Search

This study investigated the prognostic impact of vitamin D deficiency and reduced skeletal muscle mass in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. A retrospective analysis of 186 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients from 2012 to 2022 was conducted, measuring serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and the skeletal muscle index (SMI). Decreased vitamin D levels were linked to more severe DLBCL disease, with a median 25(OH)D concentration of 13 (4.0–27) ng/mL. Males in the group with a low SMI had a considerably lower 25(OH)D concentration. The optimal threshold of 25(OH)D levels for overall survival (OS) was 9.6 ng/mL, with lower values associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence and mortality. Multivariable analysis showed hazard ratios for OS of 1.4 [95% CI 0.77–2.5] for a low SMI and 3.2 [95% CI 1.8–5.8] for low 25(OH)D concentration. The combination of a low SMI and low vitamin D concentration resulted in the worst prognosis. Thus, low levels of vitamin D associated with disease progression significantly impact DLBCL prognosis, which can be further stratified by the SMI, providing valuable insights for patient management and potential therapeutic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The p14ARF-Hdm2-p53 signaling pathway targets tumor growth suppression, inhibits clonal proliferation, and maintains genome stability. It is inactivated in most human malignancies. The p14ARF protein is one of the main participants in the cascade. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic value of the number of p14ARF-expressing tumor cells in biopsies of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Material and methods. The formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples of tumor tissue of 104 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were included to the study. The relative number of cells expressing p14ARF was determined by immunohistochemical and morphometric methods. Differences in the content of p14ARF-positive tumor cells between groups of patients divided according to clinical and laboratory parameters were determined using the Mann–Whitney U test. Prediction of an unfavorable response to therapy was carried out using binary logistic regression with calculation of the odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval; variables were selected using Wald backward elimination method. The risk of an event occurring was calculated using Cox regression analysis. Results. The content of p14ARF-positive cells is higher in tumor biopsies of patients with high and high-intermediate risk according to the international prognostic index than in patients with low and lowintermediate risk. A relationship between an increase in the number of p14ARF-positive tumor cells, the absence of a complete response to first-line R-CHOP therapy, and an increased risk of death in patients with DLBCL has been established. Conclusions. The studied marker p14ARF can be used as an additional morphological predictor of the unfavorable course of DLBCL.

Secondary central nervous system involvement (sCNSi) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is fatal. However, its features in patients with sCNSi who are categorized as lower risk by international prognostic index (IPI) or CNS-IPI are not yet fully understood. In the present analysis, we evaluated DLBCL patients who developed sCNSi at their first progression and who participated in JCOG0601, most of whom were lower risk by IPI. Of 409 patients, 21 (5.1%) developed sCNSi during a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Five-year cumulative incidence of sCNSi were 5.1%; and 4.0%, 5.3%, and 11.5% at low, intermediate, and high risk of CNS-IPI, respectively. The most common locations of extranodal lesions at the time of registration in patients with sCNSi were the stomach (n = 4), paranasal cavity (n = 3), and bone marrow (n = 2). In univariable analysis, paranasal cavity lesion was a high-risk factor for sCNSi (subdistribution hazard ratio, 4.34 [95% confidence interval 1.28–14.73]). Median overall survival after sCNSi was 1.3 years, with a 2-year overall survival rate of 39.3%. The incidence of sCNSi in DLBCL patients at lower risk of CNS-IPI was low, as previously reported, but paranasal cavity lesion might indicate high risk for organ involvement. Clinical trial registration: JCOG0601 was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000000929, date of registration; December 04, 2007) and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180139, date of registration; February 20, 2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iB-NHL) with monoclonal immunoglobulin (McIg). Methods The clinical and pathological data of 82 newly diagnosed iB-NHL patients in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from November 2013 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE), they were divided into McIg positive group (30 cases) and negative group (52 cases). The clinical characteristics, laboratory examination results and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results iB-NHL with McIg were more common in males, with IgM-κ being the most common, and the clinical stage was mostly stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ, with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) as the main stage. Compared with the negative group, patients in the positive group were more likely to have bone marrow infiltration, international prognostic index (IPI)≥3, decreased white blood cell count, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated globulin and cystatin C (P＜0.05). Cox univariate analysis showed that IPI≥3 and McIg positivity were associated with worse OS in patients. Multivariate analysis showed that McIg positivity was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS of patients (HR=0.074, 95%CI: 0.009-0.609, P=0.015). Follow-up ended on October 31, 2021. The median OS of the positive group was 52 months, but the median OS of the patients without McIg was not reached, and the difference of OS between two groups had statistical significance (P＜0.01). Conclusion Among the newly diagnosed patients with iB-NHL, the prognosis of patients with McIg is relatively poor, which needs to be paid more attention in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

This study investigated the prognostic impact of vitamin D deficiency and reduced skeletal muscle mass in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. A retrospective analysis of 186 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients from 2012 to 2022 was conducted, measuring serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and the skeletal muscle index (SMI). Decreased vitamin D levels were linked to more severe DLBCL disease, with a median 25(OH)D concentration of 13 (4.0–27) ng/mL. Males in the group with a low SMI had a considerably lower 25(OH)D concentration. The optimal threshold of 25(OH)D levels for overall survival (OS) was 9.6 ng/mL, with lower values associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence and mortality. Multivariable analysis showed hazard ratios for OS of 1.4 [95% CI 0.77–2.5] for a low SMI and 3.2 [95% CI 1.8–5.8] for low 25(OH)D concentration. The combination of a low SMI and low vitamin D concentration resulted in the worst prognosis. Thus, low levels of vitamin D associated with disease progression significantly impact DLBCL prognosis, which can be further stratified by the SMI, providing valuable insights for patient management and potential therapeutic interventions.

