1. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: A single-center experience using the plerixa for pre-emptive approach
- Author
-
Ahmad S. Alsaeed, Mona J. Najib, Sameer M. Al Amoudi, Ihab Y. Elhemaidi, Ahmed A. Absi, Majed D. Al Ahmadi, Saleem K. Eldadah, Walaa A. Rajkhan, Manar M. Khalil, and Mohammed H. Almohammadi
- Subjects
Adult ,Benzylamines ,Lymphoma ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,Antigens, CD34 ,General Medicine ,Cyclams ,Transplantation, Autologous ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ,Heterocyclic Compounds ,Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ,Humans ,Multiple Myeloma ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
To review and assess the efficiency of pre-emptive plerixafor administration for poor mobilization (PM) and to review and assess mobilization efficiency (≥2×10This retrospective study evaluated all patients with MM and lymphoma undergoing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and collection at our institution between February 2014 and August 2021. Plerixafor was administered pre-emptively by a plateau of10 peripheral blood CD34+/µl after chemotherapy-based mobilization or CD34+ of8/µL on day 4 after mobilization with G-CSF alone. Between peak CD34+ levels of 10-15/µl, plerixafor will be used at the discretion of the treating physician.In total, 215 patients were enrolled. Among them, 80% had peak CD34+ level ≥20/µL, 11% had clear poor mobilization (peak CD34+ levels10/µL), and 9% had borderline PM (CD34+ between 10-19/µL). Plerixafor was administered pre-emptively in 13% of the patients and 75% of patients with borderline PM were collected without plerixafor, suggesting that plerixafor is not needed if CD34+15/µL on the anticipated collection day. Mobilization failed in only one patient (1%).Our data showed that with plerixafor pre-emptive administration, the primary endpoint was achieved for most patients identified with PM, preventing the need for a second mobilization attempt.
- Published
- 2021