I study investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and CNS penetration of trotabresib in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas scheduled for salvage resection. Methods Patients received trotabresib 30 mg/day on days 1–4 before surgery, followed by maintenance trotabresib 45 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off after surgery. Primary endpoints were plasma pharmacokinetics and trotabresib concentrations in resected tissue. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity. Results Twenty patients received preoperative trotabresib and underwent resection with no delays or cancelations of surgery; 16 patients received maintenance trotabresib after recovery from surgery. Trotabresib plasma pharmacokinetics were consistent with previous data. Mean trotabresib brain tumor tissue:plasma ratio was 0.84 (estimated unbound partition coefficient [KPUU] 0.37), and modulation of pharmacodynamic markers was observed in blood and brain tumor tissue. Trotabresib was well tolerated; the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event during maintenance treatment was thrombocytopenia (5/16 patients). Six-month progression-free survival was 12%. Two patients remain on treatment with stable disease at cycles 25 and 30. Conclusions Trotabresib penetrates the blood–brain-tumor barrier in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma and demonstrates target engagement in resected tumor tissue. Plasma pharmacokinetics, blood pharmacodynamics, and safety were comparable with previous results for trotabresib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Investigation of adjuvant trotabresib + temozolomide and concomitant trotabresib + temozolomide + radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is ongoing (NCT04324840).

Purpose: FGFR genomic alterations (amplification, mutations, and/or fusions) occur in ∼8% of gliomas, particularly FGFR1 and FGFR3. We conducted a multicenter open-label, single-arm, phase II study of a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor, infigratinib (BGJ398), in patients with FGFR-altered recurrent gliomas. Patients and Methods: Adults with recurrent/progressive gliomas harboring FGFR alterations received oral infigratinib 125 mg on days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on available pretreatment archival tissue to explore additional molecular correlations with efficacy. Results: Among 26 patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 16.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0–32.5], median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.1–2.8), and objective response rate was 3.8%. However, 4 patients had durable disease control lasting longer than 1 year. Among these, 3 had tumors harboring activating point mutations at analogous positions of FGFR1 (K656E; n = 2) or FGFR3 (K650E; n = 1) in pretreatment tissue; an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion was detected in the other. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event (all-grade, 76.9%; grade 3, 3.8%) and is a known on-target toxicity of FGFR inhibitors. Conclusions: FGFR inhibitor monotherapy with infigratinib had limited efficacy in a population of patients with recurrent gliomas and different FGFR genetic alterations, but durable disease control lasting more than 1 year was observed in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1 or FGFR3 point mutations or FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. A follow-up study with refined biomarker inclusion criteria and centralized FGFR testing is warranted.

Background No systemic treatment has been established for meningioma progressing after local therapies. Methods This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study included adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma. Patients were 2:1 randomly assigned to intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), objective radiological response, safety, quality of life (QoL) assessment using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, and we performed tissue-based exploratory molecular analyses. Results Ninety patients were randomized (n = 29 in LOC, n = 61 in trabectedin arm). With 71 events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00-2.03; P = .294) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%), respectively. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.76; P = .94). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 44.4% of patients in the LOC and 59% of patients in the trabectedin arm. Enrolled patients had impeded global QoL and overall functionality and high fatigue before initiation of systemic therapy. DNA methylation class, performance status, presence of a relevant co-morbidity, steroid use, and right hemisphere involvement at baseline were independently associated with OS. Conclusions Trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with higher toxicity than LOC treatment in patients with non-benign meningioma. Tumor DNA methylation class is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

Simple Summary Most patients with glioblastoma, the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults, develop resistance to standard first-line treatment combining temozolomide and radiotherapy. Signaling through the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET) and the midkine (ALK ligand) promotes gliomagenesis and glioma stem cell maintenance, contributing to the resistance of glioma cells to anticancer therapies. This trial reports for the first time that the addition of crizotinib, an ALK, ROS1, and c-MET inhibitor, to standard RT and TMZ is safe and resulted in a promising efficacy for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. Background: MET-signaling and midkine (ALK ligand) promote glioma cell maintenance and resistance against anticancer therapies. ALK and c-MET inhibition with crizotinib have a preclinical therapeutic rationale to be tested in newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: Eligible patients received crizotinib with standard radiotherapy (RT)/temozolomide (TMZ) followed by maintenance with crizotinib. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in a 3 + 3 dose escalation (DE) strategy and safety evaluation in the expansion cohort (EC). Secondary objectives included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and exploratory biomarker analysis. Results: The study enrolled 38 patients. The median age was 52 years (33-76), 44% were male, 44% were MGMT methylated, and three patients had IDH1/2 mutation. In DE, DLTs were reported in 1/6 in the second cohort (250 mg/QD), declaring 250 mg/QD of crizotinib as the RP2D for the EC. In the EC, 9/25 patients (32%) presented grade >= 3 adverse events. The median follow up was 18.7 months (m) and the median PFS was 10.7 m (95% CI, 7.7-13.8), with a 6 m PFS and 12 m PFS of 71.5% and 38.8%, respectively. At the time of this analysis, 1 died without progression and 24 had progressed. The median OS was 22.6 m (95% CI, 14.1-31.1) with a 24 m OS of 44.5%. Molecular biomarkers showed no correlation with efficacy. Conclusions: The addition of crizotinib to standard RT and TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM was safe and the efficacy was encouraging, warranting prospective validation in an adequately powered, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of brain metastasis involves high morbidity and mortality and remains an unmet clinical need in spite of being the most common tumor in the brain. Exclusion of these cancer patients from clinical trials is a major cause of their limited therapeutic options. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report a novel drug-screening platform (METPlatform) based on organotypic cultures which allows identifying effective anti-metastasis agents in the presence of the organ microenvironment. We have applied this approach to clinically relevant stages of brain metastasis using both experimental models and human tumor tissue (by performing patient-derived organotypic cultures - PDOCs -). We have also used METPlatform to perform unbiased proteomics of brain metastases in situ to identify potential novel mediators of this disease and explore resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy. Finally, we have exploited METPlatform as “avatars” to predict response to therapy in patients with primary brain tumors. RESULTS We identified heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) as a promising therapeutic target for brain metastasis. DEBIO-0932, a blood-brain barrier permeable HSP90 inhibitor, shows high potency against mouse and human brain metastases from different primary origin and oncogenomic profile at clinically relevant stages of the disease, including a novel model of local relapse after neurosurgery. Furthermore, in situ proteomic analysis of brain metastases treated with the chaperone inhibitor revealed non-canonical clients of HSP90 as potential novel mediators of brain metastasis and actionable mechanisms of resistance driven by autophagy. Combined therapy using HSP90 and autophagy inhibitors showed synergistic effects compared to sublethal concentrations of each monotherapy, demonstrating the potential of METPlatform to design and test rationale combination therapies to target metastasis more effectively. Finally, we show that brain tumor PDOCs predict the response of the corresponding patient to standard of care, thus proving the potential of METPlatform for improving personalized care in cancer. CONCLUSION Our work validates METPlatform as a potent resource for metastasis research integrating drug-screening and unbiased omic approaches that is fully compatible with human samples and questions the rationale of excluding patients with brain metastasis from clinical trials. We envision that METPlatform will be established as a clinically relevant strategy to personalize the management of metastatic disease in the brain and elsewhere.

