Search

Understanding occurrence and timing of second events (recurrence and second primary cancer) is essential for cancer specific survival analysis. However, this information is not readily available in administrative data.Alberta Cancer Registry, physician claims, and other administrative data were used. Timing of second event was estimated based on our developed algorithm. For validation, the difference, in days between the algorithm estimated and the chart-reviewed timing of second event. Further, the result of Cox-regression modeling cancer-free survival was compared to chart review data.Majority (74.3%) of the patients had a difference between the chart-reviewed and algorithm-estimated timing of second event falling within the 0-60 days window. Kaplan-Meier curves generated from the estimated data and chart review data were comparable with a 5-year second-event-free survival rate of 75.4% versus 72.5%.The algorithm provided an estimated timing of second event similar to that of the chart review.

Background Close margins influence treatment and outcome in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study evaluates 187 cases of surgically treated OSCC regarding the impact of close margins on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Methods Predictors of worsened outcome were identified using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results Tumour size [HR:1.70(0.95–3.08)], nodal status [HR:2.15(1.00–4.64)], presence of extracapsular spread (ECS) [HR:6.36(2.41–16.74)] and smoking history [HR:2.87(1.19–6.86)] were associated with worsened RFS. Similar factors were associated with worsened DSS. Close margins did not influence RFS or DSS. Conclusions While most conventional risk factors for OSCC conferred a worsened outcome, close margins did not. One explanation for this would be that close margins ( Graphical abstract

Major surgery involving resection and free flap reconstruction is a mainstay of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, but postoperative morbidity and complications are common. One of the foundations for better surgical outcomes is early mobilization, which is included in enhanced recovery guidelines for all surgical specialties. However, a major unsolved challenge with early mobilization after surgery is quantifying how much a patient moves. To date, mobilization after major HNC surgery has been reported as the time to mobilization, i.e. the interval between the date of surgery and the date of the initial meaningful mobilization. Other data on postoperative mobilization in these patients are limited. Although clinicians can document mobilization via multidisciplinary progress notes, an estimate of mobilization for each postoperative day would be subjective and based on observations from several clinicians and/or the recall of the patient. Advancing research on postoperative mobilization requires the ability to objectively measure patient activity, particularly ambulatory activity, without placing a further burden on the inpatient team. Wearable activity trackers may provide a solution. Data from other surgical specialties indicate that such objective monitoring of patient ambulation in real-time to support interventions to increase mobilization may provide opportunities to improve clinical care. Objective measurement of step counts after HNC surgery would lead to an understanding of the dose-response relationship (the required quantity and frequency of mobilization that is safe and beneficial). In conclusion, the integration of wearable activity trackers in the care plan for patients undergoing HNC surgery will facilitate the measurement and improvement of postoperative mobilization to reduce complications, improve surgical outcomes and enhance patient recovery.

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the association between prescribers' opioid prescribing history and persistent postoperative opioid use in cancer patients undergoing curative-intent surgery. BACKGROUND Study has shown that patients may be over-prescribed analgesics after surgery. However, whether and how the prescriber's opioid prescribing behavior impacts persistent opioid use is unclear. METHODS All adults with a diagnosis of solid cancers who underwent surgery during the study period (2009-2015) in Alberta, Canada and were opioid-naive were included. The key exposure was the historical opioid-prescribing pattern of a patient's most responsible prescriber. The primary outcome was "new persistent postoperative opioid user," was defined as a patient who was opioid-naive before surgery and subsequently filled at least 1 opioid prescription between 60 and 180 days after surgery. RESULTS We identified 24,500 patients. Of these, 2106 (8.6%) patients became a new persistent opioid user after surgery. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with most responsible prescribers that historically prescribed higher daily doses of opioids (≥50 vs

