Search

Background: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) may progress through cardiac remodeling to persistent atrial fibrillation (psAF). However, some may present in psAF without a preceding history of pAF. A preceding history of pAF may affect recurrence after direct current cardioversion (DCCV)., Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether a preceding history of pAF is associated with a difference in recurrence rates after DCCV compared with patients without a preceding history of pAF., Methods: A prospective procedural database at a Veterans Affairs center identified 565 patients who underwent their first DCCV for psAF. Initial rhythm history was separated by prior pAF, and those with none were considered primary psAF. Electrocardiography follow-up was standardized at 1 month and 3 months after cardioversion., Results: Patients who underwent their first DCCV for psAF were more likely to have presented with primary psAF (81.6%). Those with pAF had a similar left atrial size but were more likely to have chronic kidney disease, sleep apnea, previous stroke, and use of antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of cardioversion. Patients with pAF had earlier recurrence and shorter median AF survival time, 1.6 months compared with 5 months (Kaplan-Meier plot, P = .0101). This difference persisted in controlling for antiarrhythmic drug use. Recurrence type was mostly persistent AF, similar in both groups., Conclusion: Patients with primary psAF may have a more sustained response to DCCV compared with those with a preceding history of pAF. Thus, those patients with pAF may benefit from a more aggressive, early rhythm control strategy because of higher likelihood of recurrence with DCCV., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Safe and effective management of venous vascular access is a key component of electrophysiology (EP) procedures. Recently, the Z-stitch method has been developed for effective venous hemostasis. However, the standard postprocedure protocol often includes prolonged bed rest, which may affect patient satisfaction. The ZEBRA (Z stitch Early Bed Rest Assessment) study aims to systematically investigate and quantify patient satisfaction metrics and safety parameters associated with the early mobilization after Z-stitch placement., Objective: This study primarily investigates whether early mobilization following Z-stitch placement in venous vascular access management during EP procedures enhances patient satisfaction without compromising safety., Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, approximately 200 patients undergoing various EP procedures at Oregon Health and Science University and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System will be randomly assigned to either a 1- or 4-hour bed rest regimen post-Z stitch. Patient satisfaction will be assessed through survey, alongside monitoring for hematomas, bleeding complications, and other safety endpoints. The study includes stratification based on heparin administration and sheath size to ensure robust and nuanced data analysis., Results: We anticipate that early mobilization will lead to higher patient satisfaction scores. We also expect to closely monitor and report the incidence of hematomas, pain medication use, healthcare costs, patient outcomes at 30 days, time to ambulation, and hospital readmissions or emergency visits related to groin complications., Conclusion: The ZEBRA study is poised to fill a critical knowledge gap in postprocedure care in EP labs. By rigorously evaluating the impact of early mobilization on patient satisfaction and safety, this study could significantly influence future guidelines and improve patient experiences in EP procedures., (© 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The impact of lead fixation mechanism on extractability is poorly characterized., Objective: We aimed to compare the technical difficulty of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of active vs passive fixation right ventricular (RV) leads., Methods: A total of 408 patients who underwent RV TLE by a single expert electrophysiologist at Oregon Health & Science University between October 2011 and June 2022 were identified and retrospectively analyzed; 331 (81%) had active fixation RV leads and 77 (19%) had passive fixation RV leads. The active fixation cohort was further stratified into those with successfully retracted helices (n = 181) and failed helix retraction (n = 109). A numerical system (0-9) devised using 6 procedural criteria quantified a technical extraction score (TES) for each RV TLE. The TES was compared between groups., Results: Helix retraction was successful in ≥55% of active fixation TLEs. The mean TES for active-helix retracted, active-helix non-retracted, and passive fixation groups was 1.8, 3.5, and 3.7, respectively. The TES of the active-helix retracted group was significantly lower than those of the active-helix non-retracted group (adjusted P < .01) and the passive fixation group (adjusted P < .01). There was no significant difference in TES between the passive fixation and active-helix non-retracted groups in multivariate analysis ( P = .18). The TLE success rate of the entire cohort was >97%, with a major complication rate of 0.5%., Conclusion: TLE of active fixation leads where helical retraction is achieved presents