Background Depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) is a tumor-specific antibody–drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide or as a single agent in a randomized controlled phase II trial in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma. Methods Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after chemo-irradiation with temozolomide. Patients were randomized to either Depatux-M 1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or this treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or either lomustine or temozolomide. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. Results Two hundred sixty patients were randomized. In the primary efficacy analysis with 199 events (median follow-up 15.0 mo), the hazard ratio (HR) for the combination arm compared with the control arm was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, 1.02; P = 0.062). The efficacy of Depatux-M monotherapy was comparable to that of the control arm (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.48; P = 0.83). The most frequent toxicity in Depatux-M treated patients was a reversible corneal epitheliopathy, occurring as grades 3–4 adverse events in 25–30% of patients. In the long-term follow-up analysis with median follow-up of 28.7 months, the HR for the comparison of the combination arm versus the control arm was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.48, 0.93). Conclusion This trial suggests a possible role for the use of Depatux-M in combination with temozolomide in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma, especially in patients relapsing well after the end of first-line adjuvant temozolomide treatment. (NCT02343406)

Background Precision medicine trials targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma patients require selection for EGFR-amplified tumors. However, there is currently no gold standard in determining the amplification status of EGFR or variant III (EGFRvIII) expression. Here, we aimed to determine which technique and which cutoffs are suitable to determine EGFR amplification status. Methods We compared fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time quantitative (RT-q)PCR data from patients screened for trial inclusion into the Intellance 2 clinical trial, with data from a panel-based next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (both DNA and RNA). Results By using data from >1000 samples, we show that at least 50% of EGFR amplified nuclei should be present to define EGFR gene amplification by FISH. Gene amplification (as determined by FISH) correlates with EGFR expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) with receiver operating characteristics analysis showing an area under the curve of up to 0.902. EGFR expression as assessed by RT-qPCR therefore may function as a surrogate marker for EGFR amplification. Our NGS data show that EGFR copy numbers can strongly vary between tumors, with levels ranging from 2 to more than 100 copies per cell. Levels exceeding 5 gene copies can be used to define EGFR-amplification by NGS; below this level, FISH detects very few (if any) EGFR amplified nuclei and none of the samples express EGFRvIII. Conclusion Our data from central laboratories and diagnostic sequencing facilities, using material from patients eligible for clinical trial inclusion, help define the optimal cutoff for various techniques to determine EGFR amplification for diagnostic purposes.

Background This study aimed to characterize the neurotoxicity of three different regimens of nab-paclitaxel compared with a standard regimen of solvent-based (sb) paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer based on the Total Neurotoxicity Score (TNS), a tool specifically developed to assess chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. Materials and Methods This was a randomized, open-label study testing 4-week cycles of 80 mg/m2 sb-paclitaxel (PACL80/w) on days 1, 8, and 15; 100 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 (NAB100/w); 150 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 (NAB150/w); and 150 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 15 (NAB150/2w). In addition to the TNS, neuropathy was assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE). Tumor response and quality of life were also evaluated. Results Neurotoxicity, as evaluated by the TNS, did not significantly differ between the sb-paclitaxel group and any of the nab-paclitaxel groups. The frequency of (any grade) polyneuropathy, as measured by the NCI-CTCAE, was lower in the PACL80/w (n = 7, 50%) and NAB150/2w (n = 10, 62.5%) groups than in the NAB100/w (n = 13, 81.3%) or NAB150/w (n = 11, 78.6%) group. Although the differences were not statistically significant, compared with the other groups, in the NAB150/w group, the time to occurrence of grade ≥2 polyneuropathy was shorter, and the median time to recovery from grade ≥2 polyneuropathy was longer. Dose delays and reductions due to neurotoxicity and impact of neurotoxicity on the patients’ experience of symptoms and functional limitations was greater with NAB150/w. Among the seven polymorphisms selected for genotyping, the variant alleles of EPHA5-rs7349683, EPHA6-rs301927, and EPHA8-rs209709 were associated with an increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy. Conclusion The results of this exploratory study showed that, regardless of the dose, nab-paclitaxel did not differ from sb-paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity as evaluated with the TNS. However, results from NCI-CTCAE, dose delays and reductions, and functional tools consistently indicate that NAB150/w regimen is associated with a greater risk of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Thus, our results question the superiority of the TNS over NCI-CTCAE for evaluating chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and guiding treatment decisions in this context. The selection of the nab-paclitaxel regimen should be individualized based on the clinical context and potentially supported by pharmacogenetic analysis. Registry: EudraCT, 2012-002361-36; NCT01763710 Implications for Practice The results of this study call into question the superiority of the Total Neurotoxicity Score over the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for evaluating chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and guiding treatment decisions in this context and suggest that a regimen of 150 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel administered on days 1, 8, and 15 is associated with a greater risk of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and hematological toxicity compared with other lower-dose nab-paclitaxel regimens or a standard regimen of solvent-based paclitaxel. The selection of the nab-paclitaxel regimen should be individualized based on the clinical context and could benefit from pharmacogenetics analysis.