PurposeHuman papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the fastest rising cancer in North America. There is significant interest in treatment de-escalation for these patients given the generally favourable prognosis. However, 15-30% of patients recur after primary treatment, reflecting a need for improved risk-stratification tools. We sought to develop a molecular test to predict the survival of patients with newly diagnosed HPV+ HNSCC.MethodsWe created a prognostic score (UWO3) that was successfully validated in six independent cohorts comprising 906 patients, including blinded retrospective and prospective external validations. Transcriptomic data from two aggressive radiation de-escalation cohorts were used to assess the ability of UWO3 to identify patients who recur. Multivariate Cox models were used to assess the associations between the UWO3 immune class and outcomes.ResultsA three-gene immune score classified patients into three immune classes (immune rich, mixed, or immune desert) and was strongly associated with disease-free survival in six datasets, including large retrospective and prospective datasets. Pooled analysis demonstrated that the immune rich group had superior disease-free survival at 5 years to the immune desert (HR= 9.0, 95% CI 3.2–25.5, P=3.6×10−5) and mixed (HR=6.4, 95%CI 2.2–18.7, P=0.006) groups after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, and AJCC8 clinical stage. Finally, UWO3 was able to identify patients from two treatment de-escalation cohorts who remain disease-free after aggressive de-escalation to 30 Gy radiation.ConclusionsThe UWO3 immune score could enable biomarker-driven clinical decision-making for patients with HPV+ HNSCC based on robust outcome prediction across six independent cohorts. The superior survival of immune rich patients supports de-intensification strategies, while the inferior outcomes of the immune desert patients suggest the potential for intensification and/or immunotherapy. Prospective de-escalation and intensification clinical trials are currently being planned.

SUMMARY Patient-reported outcomes regarding donor-site morbidity and quality of life for the fibula free flap in head and neck reconstruction patients have not been studied. The authors reviewed and identified patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction using a fibula free flap (2011 to 2016). Patients were assessed via physical examination and two patient-reported outcomes questionnaires: the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (score range, 0 to 100) and the Pain Disability Questionnaire (score range, 0 to 100). Quantitative data were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests. Semistructured interviews exploring donor-site challenges were performed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Seventeen patients agreed to participate. Their mean age was 62 years (range, 41 to 81 years). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range, 12 to 65 years). Mean perceived level of function compared to baseline was 67 percent. Mean scores for the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score subscales were 84.6 (pain), 80.5 (symptoms), 86.7 (activities of daily living), 67.7 (sport), and 65.6 (quality of life). The mean Pain Disability Questionnaire score was 26.3 (mild/moderate perceived disability). Higher perceived level of function was associated with higher Foot and Ankle Outcome Score values (pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living, p < 0.05). Donor limbs had decreased range of motion and manual muscle testing scores compared with their contralateral limbs (p < 0.05). Lack of ankle support and balance, resulting in limitations and aversions to daily and sporting activities, were the most common themes regarding donor-site challenges. In conclusion, patients who have undergone fibula free flap harvest struggle with ankle support and balance and face functional difficulties that have an impact on their quality of life. Multidisciplinary approaches for targeted rehabilitation after fibula free flap harvest should be explored to determine the impact on patients' quality of life.

Same-day surgery (SDS) following mastectomy is safe and well accepted. Overnight admission in patients fit for discharge is an inefficient use of health resources. In response to a national review highlighting SDS following mastectomy at 1.4% in Alberta, a perioperative pathway was conceived. The pathway was implemented across Alberta at 13 hospitals beginning in 2016. A steering committee was assembled, and clinical and administrative leads at each site were identified. Opportunities along the patient care experience whereby action could be taken to promote uptake of SDS were identified. Provincially branded support materials including presentations, order sets, and standard operating procedures were developed. Nurse educators provided in-service teaching such as standardized drain care and discharge teaching. Educational booklets, group classes, and online resources were developed for patients and families. An audit of SDS rates, unscheduled return to the emergency department (ED), and readmission rates was reported to teams quarterly, allowing for iterative modifications. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) were collected. SDS following mastectomy increased from 1.7 to 47.8%, releasing an estimated 831 bed days per year. No differences in unexpected return to the ED or readmission to hospital existed between SDS patients and those admitted overnight. A total of 102 patients completed the PREM survey, of whom 90% felt “excellent or good” with the plan to go home, how to care for themselves once home, and who to contact should issues arise. Implementation of a provincial perioperative pathway improved uptake of SDS following mastectomy and demonstrated favorable PREMs.