fewer technical challenges than does passive fixation RV lead extraction; however, if the helix cannot be retracted, active and passive TLE procedures present similar technical challenges., (© 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) is known to have clinical benefits over conventional CRT, but the mechanisms are unclear., Objective: Compare effects of aCRT and conventional CRT on electrical dyssynchrony., Methods: A prospective, double-blind, 1:1 parallel-group assignment randomized controlled trial in patients receiving CRT for routine clinical indications. Participants underwent cardiac computed tomography and 128-electrode body surface mapping. The primary outcome was change in electrical dyssynchrony measured on the epicardial surface using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging before and 6 months post-CRT. Ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU) was calculated as the difference between the mean left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) activation times. An electrical dyssynchrony index (EDI) was computed as the standard deviation of local epicardial activation times., Results: We randomized 27 participants (aged 64 ± 12 years; 34% female; 53% ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 28% ± 8%; QRS duration 155 ± 21 ms; typical left bundle branch block [LBBB] in 13%) to conventional CRT (n = 15) vs aCRT (n = 12). In atypical LBBB (n = 11; 41%) with S waves in V 5 -V 6 , conduction block occurred in the anterior RV, as opposed to the interventricular groove in strict LBBB. As compared to baseline, VEU reduced post-CRT in the aCRT (median reduction 18.9 [interquartile range 4.3-29.2 ms; P = .034]), but not in the conventional CRT (21.4 [-30.0 to 49.9 ms; P = .525]) group. There were no differences in the degree of change in VEU and EDI indices between treatment groups., Conclusion: The effect of aCRT and conventional CRT on electrical dyssynchrony is largely similar, but only aCRT harmoniously reduced interventricular dyssynchrony by reducing RV uncoupling., (© 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Late lead perforation (LLP), defined as perforation ≥30 days from cardiac implantable electronic device implant, is a rare diagnosis and little data exist regarding management practices and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence, safety, and efficacy of transvenous management of clinically significant LLP., Methods: The electronic medical records of a single-center tertiary hospital were reviewed for all patients who were referred for LLP or its sequelae., Results: Eleven consecutive patients were identified from October 2011 to December 2018 with clinically significant LLP. Patients most often presented with pericardial symptoms with the exception of one asymptomatic patient. The median time from lead implant to intervention for LLP was 246 days. Nine patients were managed with an initial transvenous approach, with one requiring sternotomy (lead 6.3 years old). Two patients had a surgical approach, one performed at an outside hospital with subsequent death and another had a mini-thoracotomy, but the lead was removed percutaneously with no surgical repair. In this small cohort, there was no association between the lead extending beyond the parietal pericardium and surgical repair (P = .99)., Conclusion: Our single-center experience suggests that LLP can be initially managed with a cautious transvenous approach in most patients, but intraprocedural ultrasound for pericardial monitoring and a rescue plan with immediate surgical back up is mandatory., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is an attractive agent for procedural sedation due to its unique pharmacodynamic profile, specifically affording predictable sedation without concurrent respiratory depression. However, Dex has previously been reported to prevent or terminate arrhythmias. The purpose of this study was to investigate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) inducibility and homeostatic stability during electrophysiology studies (EPSs) and ablation when a standardized Dex protocol was used as the primary sedation agent., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 163 consecutive procedures for PSVT ablation that received Dex as the primary sedative with adjunct fentanyl and midazolam boluses (DEX-FENT-MIDAZ). This cohort was compared to 163 consecutive control procedures wherein strictly fentanyl and midazolam were used for sedation. The primary outcome reviewed was PSVT inducibility assessed before ablation. Reviewed secondary outcomes included level of sedation and intraprocedure hemodynamics and oxygenation., Results: The arrhythmia profiles of the DEX-FENT-MIDAZ and control cohorts were very similar. The overall incidence of a "negative" EPSs in which arrhythmia was not induced was 24% in the DEX-FENT-MIDAZ group and 26% in the control group (P = .7). Unintended deep sedation was significantly less with DEX-FENT-MIDAZ (4.3% vs 27%; P ≤ .0001). However, DEX-FENT-MIDAZ use was associated with a higher incidence of intraprocedure hypotension., Conclusions: Dex sedation during EPSs is not associated with a reduction in PSVT inducibility. The therapeutic utility of Dex during EPS arises from the predictable sedation Dex affords but is associated with an increased incidence of intraprocedure hypotension.