Background and purpose Our objectives were: (1) compare dynamic susceptibility-weighted (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) permeability parameters, (2) evaluate diagnostic accuracy of DSC and DCE discriminating high- and low-grade tumors, (3) analyze relationship of permeability parameters with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and (4) assess differences in high-grade tumors classified according to molecular biomarkers. Materials and methods 49 patients with histologically proved diffuse gliomas underwent DSC and DCE imaging. Parametric maps of cerebral blood volume (CBV), CBV-leakage corrected, volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (EES) (Ve), fractional blood plasma volume (Vp) and rate constant between EES and blood plasma (Kep) were calculated. High-grade gliomas were also classified according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) and O6-methylguanine-dna-methyltransferase promoter methylation (MGMT) status. Results There is correlation between parameters leakage, Ktrans and Vp. ROC curve analysis showed significance in both Ktrans and Ve for glioma grading. Threshold value of 0.075 for Ve generated the best combination of sensitivity (80%) and specificity (75%) in tumor gradation. Leakage was the only permeability parameter related to OS (P = 0.006) and PFS (0.012); with prolonged survival for leakage values lower than 1.2. IDH-mutated high-grade tumors showed lower leakage and Ktrans values. High-grade tumors with loss of ATRX presented lower leakage and Vp values. Conclusions Both DSC and DCE permeability parameters serve as non-invasive method for glioma grading. Leakage was the unique permeability parameter related to survival and the best discriminating high-grade gliomas classified according to IDH and ATRX status.

Exclusion of brain metastases from clinical trials is a major cause of the limited therapeutic options for this growing population of cancer patients. Here, we report a medium-throughput drug-screening platform (METPlatform) based on organotypic cultures that allows to evaluate inhibitors against metastases growing in situ. By applying this approach to brain metastasis, we identified several hits from a library of FDA approved inhibitors and others being tested in clinical trials. A blood-brain barrier permeable HSP90 inhibitor showed high potency against mouse and human brain metastases at clinically relevant stages of the disease, including a novel model of local relapse after neurosurgery. Furthermore, in situ proteomic analysis applied to organotypic cultures with metastases treated with the chaperone inhibitor revealed novel biomarkers in human brain metastasis and actionable mechanisms of resistance. Our work validates METPlatform as a potent resource for metastasis research integrating drug-screening and unbiased omic approaches that is fully compatible with human samples. We envision that METPlatform could be established as a clinically relevant strategy to personalize the management of metastatic disease in the brain and elsewhere.SummarySystemic spread of cancer continues to be the key aspect associated with lethality. In this publication, Zhu et al. describes a drug-screening platform specifically designed to study vulnerabilities of metastasis when colonizing secondary organs and demonstrates its value in difficult-to-treat brain metastasis using new models and patient-derived samples.

Background Giant cell glioblastoma (gcGBM) is a rare morphological variant of IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) GBM that occurs in young adults and have a slightly better prognosis than “classic” IDHwt GBM. Methods We studied 36 GBMs, 14 with a histopathological diagnosis of gcGBM and 22 with a giant cell component. We analyzed the genetic profile of the most frequently mutated genes in gliomas and assessed the tumor mutation load (TML) by gene-targeted next-generation sequencing. We validated our findings using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. Results p53 was altered by gene mutation or protein overexpression in all cases, while driver IDH1, IDH2, BRAF, or H3F3A mutations were infrequent or absent. Compared to IDHwt GBMs, gcGBMs had a significant higher frequency of TP53, ATRX, RB1, and NF1 mutations, while lower frequency of EGFR amplification, CDKN2A deletion, and TERT promoter mutation. Almost all tumors had low TML values. The high TML observed in only 2 tumors was consistent with POLE and MSH2 mutations. In the histopathological review of TCGA IDHwt, TP53-mutant tumors identified giant cells in 37% of the cases. Considering our series and that of the TCGA, patients with TP53-mutant gcGBMs had better overall survival than those with TP53wt GBMs (log-rank test, P Conclusions gcGBMs have molecular features that contrast to “classic” IDHwt GBMs: unusually frequent ATRX mutations and few EGFR amplifications and CDKN2A deletions, especially in tumors with a high number of giant cells. TML is frequently low, although exceptional high TML suggests a potential for immune checkpoint therapy in some cases, which may be relevant for personalized medicine.