There are a number of studies in the literature that describe the prevalence, causes, and factors associated with chronic postoperative opioid use, but there is a lack of synthesis of the literature to guide clinicians in optimally managing postoperative pain while avoiding opioid dependence. Thus, the goal of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to investigate the prevalence of chronic postoperative opioid use and the associated risk factors. A systematic search was performed using Ovid Medline and Embase according to PRISMA guidelines. Data were collected on the following outcomes of interest: prevalence of opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and risk factors associated with chronic postoperative opioid use. Forty-three articles were included in the final analysis. The mean prevalence of chronic postoperative opioid use in all populations at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was 30.5%, 25.6%, and 25.2%, respectively. The prevalence of patients who developed chronic opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was 10.4%, 8.5%, and 9.8%, respectively. Forty of the articles analyzed risk factors associated with chronic postoperative opioid use. The most common associated risk factor identified was preoperative opioid use with 27 articles demonstrating a significant association with chronic postoperative opioid use. The current opioid crisis is in part secondary to the prevalence of chronic opioid use following surgery. This study identified associated risk factors with chronic postoperative opioid use, which may help identify patients at risk for developing chronic postoperative opioid use.

Surgery with free flap reconstruction is a standard treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Because of the complexity of HNC surgery, recovery can be challenging, and complications are common. One of the foundations of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is early postoperative mobilization. The ERAS guidelines for HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction recommend mobilization within 24 h. This is based mainly on evidence from other surgical disciplines, and the extent to which mobilization within 24 h improves recovery after HNC surgery has not been explored. This retrospective analysis included 445 patients from the Calgary Head and Neck Enhanced Recovery Program. Mobilization after 24 h was associated with more complications of any type (OR = 1.73, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 1.16–2.57) and more major complications (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.00–3.16). When accounting for patient and clinical factors, mobilization after 48 h was a significant predictor of major complications (OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.10–6.21) and prolonged length of stay (&gt, 10 days, OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.41–5.76). This comprehensive analysis of the impact of early mobilization on postoperative complications and length of stay in a large HNC cohort provides novel evidence supporting adherence to the ERAS early mobilization recommendations. Early mobilization should be a priority for patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction.

One of the foundational elements of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines is early postoperative mobilization. For patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction, the ERAS guideline recommends patients be mobilized within 24 h postoperatively. The objective of this study was to evaluate compliance with the ERAS recommendation for early postoperative mobilization in 445 consecutive patients who underwent HNC surgery in the Calgary Head and Neck Enhanced Recovery Program. This retrospective analysis found that recommendation compliance increased by 10% despite a more aggressive target for mobilization (from 48 to 24 h). This resulted in a decrease in postoperative mobilization time and a stark increase in the proportion of patients mobilized within 24 h (from 10% to 64%). There was a significant relationship between compliance with recommended care and time to postoperative mobilization (Spearman’s rho = −0.80, p &lt, 0.001). Hospital length of stay was reduced by a median of 2 days, from 12 (1QR = 9–16) to 10 (1QR = 8–14) days (z = 3.82, 0.001) in patients who received guideline-concordant care. Engaging the clinical team and changing the order set to support clinical decision-making resulted in increased adherence to guideline-recommended care for patients undergoing major HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction.

Background Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are an understudied population whose treatment often includes surgery, causing a wide range of side effects. Exercise prehabilitation is a promising tool to optimize patient outcomes and may confer additional benefits as a prehabilitation tool. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs), physical function, and in-hospital mobilization across the HNC surgical timeline in advance of a future prehabilitation trial. The secondary objective was to examine potential changes in these outcomes across the surgical timeline. Methods HNC patients scheduled to undergo oncologic resection with free-flap reconstruction completed assessments of PROs and physical function at three timepoints across the surgical timeline (baseline, in-hospital, and postsurgical/outpatient). Mobilization was measured during the in-hospital period. The feasibility of recruitment and measurement completion was tracked, as were changes in both PROs and physical function. Results Of 48 eligible patients, 16 enrolled (recruitment rate of 33%). The baseline and in-hospital PROs were completed by 88% of participants, while the outpatient assessments were completed by 81% of participants. The baseline and in-hospital assessment of physical function were completed by 56% of participants, and 38% completed the outpatient assessment. Measuring in-hospital mobilization was completed for 63% of participants. Conclusion Measuring PROs and in-hospital mobilization is feasible across the surgical timeline in HNC; however, the in-person assessment of physical function prior to surgery was not feasible. A multidisciplinary collaboration between exercise specialists and clinicians supported the development of new clinical workflows in HNC surgical care that will aid in the implementation of a future prehabilitation trial for this patient population.