Objective: The existing Central Nervous System-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) provides insufficient guidance for predicting central nervous system (CNS) relapse in individuals with primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective cohort study sought to examine the potential of the stage-modified IPI in predicting CNS relapse within this specific patient population. Patients and methods: We examined the baseline characteristics of 76 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary breast DLBCL, calculating the stage-modified IPI score for each individual. Utilizing a competing risk regression (CRR) model, we conducted both univariate and multivariate analyses to explore the relationship between potential prognostic factors and the occurrence of CNS relapse. Results: In our cohort, the rates of CNS disease at 2 and 5 years since the diagnosis of primary breast DLBCL are 3.9% and 7.8%, respectively. Among patients experiencing CNS relapse, 80% presented with a parenchymal brain mass. Individuals with a high stage-modified IPI score (1–3 points) had a significantly higher incidence of CNS relapse (p = 0.031), a shorter time from the initial diagnosis of primary breast DLBCL to the first CNS relapse (p = 0.010), as well as relapse at any site (p = 0.012), compared to those with a low score (0 points). Univariate analysis identified stage (Hazard Ratio (HR): 4.098, p = 0.024), stage-modified IPI score (HR: 11.582, p = 0.012), and radiation therapy (HR: 5.784, p = 0.026) as significant risk factors. In multivariate analysis, in addition to radiation therapy (HR: 7.258, p = 0.012), the stage-modified IPI score (1–3 points versus 0 points) emerged as an independent and reliable predictor for CNS relapse (HR: 12.945, p = 0.016). Conclusion: Our study underscores the significance of stage-modified IPI scores in predicting CNS relapse for patients with primary breast DLBCL. Validation of these findings through further research is essential, along with exploring potential prevention and intervention approaches.

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent aggressive lymphoma seen in clinical practice. Despite huge strides in understanding its biology, front‐line therapy has remained unchanged for decades. Roughly one‐third of patients have primary refractory or relapse following the end of conventional first‐line therapy. The outcome of patients with primary refractory disease and those with early relapse (defined as relapse less than 1 year from the end of therapy) is markedly inferior to those with later relapse and is exemplified by dismal overall survival. In this article, the authors term patients with features that identify them as being at particularly high‐risk for either primary refractory disease or early relapse, as 'ultra‐high‐risk'. As new treatment options become established (e.g. bispecific T‐cell engagers, chimeric antigen receptor 'CAR' T‐cells and antibody–drug conjugates), it is likely that there will be a push to incorporate some of these agents into the first‐line setting for patients identified as ultra‐high‐risk. In this review, the authors outline advances in positron emission tomography, widely available laboratory assays and clinical prognosticators, which can detect a high proportion of patients with ultra‐high‐risk disease. Since these approaches are pragmatic and able to be adopted widely, they could be incorporated into routine clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Khalid Halahleh,1 Abeer Yaseen,1 Isra Muradi,2 Akram Al-Ibraheem,3 Iyad Sultan,4 Mohammad Ma’koseh1 1Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; 2Department of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya; 3Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan; 4Department of Pediatric Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Mohammad Ma’koseh, Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan, Tel +962-6 5300460, Ext 1146, Email mm.09744@khcc.joPurpose: Primary mediastinal large B-cell Lymphoma (PMLBCL) is a rare aggressive lymphoma with unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features. The optimal frontline therapy is subject of ongoing debate. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of PMLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) at King Hussein Cancer Center.Patients and Methods: Adult patients > 18 years of age with PMLBCL treated with RCHOP from January 2011 to July 2020 were identified. All demographics, disease and treatment related variables were retrospectively collected. Correlations of clinical and laboratory variables with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses using backward stepwise Cox regression models. The PFS and OS were plotted using Kaplan‒Meier curves.Results: 49 patients were included with a median age of 29 years. 14 (28.6%) had stage III or IV, 31 (63.3%) had mediastinal bulky disease. International prognostic index (IPI) was 0– 1 in 35 (71.4%). Radiotherapy was given to 32 (65.3%) patients. End of treatment (EOT) response was complete (CR) in 32 (65.3%), partial response (PR) in 8 (16.3%) and progressive disease (PD) in 9 (18.4%). Patients who achieved CR at EOT, compared favorably with those who did not in regard to 4-year OS (92.5% vs 26.9%, p=< 0.001). Overall objective response to salvage chemotherapies was 26.7%. At a median follow-up of 46 months, 4-year PFS and OS were 60% and 71% respectively. In multivariate analysis, IPI > one correlated with the EOT response (p=0.009), PFS (p=0.004) and OS (p= 0.019).Conclusion: In PMLBCL, RCHOP chemotherapy backbone in the frontline therapy is suboptimal but can be used in patients with low IPI. Adapting more intensive chemoimmunotherapy regimens may be considered for patients with high IPI. Salvage chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.Keywords: international prognostic index, end of treatment response, radiotherapy, salvage chemotherapy

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients needing new alternative regimens in first-line treatment should be selected with better risk classification. After International Prognostic Index (IPI), Revised-IPI (R-IPI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI, and Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)-IPI, have been developed to improve risk predictions. This study compared performances of four prognostic indices concerning differentiation of overall survival (OS), the most critical endpoint. The study was conducted on 116 patients diagnosed with DLBCL. Patients with primary nervous system and testicular DLBCL, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, were excluded. The fitting of prognostic indices for database and the prediction of patient discrimination were compared using Akaike's information criterion and concordance index. Of the study cohort, 63.8% were male, the median age was 56 (18-88), and median follow-up term was 45.6 (0.3-75.2) months. All factors, constituting IPI and R-IPI scores, demonstrated a significant difference in OS. Involvements of the extranodal regions specified in NCCN-IPI and elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin levels in GELTAMO-IPI had prognostic significance (p= 0.005 and p= 0.040, respectively). Each of the four prognostic indices, resulted in risk groups with significantly different OS. R-IPI provided the best fit for database, while NCCN-IPI provided the best discrimination between patients with high and low OS. Although NCCN-IPI provides the best discrimination between patients with short and long OS, using original IPI still seems acceptable in the rituximab era. Integration of tumor molecular characteristics into NCCN-IPI may better characterize high-risk group in new treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. The standard first-line therapy for DLBCL consists of rituximab cyclophosphamide doxorubicin vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). About 50–70% of patients may be cured by R-CHOP. There was no data on external validation and comparison of the international prognostic index, revised-IPI (R-IPI), and enhanced-IPI (NCCN-IPI) to predict treatment outcomes in the middle-income country with a resourced-limited setting.Objectives We aimed to externally validate and compare IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI in predicting 2-year progression-free survival (2-y PFS) of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP.Methods This ambispective observational study recruited consecutive patients diagnosed between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2020, with the last follow-up on 1 July 2022 from Thammasat University Hospital and Ramathibodi Hospital. We assessed discrimination by Harrell‘s concordance index (c-index), calibration by calibration plot, and absolute difference in survival (ADS) between the lowest-and the highest-risk groups.Results The cohort of 292 patients (median age 63 years and median follow-up 3.6 years) had 131 progressions and 96 deaths. The 2-y PFS was 63%. The c-indices were NCCN-IPI 0.6216, R-IPI 0.6004 (P = 0.215), and IPI 0.6104 (P = 0.463). The calibration plots of NCCN-IPI and R-IPI showed nearly perfect agreement (moderate strength), while IPI had miscalibrations. The ADSs were NCCN-IPI 52%, R-IPI 42%, and IPI 25%.Conclusion NCCN-IPI is the best prognostic index compared to IPI and R-IPI in prior studies. However, the prognostic model for DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP requires updating or integrating biomarkers to improve discrimination to the acceptable level (c-index 0.7).

Abstract Purpose We investigated the prognostic value of pretreatment patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving obinutuzumab/rituximab plus chemotherapy in the GOYA phase III study. Methods Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and the Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy‐Lymphoma (FACT–Lym) lymphoma subscale (LYMS) during the study. PRO scales with high prognostic value were identified through Cox regression analyses of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). These scales were evaluated in terms of their additional prognostic value beyond the International Prognostic Index (IPI). A preliminary assessment was performed to evaluate whether the scales provided improved patient‐risk stratification beyond IPI. Results One thousand two hundred and fifty‐nine patients with valid pretreatment PRO scales were included in the analyses, and complete pretreatment data were available for 1239/1414 patients (87.6%). Four PRO scales with high prognostic value were identified: FACT–Lym LYMS and EORTC QLQ‐C30 physical functioning, global health status/quality of life (QoL), and fatigue. All four scales retained significant prognostic value for OS and PFS after IPI adjustment (all p

Abstract Background This study aimed to propose a new user-friendly, cost effective and robust risk model to facilitate risk stratification for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with frontline R-CHOP regimens. Methods Data on 998 patients with de novo DLBCL diagnosed between Jan 1st, 2005 and Dec 31st, 2018 at our center, who received frontline R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens, were retrospectively collected. Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 701) and the validation cohort (n = 297). A new prognostic model for overall survival (OS) was built based on the training cohort. The performance of the new model was compared with International prognostic index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI (NCCN-IPI). The new model was validated in the validation cohort. Results The multivariate analysis of the training cohort showed that the IPI, β2-microglobulin, platelet count and red blood cell distribution width were independent factors for OS, which were incorporated into the new prognostic model. Patients were stratified into low risk, low-intermediate risk, high-intermediate risk, high risk and very high risk groups, with distinct survival outcomes. The new model achieved good C-indexes for 5-year OS prediction of 0.750 (95%CI 0.719–0.781) and 0.733 (95%CI 0.682–0.784) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, and displayed well-fitted calibration curves. The C-index and the time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated better performance of the new model than the IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in both training and validation cohorts. The integrated Brier score for predicting 5-year OS of the new model was lower than that of the IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in both cohorts, and decision curve analysis also showed a higher net benefit, indicating the superiority of the new model over the conventional models. Conclusion The new prognostic model might be a useful predictive tool for DLBCL treated with R-CHOP regimens. Further external validation is warranted.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. The standard first-line therapy for DLBCL consists of rituximab cyclophosphamide doxorubicin vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). About 50–70% of patients may be cured by R-CHOP. There was no data on external validation and comparison of the international prognostic index, revised-IPI (R-IPI), and enhanced-IPI (NCCN-IPI) to predict treatment outcomes in the middle-income country with a resourced-limited setting. We aimed to externally validate and compare IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI in predicting 2-year progression-free survival (2-y PFS) of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. This ambispective observational study recruited consecutive patients diagnosed between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2020, with the last follow-up on 1 July 2022 from Thammasat University Hospital and Ramathibodi Hospital. We assessed discrimination by Harrell's concordance index (c-index), calibration by calibration plot, and absolute difference in survival (ADS) between the lowest-and the highest-risk groups. The cohort of 292 patients (median age 63 years and median follow-up 3.6 years) had 131 progressions and 96 deaths. The 2-y PFS was 63%. The c-indices were NCCN-IPI 0.6216, R-IPI 0.6004 (P = 0.215), and IPI 0.6104 (P = 0.463). The calibration plots of NCCN-IPI and R-IPI showed nearly perfect agreement (moderate strength), while IPI had miscalibrations. The ADSs were NCCN-IPI 52%, R-IPI 42%, and IPI 25%. NCCN-IPI is the best prognostic index compared to IPI and R-IPI in prior studies. However, the prognostic model for DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP requires updating or integrating biomarkers to improve discrimination to the acceptable level (c-index 0.7). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prognostic information is essential in finding the right treatment. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL. Methods: Patients with DLBCL, treated with first-line R-CHOP, were retrospectively analyzed in groups of high (>70%) and low (≤70%) Ki-67. Parameters of interest were the international prognostic index (IPI), treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was conducted to analyze categorical variables. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were applied for survival analyses. Finally, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed, including gender, Ki-67 ≤ 70% or >70%, IPI and presence of B symptoms. Results: Overall, 58 patients were included. No significant association was found between Ki-67 status and IPI (p = 0.148) or treatment response (p = 0.373). Survival in patients with high Ki-67 was significantly inferior with respect to OS (p = 0.047) but not PFS (p = 0.138). Multivariate linear regression, however, yielded only IPI as a risk factor for OS. Conclusion: Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed in order to elucidate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.

This study shows that the clinical and biologic characteristics of adult patients with BL and BLL were similar to those of patients from the BL-IPI cohort. Consequently, the BL-IPI was validated in our series of patients with BL and BLL. Keywords: Burkitt lymphoma; prognosis; International Prognostic Index; validation EN Burkitt lymphoma prognosis International Prognostic Index validation 1993 1996 4 08/22/22 20220801 NES 220801 Chemoimmunotherapy including rituximab and high-dose or infusional chemotherapy constitute the standard treatment for patients with Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) or Burkitt's lymphoma and leukemia (BLL) [[1], [3]]. [Extracted from the article]

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a simplified nutritional index calculated from serum albumin, total cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of the CONUT score on overall survival (OS) in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). A multicenter, retrospective cohort study including 99 patients with PTCL was conducted. The CONUT score was significantly higher in the non-survivor group (median 5, range 0-12) than in the survivor group (median 3, range 0-11; p = 0.026). The CONUT score was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio 1.119, 95% confidence interval 1.021-1.227, p = 0.017). No significant effect-modification by the International Prognostic Index (IPI) was observed, and the CONUT score affected the prognosis of PTCL regardless of the IPI (P for interaction = 0.208). In conclusion, the CONUT score is an independent prognostic factor for PTCL irrespective of IPI category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to propose a new user-friendly, cost effective and robust risk model to facilitate risk stratification for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with frontline R-CHOP regimens.Methods: Data on 998 patients with de novo DLBCL diagnosed between Jan 1st, 2005 and Dec 31st, 2018 at our center, who received frontline R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens, were retrospectively collected. Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 701) and the validation cohort (n = 297). A new prognostic model for overall survival (OS) was built based on the training cohort. The performance of the new model was compared with International prognostic index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI (NCCN-IPI). The new model was validated in the validation cohort.Results: The multivariate analysis of the training cohort showed that the IPI, β2-microglobulin, platelet count and red blood cell distribution width were independent factors for OS, which were incorporated into the new prognostic model. Patients were stratified into low risk, low-intermediate risk, high-intermediate risk, high risk and very high risk groups, with distinct survival outcomes. The new model achieved good C-indexes for 5-year OS prediction of 0.750 (95%CI 0.719-0.781) and 0.733 (95%CI 0.682-0.784) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, and displayed well-fitted calibration curves. The C-index and the time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated better performance of the new model than the IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in both training and validation cohorts. The integrated Brier score for predicting 5-year OS of the new model was lower than that of the IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in both cohorts, and decision curve analysis also showed a higher net benefit, indicating the superiority of the new model over the conventional models.Conclusion: The new prognostic model might be a useful predictive tool for DLBCL treated with R-CHOP regimens. Further external validation is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the prognosis of DLBCL patients is widely affected by multivariables. Clinical-factors-based prognostic systems stratify the prognosis of DLBCL with certain limitations, and the value of ferritin on the prognosis of DLBCL is unclear. In this study, 225 cases were retrieved from 4 centers of Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group (HHLWG) as the derivation cohort, and 66 cases were from the other 6 centers of HHLWG as external validation cohort. X-Tile program divided ferritin into three groups when applying 175.00 and 391.90 μg/L as the optimal cutoff points. Based on multivariable analysis, ferritin appeared to be a stronger predictor. A total of three variables (ferritin, age, and lactate dehydrogenase) were included for the development of the nomogram. The C-indexes were 0.73 and 0.70 in the derivation and validation cohort, and the calibration curve showed the consistency between the nomogram prediction and the actual observation. In conclusion, Ferritin-based nomogram enhanced the prognostic value of IPI in DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The prognosis of an early relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) appears to be poor following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this study is to contribute data to the open question on whether additional radiotherapy can improve the outcome. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients with an early relapse (median 4 months after the end of initial immunochemotherapy, range 1–11) of DLBCL have been treated in our institution with high-dose therapy (usually the BEAM protocol) and ASCT since 2008 (median age 61 years, range 28–73). Twenty-three patients received ASCT in a second treatment line, 25 in a third line (19 refractory to second-line salvage therapy, 5 after second relapse). Fifteen of these 48 patients received radiotherapy (36–50 Gy, median 40) of residual masses after ASCT. Results: Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line ASCT were 61 and 57%, after third-line ASCT 47 and 44%, respectively, without significant differences. A prognostic factor was the International Prognostic Index (IPI) at the start of salvage therapy. Three-year OS and PFS in low-risk patients were 69 and 69%, in low-intermediate-risk 63 and 53%, and in high-intermediate-risk 23 and 23%, respectively (p = 0.033). Twenty-three patients achieved a sustained complete remission (13–146 months, median 62). Conclusion: Sustained long-term remissions can be achieved in patients with early relapse of DLBCL following ASCT in a second or third treatment line, particularly in patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk IPI, following radiotherapy of residual disease after ASCT. Further investigations are required to clarify which patients need an alternative therapy (potentially CAR T‑cells or allogeneic transplantation). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the prognosis of DLBCL patients is widely affected by multivariables. Clinical-factors-based prognostic systems stratify the prognosis of DLBCL with certain limitations, and the value of ferritin on the prognosis of DLBCL is unclear. In this study, 225 cases were retrieved from 4 centers of Huaihai Lymphoma Working Group (HHLWG) as the derivation cohort, and 66 cases were from the other 6 centers of HHLWG as external validation cohort. X-Tile program divided ferritin into three groups when applying 175.00 and 391.90 μg/L as the optimal cutoff points. Based on multivariable analysis, ferritin appeared to be a stronger predictor. A total of three variables (ferritin, age, and lactate dehydrogenase) were included for the development of the nomogram. The C-indexes were 0.73 and 0.70 in the derivation and validation cohort, and the calibration curve showed the consistency between the nomogram prediction and the actual observation. In conclusion, Ferritin-based nomogram enhanced the prognostic value of IPI in DLBCL.

The baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI) is not sufficient for the initial risk stratification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The aims of this study were to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in DLBCL and develop a new stratification system that combines an interim evaluation and IPI. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 314 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with baseline and interim evaluations. All patients were treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens as the first-line therapy. Survival differences were evaluated for different risk stratification systems including the IPI, interim evaluation, and the combined system. When stratified by IPI, the high-intermediate and high-risk groups presented overlapping survival curves with no significant differences, and the high-risk group still had >50% of 3-year overall survival (OS). The interim evaluation can also stratify patients into three groups, as 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were not significantly different. The SD and PD patients had significantly lower 3-year OS and PFS rates than complete remission and partial response patients, but the percentage of these patients was only ~10%. The IPI and interim evaluation combined risk stratification system separated the patients into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. The 3-year OS rates were 96.4%, 86.7%, 46.4%, and 40%, while the 3-year PFS rates were 87.1%, 71.5%, 42.5%, and 7.2%. The OS comparison between the high-risk group and very high-risk group was marginally significant, and OS and PFS comparisons between any other two groups were significantly different. This combined risk stratification system could be a useful tool for the prognostic prediction of DLBCL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prognostic information is essential in finding the right treatment. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL. Methods: Patients with DLBCL, treated with first-line R-CHOP, were retrospectively analyzed in groups of high (>70%) and low (≤70%) Ki-67. Parameters of interest were the international prognostic index (IPI), treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was conducted to analyze categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were applied for survival analyses. Finally, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed, including gender, Ki-67 ≤ 70% or >70%, IPI and presence of B symptoms. Results: Overall, 58 patients were included. No significant association was found between Ki-67 status and IPI (p = 0.148) or treatment response (p = 0.373). Survival in patients with high Ki-67 was significantly inferior with respect to OS (p = 0.047) but not PFS (p = 0.138). Multivariate linear regression, however, yielded only IPI as a risk factor for OS. Conclusion: Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed in order to elucidate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI) is not sufficient for the initial risk stratification of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The aims of this study were to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in DLBCL and develop a new stratification system that combines an interim evaluation and IPI. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 314 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with baseline and interim evaluations. All patients were treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens as the first-line therapy. Survival differences were evaluated for different risk stratification systems including the IPI, interim evaluation, and the combined system. When stratified by IPI, the high-intermediate and high-risk groups presented overlapping survival curves with no significant differences, and the high-risk group still had >50% of 3-year overall survival (OS). The interim evaluation can also stratify patients into three groups, as 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were not significantly different. The SD and PD patients had significantly lower 3-year OS and PFS rates than complete remission and partial response patients, but the percentage of these patients was only ~10%. The IPI and interim evaluation combined risk stratification system separated the patients into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. The 3-year OS rates were 96.4%, 86.7%, 46.4%, and 40%, while the 3-year PFS rates were 87.1%, 71.5%, 42.5%, and 7.2%. The OS comparison between the high-risk group and very high-risk group was marginally significant, and OS and PFS comparisons between any other two groups were significantly different. This combined risk stratification system could be a useful tool for the prognostic