BackgroundThe randomized phase II INTELLANCE-2/EORTC_1410 trial on EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastomas showed a trend towards improved overall survival when patients were treated with depatux-m plus temozolomide compared with the control arm of alkylating chemotherapy only. We here performed translational research on material derived from this clinical trial to identify patients that benefit from this treatment.MethodsTargeted DNA-sequencing and whole transcriptome analysis was performed on clinical trial samples. High-throughput, high-content imaging analysis was done to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the survival benefit.ResultsWe first define the tumor genomic landscape in this well-annotated patient population. We find that tumors harboring EGFR single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) have improved outcome in the depatux-m + TMZ combination arm. Such SNVs are common to the extracellular domain of the receptor and functionally result in a receptor that is hypersensitive to low-affinity EGFR ligands. These hypersensitizing SNVs and the ligand-independent EGFRvIII variant are inversely correlated, indicating two distinct modes of evolution to increase EGFR signaling in glioblastomas. Ligand hypersensitivity can explain the therapeutic efficacy of depatux-m as increased ligand-induced activation will result in increased exposure of the epitope to the antibody–drug conjugate. We also identified tumors harboring mutations sensitive to “classical” EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, providing a potential alternative treatment strategy.ConclusionsThese data can help guide treatment for recurrent glioblastoma patients and increase our understanding into the molecular mechanisms underlying EGFR signaling in these tumors.

Importance Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported. Objective To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). TheMGMTpromoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30);P = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs. Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02017717

Inhibidor de BET; Limfoma no Hodgkin; Tumors sòlids Inhibidor de BET; Linfoma no Hodgkin; Tumores sólidos BET inhibitor; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; Solid tumors Background Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of genes involved in oncogenesis. CC-90010 is a novel, oral, reversible, small-molecule BET inhibitor. Patients and methods CC-90010-ST-001 (NCT03220347; 2015-004371-79) is a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of CC-90010 in patients with advanced or unresectable solid tumors and relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report results from the dose escalation phase, which explored 11 dose levels and four dosing schedules, two weekly (2 days on/5 days off; 3 days on/4 days off), one biweekly (3 days on/11 days off), and one monthly (4 days on/24 days off). The primary objectives were to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule. Secondary objectives were to evaluate signals of early antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results This study enrolled 69 patients, 67 with solid tumors and two with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The median age was 57 years (range, 21–80) and the median number of prior regimens was four (range, 1–9). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly mild and manageable; grade 3/4 TRAEs reported in more than two patients were thrombocytopenia (13%), anemia, and fatigue (4% each). Six patients had dose-limiting toxicities. MTDs were 15 mg (2 days on/5 days off), 30 mg (3 days on/11 days off), and 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). The RP2D and schedule selected for expansion was 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). As of 8 October 2019, one patient with grade 2 astrocytoma achieved a complete response, one patient with endometrial carcinoma had a partial response, and six patients had prolonged stable disease ≥11 months. Conclusions CC-90010 is well tolerated, with single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced solid tumors. This work was supported by Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA. (no grant number).

Background Standard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome. Methods Glioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02209948). Results From August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (P Conclusions Continuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS. Key Points 1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS. 2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset. 3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. It has been proposed that the presence within these tumors of a population of cells with stem-like features termed Glioma Initiating Cells (GICs) is responsible for the relapses that take place in the patients with this disease. Targeting this cell population is therefore an issue of great therapeutic interest in neuro-oncology. We had previously found that the neurotrophic factor MIDKINE (MDK) promotes resistance to glioma cell death. The main objective of this work is therefore investigating the role of MDK in the regulation of GICs. Methods: Assays of gene and protein expression, self-renewal capacity, autophagy and apoptosis in cultures of GICs derived from GBM samples subjected to different treatments. Analysis of the growth of GICs-derived xenografts generated in mice upon blockade of the MDK and its receptor the ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) upon exposure to different treatments. Results: Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of MDK or ALK decreases the self-renewal and tumorigenic capacity of GICs via the autophagic degradation of the transcription factor SOX9. Blockade of the MDK/ALK axis in combination with temozolomide depletes the population of GICs in vitro and has a potent anticancer activity in xenografts derived from GICs. Conclusions: The MDK/ALK axis regulates the self-renewal capacity of GICs by controlling the autophagic degradation of the transcription factor SOX9. Inhibition of the MDK/ALK axis may be a therapeutic strategy to target GICs in GBM patients. This work has been funded by the PI18/00442 grant integrated into the State Plan for R & D + I 2017-2020 and funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and confounded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), “A way to make Europe” and by grants from ISCIII and ERDF, a way to make Europe (PS09/01401; PI12/02248 and PI15/00339 to GV, PI16/01580 to AM, PI16/01278 to JMS) by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grant SAF2015-65175-R/ERDF to PSG), by Fundación Mutua Madrileña (AP101042012 to GV), “Fundació La Marató de TV3” (20134031 to GV), Voices Against Brain Cancer (US) (to GV), and donations by The Medical Cannabis Bike Tour Foundation (The Netherlands to GV) and Jeff Ditchfield (to GV). G Velasco's group is part of the COST Action CA15138 (Transautophagy). Israel López-Valero was supported by a predoctoral P-FIS contract from ISCIII, Cristina Sáiz was supported by a “Juan de la Cierva formación” contract of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Ander Matheu was recipient of a Miguel Servet contract (CP16/00039) from ISCIII. Work in JM Sepulveda group is supported by a grant from “Asociación Española contra el Cancer” (AECC) (GCTRA16015SEDA). Part of the work at G Velasco laboratory was funded by LYRAMID and Pfizer. Sí