Introduction: Dual external direct current cardioversion (dual-DCCV) is a rhythm control strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), involving simultaneous delivery of two shocks from two defibrillators. The long-term effectiveness of this approach has not been studied in the biphasic cardioversion era., Methods: Seventy-seven consecutive patients at a single center were identified to receive dual-DCCV at the time of their initial cardioversion for AF, when maximum output standard external direct current cardioversion failed in two vectors. Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for dual-DCCV in a historical control group of 77 patients undergoing standard cardioversion and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare time to AF recurrence., Results: The dual-DCCV group had a significantly larger body mass index (BMI), but similar AF duration and left atrial size as controls. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that BMI and absence of prior paroxysmal AF were risk factors for dual-DCCV (P < 0.05). There was no difference observed between dual-DCCV and control groups (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.57; P = .12) after adjusting for number of shocks and age. Transient hypoxia was the only acute complication in either group (P > .999)., Conclusion: Dual-DCCV appears to be a safe and effective cardioversion strategy for patients with AF. The need for dual-DCCV in the treatment of AF appears to be influenced more by body habitus than atrial substrate., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

What We Already Know About This Topic: Electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery may disrupt implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Current management recommendations by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Heart Rhythm Society are based on expert clinical opinion since there is a paucity of data regarding the risk of electromagnetic interference to implantable cardioverter defibrillators during surgery., What This Article Tells Us That Is New: With protocolized electrosurgery dispersive electrode positioning in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference was 7% in above-the-umbilicus noncardiac surgery and 0% in below-the-umbilicus surgery. In cardiac surgery, clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with use of an underbody dispersive electrode was 29%.Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in above-the-umbilicus surgery is high, supporting recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy when monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus.With protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risk of electromagnetic interference in below-the-umbilicus surgery is negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy might be unnecessary in these cases.With an underbody dispersive electrode, the risk of electromagnetic interference in cardiac surgery is high., Background: The goal of this study was to determine the occurrence of intraoperative electromagnetic interference from monopolar electrosurgery in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing surgery. A protocolized approach was used to position the dispersive electrode., Methods: This was a prospective cohort study including 144 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators undergoing surgery between May 2012 and September 2016 at an academic medical center. The primary objectives were to determine the occurrences of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference (interference that would have resulted in delivery of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy had the antitachycardia therapy not been programmed off) in noncardiac surgeries above the umbilicus, noncardiac surgeries at or below the umbilicus, and cardiac surgeries with the use of an underbody dispersive electrode., Results: The risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference were 14 of 70 (20%) and 5 of 70 (7%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery, 1 of 40 (2.5%) and 0 of 40 (0%) in below-the-umbilicus surgery, and 23 of 34 (68%) and 10 of 34 (29%) in cardiac surgery. Had conservative programming strategies intended to reduce the risk of inappropriate antitachycardia therapy been employed, the occurrence of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference would have been 2 of 70 (2.9%) in above-the-umbilicus surgery and 3 of 34 (8.8%) in cardiac surgery., Conclusions: Despite protocolized dispersive electrode positioning, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with surgery above the umbilicus were high, supporting published recommendations to suspend antitachycardia therapy whenever monopolar electrosurgery is used above the umbilicus. For surgery below the umbilicus, these risks were negligible, implying that suspending antitachycardia therapy is likely unnecessary in these patients. For cardiac surgery, the risks of electromagnetic interference and clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference with an underbody dispersive electrode were high. Conservative programming strategies would not have eliminated the risk of clinically meaningful electromagnetic interference in either noncardiac surgery above the umbilicus or cardiac surgery.