prediction of DLBCL patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor affects the invasiveness of solid tumors by regulating angiogenesis. However, it is not clear whether VEGF could be used to predict the prognosis of DLBCL in the era of rituximab-based immunotherapy. We conducted a retrospective study to explore response to therapy and the prognostic value of VEGF on DLBCL in the rituximab era. The subjects were 65 patients with a histological diagnosis of DLBCL from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative survival rate of patients with different VEGF and IPI levels, and comparisons between groups were made using the log-rank test. DLBCL patients with elevated VEGF were more likely to have extranodal involvement, advanced stage, Myc/Bcl-2 double expression, and a higher Ki-67 score. Elevated VEGF was associated with poor therapeutic response and survival. When patients were divided into low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high-risk groups using the V-IPI model based on VEGF and IPI, PFS rates were 94.4, 74.1, 40.6 and 14.8%, respectively. This model better identified low-risk patients than IPI (85.9, 88.9, 37 and 7.8%). Our results demonstrate that VEGF predicts therapeutic response in DLBCL and the V-IPI model accurately predicts PFS of low-risk DLBCL in the rituximab era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for outcomes among patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n = 100) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n = 128) who did not receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2008 and 2018. We designed a comparison of prognostic scores specifically for PTCL-NOS and AITL. The international prognostic index (IPI) was useful for investigating the risk factors associated with outcomes among transplant-ineligible patients with PTCL-NOS (Harrell's c-statistic 0.715) and AITL (c-statistic 0.615). The prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT), modified PIT, and the International Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma Project for overall survival (OS) seemed to identify separate prognostic groups, based on visual assessment of Kaplan–Meier curves. However, better c-statistics (>0.7) were only found for the IPI score for OS in PTCL-NOS. Strategies that carefully select PTCL patients with higher IPI scores may help to identify individuals suitable for novel therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We compared the International Prognostic Index (IPI), Revised (R)‐IPI and age‐adjusted (aa)‐IPI as prognostic indices for patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) R‐CHOP 14 versus 21 trial (N = 1080). The R‐IPI and aa‐IPI showed no marked improvement compared to the IPI for overall and progression‐free survival, in terms of model fit or discrimination. Similar results were observed in exploratory analyses incorporating the Grupo Español de Linfomas/Transplante de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)‐IPI, where baseline β2‐microglobulin data were available (N = 655). Although our findings support current use of the IPI, a novel prognostic tool to better delineate a high‐risk DLBCL group in the rituximab era is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The existing Central Nervous System-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) provides insufficient guidance for predicting central nervous system (CNS) relapse in individuals with primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective cohort study sought to examine the potential of the stage-modified IPI in predicting CNS relapse within this specific patient population., Patients and Methods: We examined the baseline characteristics of 76 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary breast DLBCL, calculating the stage-modified IPI score for each individual. Utilizing a competing risk regression (CRR) model, we conducted both univariate and multivariate analyses to explore the relationship between potential prognostic factors and the occurrence of CNS relapse., Results: In our cohort, the rates of CNS disease at 2 and 5 years since the diagnosis of primary breast DLBCL are 3.9% and 7.8%, respectively. Among patients experiencing CNS relapse, 80% presented with a parenchymal brain mass. Individuals with a high stage-modified IPI score (1-3 points) had a significantly higher incidence of CNS relapse (p = 0.031), a shorter time from the initial diagnosis of primary breast DLBCL to the first CNS relapse (p = 0.010), as well as relapse at any site (p = 0.012), compared to those with a low score (0 points). Univariate analysis identified stage (Hazard Ratio (HR): 4.098, p = 0.024), stage-modified IPI score (HR: 11.582, p = 0.012), and radiation therapy (HR: 5.784, p = 0.026) as significant risk factors. In multivariate analysis, in addition to radiation therapy (HR: 7.258, p = 0.012), the stage-modified IPI score (1-3 points versus 0 points) emerged as an independent and reliable predictor for CNS relapse (HR: 12.945, p = 0.016)., Conclusion: Our study underscores the significance of stage-modified IPI scores in predicting CNS relapse for patients with primary breast DLBCL. Validation of these findings through further research is essential, along with exploring potential prevention and intervention approaches., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) enrolled in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed to test the impact of quantitative parameters from interim PET/CT scans on overall (OS) and progression‐free (PFS) survival. We centrally reviewed baseline and interim PET/CT scans of 138 patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone given every 14 days (R‐CHOP14) in the SAKK38/07 trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00544219). Cutoff values for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic heterogeneity (MH) were defined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Responses were scored using the Deauville scale (DS). Patients with DS 5 at interim PET/CT (defined by uptake >2 times higher than in normal liver) had worse PFS (P = 0.014) and OS (P < 0.0001). A SUVmax reduction (Δ) greater than 66% was associated with longer PFS (P = 0.0027) and OS (P < 0.0001). Elevated SUVmax, MTV, TLG, and MH at interim PET/CT also identified patients with poorer outcome. At multivariable analysis, ΔSUVmax and baseline MTV appeared independent outcome predictors. A prognostic model integrating ΔSUVmax and baseline MTV discriminated three risk groups with significantly (log‐rank test for trend, P < 0.0001) different PFS and OS. Moreover, the integration of MH and clinical prognostic indices could further refine the prediction of OS. PET metrics‐derived prognostic models perform better than the international indices alone. Integration of baseline and interim PET metrics identified poor‐risk DLBCL patients who might benefit from alternative treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) who are negative for human immunodeficiency virus and human herpesvirus 8 are considered to have idiopathic MCD (iMCD). The clinical presentation