Purpose To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or identify the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) for combined INC280 and buparlisib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma with homozygous phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) deletion, mutation or protein loss. Methods This multicenter, open-label, Phase Ib/II study included adult patients with glioblastoma with mesenchymal-epithelial transcription factor (c-Met) amplification. In Phase Ib, patients received INC280 as capsules or tablets in combination with buparlisib. In Phase II, patients received INC280 only. Response was assessed centrally using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology response criteria for high-grade gliomas. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded. Results 33 patients entered Phase Ib, 32 with altered PTEN. RP2D was not declared due to potential drug–drug interactions, which may have resulted in lack of efficacy; thus, Phase II, including 10 patients, was continued with INC280 monotherapy only. Best response was stable disease in 30% of patients. In the selected patient population, enrollment was halted due to limited activity with INC280 monotherapy. In Phase Ib, the most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (36.4%), nausea (30.3%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (30.3%). MTD was identified at INC280 Tab 300 mg twice daily + buparlisib 80 mg once daily. In Phase II, the most common AEs were headache (40.0%), constipation (30.0%), fatigue (30.0%) and increased lipase (30.0%). Conclusion The combination of INC280/buparlisib resulted in no clear activity in patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma. More stringent molecular selection strategies might produce better outcomes. Trial registration: NCT01870726.

Introduction Although increasing numbers of therapies with proven survival benefits have become available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), including radium-223, there is still a need for reliable biomarkers that provide information about clinically meaningful outcomes and treatment responses. Materials and Methods This study was a translational study that was conducted prospectively by the Spanish Oncology Genito-Urinary Group and included 45 patients with histologically confirmed mCRPC who were treated with radium-223. The primary response outcome was defined by a decline in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of > 50% from baseline or a CTC count of ≤ 5 cells/7.5 mL at cycle 3 of radium-223. We also assessed response according to prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase levels. CTCs were evaluated as prognostic factor for treatment completion with radium-223 treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were calculated for the global population and were correlated with biomarker response outcomes. Results Significantly, more patients with baseline CTC counts ≤ 5/7.5 mL, which are indicative of better prognoses, completed the 6 injections of therapy than those with CTC counts > 5 (16/22; 73% vs. 6/20; 30%, respectively; P = .012). The median overall survival was 16 months. Survival was significantly decreased in patients with baseline CTC counts > 5 cells/7.5 mL (7 months; P = .026) and baseline alkaline phosphatase levels ≥ 220 U/L (8 months; P = .028). Conclusions CTCs hold significant promise as a prognostic factor for survival and completing treatment prior to the initiation of bone-targeted radium-223 therapy. These findings may help to guide the use of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive form of brain cancer. These features are explained at least in part by the high resistance exhibited by these tumors to current anticancer therapies. Thus, the development of novel therapeutic approaches is urgently needed to improve the survival of the patients suffering this devastating disease. Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the major active ingredient of marijuana), and other cannabinoids have been shown to exert antitumoral actions in animal models of cancer, including glioma. The mechanism of these anticancer actions relies, at least in part, on the ability of these compounds to stimulate autophagy-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells. Previous observations from our group demonstrated that local administration of THC (or of THC + CBD at a 1:1 ratio, a mixture that resembles the composition of the cannabinoid-based medicine Sativex®) in combination with Temozolomide, the benchmark agent for the treatment of GBM, synergistically reduces the growth of glioma xenografts. With the aim of optimizing the possible clinical utilization of cannabinoids in anti-GBM therapies, in this work we explored the anticancer efficacy of the systemic administration of cannabinoids in combination with TMZ in preclinical models of glioma. Our results show that oral administration of Sativex-like extracts (containing THC and CBD at a 1:1 ratio) in combination with TMZ produces a strong antitumoral effect in both subcutaneous and intracranial glioma cell-derived tumor xenografts. In contrast, combined administration of Sativex-like and BCNU (another alkylating agent used for the treatment of GBM which share structural similarities with the TMZ) did not show a stronger effect than individual treatments. Altogether, our findings support the notion that the combined administration of TMZ and oral cannabinoids could be therapeutically exploited for the management of GBM.

The radiological diagnosis of glioma progression is still challenging. A 33-year-old woman diagnosed with a frontal tumor underwent awake craniotomy with total tumor resection. The diagnosis was IDH-mutated diffuse astrocytoma, WHO grade II. The patient did not receive additional radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Periodic MRI scans showed a T2/FLAIR nodular enlargement which appeared de novo and grew slowly and gradually until 4 years post surgery. The patient underwent a second craniotomy to completely resect the T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. In the histological and molecular study of the second resection, no tumor cells were identified. We could hypothesize that the reactive changes favored by surgery could explain the ongoing radiologic findings. .

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant adult primary brain tumor. Despite its high lethality, a small proportion of patients have a relatively long overall survival (OS). Here we report a study of a series of 74 GBM samples from 29 long-term survivors ([LTS] OS ≥36 months) and 45 non-LTS. Using next-generation sequencing, we analyzed genetic alterations in the genes most frequently altered in gliomas. Approximately 20% of LTS had a mutation in the IDH1 or IDH2 (IDH) genes, denoting the relevance of this molecular prognostic factor. A new molecular group of GBMs harbored alterations in ATRX or DAXX genes in the absence of driver IDH or H3F3A mutations. These patients tended to have a slightly better prognosis, to be younger at diagnosis, and to present frontal or temporal tumors, and, morphologically, to present giant tumor cells. A significant fraction of LTS GBM patients had tumors with 1 or more alterations in the relevant GBM signaling pathways (RTK/PI3K, TP53 and RB1). In these patients, the PDGFRA alteration is suggested to be a favorable molecular factor. Our findings here are relevant for developing future targeted therapies and for identifying molecular prognostic factors in GBM patients.