e18043 Background: Head and neck cancer is the 6th most common cancer worldwide. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent head and neck cancer that is characterized by aggressive local invasion and metastasis. Despite the leading edge (invasive front) of the tumor being a driver of OSCC pathophysiology, its biology and clinical relevance have not been fully characterized. We used spatial transcriptomics to explore signaling patterns within the leading edge and tumor core. Methods: Fresh-frozen, surgically resected OSCC samples from three HPV-negative OSCC patients were profiled using the 10x Genomics Visium Spatial Gene Expression platform. Leading edge and tumor core regions were defined by pathologist annotations and expression of previously identified edge and core gene signatures from the literature. Spatial differential gene expression (DGE) analysis and pathway analysis was performed using the Seurat package and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), respectively. Cell-cell interaction networks were reconstructed using the CellChat package. Results: The leading edge and tumor core displayed unique transcriptional and signaling profiles that were conserved across all three OSCC patient samples. DEG analysis revealed 31 genes enriched in the leading edge and 62 genes enriched in the tumor core with a log2FC > 0.58 and adjusted p-value < 0.01. The top genes upregulated in the leading edge were FN1, COL1A1, COL1A2, IFITM3, and SPARC. Top tumor-core genes included CRCT1, LCE3D, DEFB4A, SPRR2A, and CNFN. IPA analysis of upregulated DEGs in the leading edge and tumor core predicted the activation of wound healing and GP6 signaling pathways, and activation of intrinsic prothrombin activation and MSP-RON signaling pathways, respectively. Cell communication analysis revealed that the leading edge had higher intercellular signaling than the tumor core. Upregulated leading edge cell signaling modules included collagen, CD99, CSPG4, and non-canonical WNT pathways, which have been linked to tumor invasion, metastasis, and adhesion. COL1A1 and COL1A2 ligands and CD44 and SDC1 receptors were upregulated in leading edge signaling. The tumor core was enriched for ANGPTL and PERIOSTIN cell signaling modules. Conclusions: This is the first study to characterize the tumor core and leading edge of OSCC tumors using spatial transcriptomics. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of identified signaling pathways may improve OSCC outcomes.

ObjectivesTo understand how surgical services have been reorganised during and following public health emergencies, particularly the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the consequences for patients, healthcare providers and healthcare systems.DesignA rapid scoping review.SettingWe searched the MEDLINE, Embase and grey literature sources for documents and press releases from governments and surgical organisations or associations.ParticipantsStudies examining surgical service delivery during public health emergencies including COVID-19, and the impact on patients, providers and healthcare systems were included.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were strategies implemented for the reorganisation of surgical services. Secondary were the impacts of reorganisation and resuming surgical services, such as: adverse events (including morbidity and mortality), primary care and emergency department visits, length of hospital and ICU stay, and changes to surgical waitlists.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-two studies were included in this review; 111 described reorganisation of surgical services, 55 described the consequences of reorganising surgical services; and 6 reported actions taken to rebuild surgical capacity in public health emergencies. Reorganisations of surgical services were grouped under six domains: case selection/triage, personal protective equipment (PPE) regulations and practice, workforce composition and deployment, outpatient and inpatient patient care, resident and fellow education, and the hospital or clinical environment. Service reorganisations led to large reductions in non-urgent surgical volumes, increases in surgical wait times and impacted medical training (ie, reduced case involvement) and patient outcomes (eg, increases in pain). Strategies for rebuilding surgical capacity were scarce but focused on the availability of staff, PPE and patient readiness for surgery as key factors to consider before resuming services.ConclusionsReorganisation of surgical services in response to public health emergencies appears to be context dependent and has far-reaching consequences that must be better understood in order to optimise future health system responses to public health emergencies.