of iMCD varies from mild constitutional symptoms to life‐threatening symptoms or death. The treatment strategy varies from "watchful waiting" to high‐dose chemotherapy. This diverse clinical presentation calls for a classification stratification system that takes into account the severity of the disease. Subjects, Materials, and Methods: We analyzed the clinical, laboratory, and pathologic abnormalities and treatment outcomes of 176 patients with iMCD (median follow‐up duration 12 years) from the U.S. and China to better understand the characteristics and prognostic factors of this disease. This discovery set of iMCD results was confirmed from the validation set composed of additional 197 patients with iMCD organized from The International Castleman Disease Consortium. Results: Using these data, we proposed and validated the iMCD international prognostic index (iMCD‐IPI), which includes parameters related to patient characteristics (age > 40 years), histopathologic features (plasma cell variant), and inflammatory consequences of iMCD (hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, hemoglobin <80 g/L, and pleural effusion). These five factors stratified patients according to their performance status and extent of organ dysfunction into three broad categories: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. The iMCD‐IPI score accurately predicted outcomes in the discovery study cohort, and the results were confirmed on the validation study cohort. Conclusion: This study represents the largest series of studies on patients with iMCD in the field and proposed a novel risk‐stratification model for iMCD‐IPI that could be used to guide risk‐stratified treatment strategies in patients with iMCD. Implications for Practice: Patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) can benefit from care based on clinical symptoms and disease severity. This study in 176 patients with iMCD constructed an iMCD‐IPI score based on five clinical factors, including age >40 years, plasmacytic variant subtype, hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, hemoglobin <80 g/L, and pleural effusion, and stratified patients into three risk categories: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. The predictive value was validated in an independent set of 197 patients with iMCD from The International Castleman Disease Consortium. The proposed novel model is valuable for predicting clinical outcome and selecting optimal therapies using clinical parameters. This cooperative study analyzed the clinical, laboratory, and pathologic variables of patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD), resulting in a proposal for an iMCD international prognostic index that can help physicians agree on a treatment algorithm for iMCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive heterogeneous lymphoma with standard treatment. However, 30%‐40% of patients still fail, so we should know which patients are candidates for alternative therapies. IPI is the main prognostic score but, in the rituximab era, it cannot identify a very high‐risk (HR) subset. The MD Anderson Cancer Center reported a score in the prerituximab era exclusively considering tumor‐related variables: Tumor Score (TS). We aim to validate TS in the rituximab era and to analyze its current potential role. Methods: From GELTAMO DLBCL registry, we selected those patients homogeneously treated with R‐CHOP (n = 1327). Results: Five‐years PFS and OS were 62% and 74%. All variables retained an independent prognostic role in the revised TS (R‐TS), identifying four different risk groups, with 5‐years PFS of 86%, 71%, 50%, and very HR (28%). With a further categorization of three variables of the original TS (Ann Arbor Stage, LDH and B2M), we generated a new index that allowed an improvement in HR assessment. Conclusions: (a) All variables of the original TS retain an independent prognostic role, and R‐TS remains predictive in the rituximab era; (b) R‐TS and additional categorization of LDH, B2M, and AA stage (enhanced TS) increased the ability to identify HR subsets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies showed albumin at diagnosis could be used to predict outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but whether albumin could improve the international prognostic index (IPI) risk stratification remains unknown. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed 440 de novo DLBCL patients in this study. The cutoff value of albumin was 39.2 g/L. Patients with high serum albumin showed superior OS and PFS (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). According to IPI, there were 163 patients (37.0%) in low-risk group, 107 (24.3%) in low-intermediate risk group, 114 (25.9%) in high-intermediate risk group and 56 (12.7%) in high-risk group. Further analysis showed high albumin could identify a subgroup of patients with extremely superior OS and PFS in low IPI risk patients (p = 0.022 and p = 0.034, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that high albumin was an independent prognostic factor for OS (relative ratio [RR] 0.122; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.021-0.715, p = 0.020) and trend for PFS (RR 0.417; 95% CI 0.168-1.035, p = 0.059). In conclusion, our study suggests that albumin at diagnosis is a simple and effective prognostic factor in DLBCL patients, allowing the identification of a superior outcome subgroup in low-risk patients, which may help to guide treatment in clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and other prognostic models cannot accurately classify risks in patients with lower-risk diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study retrospectively analyzed serum levels of ferritin (500 and ≥ 500 ng/mL) and other reported risk factors for survival in 312 patients. High and high-intermediate risk IPI scores (hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 2.22 [1.33, 3.72], P = 0.002 and 2.29 [1.33, 3.93], P = 0.003, respectively) and ferritin concentration ≥ 500 ng/mL (HR [95% CI] 2.22 [1.37, 3.60], P = 0.001 and 2.18 [1.31, 3.63], P = 0.003, respectively) were independent poor prognostic factors for 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in all patients. Additionally, high ferritin level (≥ 500 ng/mL) was an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS and OS in patients with lower-risk IPI (HR [95% CI] 3.37 [1.36, 8.33], P = 0.009 and 3.29 [1.23, 8.83], P = 0.0018, respectively). In conclusion, serum ferritin levels may be helpful in predicting survival in patients with DLBCL, especially in those with lower-risk IPI scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 27% of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cases, bone marrow (BM), assessed by BM biopsy, is involved. BM involvement, an extranodal site involvement, affects the International Prognostic Index (IPI) score adversely. However, chromosomal abnormalities are neither included as a prognostic factor nor are they considered in the IPI risk classification category. We retrospectively analyzed 600 DLBCL patients at diagnosis for BM involvement (by both BM biopsy