Trotabresib is a potent, reversible oral BETi with antitumor activity in patients with advanced malignancies (Moreno et al. ESMO 2020. Abstract 5270). The CC-90010-GBM-001 study (NCT04047303) enrolled patients with progressive or recurrent astrocytoma or recurrent glioblastoma scheduled for salvage resection. Patients were treated with trotabresib 30 mg daily for 4 days before surgery, then trotabresib 45 mg daily 4 days on/24 days off after recovery. Primary objectives were trotabresib tumor tissue concentration and plasma pharmacokinetics (PK). Secondary and exploratory objectives included safety, antitumor activity, cerebrospinal fluid concentration, and pharmacodynamics (PD). Twenty patients were enrolled; blood PK, blood PD, and tumor PD data were available for 14, 12, and 11 patients, respectively. Geometric mean peak trotabresib plasma concentration on day 4 was 1.92 μM; median time to peak concentration was 1.5 hours. At the time of resection, geometric mean trotabresib concentrations in plasma and brain tumor tissue were 1.01 and 0.68 μM, respectively. Blood CCR1 mRNA was reduced ≥ 50% from baseline after dose 4. Blood HEXIM1 mRNA increased at 72–96 hours following first dose, and at the time of surgery the percentage increase was related to plasma trotabresib concentration. Tumor HEXIM1 RNA increased in 10 of 11 patients. Eighteen patients (90%) had ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Nine patients (45%) had grade 3/4 TRAEs, most frequently thrombocytopenia (5 patients [25%]). Only 1 patient had serious TRAEs (hemiparesis and lethargy). Two patients died of intracranial hemorrhage unrelated to study drug. Of 16 patients evaluable for antitumor response, 7 had stable disease per RANO criteria, with 3 ongoing beyond data cutoff at cycles 4–11. Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.4–3.3). Overall, trotabresib showed good tumor tissue penetration, with PD signals of response, and was well tolerated. A study of trotabresib + temozolomide in first-line glioblastoma is ongoing (NCT04324840).

BACKGROUND Finding effective treatment options for patients with brain metastasis remains an unmet need. Given the limitations imposed by the blood-brain-barrier for systemic approaches, radiotherapy offers a superior ability to access the brain. While clinical practice recently adapted the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), Whole-Brain-Radiotherapy (WBRT) continuous to be an important treatment option, since many patients present with multifocal lesions or bad performance scores, rendering them ineligible for SRS. Unfortunately, overall survival of patients remains unaffected by radiotherapy. Despite this clinical data, the molecular mechanisms that allow metastatic cells to resist radiotherapy in the brain is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS We have applied WBRT to experimental brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma and validated their resistance in vivo. RESULTS An unbiased search to identify potential mediators of resistance identified the S100A9-RAGE-NFκB-JunB pathway. Targeting this pathway genetically reverts the resistance to radiotherapy and increases therapeutic benefits in vivo. In two independent cohorts of brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma patients, levels of S100A9 correlate with the response to radiotherapy, offering a novel approach to stratify patients according to their expected benefit. In order to make this biomarker also available for brain metastasis patients receiving palliative WBRT without preceding surgery, we complemented our tumor-specimen based approach with the less invasive detection of S100A9 from liquid biopsies. Here, serum S100A9 also correlated with a worse response to WBRT in brain metastasis patients. Furthermore, we have validated the use of a blood-brain-barrier permeable RAGE inhibitor to restore radio-sensitivity in experimental brain metastasis models in vivo and in patient-derived organotypic cultures of radio-resistant brain metastasis ex vivo. CONCLUSION We identified S100A9 as a major mediator of radio-resistance in brain metastasis and offer the molecular framework to personalize radiotherapy by exploiting it as a biomarker and as a therapeutic target, thus maximizing the benefits for the patient.

Finding effective treatment options for patients with brain metastasis remains an unmet need. Given the limitations imposed by the blood-brain-barrier for systemic approaches, radiotherapy offers a superior ability to access the brain. While clinical practice recently adapted the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), Whole-Brain-Radiotherapy (WBRT) continuous to be an important treatment option, since many patients present with multifocal lesions or bad performance scores, rendering them ineligible for SRS. Unfortunately, overall survival of patients remains unaffected by radiotherapy. Despite this clinical data, the molecular mechanisms that allow metastatic cells to resist radiotherapy in the brain is unknown. We have applied WBRT to experimental brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma and validated their resistance in vivo. An unbiased search to identify potential mediators of resistance identified the S100A9-RAGE-NFkB-JunB pathway. Targeting this pathway genetically reverts the resistance to radiotherapy and increases therapeutic benefits in vivo. In two independent cohorts of brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma patients, levels of S100A9 correlate with the response to radiotherapy, offering a novel approach to stratify patients according to their expected benefit. In order to make this biomarker also available for brain metastasis patients receiving palliative WBRT without preceding surgery, we complemented our tumor-specimen based approach with the less invasive detection of S100A9 from liquid biopsies. Here, serum S100A9 also correlated with a worse response to WBRT in brain metastasis patients. Furthermore, we have validated the use of a blood-brain-barrier permeable RAGE inhibitor to restore radio-sensitivity in experimental brain metastasis models in vivo and in patient-derived organotypic cultures of radio-resistant brain metastasis ex vivo. In conclusion, we identified S100A9 as a major mediator of radio-resistance in brain metastasis and offer the molecular framework to personalize radiotherapy by exploiting it as a biomarker and as a therapeutic target, thus maximizing the benefits for the patient.