BackgroundHealthcare systems globally have been challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating the reorganization of surgical services to free capacity within healthcare systems.ObjectivesTo understand how surgical services have been reorganized during and following public health emergencies, and the consequences of these changes for patients, healthcare providers and healthcare systems.MethodsThis rapid scoping review searched academic databases and grey literature sources to identify studies examining surgical service delivery during public health emergencies including COVID-19, and the impact on patients, providers and healthcare systems. Recommendations and guidelines were excluded. Screening was completed in partial (title, abstract) or complete (full text) duplicate following pilot reviews of 50 articles to ensure reliable application of eligibility criteria.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-two studies were included in this review; 111 described reorganization of surgical services, 55 described the consequences of reorganizing surgical services and six reported actions taken to rebuild surgical capacity in public health emergencies. Reorganizations of surgical services were grouped under six domains: case selection/triage, PPE regulations and practice, workforce composition and deployment, outpatient and inpatient patient care, resident and fellow education, and the hospital or clinical environment. Service reorganizations led to large reductions in non-urgent surgical volumes, increases in surgical wait times, and impacted medical training (i.e., reduced case involvement) and patient outcomes (e.g., increases in pain). Strategies for rebuilding surgical capacity were scarce, but focused on the availability of staff, PPE, and patient readiness for surgery as key factors to consider before resuming services.ConclusionsReorganization of surgical services in response to public health emergencies appears to be context-dependent and has far-reaching consequences that must be better understood in order to optimize future health system responses to public health emergencies.ARTICLE SUMMARYStrengths and limitations of the studyThis rapid scoping review provides an exhaustive and rigorous summary of the academic and grey literature regarding modifications to surgical services in response to public health emergencies, especially COVID-19.This study did not limit studies based on location or language of publication to ensure a worldwide pandemic had contributions from worldwide voices.Both quantitative and qualitative outcomes were included, with a mix of inductive and deductive data abstraction approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of surgical services during public health emergencies.Studies with potential relevance to this question are emerging at an unprecedented rate in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and as such, some may not be included in the current review.Original protocol for the studyAs requested, the original unpublished protocol for this study is included as a supplementary file.Funding statementThis study did not receive grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Competing interest statementAll authors declare that they have no competing interests in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors uniform declaration of competing interests.

Background Physician opioid-prescribing patterns have significant impacts on the current opioid crisis. Patients who use opioids in the postoperative period are at risk of developing chronic postoperative opioid use. This study determined the rate of chronic postoperative opioid use among head and neck cancer patients undergoing primary surgery with free-flap reconstruction. Additionally, this study identified major risk factors associated with the development of chronic postoperative opioid use. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for all adults (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing primary head and neck surgical resection with free-flap reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2015. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database, Otobase™. Data from the provincial drug insurance program were used to capture drug dispensing information to determine chronic opioid use at 3- and 12-months postoperatively. Data extracted from Otobase™ included patient demographics, social habits, clinical stage, pathological stage, type of surgery, and adjuvant treatment. Results The total cohort was comprised of 212 patients. Chronic opioid use at 3- and 12- months postoperatively was observed in 136 (64%) and 116 (55%) patients, respectively. Of the 212 patients, 85 patients (40%) were identified as preoperative opioid users and 127 were opioid naïve (60%). Of the 85 patients who were preoperative opioid users, 70 (82%) and 63 (77%) patients continued to use opioids 3- and 12-months postoperatively, respectively. The proportion of opioid-naïve patients who were using opioids at 3- and 12-months postoperatively was 52% (66 patients) and 42% (53 patients), respectively. Identified risk factors included preoperative opioid use, prior tobacco use, advanced pathologic T-stage, and adjuvant treatment. Conclusions Among head and neck cancer patients that have undergone major resection with free-flap reconstruction, the prevalence of chronic postoperative opioid users was considerable. Identified risk factors included preoperative opioid use, prior tobacco use, tumor stage, and adjuvant treatment. Graphical abstract

Two new cancer centers providing radiation therapy opened in Alberta, Canada, in 2010 and 2013, respectively. We aimed to assess whether opening the new RT centers influenced mastectomy rates for breast cancer. Breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2004 through 2015 were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Mastectomy rates for 64 predefined health status areas (HSAs) were calculated after adjusting for patient and system factors. Variations in mastectomy rates among the HSAs were quantified using weighted coefficient of variation (CV). Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine associations between driving time and mastectomy use in the entire cohort and in subgroups. Of the 21,872 patients, the proportion of patients who lived a ≤ 60 min drive from the nearest RT center significantly increased from 68.8% (95% CI 67.7–69.9%) to 80.7% (95% CI 79.5–81.9%) during the study period. Concurrently, the crude provincial mastectomy rate decreased from 56.2% (95% CI 55.3–57.1%) to 45.3% (95% CI 44.1–46.5%). However, variation in adjusted mastectomy rates (weighted CV) across the 64 HSAs increased from 9.5 to 14.6. Factors associated with mastectomy included age, larger tumor size, lymph node involvement, higher tumor grade, molecular subtype, lobular histology type, more comorbidities, academic institution, region, earlier period of diagnosis, and longer driving time to the nearest RT center. Opening new RT centers in previously underserved regions reduced driving times to the nearest center, and was associated with a reduction in mastectomy rates; however, these reductions among regions across the province were not uniform.