immunohistochemistry [BMI] with karyotyping and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography [FDG-PET] high uptake [BMP]). The BM-involved DLBCL patients identified by both BMI and BMP showed significantly inferior survival outcomes. Chromosomal abnormalities, especially complex karyotype (CK) of the involved BM, are related to much worse survival outcomes due to the inadequate treatment response including frontline auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, CK population should either be considered for more aggressive treatment modalities, such as frontline allo-HSCT, or those further clinical trials are explored for alternative or novel treatment approaches. Furthermore, if the FDG-PET shows high possibility of marrow involvement, bilateral BM biopsy with cytogenetic evaluation should be incorporated into the routine workup for newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. This is to look for other markers of poor-risk factors, such as CK or further genetic mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While various tools such as the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and its derivatives exist for risk-stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at diagnosis, patient and disease characteristics capable of predicting outcome after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) are not clearly defined. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 111 DLBCL patients (78 relapsed and 33 refractory) who underwent HDC/ASCT at our institution from 2010-2015. After a median follow-up time of 4.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.2-8.1), the likelihood of 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 62.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-72.4%) and the likelihood of 5-year overall survival (OS) was 68.9% (95% CI, 60.7%-78.2%). More than three chemotherapy regimens prior to ASCT was the only variable associated with lower likelihood of PFS (P = .004) and OS (P = 0.026). Male gender and high IPI score at time of ASCT were also associated with lower likelihood of PFS (P = .043; P = .013). NCCN IPI and age-adjusted IPI at time of ASCT were not predictive of outcome following ASCT. Patients with refractory and relapsed disease had similar outcomes post-ASCT (P = .207 for PFS, P = .073 for OS). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present an analysis of 98 consecutive patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated over a 10-year period within Western Australia. The most common frontline therapies were CHO(E)P (47%), HyperCVAD (21%), and reduced intensity therapy or supportive care alone (19%). Median and 4-year overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 1.59 years and 34%. Amongst CHO(E)P and HyperCVAD-treated patients, elevated LDH, advanced stage, IPI >1, and non-ALK + ALCL histology predicted inferior progression-free survival (PFS). Inferior OS was predicted by elevated LDH, age >60, IPI >1, and non-ALK + ALCL histology. Response rates and PFS were not significantly different between patients treated with CHO(E)P or HyperCVAD. OS was longer in the HyperCVAD group, however this was not significant on multivariable analysis and appears to relate to the younger age and more aggressive therapy at relapse in this group. Our data confirmed the prognostic utility of the IPI in patients with PTCL and do not demonstrate a clear benefit of HyperCVAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using interim Deauville score on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan and baseline International Prognostic Index (IPI). This retrospective study included 220 patients (median age, 64 years; men, 60%) diagnosed with DLBCL between 2007 and 2016 at our institution, treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy. Interim PET-CT was performed after three cycles of immuno-chemotherapy. Interim Deauville score was assessed as 4 or 5 in 49 patients (22.3%), and 94 patients (42.7%) had high-intermediate or high-risk IPI scores. In multivariate analysis, interim Deauville score (1-3 and 4-5) and baseline IPI (low/low-intermediate and high-intermediate/high) were independently associated with progression-free survival (for Deauville score, hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 vs. 2.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.83-4.78], P < 0.001; for IPI, HR, 1.00 vs. 4.84 [95% CI, 2.84-8.24], P < 0.001). We stratified patients into three groups: low-risk (interim Deauville scores 1-3 and low/low-intermediate IPI), intermediate-risk (Deauville scores 1-3 with high-intermediate/high IPI or Deauville scores 4-5 with low/low-intermediate IPI), and high-risk (Deauville scores 4-5 and high-intermediate/high IPI). This early risk stratification showed a strong association with progression-free survival (HR, 1.00 vs. 3.98 [95% CI 2.10-7.54] vs. 13.97 [95% CI 7.02-27.83], P < 0.001). Early risk stratification using interim Deauville score and baseline IPI predicts the risk of disease progression or death in patients with DLBCL. Our results provide guidance with interim PET-driven treatment intensification strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify prognostic factors for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), specifically those classified into conflicting subgroups by Hans' and Choi's classification algorithms. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data of 154 patients diagnosed with de novo DLBCL in the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2004 to September 2011. All cases were classified into subgroups based on Hans' and Choi's algorithms with immunohistochemical markers. Statistical Analysis Used: The correlation between various clinicopathological factors and 5-year survival rate, the correlation between those factors with the International Prognostic Index, the concordance between Hans' and Choi's approach was evaluated. The survival in different subtypes as classified by Hans' or Choi's approach was mapped. Results: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 2–5, positive Bcl-2 expression, negative CD10 expression or negative Bcl-6 expression significantly correlated with worse prognosis. The two algorithms showed good consistency (83% concordance, Kappa = 0.660, P < 0.001). By both classifications, the 5-year overall survival rate in germinal center B-cell-like subtype (GCB) lymphoma is significantly higher than that in the non-GCB subtype. There were 25 cases assigned to conflicting subtypes by the two approaches. Among these 25 cases, ECOG 2–5, positive Bcl-2 expression, negative CD10 expression, or negative Bcl-6 expression significantly correlated with worse prognosis. Conclusions: ECOG 2–5, positive Bcl-2 expression, negative CD10 expression, or negative Bcl-6 expression are independent markers for poor prognosis of DLBCL patients. There were 15% cases assigned to conflicting subgroups based on the two algorithms. For these cases, ECOG 2–5, positive Bcl-2 expression, negative CD10 expression, or negative Bcl-6 expression still significantly correlate with poor prognosis.