The diagnosis of brain metastasis involves high morbidity and mortality and remains an unmet clinical need in spite of being the most common tumor in the brain. Exclusion of these cancer patients from clinical trials is a major cause of their limited therapeutic options. We report a novel drug-screening platform (METPlatform) based on organotypic cultures which allows identifying effective anti-metastasis agents in the presence of the organ microenvironment. By applying this approach to brain metastasis, we identified heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) as a promising therapeutic target for CNS dissemination. DEBIO-0932, a blood-brain barrier permeable HSP90 inhibitor, shows high potency against mouse and human brain metastases from different primary origin and oncogenomic profile at clinically relevant stages of the disease, including a novel model of local relapse after neurosurgery. Furthermore, in situ proteomic analysis of brain metastases treated with the chaperone inhibitor revealed non-canonical clients of HSP90 as potential novel mediators of brain metastasis and actionable mechanisms of resistance driven by autophagy. Combined therapy using HSP90 and autophagy inhibitors showed synergistic effects compared to sublethal concentrations of each monotherapy, demonstrating the potential of METPlatform to design and test rationale combination therapies to target metastasis more effectively. Finally, we have exploited METPlatform as “avatars” to show that brain tumor PDOCs predict response of the corresponding patient to standard of care, thus proving the potential of METPlatform for improving personalized care in cancer. In conclusion, our work validates METPlatform as a potent resource for metastasis research integrating drug-screening and unbiased omic approaches that is fully compatible with human samples and questions the rationale of excluding patients with brain metastasis from clinical trials. We envision that METPlatform will be established as a clinically relevant strategy to personalize the management of metastatic disease in the brain and elsewhere.

Background High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been studied in several clinical scenarios in advanced germ cell cancer (GCC). Objective To establish a clinical practice guideline for HDCT use in the treatment of GCC patients. Design, setting, and participants An expert panel reviewed information available from the literature. The panel addressed relevant issues concerning and related to HDCT. The guideline was externally reviewed by two international experts. Results and limitations The efficacy of HDCT has been demonstrated in selected GCC patients. The most conclusive evidence comes from retrospective analyses that need to be interpreted with caution. HDCT can cure a significant proportion of heavily treated GCC patients. When indicated, sequential HDCT with regimens containing carboplatin and etoposide, as well as peripheral stem-cell support, is recommended. There is no conclusive evidence to recommend HDCT as first-line therapy. According to a multinational retrospective pooled analysis, HDCT might be superior to conventional CT as first salvage treatment in selected patients. There is an urgent need for prospective clinical trials addressing the value of HDCT in GCC patients who experience failure on first-line cisplatin-based CT. In patients who progress on conventional-dose salvage CT, HDCT should be considered. Treatment of these patients at experienced centers is strongly recommended. Conclusions It has been demonstrated that HDCT cures selected GCC patients who experience disease progression on conventional rescue regimens. The panel recommends the inclusion of GCC patients in randomized clinical trials including HDCT. Patient summary This consensus establishes clinical practice guidelines for the use and study of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell cancer.

Here we put forward a mathematical model describing the response of low-grade (WHO grade II) oligodendrogliomas (LGO) to temozolomide (TMZ). The model describes the longitudinal volumetric dynamics of tumor response to TMZ of a cohort of 11 LGO patients treated with TMZ. After finding patient-specific parameters, different therapeutic strategies were tried computationally on the ‘in-silico twins’ of those patients. Chemotherapy schedules with larger-than-standard rest periods between consecutive cycles had either the same or better long-term efficacy than the standard 28-day cycles. The results were confirmed in a large trial of 2000 virtual patients. These long-cycle schemes would also have reduced toxicity and defer the appearance of resistances. On the basis of those results, a combination scheme consisting of five induction TMZ cycles given monthly plus 12 maintenance cycles given every three months was found to provide substantial survival benefits for the in-silico twins of the 11 LGO patients (median 5.69 years, range: 0.67 to 68.45 years) and in a large virtual trial including 2000 patients. We used 220 sets of experiments in-silico to show that a clinical trial incorporating 100 patients per arm (standard intensive treatment versus 5 + 12 scheme) could demonstrate the superiority of the novel scheme after a follow-up period of 10 years. Thus, the proposed treatment plan could be the basis for a standardized TMZ treatment for LGO patients with survival benefits., Author summary We developed a mathematical model describing the longitudinal volumetric growth data of grade II oligodendroglioma patients and their response to temozolomide. The model was used to explore alternative therapeutic protocols for the in-silico twins of the patients and in virtual clinical trials. The simulations show that enlarging the time interval between chemotherapy cycles would maintain the therapeutic efficacy, while limiting toxicity and deferring the development of resistance. This may allow for improved drug-exposure by administering a larger number of cycles for longer treatment periods. A scheme based on this idea consisting of an induction phase (5 consecutive cycles, 1 per month) and a maintenance phase (12 cycles given in three-months intervals) led to substantial survival benefits in-silico. The computational results suggest that a clinical trial enrolling 100 patients per arm (standard intensive therapy versus 5+12 novel scheme) could prove the effectiveness of the proposed approach after a follow-up period of 10 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multifocal glioblastomas (ie, glioblastomas with multiple foci, unconnected in postcontrast pretreatment T1-weighted images) represent a challenge in clinical practice due to their poor prognosis. We wished to obtain imaging biomarkers with prognostic value that have not been found previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1155 patients with glioblastomas from 10 local institutions during 2006–2017 provided 97 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria of the study and classified as having multifocal glioblastomas. Tumors were segmented and morphologic features were computed using different methodologies: 1) measured on the largest focus, 2) aggregating the different foci as a whole, and 3) recording the extreme value obtained for each focus. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards, correlations, and Harrell concordance indices (c-indices) were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Age (P < .001, hazard ratio = 2.11, c-index = 0.705), surgery (P < .001, hazard ratio = 2.04, c-index = 0.712), contrast-enhancing rim width (P < .001, hazard ratio = 2.15, c-index = 0.704), and surface regularity (P = .021, hazard ratio = 1.66, c-index = 0.639) measured on the largest focus were significant independent predictors of survival. Maximum contrast-enhancing rim width (P = .002, hazard ratio = 2.05, c-index = 0.668) and minimal surface regularity (P = .036, hazard ratio = 1.64, c-index = 0.600) were also significant. A multivariate model using age, surgery, and contrast-enhancing rim width measured on the largest foci classified multifocal glioblastomas into groups with different outcomes (P < .001, hazard ratio = 3.00, c-index = 0.853, median survival difference = 10.55 months). Moreover, quartiles with the highest and lowest individual prognostic scores based on the focus with the largest volume and surgery were identified as extreme groups in terms of survival (P < .001, hazard ratio = 18.67, c-index = 0.967). CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model incorporating imaging findings on pretreatment postcontrast T1-weighted MRI classified patients with glioblastoma into different prognostic groups.