To review the development and the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in non-head and neck disciplines and to describe early implementation efforts in major head and neck surgeries.Several groups have adopted ERAS protocols for major head and neck surgery and demonstrated its feasibility and effectiveness.There is growing evidence that clinical and financial outcomes for patients undergoing major head and neck surgery rehabilitation can be significantly improved by standardizing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment protocols. Current experience is limited to single centers. A future goal is to broaden the adoption of ERAS in head and neck surgical oncology to include national and international collaboration, data sharing, and learning.

Background The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is increasing and has better survival than non-HPV related oropharyngeal SCC. This study compared surgical to nonsurgical treatments and demographic, clinical, and survival differences in patients with oropharyngeal SCC, stratified by p16 status. Methods We assembled a cohort of adult patients with oropharyngeal SCC diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 in Alberta. The tumor p16 biomarker was measured using fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Results In this cohort, p16 data were available for 115 of 357 patients; and 66% (n = 76) were p16-positive. Patients with p16 data had comparable outcomes to those without. Surgically treated p16-negative patients had improved 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with nonsurgical patients. There were no differences in survival outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical treatment for patients with p16-positive disease. Conclusion Patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal SCC had similar outcomes regardless of treatment. Patients with p16-negative tumors may benefit from primary surgery with postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Background The purpose of this study was to optimize an existing clinical care pathway (CCP) for head and neck cancer with a high-observation protocol (HOP) and to determine the effect on length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay in hospital (LOS). Methods The HOP mandated initiation of spontaneous breathing trials before the conclusion of the surgery, weaning of sedation, and limiting mechanical ventilation. All patients with head and neck cancer undergoing primary surgery on the HOP were compared to a historical cohort regarding length of ICU admission, ICU readmissions, and LOS. Results Ninety-six and 52 patients were observed in “historical” and “HOP” cohorts. The length of ICU admission (1.9 vs 1.2 days; p = .021), LOS (20.3 vs 14.1 days; p = .020), and ICU readmissions (10.4% vs 1.9%; p = .013) were significantly decreased in the “HOP” cohort. Conclusion Rapid weaning of sedation and limiting mechanical ventilation may contribute to a shorter length of ICU admission and LOS, as well as decreased ICU readmissions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2017

Objectives This article presents a quantitative technique to assess motion quality and smoothness during the performance of micromanipulation tasks common to surgical maneuvers. The objective is to investigate the effectiveness of the jerk index, a derivative of acceleration with respect to time, as a kinetostatic measure for assessment of surgical performance. Design A surgical forceps was instrumented with a position tracker and accelerometer that allowed measurement of position and acceleration relative to tool motion. Participants were asked to perform peg-in-hole tasks on a modified O'Connor Dexterity board and a Tweezer Dexterity pegboard (placed inside a skull). Normalized jerk index was calculated for each individual task to compare smoothness of each group. Setting This study was conducted at Project neuroArm, Cumming School of Medicine, the University of Calgary. Participants Four groups of participants (surgeons, surgery residents, engineers, and gamers) participated in the tests. Results Results showed that the surgeons exhibited better jerk index performance in all tasks. Moreover, the residents experienced motions closer to the surgeons compared to the engineers and gamers. One-way analysis of variance test indicated a significant difference between the mean values of normalized jerk indices among 4 groups during the performance of all tasks. Moreover, the mean value of the normalized jerk index significantly varied for each group from one task to another. Conclusions Normalized jerk index as an independent parameter with respect to time and amplitude is an indicator of motion smoothness and can be used to assess hand motion dexterity of surgeons. Furthermore, the method provides a quantifiable metrics for trainee assessment and proficiency, particularly relevant as surgical training shifts toward a competency-based paradigm.

Background Patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have substantially better treatment response and overall survival (OS) than patients with HPV-negative disease. Treatment options for HPV+ OPC can involve either a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach (± concomitant chemotherapy) or a primary surgical approach (± adjuvant radiation) with transoral surgery (TOS). These two treatment paradigms have different spectrums of toxicity. The goals of this study are to assess the OS of two de-escalation approaches (primary radiotherapy and primary TOS) compared to historical control, and to compare survival, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) profiles between the two approaches. Methods This is a multicenter phase II study randomizing one hundred and forty patients with T1–2 N0–2 HPV+ OPC in a 1:1 ratio between de-escalated primary radiotherapy (60 Gy) ± concomitant chemotherapy and TOS ± de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy (50–60 Gy based on risk factors). Patients will be stratified based on smoking status ( Discussion This study will provide an assessment of two de-escalation approaches to the treatment of HPV+ OPC on oncologic outcomes, QOL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03210103. Date of registration: July 6, 2017, Current version: 1.3 on March 15, 2019.

Objectives:\ud \ud To test the performance of an oral cancer prognostic 13-gene signature for the prediction of survival of patients diagnosed with HPV-negative and p16-negative oral cavity cancer.\ud Materials and Methods:\ud \ud Diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded oral cavity cancer tumor samples were obtained from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington, University of Calgary, University of Michigan, University of Utah, and seven ARCAGE study centers coordinated by the International Agency of Research on Cancer. RNA from 638 Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and p16-negative samples was analyzed for the 13 genes using a NanoString assay. Ridge-penalized Cox regressions were applied to samples randomly split into discovery and validation sets to build models and evaluate the performance of the 13-gene signature in predicting 2-year oral cavity cancer-specific survival overall and separately for patients with early and late stage disease.\ud Results:\ud \ud Among AJCC stage I/II patients, including the 13-gene signature in the model resulted in substantial improvement in the prediction of 2-year oral cavity cancer-specific survival. For models containing age and sex with and without the 13-gene signature score, the areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and partial AUC were 0.700 vs. 0.537 (p < 0.001), and 0.046 vs. 0.018 (p < 0.001), respectively. Improvement in predicting prognosis for AJCC stage III/IV disease also was observed, but to a lesser extent.\ud Conclusions:\ud \ud If confirmed using tumor samples from a larger number of early stage oral cavity cancer patients, the 13-gene signature may inform personalized treatment of early stage HPV-negative and p16-negative oral cavity cancer patients.

Otorhinolaryngology (ORL)/otolaryngology-head and neck surgery encompasses a broad range of diseases and procedures. Many ORL procedures are performed on a day surgery basis and are therefore not usually the focus of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. This chapter will primarily consider management of patients undergoing major head and neck resection with free flap reconstruction while recognizing that ERAS principles can easily be applied to other surgical treatments within ORL. Current evidence reveals that care pathways, fast-track protocols, and ERAS all show meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes while reducing length of stay (LOS) and costs of care. We conclude that ERAS approaches should be more broadly applied within ORL.

Background Care pathways (CPs) offer a proven method of systematically improving patient care. CPs are particularly helpful in complex clinical conditions where variation in care is a problem such as patients undergoing major head and neck resection with free flap reconstruction. Although CPs have been used to manage this patient group, most CPs are implemented as part of relatively short-term quality improvement projects. This paper outlines a detailed methodology for designing and delivering a quality management program sustained for 9 years. Methods We describe a change management approach informed by Kotter’s “8 Step Process” that provided a useful framework to guide program development and implementation. We then provide a detailed, step by step description of how such a program can be implemented as well as a detailed summary of time and costs for design, implementation and sustainability phases. An approach to design and delivery of a measurement, audit and feedback system is also provided. Results We present a summary of resources needed to design and implement a head and neck surgery quality management program. The primary result of this study is a design for a sustainable quality management program that can be used to guide and improve care for patients undergoing major head and neck resection with free flap reconstruction. Conclusions A change management approach to design and delivery of a head and neck quality management program is practical and feasible.

Background Care pathways (CPs) are helpful in reducing unwanted variation in clinical care. Most studies of CPs show they improve clinical outcomes but there is little known about the long-term impact of CPs as part of a sustained quality management program. Head and neck (HN) surgery with free flap reconstruction is complex, time-consuming and expensive. Complications are common and therefore CPs applied to this patient population are the focus of this paper. In this paper we report outcomes from a 9 year experience designing and using CPs in the management of patients undergoing major head and neck resection with free flap reconstruction. Methods The Calgary quality management program and CP design is described the accompanying article. Data from CP managed patients undergoing major HN surgery were prospectively collected and compared to a baseline cohort of patients managed with standard care. Data were retrospectively analyzed and intergroup comparisons were made. Results Mobilization, decannulation time and hospital length of stay were significantly improved in pathway-managed patients (p = 0.001). Trend analysis showed sustained improvement in key performance indicators including complications. Return to the OR, primarily to assess a compromised flap, is increasing. Conclusions Care pathways when deployed as part of an ongoing quality management program are associated with improved clinical outcomes in this complex group of patients.