Finding effective treatment options for patients with brain metastasis remains an unmet need. Given the limitations imposed by the blood-brain-barrier for systemic approaches, radiotherapy offers a superior ability to access the brain. While whole-brain-radiation-therapy (WBRT) historically has been the gold standard in the management of brain metastasis patients, clinical practice rapidly adapted the frequent use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), given the high incidence of neurotoxicity when giving WBRT. However, WBRT continuous to be an important treatment option, since many patients present with numerous multifocal lesions, high risk of SRS-associated radionecrosis, bad performance scores or probable distant intracranial recurrence, rendering them ineligible for SRS. Unfortunately, overall survival of patients remains unaffected by radiotherapy. In spite of this clinical data, the underlying molecular mechanisms that allow metastatic cells to resist radiotherapy in the brain is unknown. We have applied WBRT to experimental brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma and validated their resistance in vivo. An unbiased search to identify potential mediators of resistance identified the S100A9-RAGE-NFkB-JunB pathway. Targeting this pathway genetically reverts the resistance to radiotherapy and increases therapeutic benefits in vivo. In two independent cohorts of brain metastasis from lung and breast adenocarcinoma patients, levels of S100A9 correlate with the response to radiotherapy, offering a novel approach to stratify patients according to their expected benefit. As a proof of concept, we also detected S100A9 in serum and CSF samples from brain metastasis patients, complementing our biomarker strategy with a less invasive approach. Furthermore, we have validated the use of a blood-brain-barrier permeable RAGE inhibitor to restore radio-sensitivity in experimental brain metastasis models in vivo and in patient-derived organotypic cultures of radio-resistant brain metastasis ex vivo. In conclusion, we identified S100A9 as a major mediator of radio-resistance in brain metastasis and offer the molecular framework to personalize radiotherapy by exploiting it as a biomarker and as a therapeutic target, thus maximizing the benefits for the patient. Citation Format: Lauritz Miarka, Catia Monteiro, Celine Dalmasso, Natalia Yebra, Coral Fustero-Torre, Aisling Hegarty, Stephen Keelan, Eduardo Caleiras, Vareslija Damir, Leonie Young, Riccardo Soffietti, Juan M. Sepúlveda, Angel Pérez, Aurelio Lain, Aurore Siegfied, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal, Manuel Valiente. S100A9 mediates radiation resistance of brain metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-068.

Urothelial bladder cancer (UC) is the most common malignancy involving the urinary system and represents a significant health problem. Immunotherapy has been used for decades for UC with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) set as the standard of care for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has completely transformed the treatment landscape of bladder cancer enabling to expand the treatment strategies. Novel ICIs have successfully shown improved outcomes on metastatic disease to such an extent that the standard of care paradigm has changed leading to the development of different trials with the aim of determining whether ICIs may have a role in early disease. The localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) scenario remains challenging since the recurrence rate continues to be high despite all therapeutic efforts. This article will review the current experience of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting of UC, the clinical trials landscape and finally, an insight of what to expect in the immediate and mid-term future.

Background. The use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here we show data on patients who responded to bevacizumab, then stopped bevacizumab for any reason other than progression and were rechallenged with bevacizumab at the time of subsequent progression. Methods. This retrospective study included 28 patients, classified in 2 cohorts: those for whom the first exposure to bevacizumab (BEV-1) was first-line treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (Bev-F; N = 12) and those for whom BEV-1 was second- or third-line treatment for recurrent disease after standard treatment (Bev-S; N = 16). Results. All patients received standard radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Bev-F patients also received concomitant bevacizumab. All 28 patients received a total of 57 treatment lines with bevacizumab (12 first-line and 45 second- or further-line). Twenty-nine lines were rechallenges (BEV-2 [N = 26] or BEV-3 [N = 3]). Objective response to rechallenge was 58.6% and clinical benefit was 89.6%. Overall survival (OS) was 55 months for RPA class IV and 26.7 months for RPA class V patients (P = .01). OS was 26.7 months for Bev-F patients and 52.1 months for Bev-S patients (P = .004). Post-progression survival was 20 months for Bev-F patients and 39.6 months for Bev-S patients (HR = 0.26; P = .007). Conclusion. This is the largest study to examine the impact of a bevacizumab rechallenge in glioblastoma patients who had responded to previous bevacizumab treatment but who stopped before progression. Our findings indicate that these patients can attain a second response or clinical benefit from re-introduction of bevacizumab. The potential benefit from intermittent versus continuous treatment warrants comparison in clinical trials.